Effect of HIV-exposure and timing of anti-retroviral treatment on immunogenicity of trivalent live-attenuated polio vaccine in infants

Shelina Moonsamy; Melinda Suchard; Shabir A. Madhi

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215079

Abstract

Introduction

The prevalence of HIV infection in South African pregnant women has been approximately 30% over the past decade; however, there has been a steady decline in mother-to-child transmission of HIV from 8% in 2008 to <2% in 2015. We evaluated the immunogenicity of live-attenuated trivalent oral polio vaccine (OPV) following the primary vaccination series (doses at birth, 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age) in HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU), HIV-infected infants initiated on early anti-retroviral treatment (HIV+/ART+), HIV-infected infants on deferred ART (HIV+/ART-) and HIV-unexposed infants (HU) as the referent group.

Methods

Serum polio neutralization antibody titres were evaluated to serotype-1, serotype-2 and serotype-3 at 6, 10 and 18 weeks of age. Antibody titres ≥8 were considered seropositive and sero-protective.

Results

At 18 weeks of age, following the complete primary series of four OPV doses, no differences in GMTs, percentage of infants with sero-protective titres and median fold change in antibody titre (18 weeks vs 6 weeks) were observed in HEU infants (n = 114) and HIV+/ART+ infants (n = 162) compared to HU infants (n = 104) for the three polio serotypes. However, comparing HIV+/ART- infants (n = 70) to HU infants at 18 weeks of age, we observed significantly lower GMTs for serotype-1 (p = 0.022), serotype-2 (p<0.001) and serotype-3 (p<0.001), significantly lower percentages of infants with sero-protective titres for the three serotypes (p<0.001), and significantly lower median fold change in antibody titre for serotype-1 (p = 0.048), serotype-2 (p = 0.003) and serotype-3 (p = 0.008).

Conclusion

Delaying initiation of ART in HIV-infected infants was associated with an attenuated immune response to OPV following a four-dose primary series of vaccines, whereas immune responses to OPV in HIV-infected children initiated on ART early in infancy and HEU children were similar to HU infants.

Citation: Moonsamy S, Suchard M, Madhi SA (2019) Effect of HIV-exposure and timing of anti-retroviral treatment on immunogenicity of trivalent live-attenuated polio vaccine in infants. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0215079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215079

Editor: Heather B. Jaspan, University of Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA

Received: November 19, 2018; Accepted: March 26, 2019; Published: April 19, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Moonsamy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: Raw data (polio antibody titres as obtained following Spearman-Karber Formula) supplied in excel and .pdf format.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Despite significant advances since the launch of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative in 1988, wild poliovirus and circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses remain a risk. The success of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative thus far is largely attributed to polio vaccination, with the key approach being to maintain vaccine coverage of more than 80% to optimise population immunity [1–3]. South Africa has a high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in pregnant women, which has remained unchanged at around 30% for over a decade [4]. Although the percentage of infants born to HIV-infected women has remained fairly consistent since 2004, there has been a decline in mother-to-child transmission of HIV from 8% in 2008 to <2% in 2015 through effective perinatal HIV prevention programs, and therefore an increase in HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants [4–6]. It has been demonstrated that HEU infants suffer increased morbidity and mortality than HIV-unexposed (HU) infants, although underlying reasons are unclear [7, 8]. Immunological aberrations, immune system impairment and reduced transfer of maternal antibodies have been reported in HEU infants compared to HU infants [7, 9, 10]. However, immune responses to vaccines in HEU infants has generally been similar to HU infants following routine immunisation schedules [9].

HIV induced immune system impairment is known to negatively influence the immunogenicity and efficacy of vaccines [11], subsequently affecting the vulnerability of an individual to vaccine-preventable diseases [12–14]. As seen for measles, unless severely immunocompromised, an accelerated immunisation schedule is recommended in children who are HIV-infected [15, 16]. The landscape of management of HIV-infected children with anti-retroviral therapy (ART) has changed since the Children with HIV Early Anti-retroviral (CHER) study, which reported better survival in HIV-infected children initiated on ART immediately upon diagnosis of being HIV-infected at 4–8 weeks of age compared to those in whom ART was deferred until clinical or immunological deterioration [17]. The CHER study led to revised recommendations for the management of HIV-infected children in South Africa and globally [18]. However, despite effective ART regimes, reduced immunogenicity and accelerated waning of immunity has been observed in HIV-infected compared to HIV-uninfected children [12, 13, 19–24].

There are limited studies on immune responses to live-attenuated trivalent oral polio vaccine (OPV) in HIV-infected or HEU children [14, 25–27]. Furthermore, there has been no published study comparing immune responses to OPV in HIV-infected infants initiated on early ART compared to those in whom ART is deferred until clinical or immunological HIV disease progression. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of HIV exposure and timing of ART initiation in HIV-infected children on immune responses to a live-attenuated trivalent OPV.

Materials and methods

Study population

This study analysed serum samples archived at -70°C at the Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Soweto, Johannesburg. Criterion for sample selection was a sample volume of ≥100μl. Briefly, samples were from infants enrolled at 6 to 12 weeks of age from April 2005 to June 2006 in whom the effects of HIV and ART on antibody responses to pneumococcal conjugate vaccine were evaluated [20]. Infants were enrolled into four groups; HU, HEU, HIV-infected infants with CD4⁺ ≥25% randomised to deferred ART (HIV+/ART-) and HIV-infected infants with CD4⁺ ≥25% randomised to immediate ART (HIV+/ART+). The HIV-infected infants were co-enrolled from the CHER study in South Africa [17]. ART was initiated in HIV+/ART- infants when clinically or immunologically indicated, with follow up visits and evaluation every 4 weeks after randomisation until week 24, every 8 weeks thereafter until week 48 and every 12 weeks thenceforth [17]. Clinical criteria for initiation of ART were Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stage C or severe stage B events, and immunologic criteria were CD4⁺ levels of <25% or CD4⁺ counts of less than 1000 cells per cubic millimetre [17]. The first-line ART regimen consisted of zidovudine, lamivudine, and lopinavir-ritonavir given twice daily [17]. Detailed information on these children has been described [13, 17, 20]. The polio vaccination schedule administered during 2005 to 2006 consisted of 6 doses of trivalent OPV, given at birth, 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age, and boosters at 18 months and 6 years [28].

We analyzed for serum polio neutralising antibody titres at 6 weeks of age (i.e. 6 weeks after the birth OPV dose), at 10 weeks of age (i.e. after OPV doses at birth and 6 weeks), and at 18 weeks of age (i.e. following the complete OPV primary schedule of doses at birth, 6, 10 and 14 weeks).

