http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1204-0141
Figures
Abstract
Agropyron elongatum (Host.) Neviski (synonym, Thinopyrum ponticum Podp., 2n = 70) has been used extensively as a valuable source for wheat breeding. Numerous chromosome fragments containing valuable genes have been successfully translocated into wheat from A. elongatum. However, reports on the transfer of powdery mildew resistance from A. elongatum to wheat are rare. In this study, a novel wheat-A. elongatum translocation line, 11-20-1, developed and selected from the progenies of a sequential cross between wheat varieties (Lankaoaizaoba, Keyu 818 and BainongAK 58) and A. elongatum, was evaluated for disease resistance and characterized using molecular cytogenetic methods. Cytological observations indicated that 11-20-1 had 42 chromosomes and formed 21 bivalents at meiotic metaphase I. Genomic in situ hybridization analysis using whole genomic DNA from A. elongatum as a probe showed that the short arms of a pair of wheat chromosomes were replaced by a pair of A. elongatum chromosome arms. Fluorescence in situ hybridization, using wheat D chromosome specific sequence pAs1 as a probe, suggested that the replaced chromosome arms of 11-20-1 were 5DS. This was further confirmed by wheat SSR markers specific for 5DS. EST-SSR and EST-STS multiple loci markers confirmed that the introduced A. elongatum chromosome arms belonged to homoeologous group 5. Therefore, it was deduced that 11-20-1 was a wheat-A. elongatum T5DL∙5AgS translocation line. Both resistance observation and molecular marker analyses using two specific markers (BE443538 and CD452608) of A. elongatum in a F2 population from a cross between line 11-20-1 and a susceptible cultivar Yannong 19 verified that the A. elongatum chromosomes were responsible for the powdery mildew resistance. This work suggests that 11-20-1 likely contains a novel resistance gene against powdery mildew. We expect this line to be useful for the genetic improvement of wheat.
Citation: Li X, Jiang X, Chen X, Song J, Ren C, Xiao Y, et al. (2017) Molecular cytogenetic identification of a novel wheat-Agropyron elongatum chromosome translocation line with powdery mildew resistance. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0184462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184462
Editor: Aimin Zhang, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology Chinese Academy of Sciences, CHINA
Received: April 11, 2017; Accepted: August 24, 2017; Published: September 8, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31571752), Key Research and Development Plan of China (No. 2017YFD0100705) and Project of Henan Provincial Youth Backbone Teachers.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L., 2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD) is one of the most important cereals worldwide. Genetic erosion has narrowed the genetic base of common wheat as a result of high selection pressure and repeated use of the adapted germplasm [1]. The wild relatives and related species of wheat represent a large reservoir of useful traits, e.g., good quality, tolerance to low-temperature and salt, resistance to wheat disease and superior numbers of florets and grains, and may provide important genetic resources for broadening the genetic diversity of wheat [2].
Agropyron elongatum (Host.) Neviski (synonym, Thinopyrum ponticum Podp., 2n = 70), a species closely related to wheat, has been used extensively as a valuable source of genes for wheat breeding. Genes that confer exceptional traits include resistance to leaf rust [3], stem rust [4], stripe rust [5], Fusarium head blight [6], common root rot [7], tan spot [8], and dwarfism [9] as well as increased photosynthetic efficiency [10], increased yield and biomas [11]. These traits have been introduced into wheat successfully from A. elongatum, and a few useful wheat cultivars or lines have been developed, such as Xiaoyan 6, Xiaoyan 759, Xiaoyan 22, Gaoyou 504 and Shanrong 3 in China [5], and Oasis and Seri in Mexico [11], indicating A. elongatum can play an important role in the improvement of wheat.
Powdery mildew of wheat caused by Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt) is one of the major diseases all over the world, and it can cause yield losses up to 50% in extremely susceptible cultivars [12]. In recent years, powdery mildew severely threatened wheat production in China. For example, the area of powdery mildew in wheat comes up to 7,400,000 hectares in 2016 in the main wheat-producing regions of China [13]. To date, approximately 42 loci with more than 70 alleles conferring resistance to powdery mildew have been reported [14]. However, many of the available resistance genes have been overcome by newly emerged virulent isolates and can not meet the needs of wheat resistance breeding. Breeding resistant cultivars is generally accepted to be the most economical and effective means to control the disease. Hence, there is an urgent need to exploit new powdery mildew resistant genes for wheat breeding.
Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) can easily identify the presence of alien chromosomes or introgression segments that have been introduced into wheat. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is an efficient and accurate method to discriminate constitution of chromosomes through localizing highly repetitive DNA sequences to specific chromosome sites [15]. In addition to cytological methods, with the development of molecular biology, diverse molecular markers, such as simple sequence repeat (SSR), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR), sequence-tagged site (STS), and PCR-based landmark unique gene (PLUG) [16], have become extremely useful in identifying alien chromatin that has been integrated into the wheat genome and investigating genomic relationships between wheat and its relatives.
