Eur. J. Entomol. 111 (3): 371-378, 2014 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2014.039

Preference and performance of the larvae of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) on three species of European oaks

Slobodan MILANOVIĆ1,5, Jelica LAZAREVIĆ2, Zorica POPOVIĆ2, Zoran MILETIĆ3, Miroslav KOSTIĆ4, Zlatan RADULOVIĆ3, Dragan KARADŽIĆ5, Ana VULETA2
1 Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; e-mail: slobodan.milanovic@mendelu.cz
2 Institute for Biological Research, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Despota Stefana 142, Belgrade 11000, Serbia; e-mails: jellaz@ibiss.bg.ac.rs; zorica.popovic@ibiss.bg.ac.rs; ana.vuleta@ibiss.bg.ac.rs
3 Institute of Forestry, Kneza Visešlava 3, Belgrade 11000, Serbia; e-mails: zoranmil@ptt.rs; zlatan.radulovic@gmail.com
4 Institute for Medicinal Plant Research, Tadeuša Košćuška 1, Belgrade 11000, Serbia; e-mail: mkostic@mocbilja.rs
5 University of Belgrade Faculty of Forestry, Kneza Višeslava 1, Belgrade 11000, Serbia; e-mails: slobodan.milanovic@sfb.bg.ac.rs; dragan.karadzic@sfb.bg.ac.rs

The gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), causes enormous damage to broadleaved forests in the northern hemisphere where it frequently defoliates large areas of forest. Since outbreaks begin in oak forests, its most suitable habitat, we determined the preference and performance of gypsy moth larvae when reared on three species of native oaks: sessile oak, Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.; Turkey oak, Q. cerris L.; and Hungarian oak, Q. frainetto (Ten.). Leaf expansion and selected physical and chemical characteristics of the oak leaves were also measured. The shortest development time and highest relative consumption (RCR), growth rate (RGR), assimilation efficiency (AD), efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) and digested food into larval biomass (ECD) values were recorded when larvae were fed on Turkey oak. Two-choice tests revealed that Turkey oak is the preferred host plant. It had the highest total soluble protein and leaf nitrogen content, lowest C/N ratio and its phenology was well synchronized with the hatching of the larvae. The worst performance and lowest preference index were recorded when fed on Hungarian oak, the leaves of which had the lowest protein and nitrogen content, while in terms of the values for preference and performance the larvae fed on sessile oak were intermediate. Our results indicate that forests with Turkey oak are highly likely to be defoliated by gypsy moth larvae and therefore should be regularly monitored.

Keywords: Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae, Lymantria dispar, Quercus, herbivore-plant interactions, foliar chemistry, feeding preference, nutritional indices

Received: March 25, 2013; Revised: January 29, 2014; Accepted: January 29, 2014; Prepublished online: April 23, 2014; Published: July 14, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
MILANOVIĆ, S., LAZAREVIĆ, J., POPOVIĆ, Z., MILETIĆ, Z., KOSTIĆ, M., RADULOVIĆ, Z., KARADŽIĆ, D., & VULETA, A. (2014). Preference and performance of the larvae of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) on three species of European oaks. EJE111(3), 371-378. doi: 10.14411/eje.2014.039
Download citation

References

  1. Abbate G., Blasi C., Paura B., Scoppola A. & Spada F. 1990: Phytoclimatic characterization of Quercus frainetto Ten. Stands in Peninsular Italy. - Vegetatio 90: 35-45 Go to original source...
  2. Augner M. 1995: Low nutritive quality as a plant defense: effect of herbivore-mediated interactions. - Evol. Ecol. 9: 605-616 Go to original source...
  3. Axelrod D.I. 1983: Biogeography of oaks in the arcto-tertiary province. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 629-657 Go to original source...
  4. Barbehenn R.V., Karowe D.N. & Chen Z. 2004: Performance of a generalist grasshopper on a C3 and C4 grass: compensation for the effects of elevated CO2 on plant nutritional quality. - Oecologia 140: 96-103 Go to original source...
