https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8015-7010
Figures
Abstract
The provision of resilience and adaptation to climate change to smallholder irrigation communities is a critical component in implementing common pool resource management. Institutions in many smallholder irrigation schemes in developing countries are diverse and have potential to contribute to building climate resilience and improving livelihoods of smallholder irrigator. Human behaviour, institutional capacity and culture play important roles in shaping adaptive capacity of communities to climate change. Although much is known about how these contribute to this adaptive capacity, research focusing on their interaction is limited. In order to close this the gap, this study seeks to explore how socio-demographic, governance and institutional factors influence adaptive capacity in Exchange, Insukamini and Ruchanyu irrigation schemes. Questionnaire-based interviews, group discussions and key informant interviews were used for data collection. Adaptive capacity calculated using the livelihood vulnerability model was used as the dependent variable for this study. Ordinary least square regression was used to assess socio-demographic, institutional and governance factors influencing adaptive capacity in the smallholder irrigation scheme. The study reveals that adaptive capacity is influenced by age, gender, education, land tenure security, irrigation committee satisfaction, cooperatives, and interaction of factors. The link between age and gender were negatively moderated by awareness of irrigation policies, access to credit and land tenure security. Assessing factors influencing adaptive capacity help to improve the livelihoods of scheme farmers in the face of climate change.
Citation: Mwadzingeni L, Mugandani R, Mafongoya PL (2022) Socio-demographic, institutional and governance factors influencing adaptive capacity of smallholder irrigators in Zimbabwe. PLoS ONE 17(8): e0273648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273648
Editor: Sergio Villamayor-Tomas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, SPAIN
Received: August 24, 2021; Accepted: August 14, 2022; Published: August 29, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Mwadzingeni et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Data files are available on https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6587529.
Funding: This research was funded by South Africa’s National Research Foundation (NRF) grant number (86893).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1. Introduction
Adaptive capacity is crucial to ensure that systems, institutions, humans, and organisms can innovate and adapt more quickly to climate change and variability [1]. Building adaptive capacity has become more imperative in global policies documents such as Agenda 2030 [2], the Paris Agreement [3] and, growing interdisciplinary research. Further, following the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment Report (TAR) [4], there has been a rapid growth of studies on adaptive capacity, methodologies and, matrices (indices, proxies and scores) [1]. Adaptive capacity is defined by IPCC assessment report AR5 [5] as, “the ability of the systems, institutions, human, and other organisations to adjust to potential damage, to take advantage of opportunities, or to respond to consequences.” Assessment of adaptive capacity has grown exponentially across scales [6] sectors and geographies since its recognition as a critical component of vulnerability and resilience [1, 7]. Adaptive capacity studies are dominant in developed nations but limited in developing nations [1].
Smallholder irrigation schemes (SISs) are promoted to increase the adaptive capacity of communities in marginal environments. These SISs are common-pool resources (CPRs) and their success is dependent on the robustness of self-governing institutions and their capacity to sustainably manage the productive resource as conditions changes [8, 9]. The strength of the institutions governing socio-ecological systems like irrigation schemes is important to most smallholder farmers’ livelihoods and food security [10]. Yet, socio-ecological systems have numerous complex variables that interact and affect how they operate at multiple levels [11, 12].
Previous studies have shown that the institutions in the SISs should be effective in collective decision-making, allocation of limited water resources, infrastructure maintenance, and conflict resolution [9, 13]. Institutions thrive on building and sustaining cooperation in CPR system through satisfying both short-term self-interests and long-term group goals [14] in an evolving ecological, socio-economic and political environment shaping its emergence, evolving and operation [13]. SISs are run by Irrigation Management Committees (IMCs), which are mainly governed by customary laws and water use rights that authorise scheme farmers to collectively manage water use [9]. Nevertheless, environmental change and increased water scarcity have added an extra burden on these functional socio-ecological systems that have shown mixed performances [8]. The relationship between CPR management and adaptation calls for integrating climate and socio-ecological system management policies [9, 15] in SISs. Institutions can constrain or enable adaptation [16]; hence institutional analysis is essential in adapting socio-ecological systems to climatic change.
As an integral part of smallholder irrigation schemes, governance is vital for addressing climate change-related challenges in these socio-ecological systems. According to institutional theory, governance involves decision-making and resource utilization to alter the conditions of the society [17]. Several studies have shown that governance shapes adaptive capacity [18–23]. Governance is essential for climate change adaptation in smallholder agriculture [24, 25] and smallholder irrigation farming [26]. Recent studies show that improvement of system governance enhanced climate change adaptation [27–30].
Socio-demographic factors are essential for climate change adaptation in smallholder irrigation schemes [31]. A recent study in Nepal shows that socio-demographic factors are among the factors which influence adaptive capacity [31]. According to Alemayehu and Bewket [32], socio-demographic factors affect farmers’ choice of coping and adaptation strategies to climate change. Socio-demographic characteristics, including household size, education, age, and gender, are basic farmer characteristics that influence their potential to adapt [31].
This study was inspired by Ostrom [12] through her institutional analysis framework developed to understand and overcome uncertainties and complex social dilemmas. Reflections across different CPR systems show the success and failure of Ostrom principles [13, 33]. This is not surprising given the myriad and complex relationship between institutions and adaptation in SISs. Globally, the findings from publications on the roles of institutions on adaptation in SISs have produced contrasting results under different settings [13]. This shows that previous successful institutional actions may not be effective in a different context, creating a knowledge gap on patterns and dynamics of institutional changes in diverse socio-ecological and political contexts [13]. Therefore, given the heterogeneity of the farming systems worldwide, especially in southern Africa, more evidence-based studies are required to explore the role of institutions in adaptation in SISs. This scientific inquiry is critical given that in the absence of unambiguous local knowledge, the role of institutions in adaptation in SISs would largely remain a challenge. The CPR nature of SISs highlights the need to understand the relation between institutions and adaptation to climate change. SISs in southern Africa and especially in Zimbabwe may differ from similar CPR worldwide based on their biophysical, cultural and political context, challenging understanding of the performance of their institutions on adaptation based on existing studies.
In Zimbabwe, Vision 2030 foretells a completely different economy for the country. In agriculture, a low-hanging fruit sector for Vision 2030, a sensible problem is climate-proofing crop yields in smallholder farming systems given their vulnerability to climate change. By developing the targeted 350 000 ha for irrigation during the Zimbabwe National Development Strategy 1 (2020–2025), the country aims to increase agricultural output, particularly in smallholder farmers. IMCs running SISs are key to climate-proofing crop yields. Thus, policy strategies are required to strengthen institutions for reducing sensitivity while building resilience to climate change.
