http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4463-5801
Figures
Abstract
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a cardinal role in the immune system by suppressing detrimental autoimmune responses, but their role in acute, chronic infectious diseases and tumor microenvironment remains unclear. We recently demonstrated that IFN-α/β receptor (IFNAR) signaling promotes Treg function in autoimmunity. Here we dissected the functional role of IFNAR-signaling in Tregs using Treg-specific IFNAR deficient (IFNARfl/flxFoxp3YFP-Cre) mice in acute LCMV Armstrong, chronic Clone-13 viral infection, and in tumor models. In both viral infection and tumor models, IFNARfl/flxFoxp3YFP-Cre mice Tregs expressed enhanced Treg associated activation antigens. LCMV-specific CD8+ T cells and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes from IFNARfl/flxFoxp3YFP-Cre mice produced less antiviral and antitumor IFN-γ and TNF-α. In chronic viral model, the numbers of antiviral effector and memory CD8+ T cells were decreased in IFNARfl/flxFoxp3YFP-Cre mice and the effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells exhibited a phenotype compatible with enhanced exhaustion. IFNARfl/flxFoxp3YFP-Cre mice cleared Armstrong infection normally, but had higher viral titers in sera, kidneys and lungs during chronic infection, and higher tumor burden than the WT controls. The enhanced activated phenotype was evident through transcriptome analysis of IFNARfl/flxFoxp3YFP-Cre mice Tregs during infection demonstrated differential expression of a unique gene signature characterized by elevated levels of genes involved in suppression and decreased levels of genes mediating apoptosis. Thus, IFN signaling in Tregs is beneficial to host resulting in a more effective antiviral response and augmented antitumor immunity.
Author summary
Type I interferons (IFNs) play a predominant role in the immune response to infectious pathogens. The cellular targets of IFNs have been difficult to dissect because of the ubiquitous expression of the type I interferon receptor (IFNAR). The immune response of mice to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) is one of the major models for analyzing the action of IFNs. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been implicated in the control of LCMV and it has been proposed that IFN may influence their function. The major goal of this study was to define the contribution of IFN signaling on Treg function during different stages LCMV infection. Tregs from mice with selective deletion of IFNAR manifested enhanced suppressive activity during acute/chronic LCMV infection resulting in increased CD8 T cell anergy, defective generation of memory T cells and persistence of virus. Similar effects of IFNAR signaling in Tregs were seen in a tumor model. We identified a unique set of genes in Tregs modulated by IFN signaling that may contribute to the enhanced suppressive function of IFNAR deficient Tregs. IFNs play a beneficial role during acute/chronic viral infections not only by contributing to viral clearance but also by attenuating the function of Tregs.
Citation: Gangaplara A, Martens C, Dahlstrom E, Metidji A, Gokhale AS, Glass DD, et al. (2018) Type I interferon signaling attenuates regulatory T cell function in viral infection and in the tumor microenvironment. PLoS Pathog 14(4): e1006985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006985
Editor: Paul G. Thomas, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, UNITED STATES
Received: November 17, 2017; Accepted: March 21, 2018; Published: April 19, 2018
This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its supporting information files. RNA sequence information reported in this study is deposited in NCBI GEO under the accession number: GSE104517.
Funding: This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIAID, NIH. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a subset of CD4+ T cells, which express the transcription factor Foxp3, and are critical in forestalling both self- and non-self-reactive immune responses [1, 2]. Tregs primarily mediate their suppressive function by targeting conventional effector T cell activation and differentiation, mainly by decreasing the functional activity of antigen presenting cells (APCs) [3]. The critical role of Tregs in autoimmunity is best observed in scurfy mice or patients with IPEX syndrome that are completely deficient in Tregs and succumb to systemic autoimmune disease at a young age. While Tregs must control the activation of T effector cells to prevent autoimmunity, it is also clear that enhanced activation of Tregs may result in the inhibition of host immunity directed against microbes (virus, bacteria, protozoa, fungi and helminth) or tumors leading to poor antimicrobial or antitumor immune response with the persistence of pathogens, and defective tumor immunity [4–6].
Many animal models of bacterial infection are characterized by the expansion of Foxp3+ Tregs including Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections and the suppressive function of Tregs can result in increased bacterial load with systemic tissue invasion [7–9]. Similarly in viral infection, higher frequencies of Tregs are associated with enhanced titers of Hepatitis C virus RNA and Dengue virus [10, 11]. Paradoxically, Tregs have been described to play an early protective role in local infection in animals models of Herpes simplex virus 2 and West Nile virus [12, 13]. During early phases of human immunodeficiency virus infection, Tregs have been postulated to control virus replication in target CD4+ T cells [14]. On the other hand Tregs may play an important beneficial role in preventing exuberant inflammatory responses during infection with parasites such as Pneumocystis carinii [15] and Schistosoma mansoni [16]. Similarly, Tregs protect the host from parasitic infections such as Plasmodium sp., Toxoplasma gondii, as well as infection with the fungus, Candida albicans [17–19]. These complex roles played by Tregs during acute and chronic microbial infections necessitate a delicate balance between the Foxp3+ Tregs and effector T cells to mount effective immune responses against pathogens without the induction of destructive autoimmunity.
The immune response towards viruses and intracellular bacteria are mediated by type I interferons (IFNs) which control the replication of pathogens within host cells. IFNs are members of a multi-gene family of cytokines, which encode IFN-α and IFN-β. Both IFN-α and IFN-β signal through a shared common heterodimeric receptor IFN-α/β receptor (IFNAR) composed of IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 [20]. The interactions of IFNs with the IFNAR mediates activation of Janus family protein kinases to induce the phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT). The canonical pathway of Type I IFN signaling is initiated by phosphorylation of STATs (STAT1, STAT2), induction of IFN-regulatory factor-9, resulting in the formation of a tri-molecular complex, IFN-stimulated gene factor-3, which translocates into the nucleus to induce transcription of IFN-stimulated genes through binding of IFN-stimulated response elements [21]. Additionally IFNAR signaling can trigger non-canonical pathways such as activation of γ-activated sequences through homodimerization of STATs (STAT1, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5, STAT6), phosphoinositide-3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway [22].
IFNs may mediate an array of host protective functions including restricting viral replication [23], activation of NK cell cytotoxicity, maturation of APCs, clonal expansion and survival of antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells during viral infection, promotion of B cell responses, and induction of apoptosis [24–30]. Type I IFNs have proven to be clinically useful in the treatment of chronic viral infections and certain types of leukemias [31]. Detrimental effects of type I IFNs have also been extensively documented during viral infections as well as during bacterial, fungal and parasitic infections [32]. One of the best examples of the complex regulation of antiviral immunity by type I IFNs is lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection (LCMV). Blockade of IFN signaling in acute infection with LCMV Armstrong infection results in abrogation of CD8+ T cell responses and defective control of infection [33]. In contrast, blockade of IFN signaling during persistent LCMV Clone (Cl)-13 infection diminished immunosuppressive signals and decreased levels of IL-10 and PD-L1 expressing immunoregulatory DCs. Virus titers in both serum and kidneys were also reduced. The cell type (s) mediating the immunosuppressive effects of IFN have not been defined [33, 34].
Studies on the effects of type I IFNs on Treg function yielded conflicting results [35, 36] and have not used experimental systems to examine the direct effects of IFNs on Treg cell homeostasis and functions. Recently, Srivastava et al (2014) demonstrated that mice infected with LCMV Armstrong manifested a decrease in the absolute numbers of splenic Tregs between days 4 and 7 post infection and that this reduction correlated with the expansion of both CD4+ and CD8+ T effector cells which peak on day 7 post infection. Furthermore, they also demonstrated a selective depletion of wild type (WT) Tregs on day 7 post infection of mixed bone marrow chimeras between WT mice and mice with a global deletion of IFNAR (IFNAR-/-). This latter result is difficult to interpret as our recent studies [37] have shown that IFNAR-/- Tregs in such chimeric (IFNAR-/- x WT) mice are at a competitive disadvantage as are IFNAR-/- Tregs in heterozygous female IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3Cre/WT mice.
In this study, we used IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice to determine the role of IFNAR signaling specifically in Tregs during acute and chronic LCMV infection as well as in models of colon adenocarcinoma and melanoma. We demonstrate that IFNAR signaling in Tregs during the course of both acute and chronic viral infection results in a decrease in their activation status and a decrease in their suppressive function in vivo. The hypersuppressive state of Tregs in the absence of IFNAR signaling results in decreased CD8+ effector T cells, enhanced T effector cell exhaustion, defective generation of antiviral memory CD8+ T cells, and enhanced LCMV persistence. Similarly, in the tumor models, enhanced tumor growth and failure to efficiently generate antitumor T effector cells were observed in the absence of IFNAR signaling in Tregs. The enhanced suppressor function in the absence of IFNAR signaling in Tregs was accompanied by the induction of a gene expression pattern which was similar in the acute and chronic infection models and may be responsible for the heightened suppressor function.
Results
IFNAR signaling in Tregs modulates the generation of antiviral effector T cells in acute LCMV infection
Studies performed by Srivastava et al. (2014), provided preliminary evidence that IFNAR signaling inhibits the function of Tregs during an acute LCMV infection and that the absence of this inhibitory effect resulted in enhanced Treg function and impaired antiviral effector T cell function. Because this study did not definitively prove that the target of the suppressive function of IFNAR signaling was the Foxp3+ Treg, we generated Treg-lineage specific IFNAR deficient mice by crossing IFNARfl/fl mice with Foxp3YFP-Cre mice. We confirmed that the IFNAR was specifically deleted in CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs and not in CD4+Foxp3- T cells, CD8+ T cells or B220+ B lymphocytes (S1A Fig). First, we compared the clearance of LCMV Armstrong from the sera of IFNARfl/fl, IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre, and IFNAR-/- mice at early time points post-infection. We observed that IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice showed significantly higher viral titers (D3, D7 and D10) than IFNARfl/fl mice, and as expected IFNAR-/- mice had the highest titers among the three groups [33, 38] (Fig 1A). However, IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice cleared LCMV Armstrong on day 14 post-infection.