  5. Barbehenn R.V., Jaros A., Lee G., Mozola C., Weir Q. & Salminen J.-P. 2009: Hydrolyzable tannins as ''quantitative defenses'': Limited impact against Lymantria dispar caterpillars on hybrid poplar. - J. Insect Physiol. 55: 297-304 Go to original source...
  6. Barbehenn R.V., Niewiadomski J., Pecci C. & Salminen J.-P. 2013: Physiological benefits of feeding in the spring by Lymantria dispar caterpillars on red oak and sugar maple leaves: nutrition versus oxidative stress. - Chemoecology 23: 59-70 Go to original source...
  7. Barbosa P. & Krischik V.A. 1987: Influence of alkaloids on feeding preference of eastern deciduous forest trees by the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar). - Am. Nat. 130: 53-69 Go to original source...
  8. Benrey B. & Denno R.F. 1997: The slow-growth-high-mortality hypothesis: a test using the cabbage butterfly. - Ecology 78: 987-999 Go to original source...
  9. Berryman A.A. 1996: What causes population cycles of forest Lepidoptera? - Tree 11: 28-32 Go to original source...
  10. Bradford M.M. 1976: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. - Analyt. Biochem. 72: 248-254 Go to original source...
  11. Cambini A. & Magnoler A. 1997: The influence of two evergreen oaks on development characteristics and fecundity of the gypsy moth. - Redia 80: 33-43
  12. Chen Y.Z., Lin L., Wang C.W., Yeh C.C. & Hwang S.Y. 2004: Response of two Pieris (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) species to fertilization of a host plant. - Zool. Stud. 43: 778-786
  13. Chen Y., Ruberson J.R. & Olson D.M. 2008: Nitrogen fertilization rate affects larval performance and feeding, and oviposition preference of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua, on cotton. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 126: 244-255 Go to original source...
  14. Clancy K.M. & Price P.W. 1987: Rapid herbivore growth enhances enemy attack: sublethal plant defenses remain a paradox. - Ecology 68: 733-737 Go to original source...
  15. Clissold F.J., Sanson G.D., Read J. & Simpson S.J. 2009: Gross vs. net income: How plant toughness affects performance of an insect herbivore. - Ecology 90: 3393-3405 Go to original source...
  16. Clissold F.J., Tedder B.J., Conigrave A.D. & Simpson S.J. 2010: The gastrointestinal tract as a nutrient-balancing organ. - Proc. R. Soc. (B) 277: 1751-1759 Go to original source...
  17. Couture J.J., Meehan T.D. & Lindroth R.L. 2012: Atmospheric change alters foliar quality of host trees and performance of two outbreak insect species. - Oecologia 168: 863-876 Go to original source...
  18. Davidson C.B., Gottschalk K.W. & Johnson J.E. 1999: Tree mortality following defoliation by the European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) in the United States: a review. - Forest Sci. 45: 74-84
  19. Ducousso A. & Bordacs S. 2004: EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for Genetic Conservation and Use for Pedunculate and Sessile oaks (Quercus robur and Q. petraea). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, 6 pp
  20. Elkinton J.S. & Liebhold A.M. 1990: Population dynamics of gypsy moth in North America. - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 571-596 Go to original source...
  21. Fajvan M.A., Rentch J. & Gottschalk K. 2008: The effects of thinning and gypsy moth defoliation on wood volume growth in oaks. - Trees 22: 257-268 Go to original source...
  22. Farrar R.R., Barbour J.D. & Kennedy G.G. 1989: Quantifying food consumption and growth in insects. - Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82: 593-598 Go to original source...
  23. Feeny P. 1970: Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a course of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. - Ecology 51: 565-581 Go to original source...
  24. Feeny P. 1976: Plant apparency and chemical defense. In Wallace J.W. & Mansell R.L. (eds): Recent Advances in Phytochemistry. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1-40 Go to original source...
  25. Fordyce J.A. & Shapiro A. 2003: Another perspective on the slow-growth/high-mortality hypothesis: chilling effects on swallowtail larvae. - Ecology 84: 263-268 Go to original source...
