Chest
Volume 125, Issue 1, January 2004, Pages 77-84
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
COPD
Comparison of Continuous and Discrete Measurements of Dyspnea During Exercise in Patients With COPD and Normal Subjects

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.125.1.77Get rights and content

Study objectives

The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to compare results of the discrete and the continuous methods for measuring breathlessness; (2) to examine test-retest reliability; (3) and to test the hypothesis that patients with COPD have higher slopes and lower x-intercepts and absolute thresholds for power production, oxygen consumption (

o2), and minute ventilation as independent variables and breathlessness ratings as the dependent variable, as compared with healthy subjects.

Design

Visit 1 (familiarization) and visit 2 and visit 3 (2 days apart) with randomized assignment of the discrete and continuous methods for subjects rating breathlessness during cycle ergometry.

Setting

Cardiopulmonary exercise laboratory in a university medical center.

Participants

Twenty-four patients with COPD (mean age, 66 ± 8 years [± SD]) and 24 healthy subjects (mean age, 66 ± 10 years).

Interventions

None.

Measurements and results

Ratings of breathlessness on the Borg scale on cue with subjects moving and pressing the computer mouse button to indicate a rating (discrete method) or by moving the position of the mouse to adjust a vertical bar to indicate a change in breathlessness (continuous method). There were no significant differences in results between visit 2 and visit 3. Although peak exercise variables were similar with the discrete and continuous methods, both groups provided significantly more ratings of breathlessness with the continuous method. Patients with COPD exhibited higher slopes, lower x-intercepts, and lower absolute thresholds (breathlessness rating ≥ 0.5 [“just noticeable”] on the Borg scale) for power production and

o2-breathlessness compared with healthy subjects (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Elderly patients with COPD and healthy subjects are able to use the continuous method successfully. Reliability is excellent for both methods. The continuous method provides a greater number of breathlessness ratings over the course of exercise, and allows the clinician to calculate an absolute threshold and just-noticeable differences. Regression parameters and absolute thresholds discriminate between patients with COPD and healthy subjects.

Section snippets

Subjects

Inclusion criteria for all participants were as follows: age ≥ 45 years, ability to exercise on the cycle ergometer, and no history of clinically important comorbid disease. Patients with COPD were recruited from the outpatient clinics of our institution. The diagnosis of COPD was based on American Thoracic Society criteria,8 and each patient complained of exertion breathlessness. All healthy subjects were recruited from family members or friends of the patients, they denied any

Results

A total of 49 subjects were enrolled in the study. One patient was withdrawn from the study after visit 2 because she was unable to use the computer system consistently. Table 1 gives the characteristics of the 24 patients with COPD and 24 age-matched healthy subjects who completed the study. The age and gender distribution of the two groups were similar.

Figure 2 represents exercise data for an individual patient with COPD to illustrate the relationships between the physiologic variables and

Discussion

The major findings of this study were as follows: (1) there was excellent test-retest reliability for all of the parameters of interest; (2) the continuous method yielded significantly more ratings during exercise compared with the discrete method, and enabled calculation of an absolute threshold and JNDs; (3) patients with COPD exhibited significantly higher slopes and lower x-intercepts for power production and

o2 (as independent variables) with breathlessness (as the dependent variable)

Conclusions

The current study extends our previous report7 that elderly individuals, both healthy subjects as well as patients with COPD, can successfully use a computer system to provide spontaneous and continuous ratings of breathlessness during exercise. Furthermore, these results highlight several advantages of the continuous method. The continuous method illustrates clearly how the perception of breathlessness changes throughout the entire course of an exercise test rather than only at arbitrary 1-min

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (37)

  • Measuring intensity during free-living physical activities in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic literature review

    2022, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The Borg scores were used to assess dyspnoea, fatigue and rate of perceived exertion. Borg scales are valid, reliable, quick, user-friendly, and inexpensive tools and thus, widely used in broad free-living settings [18, 64-66]. These instruments have been recommended to prescribe exercise intensity in people with COPD [10] and to assess symptoms during cardiopulmonary exercise test [67].

  • Evaluation of Dyspnea in the Elderly

    2017, Clinics in Geriatric Medicine
  • Simple artificial training device for respiratory muscle strength and lung volumes in healthy young male and female subjects: A pilot study

    2017, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
    Citation Excerpt :

    Dyspnea also is used with precautions from any harmful exercise, especially in the COPD clinic. Although this assessment tool is subjective (ATS, 1999), it can be used to represent the intensity of overload during exercise in either patients with COPD or normal subjects (Fierro-Carrion et al., 2004). Moreover, other hemodynamic parameters in this study, such as heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), respiratory rate (RR), and % of oxygen saturation also were evaluated at the end of the training day in the last week, as was the peak dyspnea score, which had no statistical difference.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Financial support was provided by the National Institutes of Health, Small Business Innovation Grant No. 1 R43 HL68493-01 (Dr. Baird).

View full text