Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Physiological and transcriptomic analyses reveal the molecular networks of responses induced by exogenous trehalose in plant

  • Yongchun Shi,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    ⨯
  • Hui Sun,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation

    Affiliation College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    ⨯
  • Xiaoran Wang,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    ⨯
  • Weihuan Jin,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    ⨯
  • Qianyi Chen,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation

    Affiliation College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    ⨯
  • Zhengdong Yuan,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    ⨯
  • Haidong Yu

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    hdy001@126.com

    Affiliation College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    ⨯

Abstract

It is well known that exogenous trehalose can improve resistances of plants to some abiotic and biotic stresses. Nonetheless, information respecting the molecular responses of tobacco leaves to Tre treatment is limited. Here we show that exogenous Tre can rapidly reduce stomatal aperture, up-regulate NADPH oxidase genes and increase O2•-andH2O2 on tobacco leaves at 2 h after treatment. We further demonstrated that imidazole and DPI, inhibitors of NADPH oxidase, can promote recovery of stomatal aperture of tobacco leaves upon trehalose treatment. Exogenous trehalose increased tobacco leaf resistance to tobacco mosaic disease significantly in a concentration-dependent way. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms in response to exogenous trehalose, the transcriptomic responses of tobacco leaves with 10 (low concentration) or 50 (high concentration) mM of trehalose treatment at 2 or 24h were investigated through RNA-seq approach. In total, 1288 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found with different conditions of trehalose treatments relative to control. Among them, 1075 (83.5%) were triggered by low concentration of trehalose (10mM), indicating that low concentration of Tre is a better elicitor. Functional annotations with KEGG pathway analysis revealed that the DEGs are involved in metabolic pathway, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, plant hormone signal transduction, plant-pathogen interaction, protein processing in ER, flavonoid synthesis and circadian rhythm and so on. The protein-protein interaction networks generated from the core DEGs regulated by all conditions strikingly revealed that eight proteins, including ClpB1, HSP70, DnaJB1-like protein, universal stress protein (USP) A-like protein, two FTSH6 proteins, GolS1-like protein and chloroplastics HSP, play a core role in responses to exogenous trehalose in tobacco leaves. Our data suggest that trehalose triggers a signal transduction pathway which involves calcium and ROS-mediated signalings. These core components could lead to partial resistance or tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses. Moreover, 19 DEGs were chosen for analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The qRT-PCR for the 19 candidate genes coincided with the DEGs identified via the RNA-seq analysis, sustaining the reliability of our RNA-seq data.

Citation: Shi Y, Sun H, Wang X, Jin W, Chen Q, Yuan Z, et al. (2019) Physiological and transcriptomic analyses reveal the molecular networks of responses induced by exogenous trehalose in plant. PLoS ONE 14(5): e0217204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204

Editor: Diane C. Bassham, Iowa State University, UNITED STATES

Received: January 25, 2019; Accepted: May 7, 2019; Published: May 22, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Shi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: HY received the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871368), which website is http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. None of the research costs or authors' salaries have been funded in whole or in part by a tobacco company.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Trehalose (Tre), as a non-reducing disaccharide, is formed by two α-glucose units linked through α, α-1,1-glucosidic bond (α-D-glucopyranosyl-[1,1]-α-D-glucopyranoside). Tre biosynthesis and signaling in vivo have been investigated extensively in many different organisms, including bacteria, yeast, fungi, insects, plants and animals[1, 2]. Even though alternative pathways exist in different organisms, biosynthesis of Tre typically includes two steps. Trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (TPS) first catalyses the formation of trehalose-6-phosphate (T6P) from UDP-glucose and glucose-6-P, and trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase (TPP) further convert T6P into Tre[3]. In vivo, Tre has been reported to protect the integrity of organelles and cells in some organisms against enviromental stresses[4–6]. T6P, as an intermediate metabolite of Tre biosynthesis, has been proved to function as a sensor for in vivo available sucrose, by this means regulating the responses of organism to the diverse environmental changes directly, which is reasonable as the components of Tre biosynthesis pathway, such as T6P, trehalose and their biosynthetic enzymes are part of an interactive correlation network including sugar and hormone signaling pathways, etc[7]. In plants, the components of Tre biosynthesis pathway not only influence growth and development, but also get involved in responses of both abiotic and biotic stresses[7–9]. Over-expressing yeast TPS1 and TPS2 in Arabidopsis can increase the resistances of the transgenic lines to abiotic stresses, including freezing, drought, salt and heat stress[10]. The TPS1 transformants of sorghum exhibited tolerance to salt stress as well as higher root growth and biomass[11]. In rice, over-expression of OsTPP1 confers rice tolerance to both salt and cold stresses[12], and OsTPP7 was found as the genetic determinant in a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) for an aerobic germination tolerance[13]. Tre accumulated in Tripogonloliiformis can regulate autophagy that might further confer the plant desiccation tolerance[14].

Tre is one of naturally occurring substances produced by organisms, which is nontoxic to the environment. It showed elicitor and priming properties, and improved protection in plants against abiotic and biotic stresses.In wheat, exogenous Tre increases the resistance to the biotic stress caused by powdery mildew[15, 16]. In rice seedlings, Tre pretreatment is involved in protection against salt-induced oxidative damage through significantly enhanced level of antioxidant activity[17], and also elevated the endogenous Tre level and significantly withstood the toxicities of excessive copper on plant photosynthesis and development[18]. Under drought stress, a significant correlation has been found between exogenous application of Tre and drought tolerance, and foliar spray of Tre was the best way in improving antioxidant defense system in Raphanus sativus L. (radish) plants[19, 20]. A couple of studies have been done to investigate gene expression patterns in response to Tre treatment in Arabidopsis seedling cultured in liquid medium by DNA microarray[21, 22]. In tobacco, interestingly, exogenous Tre can effectively increase nitrogen metabolism, and promote tobacco growth under deficient nitrogen that restrict plant growth severely[23].

N. tabacum is the chief commercial crop among more than 70 species of tobacco known. Tobacco mosaic disease (TMV) is one of the major diseases of flue-cured tobacco. Studies have shown that pretreatment with exogenous Tre can enhance plant's tolerance to both abiotic and biotic stresses. However, whether Tre can enhance tobacco resistance to TMV has not yet been documented. In the present study, we found that exogenous Tre can enhance resistance of tobacco leaves to TMV in a concentration dependent way. To elucidate the molecular mechanism of the tobacco leaf in response to exogenous Tre treatment, firstly, the best concentrations and time-points of exogenous Tre treatment were determined by measuring a series of physiological responses of tobacco leaves to exogenous Tre, and combined with the resistant efficiency of tobacco to TMV affected by the different concentrations of Tre; secondly, the transcriptomic responses of tobacco treated with Tre were investigated using RNA-seq analysis. Our research provides a critical basis for understanding the precise mechanisms that occur in leaf tissues of the commercial crop N. tabacum in response to exogenous Tre treatment.

Materials and methods

Plant material, treatment with exogeneous Tre and inoculation with TMV

Tobacco seeds (Nicotiana tabaccum cv. k326 and Nicotiana glutinosa. L.) were germinated in petri dishes moistened filter paper. After 10 days, seedlings were transferred in compost (Petersfield Products, Leicester, UK) with no any other fertilizers in plastic pots (4 × 4 × 5 cm); 4–5 weeks later, plants were transferred to bigger plastic pots (diameter 20 cm; height 20 cm) containing the same compost. All plants used in this study were grown in a constant temperature greenhouse at 24°C with > 70% ambient humidity and 16 h light daily. Average photosynthetic photon flux density of 300μmol (photon) m−2 s−1 at the height of leaves employed for experiments. Tre treatment was tested for its activity of increasing N. glutinosa resistance against TMV using the half-leaf method (Necrotic local lesion assay in tobacco leaves by means of half leaves). Tre solutions (Amresco, USA) of 10 and 50 mM were freshly prepared before use in distillated water added with 0.025% (v/v) Citowett, a wetting agent, whereas the corresponding control contained distillated water with 0.025% (v/v) Citowett only. When tobacco had eight fully expanded true leaves healthily at the 8 leaves stage, leaves of the same age on different plants were selected for Tre treatment, usually they were the sixth and the seventh. Half of the whole leaf on both adaxial and abaxial surface was smeared 1 ml of distillated water as a control, and the other half was done with 1 ml of 10 mM or 50 mM Tre, respectively. For inoculation of TMV, the adaxial surface of each leaf was gently rubbed with 100μl of TMV in 10mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at concentration of 10 μg/ml and Carborundum (silicon carbite) at 24h after Tre pretreatments. Numbers of local lesions on each half leaf were noted at 4 days after TMV inoculation. Fifteen replicates were performed for each Tre treatment and control. The rate of inhibition was calculated in accordance to the formula as follow:

Statistical data

To compare values from the raw data-number of lesions on each leaf infected by TMV and stomatal apertures of tobacco leaves treated with different concentration Tre, ANOVA was performed with the statistical software DPS Data Processing System software V15.10 [24]. The Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) (P< 0.05) method was used to discriminate among the means.

