An efficient method for transgenic callus induction from Vitis amurensis petiole

Tingting Zhao; Zemin Wang; Lingye Su; Xiaoming Sun; Jun Cheng; Langlang Zhang; Sospeter Karanja Karungo; Yuepeng Han; Shaohua Li; Haiping Xin

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179730

Abstract

Transformation is the main platform for genetic improvement and gene function studies in plants. However, the established somatic embryo transformation system for grapevines is time-consuming and has low efficiency, which limits its utilization in functional genomics research. Vitis amurensis is a wild Vitis species with remarkable cold tolerance. The lack of an efficient genetic transformation system for it has significantly hindered the functional identification of cold stress related genes in the species. Herein, an efficient method was established to produce transformed calli of V. amurensis. Segments of petioles from micropropagated plantlets of V. amurensis exhibited better capacity to differentiate calli than leaf-discs and stem segments, and thus was chosen as target tissue for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Both neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPTII) and enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) genes were used for simultaneous selection of transgenic calli based on kanamycin resistance and eGFP fluorescence. Several parameters affecting the transformation efficiency were optimized including the concentration of kanamycin, Agrobacterium stains, bacterial densities, infection treatments and co-cultivation time. The transgenic callus lines were verified by checking the integration of NPTII gene into calli genomes, the expression of eGFP gene and the fluorescence of eGFP. Up to 20% of the petiole segments produced transformed calli after 2 months of cultivation. This efficient transformation system will facilitate the functional analysis of agronomic characteristics and related genes not only in V. amurensis but also in other grapevine species.

Citation: Zhao T, Wang Z, Su L, Sun X, Cheng J, Zhang L, et al. (2017) An efficient method for transgenic callus induction from Vitis amurensis petiole. PLoS ONE 12(6): e0179730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179730

Editor: Ji-Hong Liu, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (MOE), CHINA

Received: April 21, 2017; Accepted: June 2, 2017; Published: June 22, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, no. 31471857, HX, http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/; the National Natural Science Foundation of China, no. 31672132, HX, http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/; and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS, no. 2015281, HX, http://www.yicas.cn/.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations: 2,4-D, 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid; 6-BA, 6-Benzyladenine; AS, Acetosyringone; BSA, Bovine serum albumin; eGFP, Enhanced green fluorescent protein; IAA, Indole-3-acetic acid; MES, 4-morpholinoethanesulphonic acid; MS, Murashige and Skoog’s medium; NPTII, Neomycin phosphotransferase; PVP, Polyvinyl pyrrolidone

Introduction

Genetic transformation systems are one of the most important platforms that are used for genetic improvement and also for functional analyses of genes in plants. As one of the most important fruit crops cultivated worldwide, the regeneration and genetic transformation of grapevines has been widely studied. Somatic embryogenesis has been reported in several Vitis species and derived from various explants such as ovules [1, 2], anthers [2], leaves and petioles [3–5], and tendrils [6]. Organogenesis was reported using leaves and petioles as explants [5, 7, 8, 9]. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of grape has been reported, and the factors affecting transformation efficiency such as genotype, Agrobacterium strain and selection regime have been studied [10–19]. Genotype significantly affected regeneration and transformation [14, 20], and suitable strategies need to be developed for specific Vitis species.

To date, anther-derived somatic embryogenesis has been the primary method used for transformation of V. vinifera cultivars such as ‘Thompson Seedless’ [18, 21], but the time required and low efficiency of this procedure has limited its usefulness in functional genomics studies in grapevines. A few studies have used transformation systems to illustrate gene function in grapevines. Transgenic ‘Chardonnay’ containing magainin genes exhibited significant reductions in crown gall symptoms compared to non-transformed controls [22]. The expression of stilbene synthase gene from V. pseudoreticulata increased the resveratrol concentration in transgenic ‘Thompson Seedless’ [23]. The function of VvCBF4 in cold tolerance was verified and its possible downstream genes were identified in transgenic V. vinifera cv. Freedom [24]. Zhou et al. reported that overexpressing of VpPUB23 in ‘Thompson Seedless’ decreased resistance to powdery mildew[18].