  26. Foss L.K. & Rieske L.K. 2003: Species-specific differences in oak foliage affect preference and performance of gypsy moth caterpillars. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 108: 87-93 Go to original source...
  27. Fox L.R., Letourneau D.K., Eisenbach J. & Nouhuys S.V. 1990: Parasitism rates and sex ratios of a parasitoid wasp: effects of herbivore and plant quality. - Oecologia 83: 414-419 Go to original source...
  28. Giertych M.J., Bakowski M., Karolewski P., Zytkowiak R. & Grzebyta J. 2005: Influence of mineral fertilization on food quality of oak leaves and utilization efficiency of food components by the gypsy moth. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 117: 59-69 Go to original source...
  29. Gottschalk K.W. 1990: Gypsy moth effects on mast production. In McGee C.E. (ed.): Proceedings of the Workshop: Southern Appalachian Mast Management. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, pp. 42-50
  30. Gripenberg S., Mayhew P.J., Parnell M. & Roslin T. 2010: A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. - Ecol. Lett. 13: 383-393 Go to original source...
  31. Gyoerfi J. 1960: Contributions to the nutritional biology of the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.). - Erdeszeti Kutatasok 56: 279-291 [in Hungarian]
  32. Haeggstroem H. & Larsson S. 1995: Slow larval growth on a suboptimal willow results in high predation mortality in the leaf beetle Galerucella lineola. - Oecologia 104: 308-315 Go to original source...
  33. Haukioja E., Ossipov V. & Lempa K. 2002: Interactive effects of leaf maturation and phenolics on consumption and growth of a geometrid moth. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104: 125-136 Go to original source...
  34. Hemming J.D.C. & Lindroth R.L. 1995: Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: effects on performance of gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. - Oecologia 103: 79-88 Go to original source...
  35. Hlasny T. & Turcani M. 2009: Insect pests as climate change driven disturbances in forest ecosystems. In Strelcova K., Matyas C., Kleidon A., Lapin M., Matejka F., Blazenec M., Skvarenina J. & Holecy J. (eds): Bioclimatology and Natural Hazards. Springer, Berlin, pp. 165-178 Go to original source...
  36. Hlasny T., Holusa J., Stepanek P., Turcani M., Sitkova Z. & Zajickova L. 2011: Expected impacts of climate change on forests: Czech Republic as a case study. - J. Forest Sci. 57: 422-431 Go to original source...
  37. Horvat I., Glavac V. & Ellenberg H. 1974: Vegetation of Sudosteuropas. Geobotanica selecta, Band IV. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 768 pp
  38. Hunter A.F. & Elkinton J.S. 2000: Effects of synchrony with host plant on populations of a spring-feeding Lepidopteran. - Ecology 81: 1248-1261 Go to original source...
  39. Ivashov A.V., Boyko G.E. & Simchuk A.P. 2002: The role of host plant phеnology in the development of the oak leafroller moth, Tortrix viridana L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). - Forest Ecol. Manag. 157: 7-14 Go to original source...
  40. Jalas J. & Suominen J. 1987: Atlas Florae Europaeae. Distribution of Vascular Plants in Europe. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 206 pp
  41. Jankovic-Tomanic M. 2012: Effects of Temperature and Food Quality on Variability of Fitness Components and Physiology of Digestion in the Gypsy Moth Larvae Lymantria dispar L. PhD Thesis, University of Belgrade, 230 pp
  42. Kleiner K.W. & Montgomery M.E. 1994: Forest stand susceptibility to the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae): Species and site effects on foliage quality to larvae. - Environ. Entomol. 23: 699-711 Go to original source...
  43. Konstantinidis P., Chatziphilippidis G., Tsiourlis G. & Tsiontsis A. 2002: Taxonomy and ecology of plant communities of Quercus frainetto Ten. (Q. conferta Kit.) forests in Greece. - Israel J. Plant Sci. 50: 145-154 Go to original source...
  44. Kurir A. 1953: The food plants of the gypsy moth: A contribution to knowledge of its feeding habits. - J. Appl. Entomol. 34: 543-586 Go to original source...