Histochemical detection of O2•- and H2O2 accumulation in tobacco leaf

The histochemical detection of H2O2 and O2•-in tobacco leaf was performedaccording to Hernandez et al. [25] with minor modifications. NBT staining was used to detect in situ the production of O2•-. 25 mM K-HEPES [4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonicacid] buffer (pH 7.6) containing 0.1 mg mL-1 NBT was infiltrated into tobacco leaves directly by a vaccum, and incubated for 2 h at 25°C in the dark. Tobacco leaf was then rinsed for 10 min with 80% (v/v) alcohol at 70°C, and subsequently mounted in lactic acid/phenol/water [1:1:1, (v/v)] to eliminate the chlorophyllcompletely, andphotographed directly using camera.

In the case of H2O2, DAB (3,3ʹ-Diaminobenzidine) stainingwas used to detect in situ the production of H2O2. 50 mm Tris-acetate buffer (pH 5.0) containing 0.1 mg/mlDAB was infiltrated intotobacco leavesas above that were immersed into the same buffer for 24 h in the dark at 25°C. Controls were carried out and immersedinto the presence of 10 mm ascorbic acid.

RNA-seq library preparation and illumina sequencing

Tobacco total RNAs from the leaf samples with Tre pretreatment were extracted using RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Gemany) as stated in the manufacturer’s protocol. Firstly, RNA integrity and contamination was assessedin 1.0% agarose gel by electrophoresis. Further,the quality and concentration ofeach RNA sample were analyzedtaking advantage of an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. The NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, USA) was used for generation of sequencing librariesaccording to manufacturer’s recommendations, and the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system was used fordetermination of library quality, which were then sequenced to generate 150 bp paired-end reads by 1 Gene Co. Ltd, Hangzhou, China using the Illumina HiSeq 4000 Platform.

Functional annotation and enrichment pathway analysis of DEGs

In order to conduct the analysis of the raw RNA-Seq data, clean data (clean reads) were obtained by removing low quality reads (reads containing >20% of bases having Q value ≤15 or an ambiguous sequence content (ploy-N) more than 5% from raw data) by Trimmomatic (v0.30) [26]. The reference of tobacco genome and annotation files of gene model was obtained from the tobacco genome website to process the clean data with high quality (ftp://ftp.solgenomics.net/genomes/Nicotiana_tabacum/). Index of the reference genome was built using Bowtie2 (2.3.0) [27], and subsequently, the reads were blasted to the reference genome of tobacco using TopHat2 [28].

The gene transcript abundance in all 12 samples was calculated as fragments per kilo bases per million reads (FPKM) values[29]. The genes with FPKM<1 were filtered out before subsequent analysis. Differential expression of two conditions was analyzed using DESeq [30] that supplies statistical principles for assessing differential expression in RNA-seq data based on the negative binomial distribution. The Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P values were used for controlling the false discovery rate (FDR). Gene with a very stringent cutoff, an adjusted FDR <0.05 and |log2Ratio|≥1 identified by DESeq, was classified as differentially expressed.

The Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analyses of DEGs were performed using the topGO R package with an adjusted P-valueless less than 0.05 (http://www.geneontology.org/). EdgeR package was used for testing the statistical enrichment of DEGs in KEGG pathways (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/).

qRT-PCR analysis for the DEGs

Tobacco total RNAs from leaf tissues sampledafter exogenous Trepretreatment were extracted using the RNAiso Plus kit with DNase I (Takara, Japan). First-strand cDNA was generated withthe oligo (dT) prime using the PrimeScript OneStep RT-PCR Kit Ver. 2 (Takara, RR055A). qRT-PCR experiment was performed usingthe CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA) with the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix kit (PE-Applied Biosystems, USA).

Results

Pretreatment with exogenous Tre enhances resistance of tobacco leaf to TMV infection significantly

In this study, we took advantage of the half-leaf method to determine the optimal Tre concentration against TMV, We found were that both of 10 and 50 mM of Tre treatment before TMV infection can enhance resistance of tobacco to TMV infection significantly in the light of the numbers of local lesions on the leaves of N. glutinosa (Table 1 and S1 Data). The inhibition rates from 10 and 50 mM of Tre pretreatments against TMV were 17.1% and 36.23%, respectively, which are positively correlated with the concentration of exogenous Tre. Tre treatment during and after TMV infection also showed protection effects, butwas less efficient than a treatment before infection based on our preliminary results (data not shown).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Protection of trehalose against TMV.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.t001

The exogenous Tre as an effective elicitor increases superoxide anion (O2•-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), reduces stomata aperture and activates the expression of rbohD/rbohF

Combined with the effect of Tre concentration on inhibition rate of TMV infection, a series of physiological phenotypes of tobacco leaves in response to exogenous Tre were characterized to identify the optimal time-points of Tre treatment for RNA-seq library construction. The sixth and seventh fully expanded true leaves of N. tabaccum at the 8 leaves stage were smeared with 2 ml of 0 (as a control), 10 and 50 mM of Tre on both sides, respectively, and the ROS species, O2•- and H2O2, were monitored at 2h and 24 h after pretreatment separately as described in methods. NBT staining and DAB staining indicated that the production of both H2O2 and O2•-were significantly increased in tobacco leaves at 2 and 24 h after Tre treatment (Fig 1A). The stomatal aperture was also measured at 2h after the treatments with 0, 10, 30, and 50 mM Tre, respectively. After Tre treatment, the stomatal aperture of tobacco decreased significantly, and the percentage decreases were 23.9%, 30.9% and 33.4%, respectively (Fig 1B).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. ROS content, stomatal aperture and enzyme expression profiles of tobacco leaves in response to exogenous trehalose.

(A)Both superoxide ion (O•-2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were induced significantly at 2h and 24h after trehalose treatment; The effect of trehalose on stomatal aperture without (B) (n = 48) or with (C) (n≥22) CAT, imidazole and DPI;(D) The effect of trehalose on the transcript level of rbohD and rbohF.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.g001

NADPH oxidases are generally membrane bound, and also named as respiratory burst oxidase homologues (RBOHs) that catalyze the reduction of molecular oxygen into O2•- by transferring an electron, wherein NADPH acts as an electron donor and are the biological ROS factory and play a key role in the production of ROS in response to both abiotic and biotic stress in plants[31–33]. Based on that, some of the tobacco RBOHs might be activated by exogenous Tre, which is likely to be due to the induction of the stomata movement and the production of ROS in tobacco leaf. To test whether the tobacco RBOHs are involved in that procedure, we treated the tobacco leaves with 50 mM Tre combined with catalase (CAT) (Sigma-Aldrich, cat#: C9322), imidazole and DPI, respectively, as shown in Fig 1C. CAT is a catalase that clears H2O2 from cells. Imidazole and DPI, as inhibitor of NADPH oxidase, can bind to cytochrome B and flavoprotein in NADPH oxidase to hamper ROS production. Exogenous CAT treatment had little effect on Tre-induced reduction of stomatal aperture, while imidazole and DPI treatment blocked Tre-induced stomatal closure and returned to control levels of 95.02% and 94.52%, respectively (Fig 1C). In N. tabacum, three members of NADPH oxidases/RBOHs have been reported, and NtrbohD and NtrbohF are responsible for ROS production[34–36]. The expression profiles of NtrbohD and NtrbohF in response to exogenous Tre were determined by qRT-PCR. NtrbohD was up-regulated only by the treatment of 10 mM Tre at 2 and 24h significantly, however, NtrbohF was up-regulated in all the four conditions (10T2h, 50T2h, 10T24h and 50T24h) (Fig 1D).