V. amurensis is a wild Vitis spp. species with remarkable cold tolerance [25]. Numerous candidate genes that correlated to low temperature responses in V. amurensis were identified [26, 27], but the lack of a suitable transformation system hindered the functional studies of key genes for cold hardiness in the species. Some cold stress-related transcription factors were transformed into Arabidopsis to identify their functions and related signal pathways [28–32]. However, due to the different genomic backgrounds between Arabidopsis and V. amurensis, it was difficult to illustrate specific signal transduction pathways under cold stress in V. amurensis by using the Arabidopsis transformation system.

In the present study, a quick and efficient system was developed to produce transformed calli in V. amurensis. Micropropagated plantlets of V. amurensis (collected from Changbai Mountain in Jilin province, Northeastern China) were used as parent material. A vector, pSAK277-eGFP, containing the selective marker gene NPTII (conferring resistance to kanamycin) and reporter gene eGFP were applied during Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Suitable explants were chosen by comparing the callus derived from leaf-discs, stem segments and petiole segments. Several factors that influenced transgenic efficiency were evaluated including Agrobacterium strains, selection regime, infection and co-cultivation conditions. Positive calli were confirmed by PCR analysis and eGFP fluorescence observation. The possible use of this transformation system is also discussed.

Materials and methods

Plant material and growth conditions

Micropropagated plantlets of V. amurensis, and of V. vinifera cv. Muscat Hamburg and Centennial Seedless, were grown on 1/2 MS [33] solid medium supplemented with 30 g L⁻¹ sucrose, 7 g L⁻¹ agar and 0.2 mg L⁻¹ IAA in conical flasks (35 mL) in a growth chamber at 26°C. The average photosynthetic photon flux was 100 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ with a 16 h light and 8 h dark cycle. Five weeks old plantlets were used for explant collection. The non-transformed and transformed explants were maintained on 90×15 mm Petri dish with 25 mL modified B5 solid medium supplemented with 0.25 g L⁻¹ casein hydrolysate, 5 g L⁻¹ PVP, 0.58 g L⁻¹ MES (pH 5.8), 30 g L⁻¹ sucrose, 0.1 mg L⁻¹ 6-BA, 0.1 mg L⁻¹ 2, 4-D, 7 g L⁻¹ agar and 0–20 mg L⁻¹ kanamycin. The explants were cultured in the dark at 26°C.

Selection of suitable explants and kanamycin concentration for transformation

The leaf-discs (5 mm in diameter), and stem and petiole segments (3–5 mm in length) of V. amurensis were used for evaluating its differentiation capacity. Explants were grown under the above-mentioned conditions without kanamycin. A total of 30 leaf-discs, stem segments and petiole segments were cultivated in each Petri dish, respectively. Each experiment was repeated three times. The differentiation rate and status of calli were recorded after 30 days of cultivation.

To establish an appropriate kanamycin concentration for selecting transformed calli, petiole segments were cultivated in medium with different concentrations of kanamycin (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg L^-1). A total of 30 petiole segments were cultivated in each Petri dish at each kanamycin concentration with three replicates of each dish. The differentiation rate of petiole segments was evaluated after 30 days of cultivation. The optimal concentration of kanamycin (20 mg L^-1) that inhibited the development of callus was selected and used in all subsequent transformation experiments to select transformed callus.

Vector construction

The eGFP gene was amplified from pEZS-NL vector using the primers eGFP-F1 (5'-CGGAATTCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAG-3') and eGFP-R1 (5'-CCGCTCGAGCTTG TACAGCTCGTCCATGCC-3'), resulting in an eGFP DNA fragment without a stop codon. After double digestion by EcoRI and XhoI, the fragment was ligated into pSAK277 vector downstream of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter and upstream of FLAG tags (with stop codon, S1 Fig). The NPTII gene in pSAK277 vector was used as a selective marker for transgenic calli during petiole segment transformation.

