Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Italian validation of the Children’s Shyness Questionnaire: Exploring associations between shyness and psychosocial functioning

  • Valentina Spensieri ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    valentina.spensieri@uniroma1.it

    Affiliation Department of Dynamic and Clinic Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

  • Rita Cerutti,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Dynamic and Clinic Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

  • Fabio Presaghi,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Psychology of Developmental and Social Processes, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

  • Simone Amendola,

    Roles Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Dynamic and Clinic Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

  • W. Ray Crozier

    Roles Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background

In recent years, researchers have begun to explore the implications of shyness for the psychosocial wellbeing of children and adolescents, exploring its association with internalizing problems. Research in an Italian context is hindered by the lack of a validated self-report measure of shyness. We report two studies aimed to assess the psychometric properties of an Italian translation of the Children’s Shyness Questionnaire (CSQ-it) and investigate its correlations with convergent and divergent constructs. The first study aimed to examine associations between CSQ-it and self-report measures of anxiety and somatic symptoms and attachment with parents and peers. The second study aimed to investigate its relations to internet addiction.

Methods

The self-report measures were completed by 550 participants in the first study and 131 participants in the second study. Parents provided information on their child’s problems. Psychometric properties were assessed by Cronbach’s alpha in both studies and by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in Study 1. The relations between shyness and measures of internalizing problems and attachments were analyzed by correlational methods. In Study 2 a moderated mediation model tested the hypothesis that the relationship between shyness and internet addiction is mediated by somatic symptoms and that shyness moderates the relationship between somatic symptoms and internet addiction.

Results

The reliability and validity of the Italian Version of the Children’s Shyness Questionnaire were satisfactory. Results from confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the single-factor model of the questionnaire previously identified in North American and Chinese studies. There were significant correlations between shyness, anxious and somatic symptomatology, impaired psychosocial functioning and specific components of attachment relationships. In Study 2 the indirect effect of shyness on internet addiction through somatic symptoms was significant as well as significantly moderated for high shyness scores but not for low levels of shyness.

Conclusion

To our knowledge this is the first study that explored the psychometric proprieties of the Children’s Shyness Questionnaire in the Italian context. Findings demonstrated that this self-reported measure of shyness has sound psychometric properties and can be used as a sensitive and appropriate instrument for the assessment of shyness in children and adolescents.

Introduction

Psychologists define shyness as a temperament or personality trait that is characterized by wariness and anxiety in the face of social novelty and perceived social evaluation, reticence in social situations, and embarrassment and self-consciousness in situations where shy individuals perceive themselves as being, or likely to be, socially evaluated [1].

This definition distinguishes it from related constructs such as behavioral inhibition and social withdrawal. Research suggests that behavioral inhibition represents a risk factor for the development of social anxiety [2,3]. However, in contrast to shyness, behavioral inhibition describes a temperamental trait that refers to avoiding interaction with social and non-social novel stimuli that are experienced as a source of anxiety or distress [4]. On the other hand, social withdrawal can be interpreted as an umbrella term describing a behavioral prototype (solitude in one form or another) deriving from different causes (both internal and external). Further, it can result from preference for solitude (i.e., internal causes), but also from social rejection (i.e. external cause).

There is evidence that behavioral inhibition predicts shyness as well as anxiety symptoms and disorders [5]. It has been shown that highly reactive (inhibited) 4-month-olds are more likely than their non-highly reactive peers to exhibit anxiety symptoms at age 7 [6]. Furthermore, adults with social anxiety disorder tend to report having been shy and socially reserved in childhood [7].Shyness appears to be characterized by high social approach and high social avoidance motivation. Specifically, shy children desire relationships with their peers but they experience uncomfortable feelings because of their inaction, self-consciousness and heightened physiological reactions.

Shyness and somatic symptoms

Chung and Evans [8] have shown that shy children suffer more than their peers from health problems such as gastrointestinal disorders that lead to more frequent absences from school. They also experience more general difficulties at school. The authors hypothesized that somatic symptoms could reflect altered physiological functioning, with a hypersecretion of cortisol that suppresses the immune system. Furthermore, frequent school absences could exacerbate feelings of anxiety and discomfort, reinforcing the withdrawn behavior of shy children. The link between shyness and somatic symptoms was identified in a recent investigation by Piko, Varga and Mellor [9], drawing upon a sample of 490 Hungarian adolescents. Shyness, particularly when combined with social withdrawal, was associated with somatic disorders, loneliness and isolation, neuroticism, anxiety and depression. Several studies have shown that nervousness, tension and worrying may contribute to the onset and persistence of somatic symptoms [10,11]. Since these traits are characteristic of shy individuals, it is reasonable to expect that shyness is associated with the development of somatic symptomatology [11]. A lack of confidence in their skills can lead shy children to disengage from school activities, resulting in a negative evaluation of their performance by teachers and low academic performance [12]. Impaired school functioning, along with their difficulties in relationships with teachers and peers, may contribute to generating conflict situations that cause profound discomfort and social anxiety symptoms, triggering physiological responses and somatic symptoms [13,14].

Shyness and social relationships

Early social interactions between children and caregivers are particularly important for child emotional development [15,16], providing information on how the child’s mental representations of self and others develop and influence the quality of future relationships [17]. The importance of first attachment relationships is related not only to the regulation of interpersonal functioning, but also to the development of a positive, coherent and well-organized self-structure. Several studies have highlighted that children with a secure attachment have better social and behavioral skills, experience fewer behavioral difficulties and enjoy more positive interactions with both peers and adults compared to children with insecure attachment [18]. In contrast, children with insecure attachments experience feelings of low self-efficacy and low self-esteem and perceive the world as an unpredictable and frightening place. In this way, they are more likely to develop inhibited behaviors in unfamiliar situations.

Empirical studies have identified significant associations between insecure attachment, shyness and behavioral inhibition [19,20]. Nachmias and colleagues [19] explored the role of attachment in the relationship between behavioral inhibition and stress reactivity in a sample of 78 18-monthold children and their mothers. Findings supported the hypothesis that attachment security can moderate the effect of behavioral inhibition on the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system which secretes cortisol, a stress hormone involved in response to physical and/or emotional stress. Similarly, Spangler and Schieche [20] reported that the activation of adrenocortical system was most prominent in infants with insecure attachment and high behavioural inhibition, demonstrating the role of secure attachment relationship as a social buffer against less adaptive temperamental dispositions.

Shyness and inhibition in childhood are associated with impairment of social functioning, including peer rejection, isolation and school failure [21]. Inhibited children are often seen as less socially competent than their peers, with increased feelings of loneliness, dissatisfaction, negative self-perception, anxiety and depression [22,23].