Based on the literature on the role of institutions on adaptation in the smallholder irrigation systems [8, 15, 34–38], we make the following conjectures: Institution influence the adaptive capacity of smallholder irrigation systems; Institutional elements such as scheme rules, governmental and private organization support, water sharing and scheme maintenance, IMCs and participation of scheme member influence adaptive capacity.
Zimbabwean context is suitable for studying the relationship between institutions and adaptation in SISs due to multiple reasons. First; Irrigation schemes in the country have a linear relationship with higher food security and income that is compromised by drought-related challenges and limited investment in infrastructure maintenance [39]. Secondly, a majority of the SISs have collapsed [40], while some are performing poorly [39]. Thirdly, Zimbabwe lies in southern Africa, where poor farmer participation, lack of access to markets, weak institutions, limited political will, poor scheme design, and technical factors are highlighted as some of the critical factors undermining the performance of SISs [39, 41, 42]. Fourth, the government of Zimbabwe and its partners in irrigation development, including the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and the Smallholder Irrigation Revitalization Programme (SIRP), continue to invest in new SISs and rehabilitate existing ones. Lastly, through the recently availed Irrigation Policy, the Government of Zimbabwe intends to improve water use efficiency, improve access to finance, inputs, markets, overcome governance challenges, and improve policy and regulation environment in irrigation schemes. Thus, strong institutions in SISs are required to achieve these objectives.
Our study focuses on two social factors that are of paramount importance in climate change adaptation: age and gender. Vulnerability to climate change differs widely at the household level up to the national, reflecting the probable influence of age and gender, among other factors, through multiple pathways [43].
Despite contributing about 80% of the total food produced in Africa, women face an assortment of challenges [44]. The high prevalence of gender inequalities among developing nations, particularly in Africa, is a cause of concern considering the threats posed by climate change and limited adaptive capacities, particularly in women [45]. Gender shapes the outcome of climate change for smallholder and subsistence farmers [46]. Poor women and female-headed households are disproportionately on the receiving end of increased environmental degradation and have fewer resources to cope with and adapt to climate change [45, 46]. For instance, rural areas have increased walking distances to fetch water and firewood. Adaptation to climate change is not gender neutral due to the tendency of existing wide gender inequalities [47]. Gender plays a crucial role in climate change response since women are affected differently and their lack of power to influence decision-making than men. Thus, understanding the interaction of gender and institutional factors requires special attention when mainstreaming gender in adaptive capacity actions.
Age determines vulnerability to climate change and other environmental shocks, as the impacts of climate change are differentiated along the age lines. Further, the impacts of climate change are age-differentiated and reflect personal experiences. Climate action will not succeed without the participation and engagement of old, as 10% of the world population is currently over the age of 60 years, while 20% will be over the age of 60 by 2050. The old farmers have lived experiences in the past and present climatic conditions, positively influencing their adaptation to climate change [48]. The experience of old farmers make them risk averse compared to young farmers [48]. However, age positively impacts climate change adaptation, as aged farmers are more enlightened about climate change and various livelihood options to adapt. While literature is awash with the role of socio-demographic, governance, and institutional factors on adaptive capacity, there is less insights on theorization on interaction among variables. Meanwhile, there is need for research on adaptive capacity to shift focus from the relationship between two variables towards establishing how some putative causal variables influence the outcome through answering “how” and “when” questions [49]. This helps to deepen our understanding of the phenomenon through uncovering and describing the contingencies of mechanisms [49]. Conditional process analysis was widely used in empirical literature across many disciplines: psychology [50–52]; public health [53]; sociology [54]; management [55]; biology [56]; and communication [57]. However, its use in climate change vulnerability and adaptation is at an infancy stage. Therefore, this study seeks to quantify and test the hypothesis by which socio-economic, governance and institutional transmit their effects on adaptive capacity based on ex-ante expectations in smallholder irrigation schemes in Zimbabwe.
2. Methodology
2.1 Study area
This study was conducted in Midlands Province of Zimbabwe. It progressed from the identification of three research sites (Exchange, Insukamini and Ruchanyu Irrigation schemes). The selection of the study sites was based on the diversity of their characteristics, as shown in Table 1.
2.2 Data collection
Questionnaire surveys were undertaken to collect data in Exchange, Insukamini and Ruchanyu irrigation schemes. A pilot study was done to test the suitability of the questionnaire for this study. Questionnaire interviews were used to collect socio-economic, institutional and governance data from the head, middle and tail sections of the schemes.
This study used stratified random sampling to identify respondents based on statistical representativeness of the sample. Random sampling is a probabilistic sampling method brought to the fore by Bowley [63]. A statistically significant sample of 317 households (192 from Exchange irrigation scheme, 88 from Insukamini irrigation scheme and 37 from Ruchanyu irrigation scheme) was selected for the study (P ≤ 5%) as shown in Table 2. The formula below was used to determine the sample size of this study:
(1)
Where n–sample size, N–population and e–confidence interval
2.3 Ethical statement
As guided and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of KwaZulu-Natal (HSSREC/00003196/2021), ethical requirements were followed. Participants signed a consent form, were informed that they could stop the interviews at any time, that there were no consequences for non-participation and that data would be treated confidentially.
2.4 Data analysis
Firstly, adaptive capacity was computed from raw data set using weighted-balance and integrated approach. Weighted balance and integrated approach adapted after Hahn et al [64] was used to calculate adaptive capacity. Major components of adaptive capacity (socio-demographic factors, livelihood strategies and social networks) consist of subcomponents, each contributing equally to the index and given equal weighting. The weighted balance and integrated approach is mainly used in calculating Livelihood Vulnerability Index (LVI) and Climate Vulnerability Index [65]. The use of weighted balance and integrated approach is recently increasing due to the rising need to analyse vulnerability to climate-related disasters [65].