(A) LCMV titers were determined from Armstrong virus infected IFNARfl/fl, IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNAR-/- mice sera on indicated days. (B-D) Splenocytes harvested from day 14 virus infected IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were stained for GP33, NP396 and GP276 tetramers and analyzed for Tet+ T cells within CD8+CD44+ cells. (E-G) Spleen cells stimulated with GP33, NP396, GP276 and Golgi Stop for 5 hours at 37 oC. Frequencies and absolute numbers of IFN-γ+ and TNF-α+ cytokine producing cells within CD8+CD44+GP33 Tet+, CD8+CD44+NP396 Tet+ and CD8+CD44+GP276 Tet+ T cells from day 14 acute LCMV infected mice are shown. (H and I) Spleen cells were analyzed (as in B-D) for GP66 Tet+ T cells, and IFN-γ+ and TNF-α+ producing cells were assessed among gated CD4+Foxp3-CD44+GP66 Tet+ T cells from day 14 acute LCMV infected mice. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data are shown from two to three experiments involving three to nine mice per group (A), and representative of two independent experiments (B-I) with four to five mice per group (Mean±SEM).
This result is consistent with the studies of Srivastava et al. (2014) suggesting that the responses of the antiviral effector T cells early during LCMV Armstrong infection are compromised. Indeed, while both the frequencies and absolute numbers of CD8+CD44+ T cells specific for GP33-41 and NP396-404 did not differ between IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice on day 14 post-infection (Fig 1B and 1C), the production of the effector cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α was markedly diminished (Fig 1E and 1F). While the frequency and absolute number of CD8+CD44+ T cells specific for GP276-286 were increased, the frequency of IFN-γ producing cells recognizing GP276-286 was still reduced (Fig 1D and 1G). We did observe a modest decrease in the frequency, but not absolute numbers of CD4+Foxp3-CD44+ T cells specific for LCMV GP66-76 (Fig 1H) and this was accompanied by a marked decrease in the production of both IFN-γ and TNF-α by the GP66-76 specific cells (Fig 1I).
Lack of IFNAR signaling results in higher numbers of activated Treg during LCMV Armstrong infection
Taken together, these studies are consistent with the possibility that the absence of signaling via the IFNAR in Tregs during LCMV Armstrong infection potentiated their suppressive activity resulting in a failure to fully activate LCMV-specific T effector cells [39]. We observed that Treg cell numbers from infected WT and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice on day 4 and day 5 are similar and that Treg cells from both the WT and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice decrease similarly on day 7 post-infection (S1B Fig). While Srivastava et al (2014) reported a marked decrease in WT Foxp3+ Tregs on day 7 post infection in mixed bone marrow chimeras, we did not observe a decrease in Tregs on day 5 and the reduction in Treg frequencies and absolute numbers on day 7 was seen in both IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (S1B Fig). In contrast, Foxp3+ Tregs frequencies and numbers were increased on day 14 post LCMV Armstrong infection in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice. Most notably, the percentages and absolute numbers of activated Tregs were increased in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice compared to IFNARfl/fl mice on day 5, 7 and 14 post Armstrong infection (S1C Fig). In addition to elevated levels of CD44, Tregs in IFNARflf/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice also expressed higher percentages of other activation markers, including Ki-67+, ICOS+ and TIGIT+ (S1D and S1E Fig), consistent with an activated phenotype and greater degree of proliferation at day 5 post Armstrong infection. We did not see any differences in the frequencies of activated CD4+Foxp3- and CD8+ T cells (S1F Fig) in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice.
Absence of IFNAR signaling potentiates viral persistence in chronic LCMV infection
The role of Tregs in the maintenance of chronic viral infection and effector T cell exhaustion has been difficult to define as it has been technically challenging to specifically deplete Tregs without the induction of autoimmune disease [40–42]. To evaluate the role of IFNAR signaling in Tregs during persistent chronic viral infection, mice were infected with LCMV Cl-13. We initially examined viral titers by plaque assay in serum at different time points during infection. On days 8, 25, 35 and 43-post infection, IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice had significantly higher viral titers compared to IFNARfl/fl mice, and as expected IFNAR-/- mice had significantly higher titers than IFNARfl/fl mice (Fig 2A). Notably, both the lungs and kidneys of IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice on day 46 post infection had significantly higher viral titers than IFNARfl/fl controls (Fig 2B). These data indicate that IFNAR deficiency specifically in Tregs enhances LCMV persistence.
(A) LCMV titers were determined from Cl-13 infected IFNARfl/fl, IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre, and IFNAR-/- mice sera on indicated days. (B) Lung and kidney tissues from day 46 Cl-13 infected IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were assessed for detection of LCMV. (C) IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice spleen cells on day 25 and day 46 Cl-13 infection were analyzed for Foxp3+ Treg among CD4+ T cells. (D) CD44+ and CD62L+ cells were determined within gated Foxp3+ T cells on indicated days during chronic LCMV infection. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data are shown from three to four experiments (A) involving three to fourteen mice, representative of two independent experiments (B) from four mice per group, and two to three experiments (C and D) on indicated days involving six to thirteen mice per group (Mean±SEM).
The persistence of Cl-13 infection among IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice led us to examine the kinetics and activation of Tregs during chronic LCMV infection. The frequencies and absolute numbers of Tregs were higher in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice on day 25-post infection, but not on day 46-post infection (Fig 2C). However, the activation state of the Tregs as measured by CD44 expression was higher on both days 25 and 46 in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice compared to IFNARfl/fl mice (Fig 2D). In contrast, no significant differences were observed in the frequencies or absolute numbers of CD4+Foxp3- or CD8+ T cells and their levels of CD44 expression on day 25 post-infection; however, on day 46 post-infection, the percentages of CD4+Foxp3-CD44hi T cells were higher in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (S2A–S2D Fig). Furthermore, Cl-13 infected IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice exhibited greater morbidity as manifest by a greater reduction in body weight than IFNARfl/fl mice (S2E Fig). Taken together, these results demonstrate similar to acute infection, failure of signaling via the IFNAR in Tregs results in enhanced Treg activation accompanied by decreased viral clearance.
Absence of IFNAR signaling in Tregs results in decreased virus-specific cytokine production and enhanced virus-specific T effector cell exhaustion
To determine if the enhanced Treg activation and diminished viral clearance in Cl-13 infected IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice results in decreased antiviral T effector cell responses, we examined the LCMV-specific responses of effector T cells. On day 25-post infection, both the absolute numbers of GP33 and NP396 tetramer positive T cells were similar (Fig 3A and 3B), while the frequencies of IFN-γ and TNF-α producing cells were lower (Fig 3C and 3D). However, on day 46-post infection, the absolute numbers of both antigen-specific CD8+ T cells were significantly decreased (Fig 3A and 3B) and this was accompanied by a marked decrease in the frequencies and absolute numbers of IFN-γ and TNF-α producing cells (Fig 3C and 3D). A moderate increase in the absolute number of CD4+Foxp3-CD44+GP66 Tet+ T cells frequencies was observed in the IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice on day 46-post infection, but not on day-25 post infection (S3A Fig). However, only low levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α were produced and no differences were observed in cytokine production by CD4+Foxp3-CD44+GP66 Tet+ T cells among IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice on both day 25 and 46-post infection (S3B Fig). Thus, decreased IFNAR signaling in Tregs resulted in reduced number and frequencies of CD8+ virus specific IFN-γ and TNF-α producing cells.
(A and B) Spleen cells of chronic LCMV infected (days 25 and 46) IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were analyzed for GP33 Tet+ and NP396 Tet+ T cells within CD8+CD44+ T cells. (C and D) Spleen cells from (days 25 and 46) Cl-13 infected mice were stimulated with GP33, NP396, and Golgi stop for 5 hours at 37 oC. Frequencies and absolute numbers of IFN-γ+ and TNF-α+ cytokine producing cells within CD8+CD44+GP33 Tet+ and CD8+CD44+NP396 Tet+ T cells are shown. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data shown (A-D) from a representative and two experiments involving three to eight mice per group (Mean±SEM).
High levels of PD-1 expression are one of the hallmarks of T cell exhaustion. On both days 25- and 46-post infection, the frequency of PD1 expressing CD8+ and CD4+Foxp3- T cells were higher in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (Fig 4A and 4B). Two other markers of T cell exhaustion, the transcription factor eomesodermin (EOMES), and CD39 can be co-expressed with PD-1 on exhausted T cells [43, 44]. Higher percentages and absolute numbers of EOMES+PD-1+ cells within the CD8+ and CD4+Foxp3- populations were present in the IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (Fig 4C and 4D). Correspondingly, PD1+CD39+ frequencies and total numbers were higher in gated CD8+ T cells from IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (Fig 4E). While the frequencies of gated CD4+Foxp3-PD1+CD39+ T cells did not differ between IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfll/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice, the absolute numbers of CD4+Foxp3-PD1+CD39+ T cells were higher in Treg-specific IFNAR deficient mice (Fig 4F). Similarly, the frequencies of PD-1+ T cells were greater among gated CD8+CD44+GP33 and CD8+CD44+GP276 Tet+ T cells in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (Fig 4G and 4H). CD8+CD44+NP396 Tet+ and CD4+Foxp3-CD44+GP66 Tet+ populations from day 46 Cl-13 infected IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice also had higher proportions of PD1 expressing cells (S4A and S4B Fig). In addition, it has been demonstrated that Tregs with higher levels of PD1 expression can mediate enhanced suppression in LCMV infection [45], we also found that Tregs from Cl-13 infected IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice had significantly higher expression of PD1 than controls on days 25 and 35 post infection (S4C Fig). These data demonstrate that the enhanced Treg suppression seen in the absence of IFNAR signaling during Cl-13 infection results in markedly reduced cytokine production by virus-specific CD8+ T cells as well as a phenotype consistent with exhaustion.