Chan [24] found that among a sample of 326 Chinese children and adolescents, shy teenagers tended to feel uncomfortable while interacting with others because their low self-esteem was associated with the belief that others held high expectations of them. For this reason, the fear of disappointing others, being rejected or appearing foolish, encouraged shy children to withdraw from social interactions in order to avoid a negative evaluation and the consequent social rejection. In this way, a self-perpetuation cycle is created in which the self-esteem of shy children continually diminishes, further limiting their ability to engage in social relationships [24].

Shyness and internet addiction

In recent decades there has been increasing interest in internet use among children and adolescents worldwide [13,25,26,27]. Studies of the use of the internet in adolescence have mainly focused on the consequences of its overuse, highlighting how the internet can have harmful effects on adolescent psychosocial well-being, both at school and at home [28,29,30]. However, adolescents who use the internet should not be categorized as a homogeneous group, and studies of the impact of the internet on psychosocial functioning should take individual differences into account [29]. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the study of personal characteristics, such as shyness and loneliness, which may predispose adolescents to the development of cognitive and behavioral patterns related to internet use [25].

According to self-presentation theory [31], shy individuals, like all individuals, try to control their self-image and any information that relates to their identity, in the attempt to present a positive image to others, with the aim of obtaining social approval and minimizing disapproval [32]. However, unlike their non-shy peers, shy people tend to be less confident and competent, doubting their ability to create positive impressions [33]. They typically have fewer friends, experience less satisfactory social interactions and receive less social support [34]. For these reasons the internet can provide an environment that facilitates interaction, as it allows shy people a greater opportunity to manage the impression they make on others.

With regard to negative behaviors related to the excessive use of new technologies, Chak and Leung [35] reported a significant association between high levels of shyness in adolescents and an increased probability of internet addiction. Similar findings were reported by Roberts, Smith and Pollock [34] who demonstrated the tendency of shy people, to feel braver during online conversations than in face-to-face conversations, and their more frequent use of the internet as a social medium in order to satisfy their need to be in relationship with others. These results support the notion that the internet provides an alternative environment for the fulfilment of emotional and relational needs. However, this pattern could trigger a cycle of addiction, given that the longer children and adolescents spend online, the less they are available for face-to-face interactions, leading to excessive and uncontrolled use of the internet and a consequent increase in shyness and social isolation [29]. Research into self-reported shyness and the internet use of young people in Italy requires a measure of shyness that is validated for the Italian population. This study assesses the psychometric properties of one widely used measure and considers its relation to internet use.

Methodological issues in measuring shyness in children

A substantial body of research has investigated shyness and its correlates among school-age children. Shyness has been assessed in various ways, through observations of younger children while they are interacting with a stranger [36], during free play with unfamiliar peers [37] or in kindergarten [38]. These methods are less appropriate for older children and research with school-age children has relied upon parent and teacher ratings of shyness or their responses to questionnaires such as the Child Social Preference Scale [39], an 11-item scale with items referring to a child’s typical play behavior, and the Children’s Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ) [40]. There is a dearth of self-report questionnaires for shyness, although a measure for adults, the Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness scale [41,42,43] has been widely used. It is important to assess children’s self-perceptions because shyness is not merely a matter of observed reticence and anxiousness but involves the child’s feelings of self-consciousness and fear of negative self-evaluation. Reticence is not necessarily due to shyness and shy children can have shy thoughts and feelings without visible manifestation.

Crozier [44] developed the Children’s Shyness Questionnaire (CSQ), a self-report questionnaire comprising 26 items based on interviews with children about their understanding of shyness and the situations associated with it. The interviews and subsequent questionnaire were targeted at the age range 9 to 12 years. The questionnaire was completed by a sample of 137 British children within this age range and showed satisfactory reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.82). In a second sample comprising 232 children, alpha was also 0.82. In both samples there were significant negative correlations between shyness and various measures of self-esteem, consistent with findings in the literature. Three Canadian studies have incorporated the CSQ. Findlay, Coplan and Bowker [45] reported alpha of 0.77; Coplan, Rose-Krasnor, Weeks, Kingsbury, Kingsbury and Bullock [46] reported a coefficient of 0.87. Spooner, Evans and Santos [47] reported alpha of 0.88; a supplementary factor analysis of the CSQ identified two factors: one that appeared to tap self-conscious shyness and embarrassment (‘I am easily embarrassed’) and one that tapped more social aspects of shyness and sociability (‘I am usually quiet when with others’); Deng, Liu, Coplan, Chen, Li and Sang [48] translated the scale into Chinese and submitted this version to confirmatory factor analysis. The data fitted a single-factor model; six items had loadings lower than .30 so they continued with a 19-item version with alpha = 0.83.

The CSQ was designed to produce a range of shyness scores. Specifically, each item is scored 0,1 or 2, and a total score is calculated for the set of items by adding the scores for each item. In line with Crozier’s suggestion that high levels of shyness could be defined in terms of scores more than one standard deviation above the mean. The use of a cut-off score is useful to explore whether high levels of shyness impact children’s psychological and physical wellbeing.

Current study

In order to validate the Italian Version of the CSQ (CSQ-it), two separate studies were carried out.

The aim of the first study was to develop an Italian language version of the CSQ, examine its psychometric properties and its correlations with relevant variables. This will extend the use of the scale to a European language other than English and will facilitate research into children’s shyness among the Italian population. The aim of the second study was to administer the CSQ to a fresh sample and investigate the relationship between children’s shyness and their use of the internet. We hypothesized that this association would be mediated by levels of somatic symptoms, based on evidence demonstrating that shyness may lead to excessive use of internet [35], that is in turn associated with somatic symptomatology [49].

Study 1: Validation of the CSQ-it

The CSQ was translated into Italian and its reliability and factorial structure were examined. The study tested relationships between the CSQ and four relevant variables drawn from previous research into children’s shyness: somatic symptomatology; anxiety; difficulties in physical functioning; attachment relationships to both parents and peers.

Method

Participants

Five hundred and fifty Italian schoolchildren were recruited from public schools in Italy and involved in the present study. Based on the pre-analysis data screening, a total of 82 participants were excluded from the dataset due to missing and outlier responses (>10%). In addition to missing values, exclusion criteria for participation in the current study included the presence of a diagnosed psychiatric illness, history of a significant neurological illness or brain injury and the use of medications that could affect study outcomes. The final sample comprised 468 schoolchildren (52.1% males) aged 8 to 12 years (M = 9.4, SD = .87). All participants were Caucasian.

