Abstract
Phase synchrony analysis is a relatively new concept that is being increasingly used on neurophysiological data obtained through different methodologies. It is currently believed that phase synchrony is an important signature of information binding between distant sites of the brain, especially during cognitive tasks. Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings are the most widely used recording technique for recording brain signals and assessing phase synchrony patterns. In this study, we address the suitability of phase synchrony analysis in EEG recordings. Using geometrical arguments and numerical examples, employing EEG and magnetoencephalographic data, we show that the presence of a common reference signal in the case of EEG recordings results in a distortion of the synchrony values observed, in that the amplitudes of the signals influence the synchrony measured, and in general destroys the intended physical interpretation of phase synchrony.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burns, A. (2004) Fourier-, Hilbert- and wavelet-based signal analysis: are they really different approaches? J. Neurosci. Methods, 137, 321–332.
Chavez, M., Le Van Quyen, M., Navarro, V., Baulac, M., and Martinerie, J. (2003) Spatio-temporal dynamics prior to neocortical seizures: amplitude versus phase couplings. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50, 571–583.
Fein, G., Raz, J., Brown, F.F., and Merrin, E. L. (1988) Common reference coherence data are confounded by power and phase effects. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69, 581–584.
Friston, K. J. (2001) Brain Function, Nonlinear Coupling, and Neuronal Transients Neuroscientist, 7, 406–418.
Gabor, D. (1946) Theory of Communications. J. IEE London 93, 429.
Hagemann, D., Naumann, E., and Thayer, J. F. (2001) The quest for the EEG reference revisited: a glance from brain asymmetry research. Psychophysiology 38, 847–857.
Le Van Quyen, M., Foucher, J., Lachaux, J., Rodríguez, E., Lutz, A., Martinerie, J., and Varela, F. J. (2001) Comparison of Hilbert transform and wavelet methods for the analysis of neuronal synchrony. J. Neurosci Methods 111, 83–98.
Lutz, A., Lachaux, J. P., Martinerie, J., and Varela, F.J. (2002). Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1586–1591.
Mormann, F., Lehnertz, K., David, P., and Elger, C.E. (2000) Mean phase coherence as a measure for phase synchronization and its application to the EEG of epilepsy patients. Physica D 144, 358–369.
Nicolelis, M. A. L. (1999) Methods for Neural Ensemble Recordings, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Nunez, P. L. (1981) Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Rodríguez, E., George, N., Lachaux, J. P., Martinerie, J., Renault, B., and Varela, F. J. (1999) Perception’s shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature 397, 430–433.
Shaw, J. C., Brooks, S., Colter, N., and O’Connor, K. P. (1979) in Hemisphere asymmetries of function in psychopathology, Gruzelier and Flor-Henry, eds., Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical, Amsterdam, pp. 257–284.
Spencer, K. M., Nestor, P. G., Niznikiewicz, M. A., Salisbury, D. F., Shenton, M. E., and McCarley, R. W. (2003) Abnormal neural synchrony in schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 23, 7407–7411.
Varela, F. J., Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., and Martinerie, J. (2001) The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 229–239.
Zaveri, H.P., Duckrow, R.B., and Spencer, S.S. (2000) The effect of a scalp reference signal on coherence measurements of intracranial electroencephalograms. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111, 1293–1299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guevara, R., Velazquez, J.L.P., Nenadovic, V. et al. Phase synchronization measurements using electroencephalographic recordings. Neuroinform 3, 301–313 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1385/NI:3:4:301
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/NI:3:4:301