Sequencing overview and transcript identification

To investigate the molecular mechanism of the elicitor effect of exogenous Tre,cDNA samples were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform. According to the resistance of tobacco leaves with Tre treatment to TMV infection and the physiological phenotypes above, the leaves treated with 10 (low concentration) and 50 (high concentration) mM of Tre were collected at two time-points, 2 (early stage) and 24h (late stage) for RNA-seq analysis with two replicates with a total of 12 samples, including controls and four different conditions/groups (combinations of two concentrations and two time-points). To simplify the description, we designated each two replicates of the tobacco leaves with 0 (control), 10 and 50 mM of T treatment for 2h or 24h as CT2h-R1 and -R2, CT24h-R1 and -R2, 10T2h-R1 and -R2, 50T2h-R1 and -R2, 10T24h-R1 and -R2, and 50T24h-R1 and -R2, respectively. Therefore, the four conditions/groups are named as 10T2h, 50T2h, 10T24h and 50T24h, respectively.

Sequencing results showed that more than 45 million reads for each sample were generatedfrom the 12 tobacco RNA libraries after the Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencing (Table 2). Low-quality rRNA reads and adapters were removed, leading to theratio ofclean readsmore than 91% for each sample, which denotes that we had the sufficient sequencing depth for the transcriptome coverage in tobacco (Table 2). Observed percentages of reads mapped to the N.tabaccum genome per library were 79.4, 81.0, 86.1, 86.0, 86.2, 90.1, 82.6, 86.7, 85.7, 87.4, 83.6and 87.2%,respectively(Table 2), implying the RNA-seq data are sufficient and reliable for following analysis of bioinformatics.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Summary of reads mapped to the N.tabaccum genome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.t002

DEGs responding to exogenous Tre and qRT-PCR validation

As shown in Table 3, in the four comparisons of 10T2hvs C2h, 50T2hvs C2h, 10T24h vs C24h and 50T24hvsC24h, there were 242, 102, 833 and 111 DEGs indentified by DESeq, respectively. The maximum number of DEGs was in 10T24h vs C24h, which indicates low concentration of T (10mM) at late stage (24h) triggers more DEGs than the other three conditions. 110, 64, 579 and 56 were up-regulated, while 132, 38, 254 and 55 were down-regulated in the 10T2hvs C2h, 50T2hvs C2h, 10T24hvs C24h and 50T24h, respectively (Table 3).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. The DEGs in tobacco leaves responding to trehalose compared with control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.t003

To experimentally confirm that the DEGs obtained in this study were credible, expression profile of 19 selected DEGs, 2 (FSH and HSP21) of them up-regulated in all the four groups, were analyzed via qRT-PCR (Fig 2). The tobacco Actin2 (GenBank accession No.EU938079.1) was chosen as a reference gene for qRT-PCRassay, and the2-ΔΔCT method was used for calculation of relative expression levels of DEGs that were normalized to reference gene Actin2 [37]. Three biological samples were prepared for each condition, and six conditions were included in Table 3. Three whole leaves except for main veins were collected as one independent biological sample. Two technical replicates for each sample were used for each DEG selected. The qPCR-RT results showed that the expression profiles of the DEGs selected were in line with those obtained from the Illumina sequencing analysis. As shown in Fig 2, comparison of qRT-PCR results with RNA-seq data showed high correlations (R2≥0.792 for each condition/group), confirming accountable RNA-seq analysis in the present study. These results indicated that the method used to determine DEGs in this study were valid. The primers used in qRT-PCR analysis were shown in S2 Data.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. qRT-PCR validation of the DEGs selected from the four conditions (10T2h, 50T2h, 10T24h and 50T24h).

The expression profiles were compared with the corresponding DEGs in RNA-seq data (R2 = 0.792, R2 = 0.873, R2 = 0.917, R2 = 0.871), respectively. R represents correlation coefficient.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.g002

A total of 1288 DEGs from all four conditions were further assorted by Venn analysis (Fig 3 and S3–S6 Data). The Numbers indicate unique and common DEGs for the different comparisons in the Venn diagram. From it, what we found was Tre affected the gene expressions of tobacco leaves in both a concentration-dependent manner and a time-specific manner. 929 (in response to 10 mM Tre) and 96 (in response to 50 mM Tre) DEGs regulated by effect of Tre concentration uniquely were confirmed, respectively (Fig 3, S7 and S8 Data), indicating that low concentration of Tre (10 mM) triggered much more genes expressed differentially than high concentration of Tre (50 mM) at both 2h and 24 h, and that was a much broader and more expensive response to 10 mM Tre. 160 unique DEGs were in 10T2h. Among them, 62 were up-regulated, and 98 were down-regulated. The majority of the DEGs regulated by 10 mM Tre were from 10T24h. Among them, 539 were up-regulated, while 215 were down-regulated. The DEGs also exhibited a time-specific expression pattern, a shift of numbers of DEGs from 2h to 24h was observed. Therefore, we compared and analyzed the DEGs in these two aspects.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Venn diagram of the DEGs in different comparisons from the four conditions including 10T2h, 10T24h, 50T2h and 50T24h.

The Numbers (Red: up-regulated genes; Black: down-regulated genes) indicate unique and common DEGs for the different comparisons.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.g003

Functional classifications of the DEGs in response to Tre in a concentration-dependent manner by GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis

To uncover the similarities and differences of biological procedures in Tre-responsive transcriptomes between controls and the four different conditions, the 1288 DEGs from all four conditions were annotated and mapped to GO term and KEGG database, respectively. The Tre concentration comparison was performed in terms of the low (10mM) to high (50mM) concentration of Tre. Based on sequence homology, they were assigned to three ontologies of biological process (BP), cellular component (CC) and molecular function (MF) (Fig 4; S7 and S8 Data). The significant GO terms were very similar between the DEGs triggered by 10 mM Tre and 50 mM of Tre, and were mostly enriched in metabolic process, cellular process, single-organism process, and respond to stimulus in the ontology of BP. Most of the DEGs in the CC category were assigned to cell, cell part, membrane, organelle and membrane part. The top three GO terms in the MF category were catalytic activity, binding and transporter activity. The corresponding genes of these significant terms, therefore, might play important roles in response to abiotic and biotic stresses.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. The comparison of the GO terms for the DEGs triggered by 10 mM and 50 mM of trehalose, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.g004

The DEGs from 10 mM and 50 mM of Tre treatment also had similar pattern in KEGG analysis. The 1288 total identified DEGs were assigned to 78 KEGG pathways (Fig 5, S7 and S8 Data) that were represented in Fig 5, and were largely enriched in biotic and abiotic stresses belong to metabolic pathway, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, plant hormone signal transduction, plant-pathogen interaction, starch and sucrose metabolism, protein processing in ER, flavonoid biosynthesis, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and pentose and glucuronate interconversion, etc. These results indicate that exogenous Tre can trigger a lot of stress-related genes in tobacco leaves, which might be involved in partial resistance to TMV. However, the amount of the DEGs in response to low concentration of Tre (10mM) were much more than those regulated by high concentration of Tre (50mM), their patterns were similar in different pathways though. For example, 173 DEGs triggered by 10 mM of Tre were enriched in metabolic pathway, in contrast, only 26 DEGs regulated by 50 mM of Tre treatment were found in the same pathway. However, in protein processing in ER, the amount (29) of DEGs triggered by 10 mM of Tre was similar to those (22) triggered by 50 mM of Tre. The overlap between them included 9 genes that were all increased in response to both of 10 and 50 mM of Tre treatment and encode heat shock proteins (Fig 5, S7 and S8 Data), which suggests that the concentration of exogenous Tre has a strong effect to the gene expression profiles of tobacco leaves.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. The Comparison of KEGG classification for the DEGs regulated by 10 mM and 50 mM of trehalose, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.g005

DEGs independent of Tre concentration in tobacco leaves relative to time-specific expression pattern

We further compared the differences and similarities of DEGs during the progression of Tre treatment as they might show the putative roles involved in resistance or susceptibility to abiotic and biotic stresses. At early time point (2h), 49 genes respond to Tre treatments free from effect of Tre concentration, in which 31 were up-regulated and 18 were down-regulated, respectively. At the later time point (24h), 35 genes respond to Tre treatments independent of effect of Tre concentration, where 12 were increased and 23 were decreased, respectively (Fig 3). Among these genes, 8 genes, named as core components in response to exogenous Tre, exhibited regulatory responses to all the four conditions, and were all up-regulated, including four heat shock protein (HSPs) genes (HSP101, HSP90, HSP70T-2 and HSP21), two FTHS6s, one GolS1and one universal stress protein (USP) gene (S9 Data).