Procedure

A written informed consent was obtained from all schoolchildren and their parents before their enrolment in the study. All participants included in the final sample (N = 468) completed the questionnaire battery, administered in written form, in the classroom during school time. The collective administration took approximately 30–45 minutes. Anonymity of participants was ensured. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome.

Measures

Assessment schedule of children’s health.

Parents were asked to report upon their child’s physical and mental health status by completing a checklist of medical illnesses and/ or existing diagnoses. Further, they had to indicate if their child was undergoing any pharmacological or psychological therapy. Parents received the questionnaire via their children, with the request to complete it at home and return materials in a sealed envelope. Anonymity of participants was ensured.

Shyness.

Shyness was assessed by means of the Children’s Shyness Questionnaire (CSQ) [44, 48]. The CSQ comprises 26 items describing the emotional and behavioral aspects of shyness (e.g., Item 1: ‘‘I find it hard to talk to someone I don’t know”; Item 6:‘‘I feel shy when I have to read aloud in front of the class”). For this age range a simple response format was required, so for each question children were asked to tick one of three boxes: “Yes”, “No”, or “Don’t know”. The questionnaire was translated into Italian using the translation–back-translation method, with the permission of the questionnaire’s author. The factor structure and psychometric properties of the CSQ-it are reported in the Results section.

Anxiety.

In order to investigate the presence and severity of anxiety disorders in children, the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) [50, 51, 52] was used. The SCARED consists of 41 items that evaluate various types of disorders, according to the nosography of the DSM-IV-TR [53]: somatic / panic symptoms, generalized anxiety, separation anxiety, social anxiety and school phobia. Children were asked to indicate how much each item described their feelings and behaviors related to the last three months using a 3-point Likert response scale, from 0 “Not true or hardly ever true” to 2 “Very true or often true”. Previous research has reported that the SCARED has good internal consistency (α = 0.74 to 0.93) and good 5-week test-retest reliability [50]. In the present study, Cronbach’s alpha for the SCARED was .92. For the “Somatic/panic symptoms” subscale it was .84, for the “Generalized anxiety” subscale .73, for the “Separation anxiety” subscale .75, for the “Social anxiety” subscale .76 and for the “School phobia” subscale” .58.

Somatic symptoms.

The Children’s Somatization Inventory-24 Child Version (CSI-24) [54,55] assessed children’s perceptions of somatic symptoms. The self-report questionnaire was translated into Italian using the translation–back-translation method, with the approval of the author. The CSI-24 comprises 24 items with a 5-point Likert response scale (0 “Not at all”; 1 “A little”; 2 “Somewhat”; 3 “A lot” and 4 “A whole lot”). Satisfactory reliability and validity of the CSI-24 has been established. In healthy pediatric samples, internal consistency (i.e., Cronbach’s alpha) of the CSI-24 was .87 [55]. Cronbach’s alpha in the current study was .89.

Child impairment.

The Functional Disability Inventory (FDI) [56] was used to explore children’s difficulties in physical and psychosocial functioning due to their physical health. The FDI was translated into Italian with the translation–back-translation method and approved by the Inventory’s author. Functional difficulties are rated in 15 items with a 5 point Likert response scale, from 0 “No trouble” to 4 “Impossible”, concerning perceptions of activity limitations during the past two weeks, including the performance of daily activities at home, school, recreation, and social situations. The FDI has good internal consistency and 3-month test-retest reliability estimates exceeding 0.60 for patients with chronic abdominal pain [56]. In the current study Cronbach’s alpha was .85.

Attachment to parents and peers.

The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA) [57,58,59] revised version for children (IPPA-R) [60] was used to explore children’s perceptions of attachment to their parents and peers. The questionnaire assesses the positive and negative affective component and the cognitive dimensions of the relationships that children have with parents and close friends. The IPPA includes two scales, one relating to parental attachment (IPPA-Parents) that comprises 28 items, and the other related to peer attachment (IPPA-Peers) consisting of 25 items. The response scale of both IPPA Parents and the IPPA Peers is a 5-point Likert scale (1 “Almost never or never true”; 2 “Not very often true”; 3 “Sometimes true”; 4 “Often true” and 5 “Almost always or always true”). Studies of the validity of constructs on both IPPA Parents and IPPA Peers scales have identified the presence of three dimensions, named Trust, Communication and Alienation. The IPPA shows good internal consistency with values between 0.72 and 0.91[58] and good test-retest reliability, with correlation coefficients of r = 0.86 for attachment to peers and r = 0.93 for attachment to parents.

In the current study the IPPA Parents scale has Cronbach’s alpha of .83 for the total score, .66 for the “Trust” dimension, .66 for the “Communication” dimension and .79 for the “Alienation” dimension. Regarding the IPPA Peers reliability, Cronbach’s alpha was .82 for the total score, .77 for the “Trust” dimension, .83 for the “Communication” dimension and .68 for the “Alienation” dimension.

Analysis strategy

Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used to investigate the dimensionality of the Italian version of the CSQ (CSQ-it). Because the CSQ items have a categorical response scale with three values (False = 0; Not false nor true = 1; True = 2) we factor analyzed the polychoric correlation matrix using the statistical package “psych” by Revelle [61] within the statistical environment of R software [62]. EFA was necessary as past studies have shown that not all items from the CSQ report satisfactory factors loadings [44,46,48]. Confirmatory Factor analysis was utilized to estimate the statistical fit of the emerging factor model of the CSQ-it. In this case, the statistical package “lavaan” developed by Rossell [63] within the R environment was used. In order to test the exploratory and confirmatory factor structure of the CSQ-it on independent samples, the total sample was randomly split into two independent samples: the first sample (N = 234) was used for the EFA; the second for the CFA (N = 234). To determine whether the sample size of the two random split samples was large enough for factor analysis, we ran a power analysis for Structural Equation Models based on the RMSEA method proposed by MacCallum, Browne and Sugawara [64] using the R package “WebPower” by Zhang and Yuan [65]. Results showed that for a RMSEA of .08 (the typical cutoff below which the model fit is considered adequate), a critical alpha of .05, and a model with 152 d.f. (one factor model with 19 observed variables) and a sample size of N = 200, the estimate’s statistical power is approximately 1.00. Considering a more stringent scenario and assuming a RMSEA of .05 (smaller than the accepted cutoff), statistical power was 0.97. Based on the power analysis, the minimum sample size to detect an RMSEA of .08, given a power of 0.80 and the model parameter indicated above, was approximately N = 51. By increasing the power to 0.90, the optimal sample size was approximately N = 62. If we consider an expected RMSEA of 0.05 and a power of 0.90, then we obtain an optimal sample size of N = 156. Based on these calculations, the size of the two random split samples seems to be adequate.