Factors such as awareness of irrigation policies, access to credit, and satisfaction with tenure security were used to condition the link between gender and age of the household head with adaptive capacity. Meanwhile, the link between independent factors, interactions and adaptive capacity was estimated by linear regression analysis at the same time. Hayes [49] postulate that analysis of interactions can be done using various models, hence, for this study we used linear regression model. Ordinary least-square (OLS), one of the familiar statistical techniques in the social sciences used to predict the values of continuous response variables in multivariate analysis [66], was applied. Variance inflation factor (VIF) less than 2.96 less than a cut-off point of 10 [67], shows absence of potential multicollinearity. The Breusch-Pagan/Cook-Weisberg test show absence of heteroskedasticity (Chi2(14) = 11.02; p = 0.808). OLS satisfies the need of this study due to its ability to provide the best estimates with continuous and coded categorical variables [66]. Recently, OLS was used to assess the effects of climate change adaptation on livelihood vulnerability in Ghana [68]. Linearity of regression coefficients, absence of serial correlation, predictors are uncorrelated with coefficients, absence of multicollinearity and normality of residuals are the limitations met to have the best OLS estimates from this study.
Eq (2) was used to standardize specific components.
(2)
Where Sv−original subcomponent value; Smin and Smux−minimum and maximum value of the subcomponent, respectively.
An average of each subcomponent was calculated using Eq (3)
(3)
Where Mvj−value of major component j for area v; Indexsvi−subcomponent value indexed by i of major component Mj; n–number of subcomponents in major component Mj.
(4)
Where IndexAdaCap–adaptation capacity index; WSDF, WLS, WSN−weight for socio-demographic factors (SDF, livelihood strategies (LS and social network (SN), respectively.
An OLS regression analysis was performed on vulnerability indices of Adaptive Capacity to assess governance and institutional factors influencing the adaptive capacity of scheme communities. OLS regression was performed with Adaptive Capacity as a dependent variable, while socio-demographic factors, governance and institutional variables.
(5)
Where Yi−the dependent variable; X1, X2,…,Xm−the independent variables; a–constant; b1, b2,…,bm−multiple regression coefficients.
3. Results
3.1 Socio-demographic characteristics
Table 3 below shows socio-demographic characteristics of households in Exchange, Insukamini and Ruchanyu Irrigation Scheme. Based on this study, Ruchanyu Irrigation Scheme has the most male respondents and Insukamini have the least (P ≤ 0.01). Among the three schemes, most of the respondents in Ruchanyu were significantly married than respondents in Ruchanyu and Exchange, given that over nine-tenth of the respondents were married (P ≤ 0.01). Although more scheme farmers where married, the majority of the female household heads (53.8%) were not married, as shown in Table 3. It was observed that Exchange is dominated by aging farmers (average age of 56 years) compared to Ruchanyu and Insukamini Irrigation schemes. Data from the questionnaire survey revealed that respondents from Insukamini Irrigation scheme acquired the highest level of formal education (10 years).
In comparison, those in Exchange irrigation scheme attain the least educational level (8.5 years). In respect of household size, respondents in Ruchanyu Irrigation Scheme have the largest household size (average of 7.42 members) while the respondents in Exchange Irrigation Scheme had the least (average of 4.52) as shown in Table 3. Respondents in Exchange Irrigation Scheme are more experienced farmers (average years in the farming of 31.24 years), while those in Ruchanyu had the least experience in farming (average years of farming of 20.15 years). Respondents in Exchange Irrigation Scheme are more experienced in irrigation farming (average of 23.59 years), while those in Ruchanyu Irrigation Scheme are last experienced (average of 9.36 years) (Table 3).
3.2 Governance and institutional factors
Across the three irrigation schemes in this study, there is a significant difference in satisfaction of participation of local institutional actors in the schemes (P ≤ 0.01) as shown in Table 4.
For the three schemes in this study, there is a significant difference in the participation of scheme farmers in irrigation water scheduling and electing/removing members (P ≤ 0.01) (Table 5).
3.3 Factors affecting adaptive capacity
A zero-order correlation was applied to determine the magnitude of the correlation of socio-demographic, institutional and governance factors with adaptive capacity. Table 6 shows the descriptive statistics and correlation among variables, including factors that significantly and positively or negatively correlate with Adaptive capacity.
The age of the household head is a proxy of farming experience which positively influences adaptation to climate change [48]. Older adults have understanding, skills and philosophies developed by societies over interaction with natural surroundings and indigenous knowledge, which help them cope, adapt and impress diverse livelihood options to changing climate [43]. Older people have past and present environmental knowledge helping them to detect, understand and predict environmental change [43]. Agrarian communities in the Global South are marked with gendered inequalities where males have dominant abilities to hold and manage land, access credit and access to development programs distinctively designed for men [69]. Education reflects the capacity to generate, absorb and process new information, assess response options and frame or reframe problems [43]. Education enables effective adaptation to climate change by preparing people for complex adaptive decision-making [70]. Land tenure security strongly incentivizes farmers to invest in climate change adaptation [71]. Traditional leaders in Zimbabwe have been useful in the governance of people in rural communities and can play a supportive role in climate change adaptation by enforcing traditional strategies for combating the negative effects of climate change [72]. Local farmers’ cooperatives, academic institutions, the private sector and non-governmental organizations provide an opportunity to implement climate-smart agricultural technologies, which sustainably increase yields under climate change [73]. Irrigation committees provide ways to enhance water-use efficiency and address water paucity across schemes [73]. Enabling policies and institutional mechanisms facilitate the scaling up of adaptation throughout the agri-food systems [73]. Access credit promotes investment in agriculture for climate change adaptation [74].
A moderated regression on adaptive capacity was performed to test for the hypothetical moderation effect of socio-demographic and institutional factors. HH_Gender, Polic, HH_Age, Credit, HH_Edu, Schedule, and Tenure were mean-centered to moderate them and link their interplay with adaptive capacity. According to Aiken, West [67], mean-centering reduces multicollinearity and simplifies results interpretation. The interplay was calculated by multiplying socio-demographic factors and institutional factors. The moderation results of socio-demographic and institutional factors are shown in Table 7. Regression equation for adaptive capacity was found to be significant (F = 14.13; p < 0.001). The results in Table 7 show that socio-economic, governance, institutional factors, and their interplays significantly influence scheme farmers’ adaptive capacity. Adaptive capacity was significantly and positively related to HH_Age (p < 0.01), HH_Gender (p < 0.01), HH_Edu (p < 0.01), Tenur (p < 0.01), and Coop (p < 0.01). Irri_comm (p < 0.01), HHGender*Polic (p < 0.05), HH_Age*Credit (p < 0.05), and HH_Age*Tenure (p < 0.01) were significantly and negatively influencing adaptive capacity.
In addition, two regression lines were drawn between age of household head and adaptive capacity was drawn according to access and no access to credit (Fig 1). Similarly, two regression lines were constructed between satisfaction and no satisfaction with land tenure security (Fig 2). The effect of access to credit on the contribution of age to adaptive capacity can be seen by the differences in gradients of the two lines Fig 1. The regression lines in Fig 2 show the moderation of land tenure security on the effect of the age of household head on adaptive capacity. Fig 3 shows the moderation effects of land tenure security on the relationship between gender and adaptive capacity.