To elucidate the complex interaction of the differentially expressed proteins independent of effect of Tre concentration at each time point, the TAIR Arabidopsis gene codes of the DEGs were obtained via BLASTx (S10 and S11 Data), and subsequently imputed into STRING tool (www.string-db.org) to view protein-protein interaction networks (PPINs). The network of time point 2h indicates that Tre triggered a heat shock-like response at early stage (Fig 6A). Majority (31/49) of the DEGs were increased significantly, including the 8 core DEGs (S9 Data). Many of them, such as APX2, GolS1, HSPs, etc., are the targets of some key HSFs, like HSFA1 and HSFA2. HSFA2 might be responsible for their activations in tobacco leaves with Tre treatment since it has been reported that the peak of HSFA2 expression is around 0.5-1h under heat stress [38, 39], which can explain HSFA2 was not up-regulated significantly at 2h after Tre treatment in our RNA-seq data. In addition, jasmonate signaling pathway involved plant defense and diverse developmental pathways was clustered in PPIN of the 2h stage (Fig 6A), suggesting that Tre treatment can activate the pathway at early stage effectively. Down-regulation of JasmonateZim-domain protein 1(JAZ1) were observed at 2h stage in both conditions of 10T2h and 50T2h. JAZ proteins as transcription repressors bind to promoter regions of jasmonate-inducible genes to block their expression [40].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 6. STRING network of trehalose-responsive genes at each time point (2h and 24h).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.g006

In the network of time point 24h (Fig 6B and S10 Data), HSFB2B with some HSPs/chaperones were clustered. HSFB2B represses the transcription of heat shock response genes under normal temperature conditions. In contrast, under heat stress conditions, it is required for the transcription of heat stress-inducibleHSP genes that are indispensable for acquired thermo-tolerance [41]. The expression of HSFB2B is necessary to attenuate harmful effect of abiotic stress on the circadian system [42], and it is also involved in resistance to biotic stress in Arabidopsis [43]. Therefore, the DEGs from the RNA-seq data constructed a strong connection between exogenous Tre and the signal pathways of both abiotic and biotic stresses.

Discussion

Pretreating crops with natural isolated elicitors in the absence of pathogens can enhance plant resistance to diseases. Up to now, diverse elicitors are available from organisms such as bacteria, fungus, oomycete and plants. Nonetheless, different elicitor usually does not trigger same plant response. Therefore, their molecular networks need to be elucidated prior to the application of elicitor for good agriculture practice. Tre is a non-toxic disaccharide synthesized by organisms such as some bacteria, fungi, plants and invertebrate animals, and is a good candidate of elicitor against environmental stresses, especially plant diseases, as it has been more affordable and accessible due to its chemical synthesis and, when applied exogenously, is readily absorbed by plants [44]. Evidences showed that exogenous Tre reduced stomata aperture through a H2O2-dependent pathway [45, 46], and stomata movement in response to abiotic and biotic stress are regulated by redox-dependent signaling [47, 48]. It has been used as a tool to enhance plant resistances to some of abiotic and biotic stresses that affect plant growth and yield. However, exogenous Tre is more or less toxic to plant development. In Arabidopsis, 100 mM of exogenous Tre treatment results in strong inhibition of seedling growth. T6P rapidly accumulating in cytosol might mediate the signal transduction pathways of growth inhibition caused by Tre [49], which enhances starch biosynthesis and triggers redox activation of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) gene in source tissues[50]. Microarray analysis shown that Arabidopsis seedlings treated with 30 mM of had many changes on its transcripts related to metabolism, abiotic and biotic stresses, and root elongation was also inhibited significantly [21]. However, low millimolar concentrations of exogenous Tre can attenuate impairment of salt stress to Arabidopsis [51] and Catharanthus [52] through regulation of ionic balance, cellular redox state, cell death, and osmotic adjustment. During the process, Tre toxicity to plant was counteracted by impairment of salt stress. Furthermore, in tobacco, at low concentration (e.g. 8 mM), exogenous Tre can recover the nitrate reductase activity partially, and chlorophyll and total nitrogen content of leaves and rates of photosynthesis were increased through a long-term effect, which can be observed 1–2 weeks after the treatments [23]. In stark contrast, we did not find the expression level of any nitrate reductase genes were changed in our RNA-seq data (S7 and S8 Data). One possibility is we only focused on the molecular mechanism occurring early (in 24 h) and without any environmental stresses; and nitrate reductase genes are uniquely affected by Tre under limiting nitrogen condition. The interesting differences between our present research and Lin et al’s work [23] suggest that there might be some other mechanisms of plant responding to exogenous Tre treatment, such as performing the treatments during or after environmental stresses.Similar to this, in the present study, high concentration of Tre (50 mM) induced less number of DEGs, but showed a better protection against TMV. One possibility is, as a natural chemical compound, high concentration of Tre might act mainly as a priming agent, but not an elicitor, which means Tre can act mainly as an elicitor or a priming agent in one species in a concentration-dependent way, because it has been reported one compound can function as an elicitor or a priming agent between different species [53].

Plant pathogen is perceived by plant surface pattern recognition receptors that detect conserved microbe-specific molecules referred as to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Flagellin insensitive 2 (FLS2), EF-Tu receptor (EFR) and chitin elicitor receptor kinase 1 (CERK1) are this sort of receptors that have been characterized recently referred as to pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) involved in the specific interaction with corresponding elicitors, respectively [54–56]. The three receptors, BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-ASSOCIATED KINASE1 (BAK1) and BAK1-LIKE1 (BKK1) functioning as the partners of FLS2 and EFR, were all increased significantly and uniquely at 24h following 10 mM of Tre treatment (S13 Data; S5 Fig), which are strongly indicating that low concentration of exogenous Tre can effectively trigger plant-pathogen interaction pathways in tobacco leaf in a time-specific way. Activation of these receptors and their partners lead to changes in ion flux and metabolism, accumulation of ROS and hormone ethylene and MAP kinase (MPK) activation, etc [57]. Based on our RNA-seq data, the Plant-pathogen interaction pathways were enriched in both 10T2h and 10T24h. 20 DEGs from 10T2h and 61 DEGs from 10T24h were mapped to this pathway, respectively (S4 and S5 Figs). The majority (15/20 = 75%) of the 20 genes in 10T2h (S12 Data) were down-regulated. In contrast, 53/61 (around 87%) in 10T24h (S13 Data) were up-regulated, indicating that the activation of pathogen resistance genes by exogenous Tre is time-dependent. Beside those receptor like kinases mentioned above, Some cyclic nucleotide gated channels (CNGCs) proteins sub-locating on cytoplasmic membrane as the upstream components in the pathways were up-regulated significantly in the condition of 10T24h. CNGCs activates downstream of Ca2+ -mediated signal (S5 Fig; S13 Data). Functional analyses of members of this channel family have associated many of them with inward Ca2+ currents [58]. More and more evidence implies there is a mutual interplay between Ca2+- and ROS-mediated signaling pathways that might be involved in fine-tuning of intercellular and intracellular signaling networks [59]. One example is calcium acts as the prime regulatory molecule of NADPH oxidases/RBOHs that are the key player of pathogenic ROS generation in plants [60, 61]. In the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, there are 10 members of RBOHs whereas nine members are present in rice plants [61]. In Nicotiana tabacum three members are reported [34, 35]. We measured the mRNA levels of rbohF, rbohD by qRT-PCR (Fig 1D), since they two have been proved for ROS generation in plants [34–36], and both superoxide ion and hydrogen peroxide were induced significantly at 2h and 24h after Tre treatment in tobacco leaves (Fig 1A). One RBOH gene in the RNA-seq data (gi|697111405|) was increased significantly at 24h after 10 mM of Tre treatment too (S5 Fig and S13 Data).