Laboratory testing

Laboratory testing to determine poliovirus antibody titres by serum antibody neutralisation assays was performed at the Centre for Vaccines and Immunology at the National Institute for Communicable Diseases. Serum samples were heat inactivated at 56°C for thirty minutes to inactivate complement. Samples diluted 1/4 were added to an equal volume of diluent in triplicate to a 96 well plate (wells A1, A2 and A3) and subsequently diluted two-fold serially to obtain a starting dilution of 1/8 up to a final dilution of 1/1024 in wells H1, H2 and H3 (total of 24 wells). An equal volume of a set strength of antigen of poliovirus serotype-1, serotype-2 and serotype-3 (NIBSC Sabin reference strains; 01/528, 01/530 and 01/532 respectively) was added to the sera. Test plates were incubated in a moist 35°C, 5% CO₂ incubator for 3 hours to allow specific antigen-antibody binding. Following the incubation, a cell suspension of 3 x 10⁵ cells/ml of Hep2C cells (human cervix carcinoma cells of epithelial morphology, supplied by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America) was added. Test plates were further incubated for five days in a moist 35°C, 5% CO₂ incubator to allow unbound antigen (either poliovirus serotype 1, serotype-2 or serotype-3) to infect the cells, with total cell death and detachment at the end of the five day incubation period. After the five-day incubation, the contents of the test plates were removed and replaced with a 0.05% crystal violet staining solution and allowed to stand at room temperature for 40 minutes. Crystal violet binds to proteins and DNA of adherent cells [29], thereby indicating the absence of unbound antigen and presence of specific antibody. Wells of test plates were then washed twice with ordinary tap water to remove unbound stain and allowed to air-dry. Plates were read using an ELISA plate reader at a wavelength of 570 nanometres. Optical density (OD) readings were transferred to an excel template from which poliovirus antibody titres were calculated. OD values <0.1 indicated virus infection (absence of neutralization and complete cell death and detachment) whereas OD values ≥0.1 indicated an intact cell monolayer and presence of specific antibody levels in the patient’s serum capable of total neutralisation of antigen. OD values <0.1 were assigned a value of “0” and OD values ≥0.1 were assigned a value of “1” for application of the Spearman-Kärber formula to obtain antibody titres [30]. Serum antibody neutralisation titres ranged from 5.66 (0/24 stained wells) to 1448.15 (24/24 stained wells). Each run included internal quality controls, cell controls and virus dilution controls for validation purposes. Polio neutralising antibody titres were determined for all three serotypes, as immunity to one does not protect an individual against another [31]. Serum antibody titres are expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution of serum which protects 50% of the cultures. A seropositive and sero-protective titre was defined as a neutralisation antibody titre of ≥8 (i.e. ≥3 log₂) [32–37].

Statistical analysis

We compared geometric mean antibody titres (GMTs) and percentage of infants with sero-protective titres at 6, 10 and 18 weeks of age, seroconversion rates at 10 and 18 weeks of age, and median fold change in antibody titre at 18 weeks of age versus 6 weeks of age in HEU, HIV+/ART+ and HIV+/ART- groups to HU infants as the referent group. Data was analysed using GraphPad Prism, Version 7.04 (GraphPad Software Inc, California, USA). GMTs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined following log₂ transformation of serum antibody neutralisation titres as obtained following laboratory testing. Seroconversion rates at 10 weeks of age were based on a seronegative antibody titre at 6 weeks of age followed by a seropositive antibody titre at 10 weeks of age. Seroconversion rates at 18 weeks of age were based on a seronegative antibody titre at 6 and 10 weeks of age followed by a seropositive antibody titre at 18 weeks of age. Additionally, we compared GMTs, percentage of infants with sero-protective titres, seroconversion rates and median fold change in antibody titre between the HIV+/ART+ and HIV+/ART- groups. For comparisons of GMTs and fold change, the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparison post hoc test (one-way ANOVA of more than two groups) was used to compare HEU, HIV+/ART+ and HIV+/ART- groups to the HU group; whilst the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare differences between HIV+/ART+ and HIV+/ART- groups (head-to-head comparison of two groups). These tests accommodate differences in sample size between the groups. The Fisher Exact test was used to compare the percentage of infants with sero-protective titres and seroconversion rates between the groups, with application of the Newcombe/Wilson method to compute 95% CIs. P values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant.

Ethics

Approval was obtained from the Faculty of Health Sciences, Higher Degrees Committee (HDC01-13-2014) and Academic Ethics Committee (AEC01-16-2014) of the University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. The initial parent study was also approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of the Witwatersrand (HREC: M080966) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00099658).

Results

Demographic data as available and number of samples tested per group at each timepoint is shown in Table 1.

Download:

Table 1. Demographical data at 6, 10 and 18 weeks of age.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215079.t001

Polio vaccine responses in HIV-infected infants on early ART (HIV+/ART+)

At 6 weeks of age, GMTs were lower in HIV+/ART+ compared to HU infants for serotype-1 (4.2 vs 4.8, p = 0.009), serotype-2 (5.9 vs 7.0, p = 0.009), and serotype-3 (4.1 vs 4.7, p = 0.041); Table 2 and S1 Fig. Furthermore, a lower percentage of HIV+/ART+ infants compared to HU infants had sero-protective titres to serotype-1 (57.1% vs 82.2%, p<0.001) and serotype-3 (47.6% vs 64.5%, p = 0.007); albeit with a similar trend for serotype-2 (86.3% vs 96.5%, p = 0.075); Table 2.

Download:

Table 2. Geometric mean titres and percentage of infants with sero-protective titres at 6, 10 and 18 weeks of age.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215079.t002

At 10 weeks of age, GMTs remained lower in HIV+/ART+ compared to HU infants for serotype-1 (5.1 vs 6.8, p<0.001), serotype-2 (6.5 vs 8.8, p<0.001) and serotype-3 (5.5 vs 7.5, p<0.001); Table 2 and S1 Fig. Similarly, the percentage of infants with sero-protective titres were lower in HIV+/ART+ infants compared to HU infants for serotype-1 (65.1% vs 89.7%, p<0.001), serotype-2 (89.8% vs 98.1%, p = 0.007) and serotype-3 (71.1% vs 87.9%, p = 0.001); Table 2. At this time point, the seroconversion rate in HIV+/ART+ infants was higher than HU infants for serotype-1 (20.5% vs 9.3%, p = 0.018), but comparable for serotype-2 (7.8% vs 4.7%, p = 0.454) and serotype-3 (301.% vs 24.3%, p = 0.334); Table 3. At 18 weeks of age, GMTs (≥7.9 for all serotypes) and the percentage of children with sero-protective titres (≥95.1% for all serotypes) were similar in HIV+/ART+ infants compared to HU children; Table 2 and S1 Fig. Seroconversion rates at 18 weeks of age in HIV+/ART+ infants were higher than HU infants for serotype-1 (21.6% vs 7.7%, p = 0.003) and serotype-3 (21.1% vs 8.7%, p = 0.010), but comparable for serotype 2 (4.9% vs 1.9%, p = 0.324); Table 3. There was no significant difference in the median fold change in antibody titre at 18 weeks versus 6 weeks of age between HIV+/ART+ and HU infants for serotype-1 (25.4 vs 20.2, p = 0.641), serotype-2 (3.2 vs 3.2, p>0.999) and serotype-3 (20.2 vs 10.1, p = 0.944); Table 4.