4. Discussion
Our ex-ante expectations were that elderly farmers are more adaptive to climate change due to high farming experience (Table 8), making them good observers of environmental change and knowledgeable in adaptation actions to take [32]. As households head gets older, they become more adaptive to climate change. This study indicated that the relationship between age and adaptive to climate change was positive and weak (p < 0.01). Findings from this study support reports by previous studies that age positively relate to adaptive capacity [32, 75]. The results of this study were contrary to findings by Mwalukasa, Mlozi [76], who reported a negative impact of age on adaptive capacity. Further, Mwalukasa, Mlozi [76] suggest that although experience is higher for older farmers, age retards innovative adaptation due to the growing need for technological usage.
Similarly, the positive coefficient of gender means that males are more adaptive and female farmers have a limited probability of obtaining higher adaptive capacity (Table 6). Climate change is gendered in nature; hence, most of the responsibilities of women are climate-sensitive, making them suffer more because of climate variability than men [77]. Female farmer’s lower adaptive capacity is attributed to limited access to production inputs [68]. Women characteristically have limited access to productive resources (assets, inputs and services) compared to men [78–80], militating their adaptation to climate change and variability. Mosello, Oates [81] find out that female-headed households in Zimbabwe are particularly vulnerable since they hold less land, produce lower yields, own fewer heads of livestock and are excluded from access to services like extension and credit. Results obtained from the study further revealed that 53.8% of the female household heads were not married, while a majority of male household heads were married (89.5%). Women’s marital status is a factor in determining their access to adaptive strategies compared to the case of men [82]. Findings by Van Aelst and Holvoet [82] show that divorced and widowed women are disadvantaged in agricultural water management although they can pursue more income-earning activities outside the farming sector. A study in Mozambique suggests that female-headed households have a lower adaptive capacity [83].
The positive coefficient of education implies that education is key for reducing uncertainties and ensure sustainable agricultural practices, hence increasing the adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers in SISs. Education is one of the generic capacities usually associated with development policies [9]. Findings by Mosello and Oates [81] that low educational levels and lack of skills and weak leadership undermine farmers’ ability to manage their schemes effectively. More educated and experienced farmers have improved access to infrastructure and market, greater capacity to manage and analyse information and use it more efficiently [84, 85]. Educated farmers have a higher opportunity to improve their production, access information, and understand commercial farming concepts that are critical in adapting to climate change [86, 87]. Education may potentially positively influence the ability of the household to take advantage of risk management mechanisms, hence, improving the household’s overall adaptive capacity. These results are consistent with others who suggest that education improves adaptive capacity of households [84, 85, 88, 89]. A study by Asante and Boakye [90] revealed that education positively impacts households with low adaptive capacity.
In terms of land tenure, the results show that farmers satisfied with the land tenure security in the scheme were more likely to adapt to climate change (p < 0.05). The results from this study support the hypothesis that land tenure positively relates to adaptive capacity (Table 8). Farmers in the three schemes did not hold any title deeds to the irrigation land; hence the scheme management is responsible for allocating and transferring the scheme from one user to another. These results concur with Alemayehu and Bewket [32] finding that land tenure security affects the choice of adaptation strategies. Perceived land tenure security impacts land management activities, positively affecting adaptation options due to a higher propensity to engage in multiple adaptation options [32].
The positive relationship between adaptive capacity and satisfaction with cooperatives in the scheme illustrates the importance of collective action on adaptation. These findings imply that farmers’ access to support services that include credit, training and information from cooperatives is more likely to make them more adaptive to climate change. Farmers satisfied with cooperatives can potentially be members of cooperatives. Participating in cooperatives is potentially instrumental in shaping farmers’ motivation and facilitate the decision to adapt to climate change through cooperatives [91]. Cooperative plays a pivotal role by enabling technological adaptation by promoting certain technologies in Zimbabwe [92]. Cooperatives promote effective exchange and co-production of local and scientific information and provide new arenas for social interaction [91]. Members of cooperatives potentially use the best practices approach as they are likely to receive climate change training and better access to financial assistance [93]. The ability of individual actors to retain bonding enables members to gain the benefits of cooperatives.
The IMCs in SISs is responsible for conflict resolution, acquiring and managing funds, and maintaining and improving scheme infrastructure. The results from the study show that participants who were satisfied with the IMCs were less adaptive to climate change. A unit change in satisfaction result in reduced adaptive capacity by a margin of 0.25 at a 1% significant level (Table 6). The study shows that 86.2% of the participants were satisfied with the irrigation management committee. The study’s findings support observations in the Makwe irrigation scheme in Zimbabwe, where 85% of the farmers were satisfied with the irrigation management committee [94]. The negative relationship between satisfaction with IMCs and adaptive capacity implies that IMCs do not consider adaptation to climate change in their activities in water-related issues. The IMCs mobilizes government support, donor funding, financial management, mobilizes participation of members in scheme maintenance, ensures equitable distribution of water and information sharing, and facilitates the development of collective adaptation that is context-specific to the risk the scheme faces. Villamayor-Tomas and García-López [9] postulate that IMCs can provide area-specific adaptive to cope with water-related climate disturbances.
The critical findings show that awareness to irrigation policies significantly and negatively moderates the relationship between gender and adaptation to climate change. Farmers’ knowledge of irrigation policies can negatively impact the contribution of age to adaptive capacity. Although awareness of irrigation policies has no significant direct effect on adaptive capacity, its impact on adaptive capacity is moderating by gender. Previous studies show gender inequality in agricultural policies formulation and awareness, where females are distinctively more compromised [95, 96]. Policies are critical measures for adaptation purposes at local, national and international levels [97]. Hence limited attention of Zimbabwe’s agricultural policies to the impacts of climate change [97, 98] is of significant concern. Negative moderation of age effect on adaptation to climate change might relate to lack of favourable agricultural policies to climate change adaptation [97]. To get rid of the negative moderation of irrigation policies on adaptive capacity, the government of Zimbabwe needs to adopt favourable irrigation policies at the local and national levels.