Transformation and generation of transgenic callus from petiole segments

The plasmid of pSAK277-eGFP was transformed into A. tumefaciens strain EHA105 by electroporation. Agrobacterium was then cultured overnight in YEP liquid medium (10 g L^-1 tryptone, 5 g L^-1 NaCl, 10 g L^-1 yeast extract) at 28°C on a rotary shaker (220 rpm) supplemented with 50 mg L^-1 rifampicin and 100 mg L^-1 spectinomycin. Prior to transformation, Agrobacterium were centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 10 min and washed twice with sterile, distilled water and then re-suspended in 50 mL liquid MS medium containing 100 μM AS (acetosyringone). The suspended cells were incubated on a shaker (120 rpm) at 28°C for 3 hours. The suspended cells (OD₆₀₀ = 0.5) were then used for transformation. The petiole segments (3–5 mm) were submerged in bacterial solution for 8 min and then blotted dry on filter paper. The petiole segments were subsequently placed on modified B5 solid medium and co-cultivated 2 days at 26°C in the dark. The fragments were then washed twice in sterile, distilled water containing 400 mg L^-1 carbenicillin and 400 mg L^-1 cefotaxime. The washed petiole segments were blotted dry on filter paper and then transferred to Petri dishes containing 26 mL modified B5 solid medium (400 mg L⁻¹ carbenicillin, 400 mg L⁻¹ cefotaxime and 20 mg L⁻¹ kanamycin) and cultured at 26°C in the dark. The petioles segments with kanamycin-resistant calli or only calli were transferred monthly into fresh modified B5 solid medium with 200 mg L⁻¹ carbenicillin and 200 mg L⁻¹ cefotaxime.

Another set of A. tumefaciens strains, LBA4404 and GV3101, also transformed with pSAK277-eGFP, were used for petiole segment transformation to evaluate transformation efficiency. The EHA105 strain containing pSAK277-eGFP plasmid was used to optimize the parameters such as the concentration of the bacteria cells (OD₆₀₀ = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0), the infection time (4, 8, 12 and 16 min) and the co-cultivation time (1, 2, 3 and 4 days), respectively, during petiole segment transformation. Thirty petiole segments were cultured per Petri dish and three replicates dishes were established for each transformation condition. After 6 weeks, the kanamycin-resistant calli with observable eGFP fluorescence were counted as positive calli. The transformation frequency was defined as the percentage of petiole segments that produced the transgenic callus.

eGFP fluorescence observation

The eGFP fluorescence in kanamycin-resistant calli was monitored using a fluorescence microscope (ECLIPSE 80i, Nikon). GFPuv was excited at 465–495 nm and emitted through a 515–555 nm bandpass filter. The callus that grew well on kanamycin containing medium and with detectable eGFP fluorescence was designated as a positive callus. The possible chimera of positive calli was detected. Positive calli were incubated in enzyme solution (2% Cellulase R10, 0.5% Macerozyme R10, 0.4M Mannitol, 20mM KCl, 10mM CaCl₂, 0.1% BSA, 20mM MES, pH 5.8) at 26°C in dark for 7 hours [34, 35]. The percentage of cells with eGFP fluorescence was counted from more than 100 cells. The experiment was replicated three times and a total of five callus lines (derived from different petiole segments) were checked.

Molecular analysis of transgenic callus lines

About 0.5 g calli from five positive and one non-transformed callus lines was collected, respectively. The total genomic DNA was isolated from these samples by using Plant Genomic DNA kit (Cat: DP305-03, TIANGEN, China). PCR was carried out to detect the insertion of NPTII gene in the genomes of calli using the forward primer NPTII-F (5'-ATTACCTTATCCGCAACTTCTTTACC-3') and a reverse primer NPTII-R (5'-AGCCCCTGATGCTCTTCGTC-3').

Total RNA was extracted from collected samples with Column Plant RNAout 2.0 (Cat: 90404–50, TIANDZ, China). First cDNA strands were synthetized by TransScript^® One-step gDNA Remover and cDNA synthesis SuperMix (Transgen, China). A pair of primers were designed according to the eGFP DNA sequences (eGFP-F2: 5'-ATGGTGAGCAAGGGGA G -3') and (eGFP-R2: 5'-CTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCC-3') to validate the expression of eGFP gene in transgenic calli.

The PCR was performed the following conditions: 94°C for 3 min; 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min; and 72°C for 10 min. The plasmid DNA of pSAK277-eGFP was used as a positive control while the DNA or cDNAs from non-transformed calli were used as a negative control. Amplified fragments were detected by UV after electrophoresis on agarose gel (1.1%, w/v) with Ethidium Bromide.

Statistical analysis

The reported experimental data represent at least three independent biological repeats. Where appropriate, results are reported as mean values ± standard errors (SE). Mean comparisons were calculated by Student’s t-test, and P-values and data sizes were indicated in the figure legends.

