‘If They Don’t Care, I Don’t Care’: Millennial and Generation Z Students and the Impact of Faculty Caring
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article draws on a qualitative study of 31 Millennial and Generation Z students to examine the meaning of teacher “caring” in a higher education context. Prior research clearly documents the importance of caring to student engagement, although much of that scholarship focuses on secondary schooling. Research also examines the changing demographics of higher education and new expectations brought to college classrooms by Millennials and others. In this article, we connect the existing research on caring and on generational differences to explore how traditional-aged undergraduates define caring and the degree to which that impacts their willingness to learn. Our findings indicate that students value approachability and relatability as traits in a caring professor; we also find that in-class pedagogical practices can dramatically demonstrate care or lack thereof. Our research suggests that the student success agenda in higher education must take in-class teaching practices seriously in order to impact students’ engagement and motivation to learn.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Braun, A. (2012). Trainee teachers, gender and becoming the ‘right’ person for the job: Care and authority in the vocational habitus of teaching. Oxford Review Of Education, 38(2), 231-246.
Chory, R. M., & Offstein, E. H. (2017). ‘Your Professor Will Know You as a Person’: Evaluating and Rethinking the Relational Boundaries between Faculty and Students. Journal of Management Education, 41(1), 9-38.
Cooper, K., & Miness, A. M. (2014). The co-creation of caring student-teacher relationships: Does teacher understanding matter? High School Journal, 97(4), 264-290.
Dallavis, C. (2014). Culturally responsive caring and expectations for academic achievement in a Catholic school. Catholic Education: A Journal Of Inquiry And Practice, 17(2), 154-171.
Finn, A. N., Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., Elledge, N., Jernberg, K. A., & Larson, L. M. (2009). A metaanalytical review of teacher credibility and its associations with teacher behaviors and student outcomes. Communication Education, 58(4), 516-537.
Forrester, G. (2005). All in a day's work: primary teachers ‘performing’ and ‘caring’. Gender & Education, 17(3), 271-287. doi:10.1080/09540250500145114 Getting to Know GEN Z - Next. (n.d.). Retrieved November 25, 2017, from https://www.bncollege.com/Gen-Z-ResearchReport-Final.pdf
Goldman, Z., & Martin, M. (2016). Millennial students in the college classroom: Adjusting to academic entitlement. Communication Education, 65 (3), 365-367.
Howe, N., & W. Strauss. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage.
Kleinhans, K., Chakradhar, K., Muller, S., & Waddill, P. (2015). Multigenerational perceptions of the academic work environment in higher education in the United States. Higher Education (00181560), 70(1), 89-103. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9825-y
Leinberger, G. (2015). Teaching millennials: Time for a change in tactics. Journal Of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 15(1), 123-132.
Loveland, E. (2017). Instant generation. Journal of College Admission, (234), 34-38.
Maürtin-Cairncross, A. (2014). A glimpse of Generation-Y in higher education: Some implications for teaching and learning environments. South African Journal Of Higher Education, 28(2), 564583.
Meyers, S. A. (2009). Do your students care whether you care about them? College Teaching, 57(4), 205-210.
Noblit, G. W., Rogers, D. L., & McCadden, B. 1. (1995). In the meantime: The possibilities of caring. Phi Delta Kappan, 76680-685.
O'Brien, L. M. (2010). Caring in the ivory tower. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1), 109-115. doi:10.1080/13562510903487818
Posselt, J.R., & Lipson, S.K. (2016). “Competition, anxiety, and depression in the college classroom: Variations by student identity and field of study.” Journal Of College Student Development 57(8), 973-989.
Rickes, P. C. (2016). How gen z will continue to transform higher education space. Planning for Higher Education Journal, 44(4), 21-45
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z: Educating and engaging the next generation of students. About Campus, 22(3), 21-26. https://doi:10.1002/abc.21293
Shatto, B., & Erwin, K. (2016). Moving on from millennials: Preparing for generation z. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(6), 253-254. doi:10.3928/00220124-20160518-05
Slate, J. R., LaPrairie, K. N., Schulte, D. P., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2011). Views of effective college faculty: a mixed analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(3), 331-346. http://doi:10.1080/02602930903428684
Stasio Jr., J. S. (2013). Rethinking assessment: Understanding how the millennial generation learns in the college classroom. Pedagogy & The Human Sciences, 1(3), 34-50.
Teven, J. J. (2007). Teacher caring and classroom behavior: Relationships with student affect and perceptions of teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly, 55(4), 433450. http://doi:10.1080/01463370701658077
Teven, J. J., & Hanson, T. L. (2004). The impact of teacher immediacy and perceived caring on teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly, 52(1), 39-53.
Thayer-Bacon, B. J., & Bacon, C. S. (1996). Caring professors: A model. Journal of General Education, 45(4), 255-69.
Therrell, J. A., & Dunneback, S. K. (2015). Millennial perspectives and priorities. Journal Of The Scholarship of Teaching And Learning, 15(5), 49-63.
Tosolt, B. (2010). Gender and race differences in middle school students' perceptions of caring teacher behaviors. Multicultural Perspectives, 12(3), 145-151. doi:10.1080/15210960.2010.504484
Varallo, S. M. (2008). Motherwork in academe: Intensive caring for the millennial student. Women's Studies in Communication, 31(2), 151-157.
Vogt, F. (2002). A caring teacher: Explorations into primary school teachers' professional identity and ethic of care. Gender & Education, 14(3), 251-264. doi:10.1080/0954025022000010712
Walker, C., & Gleaves, A. (2016). Constructing the caring higher education teacher: A theoretical framework. Teaching & Teacher Education. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.013