Extrafine HFA-beclomethasone-formoterol vs. nonextrafine combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long acting β2-agonist in patients with persistent asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ting Liu; Dan Yang; Chuntao Liu

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257075

Abstract

Objective

Airway inflammation in asthma involves not only the central airways but extends to peripheral airways. Lung deposition may be key for an appropriate treatment of asthma. We compared the clinical effects of extrafine hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-beclomethasone-formoterol (BDP-F) versus equipotent doses of nonextrafine combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long acting β2-agonist (ICS-LABA) in asthma.

Methods

We identified eligible studies by a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Data analysis was performed with the Review Manager 5.3.5 software (Cochrane IMS, 2014).

Results

A total of 2326 patients with asthma from ten published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were enrolled for analysis. Change from baseline in morning pre-dose peak expiratory flow (PEF), evening pre-dose PEF and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) were detected no significant differences between extrafine HFA-BDP-F and nonextrafine ICS-LABAs (p = 0.23, p = 0.99 and p = 0.23, respectively). Extrafine HFA-BDP-F did not show any greater benefit in forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75%), the parameter concerning peripheral airways (MD 0.03L/s, p = 0.65; n = 877). There were no substantial differences between interventions in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels or in its alveolar fraction. The overall analysis showed no significant benefit of extrafine HFA-BDP-F over nonextrafine ICS-LABA in improving Asthma Control Test (ACT) score (p = 0.30) or decreasing the number of puffs of rescue medication use (p = 0.16). Extrafine HFA-BDP-F did not lead to less exacerbations than nonextrafine ICS-LABA (RR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.20; I² = 0; p = 0.15).

Conclusion

Enrolled RCTs of extrafine HFA-BDP-F have demonstrated no significant advantages over the equivalent combination of nonextrafine ICS-LABA in improving pulmonary function concerning central airways or peripheral airways, improving asthma symptom control or reducing exacerbation rate.

Citation: Liu T, Yang D, Liu C (2021) Extrafine HFA-beclomethasone-formoterol vs. nonextrafine combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long acting β2-agonist in patients with persistent asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 16(9): e0257075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075

Editor: Daoud Al-Badriyeh, Qatar University, QATAR

Received: November 15, 2020; Accepted: August 23, 2021; Published: September 3, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease leading to chronic inflammation in the airways. The combination treatment of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long acting β2-agonist (LABA) is recommended as a first-line therapy for subjects with moderate-to-severe asthma [1]. Currently, four fixed dose combinations (FDCs) of ICS-LABA have been developed and commercially available [2]: fluticasone propionate-formoterol fumarate (FP-F), fluticasone proprionate-salmeterol xinafoate (FP-S), budesonide-formoterol fumarate (BUD-F) and beclometasone dipropionate-formoterol fumarate (BDP-F). Among current therapies, BDP-F fixed combination delivers extrafine particles of BDP (100 ug) and F (6 ug) per actuation via a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI), allowing high lung deposition and homogeneous distribution throughout the whole bronchial tree [3, 4].

As is known, airway inflammation in asthma involves not only the central airways but extends to peripheral airways [5]. The inflammatory process in the distal airways is similar to that in the central ones, but sometimes more severe, involving the adventitia more than submucosa [6]. Small airways (< 2 mm in diameter), significantly contribute to the pathogenesis of asthma in terms of bronchoconstriction and hyper-responsiveness [5, 7]. Increasing evidence is linked to a single reference from over 10 years ago in the correlation between small airways impairment and poor asthma control [8]. Moreover, the outer wall of small airways was found to be the major site of airway remodeling in patients with fatal asthma [9]. Inflammatory and functional changes of the small airways strongly contribute to the heterogeneous manifestations of chronic diseases such as asthma, suggesting that the site should not be neglected in the monitoring or management for the diseases [10]. These twenty years, various drug formulations and inhalation techniques have been developed in order to optimize the delivery of ICS-LABA to the whole bronchial tree.

Modulite® (Chiesi Farmaceutici, Parma, Italy), a new technology has been developed to obtain extrafine formulation of new drugs and reformulation of preexisting drugs. The particle size can be tailored within the respirable range (coarser particles or extrafine ones) by Modulite® technology and this property may lead to deeper pulmonary penetration [11, 12]. This technology has been applied to develop the first FDCs containing extrafine formulation of BDP and BDP-F both in the pMDI and dry powder inhaler (DPI) versions, with a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of BDP 1.4 μm and FF 1.5 μm in pMDI and BDP 1.5 μm and FF 1.4 μm in NEXThaler, respectively [13]. Extrafine BDP-F of smaller particles is able to improve a more peripheral lung deposition of the medication [14] and distribute uniformly in the bronchial tree [15], compared to those of FP-S DPI and BUD-F DPI. In addition, the new therapeutic extrafine formulations inducing a more homogeneous drug distribution in the respiratory tract have been shown to reach the small airways with reduced oropharyngeal deposition [11].

