Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Vegan versus meat-based dog food: Guardian-reported indicators of health

  • Andrew Knight,
  • Eason Huang,
  • Nicholas Rai,
  • Hazel Brown
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

The Competing Interests statement is incorrect. Information about the study’s sponsor is already provided in the Funding statement but is not included in the Competing Interests statement. The correct Competing Interests statement is as follows: This research and its publication open access was funded by food awareness organisation ProVeg International (https://proveg.com). AK received this award ID: Oct2019-0000000286. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

[1]In addition, the Data Availability statement is incorrect. The correct Data Availability statement is as follows: The data analysed are accessible at https://osf.io/nbepu. [2].

References

  1. 1. Knight A, Huang E, Rai N, Brown H (2022) Vegan versus meat-based dog food: Guardian-reported indicators of health. PLoS ONE 17(4): e0265662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265662 pmid:35417464
  2. 2. Knight A. (2023). Vegan versus meat-based pet foods: a study of 1418 cats and 2639 dogs. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NBEPU.

Citation: Knight A, Huang E, Rai N, Brown H (2023) Correction: Vegan versus meat-based dog food: Guardian-reported indicators of health. PLoS ONE 18(8): e0291214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291214

Published: August 31, 2023

Copyright: © 2023 Knight et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.