The study finds out that the positive impact between the age of the household head and adaptation to climate change was significantly and negatively moderated by perception about land tenure security. Thus, perception of land tenure security can negatively impact the contribution of experience farmers attain as they grow older to adapt to climate change. Land tenure security and age of the household head were significantly and positively related to adaptive capacity; however, the negative mediation effect reflects the inverse relationship between the two factors. Hence, aging farmers were land tenure insecure than young farmers. Several studies reported diverse perceptions on land tenure security among smallholder irrigation schemes in Zimbabwe [99]. According to Makanyisa, Chemhuru [100], land tenure security is affected by socio-economic, political and sphere in Zimbabwe. The complex land tenure system among smallholder irrigation schemes across the nation implicates land tenure security [101], challenging adaptation to climate change with the advancement of age.
On the other hand, access to credit negatively moderated the positive relationship between age and adaptive capacity. Farmers’ access to credit can negatively impact the positive relationship between the age of household head and adaptive capacity. In Zimbabwe, access to credit influences farmers’ irrigation development participation [102]. Challenges of accessing credit in smallholder irrigation schemes were highlighted [86, 87, 103]. Farmers in smallholder irrigation schemes of Zimbabwe face challenges in receiving credit through formal financial institutions mainly due to lack of collateral security and lack of formal land tenure [86]. Credit and financial facilities are reported as key components of revitalizing irrigation schemes in Zimbabwe.
This study shows that the age of the household head has a unique relationship with access to credit, which concurs with the previous findings [86, 104, 105]. The regression lines in Fig 1 show that access to credit has a strong regression effect than lack of access to credit. The results show that age is particularly important for farmers to access credit. These results suggest that the effect of access to credit is more prominent for aging farmers. The interaction of access to credit and age of scheme farmers seems to have a far-fetched impact on adaptation to climate change. This suggests that access to credit plays a crucial role in aging farmers’ decisions on implementing adaptation strategies.
Further, the study shows the interaction between age and land tenure security as reported by previous studies [106–108]. Fig 2 shows a similar regression effect of land tenure security of the two regression lines. However, the freehold nature of land tenure in smallholder irrigation schemes in Zimbabwe makes aging farmers unable to access credit due to freehold land tenure unable to invest for climate change adaptation [109, 110]. The results from the study show that land tenure security negatively moderates the relationship between age and adaptive capacity. The findings from this study contradict the report by Zikhali [110]. Farmers attain perceived land tenure security every consecutive year that they occupy the parcel of land, which increases by the farmer’s age. Land tenure security increases with the consecutive increase in the age of the farmers.
On the other hand, land tenure security is closely linked to the gender of the household head. The relationship between land tenure security and gender of household heads in Zimbabwe’s agriculture context was highly emphasized [111–114]. Land tenure security is gendered, and women are mostly disadvantaged [113]. Fig 3 shows that the availability of land tenure security has stronger regression effects than the absence of land tenure security. The findings from this study reveal that land tenure security negatively affects females compared to their male counterparts. The moderation of gender by land tenure negatively impacts adaptation to climate change. Land tenure security helps farmers to have confidence in investing towards climate change adaptation [106]. However, the gender of the household head determines the esteemed land tenure security, such that when land tenure security is absent, gender can negatively impact adaptation to climate change.
Although adaptation to climate change is widely studied, there is limited research on the interaction of factors on adaptation. This study relates to the previous studies on adaptation but has overlapped on innovation. This study relates to previous studies that reported the effects of age, land tenure, gender, and access to credit on adaptation to climate change. The study confirms the relationship between the above factors and adaptive capacity in the smallholder farming sector. Further, based on vulnerability theory, such factors are key determinants of adaptation to climate change.
4.1 Implications
The current study raises essential implications on applying interactions to assess adaptation to climate change. Therefore, understanding the institutional, governance and socio-demographic interaction is crucial to improve adaptation in smallholder irrigation farming. Besides, this study shows that the link between age and adaptive capacity is moderated by two factors (access to credit and land tenure security. Specifically, access to credit and availability of land tenure security negatively impacts the link between age and adaptive capacity. This study strongly recommends understanding the conditions of land tenure security and access to credit that contribute to the negative impact of their interaction with age on adaptation to climate change. Further, land tenure security is of particular importance given that it has negatively moderated the link between age and gender and adaptive capacity. To improve farmers’ participation towards adaptation to climate change in scheme, there is a need to address the factors contributing to the negative impact of land tenure, access to credit, and awareness to policies to link age and gender with adaptive capacity. Climate change adaptation policies need to consider the interaction of factors.
4.2 Limitations
This study has some limitations. First, the dependent variable used an index calculated based on the weighted balance approach of which the factors may or may not carry the same weight. Second, this study was a questionnaire-based study among smallholder irrigation schemes which may make it difficult to convey feelings and emotions and may also have unconscientious responses. Thirdly, this study was conducted on a limited population in three schemes.
5. Conclusion
This study illustrates how socio-demographic, institutional and governance factors and their interactions influence the adaptive capacity of smallholder irrigation farmers in Zimbabwe. Notably, this study identifies that access to credit and land tenure security negatively and significantly modify the link between the age of the household head with adaptation capacity. Similarly, awareness of irrigation policies negatively and significantly modified the interaction between the gender of the household head with adaptive capacity. The findings from this study will contribute to the body of knowledge on adaptation to climate change and the impacts of the interaction of factors on the adaptive capacity of smallholder irrigation communities. Future studies on the interaction of factors are recommended at temporal and spatial scales to widen understanding of its contribution towards climate change adaptation among smallholder farming systems. Since higher adaptive capacity decreases livelihood vulnerability to climate change, understanding the interplay of factors and addressing it will help scheme farmers cope with anticipated extreme climate change and vulnerability cases. This study expands the knowledge of adaptation to climate change by discussing the interplay of factors.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the facilitation done by the Provincial AGRITEX, Gweru, Kwekwe and Shurugwi District offices. In addition, the department of Irrigation (DIRR) in Midlands province, extension workers and farmers in Exchange, Insukamini and Ruchanyu Irrigation Schemes are honored for their contributions to this study’s success.
References
- 1. Siders AR. Adaptive capacity to climate change: A synthesis of concepts, methods, and findings in a fragmented field. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2019;10(3):e573.
- 2.
UN. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Washington DC: United Nations; 2015.
- 3.
UN. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Paris, France: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 2015.
- 4.
IPCC. Annex B: Glossary of terms. Cambridge University Press Cambridge; 2001. p. 16.
- 5.
IPCC. IPCC WGII AR5 Chapter 22. Africa Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014.
- 6. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global environmental change. 2005;15(2):77–86.
- 7. Gain AK, Rouillard JJ, Benson D. Can integrated water resources management increase adaptive capacity to climate change adaptation? A critical review. 2013.