Extrafine HFA-BDP has been found to be more potent than the nonextrafine formulation on the small airway inflammation due to its high penetration of the medication into the lung [16, 17]. A pilot study evaluated effects of treatment with extrafine BDP-F on airway function and the findings suggest that extrafine BDP-F has additional benefits on both large and small airways compared with nonextrafine FP-S [18]. A significant improvement of functional parameters reflecting small airway obstruction was also reported in another preliminary study [19]. In a randomized controlled parallel group trial comparing extrafine BDP-F and the marketed combinations of nonextrafine ICS-LABA, a significant decrease in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels were observed in extrafine BDP-F, indicating an additional favorable effect on peripheral airway inflammation [20]. The reported adverse events of extrafine BDP-F were comparable to nonextrafine ICS-LABA in asthmatics [21–25]. Nevertheless, Papi et al found that the FDCs of BDP-F was not superior to nonextrafine ICS-LABA (FP-S or BUD-F) in terms of lung function, asthma control, symptom scores, rescue medication use or the rate of asthma exacerbations [23–25], except for the advantage of a more rapid onset of bronchodilation over FP-S [24].

Thus, although this new relevance appears to warrant a pharmacological advantage, its potency on clinical benefits in asthma needs to be confirmed. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the clinical effects and tolerability profile of treatments with extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus equipotent doses of nonextrafine ICS-LABA in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance [26].

Search strategy

We identified eligible studies by a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, using the combination of keywords including “beclomethasone” and “asthma”. The last search was performed on June 2021. Detailed search strategies were shown in S1 File. Additional relevant and eligible studies were captured by scanning the reference lists of the included articles and previous reviews to minimize potential publication bias. We conducted a search of relevant files on the website of the international registry of clinical trials (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/). We did not impose any restrictions on language of publication.

Selection and exclusion criteria

Eligible studies were defined based on the following criteria: (1) Study design: we limited the specific publication type to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We only included RCTs in this review because of their highest quality, in order to ensure the high quality of our data analysis. (2) Population: trials involving patients with a diagnosis of asthma regardless of age, gender or disease severity were included. (3) Comparison: intervention treatment was extrafine-particle ICS-LABA versus nonextrafine-particle ICS-LABA. (4) Outcomes: we included studies reporting any of the following end points: Measures of lung function: change from baseline in morning pre-dose peak expiratory flow (PEF, L/min), evening pre-dose PEF (L/min), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1, L), forced vital capacity (FVC, L), and other outcome variables of small airway dysfunction such as forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75%, L/s), Delta R5-R20 [kPa/(L*s)]; Airway inflammation: FeNO (ppb) and alveolar nitric oxide (C_Alv, ppb); Asthma control: Asthma Control Test (ACT) score, daytime symptom score and night-time symptom score, number of puffs of rescue medication per day; Exacerbations: number of patients with at least 1 severe asthma exacerbation requiring administration of oral corticosteroids; Adverse events (AEs): incidence of any AEs and serious AEs. Serious AEs is defined as an event that jeopardizes the patient or may require medical or surgical intervention, such as fatal or life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, etc. Given their lacking information concerning essential data, trials published without full text such as conference papers solely in abstract form or letters were also excluded.

Study selection, data extraction and assessment of risk of bias

Two reviewers worked independently in stages including study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. All divergences were resolved by the involvement of a third reviewer to reach a mutual consensus.

The title and abstract of each study identified for inclusion was assessed for further full-text evaluation. We carried out the initial search reports or publications, identified studies according to the inclusion criteria and recorded ineligible studies with reasons for exclusion. Duplicates and collated multiple reports of the same study were discarded, so that each trial instead of each report was the unit of interest in this review.

Relative data from the included studies were separately extracted in a standardized Cochrane data extraction regulation [27]. In addition, we tried to search supplementary appendix or contact the corresponding author to acquire essential missing data.

The assessment of risk of biases was performed based on the methodology reported by each enrolled study following the rules specified in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions which consists of seven items in six domains [28]. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRAED) approach [29].

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed by two independent statisticians blinded to the study protocol with the Review Manager 5.3.5 software (Cochrane IMS, 2014). We conducted analysis by intention to treat (ITT) involving all participants to minimize bias.

In order to include multiple interventions of each study and avoid double-counts of the patients in the shared intervention groups, doses were combined in only one group [27]. Dichotomous data and continuous data were analyzed as risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) respectively, and all data were presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Trials were pooled with a fixed-effect model, or a random-effect model if moderate or substantial heterogeneity was identified. We efficiently evaluated statistical heterogeneity by the I² test, with 25%, 26%-39%, 40%-60%, and 60%-100%, considered to represent absence, unimportant, moderate, and substantial degrees of inconsistency respectively [30]. P values of < 0.05 (2-tailed test) were rendered statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses for some outcomes were also performed to replace alternative decisions or bounds of values for decisions that were subjective. We tried to make the sub-group analysis of treatment duration on effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on AEs and serious AEs.

We failed to evaluate publication bias with a funnel plot and Egger’s test, due to the limited number of included studies.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and the public were not involved in the design and conception of this study. No patients were involved in developing the research question or the outcome measures. Our study used aggregated data from already published researches, it is not easy to disseminate the results of the research to participants directly.