In this study, we identified a novel wheat-A. elongatum translocation line 11-20-1 using molecular cytogenetic methods. In addition, the resistance to powdery mildew of 11-20-1 was evaluated. We predict that the validations provided in this paper will facilitate the utilization of this line in wheat breeding programs.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
The materials included wheat cultivars Chinese Spring (CS), Lankaoaizaoba, Keyu 818 and BainongAK 58 (2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD), A. elongatum, two nulli-tetrasomic lines based on CS (CSN5DT5A and CSN5AT5D), and a wheat-A. elongatum derivate line 11-20-1. In our group, a F1 plant from a cross between A. elongatum introduced from Australia and bread wheat Lankaoaizaoba was provided kindly by Mr Tianming Shen. It was further crossed with wheat line Keyu 818, and backcrossed two times using wheat cultivar BainongAK 58, and then selfed for two generations. Finally, we selected line 11-20-1 based on its powdery mildew resistance under natural conditions and identical agronomical traits. Chinese Spring genomic DNA was used as a blocker in the GISH and FISH analyses and as control in molecular marker analyses. A F2 population derived from the cross between line 11-20-1 and a powdery mildew high susceptible cultivar Yannong 19 was also used in this study.
Chromosome preparation
Seeds were germinated on moistened filter paper in petri dishes maintained in a growth chamber at 25 °C in the dark. Root tips were collected and placed immediately in ice water for 20–24 h, fixed in ethanol-acetic acid (3:1) fixative for 2 d and stored in 70% (v/v) ethanol. Root tips were squashed in 45% (v/v) acetic acid. The slides with mitotic metaphase cells were frozen in liquid nitrogen, and they were stored at -20°C until use after cover slips were removed. When plants reached the flag leaf stage, spikes were fixed in ethanol-acetic acid-chloroform (6:1:3) fixative for 12 h and stored in 70% (v/v) ethanol. The anthers were squashed in 45% (v/v) acetic acid to examine the meiotic chromosomes.
GISH and FISH analysis
GISH analysis was conducted to detect A. elongatum chromatin in 11-20-1. Genomic DNA of A. elongatum and Chinese Spring wheat was extracted separately using the method reported by Sharp et al. [17]. Whole genomic DNA of A. elongatum was labeled with the Digoxigenin (DIG)-Nick Translation Mix (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and used as a probe. The genomic DNA from Chinese Spring wheat was sheared for 5 min by ultrasonication and used as a blocker. The hybridization mixture was added onto the slides and denatured at 80 °C for 6 min. Chromosome denaturation, hybridization, and hybridization signal detection were carried out as described by Han et al. [18]. The cells with good hybridization signals were viewed and photographed (Olympus BX51, Japan) equipped with a CCD camera.
The highly repeated DNA sequence, pAs1, was labeled with the DIG-Nick Translation Mix, and hybridization and the detection were the same as in the GISH protocol. This pAs1 probe contains a 1-kb repetitive DNA sequence from Aegilops tauschii and enables identification of chromosome 1A and all the D-genome chromosomes of wheat [19].
Molecular marker analysis
DNA was extracted from leaves of 11-20-1 and its parents and two nulli-tetrasomic lines (CSN5DT5A and CSN5AT5D) by using the same method as above. Here, 560 SSR markers located on different chromosomes, including Xgwm, Xwmc, Xbarc, Xcfa and Xcfd sources (http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/cgi-bin/graingenes/browse.cgi), were used to characterize the genetic composition of 11-20-1. Chinese Spring, Lankaoaizaoba, Keyu 818, BainongAK 58, A. elongatum, and CSN5DT5A and CSN5AT5D were used as control.
To determine the homoeologous group relationships of the introduced A. elongatum chromosomes in 11-20-1, we used 390 EST-SSR (Xcfe, Swes and Xcwem), 145 EST-STS (http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/SNP/new/pcr_primers.shtml) and 149 PCR-based landmark unique gene (PLUG) markers [16] from seven homoeologous groups of wheat chromosomes.
PCR was performed as described by Li et al. [20] using a PTC-200 thermocycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA). The cycling parameters were, 94 °C for 4 min to pre-denature; followed by 36 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 55~6 0 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min (SSR and EST-SSR amplification) or 2 min (EST-STS and PLUG amplification); and then a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min. PCR products were separated on 8% polyacrylamide non-denatured gels and were visualized following silver-staining.
The marker, pLeUCD2 specific for E genome [21,22], was used to detect E chromatin in 11-20-1 and the primer sequences were as follows: F: 5′-ACAATCTGAAAATCTGGACA-3′, R: 5′-TCATATTGAGACTCCTATAA-3′). Amplification was carried out following a program at 94 °C for 4 min; 94 °C for 1 min; 50 °C for 1 min; and 72 °C for 1 min for 36 cycles. The PCR products were separated on 8% polyacrylamide non-denatured gels.