(A and B) Kinetics of PD1 expression was shown on gated CD8+ and CD4+Foxp3- T cells during chronic LCMV infection. (C and D) Percentage and total numbers of PD1+ EOMES+ cells among gated CD8+ and CD4+Foxp3- T cells were plotted from days 25, and 46 Cl-13 infected mice. (E and F) PD1+CD39+ cells frequencies and numbers were estimated within CD8+ T and CD4+Foxp3- T cells from day 46 Cl-13 infected mice. (G and H) PD1 expression was evaluated within CD8+CD44+GP33 and CD8+CD44+GP276 Tet+ T cells from Cl-13 infected mice on indicated days. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data represent from two to five experiments (A and B), representative of two experiments (C-H), on indicated days with three to four mice per group in each experiment (Mean±SEM).
Absence of IFNAR signaling on Tregs results in defective generation of memory T cells in LCMV infection
Exhausted CD8+ T cells have reduced memory cell potential which is secondary to higher LCMV antigen persistence in infected mice [46]. To determine whether the enhanced T cell exhaustion phenotype observed in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice is associated with a reduction in the formation of virus-specific memory T cells, we examined the levels of expression of three memory cell makers (CD62L, CD127, CXCR3) on gated CD8+CD44+ GP276 Tet+ T cells (Fig 5A). The frequencies and the absolute numbers of all three memory populations were reduced in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice on day 46 post infection compared to IFNARfl/fl control mice (Fig 5B–5D). Similar results were seen within the CD8+CD44+GP33 Tet+ population (S5A–S5D Fig). While the number of memory CD8+ T cells is usually inversely correlated with terminally differentiated T cells as measured by KLRG-1 expression [47], the frequencies and absolute numbers of CD8+CD44+GP276/GP33 Tet+ KLRG-1+ T cells were also lower in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (Fig 5E and S5E Fig). We further examined the protective capacity of memory CD8+ T cells by re-infecting the day 30 Armstrong infected mice with Cl-13 virus. On day 5 post Cl-13 infection, IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice had reduced frequencies and numbers of CD8+CD44+NP396 Tet+ cells, and in addition GP33- and GP276-stimulated CD8+CD44+ T cells from IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre infected mice produced significantly less Granzyme B (GrB) positive and GrB/IFN-γ double positive cells compared to CD8+ T cells from control mice (Fig 5F and 5G), however IFN-γ positive cells are tended to be more in infected IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice but they are not significant compared to control mice. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the higher load of virus is associated with a defect in the generation of virus-specific memory T cells in the absence of IFNAR signaling in Tregs.
(A) Spleen cells of chronic LCMV infected (day 46) IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were analyzed for frequencies and absolute numbers of GP276 Tet+ T cells. Frequencies and absolute numbers of CD62L+ (B), CD127+ (C), CXCR3+ (D), and KLRG1+ (E) cells were determined within gated CD8+CD44+GP276 Tet+ T cells (as in A). Splenocytes harvested on day 5 Cl-13 recall challenge after day 30 LCMV Armstrong infection (memory phase), and CD8+CD44+ T cells were analyzed for frequencies and absolute numbers of NP396 Tet+ T cells (F). Spleen cells from Cl-13 recall challenge were stimulated with GP33, GP276, and Golgi stop for 5 hours at 37 oC, frequencies and absolute numbers of CD8+CD44+ T cells producing Granzyme B, and IFN-γ were analyzed (G). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data derived from one to two experiments involving three to eight mice per group (Mean±SEM).
Transcriptional profiling of Tregs during Armstrong and Cl-13 infection
In order to better understand the molecular basis for the enhanced activation and suppressive function of Tregs from Treg-specific IFNAR-deficient mice during acute and chronic LCMV infection, we performed high-throughput RNA sequencing on sorted CD4+YFP+ Tregs isolated from day 5 Armstrong-infected Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed distinct clustering of Tregs from Foxp3YFP-Cre mice relative to Tregs from IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (Fig 6A). A total of 586 genes were significantly differentially expressed (249 genes were down, and 337 genes were up) in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05) (Fig 6B). Among the 586 genes, 174 genes were identified in the interferome database [48] (interferome.its.monash.edu.au) as IFN-signaling related (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05) (S6A Fig), and were excluded from further analysis. We elected to exclude IFNAR regulated genes in order to perform an unbiased downstream analysis, as IFNAR signaling regulates the transcription of up to 2000 genes. The remaining 412 differentially expressed genes were exclusively non-IFN related. Of these, 156 genes were upregulated in infected Foxp3YFP-Cre mice, and 256 genes were upregulated in infected IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of the 412 non-IFN related genes revealed that the natural Treg vs conventional T cell gene set was enriched to a greater extent in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice [36 genes out of 42 were in core enrichment, Enrichment score (ES): 0.566, P < 0.01, FDR:0.0] (Fig 6C). We observed that 32 out of 412 non-IFN related genes were differentially expressed (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05, genes normalized by z-score; 24 genes in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice and 8 genes in Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were upregulated) and could be classified as Treg-signature genes as previously reported [49, 50] (Fig 6D). Representative upregulated genes in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice include Areg, Arhpag20, Bub1b, Ccl12, Ccr5, Il1r1, Mki67 (Ki67), Ncf1, Nrp2, Tnfrsf9 (CD137), Tcf19, Uhrf1, and Wnt3; representative downregulated genes in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre include Cybb, Dapl1, Fam160a1, Il1r2, and Tnfsf8 (CD153). Some of the above upregulated genes from Tregs include Areg, Ccl12, Mki67, Ncf1, Tnfrsf9, Uhrf1 are well characterized to modulate the enhanced Treg suppressive and proliferative function [49, 50]. Further, we also performed ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) for non-IFN related genes which resulted in 45-top canonical pathways (adjusted p value < 0.1) (S6B Fig). Specifically, cell cycle: G2/M DNA damage checkpoint regulation pathway (genes involved: Aurka, Ccnb2, Cdk1, and Top2a), cyclins and cell cycle regulation pathway (genes involved: Ccnb2, Ccne2, Cdk1, and E2f1) are enriched positively in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre Tregs compared to Tregs from Foxp3YFP-Cre mice, suggesting that cell cycle genes are more functional in Treg-specific IFNAR deficient mice. Furthermore, the c-AMP mediated signaling pathway (genes involved: Akap1, Camk2b, Chrm4, Crem, Fpr1, Prkar1b, and Ptger3) is also enriched positively in IFNAR deficient Tregs. Through IPA, we analyzed non-IFN related genes for top networks based on co-expression, transcription factor binding site predictions and protein-protein interactions. The top two networks identified included cell cycle, DNA replication, recombination, repair, cancer; and cellular movement, hematological system development and function and immune cell trafficking (S6C Fig), differential expression of these associated genes in the pathways are shown (S1 and S2 Tables). Some of the associated genes in the networks include, transcription factors: Depdc1, E2f1, E2f8, Foxm1, Mybl2, and Uhrf1 are downregulated, and pydc4/Ifi16 (interferon gamma inducible protein 16) is upregulated in Tregs from Foxp3YFP-Cre mice; cell cycle kinases: Ccnb2, Aurkb, and Chek1 are also downregulated in Foxp3YFP-Cre mice Tregs; immune cell genes such Tnfrsf9 (CD137), Ccl2, Ccr5, and Il1r1 are downregulated, in contrast C5ar1, CD19, Il1r2, Itga2b (CD41), Ly6c1, and Tlr7 are upregulated in Foxp3YFP-Cre mice Tregs. We also tested whether the reduced cell cycle gene signature in Tregs from Foxp3YFP-Cre mice contributed to a greater degree of apoptosis, but Active caspase-3 staining showed no significant increase in the staining of Tregs from day 5 Armstrong infected Foxp3YFP-Cre mice compared to Tregs from IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (S6D Fig).
(A) PCA was performed on day 5 LCMV Armstrong infected Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice sorted CD4+YFP+ Treg cells RNA-seq samples (4 samples in each group). (B) Scatter plot showing the comparison of global gene expression profiles of Tregs between Armstrong infected Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice. Total of 586 genes were significantly differentially expressed and colored, 249 genes (red) were down regulated, and 337 genes (blue) upregulated in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05). (C) GSEA for non-IFN related genes, showing enrichment plot for natural Treg vs. T conv DN gene set (36 out 42 genes were enriched in core, Enrichment score: 0.566, P < 0.01, FDR: 0.0) with positive enrichment in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice Tregs relative to Foxp3YFP-Cre mice Tregs. (D) Heat map showing the significant differential expression of 32 Treg-signature genes (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05), as previously reported [49, 50], differentially expressed genes were normalized by z-score. (E) PCA was performed on day 25 LCMV Cl-13 infected Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice sorted CD4+YFP+ Treg cells RNA-seq samples (5 samples in each group). (F) Scatter plot showing the comparison of global gene expression profiles of Tregs between Cl-13 infected Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice. Total of 36 genes were significantly differentially expressed and colored, 23 genes (red) were down regulated, and 13 genes (blue) upregulated in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05). (G) Heat map showing the significant differential expression of 22 non-IFN related genes (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05, normalized by z-score). (H) Heat map showing the significant differential expression of 14 genes from LCMV Armstrong infected Foxp3YFP-Cre mice and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice Tregs, which were in consistent with transcriptome from LCMV Cl-13 infected mice Tregs (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05, normalized by z-score). Armstrong infection transcriptome data obtained from an experiment involving four mice per group (A-D and H), and transcriptome data from Cl-13 infection, involved an experiment with five mice per group (E-G).