Furthermore, to investigate the predictive validity of CSQ-it we derived a cut-off score by considering the mean plus one standard deviation as the cut-off point. We compared children above the cut-off score with those below the cut-off score on all psychopathological dimensions assessed.

Results

Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the children’s shyness questionnaire

An Exploratory Factor Analysis with polychoric correlations was performed on the 26 CSQ-it items. By inspecting the eigenvalues sequence of the first solution (eigenvalues: 5.39; 1.75; 0.85), two factors reported eigenvalues greater than 1, and only the first factor explained a percentage of total variance greater than 10% (specifically 20.7%). The parallel analysis indicated that at least seven factors exceeded the factors obtained from randomly simulated polychoric correlation matrices. In line with Crozier’s [44] and others’[46,48], we selected the first factor. In line with previous research [44,46,48], we identified six items with factor loadings lower than .35 (item 3; item 9; item 15; item 16; item 18; item 23) that had been excluded from further analyses. The final version of the CSQ-it is unidimensional, comprising 19 items with factor loadings exceeding .35; it explained approximately 27% of the total correlations and demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.80).

Confirmatory factor analysis of CSQ-it.

On the second independent sample we conducted Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using the lavaan package [45] in R statistical software [62] to evaluate the fit of the single-factor model of the CSQ-it. Given that the response scale is a three-step categorical scale, we used a Maximum Likelihood estimator with robust standard errors. Results indicated that, overall, the unifactor model fit is satisfactory (Satorra-Bentler scaled χ2 = 24991, df = 152, p < .01; RMSEA = .05, 90% C.I.: .04 - .06; SRMR = 0.06). Only two fit indices were unsatisfactory: CFI = .85 and NNFI = .83. Table 1 shows the standardized factor loadings for the CSQ-it. For this sample, the reliability of the Shyness factor was good (Cronbach α = 0.81).

thumbnail
Table 1. Standardized factor loadings of the 19 items of the CSQ-it.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217722.t001

Cut-off scores for CSQ-it.

The total sample (N = 468) was divided based on the cut-off score of the CSQ in order to investigate whether shyer children were more likely to report higher levels of somatic and anxious symptoms as well as less attachment to parents and peer. In accordance with Crozier’s suggestion [44] regarding the cut-off score of the instrument (± 1 standard deviation above the mean, M = 16.5, SD = 8.0, cut off value = 24.5), shy children (N = 71) were distinguished from non-shy (N = 397). Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics carried out exclusively on the sample of shy children (N = 71). Analysis of variance showed no statistically significant differences between males (N = 31) and females (N = 40) on any of the attachment and somatic symptoms measures.

Association between shyness, attachment and somatic symptoms

To further investigate the validity of the Shyness factor that emerged from the CSQ-it, we estimated correlations with convergent and divergent constructs as measured by the SCARED, the CSI-24, the FDI, and the IPPA. A correlational analysis was conducted between the mean values of the age (in months) and gender variables and the total and subscale scores of the entire battery (CSQ-it, SCARED, CSI-24, FDI, IPPA). Overall, gender significantly correlated with the total score of the CSQ-it (r = .167, p < .01), with the “Communication” and “Trust” factors of the IPPA Peers and with the “Separation anxiety” and “Social anxiety” subscales of the SCARED. Age significantly correlated with the total score of both the CSI-24 and the SCARED, with the “Panic”, “Separation anxiety” and “School anxiety” subscales of the SCARED, as well as with the “Communication” and “Trust” factors of the IPPA Peers (see Table 3).

Regarding the relationship between the constructs investigated by the self-report questionnaires, the total score of the CSQ-it correlated significantly with the CSI-24, the FDI and the SCARED total scores. Significant correlations were also found between the CSQ-it and the three factors of the IPPA Peers as well as with the “Communication” factor of the IPPA Parents. The correlation analysis confirmed the divergent validity of the CSQ-it (see Table 3).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to use the CSQ to assess shyness among schoolchildren in Italy. Overall, the findings demonstrated the reliability and validity of the CSQ-it. The goodness of fit of the factorial structure of the CSQ within an Italian context was confirmed, showing the presence of a single factor that defined shyness, in line with previous studies [44,48]. Findings from the confirmatory factor analyses replicated the established single-factor model of this measure previously reported in samples of North American and Chinese children [44,48,66]. Analysis of the factorial structure and psychometric properties of the CSQ-it suggests that internal states such as shyness can be measured through self-report questionnaires since it involves the child’s feelings of self-consciousness and fear of negative self-evaluation. In particular, it suggests that from the age of eight years, children are sufficiently mature to understand and explain their own internal states and are competent in indicating their own levels of shyness.

Moreover, in line with the research hypotheses, higher levels of shyness were associated with anxious and somatic symptomatology, with impaired psychosocial functioning and with specific components of attachment relationships. The negative relationship between shyness and the functioning of schoolchildren also offers support for the second research hypothesis. Consistent with recent studies carried out in the Italian context that have focused on the relationship between shyness, child-teacher relationship and socio-emotional functioning [67], scores on shyness on the CSQ-it correlated with measures of somatic and anxious symptoms. The link between somatic and anxious symptoms may be due to the adoption of a passive coping style, based on social withdrawal and lack of confidence in one's ability to cope with pain. Believing that they cannot deal with pain successfully, children may have recourse to avoidance strategies that limit their daily activities while expanding and prolonging the pain itself, leading to emotional difficulties and disability [68]. Within this frame, the components of shyness play a fundamental role, as confirmed by findings that shy children are more prone to the experience somatic symptoms. Further, despite the fact that shyness is not in itself considered to be a behavioural, social or emotional disorder, its persistence and its severity can be associated with several negative outcomes in children, such as low self-esteem, loneliness and the manifestation of negative affect [66]. Moreover, shy children tend to avoid social situations more than their non-shy peers. As a result, they will have fewer opportunities to learn social skills and are more likely to develop a poor sense of self-efficacy and low self-esteem [69]. Regarding the attachment relationships of shy children, the present findings provide evidence of a link between shyness and the quality of children’s perceived attachment to parents and peers. By experiencing anxious feelings, shy children often prefer to avoid social interactions with peers by limiting their socialization opportunities [24,70]. Consistent with this study’s hypothesis, levels of shyness as measured by the CSQ-it, were associated with the Alienation factor of the IPPA-Peers, emphasizing how secure attachment bonds are connected to greater trust in others, more satisfying interpersonal relationships, and greater peer acceptance [71]. This confirms the difficulty that shy children experience in creating and maintaining relationships with their peers [72]. Similarly, Crozier’s studies [73,74] of the link between shyness and behavioral inhibition found that both shy children and adults are more reticent than their peers in social circumstances, consequently influencing acceptance by their peers. In turn, peer exclusion contributes to maintain or increase social withdrawal over time and to the manifestation and stabilization of shyness. Despite lack of empirical evidence, Booth-LaForce and Oxford [75] have argued that social isolation is linked to insecure attachment showing higher scores on the lack of security in inhibited children. Our results confirm that shy children report greater insecure attachment towards peers and demonstrate greater difficulty in communicating with and trusting peers, as well as higher social alienation.