- 8. Ma’Mun SR, Loch A, Young MD. Robust irrigation system institutions: A global comparison. Global Environmental Change. 2020;64:102128.
- 9. Villamayor-Tomas S, García-López G. The influence of community-based resource management institutions on adaptation capacity: A large-n study of farmer responses to climate and global market disturbances. Global Environmental Change. 2017;47:153–66.
- 10. Thapa B, Scott CA. Institutional strategies for adaptation to water stress in farmer-managed irrigation systems of Nepal. International Journal of the Commons. 2019;13(2).
- 11. Cox M, Arnold G, Tomás SV. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society. 2010;15(4).
- 12. Ostrom E. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal. 2011;39(1):7–27.
- 13. Wang RY, Lam W-F, Wang J. Irrigation Management in East Asia: Institutions, Socio-Economic Transformation and Adaptations. Water Alternatives. 2021;14(2):319–31.
- 14. Raub W, Buskens V, Frey V. The rationality of social structure: Cooperation in social dilemmas through investments in and returns on social capital. Social Networks. 2013;35(4):720–32.
- 15. Villamayor-Tomas S, Iniesta-Arandia I, Roggero M. Are generic and specific adaptation institutions always relevant? An archetype analysis of drought adaptation in Spanish irrigation systems. Ecology and Society. 2020;25(1).
- 16. Bisaro A, Hinkel J. Governance of social dilemmas in climate change adaptation. Nature Climate Change. 2016;6(4):354–9.
- 17.
Peters BG. Institutional theory. The SAGE handbook of governance. 2011:78–90.
- 18. Engle NL, Lemos MC. Unpacking governance: building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil. Global Environmental Change. 2010;20(1):4–13.
- 19.
Plummer R, Armitage D. Integrating perspectives on adaptive capacity and environmental governance. Adaptive capacity and environmental governance: Springer; 2010. p. 1–19.
- 20. Andrijevic M, Cuaresma JC, Muttarak R, Schleussner C-F. Governance in socioeconomic pathways and its role for future adaptive capacity. Nature Sustainability. 2020;3(1):35–41.
- 21. Brockhaus M, Djoudi H, Kambire H. Multi-level governance and adaptive capacity in West Africa. International Journal of the Commons. 2012;6(2).
- 22. Bauer A, Feichtinger J, Steurer R. The governance of climate change adaptation in 10 OECD countries: challenges and approaches. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 2012;14(3):279–304.
- 23. Aylett A. Institutionalizing the urban governance of climate change adaptation: Results of an international survey. Urban Climate. 2015;14:4–16.
- 24. Ampaire EL, Jassogne L, Providence H, Acosta M, Twyman J, Winowiecki L, et al. Institutional challenges to climate change adaptation: A case study on policy action gaps in Uganda. Environmental Science & Policy. 2017;75:81–90.
- 25. Phuong LTH, Biesbroek GR, Wals AE. Barriers and enablers to climate change adaptation in hierarchical governance systems: the case of Vietnam. Journal of environmental policy & planning. 2018;20(4):518–32.
- 26. Nthambi M, Markova-Nenova N, Wätzold F. Quantifying Loss of Benefits from Poor Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Projects: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Farmers in Kenya. Ecological Economics. 2021;179:106831.
- 27. Termeer CJ, Dewulf A, Biesbroek GR. Transformational change: governance interventions for climate change adaptation from a continuous change perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2017;60(4):558–76.
- 28. Charles A. People, oceans and scale: governance, livelihoods and climate change adaptation in marine social–ecological systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2012;4(3):351–7.
- 29. Chu EK. The governance of climate change adaptation through urban policy experiments. Environmental Policy and Governance. 2016;26(6):439–51.
- 30. Williams DS, Rosendo S, Sadasing O, Celliers L. Identifying local governance capacity needs for implementing climate change adaptation in Mauritius. Climate Policy. 2020;20(5):548–62.
- 31. Muench S, Bavorova M, Pradhan P. Climate change adaptation by smallholder tea farmers: a case study of Nepal. Environmental Science & Policy. 2021;116:136–46.
- 32. Alemayehu A, Bewket W. Determinants of smallholder farmers’ choice of coping and adaptation strategies to climate change and variability in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Environmental Development. 2017;24:77–85.
- 33. Anderies J, Janssen M, Schlager E. Institutions and the performance of coupled infrastructure systems. International Journal of the Commons. 2016;10(2).
- 34. Villamayor-Tomas S. Disturbance features, coordination and cooperation: an institutional economics analysis of adaptations in the Spanish irrigation sector. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2018;14(3):501–26.
- 35. Meinzen-Dick R, Raju KV, Gulati A. What affects organization and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation systems in India. World development. 2002;30(4):649–66.
- 36. Lam WF. Foundations of a robust social-ecological system: irrigation institutions in Taiwan. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2006;2(2):203–26.
- 37. Cifdaloz O, Regmi A, Anderies JM, Rodriguez AA. Robustness, vulnerability, and adaptive capacity in small-scale social-ecological systems: The Pumpa Irrigation System in Nepal. Ecology and Society. 2010;15(3).
- 38. Cox M, Ross JM. Robustness and vulnerability of community irrigation systems: The case of the Taos valley acequias. J Environ Econo Manag. 2011;61(3):254–66.
- 39. van Rooyen AF, Moyo M, Bjornlund H, Dube T, Parry K, Stirzaker R. Identifying leverage points to transition dysfunctional irrigation schemes towards complex adaptive systems. Intern J Water Res Develop. 2020;36(sup1):S171–S98.
- 40.
IFAD. Smallholder Irrigation Revitalization Programme Final project design report. Republic of Zimbabwe. Harare: IFAD; 2016.
- 41. Fanadzo M, Ncube B. Challenges and opportunities for revitalising smallholder irrigation schemes in South Africa. Water SA. 2018;44(3):436–47.
- 42. Mutiro J, Lautze J. Irrigation in southern Africa: Success or failure? Irrigation and Drainage. 2015;64(2):180–92.
- 43. Ford JD, King N, Galappaththi EK, Pearce T, McDowell G, Harper SL. The resilience of indigenous people to environmental change. CellPress. 2020.
- 44. Ugwu P. Women in agriculture: Challenges facing women in African farming. Project report of African Women in Agriculture. 2019.
- 45. Denton F. Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: Why does gender matter? Gender & Development. 2002;10(2):10–20.
- 46.