Download:

Table 3. Seroconversion rates by 10 and 18 weeks of age.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215079.t003

Download:

Table 4. Median fold change in antibody titre at 18 weeks of age versus 6 weeks of age.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215079.t004

Polio vaccine responses in HIV infected infants with deferred ART (HIV+ART-)

At 6 weeks of age, no significant difference in GMTs were seen between HIV+/ART- and HU infants for serotype-1 (4.6 vs 4.8, p>0.999), serotype-2 (6.3 vs 7.0, p = 0.925) and serotype-3 (4.6 vs 4.7, p>0.999); Table 2 and S1 Fig. Likewise, there was no significant difference in the percentage of children with sero-protective titres between HIV+/ART- and HU infants for serotype-1 (71.6% vs 82.2%, p = 0.103), serotype-2 (87.7% vs 93.5%, p = 0.586) and serotype-3 (60.8% vs 64.5%, p = 0.641); Table 2. At 10 weeks of age, the GMTs were, however, significantly lower in HIV+/ART- than HU infants for serotype-1 (5.4 vs 6.8, p = 0.032) and serotype-2 (7.0 vs 8.8, p = 0.007); with a similar trend observed for serotype-3 (6.1 vs 7.5; p = 0.184); Table 2 and S1 Fig. Furthermore, sero-protective titres were significantly less prevalent in HIV+/ART- infants compared to HU infants for serotype-1 (71.6% vs 89.7%, p = 0.003), serotype-2 (89.2% vs 98.1%, p = 0.017) and serotype-3 (71.6% vs 87.9%, p = 0.007); Table 2. Seroconversion rates at 10 weeks of age were not significantly different in HIV+/ART- infants compared to HU infants for serotype-1 (12.2% vs 9.3%, p = 0.624), serotype 2 (6.8% vs 4.7%, p = 0.743) and serotype-3 (18.9% vs 24.3%, p = 0.467); Table 3. On clinical and/or immunological evaluation at 10 weeks of age, 5.9% of HIV+/ART- infants met the criteria for ART initiation and were initiated on ART. On evaluation at 14 weeks of age, at the time of the 14-week OPV dose, a further 4.9% of HIV+/ART- infants were initiated on ART. By 18 weeks of age, 5.9% of HIV+/ART- infants were on ART for approximately 10 weeks and 4.9% were on ART for approximately 4 weeks.

At 18 weeks of age, GMTs were significantly lower in HIV+ART- compared to HU infants for serotype-1 (6.1 vs 8.5, p = 0.022), serotype-2 (6.3 vs 8.8, p<0.001) and serotype-3 (5.9 vs 8.5, p<0.001); Table 2 and S1 Fig. In addition, the percentage of HIV+ART- children with sero-protective rates remained significantly lower than HU infants for serotype-1 (74.3% vs 96.2%, p<0.001), serotype-2 (78.6% vs 100.0%, p<0.001) and serotype-3 (75.7% vs 98.1%, p<0.001); Table 2. Notably, the percentage of HIV+/ART- infants with sero-protective titres to serotype-2 was lower at 18 weeks of age at 78.6% compared to 10 weeks of age at 89.2%. Seroconversion rates at 18 weeks of age were not significantly different between HIV+/ART- and HU infants for serotype-1 (11.4% vs 7.7%, p = 0.432), serotype 2 (4.3% vs 1.9%, p = 0.392) and serotype-3 (17.1% vs 8.7%, p = 0.102); Table 3. The median fold change in antibody titre at 18 weeks versus 6 weeks of age was lower in HIV+/ART- infants compared to HU infants for serotype-1 (3.3 vs 20.2, p = 0.048), serotype-2 (0.8 vs 3.2, p = 0.003) and serotype-3 (51.3 vs 10.1, p = 0.008); Table 4.

Polio vaccine responses in HIV infected infants on early ART versus deferred ART (HIV+ART+ vs HIV+ART-)

At 6 weeks of age, the GMTs were not significantly different between HIV+/ART+ and HIV+/ART- infants for serotype-1 (4.2 vs 4.6, p = 0.113), serotype 2 (5.9 vs 6.3, p = 0.163) and serotype-3 (4.1 vs 4.6, p = 0.093); Table 2 and S1 Fig. The percentage of infants with sero-protective titres were also similar at 6 weeks of age between the HIV+/ART+ and HIV+/ART- groups for serotype-2 (86.3% vs 87.8%, p = 0.839) and serotype-3 (47.6% vs 60.8%; p = 0.070), albeit lower for serotype-1 in HIV+/ART+ infants compared to HIV+/ART- infants (57.1% vs 71.6%; p = 0.044); Table 2.

At 10 weeks of age, no significant difference in GMT was observed in HIV+/ART+ infants compared to HIV+/ART- infants for serotype-1 (5.1 vs 5.4, p = 0.509) and serotype-2 (6.5 vs 7.0, p = 0.079), although lower for serotype-3 in HIV+/ART+ infants compared to HIV+/ART- infants (5.5 vs 6.1; p = 0.037); Table 2. The percentage of infants with sero-protective titres were comparable between HIV+/ART+ infants and HIV+/ART- infants for serotype-1 (65.1% vs 71.6%, p = 0.373), serotype-2 (89.8% vs 89.2%, p>0.999) and serotype-3 (71.1% vs 71.6%, p>0.999); Table 2. Seroconversion rates at 10 weeks of age were not significantly different between HIV+/ART+ and HIV+/ART- infants for serotype-1 (20.5% vs 12.2%, p = 0.150), serotype-2 (7.8% vs 6.8%, p>0.999) and serotype-3 (30.1% vs 18.9%, p = 0.083); Table 3. However, by 18 weeks of age, GMTs were higher in HIV+/ART+ compared to HIV+/ART- infants for serotype-1 (8.2 vs 6.1; p = 0.003), serotype-2 (8.0 vs 6.3; p = 0.003), and serotype-3 (7.9 vs 5.9; p<0.001); Table 2. Additionally, a higher percentage of HIV+/ART+ compared to HIV+/ART- infants had sero-protective titres for serotype-1 (95.1% vs 74.3%; p<0.001); serotype-2 (96.3% vs 78.6%; p<0.001) and serotype-3 (95.1% vs 75.7%; p<0.001); Table 2. Seroconversion rates at 18 weeks of age were not significantly different between HIV+/ART+ and HIV+/ART- infants for serotype-1 (21.6% vs 11.4%, p = 0.096), serotype-2 (4.9% vs 4.3%, p>0.999) and serotype-3 (21.0% vs 17.1%, p = 0.592); Table 3. The median fold change in antibody titre at 18 weeks of age versus 6 weeks of age was significantly higher in HIV+/ART+ infants than HIV+/ART- infants for serotype-1 (25.4 vs 3.3, p<0.001), serotype-2 (3.2 vs 0.8, p<0.001) and serotype-3 (20.2 vs 1.3, p<0.001); Table 4.