Results

Study identification and selection

The literature search process and study selection flow are shown in Fig 1. A more detailed description of the key studies excluded was shown in S2 File. We avoided double-counting of participants from overlapping studies. After thorough review, a total of 2326 patients with asthma from ten published RCTs were enrolled for analysis. All studies were published from 2007 to 2018 [18–25, 31, 32].

Download:

Fig 1. Flowchart for identification of studies selected.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.g001

Study characteristics

Additional detailed characteristics on the enrolled studies are summarized in Table 1. All studies were conducted in patients aged 18–65 years who had been diagnosed with asthma. The severity of disease was generally moderate to severe and baseline FEV₁ (% pre) ranged from 65.4±10.8 to 97.2±13.6 in the studies. All enrolled studies were randomized controlled trials of which two were crossover trials [19, 22] and eight studies were parallel-group trials [18, 20, 21, 23–25, 31, 32]. Treatment duration of studies ranged from 3 to 24 weeks. Patients were randomized to either extrafine HFA-BDP-F via pMDI (FOSTER^®; Chiesi Farmaceutici, Italy) [18–25, 31, 32] or nonextrafine ICS-LABA, including FP-S via DPI (Seretide^® Diskus^®; GlaxoSmithKline, UK) [18–20, 23, 32], FP/S via pMDI (Seretide^®; GlaxoSmithKline, UK) [21, 24], BUD-F via DPI (Symbicort^® Turbuhaler^®; AstraZeneca, Sweden) [20, 22, 25] and Chloroflurocarbon (CFC)-BDP and formoterol via separate inhalers (Becloforte^®; Allen & Hanburys, and Foradil^® Aerolizer^®; Novartis) [31]. All intervention medications were administered twice daily. Dosages and administrations are summarized in Table 1.

Download:

Table 1. Characteristics of included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.t001

Quality assessment

The risk of bias is presented briefly in Fig 2. On the whole, the included trials in our meta-analysis had relatively high quality. Blindness breaking were considered due to different inhalers used between the intervention groups, thus several studies were labeled with “high” risk of performance bias [18–20, 22, 23, 25, 31].

Download:

Fig 2. Risk of bias summary of included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.g002

Heterogeneit

There were no significant inconsistencies in almost all the outcomes. Pooled analysis of change of lung function such as morning and evening PEF, FEV₁, FVC and FEF25-75% were consistent (I² = 0); similar results were found in ACT scores, rescue medication use, incidence of exacerbations and adverse events; and unimportant heterogeneity existed in the change of daytime symptom score.

Outcomes

Lung function.

In general, extrafine HFA-BDP-F via pMDI showed no statistically significant improvement in pulmonary function compared with nonextrafine ICS-LABA. Change from baseline in morning pre-dose PEF or evening pre-dose PEF were detected no significant difference between interventions (MD -4.85 L/min, 95% CI: -12.72 to 3.02, p = 0.23, n = 1535, Fig 3; MD -0.05 L/min, 95% CI: -7.38 to 7.27, p = 0.99, n = 1119, S1 Fig). No significant increase in FEV₁ and FVC was found in patients receiving extrafine HFA-BDP-F compared to those receiving nonextrafine ICS-LABA (MD 0.03 L, p = 0.23 n = 1565, Fig 4; MD 0.04 L, p = 0.23 n = 1535, S2 Fig). The GRAED quality of morning or evening PEF, FEV1 and FVC were judged to be moderate (Table 2). In addition, pooled analysis did not show any greater benefit of extrafine HFA-BDP-F in the parameters concerning peripheral airways FEF25-75% (MD 0.03L/s, p = 0.65; n = 877) and its percentage of predicted normal (MD 0.44, p = 0.86; n = 526). No significant changes of other parameters concerning small airway dysfunction in body plethysmography, impulse oscillometry or forced spirometry were detected.

Download:

Fig 3. The effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on morning pre-dose peak expiratory flow change from baseline.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.g003

Download:

Fig 4. The effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on forced expiratory volume in one second.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.g004

Download:

Table 2. Summary of findings including GRADE quality assessment of evidence trials.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.t002

Airway inflammation.

Due to incomplete data, we failed to conduct a pooled analysis of changes in airway inflammation. In Bulac 2015, there were no substantial changes in FeNO levels in nonextrafine FP-S or BUD-F but a significant decrease of 2.24 ppb in extrafine HFA-BDP-F (p = 0.001) [20]. However, in another study, no significant decreases of FeNO from baseline were observed in either extrafine HFA-BDP-F or nonextrafine BUD-F [22]. Decreased mean C_Alv were observed after 4 weeks of treatment and the adjusted geometric mean (log transformed data) was 0.942 ppb (95% CI: 0.778 to 1.141 ppb) with extrafine HFA-BDP-F and 0.903 ppb (95% CI:0.741–1.099 ppb) with nonextrafine BUD-F [22].

Asthma control.

In brief, the overall analysis showed no significant benefit of extrafine HFA-BDP-F over nonextrafine ICS-LABA in asthma control. Change of ACT score from baseline was assessed in two studies [19, 21] and the pooled result was not significantly different between extrafine HFA-BDP-F group and the control group (MD -0.48, 95% CI: -1.39 to 0.43; I² = 0%; p = 0.30). Similar findings were found in daytime symptom score change (MD 0.04, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.18; I² = 38%; p = 0.55) and night-time symptom score change (MD -0.02, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.11; I² = 0; p = 0.74).