These findings support the main research goals. However, the present study represents a preliminary step towards validating the CSQ among Italian schoolchildren. As future research, we are currently working on longitudinal study in which we will add future statistical validation adding the test-retest reliability of the CSQ-it.

Study 2: The moderating role of shyness in the link between somatic symptoms and internet addiction. A study of the discriminant validity of the CSQ-it

Shy children are more likely to develop cognitive and behavioral patterns that make them vulnerable to addiction to the internet, even if not all shy children use the internet in an excessive or risky way, and not all those who use the internet excessively experience somatic symptomatology. The aim of the second study is to test the hypothesis that shyness moderates the link between somatic symptoms and internet addiction and to explore the specific role of somatic symptoms in the association between shyness and internet addiction, hypothesizing a mediating effect.

In moderation analyses, the interaction between variables occur when the effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable varies across levels of a moderating variable. Specifically, in the present study somatic symptoms represent the independent variable, internet addiction is the dependent variable and shyness is defined as moderating variable. This model is chosen in order to explore the role of shyness in the association between the presence of a somatic symptomatology and addiction to the internet among adolescents.

Mediation analyses were carry out for testing hypothetical processes and mechanisms through which an independent variable might have an indirect effect over a dependent outcome variable through a mediators. A mediational analysis was conducted to examine the direct effect of shyness on internet addiction, and its indirect effect through somatic symptoms as measured by the CSI-24 on addiction to the internet.

Method

Participants

The study involved a sample of 131 schoolchildren attending the first grade of an Italian school (Males N = 64, 48.9%; and Females N = 67, 51.1%). Participants ranged in age from 10 to 15 years (M = 12.50; SD = 0.99). Twenty-one participants provided more than 10% of missing values and therefore, were excluded from the analysis. The final sample therefore comprised 110 schoolchildren with an average age of M = 12.17 (SD = 0.98; Males N = 54, 49.1%). All participants were Caucasian.

Procedure

A written informed consent was obtained from all schoolchildren and their parents before their enrolment in the study. All participants included in the final sample (N = 110) completed the entire questionnaire battery that was administrated in the classroom during school time. The collective administration took approximately 20–30 minutes. Anonymity of participants was ensured. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome.

Measures

Shyness.

The Italian version of the Children’s Shyness Questionnaire (CSQ) [44] was used to assess shyness the participants. In this study the Cronbach alpha was.72.

Somatic symptoms.

As in study 1, the Children’s Somatization Inventory-24 Child Version (CSI-24) [54,55] assessed children’s perceptions of somatic symptoms. In the current study Cronbach alpha was .81.

Internet addiction.

The Internet Addiction Test (IAT) [76] was designed to assess the use of the internet and the severity of symptoms of overuse among children and adolescents. The IAT is a self-report questionnaire consisting of 20 items rated on a six-point Likert scale (0 “Does not apply”; 1 “Rarely”; 2 “Occasionally”; 3 “Frequently”; 4 “Often” and 5 “Always”). The total score of the scale ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a greater level of addiction and problems caused by internet usage. Although researchers have used different cut-off points for internet addiction, a clinical or empirical cut-off for the IAT has yet to be validated [77]. In previous studies, the IAT has consistently demonstrated high reliability with adolescent samples (Cronbach’s α > .80) [78].In the current study Cronbach alpha was .86. For the purpose of the present study we used the average score of internet addiction.

Results

The mean Shyness score was 13.6 (SD = 7.89) with females (M = 15.5, SD = 8.54) scoring significantly (F(1,108) = 6.98, p < 0.01, η2 = 0.061) higher on average than males (M = 11.63, SD = 6.68). Considering the cut-off scores of Shyness, we identified 11 adolescents with Shyness scores greater than 1 SD above the mean. Turning to somatization, we found that approximately 50% of participants reported no somatic complaints, 12.7% reported only one symptom (n = 14), 20.1% reported two to four symptoms (n = 22), 16.5% complained of five to eight symptoms (n = 16) and 2.7% reported more than eight symptoms (n = 3). Considering internet addiction, the sample’s IAT score was M = 43.66 (SD = 12.21) with males scoring somewhat higher (M = 44.67; SD = 12.41) than females (M = 42.70, SD = 12.05), although the difference was not statistically significant (F(1,108) = 0.714, df = 1, p = 0.400, η2 = 0.006).

Correlational analyses showed a significant association between CSQ-it and gender (r = .246, p < 0.01), age (r = .245, p = 0.01) and CSI-24 (r = .296, p < .01). In addition, CSI-24 scores significantly correlated with the IAT scores (r = 0.275, p < 0.01).

Moderated mediation model

To test the hypothesis that the relationship between shyness and internet addiction is mediated by somatic symptoms and that shyness moderates the relationship between somatic symptoms and internet addiction we tested a moderated mediation model (Fig 1) using the macro PROCESS by Hayes [79].

Results suggested that shyness predicts an increase in somatic symptoms (β = 0.51, SE = .15, p < 0.01) and somatic symptoms predict an increase in internet addiction (β = .26, SE = .09, p < 0.01). However, shyness is not related to an increase in internet addiction (β = .03, p = 0.85) but the interaction between shyness and somatic symptoms is positively related to increased internet addiction scores (β = .03, SE = .01, p = .01). Also the index of moderated mediation was significant (index = .0148, boot-SE = .0056, bootstrap 95% C.I.: .0051: .0278). More importantly, the indirect effect is significantly moderated for high shyness scores (β = .26. boot-SE = .08, bootstrap 95% C.I: .1186; .4437) but not for low levels of shyness (β = .03, boot-SE = .08, bootstrap 95% C.I: -.0911; .2400). In summary, high levels of shyness are associated with somatic symptoms which subsequently are associated with increased risk of internet addiction.

Discussion

The aim of this second study was to explore the link between shyness, internalizing problems and internet addiction. Before testing the hypotheses underlying the study, the first step provided further evidence of the sound psychometric properties of the CSQ-it in terms of divergent validity in the Italian context. Second, the role of somatic symptoms in the relationship between shyness and internet addiction was investigated and the interaction between shyness and somatic symptoms was evaluated in predicting internet addiction.