ROS are high reactive molecules, and their excessive accumulation might lead to strong damages to cell membrane system and other structures, thus originally they were deemed as detrimental byproducts during aerobic metabolism, especially when organism suffers environmental stresses. Now, it is undoubted that ROS of sub-toxic levels function as signaling molecules sensing diverse upstream signals coming from developmental processes and environmental stresses [59, 62], and subsequently transduce the signals to downstream targets as a common plant response. Different environmental stresses or stress combinations that occur in field condition often might lead to the formation of different ROS signatures, which perceived by diverse ROS sensors that activate the corresponding stress signals in plants [63–65]. For instance (S5 Fig), Ca2+ and ROS induce expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and formation of localized cell death (LCD) at the site of infection (hypersensitive response) through activation of CDPK that was up-regulated significantly in the condition 10T24h (S13 Data); Ca2+ induces stomatal closure appears through calmodulin (CaM) and calmodulin-like (CML) proteins (main calcium sensors)and ROS/NO productions [66, 67]. In this study, up-regulation of CaM/CML was observed in the condition 10T24h (S5 Fig and S13 Data), and ROS (O2•-andH2O2) were accumulated in tobacco leaves after Tre treatment (Fig 1A). WRKY transcription factors, including WRKY22, 25, 29 and 33, were up-regulated in the condition 10T24h (S13 Data), and they are downstream of mitogen-activated protein kinases, MPK3/6 and MPK4. MPK4 can sense Ca2+-mediated signals and activate the WRKY transcription factors (S5 Fig). Although we did not observe any MPK3, MPK4 and MPK6-like genes in the 1128 DEGs, gene_23843 encodes AP2C1 protein which belongs to the PP2C-superfamily clade B and functions as a MAPK phosphatase that negatively regulates MPK4 and MPK6 [68]. In the RNA-seq data, AP2C1 was down-regulated significantly at 2h after Tre treatment independent of its concentration (S10 Data and Fig 6A), suggesting some MPKs might be activated during a particular window after Tre treatment.

HSPs, also known as molecular chaperones, play critical roles in protein correct folding and subunit assembly, translocation between cellular compartments, and targeting misfolded proteins to the proteasome in diverse normal cellular processes, and protect and stabilize proteins and membrane system against environmental stresses[69, 70], and their expressions are usually regulated by heat shock factors (HSFs) that also respond to diverse biotic and abiotic stresses. For example, it has been reported that Arabidopsis HSFA2, as a key regulator, is involved in signaling pathways of heat, high light and osmotic stress [38, 71]. Accumulated evidence have been gotten recently on redox-dependent regulation of HSFs in plants and mammalian [72, 73], further supporting the hypothesis that some oxidative stress-responsive genes are probably direct targets of oxidative stress-responsive HSFs that act as H2O2 sensors in plants [74]. It is evidenced by the report that Arabidopsis HSFA1a directly senses H2O2 via its N-terminal region from 48 to 74 amino acid residues [75]. FTHS6 encodes a plastid metalloprotease, and it regulates thermomemory in Arabidopsis through regulating HSP21 abundance [76]. Moreover, down-regulation of chloroplast FtsH Protein in TMV–infected tobacco leaves accelerates the hypersensitive reaction [77]. GolS1 encodes a galactinol synthase and is a target of AtHSFA2 under heat stress [38, 71]. The transcription of AtGolS1 was also induced by exogenous H2O2 in Arabidopsis [78] and other abiotic stresses such as drought, salt, or heat stress [79] and hormone ABA [80]. Its over-expression in transgenic plants promoted accumulation of galactinol, raffinose and stachyose, which resulted in enhanced resistance to abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity or cold [79, 80]. It has been reported that an Arabidopsis USP modulates ROS homeostasis under anoxic conditions [81], and one USP in tomato is a phosphorylation target of protein kinase CIPK6 and functions in oxidative stress response pathway [82]. Therefore, the 8 core genes are all in response to oxidative stress directly or indirectly, indicating that ROS are the key regulators for the DEGs triggered by exogenous Tre.

There are some important common mediators such as calcium ions between heat shock responses and defense responses [83]. Our RNA-seq data also evidenced there is a connection between components in plant-pathogen interaction pathways and HSPs triggered by exogenous Tre. As mentioned above, ROS can stimulate some HSFs directly. These HSFs as ROS sensors in turn activate expression of HSP chaperone genes and also regulate expression of ROS scavenger genes [73], such as APX2 that was up-regulated at 2h after Tre treatment (Fig 6A), which is responsible for keeping ROS homeostasis through negative feedback. Many of HSFs can specifically bind DNA sequence 5’-AGAAnnTTCT-3’ referred to as heat shock promoter elements (HSE) that are included in the promoter regions of HSPs. HSFA6B, HSFB2A and 3 HSFB2Bs were up-regulated in one or two conditions out of the four conditions (S3–S6 and S14 Data). Their orthologs in Arabidopsis or rice have strong correlations with MPK3/6 and 4, respectively, base on PPINs (STRING analysis) (S1–S3 Figs). Plant pathogen signaling pathway in KEGG shows that MAP3/4/5/6 play keys roles in the signal transductions of pathogen infection and/or attack together or alone (S4 and S5 Fig). HSFA6B has connections with eight MPKs (3,4,5,6,7,10,12 and 14) and two HSP70 proteins (S1 Fig). HSFB2A associates with four MPKs (1, 3, 5 and 11) and some HSPs (e.g. HSP 70, 80 and 90) (S2 Fig). Although in Arabidopsis, AtHSFB2B only has second shell of interactions with MPK6 (S3A Fig); in rice, HSFB2B (rice gene ID: 4346226) has correlations with three MPKs, respectively (rice gene ID: 4344698, 4341956 and 4349225) (S3B Fig). It has been reported MAP kinase kinase 5 (MPPK5) might be a direct target of HSFB1/HSFB2B based on microarray analysis [43]. In addition, HSFA4A confers plant salt resistance and is regulated by oxidative stress. It has a physical interaction with MPK3 and MPK6 and is phosphorylated by the two mitogen-activated protein kinases [84]. Arabidopsis HSFA2 is also regulated by MPK6-targeted phosphorylation during heat stress response [85]. The heat shock transcription factor HSFB2B is strongly responsive to photorespiratory H2O2 [86]. Some HSPs as HSFs targets are not only involved in heat stress, but also function in microbial pathogenesis such as HSP70 [87]. In addition, HSP90 gets involved in innate immune responses in tobacco through interacting with SGT1 and RAR1 they are critical signaling components in resistance (R) gene-mediated plant resistance responses [88], and HSP90 is also involved in resistance to TMV through interacting with resistance protein N [88, 89]. Besides the top ten KEGG pathway in which the total DEGs were mapped, we found that some other pathways were uniquely enriched in the DEGs triggered by 10mM of Tre, but not in those triggered by 50 mM of Tre, such as ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABC transporters). In the RNA-seq data, 8 ABC transporter genes were up-regulated and 1 gene was down-regulated (Fig 5; S7 Data). The integral membrane proteins transporters are widespread in all living organisms and can be grouped into exporters and importers. They are not only required for organ growth, plant nutrition and plant development, but also respond to both abiotic and biotic stresses [90].

In summary, exogenous Tre as an elicitor molecule recognized by tobacco cells, and trigger intracellular pathways related to defense, via the mutual interplay between calcium and ROS signaling systems (Fig 7).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 7. Core signaling in response to exogenous trehalose treatment.

Abbreviations:PRRs—Pattern-recognition receptors; FLS2—Flagellin insensitive 2; EFR—EF-Tu receptor; CERK1—Chitin elicitor receptor kinase 1;CNGCs—Cyclic nucleotide gated channels; O2•-—superoxide ion; H2O2—hydrogen peroxide; MPKs—MAP kinases; APX2—Ascorbate peroxidase 2; HSFs—Heat shock factors; TF—Transcription factor; HSPs—Heat shock proteins. Dotted arrows represent the unknown pathways.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.g007

Conclusion

This study provides new insight into the molecular basis of Nicotiana tobacum leaves in response to exogenous Tre treatment by comprehensive analysis of gene expression profiles. Our results also showed that tobacco leaf treatment with higher concentration of Tre (50 mM) conferred the plant better disease resistance to TMV. In contrast, a lower concentration of Tre (10 mM) triggered more genes differentially expressed, which are responsive to Ca2+ and ROS-mediated signaling, in noninfectious context. However we didn't investigate any priming effect of Tre which could be involved in protection induced against TMV. Priming is characterized by a faster and/or stronger activation of cellular and molecular defenses responses that are induced following a pathogenic attack. Such a priming effect might explain the better protection obtained with 50mM Tre pretreatment before infection with TMV. For further researches, we will investigate this possibility, and characterize the molecular functions of the DEGs triggered by exogenous Tre via transgenic approaches.