Results

Selection of suitable types of explants for transformation

Three kinds of explants including leaf-discs, stem and petiole segments were chosen to evaluate their differentiation capacity. As shown in Fig 1, all the explants generated calli within 30 days. The calli formed from petiole segments (Fig 1A) and leaf-discs (Fig 1C) were a cream yellow color and friable in structure. The calli derived from petiole segments were bigger than from leaf-discs after 30 days of cultivation. In contrast, the calli formed from stem segments were white with dehydrated structure (Fig 1B). Therefore, petiole segments were selected as suitable explants for the following transformation.

Download:

Fig 1. Selection of optimal explant types for transformation.

Calli generated from: A: petiole segments; B: stem segments; C: leaf discs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179730.g001

Optimal kanamycin concentration of callus formation

Kanamycin is a widely used antibiotic in grape post-transformation selection, and the tolerance of different tissues to kanamycin is quite variable [10, 16, 36, 37]. In order to find a suitable concentration of kanamycin for transgenic calli selection, petiole segments were cultured on Petri dishes with medium containing 5, 10, 15 or 20 mg L^-1 kanamycin for 30 days in the dark at 26°C. Petiole segments that were on similar medium without kanamycin were used as control. The differentiation proportion, defined as the percentage of petiole segments that showed visible callus, was used in evaluating the inhibition of kanamycin during callus formation. As shown in Fig 2A, almost all of the petiole segments (96.86%) produced callus without kanamycin. Conversely, when kanamycin was added to the media, the differentiation proportion declined rapidly, showing a negative correlation with the concentration of kanamycin (Fig 2B–2E and 2F). When 15 and 20 mg L^-1 kanamycin were added to the media, only 20.48% and 10.8% of petiole segments produced callus, respectively. It was noted that the growth of the calli was also severely inhibited when the concentration of kanamycin was increased. After 30 days culture, calli that were less than 1 mm³ were found on petiole segments when 15 mg L^-1 kanamycin was added to the medium (Fig 2D), while nearly invisible calli were found on medium with 20 mg L^-1 kanamycin (Fig 2E), which indicated that the differentiation and proliferation of nontransformed calli from petiole segments were very inhibited. Thus, 20 mg L^-1 kanamycin was employed for selecting positive transgenic calli from petiole segments.

Download:

Fig 2. The effect of kanamycin on callus formation from petiole segments.

A: Calli generated from petiole segments on medium without kanamycin for 30 days; B-E: Petiole segments on medium containing 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/L kanamycin, respectively; F: The calculated differentiation proportion of petiole segments under different kanamycin concentrations. Data are the mean values ± SE of three biological replicates. * and ** indicate significant differences between control and treatments at P<0.05 or P<0.01 (Student’s t-test), respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179730.g002

Agrobacterium strain

Three Agrobacterium strains (EHA105, LBA4404 and GV3101) are commonly used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in plants. Here, these strains were also used to assess their transformation efficiency in a petiole segment-based transformation system. A binary vector, pSAK277-eGFP, was transferred into all three strains. After re-cultivation, the suspended bacteria (OD₆₀₀ = 0.5) were used to infect petiole segments. The eGFP fluorescence was detected by microscope to confirm successful transformation in calli. As shown in Fig 3A, the highest transformation efficiency (29.91%) was achieved by using GV3101. In comparison with GV3101, EHA105 had a similar transformation efficiency (25.31%) and no statistically significant difference was found between these two strains. In contrast, only 3.14% of petiole segments produced positive calli during LBA4404-mediated transformation. These results indicated that both GV3101 and EHA105 were suitable for petiole segment transformation in V. amurensis.

Download:

Fig 3. Optimizing parameters for Agrobacterium-mediated petiole segment transformation in V. amurensis.

A: The transformation efficiency of petiole segments on different Agrobacterium strains (EHA105, GV3101 and LBA4404). B: The effect of bacterial concentration (OD₆₀₀ = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0) during transformation. C: The effect of infection time (4, 8, 12 and 16 min) on transformation. D: The effect of co-cultivation times (1, 2, 3 and 4 days) on transformation. All of the data are the mean values ± SE of three biological replicates. Lower and upper case letters indicate significant differences between treatments at P<0.05 or P<0.01 (Student’s t-test), respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179730.g003

Optimized procedure for Agrobacterium-mediated petiole segment transformation in V. amurensis

During Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in plants, the density of the bacteria, infection and co-cultivation time are the key factors that affect transformation efficiency. Here, the A. tumefaciens strain EHA105, containing a binary vector pSAK277-eGFP, was used in the following experiment to optimize the parameters during petiole segment transformation.