Rescue medication use.

There was no significant benefit of extrafine HFA-BDP-F over nonextrafine ICS-LABA in decreasing the number of puffs of daytime and night-time rescue medication use in pooled data of three trials [24, 25, 31] (MD 0.10, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.25; I² = 0; p = 0.16).

Exacerbations.

Data of exacerbation rate was measured in six trials with 1966 patients [21, 23–25, 31, 32] and the pooled effect showed that extrafine HFA-BDP-F might lead to less exacerbations than nonextrafine ICS-LABA but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.20; I² = 0; p = 0.15; Fig 5). Certainty in the evidence was judged to be moderate, mainly because of not blinding the participants and personnel in some trials (Table 2). In addition, the time to the first exacerbation in the Kaplan–Meier survival estimate was not statistically different between groups, as reported in three studies (p = 0.358, 0.342, 0.36, respectively) [23–25].

Download:

Fig 5. The effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on exacerbation rate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.g005

Adverse events.

The incidence of any AEs and serious AEs between extrafine HFA- BDP-F and nonextrafine ICS-LABA were reported in 7 trials containing 2022 patients [21–25, 31, 32]. There were no meaningful differences observed in any AEs (RR 1.01; I² = 0; p = 0.92; Fig 6) or serious AEs (RR 0.80; I² = 0; p = 0.65; S3 Fig). But the evidences of AEs and serious AEs were judged to be low, mainly because of small number of patients in some trials (Table 2). The subgroup analysis showed no differences between a longer treatment duration of more than 12 weeks and less than 12 weeks (S4 and S5 Figs). No death was reported in patients receiving either intervention during the trials. Overall, all the studies having monitored vital signs (such as cardiac frequency and blood pressure), laboratory parameters and electrocardiogram (ECG) reported the treatment groups were well tolerated and no notable differences were detected between groups.

Download:

Fig 6. The effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on adverse events.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.g006

Discussion

As we know, this was the first review and meta-analysis comparing extrafine BDP-F fixed combination via pMDI with other ICS-LABAs. In this review, we demonstrated that extrafine HFA-BDP-F was as effective as FP-S or BUD-F in maintaining asthma symptom control in patients with asthma as measured via the validated questionnaire, ACT score. Extrafine HFA-BDP-F showed no more benefits in improving pulmonary function concerning central airways or peripheral airways, or reducing airway inflammation, compared with nonextrafine ICS-LABAs.

Both extrafine HFA-BDP-F and nonextrafine ICS-LABAs achieved comparable improvements for the endpoints as demonstrated by the increases in lung function during the study course in the pooled analysis, confirming that recruited moderate or severe asthmatics, unstable with the present treatment such as a daily dose of up to 1000 ug BDP or equivalent, were in need of step-up therapy with combination. Our study did not demonstrate superiority of extrafine HFA-BDP-F over nonextrafine FP-S or BUD-F in the mean change from baseline morning pre-dose PEF or evening pre-dose PEF between groups. The difference in corticosteroids dose between the treatment groups does not imply a difference in systemic exposure, since this depends not only on the nominal dose but also on the amount of drug reaching the lungs and pharmacokinetics properties of the corticosteroids [25].

As for airway inflammation, although some published studies suggested that specific formulations of ICS or ICS-LABA can modify biomarkers or parameters related to small airways, we failed to conduct a meta-analysis due to the limited number of included studies. One of the main issues in the evaluation of small airway function is the lack of a gold standard for the functional measurement of the distal lung. Techniques to test small airway function include sputum induction, impulse oscillometry, the nitrogen washout test, and alveolar fraction of exhaled nitric oxide derived by measurements of nitric oxide at multiple expiratory flows [10, 33]. Kirsten and colleagues collected induced sputum in their study but no significant changes regarding the sputum cellular composition were observed after treatment with extrafine HFA-BDP-F or nonextrafine BUD-F [22]. Delta R5-R20 in impulse oscillometry, as a parameter of small airway function, has been demonstrated to significantly be related to disease control in asthmatics [8]. A clinical trial comparing ciclesonide with fluticasone propionate in patients with mild asthma showed significant improvements in distal reactance (X5) and resistance of small airways (Delta R5-R20) [34]. Kirsten and colleagues also observed significant changes of Delta R5-R20 without significant changes of FEV₁, further strengthening the evidence that changes of small airway resistance following intervention can be demonstrated in the absence of FEV₁ improvements [22]. The characteristics of small airway obstruction include premature airway closure and air trapping, which can be assessed by an elevation of residual volume (RV) or RV/total lung capacity (TLC) ratio [35]. It is a pity that we were not able to analyses this parameter from the published RCTs. The significant decrease in FeNO levels or airway resistance in the small-particle combination group might attribute to the suppression of peripheral airway inflammation [20, 36]. Moreover, extrafine BDP has been previously reported with reduced air trapping compared with nonextrafine BDP and this has been hypothesized to be associated with greater peripheral airways patency due to more effective suppression of small airways inflammation [37]. No improvement in FVC with extrafine HFA-BDP-F reported in this study is not consistent with a greater reduction in small airways obstruction and air trapping in the previous studies [17, 38, 39].