In parallel, we also performed RNA sequencing on Tregs from day 25 post LCMV Cl-13 infection. PCA showed less distinct clustering (Fig 6E), and surprisingly, only 36 genes were significantly differentially expressed (23 genes were downregulated, and 13 genes were upregulated in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice, fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05) in Tregs from Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (Fig 6F). Among those differentially expressed genes, 14 genes were identified in the interferome database [48] as IFN-signaling related (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05) (S7A Fig). Of the remaining 22 genes, 11 genes were upregulated in their expression in Tregs from Foxp3YFP-Cre mice and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice, respectively (Fig 6G). Additionally, IPA for non-IFN related genes resulted in 18-top canonical pathways (adjusted p value < 0.1) (S7B Fig), importantly, c-AMP mediated signaling pathway (genes involved: Akap1, and Camk2b) is enriched positively in Cl-13 infected IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice Tregs, this was shown similar pattern in Armstrong infected IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice. One of the top networks for non-IFN related genes include lipid metabolism, molecular transport and small molecule biochemistry (S7C Fig). Few of the associated genes in the network include, kinases: Camk2b, and Hunk and cytoplasmic enzymes: Cpta1, and Scpep1 are down regulated, while proapoptotic factor Erdr1 is upregulated in Foxp3YFP-Cre mice Tregs.
We identified fourteen genes (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05, normalized by z-score) differentially expressed in Tregs from LCMV Armstrong infected mice which were similarly differentially expressed in Tregs from LCMV Cl-13 infected mice including 7 that were up- and 7 down-regulated (Fig 6G and 6H). We further validated the differential expression of some of these non-IFN related genes during chronic infection which are common to both infection model or unique to chronic infection alone by quantitative real-time PCR (S7D Fig). Several of the upregulated genes include a-kinase anchoring protein 1 (Akap1), calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II b (Camk2b), Hormonally upregulated Neu-associated kinase (Hunk), Rab4a and Rasgrf2. Akap1 is associated with cAMP signaling, and it can act as a gap junction protein in facilitating the transfer of cAMP from Treg to effector T cells leading to inhibition of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling [51, 52]. Furthermore, CamK2b, Hunk, Rab4a and Rasgrf2 have also been implicated in enhancement of Treg function [53–57]. Taken together, all these upregulated genes participate in heightened Treg suppressive function observed in the Tregs from IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice during both acute and chronic LCMV infections.
Treg-specific IFNAR deficiency leads to an impaired antitumor immune response
Enhanced Treg cell function is very well documented in various tumor models and it has been associated with a poor prognosis [6]. To determine whether the absence of IFNAR signaling was associated with enhanced Treg suppression in a non-infectious setting, we utilized the mouse colon adenocarcinoma MC38 and mouse B16.F10 melanoma models. IFNARfl/f x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice showed higher tumor incidence (MC38: n = 11/11, 100%; B16.F10: n = 5/5, 100%) and significantly increased volume than IFNARfl/fl mice (MC38: n = 8/10 mice, 80%, B16.F10: n = 4/5, 80%) (Fig 7A, left and right panels). Tregs and CD4+Foxp3- cells isolated from tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) showed comparable frequencies in both strains of mice, however CD8+ T cell frequencies from TIL of IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were increased. Nevertheless, both CD4+Foxp3- and CD8+ T cells from IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice tended to proliferate less as assayed by Ki-67 expression (S8A–S8C Fig). Importantly, Tregs from IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice TIL expressed significantly higher levels of CD44, enhanced proliferation and expression of PD-1 (Fig 7B). Conversely, both CD4+Foxp3- and CD8+ TIL from IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice expressed lower levels of CD44 and markedly reduced levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α production compared to TIL from IFNARfl/fl mice (Fig 7C: gated on CD4+Foxp3- TILs and Fig 7D: gated on CD8+ TILs). These data strongly suggest that Tregs in TIL from IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice have enhanced suppressor activity in the tumor microenvironment and the phenotype of these Tregs within TIL closely resembles the activated hypersuppressive phenotype observed during acute and chronic LCMV infections.
(A) IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were injected with 2x105 MC38 cells (left panels) and or 1.25x105 B16.F10 cells (right panels) subcutaneously, tumor growth in individual mice (left panels) and in pooled mice (two individual experiments, right panels) tumor volumes were plotted. (B) TIL were isolated on day 18 of MC38 tumor burden and determined CD44+, Ki-67+ and PD1+ cells within gated CD4+Foxp3+ T cells. TIL from day 18 MC38-post tumor implants were stained for CD44+ within CD4+Foxp3- (C) and CD8+ T cells (D), and TIL were stimulated with cell stimulation cocktail containing PMA, ionomycin, Brefeldin A and monensin for 5 hours at 37 oC. Frequencies of IFN-γ+ and TNF-α+ cytokine producing cells within the gated CD4+Foxp3-CD44+ and CD8+CD44+ T cells are shown. * P < 0.05, and ** P < 0.01 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data shown from two individual experiments representing five to eleven mice per group (A), and a representative of two independent experiments (B-D) involving three to eight mice per group (Mean±SEM).
Discussion
Tregs mediate a multifaceted role in modulating the immune response to acute and chronic infectious agents. While their beneficial effects in decreasing immune pathology during the resolution phase of many infections is clear, Tregs can also mediate immune suppression resulting in pathogen persistence. During viral infections, rapid activation of the innate immune system generates inflammatory signals that can initially control the infection and ultimately influence the quality and magnitude of the adaptive antiviral effector T cell response. The best characterized innate inflammatory signals are the type I IFNs. During LCMV infection type I IFNs are produced in large quantities immediately following viral infection by plasmacytoid DCs as well as virus infected cells and primarily exert their effect on CD8+ T cells by extending their survival. In this report, we have demonstrated that type I IFNs can also exert beneficial effects by acting on Tregs to down-modulate their suppressive functions both early during the course of acute LCMV Armstrong infection and also later during virus persistence in chronic Cl-13 infection.
Srivastava et al. (2014), have previously examined the effects of type I IFN on Tregs during the course of acute LCMV infection. They concluded that type I IFNs down-modulated Treg function but postulated that the effects of type I IFNs were secondary to a selective decrease in the number of highly suppressive effector Tregs, and secondary to the pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative actions of type I IFNs early in the course of infection. The major difficulty in the interpretation of this study is that the experimental model they used did not allow them to selectively examine the effects of IFNs on Tregs in the absence of its effects on other cell types. Similarly, one previous study also showed that Tregs were reduced in infected wild type compared to control mice during first week post LCMV-Docile infection, but Tregs expanded to a greater extent from the second weeks onwards. Treg expansion was more pronounced in IL-21R deficient mice, suggesting IL-21 signaling restricts proliferation of Tregs during LCMV infection [58]. The availability of mice with a conditional deletion of the IFNAR in Tregs allowed us to dissect the mechanistic basis of IFNAR signaling in Tregs resulting in their reduced suppressive function and in more efficient antiviral and antitumor immune responses.
Similar to the previous study [39], we found that the generation of antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells was comparable in Treg-specific IFNAR-deficient mice and WT controls during acute LCMV infection, but that both the virus-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice produced markedly reduced amounts of IFN-γ and TNF-α accompanied by a slower rate of viral clearance than the controls. Most importantly, we did not observe a decrease in the percentages or absolute numbers of Tregs in the WT control mice that differed from IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice on day 4 or 5 post-infection. We did detect a decrease in Tregs in the IFNARfl/fl X Foxp3YFP-Cre mice on day 7 post-infection, but we observed an identical decrease in Tregs in the control IFNARfl/fl mice. In contrast to the loss of memory/effector Tregs observed in WT mice by Srivastava et al. (2014), we observed an enhanced percentage of memory/effector Treg as defined by CD44 expression on days 5, 7 and 14 post-infection in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice, as well as higher levels of expression of Ki-67, ICOS and TIGIT. Taken together, our results are most consistent with an enhanced suppressive phenotype of Tregs in the absence of IFNAR signaling in acute virus infection albeit the mice ultimately cleared the infection.
We observed a similar but more profound suppressive phenotype in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice following Cl-13 infection, as the mice had higher serum titers of virus and also had higher viral titers in lungs and kidneys for as long as 46 days post infection. We observed decreased numbers of antiviral antigen-specific CD8+ T cells accompanied by a profound decrease in effector cytokine production. Increased viral persistence resulted in marked expression of markers associated with T cell exhaustion (PD-1, CD39, EOMES) [43, 44, 46] and decrease in generation of antigen-specific memory CD8+ T cells. The decrease in the formation of memory T cells in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice in Cl-13 infection should be contrasted to the effects of IL-10 producing Treg cells in augmenting memory T cell formation following Armstrong infection [47]. Slight increases in both the percentages, but not the absolute numbers of Tregs were seen on days 25 and 46 post infection. However, at both times points, we observed a significant increase in the percentages of activated/effector Tregs. To determine if the hyperactivated/hypersuppressive phenotype observed in the absence of IFNAR signaling in Tregs was unique to viral infections, we also examined the responses of IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice to transplantable tumor models. Markedly enhanced growth of the tumor was observed in these mice accompanied by an enhanced percentage of activated PD-1+ tumor infiltrating Tregs. In addition, the activation and cytokine production by both CD4+Foxp3- and CD8+ tumor infiltrating T cells were markedly suppressed. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that IFNAR signaling in Tregs plays a critical role in down-modulating, but certainly not abolishing, their suppressive function and may in viral infections orchestrate the balance between immunopathology and eradication of the virus.