Polio vaccine responses in HIV-exposed uninfected infants

At 6 weeks of age, the GMT for serotype-1 was significantly lower in HEU infants compared to HU infants (4.0 vs 4.8, p = 0.005), although comparable for serotype-2 (7.3 vs 7.0, p = 0.883) and serotype-3 (4.6 vs 4.7, p>0.999); Table 2 and S1 Fig. Similarly, the percentage of HEU infants with sero-protective titres was lower than HU infants for serotype-1 (61.2% vs 82.2%; p = 0.001), and comparable for serotype-2 (97.4% vs 93.5%, p = 0.201) and serotype-3 (53.4% vs 64.5%, p = 0.104); Table 2. At 10 and 18 weeks of age, there were no differences in GMTs or percentage with sero-protective titres between HEU and HU infants for the three serotypes, with a sero-protective rate of ≥95.6% at 18 weeks of age in both groups; Table 2. Seroconversion rates were seen to be higher at 10 weeks of age in HEU infants compared to HU infants for serotype-1 (30.2% vs 9.3%, p<0.001) and serotype 3 (38.8 vs 24.3, p = 0.022), albeit comparable for serotype-2 (2.6 vs 4.7, p = 0.485). There was no significant difference in seroconversion rates at 18 weeks of age between HEU infants and HU infants for serotype-1 (8.8% vs 7.7%, p = 0.810), serotype-2 (0.0% vs 1.9%, p = 0.226) and serotype-3 (7.9% vs 8.7%, p>0.999); Table 3.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study in which the timing of ART initiation in HIV-infected infants on neutralising antibody immune responses to trivalent OPV was systematically evaluated. Trivalent OPV, containing all three serotypes, has since been replaced in April 2016 with bivalent OPV, containing serotype-1 and serotype-3, in a globally co-ordinated switch following the declaration of serotype-2 eradication in September 2015 [38, 39].

Our study results corroborate findings in relation to other vaccines in that early initiation of ART in HIV-infected infants was generally associated with similar immune responses following the full primary series of OPV compared to HU infants, and superior immune responses compared to HIV-infected infants in whom ART was deferred until clinically or immunologically indicated [13, 20, 40–42]. In contrast, delaying ART until there was clinical or immunological disease progression in HIV-infected children was associated with impaired immune responses, including lower percentage of children with sero-protective titres, compared to either HU or HIV+/ART+ infants following the complete primary series of OPV. Notably, the immune responses in HEU infants to OPV was generally similar to HU infants throughout the study.

At 6 weeks of age, following the birth OPV dose, HIV+/ART+ infants, who were yet to be initiated on ART, had mostly lower polio immunity compared to HU infants. At 10 weeks of age, having initiated ART at 6 weeks of age, polio immunity remained lower in HIV+/ART+ infants compared to HU infants. The reduced transfer of maternal antibodies from HIV-infected mothers, as demonstrated by de Moraes-Pinto et al, and substantiated by the lower sero-protective (i.e. seropositive) rates at 6 and 10 weeks of age may have largely contributed to the lower immunity seen in HIV+/ART+ infants at these time points [43, 44]. The higher seroconversion rates observed in HIV+/ART+ infants at 10 and 18 weeks of age is also likely due to the lower seropositive rates at 6 and 10 weeks of age respectively. At 18 weeks of age, one month post the primary series of four OPV doses and approximately three months on ART, the antibody response in HIV+/ART+ children was comparable to HU infants, indicating that early initiation of ART resulted in reconstitution of the immune responses of these children to OPV.

Surprisingly, unlike infants of the HIV+/ART+ group, polio immunity in infants of the HIV+/ART- group were not significantly different from HU infants at 6 weeks of age, noting that at this time point infants of the HIV+/ART+ group had not initiated ART by then. The reason for the differences in antibody titres at 6 weeks of age between HIV+/ART+ and HIV+/ART- infants compared to HU infants is unclear. At 10 weeks of age, both HIV+/ART+ and HIV+/ART- infants demonstrated mostly inferior neutralizing antibody responses compared to HU infants, suggestive of early deleterious effects of HIV-infection on immune responses to OPV, even in children of CD4⁺ >25%. Impaired immune responses were also described by Troy et al in 9-month old HIV-infected children following at least three OPV doses, with the likelihood of some infants having initiated ART by then [27]. At 18 weeks of age, HIV+/ART- infants demonstrated significantly lower immune responses compared to HU and HIV+/ART+ infants, highlighting the benefits of early ART. Adequate immunity to polio is essential to eliminate the risk of re-emergence of disease and/or prolonged circulation of polioviruses [45–47]. The sero-protection rates amongst HIV+/ART- infants at 18 weeks of age is likely to decline if ART is not initiated and maintained, as a result of continuous deterioration of immune responses in these individuals coupled with declining maternal antibodies. The lower sero-protection rate in HIV+/ART- infants for serotype-2 at 18 weeks of age versus 10 weeks of age may be attributed to these conditions. This implies that any importation of wild poliovirus or circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus would likely circulate in HIV+/ART- individuals and could pose a risk to the general population.

As immunological aberrations have been described in HEU infants, evaluating the immunogenicity of OPV in these infants was warranted [7, 9, 10]. HEU infants are also prone to reduced maternal antibody transfer, and the likely reasons underlying differences to HU infants observed at early ages [43, 44]. A study by Church et al reported similar immune responses to OPV between HEU and HU Zimbabwean infants at 6 months of age following OPV doses at 3, 4 and 5 months of age, although an ELISA assay was used versus the gold standard neutralisation assay; the latter being a better measure of OPV induced immunity [25, 48, 49]. Tejiokem et al reported high seroconversion rates (≥96.2%) in HEU infants of Cameroon and Central African Republic aged 18 to 36 months who received at least four OPV doses in the first year of life [14]. Reassuringly, our findings corroborate the findings of those studies, and indicate that HEU infants mount similar functional antibody responses to OPV compared to HU infants.