Powdery mildew assessment
Powdery mildew resistance of 11-20-1 at the seedling and adult plant stages was evaluated under natural conditions using the wheat parents (Lankaoaizaoba, Keyu 818 and BainongAK 58) and CS as control in greenhouses that have favorable environments for powdery mildew development in Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China. At the seedling stage, ten seeds per pot for each line were used to evaluate resistance to powdery mildew with two replications. At the one-to two-leaf stage, seedlings were inoculated with a mixture of Bgt collected from other susceptible varieties. Infection types (IT) on individual plants were evaluated about two weeks after inoculation when the control variety CS were all fully infected. A 0–4 infection scale was used to describe IT scores [23], as follows: 0, no visible symptoms; 0; necrotic flecks without sporulation, and 1–4 for strongly resistant, resistant, susceptible and strongly susceptible, respectively. Adult plant powdery mildew test was also carried out in greenhouses in several growing season. The materials were grown in two 2-m long and three row-plot trials. IT on individual plants were recorded based on the same scale described as above when the flag leaves of the susceptible control were fully expanded.
Results
Cytological identification
Root-tip chromosome counts and meiotic observations of pollen mother cells in ten plants showed that 11-20-1 had a mitotic chromosome number of 2n = 42 (Fig 1A) and formed 21 bivalents at meiotic metaphase I (Fig 1B), indicating highly cytological stability.
Mitotic (a) and meiotic I (b) chromosome characteristics of 11-20-1, (a) 2n = 42, (b) 2n = 21II.
GISH and FISH analysis
GISH was used to detect alien genetic materials in 11-20-1. Using A. elongatum genomic DNA as a probe and sheared CS DNA as a blocker, GISH in the root tip cell of 11-20-1 showed that a pair of chromosome short arms displayed bright green hybridization signals, and this demonstrated that the short arms of a pair of wheat chromosomes were replaced by a pair of A. elongatum chromosome arms (Fig 2A). Such indicated that 11-20-1 was a genetically stable wheat-A. elongatum line involving a chromosome translocation.
Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) (a) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis (b) of mitotic chromosome. The probes used for GISH was A. elongatum genomic DNA, and for FISH was pAs1.
FISH using wheat D chromosome specific sequence pAs1 as a probe and sheared CS DNA as a blocker was used to discriminate constitution of chromosomes in 11-20-1. The sequenced FISH revealed that 12 D-chromosomes gave rise to clear hybridization signals, only wheat chromosome 5D was absent (Fig 2B). We deduced that the chromosome arms 5DS of wheat were replaced by a pair of A. elongatum chromosome arms.
Molecular marker analysis
To test the result from GISH/FISH, a total of 560 pairs of microsatellite primers located on different wheat chromosomes were used to analyze the line 11-20-1. Of these SSR markers tested, eight (i.e. Xwmc233, Xbarc130, Xcfd18, Xgwm190, Xcfd189, Xcfd78, Xcfd81 and Xcfd165), known to be on the short arms of wheat chromosome 5D, produced the diagnostic fragments for chromosome arms 5DS in wheat cv. Lankaoaizaoba, Keyu 818, BainongAK 58, CS and CSN5AT5D, but absent in 11-20-1 and CSN5DT5A (Fig 3). Of the 8 markers specific for chromosome arms 5DS, seven were mapped and evenly distributed on the genetic map from Somers et al. [24] (Fig 4). The specific bands of SSR markers on other chromosomes and the long arms of wheat chromosome 5D were present in 11-20-1. These results indicated that the missing chromosome arms were 5DS in 11-20-1, which was in agreement with the results obtained through FISH and GISH analysis.
M DL100, 1 Lankaozaizaoba, 2 Keyu 818, 3 BainongAK 58, 4 A. elongatum, 5 11-20-1, 6 Chinese Spring, 7 CSN5DT5A, 8 CSN5AT5D. The arrow indicates a specific band of chromosome arms 5DS.
To further determine the homoeologous group relationships of the alien chromosome arms, EST-SSR, EST-STS and PLUG markers distributed on seven homologous groups were used to analyze the line 11-20-1. All PLUG markers used in this study did not amplify specific alleles of A. elongatum in 11-20-1. One EST-SSR and 11 EST-STS markers (Fig 5), i.e. Xcwem42, BE352603, BE443538, BE444644, BE498768, BE499257, BE500291, BE606654, CD452608, BF146187, BF202632, and BF293016 (Table 1), which were located on 5AS, 5BS and 5DS of wheat chromosomes, amplified fragments specific for A. elongatum in 11-20-1 but not in the three wheat parent cv. Lankaoaizaoba, Keyu 818 and BainongAK 58. It was suggested that these markers could be used as specific markers of A. elongatum chromosomes in 11-20-1, and the A. elongatum chromosome arms that were introduced into 11-20-1 were homoeologous with the fifth chromosome group in wheat. Therefore, it was deduced that the translocated A. elongatum chromosome arms were 5AgS and 11-20-1 was a wheat-A. elongatum T5DL∙5AgS translocation line.