Nelson V. Climate change and gender: What role for agriculture research among smallholder farmers in Africa? Kampala: CIAT; 2011.
- 47. Djoudi H, Brockhaus M. Is adaptation to climate change gender neutral? Lessons from communities dependent on livestock and forests in northern Mali. International Forestry Review. 2011;13(2).
- 48. Zamasiya B, Nyikahadzoi K, Mukamuri BB. Factors influencing smallholder farmer’s behavioural intention towards adaptation to climate change in transitional climatic zones: A case study of Hwedza District in Zimbabwe. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017;198:233–9. pmid:28463773
- 49.
Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Third Edition: Guilford publications; 2022.
- 50. Webb JB, Fiery MF, Jafari N. “You better not leave me shaming!”: Conditional indirect effect analyses of anti-fat attitudes, body shame, and fat talk as a function of self-compassion in college women. Body image. 2016;18:5–13. pmid:27236471
- 51. Canfield CF, Saudino KJ. The influence of infant characteristics and attention to social cues on early vocabulary. Journal of experimental child psychology. 2016;150:112–29. pmid:27280332
- 52. Kung FY, Eibach RP, Grossmann I. Culture, fixed-world beliefs, relationships, and perceptions of identity change. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2016;7(7):631–9.
- 53. Blashill AJ, Vander Wal JS. The role of body image dissatisfaction and depression on HAART adherence in HIV positive men: Tests of mediation models. AIDS and Behavior. 2010;14(2):280–8. pmid:19888646
- 54. Gaunt R, Scott J. Parents’ involvement in childcare: Do parental and work identities matter? Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2014;38(4):475–89.
- 55. Smith NA, Martinez LR, Sabat IE. Weight and gender in service jobs: The importance of warmth in predicting customer satisfaction. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly. 2016;57(3):314–28.
- 56. Thai N, Taber-Thomas BC, Pérez-Edgar KE. Neural correlates of attention biases, behavioral inhibition, and social anxiety in children: An ERP study. Developmental cognitive neuroscience. 2016;19:200–10. pmid:27061248
- 57. Goodboy AK, Martin MM, Brown E. Bullying on the school bus: Deleterious effects on public school bus drivers. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 2016;44(4):434–52.
- 58. Matsa M. Crop diversity measurement at Dufuya gardens and Insukamini irrigation scheme in Lower Gweru communal lands. J Environ Scie Engin B. 2012;1(5B).
- 59. Chanza N, Chigona A, Nyahuye A, Mataera-Chanza L, Mundoga T, Nondo N. Diagnosing barriers to climate change adaptation at community level: Reflections from Silobela, Zimbabwe. GeoJ. 2019;84(3):771–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9890-3.
- 60. Chancellor F, Hide J. Smallholder Irrigation: ways forward: Guidelines for achieving appropriate scheme design. 1997;2.
- 61. Nyamayevu D, Chinopfukutwa GL. An Assessment of the Reliability and Adequacy of Irrigation Water in Small Holder Irrigation Schemes. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research (IJSER) 2018.
- 62. Mhembwe S, Chiunya N, Dube E. The contribution of small-scale rural irrigation schemes towards food security of smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. Jàmbá: J Disas Risk Stud. 2019;11(1):1–11. pmid:31745405
- 63. Bellhouse D. 1 A brief history of random sampling methods. Handbook of statistics. 1988;6:1–14.
- 64. Hahn MB, Riederer AM, Foster SO. The Livelihood Vulnerability Index: A pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change—A case study in Mozambique. Global environmental change. 2009;19(1):74–88.
- 65. Sarker MNI, Wu M, Alam G, Shouse RC. Livelihood vulnerability of riverine-island dwellers in the face of natural disasters in Bangladesh. Sustainability. 2019;11(6):1623.
- 66.
Hutcheson GD. Ordinary least-squares regression. Moutinho L and Hutcheson GD, The SAGE dictionary of quantitative management research. 2011:224–8.
- 67.
Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions: sage; 1991.
- 68. Azumah SB, Adzawla W, Donkoh SA, Anani PY. Effects of climate adaptation on households’ livelihood vulnerability in South Tongu and Zabzugu districts of Ghana. Climate and Development. 2021;13(3):256–67.
- 69. Carr ER, Thompson MC. Gender and climate change adaptation in agrarian settings: Current thinking, new directions and research frontiers. Geography Compass. 2014;8(3):182–97.
- 70. Feinstein N, Mach KJ. Three roles for education in climate change adaptation. Climate policy. 2020;20(3):317–22.
- 71. Murken L, Gornott C. The importance of different land tenure systems for farmers’ response to climate change: A systematic review. Climate Risk Management. 2022;35(100419):1–18.
- 72. Musarandega H, Chingombe W, Pillay R. Harnessing local traditional authorities as a potential strategy to compat the vagaries of climate change in Zimbabwe. Journal of disaster risk studies. 2018;10(1):1–6.
- 73. Aryal JP, Sapkota TB, Khurana R, Khatri-Chhetri A, Rahut DB, Jat ML. Climate change and agriculture in South Asia: Adaptation options in smallholder production systems. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2020;22(6):5045–75.
- 74. ojo T, Adetoro A, Ogundeji AA, Belle J. Quantifying the determinants of climate change adaptation strategies and farmers’ access to credit in South Africa. Science of the Total Environment. 2021;792(148499):1–13. pmid:34465050
- 75. Mudombi-Rusinamhodzi G, Siziba S, Kongo V. Factors affecting smallholder farmers’ responsiveness to climate variability induced hazards in Zimbabwe. African Crop Science Journal. 2012;20:297–301.
- 76. Mwalukasa N, Mlozi MR, Sanga CA. Influence of socio-demographic factors on the use of mobile phones in accessing rice information on climate change adaptation in Tanzania. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. 2018.
- 77.
Mazuru N. Chapter nine climate change in Zimbabwe: challenges and prospects for rural women in Bikita District. Necroclimatism in a Spectral World (Dis) order?: Rain Petitioning, Climate and Weather Engineering in 21st Century Africa. 2019;255.
- 78. Patil B, Babus VS. Role of women in agriculture. Int J Applied Res. 2018;4(12):109–14.
- 79. Raney T, Anríquez G, Croppenstedt A, Gerosa S, Lowder SK, Matuschke I, et al. The role of women in agriculture. 2011.
- 80. Doss C, Meinzen-Dick R, Quisumbing A, Theis S. Women in agriculture: Four myths. Global food security. 2018;16:69–74. pmid:29552461
- 81. Mosello B, Oates N, Jobbins G. Pathways for irrigation development: Policies and irrigation performance in Zimbabwe. 2017.