Bacterial density.

In order to discover the effect of bacterial density during transformation, re-cultivated cells at different concentrations (OD₆₀₀ = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0) were used to infect the petiole segments. After 8 min, petiole segments were co-cultivated with bacteria on solid medium for 2 days. Petiole segments with transgenic callus were counted after two months and, as shown in Fig 3B, transformation efficiency was up to 22.6% when using re-cultivated bacteria that had an OD₆₀₀ at 0.5. Acceptable transformation efficiency (16.9%) was also achieved from the bacteria that had an OD₆₀₀ at 1.0. The percentage of petiole segments which formed positive callus declined when the density of bacteria was increased during infection. It was observed that only 5.48% of the segments could produce transgenic callus when OD₆₀₀ was at 2.0 for re-cultivated bacteria, which indicated that a high concentration of bacteria inhibited the Agrobacterium- mediated transformation process.

Infection time.

Based on the results from bacterial density analysis, the evaluation of a suitable infection time with bacteria that had an OD₆₀₀ at 0.5 during the transformation processes was conducted. Four time spans (4, 8, 12 and 16 min) were chosen for infection according to previous reports [19, 37], and two days co-cultivation was performed. As the results show in Fig 3C, transformation efficiency varied greatly when different infection times were used. The highest transformation efficiency (21.51%) was achieved when petiole segments were infected for 8 min. When shorter or longer infection times were used, the transformation efficiency dropped dramatically. These results imply that 8 min is the best infection time for petiole segment transformation, coupled with bacterial density (OD₆₀₀ = 0.5) and 2 days co-cultivation.

Co-cultivation.

Co-cultivation treatment is a post-transformation step which is used to increase transformation efficiency [19, 38]. An inappropriate co-cultivation treatment may reduce the yields of transgenic calli and also increase the risk of unmanageable Agrobacterium contamination during positive calli selection. So, after infection (8 min), four co-cultivation treatments (the same medium but with different periods of time including 1, 2, 3 and 4 days) were tested. As shown in Fig 3D, the transformation efficiency of 1 day of co-cultivation treatment was only 1.01%, which indicated an insufficient period for the interactions between petiole segments and bacteria. The highest transformation efficiency (24.14%) occurred with 2 days co-cultivation. Further, longer co-cultivation treatments of more than 2 days decreased transformation efficiency (10.83% for 3 days, 9.69% for 4 days). The lower transformation efficiency may be due to the browning at the end of some petiole segments, where the transgenic calli may originate after 3 or 4 days co-cultivation (data not shown). Thus,the 2 days co-cultivation treatment was the best period of time to achieve more transgenic callus lines.

The eGFP fluorescence observation and molecular analysis of transformants

The optimized parameters above were used for V. amurensis petiole segment transformation. Almost all calli were generated from the ends of the segments on kanamycin-containing medium after one month cultivation (Fig 4A). The callus was pale yellow and easy to distinguish from the segments. The expression of eGFP gene was confirmed by strong eGFP fluorescence observed from newly-formed calli (Fig 4B and 4C), which indicated that 20 mg L^-1 kanamycin was sufficient to inhibit the formation of un-transformed calli. The petiole segments were transferred into new medium monthly until the callus was big enough to cultivate separately (Fig 4D). The different transgenic callus lines (Fig 4E) were divided into small patches respectively, for proliferation on new medium. About 3 g of callus were produced after one month cultivation for each transgenic callus line, which provided enough material for transcription, translation and metabolism-related analyses.

Download:

Fig 4. eGFP fluorescence observation and molecular analysis of transformants.