The arrow indicates an A. elongatum specific band. M DL100 in the EST-SSR primer Xcwem42 and DL2000 in the EST-STS primers, 1 Lankaozaizaoba, 2 Keyu 818, 3 BainongAK 58, 4 A. elongatum, 5 11-20-1.
The marker, pLeUCD2 specific for E genomic chromatin, was used to identify 11-20-1. A band about 277 bp was amplified in 11-20-1 and A. elongatum, but did not appear in wheat parent cv. Lankaoaizaoba, Keyu 818 and BainongAK 58 (Fig 6). This indicated that the introgressed A. elongatum chromosome arms in 11-20-1probably involved E-genome chromatin.
The arrow indicates an A. elongatum specific band. M DL100, 1 Lankaozaizaoba, 2 Keyu 818, 3 BainongAK 58, 4 A. elongatum, 5 11-20-1.
Disease resistance evaluation
The level of disease resistance to powdery mildew was recorded at the seedling and adult plant stage for 11-20-1 and its parents (Table 2). The results showed that wheat parents Lankaoaizaoba, Keyu 818 and BainongAK 58 and control variety CS were high susceptible with IT scores of 4 at the seedling stage, whereas 11-20-1 showed an IT score of 0;. At the adult plant stage, no noticeable symptoms were developed on whole leaves with an IT score of 0 in 11-20-1. In contrast, other three parents and CS were observed to be strongly susceptible with IT scores of 4 (Fig 7). The results indicated that the powdery mildew resistance of 11-20-1 was inherited from A. elongatum.
Plants of 11-20-1 (a) and resistance to powdery mildew at the seedling (b) and adult plant stage (c). 1 A. elongatum, 2 Lankaozaizaoba, 3 Keyu 818, 4 BainongAK 58, 5 11-20-1.
In order to confirm the powdery mildew resistance of 11-20-1 came from A. elongatum, 11-20-1 was crossed to susceptible cultivar Yannong 19 to obtain F1, and then selfed to get the F2 population. The powdery mildew resistance of the F2 plants was evaluated under natural conditions at the seedling stage in greenhouses. On the basis of powdery mildew resistance analysis, the genomic DNA of 20 resistant and 20 susceptible plants were further amplified using two specific markers (BE443538 and CD452608) of A. elongatum chromosomes in 11-20-1. As shown in the Fig 8, the specific bands of A. elongatum were amplified in the 20 powdery mildew resistant plants, while these bands were absent in the 20 susceptible plants. Such results verified that the A. elongatum chromosomes were responsible for the powdery mildew resistance.
PCR amplification using two EST-STS markers BE443538 (a) and CD452608 (b) specific for A. elongatum in 11-20-1. M DL2000, 1 Lankaozaizaoba, 2 Keyu 818, 3 BainongAK 58, 4 A. elongatum, R resistant F2 plants, S susceptible F2 plants.
Discussion
In this study, the novel wheat line 11-20-1 was produced by crossing with three wheat parents. It was most similar to BainongAK 58 because the variety was crossed two times continuously. BainongAK 58 is a popular variety with many important traits such as lodging resistance, disease resistance and yield potential, and it was bred by Center of Wheat Breeding of Henan Institute of Science and Technology in China. In recent years, BainongAK 58 is always the leading variety in Huang-Huai Rivers Facultative Winter Wheat Region of China, and the total acreage in cultivation has exceeded 20,000,000 hectares sine it was released in 2005 [20]. However, BainongAK 58 was susceptible to powdery mildew. The line 11-20-1 reported in this paper with a valuable background of wheat cultivar BainongAK 58 was not only resistant to powdery mildew, but also stable in agronomic performance. This suggests that line 11-20-1 would be good material for wheat breeding.
Numerous chromosome fragments containing valuable genes have been successfully translocated into wheat from A. elongatum using methods of chromosome engineering, whereas reports on the transfer of powdery mildew resistance from A. elongatum to wheat are rare [25]. In this study, we tested the resistance to powdery mildew in wheat line 11-20-1 and its parents, and found that 11-20-1 was almost immune at the seedling and adult plant stage, but three wheat parents (Lankaoaizaoba, Keyu 818 and BainongAK 58) were susceptible to powdery mildew. Both resistance observation and molecular marker analyses using two specific markers (BE443538 and CD452608) of A. elongatum in the F2 population from 11-20-1/Yannong 19 further indicated that the powdery mildew resistance in 11-20-1 came from A. elongatum. Therefore, the 5AgS chromosome arms of A. elongatum possibly contained new powdery mildew genes.