- 82. Van Aelst K, Holvoet N. Intersections of gender and marital status in accessing climate change adaptation: Evidence from rural Tanzania. World development. 2016;79:40–50.
- 83. Panda A, Sharma U, Ninan K, Patt A. Adaptive capacity contributing to improved agricultural productivity at the household level: Empirical findings highlighting the importance of crop insurance. Global Environmental Change. 2013;23(4):782–90.
- 84. Sheng Tey Y, Brindal M, Li E, Gill G, Bruwer J, Abdullah AM, et al. Factors affecting the selection of information sources of sustainable agricultural practices by Malaysian vegetable farmers. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information. 2018;19(2):162–75.
- 85. Choden K, Keenan RJ, Nitschke CR. An approach for assessing adaptive capacity to climate change in resource dependent communities in the Nikachu watershed, Bhutan. Ecological Indicators. 2020;114:106293.
- 86. Moyo M, Van Rooyen A, Moyo M, Chivenge P, Bjornlund H. Irrigation development in Zimbabwe: Understanding productivity barriers and opportunities at Mkoba and Silalatshani irrigation schemes. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2017;33(5):740–54.
- 87. Mutambara S, Munodawafa A. Production challenges and sustainability of smallholder irrigation schemes in Zimbabwe. Journal of biology, agriculture and healthcare. 2014;4(15):87–96.
- 88. Thathsarani U, Gunaratne L. Constructing and index to measure the adaptive capacity to climate change in Sri Lanka. Procedia engineering. 2018;212:278–85.
- 89. Lemos MC, Agrawal A, Eakin H, Nelson DR, Engle NL, Johns O. Building adaptive capacity to climate change in less developed countries. Climate science for serving society: Springer; 2013. p. 437–57.
- 90. Asante FA, Boakye AA, Egyir IS, Jatoe JB. Climate change and farmers’ adaptive capacity to strategic innovations: The case of northern Ghana. 2012.
- 91. Frank E, Eakin H, Lopez-Carr D. Social identity, perception and motivation in adaptation to climate risk in the coffee sector of Chiapas, Mexico. Global environmental change. 2011;21(1):66–76.
- 92. Mugabe F, Munodawafa A, Dimes J, Nanja D, Carberry P. Building adaptive capacity to cope with increasing vulnerability due to climate change: final technical report-Zimbabwe (30 September 2010). 2010.
- 93. Canevari‐Luzardo LM, Berkhout F, Pelling M. A relational view of climate adaptation in the private sector: How do value chain interactions shape business perceptions of climate risk and adaptive behaviours? Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020;29(2):432–44.
- 94. Ndlovu T, Moyo F, Zikhali W, Mabhena C. Farmer participation: A drive towards sustainable agricultural production in Makwe irrigation scheme, Zimbabwe. Glob J Agric Econ Ext Rural Dev. 2015;3:308–20.
- 95. Okali C. Gender analysis: engaging with rural development and agricultural policy processes. 2012.
- 96. Shortall S. Gender mainstreaming and the common agricultural policy. Gender, Place & Culture. 2015;22(5):717–30.
- 97. Muchuru S, Nhamo G. A review of climate change adaptation measures in the African crop sector. Climate and development. 2019;11(10):873–85.
- 98. Mano R, Nhemachena C. Assessment of the economic impacts of climate change on agriculture in Zimbabwe: A Ricardian approach. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2007;(4292).
- 99. Mutambara S, Darkoh M, Atlhopheng J. Land tenure security issues in smallholder irrigation schemes in Zimbabwe. J Soc Sci Res. 2015;9(3):1871–81.
- 100. Makanyisa I, Chemhuru M, Masitera E. The land tenure system and the environmental implications on Zimbabwean society: examining the pre-colonial to post-independent Zimbabwean thinking and policies through history and philosophy. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa. 2012;14(6):175–83.
- 101. Mutambara S, Darkoh MB, Atlhopheng JR. A comparative review of water management sustainability challenges in smallholder irrigation schemes in Africa and Asia. Agricultural Water Management. 2016;171:63–72.
- 102. Nhundu K, Mushunje A, Zhou L, Aghdasi F. Institutional determinants of farmer participation in irrigation development post fast-track land reform program in Zimbabwe. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development. 2015;7(2):9–18.
- 103. Muhoyi E, Mbonigaba J. Stakeholder consultations on small-scale irrigation schemes’ constraints in Zimbabwe. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2021:1–20.
- 104. Njeru TN, Mano Y, Otsuka K. Role of access to credit in rice production in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of Mwea irrigation scheme in Kenya. Journal of African Economies. 2016;25(2):300–21.
- 105. Shoji M, Aoyagi K, Kasahara R, Sawada Y, Ueyama M. Social capital formation and credit access: Evidence from Sri Lanka. World development. 2012;40(12):2522–36.
- 106. Muchomba FM. Women’s land tenure security and household human capital: Evidence from Ethiopia’s land certification. World development. 2017;98:310–24. pmid:28890597
- 107. Ma X, Heerink N, van Ierland E, van den Berg M, Shi X. Land tenure security and land investments in Northwest China. China Agricultural Economic Review. 2013.
- 108. Nkomoki W, Bavorová M, Banout J. Adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and food security threats: Effects of land tenure in Zambia. Land Use Policy. 2018;78:532–8.
- 109. Dube L, Guveya E. Land tenure security and farm investments amongst small scale commercial farmers in Zimbabwe. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa. 2013;15(5):107–21.
- 110.
Zikhali P, editor Fast Track Land Reform Programme, tenure security and investments in soil conservation: Micro‐evidence from Mazowe District in Zimbabwe. Natural Resources Forum; 2010: Wiley Online Library.
- 111.
Pankhurst D, Jacobs S. Land tenure, gender relations, and agricultural production: The case of Zimbabwe’s peasantry. Agriculture, Women, and Land: Routledge; 2019. p. 202–27.
- 112.
Gaidzanwa RB, editor Women and land in Zimbabwe. conference on Why Women Matter in Agriculture, Sweden, 4â; 2011.
- 113. Chigbu UE, Paradza G, Dachaga W. Differentiations in women’s land tenure experiences: Implications for women’s land access and tenure security in Sub-Saharan Africa. Land. 2019;8(2):22.
- 114. Ossome L, Naidu SC. Does Land Still Matter? Gender and Land Reforms in Zimbabwe. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy. 2021;10(2):344–70.