To begin to elucidate the mechanistic basis for the suppressive function of IFNAR-deficient Tregs during both acute and Cl-13 infection, we performed high-throughput RNA sequencing of Foxp3+ Tregs from both controls and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice on day 5 Armstrong and day 25 Cl-13 infection. A group of Treg-signature genes (Areg, Arhpag20, Bub1b, Ccl12, Ccr5, Il1r1, Mki67 (Ki67) Ncf1, Nrp2, Tnfrsf9, Tcf19, Uhrf1, and Wnt3) were expressed at higher levels in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice than WT controls on day 5 Armstrong infection. These genes have previously been identified as Treg-Up signature genes [49, 50] and their enhanced expression is consistent with the hyperactivated phenotype of the Tregs at that time point. We did not observe upregulation of this group of genes on day 25 of Cl-13 infection. Interestingly, both in Armstrong and Cl-13 infection, we observed the differential expression of a number of genes in IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre Tregs which might also play a role in their enhanced suppressive function including Akap1, Camk2b, Rasgrf2 and Hunk. Akap1, which serves as a gap junction protein, is involved in transferring pools of cAMP from Treg to effector T cells resulting in inhibition of TCR signaling [51, 52]. Camk2b participates in the activation of nuclear factor kappa-B, which in turn plays a role in Treg development by stabilizing Foxp3 [53, 54]. Both Camk2b and Hunk have been shown to be have higher levels of expression in human Tregs than conventional effector T cells [55]. Lastly, Rasgrf2 is involved in stimulation of TCR signaling through activation of nuclear factor for activated T cells (NF-AT) [57]. Conversely, we also observed group of genes (Erdr1, Rell1, Tlr7) whose expression is downregulated in Tregs from both IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre Armstrong and Cl-13 infected mice. These genes have been described as potentially playing a role in apoptosis [59–61] and thus may be involved in the reduced suppressive function of Tregs after IFNAR signaling. We did not observe any differences between IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre and WT mouse Tregs in expression of Active caspase-3 on day 5 post Armstrong infection again consistent with our data that cell death is not playing a role in reduced Treg suppression in WT mice, although, we cannot exclude the involvement of other cell death pathways. Future studies involving over expression and/or deletion of these genes in Tregs will be needed to specifically implicate one or several of these genes in Treg-mediated suppression during viral infections. We have not yet performed similar gene expression studies in IFNAR sufficient and deficient Tregs derived from the tumor microenvironment and compared such data with Tregs from LCMV-infected mice.
Our study demonstrates that one of the multiple cellular targets of Type I IFNs during viral infection are Treg cells and that the functional result of this interaction is a downregulation of Treg suppressor function. A similar process may take place in the tumor microenvironment and may be responsible for some of the antitumor effects of this group of cytokines [62, 63]. Thus, type I IFNs should be added to the long list of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-15, IL-21) [64–72] and members of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily (TNFSF) (GITR-L, 4-1BB-L, OX40-L and TNF-α) [73–76] that are purported to decrease Treg suppressive function in autoimmune and infectious disease models. However, the abrogation of suppression is more frequently mediated by the action of the cytokine or TNFSF member on the responder T cells resulting in resistance to suppression [73, 77], whereas we have definitively demonstrated that Tregs are the targets cells in this model. While type I IFNs may attenuate Treg suppression, it remains clear that the major and undefined cellular target for the immunosuppressive effects of type I IFNs in chronic LCMV infection is not the Tregs, as IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice have elevated viral titers, while LCMV Cl-13 infected mice treated with a neutralizing antibody against IFNAR have decreased viral titers [33, 34]. Thus, an approach to target IFNAR in normal hosts for inhibition of Treg suppressive function in chronic infection or in cancer would be difficult.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol No: LI-5E).
Mice
Foxp3YFP-Cre (expressing Cre recombinase regulated by Foxp3 promoter) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). IFNAR-/- mice were obtained by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and maintained in Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY). IFNARfl/fl mice were generously provided by Ulrich Kalinke (Paul-Ehrlich Institut, Langen, Germany), and crossed with Foxp3YFP-Cre mice to generate Treg-lineage specific IFNAR-deficient mice. All strains of mice used in this study were age 8–12 weeks of age), gender matched, and bred in-house.
LCMV infection and plaque assay
LCMV Armstrong and Cl-13 viruses (Shevach Laboratory) were propagated in baby hamster kidney-21 fibroblast cells [American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA]. Viral titers were determined by plaque assay using Vero African-green-monkey kidney cells (ATCC). Viral stocks were frozen at -80 oC until use. Mice were infected with the diluted virus in 1x sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (Armstrong virus, 2x105 plaque forming unit (pfu)/mouse, i.p., or Cl-13 virus, 2x106 pfu/mouse, i.v.). LCMV titers in sera and organs were determined by plaque assay using Vero cells as described [78].
Lymphocytes isolation
Spleens were harvested from naive (uninfected) and infected mice on indicated days and homogenized the tissues using cell strainer (70 μm, Nest Scientific USA, Rahway, NJ). Red blood cells were lysed using sterile ACK lysing buffer [NH4Cl (0.15 M), KHCO3 (10 mM) and Na2EDTA (0.1 mM), pH 7.3]. Lymphocytes were washed, suspended in sterile complete medium [RPMI medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), L-glutamine (2 mM), sodium pyruvate (1 mM), HEPES (1 mM), non-essential amino acids (0.1 mM), 2-mercaptoethanol (50 μM), and penicillin and streptomycin (100 U/ml)], and total live cells were counted.
Cell surface, intracellular and tetramer staining
Cell surface staining was performed as described [79]. Briefly after harvest, spleen cells (3x106 cells) or tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were suspended in sterile complete medium. For surface staining, cells in staining buffer (PBS, 10% heat-inactivated FBS, and 0.05% sodium azide) were incubated for 30 min at 4 oC, then stained with the following surface murine conjugate antibodies: anti-CD4, anti-CD62L, anti-CD39, anti-CD127, anti-IFNAR1, anti-B220 (all are from eBioscience, San Diego, CA); anti-CD8a, anti-CD44, anti-TIGIT (all are from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA); anti-PD1, anti-KLRG1, anti-CXCR3, and anti-ICOS (all are from BioLegend, San Diego, CA) and live/dead fixable aqua dead cell stain kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). For intracellular Foxp3, Ki67, Eomes and YFP detection, fixation and permeabilization were done according to the manufacturer’s guidelines (Foxp3 transcription factor buffer set, eBioscience) and cells stained with anti-Foxp3, anti-Ki67, anti-Eomes (eBioscience), and anti-GFP rabbit polyclonal antibody (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). For intracellular cytokine detection, spleen cells (3x106) in complete medium were stimulated with LCMV peptides (Research Technologies Brach, Protein Chemistry, NIAID): GP33-41 (GP33, 1 μg/ml), GP 276–286 (GP276, 1 μg/ml), NP396-404 (NP396, 1 μg/ml) and GP 61–80 (GP61, 10 μg/ml) along with GolgiStop (2 mM/ml, BD Biosciences) for 5 hrs at 37 oC. TIL were stimulated with cell stimulation cocktail (eBioscience) containing PMA, ionomycin, Brefeldin A, and monensin for 5 hrs at 37 oC. Later cells were washed, fixed and permeabilized and stained with intracellular cytokine antibodies (anti-IFN-γ and anti-GrB, BD Biosciences, and anti-TNF-α, eBioscience) for overnight at 4 oC. For MHC class I tetramer staining, H-2Db GP33, H-2Db GP276 and H-2Db NP396 (NIH tetramer core facility) were used at 1:100 dilutions and staining was done at 4 oC for 1 hr, and for MHC class II tetramers, IAb GP66-77 (GP66) (NIH tetramer core facility) used at 1:75 dilution and staining performed for 90 mins at 37 oC. Cells were washed and acquired by BD LSRII and LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) flow cytometers with FASCDiva software.
Cell sorting
Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice (four to five mice per group) were infected with Armstrong and Cl-13 virus. On day 5 post Armstrong and day 25 post Cl-13 infection, spleen and lymph nodes were harvested and single cell suspension were prepared. T cells were isolated by labeling single suspension with CD90.2 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA) and purified through LS columns (Miltenyi Biotec). Purified T cells were stained with anti-CD4 (RM 4–5) for 30 minutes on ice and CD4+YFP+ cells (5x105/sample) sorted (purity ~95%) by using FACSAria flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
Gene expression profiling and bioinformatics analysis
Armstrong (day 5) and chronic LCMV infected (day 25) Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/flxFoxp3YFP-Cre mice CD4+YFP+ sorted cells were lysed in RLT buffer (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Total RNA was extracted using Qiagen AllPrep 96 DNA/RNA kit as described by the manufacturer (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), with one exception prior to the extraction, the RLT lysate was homogenized using Qiagen QIAShredder columns (Qiagen) to shear any contaminating gDNA. Samples were then subjected to on-column Dnase I treatment. All steps were performed using PCR amplicon-free laboratory equipment to further minimize background signal during RNA sequencing and library generation. A 150 ng aliquot from each sample was individually adjusted to 50 μl using nuclease-free water. Each sample was processed using Truseq Stranded mRNA Sample Preparation, Rev. E (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) using the included barcodes with the following modification: post-amplification libraries were purified with Ampure XP beads twice. The resulting DNA libraries were fragment-sized using a DNA1000 Bioanalyzer Chip (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and quantitated using KAPA Library Quant Kit with universal qPCR Mix (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA) on a CFX96 Real-Time System (BioRad, Hercules, CA). All eight-ten samples were diluted to a 2 nM working stock and pooled using equal volume amounts. An 11 pM titration point was used to cluster a paired end, RAPID 2-lane flowcell on a Hiseq 2500 DNA sequencer (Illumina). Libraries were run as 2 x 100 bp paired end reads on 2 lanes of an Illumina Hiseq 2500 sequencer, which produced ~28.7 million reads per sample. Reads were trimmed for adapter sequence and filtered for low quality sequence using the FASTX-Toolkit. Remaining reads were mapped to the mouse genome assembly mm10 using Hisat2 [80]. Reads mapping to genes were counted using htseq-count [81]. Differential expression analysis was performed using the Bioconductor package DESeq2 [82]. Further analysis was performed using Partek Genomic Suite (Partek Incorporated) and Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) is used for obtaining top canonical pathways, networks based on co-expression, transcription factor binding sites and protein-protein interactions.
Gene set enrichment analysis
GSEA were performed on the set of 412 genes (Armstrong infection) using GSEA v2.2.3 from The Broad Institute [83]. GSEA was run using molecular signature database v.5.2 gene sets, except the C1: positional gene sets, with 1000 permutations and all default parameters except minimum size of 5.