To date, four powdery mildew resistance loci/genes have been located on chromosome 5D, i.e. Pm2 [26], Pm34 [27], Pm35 [28], and PmD57-5D [29]. Pm34 and Pm35 were assigned to chromosome arms 5DL and originated from Aegilops tauschii. Pm2 was mapped to chromosome arms 5DS and found firstly in both hexaploid wheat (Ulka and CI 12632) and Aegilops tauschii [26,30]. PmD57-5D, which was considered to be Pm2, was located on 5DS in a common wheat germplasm D57 [29]. None of these genes is related to A. elongatum. In addition, in the present study, none of the three markers, Xcfd81, Xgwml90 and Xcfdl8 linked to Pm2 [30], amplified the 257 bp allele that is diagnostic for the presence of the gene Pm2 (Fig 3C, 3F and 3H). Recently, Zhan et al. [31] and He et al. [32] identified new powdery mildew resistance genes Pm51 and PmSn0224 in wheat-Th. ponticum introgression lines, respectively, whereas the two genes were localized on chromosome 2BL and 2A. Ji et al. [33] reported that they found a powdery mildew resistant line with introgression of A. elongatum chromatin. But the material they found was an additional line; it must still be crossed with other wheat genotypes to produce translocation lines for use. Therefore, the translocation germplasm 11-20-1 in the present study may provide a new source of resistance from A. elongatum and it can be used easily for wheat resistant breeding in future breeding programs.
It has been reported that most spontaneous wheat-Thinopyrum translocations and substitutions take place in the D genome of wheat, and some in the A genome and rarely in the B genome [34–36]. For example, Chen et al. [9] identified a novel semi-dwarf line 31505–1, where the introgressed Th. ponticum segment was located on 2DL. The powdery mildew resistance gene Pm43 introgressed from Th. intermedium was also located on 2DL [37]. Zhang et al. [38] localized the Yellow dwarf disease resistant gene of Th. intermedium to 7DL. The blue-grained wheat lines, Blue Dark and Blue 58 from Th. ponticum, belonged to 4Ag (4D) disomic substitution lines [39]. Wang et al. [40] localized six small chromosome segments of A. elongatum in line II-1-3 and found that three of six hybridization signals were positioned on D-genome chromosomes. In this study, in combination with GISH, FISH and SSR analyses, a pair of A. elongatum chromosome arms were introduced to the line 11-20-1. The translocation was produced spontaneously from the progeny of a wheat-A. elongatum cross. These results are in agreement with a previous report by Liu et al. [41], who suggested that the reason that the D-genome chromosomes were involved in translocations or substitutions most frequently is possibly because the Thinopyrum genome shares higher homology with the D than with the A or B genomes.
SSR markers mapped on the specific sites of wheat chromosomes are used widely for identifying the substituted wheat chromosomes or segment in wheat-alien introgressions in various relatives of wheat, such as Leymus mollis [42], Agropyron cristatum [43], Triticum timopheevii [44], Secale cereal [45], Thinopyrum intermedium [46], Agropyron elongatum [40] and Aegilops umbellulata [47]. In our study, eight SSR markers, which did not amplify 5DS-specific bands, were able to successfully identify the absence of wheat chromosome arms 5DS in 11-20-1, and this result was further supported by the FISH analysis.
Recently, EST-PCR markers, which were developed from a conserved coding region that showed high levels of collinearity among the cereal genomes, have been used extensively as powerful techniques for determining the homoeologous relationships of alien chromosomes and tracking alien chromosomes in several species, including Secale cereal [48], Leymus mollis [15], Thinopyrum ponticum [49], Psathyrostachys huashanica [50], Agropyron cristatum [43] and Dasypyrum villosum [51]. In this study, we used a group of EST-PCR markers to assign the linkage group of introduced A. elongatum chromosomes in 11-20-1. One EST-SSR and 11 EST-STS multiple-loci markers, which were mapped on 5AS, 5BS and 5DS of wheat chromosomes, amplified specific alleles of A. elongatum in 11-20-1, indicating that the introduced A. elongatum chromosome arms belonged to the fifth homoeologous group. This finding was in agreement with previous reports [52,53], who suggested that natural substitutions usually involve homoeologous chromosomes, and the alien homoeologous chromosome pair compensates for the loss of wheat chromosomes. Compared with the in situ hybridization analyses, these specific markers could identify the translocation lines faster and more effectively, which will be very useful to rapidly identify and trace the translocated fragments in the progenies of translocation lines.
As a complex decaploid species, the genomic composition of A. elongatum has not been completely clarified. Zhang et al. [54] proposed that E and St were two basic genomes of A. elongatum, whereas Chen et al. [55] suggested that the chromosome composition in A. elongatum consists of either the E or J genome, but does not include the St genome. In our experiment, the PCR products with primers specific for the E genome of A. elongatum were present in 11-20-1, implying that the line 11-20-1 contained E chromatin or chromosome segments of A. elongatum. Likewise, the specific fragments for the E genome of A. elongatum were successfully amplified using the same marker in some wheat-Thinopyrum progenies by Li et al. [22].
Compared with substitution or addition lines, translocations are preferred and can be used directly in breeding programs. Both radiation treatment and induced homoeologous recombination have been widely used to produce translocation [34]. Recently, inducing chromosome translocation by ethylmethylsulfone (EMS) was reported in Psathyrostachys huashanica [56]. In order to improve the utilizability of 11-20-1 in wheat breeding, we are now developing new translocation lines containing smaller alien segments than complete chromosome arms 5AgS by the 60Co gamma ray and ethylmethylsulfone treatment, and the ph1b-induced homoeologous recombination method. These newly created translocation lines will provide novel germplasms and valuable materials for applied research and resistant breeding in wheat.