Supporting information

S1 Data. The statistical data of Table 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s001

(XLSX)

S2 Data. List of primers for qRT-PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Data. DEGs expressed in the condition of 10T2h.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s003

(XLSX)

S4 Data. DEGs expressed in the condition of 10T24h.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s004

(XLSX)

S5 Data. DEGs expressed in the condition of 50T2h.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s005

(XLSX)

S6 Data. DEGs expressed in the condition of 50T24h.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s006

(XLSX)

S7 Data. DEGs regulated by 10 mM of trehalose uniquely.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s007

(XLSX)

S8 Data. DEGs regulated by 50 mM of trehalose uniquely.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s008

(XLSX)

S9 Data. Overlapping DEGs regulated by all conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s009

(XLSX)

S10 Data. Overlapping DEGs regulated by 10T2h and 50T2h.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s010

(XLSX)

S11 Data. Overlapping DEGs regulated by 10T24h and 50T24h.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s011

(XLSX)

S12 Data. DEGs of 10T2h in plant pathogen pathway in KEGG.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s012

(XLSX)

S13 Data. DEGs of 10T24h in plant pathogen pathway in KEGG.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s013

(XLSX)

S14 Data. HSFs induced by exogenous trehalose.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s014

(XLSX)

S1 Fig. The PPIN of HSFA6B and MPKs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s015

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The PPIN of HSFB2A and MPKs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s016

(TIF)

S3 Fig. The PPIN of HSFB2B and MPKs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s017

(TIF)

S4 Fig. KEGG map of 10T2h DEGs in plant pathogen pathway.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s018

(TIF)

S5 Fig. KEGG map of 10T24h DEGs in plant pathogen pathway.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217204.s019

(TIF)