It has been postulated that asthma control may be improved by targeting small airways. The real-life studies demonstrated the value of extrafine BDP-F in achieving asthma control [14] and improving quality of life [40]. Huchon et al [31] confirmed a significantly higher percentage of days with asthma control in the extrafine HFA-BDP-F than in the nonextrafine CFC-BDP and formoterol combination (least squares mean difference 7.66, 95% CI: 2.46 to 12.87; p = 0.004). However, in our study, comparable improvements in both groups were observed in the assessment of clinical symptoms. ACT score, daytime symptom score, and night-time symptom score change improved from baseline by a similar degree in both treatment groups.

Frequency of rescue medication use and exacerbation rates were also similar with no statistically significant difference between groups. However, it was not possible to treat exacerbation rate as a primary end-point in the present study, since exposure time was limited and more patients are needed in order to detect potential differences between treatments.

BDP delivered via a pMDI is an established ICS available worldwide, which allows patients not adequately controlled with ICS alone to continue using the same device with the same molecule and the same inhalation technique. A limitation in this study is the lack of the relation between asthma control and future risk of exacerbation due to the limited exposure time. More patients and further long-term studies are needed in order to detect potential differences between treatments. Second, some patients with mild-to-moderate asthma were relatively well controlled with initial medication. Therefore, there might have been little room for improvements in the studies. It’s a pity we failed to evaluate publication bias with a funnel plot and Egger’s test, due to the limited studies in the meta-analysis. Moreover, in most trials, MDI and DPI were used in the experimental group and the control group, respectively, resulting in difficulty to implement blindness.

Conclusion

As we know, our study is the first meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of a pMDI containing beclomethasone and formoterol with a standard combination of BUD-F or FP-S in asthmatics whose symptoms were not adequately controlled with ICS alone. Enrolled RCTs of extrafine HFA-BDP-F have demonstrated no significant advantages over the equivalent combination of nonextrafine ICS-LABA in improving pulmonary function concerning central airways or peripheral airways, improving asthma symptom control or reducing exacerbation rate.

Supporting information

S1 File. Search strategy used to identify trials.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.s001

(DOCX)

S2 File. A detailed description of the key studies excluded.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.s002

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. The effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on evening pre-dose peak expiratory flow change from baseline.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.s003

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on forced vital capacity change from baseline.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.s004

(TIF)

S3 Fig. The effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on serious adverse events.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.s005

(TIF)

S4 Fig. The subgroup analysis of treatment duration on effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on adverse events.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.s006

(TIF)

S5 Fig. The subgroup analysis of treatment duration on effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on serious adverse events.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.s007

(TIF)

S1 Table. PRISMA 2009 checklist.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257075.s008

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank all authors who provided published information for our meta-analysis.