In summary, we developed a new wheat-A. elongatum T5DL∙5AgS translocation line 11-20-1 that was produced spontaneously from the progeny of a wheat-A. elongatum cross. The 11-20-1 line was almost immune to the isolates of powdery mildew at the seedling and adult plant stages, and analyses revealed that the A. elongatum chromosome arms 5AgS possessed powdery mildew resistances gene(s). This new line could be further developed as an important parent material in wheat resistance breeding programs.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mr Tianmin Shen (Tianmin Seed Industry, China) for providing the F1 plant from the cross A. elongatum/Lankaoaizaoba, Dr. Jun Wu (College of Agronomy, Northwest A & F University, China) for providing the pAs1 probe, and Dr. Wenhui Wei (Henan Institute of Science and Technology) for improving this manuscript.
References
- 1. Hoisington D, Khairallah M, Reeves T, Ribaut JM, Skovmand B, Taba S, et al. Plant genetic resources: What can they contribute toward increased crop productivity? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999; 96(11): 5937–5943. pmid:10339521
- 2. Dong YS, Zhou RH, Xu SJ, Li LH, Cauderon Y, Wang RR. Desirable characteristics in perennial Triticease collected in China for wheat improvement. Hereditas. 1992; 116(1): 175–178.
- 3. Friebe B, Jiang J, Knott DR, Gill BS. Compensation indices of radiation-induced wheat–Agropyron elongatum translocations conferring resistance to leaf rust and stem rust. Crop Sci. 1994; 34(2): 400–404.
- 4. Niu Z, Klindworth DL, Yu G, Friesen TL, Chao S, Jin Y, et al. Development and characterization of wheat lines carrying stem rust resistance gene Sr43 derived from Thinopyrum ponticum. Theor Appl Genet. 2014; 127(4): 969–980. pmid:24504553
- 5. Hao WW, Tang CG, Li BC, Hao CY, Zhang XY. Analysis of wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum translocation lines with broad spectrum resistance to stripe rusts. Sci Agric Sin. 2012; 45(16): 3240–3248.
- 6. Fu S, Lv Z, Qi B, Guo X, Li J, Liu B, et al. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of wheat-Thinopyrum elongatum addition, substitution and translocation lines with a novel source of resistance to wheat Fusarium head blight. J Genet Genomics. 2012; 39(2): 103–110. pmid:22361509
- 7. Li HJ, Conner RL, Chen Q, Laroche A, Graf RJ, Kuzyk AD. The transfer and characterization of resistance to common root rot from Thinopyrum ponticum to wheat. Genome. 2004; 47(1): 215–230. pmid:15060618
- 8. Oliver RE, Xu SS, Stack RW, Friesen TL, Jin Y, Cai X. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of four partial wheat–Thinopyrum ponticum amphiploids and their reactions to Fusarium head blight, tan spot, and Stagonospora nodorum blotch. Theor Appl Genet. 2006; 112(8): 1473–1479. pmid:16544125
- 9. Chen G, Zheng Q, Bao Y, Liu S, Wang H, Li X. Molecular cytogenetic identification of a novel dwarf wheat line with introgressed Thinopyrum ponticum chromatin. J Biosci. 2012; 37(1): 149–155. pmid:22357212
- 10. Peng YY, Peng ZS, Song HX. Chromosomal location of the genes associated with photosynthesis of Lophopyrum elongatum (Host) A. Löve in Chinese spring background. Sci Agric Sin. 2005; 38(11): 2182–2188.
- 11. Monneveux P, Reynolds MP, Aguilar JG, Singh RP. Effect of the 7DL.7Ag translocation from Lophopyrum elongatum on wheat yield and related morphological traits under different environments. Plant Breed. 2003; 122(5): 379–384.
- 12. Griffey CA, Das MK, Stromberg EL. Effectiveness of adult-plant resistance in reducing grain yield loss to powdery mildew in winter wheat. Plant Dis. 1993; 77(6): 618–622.
- 13. Zou J, Qiu D, Sun Y, Zheng C, Li J, Wu P, et al. Pm52: effectiveness of the gene conferring resistance to powdery mildew in wheat cultivar Liangxing 99. Acta Agron Sin. 2017; 43(3): 332–342.
- 14. Fu B, Chen Y, Li N, Ma H, Kong Z, Zhang L, et al. pmX: a recessive powdery mildew resistance gene at the Pm4 locus identified in wheat landrace Xiaohongpi. Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 126(4): 913–921. pmid:23400828
- 15. Yang X, Wang C, Li X, Chen C, Tian Z, Wang Y, et al. Development and molecular cytogenetic identification of a novel wheat–Leymus mollis Lm#7Ns (7D) disomic substitution line with stripe rust resistance. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(10): e0140227. pmid:26465140
- 16. Ishikawa G, Nakamura T, Ashida T, Saito M, Nasuda S, Endo TR, et al. Localization of anchor loci representing five hundred annotated rice genes to wheat chromosomes using PLUG markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2009; 118(3): 499–514. pmid:19057889
- 17. Sharp PJ, Kreiss M, Shewry P, Gale MD. Location of β-amylase sequences in wheat and its relatives. Theor Appl Genet. 1988; 75(2): 286–290.