Real time quantitative PCR
Total RNA samples from Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were extracted as described in the NGS gene expression profiling method section. cDNAs were prepared from Superscript IV first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Presynthesized Taqman gene expression assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used to amplify Akap1, Car2, Cpe, Eomes, Erdr1, Gpat2, Rab4a, Rell1, Rasgrf2, Sdc3, Tlr7, and Actb was used as internal control. Real time qPCR was performed using QuantStudio7 Flex Real time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using Taqman universal master mix II with UNG (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Target gene expressions were calculated by 2-dct and expressed as relative to Actb.
Tumor models
Murine colon adenocarcinoma cells, MC38 cells (ATCC) and melanoma cells, B16.F10 (ATCC) were grown in complete DMEM medium [DMEM/RPMI supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, L-glutamine (2 mM), sodium pyruvate (1 mM), HEPES (1 mM), non-essential amino acids (0.1 mM), 2-mercaptoethanol (50 μM), and penicillin and streptomycin (100 U/ml)]. Sex- and age-matched IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/flxFoxp3YFP-Cre mice were injected with 2x105 MC38 cells and or 1.25x105 B16.F10 cells diluted in sterile 1xPBS, subcutaneously (right flank region). Tumor growths were measured in regular intervals by digital calipers (Fisher Scientific), and tumor volumes were calculated by the formulas: length x width x depth. On day 18 post tumor implant, tumors were excised in sterile conditions, and TIL were prepared after the mincing the tumor, and digesting with 1x HBSS containing collagenase type IV (0.5mg/ml), Dnase I (0.1 mg/ml) and Hyaluronidase (2.5 units/ml) for 1 hr at 37 oC. Later, digested cells were washed and treated with ACK lysing buffer to lyse RBCs, and then TIL were purified by density gradient centrifugation using buffered percoll (Sigma-Aldrich, 80%/40%).
Quantification and statistical analysis
Flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo software version 10.2 and or 10.3 (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR). Graphs were prepared by GraphPad Prism software version 7.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc. La Jolla, CA). Statistical analysis was done through unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. All data in the graphs presented as Mean±SEM values, and error bars represent SEM. Data were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05, and represented as * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Lack of IFNAR signaling in Tregs leads to higher Treg numbers and enhanced activation during LCMV Armstrong infection.
(A) Representative dot plots demonstrating the deletion of IFNAR on gated CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs of IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre naive mice. (B) Spleen cells from naive, D4, D5, D7 and D14 LCMV Armstrong infected IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were analyzed for CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs, CD4+Foxp3- and CD8+ effector T cell frequencies and total numbers. (C) Frequencies and absolute numbers of CD4+Foxp3+CD44hi within CD4+Foxp3+ T cells of naive, D5, D7 and D14 Armstrong infected IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice. Splenocytes from day 5 LCMV Armstrong infected mice were analyzed for frequencies and absolute numbers of Ki-67+ (D), ICOS+, and TIGIT+ cells (E) among CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs. (F) Spleen cells from day 7 Armstrong infected mice were analyzed for CD44hi cells within gated CD4+Foxp3- T cells and CD8+ T cells. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data are shown from more than five experiments (A), three experiments for naive and two experiments (D4, D5, D7 and D14 infected mice) (B and C), and a representative experiment of two experiments (D, E, F). Each experiment involved groups of four to five mice (Mean±SEM).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006985.s001
(TIF)
S2 Fig. CD4+ and CD8+ effector T cells kinetics and morbidity during chronic LCMV infection.
(A and B) Spleen cells from Day 25 and day 46 Cl-13 infected IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were analyzed for frequencies and absolute numbers of CD4+Foxp3- and CD4+Foxp3-CD44hi T cells. (C and D) Spleen cells from Day 25 and day 46 Cl-13 infected IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were analyzed for frequencies and absolute numbers of CD8+ and CD8+ CD44hi T cells. (E) Body weights were measured on regular intervals, and % change in body weights during chronic LCMV infection were shown. ** P < 0.01, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data are shown from two to four experiments (A-E) on indicated days involving six to thirteen mice per group (Mean±SEM).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006985.s002
(TIF)
S3 Fig. Absence of IFNAR signaling in Tregs results in a modest increase of virus-specific CD4+Foxp3- T cells.
(A) Spleen cells from chronic LCMV infected (day 25 and day 46) IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were analyzed for GP66 Tet+ within CD4+Foxp3-CD44+ T cells. (B) Spleen cells from day 25 and day 46 Cl-13 infected mice were stimulated with GP61. Frequencies and absolute numbers of IFN-γ+ and TNF-α+ cytokine producing cells within CD4+Foxp3-CD44+GP66 Tet+ T cells are shown. * P < 0.05 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data are shown from one to two representative experiments (A and B) involving three to eight mice per group (Mean±SEM).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006985.s003
(TIF)
S4 Fig. Absence of IFNAR signaling in Tregs results in enhanced virus-specific T cell exhaustion.
PD1 expression was evaluated within CD8+CD44+NP396 Tet+ T cells (A), and CD4+Foxp3-CD44+GP66 Tet+ T cells (B) from day 46 Cl-13 infected mice. (C) Kinetics of PD1 expression is shown on gated CD4+Foxp3+ T cells during chronic LCMV infection. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data are shown from a representative of two experiments (A and B), and from five experiments (C) with three to four mice per group in each experiment (Mean±SEM).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006985.s004
(TIF)
S5 Fig. Absence of IFNAR signaling on Tregs results in defective generation of memory T cells in chronic LCMV infection.
(A) Spleen cells from chronic LCMV infected (day 46) IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were analyzed for frequencies and absolute numbers of GP33 Tet+ T cells. Frequencies and absolute numbers of CD62L+ (B), CD127+ (C), CXCR3+ (D), and KLRG1+ (E) cells were determined within gated CD8+CD44+GP33 Tet+ T cells as in A. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data obtained from a representative of two experiments (A-E) involving four mice per group in each experiment (Mean± SEM).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006985.s005
(TIF)
S6 Fig. Transcriptional profile and Active caspase-3 detection in Tregs during acute LCMV infection.
(A) Day 5 LCMV Armstrong infected Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice sorted CD4+YFP+ Treg cells were analyzed through RNA-seq (4 samples in each group), heat map showing the significant differential expression of 174 IFN-related genes, differentially expressed genes were normalized by z-score (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05). (B) Top canonical pathways derived from IPA of differentially expressed non-IFN related genes from Tregs of Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/flxFoxp3YFP-Cre mice during day 5 LCMV Armstrong infection were shown (adjusted p value < 0.1). (C) Top two networks were obtained by IPA based on co-expression, transcription factor binding site predictions and protein-protein interactions (genes in green are downregulated, whereas red are upregulated in Foxp3YFP-Cre mice). (D) Frequencies and total numbers of CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs positive for Active Casapse-3 cells are shown from day 5 acute LCMV infected mice. Transcriptome data obtained from an experiment involving four mice per group (A-C), and Active caspase-3 detection involved an experiment with four to five mice per group (D).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006985.s006
(TIF)
S7 Fig. Transcriptional profile analysis and validation of some of the genes in chronic LCMV infection.
(A) Day 25 LCMV Cl-13 infected Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice sorted CD4+YFP+ Treg cells were analyzed through RNA-seq (5 samples in each group), heat map showing the significant differential expression of 14 IFN-related genes, differentially expressed genes were normalized by z-score (fold change 1.5 and above, adjusted P < 0.05). (B) Top canonical pathways obtained from IPA of differentially expressed non-IFN related genes from Tregs of Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/flxFoxp3YFP-Cre mice during day 25 LCMV Cl-13 infection were shown (adjusted p value < 0.1). (C) Top network is derived by IPA based on co-expression, transcription factor binding site predictions and protein-protein interactions (genes in green are downregulated, whereas red are upregulated in Foxp3YFP-Cre mice). (D) Sorted CD4+YFP+ T cells cDNA samples from LCMV Cl-13 (post day 25) infected Foxp3YFP-Cre and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were subjected to qPCR analysis. Gene expressions of Akap1, Car2, Cpe, Eomes, Erdr1, Gpat2, Rab4a, Rasgrf2, Rell1, Sdc3, and Tlr7 were calculated in relative to the Actb expression. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). U.D., undetectable levels. Transcriptome data obtained from an experiment involving five mice per group (A-C), and data is a representative of an experiment involving five samples obtained from five mice per group (D) (Mean±SEM).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006985.s007
(TIF)
S8 Fig. Effector T cells proliferate less in MC38 tumor induced IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice.
(A) IFNARfl/fl and IFNARfl/fl x Foxp3YFP-Cre mice were injected with 2x105 MC38 cells subcutaneously. On day 18 post tumor implantation TIL were isolated, CD4+Foxp3+ T cell frequencies were ascertained. (B and C) Ki67 expression by tumor infiltrating CD4+Foxp3- and CD8+ T cells was evaluated. * P < 0.05 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test). Data shown from two experiments (A), and from a representative of two independent experiments (B and C) involving three to five mice per group in each experiment (Mean±SEM).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006985.s008
(TIF)
S1 Table. Differential expression of genes associated with cell cycle, DNA replication, recombination, repair and cancer.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006985.s009
(XLSX)
S2 Table. Differential expression of genes associated with cellular movement, hematological system development and function, immune cell trafficking.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006985.s010
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
Authors thank Anita Mora, visual information specialist, for graphic art help, Daniel Bruno, NGS Chemist, for technical assistance in RNA-sequencing, Dr. Bishop Hague, Flow Cytometry Section, NIAID for the assistance in cell sorting, NIH Tetramer Core Facility for providing the tetramers used in this study, and Dr. Shoba Amarnath, New Castle University, for critical reading of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Fontenot JD, Rudensky AY. A well adapted regulatory contrivance: regulatory T cell development and the forkhead family transcription factor Foxp3. Nature immunology. 2005;6(4):331–7. pmid:15785758.