References

  1. 1. Elbein AD, Pan YT, Pastuszak I, Carroll D. New insights on trehalose: a multifunctional molecule. Glycobiology. 2003;13(4):17r–27r. WOS:000182463900001. pmid:12626396
  2. 2. Lunn JE, Delorge I, Figueroa CM, Van Dijck P, Stitt M. Trehalose metabolism in plants. Plant Journal. 2014;79(4):544–67. WOS:000340499200002. pmid:24645920
  3. 3. Paul MJ, Primavesi LF, Jhurreea D, Zhang YH. Trehalose metabolism and signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:417–41. WOS:000256593200017. pmid:18257709
  4. 4. Crowe JH. Trehalose as a "chemical chaperone": Fact and fantasy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;594:143–58. WOS:000243103000013. pmid:17205682
  5. 5. Chen W, Zhang XB, Liu MM, Zhang JN, Ye Y, Lin Y, et al. Trehalose protects against ocular surface disorders in experimental murine dry eye through suppression of apoptosis. Exp Eye Res. 2009;89(3):311–8. WOS:000269041900005. pmid:19345212
  6. 6. Luyckx J, Baudouin C. Trehalose: an intriguing disaccharide with potential for medical application in ophthalmology. Clinical ophthalmology. 2011;5:577–81. pmid:21654884; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3102588.
  7. 7. Delorge I, Janiak M, Carpentier S, Van Dijck P. Fine tuning of trehalose biosynthesis and hydrolysis as novel tools for the generation of abiotic stress tolerant plants. Frontiers in plant science. 2014;5. WOS:000334164200001. pmid:24782885
  8. 8. Fernandez O, Bethencourt L, Quero A, Sangwan RS, Clement C. Trehalose and plant stress responses: friend or foe? Trends in plant science. 2010;15(7):409–17. pmid:20494608.
  9. 9. O'Hara LE, Paul MJ, Wingler A. How Do Sugars Regulate Plant Growth and Development? New Insight into the Role of Trehalose-6-Phosphate. Molecular plant. 2013;6(2):261–74. WOS:000317006000005. pmid:23100484
  10. 10. Miranda JA, Avonce N, Suarez R, Thevelein JM, Van Dijck P, Iturriaga G. A bifunctional TPS-TPP enzyme from yeast confers tolerance to multiple and extreme abiotic-stress conditions in transgenic Arabidopsis. Planta. 2007;226(6):1411–21. WOS:000250121700006. pmid:17628825
  11. 11. Yellisetty V, Reddy LA, Mandapaka M. In planta transformation of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) using TPS1 gene for enhancing tolerance to abiotic stresses. J Genet. 2015;94(3):425–34. WOS:000363980200007. pmid:26440081
  12. 12. Ge LF, Chao DY, Shi M, Zhu MZ, Gao JP, Lin HX. Overexpression of the trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase gene OsTPP1 confers stress tolerance in rice and results in the activation of stress responsive genes. Planta. 2008;228(1):191–201. WOS:000256083200016. pmid:18365248
  13. 13. Kretzschmar T, Pelayo MAF, Trijatmiko KR, Gabunada LFM, Alam R, Jimenez R, et al. A trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase enhances anaerobic germination tolerance in rice. Nat Plants. 2015;1(9). Artn 1512410.1038/Nplants.2015.124. WOS:000364383900001.
  14. 14. Williams B, Njaci I, Moghaddam L, Long H, Dickman MB, Zhang XR, et al. Trehalose Accumulation Triggers Autophagy during Plant Desiccation. PLoS genetics. 2015;11(12). ARTN e100570510.1371/journal.pgen.1005705. WOS:000368518400036.
  15. 15. Renard-Merlier D, Randoux B, Nowak E, Farcy F, Durand R, Reignault P. Iodus 40, salicylic acid, heptanoyl salicylic acid and trehalose exhibit different efficacies and defence targets during a wheat/powdery mildew interaction. Phytochemistry. 2007;68(8):1156–64. pmid:17399750.
  16. 16. Tayeh C, Randoux B, Vincent D, Bourdon N, Reignault P. Exogenous Trehalose Induces Defenses in Wheat Before and During a Biotic Stress Caused by Powdery Mildew. Phytopathology. 2014;104(3):293–305. WOS:000331859400009. pmid:24073639
  17. 17. Mostofa MG, Hossain MA, Fujita M. Trehalose pretreatment induces salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings: oxidative damage and co-induction of antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems. Protoplasma. 2015;252(2):461–75. WOS:000350241600008. pmid:25164029
  18. 18. Mostofa MG, Hossain MA, Fujita M, Tran LSP. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms associated with trehalose-induced copper-stress tolerance in rice. Scientific reports. 2015;5. Artn 1143310.1038/Srep11433. WOS:000356505000001.
  19. 19. Shafiq S, Akram NA, Ashraf M. Does exogenously-appliedtrehalose alter oxidatve defense system in the edible part of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) under water-deficit conditions? Sci Hortic-Amsterdam. 2015;185:68–75. WOS:000352046800009.
  20. 20. Akram NA, Irfan I, Ashraf M. Trehalose-induced modulation of antioxidative defence system in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) plants subjected to water-deficit conditions. Agrochimica. 2016;60(3):186–98. WOS:000394079000003.
  21. 21. Bae HH, Herman E, Bailey B, Bae HJ, Sicher R. Exogenous trehalose alters Arabidopsis transcripts involved in cell wall modification, abiotic stress, nitrogen metabolism, and plant defense. Physiologia plantarum. 2005;125(1):114–26. WOS:000231510500012.
  22. 22. Aghdasi M, Smeekens S, Schluepman H. Microarray analysis of gene expression patterns in Arabidopsis seedlings under trehalose, sucrose and sorbitol treatment. Int J Plant Prod. 2008;2(4):309–20. WOS:000260424400004.
  23. 23. Lin YC, Zhang J, Gao WC, Chen Y, Li HX, Lawlor DW, et al. Exogenous trehalose improves growth under limiting nitrogen through upregulation of nitrogen metabolism. BMC plant biology. 2017;17. Artn 24710.1186/S12870-017-1207-Z. WOS:000418834500005.
  24. 24. Tang QY, Zhang CX. Data Processing System (DPS) software with experimental design, statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research. Insect Sci. 2013;20(2):254–60. WOS:000316698600013. pmid:23955865
  25. 25. Hernandez JA, Ferrer MA, Jimenez A, Barcelo AR, Sevilla F. Antioxidant systems and O(2)(.-)/H(2)O(2) production in the apoplast of pea leaves. Its relation with salt-induced necrotic lesions in minor veins. Plant physiology. 2001;127(3):817–31. pmid:11706165; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC129254.
  26. 26. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20. WOS:000340049100004. pmid:24695404
  27. 27. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature methods. 2012;9(4):357–U54. WOS:000302218500017. pmid:22388286
  28. 28. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome biology. 2013;14(4). Artn R3610.1186/Gb-2013-14-4-R36. WOS:000322521300006.
  29. 29. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511–U174. WOS:000277452700032. pmid:20436464
  30. 30. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome biology. 2010;11(10). Artn R10610.1186/Gb-2010-11-10-R106. WOS:000287378900008.
  31. 31. Torres MA, Dangl JL. Functions of the respiratory burst oxidase in biotic interactions, abiotic stress and development. Current opinion in plant biology. 2005;8(4):397–403. WOS:000230835800009. pmid:15939662
  32. 32. Suzuki N, Koussevitzky S, Mittler R, Miller G. ROS and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Plant Cell And Environment. 2012;35(2):259–70. WOS:000298795600006. pmid:21486305
  33. 33. Baxter A, Mittler R, Suzuki N. ROS as key players in plant stress signalling. Journal of experimental botany. 2014;65(5):1229–40. WOS:000334099900001. pmid:24253197
  34. 34. Simon-Plas F, Elmayan T, Blein JP. The plasma membrane oxidase NtrbohD is responsible for AOS production in elicited tobacco cells. Plant Journal. 2002;31(2):137–47. WOS:000176905800002. pmid:12121444
  35. 35. Potocky M, Jones MA, Bezvoda R, Smirnoff N, Zarsky V. Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase are involved in pollen tube growth. New Phytol. 2007;174(4):742–51. WOS:000246434500008. pmid:17504458
  36. 36. Gemes K, Kim YJ, Park KY, Moschou PN, Andronis E, Valassaki C, et al. An NADPH-Oxidase/Polyamine Oxidase Feedback Loop Controls Oxidative Burst Under Salinity. Plant physiology. 2016;172(3):1418–31. WOS:000391172300006. pmid:27600815
  37. 37. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C-T method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–8. WOS:000258423700018. pmid:18546601
  38. 38. Yu HD, Yang XF, Chen ST, Wang YT, Li JK, Shen Q, et al. Downregulation of Chloroplast RPS1 Negatively Modulates Nuclear Heat-Responsive Expression of HsfA2 and Its Target Genes in Arabidopsis. PLoS genetics. 2012;8(5). ARTN e100266910.1371/journal.pgen.1002669. WOS:000304864000010.
  39. 39. Charng YY, Liu HC, Liu NY, Chi WT, Wang CN, Chang SH, et al. A heat-inducible transcription factor, HsfA2, is required for extension of acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant physiology. 2007;143(1):251–62. WOS:000243350600025. pmid:17085506
  40. 40. Derksen H, Rampitsch C, Daayf F. Signaling cross-talk in plant disease resistance. Plant Sci. 2013;207:79–87. WOS:000319488200011. pmid:23602102
  41. 41. Ikeda M, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M. Arabidopsis HsfB1 and HsfB2b Act as Repressors of the Expression of Heat-Inducible Hsfs But Positively Regulate the Acquired Thermotolerance. Plant physiology. 2011;157(3):1243–54. WOS:000296722300023. pmid:21908690
  42. 42. Kolmos E, Chow BY, Pruneda-Paz JL, Kay SA. HsfB2b-mediated repression of PRR7 directs abiotic stress responses of the circadian clock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(45):16172–7. WOS:000344526800073. pmid:25352668
  43. 43. Kumar M, Busch W, Birke H, Kemmerling B, Nurnberger T, Schoffl F. Heat shock factors HsfB1 and HsfB2b are involved in the regulation of Pdf1.2 expression and pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis. Molecular plant. 2009;2(1):152–65. pmid:19529832; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2639743.
  44. 44. Wiesel L, Newton AC, Elliott I, Booty D, Gilroy EM, Birch PRJ, et al. Molecular effects of resistance elicitors from biological origin and their potential for crop protection. Frontiers in plant science. 2014;5. Artn 65510.3389/Fpls.2014.00655. WOS:000347110000001.
  45. 45. Dittrich P, Mayer M. Inhibition of stomatal opening during uptake of carbohydrates by guard cells in isolated epidermal tissues. Planta. 1978;139(2):167–70. pmid:24414157.
  46. 46. Gao J, Wang N, Xu SS, Li Y, Wang Y, Wang GX. Exogenous application of trehalose induced H2O2 production and stomatal closure in Viciafaba. Biol Plantarum. 2013;57(2):380–4. WOS:000321769900025.
  47. 47. Song YW, Miao YC, Song CP. Behind the scenes: the roles of reactive oxygen species in guard cells. New Phytol. 2014;201(4):1121–40. WOS:000338510200008. pmid:24188383