- 18. Han FP, Liu B, Fedak G, Liu ZH. Genomic constitution and variation in five partial amphiploids of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium as revealed by GISH, multicolor GISH and seed storage protein analysis. Theor Appl Genet. 2004; 109(5): 1070–1076. pmid:15197444
- 19. Pedersen C, Langridge P. Identification of the entire chromosome complement of bread wheat by two-color FISH. Genome. 1997; 40(5): 589–593. pmid:18464850
- 20. Li XJ, Hu TZ, Li G, Jiang XL, Feng SW, Dong N, et al. Genetic analysis of broad-grown wheat cultivar BainongAK 58 and its sib lines. Acta Agron Sin. 2012; 38(3): 436–446.
- 21. Wang RR, Wei JZ. Variations of two repetitive DNA sequences in several Triticeae genomes revealed by polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. Genome. 1995; 38(6): 1221–1229. pmid:8654916
- 22. Li HJ, Wang XM, Chen HG, Li W, Liu DT, Zhang HY. Reaction of wheat-Thinopyrum progenies and wheat germplasm to sharp eyespot. Acta Agron Sin. 2013; 39(6): 999−1012.
- 23. Si QM, Zhang XX, Duan XY, Sheng BQ. Identification of isolates of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici. Sci Agric Sin. 1987; 20(5): 64–70.
- 24. Somers DJ, Isaac P, Edwards K. A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2004; 109(6): 1105–1114. pmid:15490101
- 25. Li H, Wang X. Thinopyrum ponticum and the promising source of resistance to fungal and viral diseases of wheat. J Genet Genomics. 2009; 36(9): 557–565. pmid:19782957
- 26. McIntosh RA, Baker EP. Cytogenetic studies in wheat IV. Chromosomal location and linkage studies involving the Pm2 locus for powdery mildew resistance. Euphytica. 1970; 19(1): 71–77.
- 27. Miranda LM, Murphy JP, Marshall D, Leath S. Pm34: a new powdery mildew resistance gene transferred from Aegilops tauschii Coss. to common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2006; 113(8): 1497–1504. pmid:16953419
- 28. Miranda LM, Murphy JP, Marshall D, Cowger C, Leath S. Chromosomal location of Pm35, a novel Aegilops tauschii derived powdery mildew resistance gene introgressed into common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2007; 114(8): 1451–1456. pmid:17356863
- 29. Ma H, Kong Z, Fu B, Li N, Zhang L, Jia H, et al. Identification and mapping of a new powdery mildew resistance gene on chromosome 6D of common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2011; 123(7): 1099–1106. pmid:21755339
- 30. Qiu YC, Sun XL, Zhou RH, Kong XY, Zhang SS, Jia JZ. Identification of microsatellite markers linked to powdery mildew resistance gene Pm2 in wheat. Cereal Res Commun. 2006; 34(4): 1267–1273.
- 31. Zhan H, Li G, Zhang X, Li X, Guo H, Gong W, et al. Chromosomal location and comparative genomics analysis of powdery mildew resistance gene Pm51 in a putative wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum introgression line. PloS ONE. 2014; 9(11): e113455. pmid:25415194
- 32. He F, Bao Y, Qi X, Ma Y, Li X, Wang H. Molecular cytogenetic identification of a wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum translocation. J Genet. 2017; 96(1): 165–169. pmid:28360402
- 33. Ji J, Wang J, Zheng Q, Li JM, Wang ZG, Zhang XQ, et al. A powdery mildew resistant line with introgression of Agropyron elongatum chromatin. Cereal Res Commun. 2009; 37(2): 217–225.
- 34. Friebe B, Jiang J, Raupp WJ, McIntosh RA, Gill BS. Characterization of wheat-alien translocations conferring resistance to diseases and pests: current status. Euphytica. 1996; 91(1): 59–87.