  45. Lazarevic J., Peric-Mataruga V., Stojkovic B. & Tucic N. 2002: Adaptation of the gypsy moth to an unsuitable host plant. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 102: 75-86 Go to original source...
  46. Liebhold A.M., Gottschalk K.W., Muzika R.M., Montgomery M.E., Yong R., O'Day K. & Brooks K. 1995: Suitability of North American Tree Species to the Gypsy Moth: A Summary of Field and Laboratory Tests. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-211. Radnor, PA, 34 pp Go to original source...
  47. Lindroth R.L., Klein K.A., Hemming J.D.C. & Feuker A.M. 1997: Variation in temperature and dietary nitrogen affect performance of the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.). - Physiol. Entomol. 22: 55-64 Go to original source...
  48. Magnoler A. & Cambini A. 1997: Consumption and utilization of leaf tissue of Quercus suber L. and Quercus ilex L. by Lymantria dispar L. larvae. - Redia 80: 99-106
  49. Makkar H.P.S. 2000: Quantification of Tannins in Tree Foliage. A Laboratory Manual for the FAO/IAEA Co-ordinated Research Project on Use of Nuclear and Related Techniques to Develop Simple Tannin Assays for Predicting and Improving the Safetyand Efficiency of Feeding Ruminants on Tanniniferous Tree Foliage. Joint FAO/IAEA of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. Animal Production and Health Sub-programme, FAO/IAEA Working Document. IAEA, Vienna, 26 pp
  50. Makkar H.P.S., Dawra R.K. & Singh B. 1988: Determination of both tannin and protein in a tannin-protein complex. - J. Agric. Food Chem. 36: 523-525 Go to original source...
  51. Makkar H.P.S., Bluemmel M., Borowy N.K. & Becker K. 1993: Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods. - J. Sci. Food Agric. 61: 161-165 Go to original source...
  52. Marovic R., Maravic M., Jancic G. & Lazarev V. 1998: Gypsy moth outbreaks in Serbia. In Adamovic Z. (ed.): Gypsy Moth Outbreaks in Serbia. The Entomological Society of Serbia, Belgrade, pp. 1-12
  53. Martin M.M. & Van't Hof H.M. 1988: The cause of reduced growth of Manduca sexta larvae on a low-water diet: increased metabolic processing or nutrient limitation? - J. Insect Physiol. 6: 515-525 Go to original source...
  54. Mattson W.J. 1980: Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 119-161 Go to original source...
  55. Mrdakovic M., Peric Mataruga V., Ilijin L., Jankovic Tomanic M., Mircic D. & Lazarevic J. 2013: Response of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) larvae from differently adapted populations to allelochemical stress: Effects of tannic acid. - Eur. J. Entomol. 110: 55-63 Go to original source...
  56. Muzika R.M. & Liebhold A.M. 1999: Changes in radial increment of host and nonhost tree species with gypsy moth defoliation. - Can. J. Forest Res. 29: 1365-1373 Go to original source...
  57. Muzika R.M. & Liebhold A.M. 2001: A critique of silvicultural approaches to managing defoliating insects in North America. - Agr. Forest Entomol. 2: 97-105 Go to original source...
  58. Naidoo R. & Lechowicz M.J 2001: The effects of gypsy moth on the radial growth of deciduous trees. - Forest Sci. 47: 338-348
  59. Ossipov V., Haukioja E., Ossipova S., Hanhimaeki S. & Pihlaja K. 2001: Phenolic and phenolic-related factors as determinants of suitability of mountain birch leaves to an herbivorous insect. - Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 29: 223-240 Go to original source...
  60. Pearse I.S. 2011: The role of leaf defensive traits in oaks on the preference and performance of a polyphagous herbivore, Orgyia vetusta. - Ecol. Entomol. 36: 635-642 Go to original source...
  61. Pernek M., Pilas I., Vrbek B., Benko M., Hrasovec B. & Milkovic J. 2008: Forecasting the impact of the gypsy moth on lowland hardwood forests by analyzing the cyclical pattern of population and climate data series. - Forest Ecol. Manag. 255: 1740-1748 Go to original source...