Adolescence is a stage characterized by profound changes, both emotionally and behaviorally, in which the body plays a central role. Somatic symptomatology refers to physical symptoms whose genesis and evolution mainly depend on psychological factors. High levels of shyness, especially when they are associated with social withdrawal, can lead to loneliness and isolation, contributing to the manifestation of emotional and somatic problems [9]. The results presented here show a significant correlation between shyness and somatic symptoms. A possible explanation for this link might be that children with higher levels of shyness may experience greater inner discomfort related to social situations, in terms of anxiety and nervousness, and tend to express their discomfort through their body. It is well-documented that those who feel worried, anxious or tense, respond to external demands with the activation of reactions that may lead to pathological outcomes if the discomfort persists over time [80].

Several studies have explored the role of shyness in the expression of somatic symptomatology, but none has yet examined the relationship between these two constructs in the context of risk of internet addiction. Our findings are consistent with the study hypotheses. The analysis of the models of mediation and moderation indicates that, when the effect of somatic symptoms is controlled, there is a significant link between shyness and internet addiction. However, shyness alone does not predict internet addiction, since the direct path is not significant. In contrast, a significant indirect path supported the hypothesis of greater impaired adaptive functioning if shyness presents a somatic symptomatic picture.

During social interactions, children with high levels of shyness continually experience fear of making mistakes and dysfunctional thoughts, contributing to generating anxiety that may lead to a tendency to avoid potential threatening situations [81]. Therefore, in view of the problems shy children associate with a face-to-face relational context, their online interactions are worthy of investigation. In particular, the role of shyness in moderating the relationship between somatic symptoms and internet addiction was examined. Several studies have focused on how the use of the internet may improve an individual’s social relationships [82]. However, while the internet is one of the most accessible forms of media in the world, potential adverse effects are linked to its problematic use [49], particularly when it replaces “real life” with an online life [82].

The main risk is that the internet, rather than being one aspect of adolescent life, becomes the central part of an adolescent’s existence, with several repercussions in dealing with reality, including relational problems. These aspects assume an even greater value for individuals characterized by excessive levels of shyness, as confirmed by the present study wherein it was shown that higher levels of shyness are associated with an increase in the risk of developing an internet addiction. The internet assumes a compensatory function with respect to unsatisfactory relationships. Findings from this second study emphasize the role of shyness as a moderator. Several studies have investigated moderating variables between shyness and different aspects of mental health, such as eating disorders [83], depression [84], and somatic symptoms [11]. It is probable that in the presence of somatic symptomatology, shyness represents a risk factor for problematic internet use, in the sense that it significantly increases the likelihood that a person will experience a certain disorder in a short time and in a different way than when this factor is not present.

Conclusion

The primary goal of the studies presented here was to broaden our knowledge of shyness in an Italian sample by providing new empirical evidence about its measurement and its correlates.

Both studies demonstrate the reliability and validity of the CSQ-it, suggesting its value as a sensitive and appropriate instrument for the assessment of shyness during childhood and adolescence. The exploratory and confirmatory analyses confirm the good fit of the factorial structure of the questionnaire, allowing, at the same time, the validation of a single factor to define shyness within an Italian context. Furthermore, the analysis of the factorial structure and the psychometric properties of the CSQ-it indicate the possibility of effectively measuring internal states, such as shyness, through self-report questionnaires in school age children. These results provide evidence of the impact of shyness on psychosocial functioning and on the quality of meaningful relationships with parents and peers, as well as on the role that it plays in communication and social interactions.

However, our findings should be interpreted while keeping its limitations in mind. First, our sample consisted of healthy children, so it is not clear whether the results may be generalized to other populations (e.g., with chronic physical illnesses or pain). Second, this was a cross-sectional study and, consequently, the conclusions drawn should be considered with caution. In particular, cross-sectional studies do not provide the opportunity to demonstrate a temporal relationship, limiting the ability to infer causation. Only with longitudinal data will it be possible to establish a true cause and effect relationship and this is important for future research. Furthermore, we carried out a mediational analyses although the cross-sectional design to mediation can produce substantially biased estimates of longitudinal parameters even when the mediation is complete. Third, the Functional Disability Inventory was translated but not validated in Italian culture. Finally, our data were based on self-report measures rather than objective assessment, and susceptible to respondent bias.