- 35. Han FP, Fedak G, Benabdelmouna A, Armstrong KC, Ouellet T. Characterization of six wheat × Thinopyrum intermedium derivatives by GISH, RFLP and multicolor GISH. Genome. 2003; 46(3): 490–495. pmid:12834067
- 36. Qi L, Friebe B, Zhang P, Gill BS. Homoeologous recombination, chromosome engineering and crop improvement. Chromosome Res. 2007; 15(1): 3–19. pmid:17295123
- 37. He R, Chang Z, Yang Z, Yuan Z, Zhan H, Zhang X, et al. Inheritance and mapping of powdery mildew resistance gene Pm43 introgressed from Thinopyrum intermedium into wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2009; 118(6): 1173–1180. pmid:19214392
- 38. Zhang ZY, Xin ZY, Larkin PJ. Molecular characterization of a Thinopyrum intermedium Group 2 chromosome (2Ai-2) conferring resistance to barley yellow dwarf virus. Genome. 2001; 44(6): 1129–1135. pmid:11768217
- 39. Zheng Q, Li B, Li H, Li Z. Utilization of blue-grained character in wheat breeding derived from Thinopyrum poticum. J Genet Genomics. 2009; 36(9): 575–580. pmid:19782959
- 40. Wang J, Xiang F, Xia G. Agropyron elongatum chromatin localization on the wheat chromosomes in an introgression line. Planta. 2005; 221(2): 277–286. pmid:15616822
- 41. Liu Z, Li D, Zhang X. Genetic relationships among five basic genomes St, E, A, B and D in Triticeae revealed by genomic Southern and in situ hybridization. J Integr Plant Biol. 2007; 49(7): 1080–1086.
- 42. Zhao JX, Du WL, Wu J, Cheng XN, Gao Y, Pang YH, et al. Development and identification of a wheat-Leymus mollis multiple alien substitution line. Euphytica. 2013; 190(1): 45–52.
- 43. Wu J, Yang X, Wang H, Li H, Li L, Li X, et al. The introgression of chromosome 6P specifying for increased numbers of florets and kernels from Agropyron cristatum into wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2006; 114(1): 13–20. pmid:17031609
- 44. Uhrin A, Szakács É, Láng L, Bedő Z, Molnár-Láng M. Molecular cytogenetic characterization and SSR marker analysis of a leaf rust resistant wheat line carrying a 6G(6B) substitution from Triticum timopheevii (Zhuk.). Euphytica. 2012; 186(1): 45–55.
- 45. Tang ZX, Fu SL, Ren ZL, Zhang HQ, Yang ZJ, Yan BJ, et al. Production of a new wheat cultivar with a different 1B.1R translocation with resistance to powdery mildew and stripe rust. Cereal Res Commun. 2008; 36(3): 451–460.
- 46. Lin ZS, Cui ZF, Zeng XY, Ma YZ, Zhang ZY, Nakamura T, et al. Analysis of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium derivatives with BYDV-resistance. Euphytica. 2007; 158(1): 109–118.
- 47. Zhu Z, Zhou R, Kong X, Dong Y, Jia J. Microsatellite marker identification of a Triticum aestivum-Aegilops umbellulata substitution line with powdery mildew resistance. Euphytica. 2006; 150(1): 149–153.
- 48. An D, Zheng Q, Zhou Y, Ma P, Lv Z, Li L, et al. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a new wheat-rye 4R chromosome translocation line resistant to powdery mildew. Chromosome Res. 2013; 21(4): 419–432. pmid:23836161
- 49. Hu LJ, Li GR, Zeng ZX, Chang ZJ, Liu C, Yang ZJ. Molecular characterization of a wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum partial amphiploid and its derived substitution line for resistance to stripe rust. J Appl Genet. 2011; 52(3): 279–285. pmid:21437653
- 50. Du W, Wang J, Pang Y, Li Y, Chen X, Zhao J, et al. Isolation and characterization of a Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng 6Ns chromosome addition in common wheat. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(1): e53921. pmid:23326537
- 51. Qi LL, Pumphrey MO, Friebe B, Zhang P, Qian C, Bowden RL, et al. A novel Robertsonian translocation event leads to transfer of a stem rust resistance gene (Sr52) effective against race Ug99 from Dasypyrum villosum into bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2011; 123(1): 159–167. pmid:21437597
- 52.
Knott DR. Transferring alien genes to wheat. In: Heyne EG (ed) Wheat and wheat improvement, 2nd edn, Monogr 13. American Society of Agronomics, 1987, pp 462–471
- 53. Sepsi A, Molnár I, Szalay D, Molnár-Láng M. Characterization of a leaf rust-resistant wheat–Thinopyrum ponticum partial amphiploid BE-1, using sequential multicolor GISH and FISH. Theor Appl Genet. 2008; 116(6): 825–834. pmid:18224300
- 54. Zhang X, Dong Y, Wang RR. Characterization of genomes and chromosomes in partial amphiploids of the hybrids Triticum aestivum × Thinopyrum ponticum by in situ hybridization, isozyme analysis, and RAPD. Genome. 1996; 39(6): 1062–1071. pmid:18469955
- 55. Chen Q, Conner RL, Laroche A, Thomas JB. Genome analysis of Thinopyrum intermedium and Thinopyrum ponticum using genomic in situ hybridization. Genome. 1998; 41(4): 580–586. pmid:9796107
- 56. Jing F, Wang LM, Wu J, Du WL, Wang XJ, Su JN, et al. Study on inducing chromosome translocation of wheat (Triticum aestivum)-Psathyrostachyshuashanica using Ethylmethylsulfone (EMS). Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology. 2015; 23(5): 561–570.