  62. Ponomarieva V.V. & Plotnikova T.A. 1975: Determination of the Content and Composition of Organic Matter in Peat Soils. Methods of the Determination of Humus Content and Composition in the Soils (Mineral and Peat). Dokuchaev Central Soil Science Museum, St. Petersburg [in Russian]
  63. Prudic K.L., Oliver J.C. & Bowers M.D. 2005: Soil nutrient effects on oviposition preference, larval performance and chemical defense of a specialist insect herbivore. - Oecologia 143: 578-587 Go to original source...
  64. Rhee K.C. 2001: Unit B1.2. Determination of total nitrogen. In Wrolstad R.E., Acree T.E., Decker E.A., Penne M.H., Reid D.S., Schwartz S.J., Shoemaker C.F., Smith D. & Sporns P. (eds): Handbook of Food Analytical Chemistry, Pigments, Colorants, Flavors, Texture and Bioactive Food Components. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 95-113
  65. Rossiter M.C. 1994: Maternal effects hypothesis of herbivore outbreak. - Bioscience 44: 752-763 Go to original source...
  66. Rossiter M.C., Schultz J.C. & Baldwin I.T. 1988: Relationships among defoliation, red oak phenolics, and gypsy moth growth and reproduction. - Ecology 69: 267-277 Go to original source...
  67. Salminen J.P., Ossipov V., Haukioja E. & Pihlaja K. 2001: Seasonal variation in the content of hydrolysable tannins in leaves of Betula pubescens. - Phytochemistry 57: 15-22 Go to original source...
  68. Schopf A., Hoch G., Klaus A., Novotny J., Zubrik M. & Schafellner C. 1999: Influence of food quality of two oak species on the development and growth of gypsy moth larvae. In Lieutier F., Mattson W.J. & Wagner M.R. (eds): Physiology and Genetics of Tree-Phytophage Interactions. INRA, Paris, pp. 231-247
  69. Scriber J.M. 1979: Effects of leaf-water supplementation upon post-ingestive nutritional indices of forb-, shrub-, vine-, and tree feeding Lepidoptera. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 25: 240-252 Go to original source...
  70. Sen A., Quilho T. & Pereira H. 2011: Bark anatomy of Quercus cerris L. var. cerris from Turkey. - Turkish J. Bot. 35: 45-55 Go to original source...
  71. Simpson S.J. & Raubenheimer D. 2001: The geometric analysis of nutrient-allelochemical interactions: A case study using locusts. - Ecology 82: 422-439 Go to original source...
  72. Traw M.B., Lindroth R.L. & Bazzaz F.A. 1996: Decline in gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) performance in an elevated CO2 atmosphere depends upon host plant species. - Oecologia 108: 113-120 Go to original source...
  73. Tuomi J., Niemela P., Chapin F.S. III, Brayant J.P. & Siren S. 1988: Defensive response of trees in relation with their carbon/nutrient balance. In Mattson W.J., Levieux J. & Dagan B.C. (eds): Mechanisms of Woody Plant Defenses Against Insects. Springer, New York, pp. 57-73 Go to original source...
  74. Valentine H.T. & Talerico R.L. 1980: Gypsy moth larval growth and consumption on red oak. - Forest Sci. 26: 599-605
  75. Valentin H.T., Wallner W.E. & Wargo P.M. 1983: Nutritional changes in host foliage during and after defoliation, and their relation to the weight of gypsy moth pupae. - Oecologia 57: 298-302 Go to original source...
  76. Van Asch M. & Visser M.E. 2007: Phenology of forest caterpillars and their host trees: The importance of synchrony. - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52: 37-55 Go to original source...
  77. Waldbauer G.P. 1968: The consumption and utilization of food by insects. - Adv. Insect Physiol. 5: 229-288 Go to original source...
  78. Wang X.W., Ji L.Z., Zhang Q.H., Liu Y. & Wang G.Q. 2009: Effects of elevated CO2 on feeding preference and performance of the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) larvae. - J. Appl. Entomol. 133: 47-57 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.