  48. 48. Singh R, Parihar P, Singh S, Mishra RK, Singh VP, Prasad SM. Reactive oxygen species signaling and stomatal movement: Current updates and future perspectives. Redox Biol. 2017;11:213–8. WOS:000398212000022. pmid:28012436
  49. 49. Schluepmann H, van Dijken A, Aghdasi M, Wobbes B, Paul M, Smeekens S. Trehalose mediated growth inhibition of Arabidopsis seedlings is due to trehalose-6-phosphate accumulation. Plant physiology. 2004;135(2):879–90. pmid:15181209; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC514123.
  50. 50. Kolbe A, Tiessen A, Schluepmann H, Paul M, Ulrich S, Geigenberger P. Trehalose 6-phosphate regulates starch synthesis via posttranslational redox activation of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(31):11118–23. WOS:000231102400069. pmid:16046541
  51. 51. Yang L, Zhao XJ, Zhu H, Paul M, Yuangang ZG, Tang ZH. Exogenous trehalose largely alleviates ionic unbalance, ROS burst, and PCD occurrence induced by high salinity in Arabidopsis seedlings. Frontiers in plant science. 2014;5. Artn 57010.3389/Fpls.2014.00570. WOS:000344795600001.
  52. 52. Chang BW, Yang L, Cong WW, Zu YG, Tang ZH. The improved resistance to high salinity induced by trehalose is associated with ionic regulation and osmotic adjustment in Catharanthus roseus. Plant PhysiolBioch. 2014;77:140–8. WOS:000334010300017. pmid:24589477
  53. 53. Conrath U, Beckers GJM, Flors V, Garcia-Agustin P, Jakab G, Mauch F, et al. Priming: Getting ready for battle. Mol Plant Microbe In. 2006;19(10):1062–71. WOS:000240692300002. pmid:17022170
  54. 54. Miya A, Albert P, Shinya T, Desaki Y, Ichimura K, Shirasu K, et al. CERK1, a LysM receptor kinase, is essential for chitin elicitor signaling in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104(49):19613–8. WOS:000251525800079. pmid:18042724
  55. 55. Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Navarro L, Oakeley EJ, Jones JDG, Felix G, et al. Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception. Nature. 2004;428(6984):764–7. WOS:000220823800043. pmid:15085136
  56. 56. Zipfel C, Kunze G, Chinchilla D, Caniard A, Jones JDG, Boller T, et al. Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell. 2006;125(4):749–60. WOS:000237886000019. pmid:16713565
  57. 57. Tintor N, Ross A, Kanehara K, Yamada K, Fan L, Kemmerling B, et al. Layered pattern receptor signaling via ethylene and endogenous elicitor peptides during Arabidopsis immunity to bacterial infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110(15):6211–6. WOS:000317537900090. pmid:23431187
  58. 58. Zelman AK, Dawe A, Gehring C, Berkowitz GA. Evolutionary and structural perspectives of plant cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channels. Frontiers in plant science. 2012;3. Artn 9510.3389/Fpls.2012.00095. WOS:000208837900096.
  59. 59. Gorlach A, Bertram K, Hudecova S, Krizanova O. Calcium and ROS: A mutual interplay. Redox Biol. 2015;6:260–71. WOS:000367338700025. pmid:26296072
  60. 60. Ogasawara Y, Kaya H, Hiraoka G, Yumoto F, Kimura S, Kadota Y, et al. Synergistic activation of the Arabidopsis NADPH oxidase AtrbohD by Ca2+ and phosphorylation. Journal Of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283(14):8885–92. WOS:000254465800016. pmid:18218618
  61. 61. Kaur G, Sharma A, Guruprasad K, Pati PK. Versatile roles of plant NADPH oxidases and emerging concepts. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32(3):551–63. WOS:000337855400001. pmid:24561450
  62. 62. Gilroy S, Bialasek M, Suzuki N, Gorecka M, Devireddy AR, Karpinski S, et al. ROS, Calcium, and Electric Signals: Key Mediators of Rapid Systemic Signaling in Plants. Plant physiology. 2016;171(3):1606–15. WOS:000381303300009. pmid:27208294
  63. 63. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Suzuki N, Miller G, Tognetti VB, Vandepoele K, et al. ROS signaling: the new wave? Trends in plant science. 2011;16(6):300–9. WOS:000292238600003. pmid:21482172
  64. 64. Noctor G, Mhamdi A, Foyer CH. The Roles of Reactive Oxygen Metabolism in Drought: Not So Cut and Dried. Plant physiology. 2014;164(4):1636–48. WOS:000334342800010. pmid:24715539
  65. 65. Xia XJ, Zhou YH, Shi K, Zhou J, Foyer CH, Yu JQ. Interplay between reactive oxygen species and hormones in the control of plant development and stress tolerance. Journal of experimental botany. 2015;66(10):2839–56. WOS:000356223900003. pmid:25788732
  66. 66. Cheval C, Aldon D, Galaud JP, Ranty B. Calcium/calmodulin-mediated regulation of plant immunity. Bba-Mol Cell Res. 2013;1833(7):1766–71. WOS:000320496700022. pmid:23380707
  67. 67. Zeng HQ, Xu LQ, Singh A, Wang HZ, Du LQ, Poovaiah BW. Involvement of calmodulin and calmodulin-like proteins in plant responses to abiotic stresses. Frontiers in plant science. 2015;6. Artn 600 10.3389/Fpls.2015.00600. WOS:000359912100001.
  68. 68. Schweighofer A, Kazanaviciute V, Scheikl E, Teige M, Doczi R, Hirt H, et al. The PP2C-type phosphatase AP2C1, which negatively regulates MPK4 and MPK6, modulates innate immunity, jasmonic acid, and ethylene levels in Arabidopsis. The Plant cell. 2007;19(7):2213–24. WOS:000249020800013. pmid:17630279
  69. 69. Beere HM. 'The stress of ding': the role of heat shock proteins in the regulation of apoptosis. J Cell Sci. 2004;117(13):2641–51. WOS:000222650100003. pmid:15169835
  70. 70. Park CJ, Seo YS. Heat Shock Proteins: A Review of the Molecular Chaperones for Plant Immunity. Plant Pathology J. 2015;31(4):323–33. WOS:000365833500001. pmid:26676169
  71. 71. Schramm F, Ganguli A, Kiehlmann E, Englich G, Walch D, von Koskull-Doring P. The heat stress transcription factor HsfA2 serves as a regulatory amplifier of a subset of genes in the heat stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant molecular biology. 2006;60(5):759–72. WOS:000237209500010. pmid:16649111
  72. 72. Manalo DJ, Lin Z, Liu AYC. Redox-dependent regulation of the conformation and function of human heat shock factor 1. Biochemistry-Us. 2002;41(8):2580–8. WOS:000174007100013.
  73. 73. Driedonks N, Xu J, Peters JL, Park S, Rieu I. Multi-Level Interactions Between Heat Shock Factors, Heat Shock Proteins, and the Redox System Regulate Acclimation to Heat. Frontiers in plant science. 2015;6:999. pmid:26635827; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4647109.
  74. 74. Miller G, Mittler R. Could heat shock transcription factors function as hydrogen peroxide sensors in plants? Annals of botany. 2006;98(2):279–88. WOS:000239630500001. pmid:16740587
  75. 75. Liu YF, Zhang CX, Chen J, Guo LH, Li XL, Li WP, et al. Arabidopsis heat shock factor HsfA1a directly senses heat stress, pH changes, and hydrogen peroxide via the engagement of redox state. Plant PhysiolBioch. 2013;64:92–8. WOS:000315547100011. pmid:23399534
  76. 76. Sedaghatmehr M, Mueller-Roeber B, Balazadeh S. The plastid metalloprotease FtsH6 and small heat shock protein HSP21 jointly regulate thermomemory in Arabidopsis. Nature communications. 2016;7:12439. pmid:27561243; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5007455.
  77. 77. Seo S, Okamoto M, Iwai T, Iwano M, Fukui K, Isogai A, et al. Reduced levels of chloroplast FtsH protein in tobacco mosaic virus-infected tobacco leaves accelerate the hypersensitive reaction. The Plant cell. 2000;12(6):917–32. pmid:10852937; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC149093.
  78. 78. Nishizawa A, Yabuta Y, Shigeoka S. Galactinol and raffinose constitute a novel function to protect plants from oxidative damage[Plant physiology. 2008;147(3):1251–63. WOS:000257454000027. pmid:18502973
  79. 79. Taji T, Ohsumi C, Iuchi S, Seki M, Kasuga M, Kobayashi M, et al. Important roles of drought- and cold-inducible genes for galactinol synthase in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Journal. 2002;29(4):417–26. WOS:000174219300003. pmid:11846875
  80. 80. Panikulangara TJ, Eggers-Schumacher G, Wunderlich M, Stransky H, Schoffl F. Galactinol synthase1. A novel heat shock factor target gene responsible for heat-induced synthesis of raffinose family oligosaccharides in arabidopsis. Plant physiology. 2004;136(2):3148–58. WOS:000224497000024. pmid:15466240
  81. 81. Gonzali S, Loreti E, Cardarelli F, Novi G, Parlanti S, Pucciariello C, et al. Universal stress protein HRU1 mediates ROS homeostasis under anoxia. Nat Plants. 2015;1(11). Artn 1515110.1038/Nplants.2015.151. WOS:000364417100001.
  82. 82. Gutierrez-Beltran E, Personat JM, de la Torre F, del Pozo O. A Universal Stress Protein Involved in Oxidative Stress Is a Phosphorylation Target for Protein Kinase CIPK6. Plant physiology. 2017;173(1):836–52. WOS:000394135800061. pmid:27899535
  83. 83. Lee JH, Yun HS, Kwon C. Molecular communications between plant heat shock responses and disease resistance. Molecules and cells. 2012;34(2):109–16. pmid:22710621; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3887810.
  84. 84. Perez-Salamo I, Papdi C, Rigo G, Zsigmond L, Vilela B, Lumbreras V, et al. The Heat Shock Factor A4A Confers Salt Tolerance and Is Regulated by Oxidative Stress and the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases MPK3 and MPK6. Plant physiology. 2014;165(1):319–34. WOS:000335906300025. pmid:24676858
  85. 85. Evrard A, Kumar M, Lecourieux D, Lucks J, von Koskull-Doring P, Hirt H. Regulation of the heat stress response in Arabidopsis by MPK6-targeted phosphorylation of the heat stress factor HsfA2. Peerj. 2013;1. UNSP e5910.7717/peerj.59. WOS:000209186200002.
  86. 86. Li ZR, Wakao S, Fischer BB, Niyogi KK. Sensing and Responding to Excess Light. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:239–60. WOS:000268071800012. pmid:19575582
  87. 87. Hafren A, Hofius D, Ronnholm G, Sonnewald U, Makinen K. HSP70 and Its Cochaperone CPIP Promote Potyvirus Infection in Nicotiana benthamiana by Regulating Viral Coat Protein Functions. The Plant cell. 2010;22(2):523–35. WOS:000275926200021. pmid:20154150
  88. 88. Liu Y, Burch-Smith T, Schiff M, Feng S, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Molecular chaperone Hsp90 associates with resistance protein N and its signaling proteins SGT1 and Rar1 to modulate an innate immune response in plants. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279(3):2101–8. pmid:14583611.
  89. 89. Whitham S, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Choi D, Hehl R, Corr C, Baker B. The product of the tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N: similarity to toll and the interleukin-1 receptor. Cell. 1994;78(6):1101–15. pmid:7923359.
  90. 90. Kang J, Park J, Choi H, Burla B, Kretzschmar T, Lee Y, et al. Plant ABC Transporters. The arabidopsis book. 2011;9:e0153. pmid:22303277; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3268509.