Limitations of our study include the non-availability of a birth sample from which one could determine the level of maternal immunity. Study inclusion criteria were restricted to HIV-infected infants with CD4⁺ >25%; and therefore the results may not be generalizable to perinatal HIV-infected children with lower CD4⁺ counts. Also, the study was conducted during the period when only OPV was used in South Africa, with the schedule subsequently changed in 2009 to a combination of OPV at birth and 6 weeks of age, and inactivated polio vaccine at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age with a booster at 18 months [50]. Although the immunogenicity of the combined OPV-IPV schedule in HIV-infected and/or HEU requires further investigation, the majority of sub-Saharan African countries with a high prevalence of HIV are still using OPV vaccines in their primary infant immunization programs.

In conclusion, HIV-infected infants not initiated on early ART demonstrated attenuated immune responses to OPV following a four-dose primary series, and might require additional booster doses of polio vaccine. In contrast, HIV-infected infants with ART initiated as early as 6 weeks of age, and HEU children demonstrated similar immunogenicity compared to HIV-unexposed infants following the primary four-dose OPV schedule. These data provide an additional argument for early HIV diagnosis and initiation of ART where applicable, in line with the WHO global recommendation which was based on the CHER study results [17, 51, 52].

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Scatter plot of geometric mean titre and 95% CI of log₂ transformed antibody titre to polio seroype-1, serotype-2 and serotype-3 at 6, 10 and 18 weeks of age.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215079.s001

(PDF)

S1 Dataset. Raw data of polio antibody titres to serotype-1, serotype-2 and serotype-3 at 6, 10 and 18 weeks of age.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215079.s002

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

Jayendrie Thaver, Lucy Simelane and Heleen du Plessis for their contribution to laboratory testing.