References

1. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, 2019. Available from: www.ginasthma.org. October, 1st, 2019.
2. Tamm M, Richards DH, Beghe B, Fabbri L. Inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-agonist pharmacological profiles: effective asthma therapy in practice. Respir Med. 2012;106 Suppl 1:S9–19. pmid:23273165
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. De Backer W, Devolder A, Poli G, Acerbi D, Monno R, Herpich C, et al. Lung deposition of BDP/formoterol HFA pMDI in healthy volunteers, asthmatic, and COPD patients. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2010;23(3):137–48. pmid:20109122
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Fabbri LM, Nicolini G, Olivieri D, Papi A. Inhaled beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol extra-fine fixed combination in the treatment of asthma: evidence and future perspectives. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008;9(3):479–90. pmid:18220498
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Hamid Q, Song Y, Kotsimbos TC, Minshall E, Bai TR, Hegele RG, et al. Inflammation of small airways in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;100(1):44–51. pmid:9257786
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Saetta M, Di Stefano A, Rosina C, Thiene G, Fabbri LM. Quantitative structural analysis of peripheral airways and arteries in sudden fatal asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;143(1):138–43. pmid:1986670
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Alfieri V, Aiello M, Pisi R, Tzani P, Mariani E, Marangio E, et al. Small airway dysfunction is associated to excessive bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients. Respir Res. 2014;15:86. pmid:25158694
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Matsumoto H, Ito I, Yamaguchi M, Matsuoka H, Jinnai M, Otsuka K, et al. Relationship between small airway function and health status, dyspnea and disease control in asthma. Respiration. 2010;80(2):120–6. pmid:19776554
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Dolhnikoff M, da Silva LF, de Araujo BB, Gomes HA, Fernezlian S, Mulder A, et al. The outer wall of small airways is a major site of remodeling in fatal asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123(5):1090–7, 1097.e1. pmid:19361849
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Tulic MK, Christodoulopoulos P, Hamid Q. Small airway inflammation in asthma. Respir Res. 2001;2(6):333–9. pmid:11737932
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Ganderton D, Lewis D, Davies R, Meakin B, Brambilla G, Church T. Modulite: a means of designing the aerosols generated by pressurized metered dose inhalers. Respir Med. 2002;96 Suppl D:S3–8. pmid:12201079
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Lewis DA, Ganderton D, Meakin BJ, Brambilla G. Modulite: a simple solution to a difficult problem. Respiration. 2005;72 Suppl 1:3–5. pmid:15915006
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Corradi M, Chrystyn H, Cosio BG, Pirozynski M, Loukides S, Louis R, et al. NEXThaler, an innovative dry powder inhaler delivering an extrafine fixed combination of beclometasone and formoterol to treat large and small airways in asthma. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014;11(9):1497–506. pmid:24921434
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Müller V, Gálffy G, Eszes N, Losonczy G, Bizzi A, Nicolini G, et al. Asthma control in patients receiving inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-agonist fixed combinations. A real-life study comparing dry powder inhalers and a pressurized metered dose inhaler extrafine formulation. BMC Pulm Med. 2011;11:40. pmid:21762500
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Scichilone N, Spatafora M, Battaglia S, Arrigo R, Benfante A, Bellia V. Lung penetration and patient adherence considerations in the management of asthma: role of extra-fine formulations. J Asthma Allergy. 2013;6:11–21. pmid:23378776
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Leach C, Colice GL, Luskin A. Particle size of inhaled corticosteroids: does it matter? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(6 Suppl):S88–93. pmid:19962042
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Verbanck S, Schuermans D, Paiva M, Vincken W. The functional benefit of anti-inflammatory aerosols in the lung periphery. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118(2):340–6. pmid:16890756
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Scichilone N, Battaglia S, Sorino C, Paglino G, Martino L, Paternò A, et al. Effects of extra-fine inhaled beclomethasone/formoterol on both large and small airways in asthma. Allergy. 2010;65(7):897–902. pmid:20121764
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Corda L, Gardenghi GG, Modina D, Montemurro LT, Novali M, Tantucci C. Effects on small airway obstruction of long-term treatments with beclomethasone/formoterol hydrofluoroalkane (metered-dose inhaler) versus fluticasone/salmeterol (dry-powder inhaler) in asthma: a preliminary study. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(6):29–34. pmid:22221427
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Bulac S, Cimrin A, Ellidokuz H. The effect of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol extra-fine fixed combination on the peripheral airway inflammation in controlled asthma. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015;28(2):82–7. pmid:25050594
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Hsieh MJ, Lin YC, Lai RS, Wu CL, Lai CL, Wang CC, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of beclomethasone/formoterol and fluticasone/salmeterol fixed combination in Taiwanese asthmatic patients. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117(12):1078–1085. pmid:29292054
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Kirsten AM, Watz H, Brindicci C, Piccinno A, Magnussen H. Effects of beclomethason/formoterol and budesonide/formoterol fixed combinations on lung function and airway inflammation in patients with mild to moderate asthma—an exploratory study. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2015;31:79–84. pmid:25194884
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Papi A, Nicolini G, Crimi N, Fabbri L, Olivieri D, Rossi A, et al. Step-down from high dose fixed combination therapy in asthma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Respir Res. 2012;13(1):54. pmid:22731754
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Papi A, Paggiaro P, Nicolini G, Vignola AM, Fabbri LM; ICAT SE study group. Beclomethasone/formoterol vs fluticasone/salmeterol inhaled combination in moderate to severe asthma. Allergy. 2007;62(10):1182–8. pmid:17845589
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Papi A, Paggiaro PL, Nicolini G, Vignola AM, Fabbri LM; ICAT SE study group. Beclomethasone/formoterol versus budesonide/formoterol combination therapy in asthma. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(4):682–9. pmid:17107988
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7647. pmid:25555855
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Cochrane. Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.2.0 2017 http://handbook.cochrane.org/.Cochrane. 2017.
28. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. pmid:22008217
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Murad MH, Montori VM, Ioannidis JP, Jaeschke R, Devereaux PJ, Prasad K, et al. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2014;312(2):171–9. pmid:25005654
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60. pmid:12958120
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Huchon G, Magnussen H, Chuchalin A, Dymek L, Gonod FB, Bousquet J. Lung function and asthma control with beclomethasone and formoterol in a single inhaler. Respir Med. 2009;103(1):41–9. pmid:18977646
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Barnes N, van Noord JA, Brindicci C, Lindemann L, Varoli G, Perpiña M, et al. Stepping-across controlled asthmatic patients to extrafine beclometasone/formoterol combination. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013;26(5):555–61. pmid:23524015
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Contoli M, Kraft M, Hamid Q, Bousquet J, Rabe KF, Fabbri LM, et al. Do small airway abnormalities characterize asthma phenotypes? In search of proof. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42(8):1150–60. pmid:22805462
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Hoshino M. Comparison of effectiveness in ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on small airway function in mild asthma. Allergol Int. 2010;59(1):59–66. pmid:20035146
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Burgel PR. The role of small airways in obstructive airway diseases. Eur Respir Rev. 2011;20(119):23–33. pmid:21357889
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Anderson WJ, Zajda E, Lipworth BJ. Are we overlooking persistent small airways dysfunction in community-managed asthma? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;109(3):185–189.e2. pmid:22920073
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Goldin JG, Tashkin DP, Kleerup EC, Greaser LE, Haywood UM, Sayre JW, et al. Comparative effects of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation on small airways: assessment with functional helical thin-section computed tomography. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104(6):S258–267. pmid:10588987
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Dhillon S, Keating GM. Beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol: In an HFA-propelled pressurised metered-dose inhaler. Drugs. 2006;66(11):1475–83. pmid:16906779
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Martin RJ. Therapeutic significance of distal airway inflammation in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109(2 Suppl):S447–60. pmid:11842317
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Allegra L, Cremonesi G, Girbino G, Ingrassia E, Marsico S, Nicolini G, et al. Real-life prospective study on asthma control in Italy: cross-sectional phase results. Respir Med. 2012;106(2):205–14. pmid:22035853
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, 2019. Available from: www.ginasthma.org. October, 1st, 2019.