- 2. Sakaguchi S. Naturally arising CD4+ regulatory t cells for immunologic self-tolerance and negative control of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:531–62. pmid:15032588.
- 3. Shevach EM. Mechanisms of foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression. Immunity. 2009;30(5):636–45. pmid:19464986.
- 4. Belkaid Y, Blank RB, Suffia I. Natural regulatory T cells and parasites: a common quest for host homeostasis. Immunol Rev. 2006;212:287–300. pmid:16903921.
- 5. Belkaid Y, Piccirillo CA, Mendez S, Shevach EM, Sacks DL. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells control Leishmania major persistence and immunity. Nature. 2002;420(6915):502–7. pmid:12466842.
- 6. Facciabene A, Motz GT, Coukos G. T-regulatory cells: key players in tumor immune escape and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2012;72(9):2162–71. pmid:22549946; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3342842.
- 7. Johanns TM, Ertelt JM, Rowe JH, Way SS. Regulatory T cell suppressive potency dictates the balance between bacterial proliferation and clearance during persistent Salmonella infection. PLoS pathogens. 2010;6(8):e1001043. pmid:20714351; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2920851.
- 8. Rowe JH, Ertelt JM, Aguilera MN, Farrar MA, Way SS. Foxp3(+) regulatory T cell expansion required for sustaining pregnancy compromises host defense against prenatal bacterial pathogens. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10(1):54–64. pmid:21767812; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3140139.
- 9. Scott-Browne JP, Shafiani S, Tucker-Heard G, Ishida-Tsubota K, Fontenot JD, Rudensky AY, et al. Expansion and function of Foxp3-expressing T regulatory cells during tuberculosis. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2007;204(9):2159–69. pmid:17709423; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2118702.
- 10. Cabrera R, Tu Z, Xu Y, Firpi RJ, Rosen HR, Liu C, et al. An immunomodulatory role for CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T lymphocytes in hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 2004;40(5):1062–71. pmid:15486925.
- 11. Luhn K, Simmons CP, Moran E, Dung NT, Chau TN, Quyen NT, et al. Increased frequencies of CD4+ CD25(high) regulatory T cells in acute dengue infection. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2007;204(5):979–85. pmid:17452519; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2118571.
- 12. Lanteri MC, O'Brien KM, Purtha WE, Cameron MJ, Lund JM, Owen RE, et al. Tregs control the development of symptomatic West Nile virus infection in humans and mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(11):3266–77. pmid:19855131; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2769173.
- 13. Lund JM, Hsing L, Pham TT, Rudensky AY. Coordination of early protective immunity to viral infection by regulatory T cells. Science. 2008;320(5880):1220–4. pmid:18436744; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2519146.
- 14. Moreno-Fernandez ME, Rueda CM, Rusie LK, Chougnet CA. Regulatory T cells control HIV replication in activated T cells through a cAMP-dependent mechanism. Blood. 2011;117(20):5372–80. pmid:21436067; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3109711.
- 15. Hori S, Carvalho TL, Demengeot J. CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells suppress CD4+ T cell-mediated pulmonary hyperinflammation driven by Pneumocystis carinii in immunodeficient mice. European journal of immunology. 2002;32(5):1282–91. pmid:11981815.
- 16. Layland LE, Straubinger K, Ritter M, Loffredo-Verde E, Garn H, Sparwasser T, et al. Schistosoma mansoni-mediated suppression of allergic airway inflammation requires patency and Foxp3+ Treg cells. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(8):e2379. pmid:23967364; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3744427.
- 17. Haque A, Best SE, Amante FH, Mustafah S, Desbarrieres L, de Labastida F, et al. CD4+ natural regulatory T cells prevent experimental cerebral malaria via CTLA-4 when expanded in vivo. PLoS pathogens. 2010;6(12):e1001221. pmid:21170302; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3000360.
- 18. Oldenhove G, Bouladoux N, Wohlfert EA, Hall JA, Chou D, Dos Santos L, et al. Decrease of Foxp3+ Treg cell number and acquisition of effector cell phenotype during lethal infection. Immunity. 2009;31(5):772–86. pmid:19896394; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2814877.
- 19. Pandiyan P, Conti HR, Zheng L, Peterson AC, Mathern DR, Hernandez-Santos N, et al. CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells promote Th17 cells in vitro and enhance host resistance in mouse Candida albicans Th17 cell infection model. Immunity. 2011;34(3):422–34. pmid:21435589; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3258585.
- 20. Lewerenz M, Mogensen KE, Uze G. Shared receptor components but distinct complexes for alpha and beta interferons. Journal of molecular biology. 1998;282(3):585–99. pmid:9737924.
- 21. Ivashkiv LB, Donlin LT. Regulation of type I interferon responses. Nature reviews Immunology. 2014;14(1):36–49. pmid:24362405; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4084561.
- 22. Chow KT, Gale M Jr. SnapShot: Interferon Signaling. Cell. 2015;163(7):1808–e1. pmid:26687364.
- 23. Yan N, Chen ZJ. Intrinsic antiviral immunity. Nature immunology. 2012;13(3):214–22. pmid:22344284; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3549670.
- 24. Al Moussawi K, Ghigo E, Kalinke U, Alexopoulou L, Mege JL, Desnues B. Type I interferon induction is detrimental during infection with the Whipple's disease bacterium, Tropheryma whipplei. PLoS pathogens. 2010;6(1):e1000722. pmid:20090833; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2798751.
- 25. Fink K, Lang KS, Manjarrez-Orduno N, Junt T, Senn BM, Holdener M, et al. Early type I interferon-mediated signals on B cells specifically enhance antiviral humoral responses. European journal of immunology. 2006;36(8):2094–105. pmid:16810635.
- 26. Havenar-Daughton C, Kolumam GA, Murali-Krishna K. Cutting Edge: The direct action of type I IFN on CD4 T cells is critical for sustaining clonal expansion in response to a viral but not a bacterial infection. Journal of immunology. 2006;176(6):3315–9. pmid:16517698.
- 27. Kolumam GA, Thomas S, Thompson LJ, Sprent J, Murali-Krishna K. Type I interferons act directly on CD8 T cells to allow clonal expansion and memory formation in response to viral infection. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2005;202(5):637–50. pmid:16129706; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2212878.
- 28. McNab F, Mayer-Barber K, Sher A, Wack A, O'Garra A. Type I interferons in infectious disease. Nature reviews Immunology. 2015;15(2):87–103. pmid:25614319.
- 29. Nguyen KB, Salazar-Mather TP, Dalod MY, Van Deusen JB, Wei XQ, Liew FY, et al. Coordinated and distinct roles for IFN-alpha beta, IL-12, and IL-15 regulation of NK cell responses to viral infection. Journal of immunology. 2002;169(8):4279–87. pmid:12370359.
- 30. Pace L, Vitale S, Dettori B, Palombi C, La Sorsa V, Belardelli F, et al. APC activation by IFN-alpha decreases regulatory T cell and enhances Th cell functions. Journal of immunology. 2010;184(11):5969–79. pmid:20427775.
- 31. Snell LM, McGaha TL, Brooks DG. Type I Interferon in Chronic Virus Infection and Cancer. Trends Immunol. 2017;38(8):542–57. pmid:28579323.
- 32. Stifter SA, Feng CG. Interfering with immunity: detrimental role of type I IFNs during infection. Journal of immunology. 2015;194(6):2455–65. pmid:25747907.
- 33. Wilson EB, Yamada DH, Elsaesser H, Herskovitz J, Deng J, Cheng G, et al. Blockade of chronic type I interferon signaling to control persistent LCMV infection. Science. 2013;340(6129):202–7. pmid:23580528; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3704950.
- 34. Teijaro JR, Ng C, Lee AM, Sullivan BM, Sheehan KC, Welch M, et al. Persistent LCMV infection is controlled by blockade of type I interferon signaling. Science. 2013;340(6129):207–11. pmid:23580529; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3640797.
- 35. Namdar A, Nikbin B, Ghabaee M, Bayati A, Izad M. Effect of IFN-beta therapy on the frequency and function of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells and Foxp3 gene expression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS): a preliminary study. Journal of neuroimmunology. 2010;218(1–2):120–4. pmid:19932513.
- 36. Riley CH, Jensen MK, Brimnes MK, Hasselbalch HC, Bjerrum OW, Straten PT, et al. Increase in circulating CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T cells in patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms during treatment with IFN-alpha. Blood. 2011;118(8):2170–3. pmid:21708889.
- 37. Metidji A, Rieder SA, Glass DD, Cremer I, Punkosdy GA, Shevach EM. IFN-alpha/beta receptor signaling promotes regulatory T cell development and function under stress conditions. Journal of immunology. 2015;194(9):4265–76. pmid:25795758; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4402260.
- 38. Ou R, Zhou S, Huang L, Moskophidis D. Critical role for alpha/beta and gamma interferons in persistence of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus by clonal exhaustion of cytotoxic T cells. J Virol. 2001;75(18):8407–23. pmid:11507186; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC115086.
- 39. Srivastava S, Koch MA, Pepper M, Campbell DJ. Type I interferons directly inhibit regulatory T cells to allow optimal antiviral T cell responses during acute LCMV infection. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2014;211(5):961–74. pmid:24711580; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4010906.
- 40. Bennett CL, Christie J, Ramsdell F, Brunkow ME, Ferguson PJ, Whitesell L, et al. The immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) is caused by mutations of FOXP3. Nat Genet. 2001;27(1):20–1. pmid:11137993.
- 41. Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nature immunology. 2003;4(4):330–6. pmid:12612578.
- 42. Penaloza-MacMaster P, Kamphorst AO, Wieland A, Araki K, Iyer SS, West EE, et al. Interplay between regulatory T cells and PD-1 in modulating T cell exhaustion and viral control during chronic LCMV infection. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2014;211(9):1905–18. pmid:25113973; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4144726.