References

1. Anya BM, Moturi E, Aschalew T, Carole Tevi-Benissan M, Akanmori BD, Poy AN, et al. Contribution of polio eradication initiative to strengthening routine immunization: Lessons learnt in the WHO African region. Vaccine. 2016;34(43):5187–92. pmid:27396492
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Bandyopadhyay AS, Garon J, Seib K, Orenstein WA. Polio vaccination: past, present and future. Future Microbiol. 2015;10(5):791–808. pmid:25824845
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Nasir UN, Bandyopadhyay AS, Montagnani F, Akite JE, Mungu EB, Uche IV, et al. Polio elimination in Nigeria: A review. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(3):658–63. pmid:26383769
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Sherman GG, Mazanderani AH, Barron P, Bhardwaj S, Niit R, Okobi M, et al. Toward elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in South Africa: how best to monitor early infant infections within the Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission Program. J Glob Health. 2017;7(1):010701. pmid:28567281
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. South African Medical Research Council. Early mother-to-child transmission of HIV stats plunge 2016 [http://www.mrc.ac.za/media-release/early-mother-child-transmission-hiv-stats-plunge.
6. Bhardwaj S, Barron P, Pillay Y, Treger-Slavin L, Robinson P, Goga A, et al. Elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in South Africa: rapid scale-up using quality improvement. S Afr Med J. 2014;104(3 Suppl 1):239–43. pmid:24893500
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Afran L, Garcia Knight M, Nduati E, Urban BC, Heyderman RS, Rowland-Jones SL. HIV-exposed uninfected children: a growing population with a vulnerable immune system? Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;176(1):11–22. pmid:24325737
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Goetghebuer T, Rowland-Jones SL, Kollmann TR. Editorial: Immune Mechanisms Underlying the Increased Morbidity and Mortality of HIV-Exposed Uninfected (HEU) Children. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1060. pmid:28932223
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Abu-Raya B, Kollmann TR, Marchant A, MacGillivray DM. The Immune System of HIV-Exposed Uninfected Infants. Front Immunol. 2016;7:383. pmid:27733852
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Morden E, Technau KG, Giddy J, Maxwell N, Keiser O, Davies MA. Growth of HIV-Exposed Uninfected Infants in the First 6 Months of Life in South Africa: The IeDEA-SA Collaboration. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0151762. pmid:27049853
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Kerneis S, Launay O, Turbelin C, Batteux F, Hanslik T, Boelle PY. Long-term immune responses to vaccination in HIV-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(8):1130–9. pmid:24415637
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Troy SB, Kouiavskaia D, Siik J, Kochba E, Beydoun H, Mirochnitchenko O, et al. Comparison of the Immunogenicity of Various Booster Doses of Inactivated Polio Vaccine Delivered Intradermally Versus Intramuscularly to HIV-Infected Adults. J Infect Dis. 2015;211(12):1969–76. pmid:25567841
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Simani OE, Adrian PV, Violari A, Kuwanda L, Otwombe K, Nunes MC, et al. Effect of in-utero HIV exposure and antiretroviral treatment strategies on measles susceptibility and immunogenicity of measles vaccine. AIDS. 2013;27(10):1583–91. pmid:24047763
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Tejiokem MC, Gouandjika I, Beniguel L, Zanga MC, Tene G, Gody JC, et al. HIV-infected children living in Central Africa have low persistence of antibodies to vaccines used in the Expanded Program on Immunization. PLoS One. 2007;2(12):e1260. pmid:18060056
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Moss WJ, Griffin DE. Global measles elimination. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4(12):900–8. pmid:17088933
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Scott P, Moss WJ, Gilani Z, Low N. Measles vaccination in HIV-infected children: systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and immunogenicity. J Infect Dis. 2011;204 Suppl 1:S164–78.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Violari A, Cotton MF, Gibb DM, Babiker AG, Steyn J, Madhi SA, et al. Early antiretroviral therapy and mortality among HIV-infected infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2233–44. pmid:19020325
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Collins IJ, Jourdain G, Hansudewechakul R, Kanjanavanit S, Hongsiriwon S, Ngampiyasakul C, et al. Long-term survival of HIV-infected children receiving antiretroviral therapy in Thailand: a 5-year observational cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(12):1449–57. pmid:21054181
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Musher DM, Lahart C, Lacke C, Groover J, Watson D, et al. Antibody to capsular polysaccharides of Streptococcus pneumoniae after vaccination of human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects with 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine. J Infect Dis. 1992;165(3):553–6. pmid:1347058
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Madhi SA, Adrian P, Cotton MF, McIntyre JA, Jean-Philippe P, Meadows S, et al. Effect of HIV infection status and anti-retroviral treatment on quantitative and qualitative antibody responses to pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in infants. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(3):355–61. pmid:20583920
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Kim HN, Harrington RD, Crane HM, Dhanireddy S, Dellit TH, Spach DH. Hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-infected adults: current evidence, recommendations and practical considerations. Int J STD AIDS. 2009;20(9):595–600. pmid:19710329
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Cagigi A, Cotugno N, Giaquinto C, Nicolosi L, Bernardi S, Rossi P, et al. Immune reconstitution and vaccination outcome in HIV-1 infected children: present knowledge and future directions. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8(12):1784–94. pmid:22906931
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Ryder RW, Oxtoby MJ, Mvula M, Batter V, Baende E, Nsa W, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of bacille Calmette-Guerin, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, and oral polio vaccines in newborn children in Zaire infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Pediatr. 1993;122(5 Pt 1):697–702. pmid:8496745
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Falco V, Jordano Q, Cruz MJ, Len O, Ribera E, Campins M, et al. Serological response to pneumococcal vaccination in HAART-treated HIV-infected patients: one year follow-up study. Vaccine. 2006;24(14):2567–74. pmid:16423429
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Church JA, Rukobo S, Govha M, Carmolli MP, Diehl SA, Chasekwa B, et al. Immune responses to oral poliovirus vaccine in HIV-exposed uninfected Zimbabwean infants. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13(11):2543–7. pmid:28857649
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Sanz-Ramos M, Manno D, Kapambwe M, Ndumba I, Musonda KG, Bates M, et al. Reduced Poliovirus vaccine neutralising-antibody titres in infants with maternal HIV-exposure. Vaccine. 2013;31(16):2042–9. pmid:23474309
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Troy SB, Musingwini G, Halpern MS, Huang C, Stranix-Chibanda L, Kouiavskaia D, et al. Vaccine poliovirus shedding and immune response to oral polio vaccine in HIV-infected and -uninfected Zimbabwean infants. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(4):672–8. pmid:23661792
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Expanded Programme on Immunisation. New EPI Vaccines Guidelines: The National Department of Health, Republic of South Africa, 2009 [updated October 2010. https://www.health-e.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/South-Africa-EPI-vaccines-revised-Oct-2010.pdf.
29. Feoktistova M, Geserick P, Leverkus M. Crystal Violet Assay for Determining Viability of Cultured Cells. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2016;2016(4):pdb prot087379.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Ramakrishnan MA. Determination of 50% endpoint titer using a simple formula. World J Virol. 2016;5(2):85–6. pmid:27175354
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Pons-Salort M, Molodecky NA, O’Reilly KM, Wadood MZ, Safdar RM, Etsano A, et al. Population Immunity against Serotype-2 Poliomyelitis Leading up to the Global Withdrawal of the Oral Poliovirus Vaccine: Spatio-temporal Modelling of Surveillance Data. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002140. pmid:27701425
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Frantzidou F, Diza E, Halkia D, Antoniadis A. A seroprevalence study of poliovirus antibody in the population of northern Greece. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(1):68–71. pmid:15649308
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Drexler JF, Grard G, Lukashev AN, Kozlovskaya LI, Bottcher S, Uslu G, et al. Robustness against serum neutralization of a poliovirus type 1 from a lethal epidemic of poliomyelitis in the Republic of Congo in 2010. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(35):12889–94. pmid:25136105
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Asturias EJ, Dueger EL, Omer SB, Melville A, Nates SV, Laassri M, et al. Randomized trial of inactivated and live polio vaccine schedules in Guatemalan infants. J Infect Dis. 2007;196(5):692–8. pmid:17674310
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Fine PE. Polio: measuring the protection that matters most. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(5):673–5. pmid:19624277
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Arita M, Iwai M, Wakita T, Shimizu H. Development of a poliovirus neutralization test with poliovirus pseudovirus for measurement of neutralizing antibody titer in human serum. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18(11):1889–94. pmid:21880850
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Plotkin SA. Vaccines: correlates of vaccine-induced immunity. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(3):401–9. pmid:18558875
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Patel M, Cochi S. Addressing the Challenges and Opportunities of the Polio Endgame: Lessons for the Future. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl_1):S1–S8. pmid:28838196
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Ramirez Gonzalez A, Farrell M, Menning L, Garon J, Everts H, Hampton LM, et al. Implementing the Synchronized Global Switch from Trivalent to Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccines-Lessons Learned From the Global Perspective. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl_1):S183–S92. pmid:28838179
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Palma P, Romiti ML, Cancrini C, Pensieroso S, Montesano C, Bernardi S, et al. Delayed early antiretroviral treatment is associated with an HIV-specific long-term cellular response in HIV-1 vertically infected infants. Vaccine. 2008;26(40):5196–201. pmid:18471944
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Pensieroso S, Cagigi A, Palma P, Nilsson A, Capponi C, Freda E, et al. Timing of HAART defines the integrity of memory B cells and the longevity of humoral responses in HIV-1 vertically-infected children. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(19):7939–44. pmid:19416836
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Romiti ML, Cancrini C, Castelli-Gattinara G, Di Cesare S, Ciaffi P, Bernardi S, et al. Kinetics of the T-cell receptor CD4 and CD8 V beta repertoire in HIV-1 vertically infected infants early treated with HAART. AIDS. 2001;15(16):2075–84. pmid:11684926
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. de Moraes-Pinto MI, Almeida AC, Kenj G, Filgueiras TE, Tobias W, Santos AM, et al. Placental transfer and maternally acquired neonatal IgG immunity in human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis. 1996;173(5):1077–84. pmid:8627057
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. de Moraes-Pinto MI, Verhoeff F, Chimsuku L, Milligan PJ, Wesumperuma L, Broadhead RL, et al. Placental antibody transfer: influence of maternal HIV infection and placental malaria. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;79(3):F202–5. pmid:10194992
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Borba RC, Vidal VM, Moreira LO. The re-emergency and persistence of vaccine preventable diseases. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2015;87(2 Suppl):1311–22. pmid:26312431
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Doherty M, Buchy P, Standaert B, Giaquinto C, Prado-Cohrs D. Vaccine impact: Benefits for human health. Vaccine. 2016;34(52):6707–14. pmid:27773475
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Stern PL. The changing face of vaccines and vaccination. Vaccine. 2016;34(52):6653–4. pmid:27866771
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Ivanov AP, Dragunsky EM. ELISA as a possible alternative to the neutralization test for evaluating the immune response to poliovirus vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2005;4(2):167–72. pmid:15889990
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Simhon A, Lifshitz A, Abed Y, Lasch EE, Schoub B, Morag A. How to predict the immune status of poliovirus vaccinees? A comparison of virus neutralization at a very low serum dilution versus ELISA in a cohort of infants. Int J Epidemiol. 1990;19(1):164–8. pmid:2161806
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Schoub BD. Introduction of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) into the routine immunization schedule of South Africa. Vaccine. 2012;30 Suppl 3:C35–7.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Canals F, Masia M, Gutierrez F. Developments in early diagnosis and therapy of HIV infection in newborns. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19(1):13–25. pmid:28764578
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Sturt A, Troy SB. Overcoming the barriers to timely antiretroviral initiation in HIV-infected infants. J Trop Pediatr. 2014;60(4):267–9. pmid:25085461
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Anya BM, Moturi E, Aschalew T, Carole Tevi-Benissan M, Akanmori BD, Poy AN, et al. Contribution of polio eradication initiative to strengthening routine immunization: Lessons learnt in the WHO African region. Vaccine. 2016;34(43):5187–92. pmid:27396492
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Bandyopadhyay AS, Garon J, Seib K, Orenstein WA. Polio vaccination: past, present and future. Future Microbiol. 2015;10(5):791–808. pmid:25824845
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Nasir UN, Bandyopadhyay AS, Montagnani F, Akite JE, Mungu EB, Uche IV, et al. Polio elimination in Nigeria: A review. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(3):658–63. pmid:26383769
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Sherman GG, Mazanderani AH, Barron P, Bhardwaj S, Niit R, Okobi M, et al. Toward elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in South Africa: how best to monitor early infant infections within the Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission Program. J Glob Health. 2017;7(1):010701. pmid:28567281
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. South African Medical Research Council. Early mother-to-child transmission of HIV stats plunge 2016 [http://www.mrc.ac.za/media-release/early-mother-child-transmission-hiv-stats-plunge.