[ref2] 2. Tamm M, Richards DH, Beghe B, Fabbri L. Inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-agonist pharmacological profiles: effective asthma therapy in practice. Respir Med. 2012;106 Suppl 1:S9–19. pmid:23273165
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] PubMed/NCBI

[5] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. De Backer W, Devolder A, Poli G, Acerbi D, Monno R, Herpich C, et al. Lung deposition of BDP/formoterol HFA pMDI in healthy volunteers, asthmatic, and COPD patients. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2010;23(3):137–48. pmid:20109122
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] PubMed/NCBI

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Fabbri LM, Nicolini G, Olivieri D, Papi A. Inhaled beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol extra-fine fixed combination in the treatment of asthma: evidence and future perspectives. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008;9(3):479–90. pmid:18220498
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Hamid Q, Song Y, Kotsimbos TC, Minshall E, Bai TR, Hegele RG, et al. Inflammation of small airways in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;100(1):44–51. pmid:9257786
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Saetta M, Di Stefano A, Rosina C, Thiene G, Fabbri LM. Quantitative structural analysis of peripheral airways and arteries in sudden fatal asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;143(1):138–43. pmid:1986670
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Alfieri V, Aiello M, Pisi R, Tzani P, Mariani E, Marangio E, et al. Small airway dysfunction is associated to excessive bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients. Respir Res. 2014;15:86. pmid:25158694
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Matsumoto H, Ito I, Yamaguchi M, Matsuoka H, Jinnai M, Otsuka K, et al. Relationship between small airway function and health status, dyspnea and disease control in asthma. Respiration. 2010;80(2):120–6. pmid:19776554
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Dolhnikoff M, da Silva LF, de Araujo BB, Gomes HA, Fernezlian S, Mulder A, et al. The outer wall of small airways is a major site of remodeling in fatal asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123(5):1090–7, 1097.e1. pmid:19361849
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Tulic MK, Christodoulopoulos P, Hamid Q. Small airway inflammation in asthma. Respir Res. 2001;2(6):333–9. pmid:11737932
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Ganderton D, Lewis D, Davies R, Meakin B, Brambilla G, Church T. Modulite: a means of designing the aerosols generated by pressurized metered dose inhalers. Respir Med. 2002;96 Suppl D:S3–8. pmid:12201079
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Lewis DA, Ganderton D, Meakin BJ, Brambilla G. Modulite: a simple solution to a difficult problem. Respiration. 2005;72 Suppl 1:3–5. pmid:15915006
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Corradi M, Chrystyn H, Cosio BG, Pirozynski M, Loukides S, Louis R, et al. NEXThaler, an innovative dry powder inhaler delivering an extrafine fixed combination of beclometasone and formoterol to treat large and small airways in asthma. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014;11(9):1497–506. pmid:24921434
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Müller V, Gálffy G, Eszes N, Losonczy G, Bizzi A, Nicolini G, et al. Asthma control in patients receiving inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-agonist fixed combinations. A real-life study comparing dry powder inhalers and a pressurized metered dose inhaler extrafine formulation. BMC Pulm Med. 2011;11:40. pmid:21762500
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Scichilone N, Spatafora M, Battaglia S, Arrigo R, Benfante A, Bellia V. Lung penetration and patient adherence considerations in the management of asthma: role of extra-fine formulations. J Asthma Allergy. 2013;6:11–21. pmid:23378776
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Leach C, Colice GL, Luskin A. Particle size of inhaled corticosteroids: does it matter? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(6 Suppl):S88–93. pmid:19962042
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Verbanck S, Schuermans D, Paiva M, Vincken W. The functional benefit of anti-inflammatory aerosols in the lung periphery. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118(2):340–6. pmid:16890756
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Scichilone N, Battaglia S, Sorino C, Paglino G, Martino L, Paternò A, et al. Effects of extra-fine inhaled beclomethasone/formoterol on both large and small airways in asthma. Allergy. 2010;65(7):897–902. pmid:20121764
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Corda L, Gardenghi GG, Modina D, Montemurro LT, Novali M, Tantucci C. Effects on small airway obstruction of long-term treatments with beclomethasone/formoterol hydrofluoroalkane (metered-dose inhaler) versus fluticasone/salmeterol (dry-powder inhaler) in asthma: a preliminary study. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32(6):29–34. pmid:22221427
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Bulac S, Cimrin A, Ellidokuz H. The effect of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol extra-fine fixed combination on the peripheral airway inflammation in controlled asthma. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015;28(2):82–7. pmid:25050594
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] PubMed/NCBI