- 43. Buggert M, Tauriainen J, Yamamoto T, Frederiksen J, Ivarsson MA, Michaelsson J, et al. T-bet and Eomes are differentially linked to the exhausted phenotype of CD8+ T cells in HIV infection. PLoS pathogens. 2014;10(7):e1004251. pmid:25032686; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4102564.
- 44. Gupta PK, Godec J, Wolski D, Adland E, Yates K, Pauken KE, et al. CD39 Expression Identifies Terminally Exhausted CD8+ T Cells. PLoS pathogens. 2015;11(10):e1005177. pmid:26485519; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4618999.
- 45. Park HJ, Park JS, Jeong YH, Son J, Ban YH, Lee BH, et al. PD-1 upregulated on regulatory T cells during chronic virus infection enhances the suppression of CD8+ T cell immune response via the interaction with PD-L1 expressed on CD8+ T cells. Journal of immunology. 2015;194(12):5801–11. pmid:25934860.
- 46. Wherry EJ, Kurachi M. Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion. Nature reviews Immunology. 2015;15(8):486–99. pmid:26205583; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4889009.
- 47. Laidlaw BJ, Cui W, Amezquita RA, Gray SM, Guan T, Lu Y, et al. Production of IL-10 by CD4(+) regulatory T cells during the resolution of infection promotes the maturation of memory CD8(+) T cells. Nature immunology. 2015;16(8):871–9. pmid:26147684; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4713030.
- 48. Rusinova I, Forster S, Yu S, Kannan A, Masse M, Cumming H, et al. Interferome v2.0: an updated database of annotated interferon-regulated genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D1040–6. pmid:23203888; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3531205.
- 49. Fu W, Ergun A, Lu T, Hill JA, Haxhinasto S, Fassett MS, et al. A multiply redundant genetic switch 'locks in' the transcriptional signature of regulatory T cells. Nature immunology. 2012;13(10):972–80. pmid:22961053; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3698954.
- 50. van der Veeken J, Gonzalez AJ, Cho H, Arvey A, Hemmers S, Leslie CS, et al. Memory of Inflammation in Regulatory T Cells. Cell. 2016;166(4):977–90. pmid:27499023; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4996371.
- 51. Pidoux G, Gerbaud P, Dompierre J, Lygren B, Solstad T, Evain-Brion D, et al. A PKA-ezrin-Cx43 signaling complex controls gap junction communication and thereby trophoblast cell fusion. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 19):4172–85. pmid:25052094.
- 52. Wehbi VL, Tasken K. Molecular Mechanisms for cAMP-Mediated Immunoregulation in T cells—Role of Anchored Protein Kinase A Signaling Units. Front Immunol. 2016;7:222. pmid:27375620; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4896925.
- 53. Ishiguro K, Green T, Rapley J, Wachtel H, Giallourakis C, Landry A, et al. Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is a modulator of CARMA1-mediated NF-kappaB activation. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(14):5497–508. pmid:16809782; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1592706.
- 54. Long M, Park SG, Strickland I, Hayden MS, Ghosh S. Nuclear factor-kappaB modulates regulatory T cell development by directly regulating expression of Foxp3 transcription factor. Immunity. 2009;31(6):921–31. pmid:20064449.
- 55. Konig S, Probst-Kepper M, Reinl T, Jeron A, Huehn J, Schraven B, et al. First insight into the kinome of human regulatory T cells. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40896. pmid:22815858; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3397934.
- 56.
Oaks Z, Winans T, Huang N, Blair S, Beckford M, Banki K, et al., editors. Rab4A Is Required for Development of Tregs, Restricts Antiphospholipid Antibody Production and Pro-Inflammatory Expansion of Macrophages and Neutrophils, and Blocks Pristane-Induced Intra-Alveolar Hemorrhage in a Mouse Model of SLE. Arthritis Rheumatol; 2016 Sep. ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, 2016.
- 57. Ruiz S, Santos E, Bustelo XR. RasGRF2, a guanosine nucleotide exchange factor for Ras GTPases, participates in T-cell signaling responses. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(23):8127–42. pmid:17923690; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2169177.
- 58. Schmitz I, Schneider C, Frohlich A, Frebel H, Christ D, Leonard WJ, et al. IL-21 Restricts Virus-driven Treg Cell Expansion in Chronic LCMV Infection. PLoS pathogens. 2013;9(5):e1003362. pmid:23696736
- 59. Cusick JK, Mustian A, Goldberg K, Reyland ME. RELT induces cellular death in HEK 293 epithelial cells. Cell Immunol. 2010;261(1):1–8. pmid:19969290; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3407663.
- 60. Hackl D, Loschko J, Sparwasser T, Reindl W, Krug AB. Activation of dendritic cells via TLR7 reduces Foxp3 expression and suppressive function in induced Tregs. European journal of immunology. 2011;41(5):1334–43. pmid:21469103.
- 61. Lee J, Jung MK, Park HJ, Kim KE, Cho D. Erdr1 Suppresses Murine Melanoma Growth via Regulation of Apoptosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(1). pmid:26784177; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4730348.
- 62. Di Franco S, Turdo A, Todaro M, Stassi G. Role of Type I and II Interferons in Colorectal Cancer and Melanoma. Front Immunol. 2017;8:878. pmid:28798748; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5526853.
- 63. Stewart CA, Metheny H, Iida N, Smith L, Hanson M, Steinhagen F, et al. Interferon-dependent IL-10 production by Tregs limits tumor Th17 inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(11):4859–74. pmid:24216477; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3809773.
- 64. Benson A, Murray S, Divakar P, Burnaevskiy N, Pifer R, Forman J, et al. Microbial infection-induced expansion of effector T cells overcomes the suppressive effects of regulatory T cells via an IL-2 deprivation mechanism. Journal of immunology. 2012;188(2):800–10. pmid:22147768; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3253229.
- 65. Korn T, Reddy J, Gao W, Bettelli E, Awasthi A, Petersen TR, et al. Myelin-specific regulatory T cells accumulate in the CNS but fail to control autoimmune inflammation. Nat Med. 2007;13(4):423–31. pmid:17384649; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3427780.
- 66. Clough LE, Wang CJ, Schmidt EM, Booth G, Hou TZ, Ryan GA, et al. Release from regulatory T cell-mediated suppression during the onset of tissue-specific autoimmunity is associated with elevated IL-21. Journal of immunology. 2008;180(8):5393–401. pmid:18390721.
- 67. Wehrens EJ, Vastert SJ, Mijnheer G, Meerding J, Klein M, Wulffraat NM, et al. Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha targets protein kinase B/c-Akt-induced resistance of effector cells to suppression in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(12):3279–84. pmid:23983021.
- 68. Trinschek B, Luessi F, Haas J, Wildemann B, Zipp F, Wiendl H, et al. Kinetics of IL-6 production defines T effector cell responsiveness to regulatory T cells in multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77634. pmid:24155968; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3796502.
- 69. van Amelsfort JM, van Roon JA, Noordegraaf M, Jacobs KM, Bijlsma JW, Lafeber FP, et al. Proinflammatory mediator-induced reversal of CD4+,CD25+ regulatory T cell-mediated suppression in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(3):732–42. pmid:17328044.
- 70. O'Sullivan BJ, Thomas HE, Pai S, Santamaria P, Iwakura Y, Steptoe RJ, et al. IL-1 beta breaks tolerance through expansion of CD25+ effector T cells. Journal of immunology. 2006;176(12):7278–87. pmid:16751371.
- 71. Pace L, Rizzo S, Palombi C, Brombacher F, Doria G. Cutting edge: IL-4-induced protection of CD4+CD25- Th cells from CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell-mediated suppression. Journal of immunology. 2006;176(7):3900–4. pmid:16547222.
- 72. Mercadante ER, Lorenz UM. Breaking Free of Control: How Conventional T Cells Overcome Regulatory T Cell Suppression. Front Immunol. 2016;7:193. pmid:27242798; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4870238.
- 73. Stephens GL, McHugh RS, Whitters MJ, Young DA, Luxenberg D, Carreno BM, et al. Engagement of glucocorticoid-induced TNFR family-related receptor on effector T cells by its ligand mediates resistance to suppression by CD4+CD25+ T cells. Journal of immunology. 2004;173(8):5008–20. pmid:15470044.
- 74. Choi BK, Bae JS, Choi EM, Kang WJ, Sakaguchi S, Vinay DS, et al. 4-1BB-dependent inhibition of immunosuppression by activated CD4+CD25+ T cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;75(5):785–91. pmid:14694186.
- 75. Ishii N, Takahashi T, Soroosh P, Sugamura K. OX40-OX40 ligand interaction in T-cell-mediated immunity and immunopathology. Adv Immunol. 2010;105:63–98. pmid:20510730.
- 76. Chen X, Hamano R, Subleski JJ, Hurwitz AA, Howard OM, Oppenheim JJ. Expression of costimulatory TNFR2 induces resistance of CD4+FoxP3- conventional T cells to suppression by CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells. Journal of immunology. 2010;185(1):174–82. pmid:20525892.
- 77. Nie H, Zheng Y, Li R, Guo TB, He D, Fang L, et al. Phosphorylation of FOXP3 controls regulatory T cell function and is inhibited by TNF-alpha in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Med. 2013;19(3):322–8. pmid:23396208.
- 78. Ahmed R, Salmi A, Butler LD, Chiller JM, Oldstone MB. Selection of genetic variants of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus in spleens of persistently infected mice. Role in suppression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte response and viral persistence. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1984;160(2):521–40. pmid:6332167; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2187458.
- 79. Sebastian M, Lopez-Ocasio M, Metidji A, Rieder SA, Shevach EM, Thornton AM. Helios Controls a Limited Subset of Regulatory T Cell Functions. Journal of immunology. 2016;196(1):144–55. pmid:26582951; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4685018.
- 80. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60. pmid:25751142; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4655817.
- 81. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–9. pmid:25260700; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4287950.
- 82. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. pmid:25516281; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4302049.
- 83. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15545–50. pmid:16199517; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1239896.