[ref6] 6. Bhardwaj S, Barron P, Pillay Y, Treger-Slavin L, Robinson P, Goga A, et al. Elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in South Africa: rapid scale-up using quality improvement. S Afr Med J. 2014;104(3 Suppl 1):239–43. pmid:24893500
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Afran L, Garcia Knight M, Nduati E, Urban BC, Heyderman RS, Rowland-Jones SL. HIV-exposed uninfected children: a growing population with a vulnerable immune system? Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;176(1):11–22. pmid:24325737
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Goetghebuer T, Rowland-Jones SL, Kollmann TR. Editorial: Immune Mechanisms Underlying the Increased Morbidity and Mortality of HIV-Exposed Uninfected (HEU) Children. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1060. pmid:28932223
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Abu-Raya B, Kollmann TR, Marchant A, MacGillivray DM. The Immune System of HIV-Exposed Uninfected Infants. Front Immunol. 2016;7:383. pmid:27733852
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Morden E, Technau KG, Giddy J, Maxwell N, Keiser O, Davies MA. Growth of HIV-Exposed Uninfected Infants in the First 6 Months of Life in South Africa: The IeDEA-SA Collaboration. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0151762. pmid:27049853
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Kerneis S, Launay O, Turbelin C, Batteux F, Hanslik T, Boelle PY. Long-term immune responses to vaccination in HIV-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(8):1130–9. pmid:24415637
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Troy SB, Kouiavskaia D, Siik J, Kochba E, Beydoun H, Mirochnitchenko O, et al. Comparison of the Immunogenicity of Various Booster Doses of Inactivated Polio Vaccine Delivered Intradermally Versus Intramuscularly to HIV-Infected Adults. J Infect Dis. 2015;211(12):1969–76. pmid:25567841
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Simani OE, Adrian PV, Violari A, Kuwanda L, Otwombe K, Nunes MC, et al. Effect of in-utero HIV exposure and antiretroviral treatment strategies on measles susceptibility and immunogenicity of measles vaccine. AIDS. 2013;27(10):1583–91. pmid:24047763
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Tejiokem MC, Gouandjika I, Beniguel L, Zanga MC, Tene G, Gody JC, et al. HIV-infected children living in Central Africa have low persistence of antibodies to vaccines used in the Expanded Program on Immunization. PLoS One. 2007;2(12):e1260. pmid:18060056
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Moss WJ, Griffin DE. Global measles elimination. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4(12):900–8. pmid:17088933
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Scott P, Moss WJ, Gilani Z, Low N. Measles vaccination in HIV-infected children: systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and immunogenicity. J Infect Dis. 2011;204 Suppl 1:S164–78.
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Violari A, Cotton MF, Gibb DM, Babiker AG, Steyn J, Madhi SA, et al. Early antiretroviral therapy and mortality among HIV-infected infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2233–44. pmid:19020325
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Collins IJ, Jourdain G, Hansudewechakul R, Kanjanavanit S, Hongsiriwon S, Ngampiyasakul C, et al. Long-term survival of HIV-infected children receiving antiretroviral therapy in Thailand: a 5-year observational cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(12):1449–57. pmid:21054181
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Musher DM, Lahart C, Lacke C, Groover J, Watson D, et al. Antibody to capsular polysaccharides of Streptococcus pneumoniae after vaccination of human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects with 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine. J Infect Dis. 1992;165(3):553–6. pmid:1347058
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Madhi SA, Adrian P, Cotton MF, McIntyre JA, Jean-Philippe P, Meadows S, et al. Effect of HIV infection status and anti-retroviral treatment on quantitative and qualitative antibody responses to pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in infants. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(3):355–61. pmid:20583920
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Kim HN, Harrington RD, Crane HM, Dhanireddy S, Dellit TH, Spach DH. Hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-infected adults: current evidence, recommendations and practical considerations. Int J STD AIDS. 2009;20(9):595–600. pmid:19710329
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Cagigi A, Cotugno N, Giaquinto C, Nicolosi L, Bernardi S, Rossi P, et al. Immune reconstitution and vaccination outcome in HIV-1 infected children: present knowledge and future directions. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8(12):1784–94. pmid:22906931
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Ryder RW, Oxtoby MJ, Mvula M, Batter V, Baende E, Nsa W, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of bacille Calmette-Guerin, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, and oral polio vaccines in newborn children in Zaire infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Pediatr. 1993;122(5 Pt 1):697–702. pmid:8496745
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Falco V, Jordano Q, Cruz MJ, Len O, Ribera E, Campins M, et al. Serological response to pneumococcal vaccination in HAART-treated HIV-infected patients: one year follow-up study. Vaccine. 2006;24(14):2567–74. pmid:16423429
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Church JA, Rukobo S, Govha M, Carmolli MP, Diehl SA, Chasekwa B, et al. Immune responses to oral poliovirus vaccine in HIV-exposed uninfected Zimbabwean infants. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13(11):2543–7. pmid:28857649
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Sanz-Ramos M, Manno D, Kapambwe M, Ndumba I, Musonda KG, Bates M, et al. Reduced Poliovirus vaccine neutralising-antibody titres in infants with maternal HIV-exposure. Vaccine. 2013;31(16):2042–9. pmid:23474309
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Troy SB, Musingwini G, Halpern MS, Huang C, Stranix-Chibanda L, Kouiavskaia D, et al. Vaccine poliovirus shedding and immune response to oral polio vaccine in HIV-infected and -uninfected Zimbabwean infants. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(4):672–8. pmid:23661792
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Expanded Programme on Immunisation. New EPI Vaccines Guidelines: The National Department of Health, Republic of South Africa, 2009 [updated October 2010. https://www.health-e.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/South-Africa-EPI-vaccines-revised-Oct-2010.pdf.