[77] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Hsieh MJ, Lin YC, Lai RS, Wu CL, Lai CL, Wang CC, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of beclomethasone/formoterol and fluticasone/salmeterol fixed combination in Taiwanese asthmatic patients. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117(12):1078–1085. pmid:29292054
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] PubMed/NCBI

[81] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Kirsten AM, Watz H, Brindicci C, Piccinno A, Magnussen H. Effects of beclomethason/formoterol and budesonide/formoterol fixed combinations on lung function and airway inflammation in patients with mild to moderate asthma—an exploratory study. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2015;31:79–84. pmid:25194884
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] PubMed/NCBI

[85] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Papi A, Nicolini G, Crimi N, Fabbri L, Olivieri D, Rossi A, et al. Step-down from high dose fixed combination therapy in asthma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Respir Res. 2012;13(1):54. pmid:22731754
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Papi A, Paggiaro P, Nicolini G, Vignola AM, Fabbri LM; ICAT SE study group. Beclomethasone/formoterol vs fluticasone/salmeterol inhaled combination in moderate to severe asthma. Allergy. 2007;62(10):1182–8. pmid:17845589
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Papi A, Paggiaro PL, Nicolini G, Vignola AM, Fabbri LM; ICAT SE study group. Beclomethasone/formoterol versus budesonide/formoterol combination therapy in asthma. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(4):682–9. pmid:17107988
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7647. pmid:25555855
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Cochrane. Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.2.0 2017 http://handbook.cochrane.org/.Cochrane. 2017.

[ref28] 28. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. pmid:22008217
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Murad MH, Montori VM, Ioannidis JP, Jaeschke R, Devereaux PJ, Prasad K, et al. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2014;312(2):171–9. pmid:25005654
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60. pmid:12958120
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Huchon G, Magnussen H, Chuchalin A, Dymek L, Gonod FB, Bousquet J. Lung function and asthma control with beclomethasone and formoterol in a single inhaler. Respir Med. 2009;103(1):41–9. pmid:18977646
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Barnes N, van Noord JA, Brindicci C, Lindemann L, Varoli G, Perpiña M, et al. Stepping-across controlled asthmatic patients to extrafine beclometasone/formoterol combination. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013;26(5):555–61. pmid:23524015
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Contoli M, Kraft M, Hamid Q, Bousquet J, Rabe KF, Fabbri LM, et al. Do small airway abnormalities characterize asthma phenotypes? In search of proof. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42(8):1150–60. pmid:22805462
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Hoshino M. Comparison of effectiveness in ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on small airway function in mild asthma. Allergol Int. 2010;59(1):59–66. pmid:20035146
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Burgel PR. The role of small airways in obstructive airway diseases. Eur Respir Rev. 2011;20(119):23–33. pmid:21357889
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Anderson WJ, Zajda E, Lipworth BJ. Are we overlooking persistent small airways dysfunction in community-managed asthma? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;109(3):185–189.e2. pmid:22920073
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Goldin JG, Tashkin DP, Kleerup EC, Greaser LE, Haywood UM, Sayre JW, et al. Comparative effects of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation on small airways: assessment with functional helical thin-section computed tomography. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104(6):S258–267. pmid:10588987
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Dhillon S, Keating GM. Beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol: In an HFA-propelled pressurised metered-dose inhaler. Drugs. 2006;66(11):1475–83. pmid:16906779
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Martin RJ. Therapeutic significance of distal airway inflammation in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109(2 Suppl):S447–60. pmid:11842317
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Allegra L, Cremonesi G, Girbino G, Ingrassia E, Marsico S, Nicolini G, et al. Real-life prospective study on asthma control in Italy: cross-sectional phase results. Respir Med. 2012;106(2):205–14. pmid:22035853
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

Methods

Search strategy

Selection and exclusion criteria

Study selection, data extraction and assessment of risk of bias

Statistical analysis

Patient and public involvement

Results

Study identification and selection

Study characteristics

Quality assessment

Heterogeneit

Outcomes

Lung function.

Airway inflammation.

Asthma control.

Rescue medication use.

Exacerbations.

Adverse events.

Discussion

Conclusion

Supporting information

S1 File. Search strategy used to identify trials.

S2 File. A detailed description of the key studies excluded.

S1 Fig. The effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on evening pre-dose peak expiratory flow change from baseline.

S2 Fig. The effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on forced vital capacity change from baseline.

S3 Fig. The effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on serious adverse events.

S4 Fig. The subgroup analysis of treatment duration on effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on adverse events.

S5 Fig. The subgroup analysis of treatment duration on effect of extrafine HFA-BDP-F versus nonextrafine ICS-LABA on serious adverse events.

S1 Table. PRISMA 2009 checklist.

Acknowledgments

References