References

  1. 1. Coplan RJ, Rubin KH. Social withdrawal and shyness in childhood. History, theories, definitions, and assessments. In Rubin KH, Coplan RJ (Eds.), The Development of Shyness and Social Withdrawal New York: The Guilford Press; 2010. pp. 3–20.
  2. 2. Biederman J, Hirshfeld-Becker DR, Rosenbaum JF, Hérot C, Friedman D, Snidman N. Further evidence of association between behavioral inhibition and social anxiety in children. The American Journal of Psychiatry 2001;158(10): 1673–1679. pmid:11579001
  3. 3. Schwartz CE, Snidman N, Kagan J. Adolescent social anxiety as an outcome of inhibited temperament in childhood. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 1999;38(8): 1008–15.
  4. 4. Henderson A, Pine DS, Fox NA. Behavioral inhibition and developmental risk: a dual-processing perspective. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015;40: 207–224. pmid:25065499
  5. 5. Essex MJ, Klein MH, Slattery MJ, Goldsmith HH, Kalin NH. Early risk factors and developmental pathways to chronic high inhibition and social anxiety disorder in adolescence. The American Journal of Psychiatry 2009;167(1): 40–46. pmid:19917594
  6. 6. Kagan J, Snidman N, Zentner M, Peterson E. Infant temperament and anxious symptoms in school age children. Development and Psychopathology 1999;11(2): 209–24. pmid:16506531
  7. 7. Stemberger RT, Turner SM, Beidel DC, Calhoun KS. Social phobia: An analysis of possible developmental factors. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1995;104(3): 526–531. pmid:7673576
  8. 8. Chung JYY, Evans MA. Shyness and symptoms of illness in young children. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 2000;32: 49–57.
  9. 9. Piko BF, Varga S, Mellor D. Are adolescents with high self-esteem protected from psychosomatic symptomatology? The European Journal of Pediatrics 2016;175(6): 785–192. pmid:26895878
  10. 10. Schmidt LA, Fox NA. Individual differences in young adults' shyness and sociability: Personality and health correlates. Personality and Individual Differences 1995;19: 455−462.
  11. 11. Henriksen RE, Murberg TA. Shyness as a risk-factor for somatic complaints among Norwegian adolescents. School Psychology International 2009;30: 148–162.
  12. 12. Hughes K, Coplan RJ. Exploring processes linking shyness and academic achievement in childhood. School Psychology Quarterly 2010;25: 213–222.
  13. 13. Cerutti R, Presaghi F, Spensieri V, Valastro C, Guidetti V. The potential impact of internet and mobile use on headache and other somatic symptoms in adolescence. A population-based cross-sectional study. Headache 2016;56(7): 1161–1170. pmid:27255862
  14. 14. Cerutti R, Spensieri V, Valastro C, Presaghi F, Canitano R, Guidetti V. A comprehensive approach to understand somatic symptoms and their impact on emotional and psychosocial functioning in children. PLoS One 2017;12(2): e0171867. pmid:28178333
  15. 15. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic; 1969.
  16. 16. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss: Separation, Anxiety, and Anger, vol. 2. New York: Basic Books; 1973.
  17. 17. Kennedy JH, Kennedy CE. Attachment theory: Implications for school psychology. Psychology in the Schools 2004;41(2): 247–259.
  18. 18. Kokkinos CM, Kakarani S, Kolovou D. Relationships among shyness, social competence, peer relations, and theory of mind among pre-adolescents. Social Psychology of Education 2016;19: 117–133.
  19. 19. Nachmias M, Gunnar M, Mangelsdorf S, Parritz RH, Buss K. Behavioral inhibition and stress reactivity: the moderating role of attachment security. Child Development 1996;67: 508–522. pmid:8625725
  20. 20. Spangler G, Schieche M. Emotional and adrenocortical responses of infants to the Strange situation: The differential function of emotional expression. International Journal of Behavioral Development 1998;22: 681–706.
  21. 21. Rubin KH, Chen X, McDougall P, Bowker A, McKinnon J. The Waterloo Longitudinal Project: Predicting adolescent internalizing and externalizing problems from early and mid-childhood. Development and Psychopathology 1995;7: 751–764.
  22. 22. Fordham K, Stevenson-Hinde J. Shyness, friendship quality, and adjustment during middle childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 1999;40(5): 757–768. pmid:10433409
  23. 23. Masi G, Mucci M, Favilla L, Brovedani P, Millepiedi S, Perugi G. Temperament in adolescents with anxiety and depressive disorders and in their families. Child Psychiatry & Human Development 2003;33(3): 245–259.
  24. 24. Chan SM. Depressive mood in Chinese early adolescents: Relations with shyness, self-esteem and perceived social support. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry 2012;4(4): 233–240.
  25. 25. Casale S, Fioravanti G. Psychosocial correlates of internet use among Italian students. International Journal of Psychology 2011; 46(4): 288–98. pmid:22044272
  26. 26. Park SK, Kim JY, Cho CB. Prevalence of internet addiction and correlations with family factors among South Korean adolescents. Adolescence 2008;43: 895–909. pmid:19149152
  27. 27. Spensieri V, Valastro C, Cerutti R. Technology addiction and alexithymia features in a sample of Italian adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(Suppl. 1) 2016; 1–64.
  28. 28. Beard KW, Wolf EM. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2001;4: 377–383.
  29. 29. Huan VS, Ang RP, Chong WH, Chye S. The impact of shyness on problematic internet use: The role of loneliness. The Journal of Psychology 2014;148(6): 699–715. pmid:25175891
  30. 30. Guidetti V, Cerutti R, Presaghi F, Spensieri V, Valastro C, Baglioni V. The effect of the virtual interactions on wellbeing in adolescence: Exploring the relationship between internet addiction, headache and depressive symptoms. Cephalalgia 2015;35(6S): 204–205.
  31. 31. Boccia Artieri G, Gemini L, Antonioni S. Comunicazione e luoghi del vissuto. Milano: Franco Angeli; 2004.
  32. 32. Edelmann RJ. The Psychology of Embarrassment. New York, NY: Wiley; 1987.
  33. 33. Alden LE, Wallace ST. Social phobia and social appraisal in successful and unsuccessful social interactions. Behaviour, Research and Therapy 1995;33: 497–505.
  34. 34. Roberts LD, Smith LM, Pollack CM. U r a lot bolder on the net. In Crozier W. R. (Ed.): Shyness: Development, Consolidation, and Change (pp. 121–138). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
  35. 35. Chak K, Leung L. Shyness and locus of control as predictors of internet addiction and internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2004;5: 559–570.
  36. 36. Kagan J, Snidman NC. The Long Shadow of Temperament. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2004.
  37. 37. Rubin KH. The Play Observation Scale (POS). Waterloo, Canada: University of Waterloo; 2001.
  38. 38. Coplan RJ, Arbeau KA, Armer A. Don’t fret, be supportive: Maternal characteristics linking child shyness to psychosocial and social adjustment in kindergarten. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2008; 36:359–371. pmid:17899358
  39. 39. Coplan RJ, Prakash K, O’Neil K, Armer M. Do you ‘want’ to play? Distinguishing between conflicted-shyness and social disinterest in early childhood. Developmental Psychology 2004; 4:244–258.
  40. 40. Rothbart MK, Ahadi SA. Temperament and the development of personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1994;103:55–66. pmid:8040481
  41. 41. Cheek JM, Buss AH. Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981; 41(2):330–339.
  42. 42. Bruch MA, Gorsky JM, Collins TM, Berger PA. Shyness and sociability reexamined: a multicomponent analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989; 57:904–915
  43. 43. Crozier WR. Measuring shyness: Analysis of the Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale. Personality and Individual Differences 2005; 38(81047–1056.