[ref29] 29. Feoktistova M, Geserick P, Leverkus M. Crystal Violet Assay for Determining Viability of Cultured Cells. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2016;2016(4):pdb prot087379.
View Article
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Ramakrishnan MA. Determination of 50% endpoint titer using a simple formula. World J Virol. 2016;5(2):85–6. pmid:27175354
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Pons-Salort M, Molodecky NA, O’Reilly KM, Wadood MZ, Safdar RM, Etsano A, et al. Population Immunity against Serotype-2 Poliomyelitis Leading up to the Global Withdrawal of the Oral Poliovirus Vaccine: Spatio-temporal Modelling of Surveillance Data. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002140. pmid:27701425
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Frantzidou F, Diza E, Halkia D, Antoniadis A. A seroprevalence study of poliovirus antibody in the population of northern Greece. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(1):68–71. pmid:15649308
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Drexler JF, Grard G, Lukashev AN, Kozlovskaya LI, Bottcher S, Uslu G, et al. Robustness against serum neutralization of a poliovirus type 1 from a lethal epidemic of poliomyelitis in the Republic of Congo in 2010. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(35):12889–94. pmid:25136105
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Asturias EJ, Dueger EL, Omer SB, Melville A, Nates SV, Laassri M, et al. Randomized trial of inactivated and live polio vaccine schedules in Guatemalan infants. J Infect Dis. 2007;196(5):692–8. pmid:17674310
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Fine PE. Polio: measuring the protection that matters most. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(5):673–5. pmid:19624277
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Arita M, Iwai M, Wakita T, Shimizu H. Development of a poliovirus neutralization test with poliovirus pseudovirus for measurement of neutralizing antibody titer in human serum. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18(11):1889–94. pmid:21880850
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Plotkin SA. Vaccines: correlates of vaccine-induced immunity. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(3):401–9. pmid:18558875
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Patel M, Cochi S. Addressing the Challenges and Opportunities of the Polio Endgame: Lessons for the Future. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl_1):S1–S8. pmid:28838196
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Ramirez Gonzalez A, Farrell M, Menning L, Garon J, Everts H, Hampton LM, et al. Implementing the Synchronized Global Switch from Trivalent to Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccines-Lessons Learned From the Global Perspective. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl_1):S183–S92. pmid:28838179
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Palma P, Romiti ML, Cancrini C, Pensieroso S, Montesano C, Bernardi S, et al. Delayed early antiretroviral treatment is associated with an HIV-specific long-term cellular response in HIV-1 vertically infected infants. Vaccine. 2008;26(40):5196–201. pmid:18471944
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Pensieroso S, Cagigi A, Palma P, Nilsson A, Capponi C, Freda E, et al. Timing of HAART defines the integrity of memory B cells and the longevity of humoral responses in HIV-1 vertically-infected children. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(19):7939–44. pmid:19416836
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Romiti ML, Cancrini C, Castelli-Gattinara G, Di Cesare S, Ciaffi P, Bernardi S, et al. Kinetics of the T-cell receptor CD4 and CD8 V beta repertoire in HIV-1 vertically infected infants early treated with HAART. AIDS. 2001;15(16):2075–84. pmid:11684926
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. de Moraes-Pinto MI, Almeida AC, Kenj G, Filgueiras TE, Tobias W, Santos AM, et al. Placental transfer and maternally acquired neonatal IgG immunity in human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis. 1996;173(5):1077–84. pmid:8627057
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. de Moraes-Pinto MI, Verhoeff F, Chimsuku L, Milligan PJ, Wesumperuma L, Broadhead RL, et al. Placental antibody transfer: influence of maternal HIV infection and placental malaria. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;79(3):F202–5. pmid:10194992
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Borba RC, Vidal VM, Moreira LO. The re-emergency and persistence of vaccine preventable diseases. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2015;87(2 Suppl):1311–22. pmid:26312431
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Doherty M, Buchy P, Standaert B, Giaquinto C, Prado-Cohrs D. Vaccine impact: Benefits for human health. Vaccine. 2016;34(52):6707–14. pmid:27773475
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Stern PL. The changing face of vaccines and vaccination. Vaccine. 2016;34(52):6653–4. pmid:27866771
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Ivanov AP, Dragunsky EM. ELISA as a possible alternative to the neutralization test for evaluating the immune response to poliovirus vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2005;4(2):167–72. pmid:15889990
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Simhon A, Lifshitz A, Abed Y, Lasch EE, Schoub B, Morag A. How to predict the immune status of poliovirus vaccinees? A comparison of virus neutralization at a very low serum dilution versus ELISA in a cohort of infants. Int J Epidemiol. 1990;19(1):164–8. pmid:2161806
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] PubMed/NCBI

[188] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Schoub BD. Introduction of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) into the routine immunization schedule of South Africa. Vaccine. 2012;30 Suppl 3:C35–7.
View Article
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Canals F, Masia M, Gutierrez F. Developments in early diagnosis and therapy of HIV infection in newborns. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19(1):13–25. pmid:28764578
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] PubMed/NCBI

[195] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Sturt A, Troy SB. Overcoming the barriers to timely antiretroviral initiation in HIV-infected infants. J Trop Pediatr. 2014;60(4):267–9. pmid:25085461
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[197] View Article

[198] PubMed/NCBI

[199] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

Materials and methods

Study population

Laboratory testing

Statistical analysis

Ethics

Results

Polio vaccine responses in HIV-infected infants on early ART (HIV+/ART+)

Polio vaccine responses in HIV infected infants with deferred ART (HIV+ART-)

Polio vaccine responses in HIV infected infants on early ART versus deferred ART (HIV+ART+ vs HIV+ART-)

Polio vaccine responses in HIV-exposed uninfected infants

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Scatter plot of geometric mean titre and 95% CI of log2 transformed antibody titre to polio seroype-1, serotype-2 and serotype-3 at 6, 10 and 18 weeks of age.

S1 Dataset. Raw data of polio antibody titres to serotype-1, serotype-2 and serotype-3 at 6, 10 and 18 weeks of age.

Acknowledgments

References

S1 Fig. Scatter plot of geometric mean titre and 95% CI of log₂ transformed antibody titre to polio seroype-1, serotype-2 and serotype-3 at 6, 10 and 18 weeks of age.