  44. 44. Crozier WR. Shyness and self-esteem in middle childhood. British Journal of Educational Psychology 1995;65: 85–95 pmid:7727270
  45. 45. Findlay LC, Coplan RJ, Bowker A. Keeping it all inside: Shyness, internalizing coping strategies and socio-emotional adjustment in middle childhood, International Journal of Behavioral Development 2009;33(1): 47–54.
  46. 46. Coplan RJ, Rose-Krasnor L, Weeks M, Kingsbury A, Bullock A. Alone is a crowd: Social motivations, social withdrawal, and socioemotional functioning in later childhood. Developmental Psychology 2013;49(5): 861–75. pmid:22686178
  47. 47. Spooner LM, Evans MA, Santos R. Hidden shyness in children: Discrepancies between self perceptions and the perceptions of parents and teachers. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 2005; 51(4): 437–466.
  48. 48. Ding X, Liu J, Coplan RJ, Chen X, Li D, Sang B. Self-reported shyness in Chinese children: Validation of the children's shyness questionnaire and exploration of its links with adjustment and the role of coping. Personality and Individual Differences 2014;68: 183–188.
  49. 49. Cerutti R, Spensieri V, Presaghi F, Valastro C, Fontana A, Guidetti V. An exploratory study on Internet addiction, somatic symptoms and emotional and behavioral functioning in school-aged adolescents. Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation 2017;14(6): 374–383.
  50. 50. Birmaher B, Khetarpal S, Brent D, Cully M, Balach L, Kaufman J, Neer SM. The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): scale construction and psychometric characteristics. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 1997;36: 545–553.
  51. 51. Ogliari A, Citterio A, Zanoni A, Fagnani C, Patriarca V, Cirrincione R, et al. Genetic and environmental influences on anxiety dimensions in Italian twins evaluated with the SCARED questionnaire. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 2006;20: 760–777. pmid:16326068
  52. 52. Scaini S, Ogliari A, De Carolis L, Bellodi L, Di Serio C, Brombin C. Evaluation of Mother-Child Agreement and Factorial Structures of the SCARED Questionnaire in an Italian Clinical Sample. Frontiers in psychology 2017;8: 242. pmid:28286488
  53. 53. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) 2000. Washington, D.C.: APA (trad. it.: DSM-IV-TR. Manuale diagnostico e statistico dei disturbi mentali, Text Revision. Milano: Masson, 2001).
  54. 54. Walker LS, Garber J, Greene JW. Somatization symptoms in pediatric abdominal pain patients: relation to chronicity of abdominal pain and parent somatization. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 1991;19: 379–394. pmid:1757708
  55. 55. Walker LS, Beck JE, Garber J, Lambert W. Children's Somatization Inventory: Psychometric Properties of the Revised Form (CSI-24). Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2009;34(4): 430–440. pmid:18782857
  56. 56. Walker LS, Greene JW. The Functional Disability Inventory: Measuring a neglected dimension of child health status. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 1991;16: 39–58. pmid:1826329
  57. 57. Armsden G, Greenberg MT The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Individual differences and their relation to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1987;16: 427–454. pmid:24277469
  58. 58. San Martini P, Zavattini GC, Ronconi S. L’inventario per l’attaccamento ai genitori ed ai pari (IPPA). Un’indagine psicometrica su un campione italiano di adolescenti. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 2009;36(1): 199–225.
  59. 59. Baiocco R, Laghi F, Paola R. Le scale IPPA per l’attaccamento nei confronti dei genitori e del gruppo dei pari in adolescenza: un contributo alla validazione italiana. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo 2009;13(2): 355–83.
  60. 60. Gullone E, Robinson K. The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment—Revised (IPPA-R) for Children: A Ppsychometric investigation. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 2005;12: 67–79.
  61. 61. Revelle W. psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, 2016. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychVersion=1.6.9.
  62. 62. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2015. URL https://www.R-project.org/
  63. 63. Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 2012;48(2): 1–36.
  64. 64. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1996;1(2): 130–149.
  65. 65. Zhang Z, Yuan KH. Practical Statistical Power Analysis Using Webpower and R. (Eds). Granger, IN: ISDSA Press; 2018.
  66. 66. Findlay LC, Coplan RJ. Come out and play: Shyness in childhood and the benefits of organized sports participation. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 2008;40: 153–161.
  67. 67. Sette S, Baumgartner E, Schneider BH. Shyness, child-teacher relationships, and socio-emotional adjustment in a sample of Italian preschool-aged children. Infant and Child Development 2014;23(3): 323–332.
  68. 68. Walker LS, Smith CA, Garber J, Claar RL. Testing a model of pain appraisal and coping in children with chronic abdominal pain. Health Psychology 2005;24: 364–374. pmid:16045372
  69. 69. Jones K, Schulkin J, Schmidt L. Shyness: Subtypes, psychosocial correlates, and treatment interventions. Psychology 2014;5: 244–254.
  70. 70. Rubin KH, Burgess K. Parents of aggressive and withdrawn children. In: Bornstein M, editor. Handbook of parenting. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002. pp. 383–418.
  71. 71. Larose S, Bernier A. Social support processes: Mediators of attachment state of mind and adjustment in late adolescence. Attachment and Human Development 2001;3: 96–120. pmid:11708386
  72. 72. Kingsbury M, Coplan RJ, Rose-Krasnor L. Shy but getting by? An examination of the complex links among shyness, coping, and socioemotional functioning in childhood. Social Development 2013;22(1): 126–145.
  73. 73. Crozier WR. Shyness: Development, Consolidation, and Change. London: Routledge; 2001.
  74. 74. Crozier WR. Blushing, shame and social anxiety, in Gilbert P & Miles J (Eds) Body Shame: Conceptualisation, Research and Treatment. London: Brunner-Routledge; 2002. pp. 205–218.
  75. 75. Booth-LaForce C, Oxford LM. Trajectories of social withdrawal from grades 1 to 6: Prediction from early parenting, attachment, and temperament. Developmental Psychology 2008;44: 1298–1313. pmid:18793064
  76. 76. Young KS. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior 1998;1(3): 237–244.
  77. 77. Pontes HM, Patrão IM, Griffiths MD. Portuguese validation of the Internet Addiction Test: An empirical study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 2014; 3(2): 107–14. pmid:25215221
  78. 78. Wang H, Zhou X, Lu C, Wu J, Deng X, Hong L. Problematic Internet use in high school students in Guangdong province, China. PloS One 2011;6(5): e19660. pmid:21573073
  79. 79. Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York,: The Guilford Press; 2013.
  80. 80. Ursin H, Eriksen HR. The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2004;29(5): 567–592. pmid:15041082
  81. 81. De Acutis S, Cerutti R, Guidetti V. La timidezza e la fobia sociale in età evolutiva: fattori di rischio e di sviluppo. Psichiatria dell'infanzia e dell'adolescenza 2009;76(3): 608–621.
  82. 82. Di Lorenzo M, Lancini M, Suttora C, Zanella TE. La dipendenza da internet in adolescenza tra normalità e psicopatologia: uno studio italiano. Psichiatria e Psicoterapia 2013;32(2): 101–134.
  83. 83. Miller JL, Schmidt LA, Vaillancourt T. Shyness, sociability, and eating problems in a non-clinical sample of female undergraduates. Eating Behaviors 2008;9: 352–359. pmid:18549995
  84. 84. Bell IR, Jasnoski ML, Kagan J, King DS. Is allergic rhinitis more frequent in young adults with extreme shyness? A preliminary survey. Psychosomatic Medicine 1990;52: 517–525. pmid:2247557