A: Transformed calli generated from the end of the petiole segments of V. amurensis after 30 days cultivation. B, C: Bright-field and eGFP fluorescence results of callus emphasized by a red mark in A. D: Transformed calli generated from the end of the petiole segments of V. amurensis after 60 days cultivation. E: Different transgenic callus lines were cultivated in new medium. F, G: Bright-field and eGFP fluorescence results of digested cells from one transgenic callus line. H: Amplification of NPTII gene fragments from the genomic DNAs of non-transformed calli (NT), pSAK277-eGFP plasmid (P) and 5 transgenic lines (T1-T5). I: Amplification of eGFP gene fragments from the cDNAs of non-transformed calli (NT) and 5 transgenic lines (T1-T5). The plasmid of pSAK277-eGFP (P) was used as positive control for PCR amplification. Fluorescence microscope (ECLIPSE 80i, Nikon). GFPuv was excited at 465–495 nm and emitted through a 515–555 nm bandpass filter.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179730.g004

The possible chimera of transgenic calli with un-transformed cells was analyzed by detecting the eGFP fluorescence in detached cells of calli. A total of five transgenic callus lines were detected, and cells were collected by digesting the calli with cellulase and macerozyme. The bright-field and fluorescence detection results of one transgenic callus line is shown in Fig 4F and 4G. The green fluorescence of eGFP was detected in all of the cells from five transgenic lines. The eGFP fluorescence was found both in the nucleus and cytoplasm, which was in consensus with its localization in other plant cells. These results demonstrated that no un-transformed cells were interfused into transgenic callus.

The DNA and total RNA were isolated from non-transformed calli and five transgenic callus lines where the insertion of the NPTII gene into the callus genome and the transcription of eGFP gene were checked. A 515 bp NPTII gene fragment was successfully amplified from pSAK277-eGFP plasmid and all transgenic callus lines (Fig 4H) but failed from non-transformed calli. The expression analysis of eGPF gene also showed similar results (Fig 4I). These results, combined with observed fluorescence from eGFP, confirmed the successful transformation of target genes into the calli from V. amurensis petiole segments.

Discussion

It was reported that transformation in grapevines is dramatically affected by the species, cultivar and explant tissues used [14, 20, 39]. Here, a petiole segment-based transformation system was established for V. amurensis. However when two V. vinifera cultivars (‘Muscat Hamburg’ and ‘Centennial Seedless’) were used with the optimized procedure used for V. amurensis petiole segments, almost negligible transgenic callus (a transformation efficiency less than 1%) was generated at the ends of petiole segments. This result implied that genetic background is key for successful petiole segment transformations.

Agroinfiltration-based transient transformation systems were established using grapevine leaves, and stable transformed cell lines were generated in V. vinifera cv. Sugraone [40]. Here, petiole segments from plantlets were chosen as explants due to their excellent differentiation capacity. Sterile plantlets of V. amurensis were cultivated in conical flasks and proliferated for 6 weeks, which facilitated petiole collection without any restrictions. V. amurensis petioles from the vineyard were also used at the beginning of explant selection. Petioles were cut after sterilization with 70% alcohol and 2% hypochlorite. When petioles from the vineyard were used, necrotic tissue was evident at the end of the petiole segments and callus was not formed after 2 months, which indicated that either the sterilization condition or concentration of kanamycin were not suitable for vineyard–derived petioles.

Hygromycin and kanamycin are used as selection markers for grapevine transformation [10, 19]. In comparison with kanamycin, explants from grapevine were more sensitive to hygromycin used at 2–10 mg L^-1 for selection [19, 41]. In our pre-experiment, 10 mg L^-1 hygromycin completely inhibited callus generation from petiole segments. The appropriate selection concentration of hygromycin was difficult to ascertain in petiole segment cultivation. Therefore, pSAK277 vector which contained NPTII gene was chosen and kanamycin was used as the selectable marker in petiole segment transformation. The concentration of kanamycin used for selection varied from 15–300 mg L^-1 in somatic embryogenesis-based transformation [16, 17, 18, 19, 42]. In this study, an optimal concentration of kanamycin at 20 mg L^-1 was chosen and confirmed by eGFP fluorescence observation. No chimeric cells were found in selected calli which also supported use of the concentration of kanamycin chosen in petiole segment transformation for transgenic callus selection.

The effect of A. tumefaciens strain on grapevine transformation has been previously described [16, 40]. Torregrosa et al. found that super-virulent strain EHA105 increased transformation efficiency when compared to the widely used strain LBA4404[14]. This observation is in accordance with our results since strain EHA105 showed higher transformation efficiency than strain LBA4404. In addition, the strain of GV3101 has a similar performance and both it and EHA105 were usable in petiole segment transformation. Besides the strains, the density of bacteria, infection treatment and co-cultivation time affected the transformation process. The high concentration of bacteria and long infection treatment and co-cultivation periods prohibited the formation of transgenic calli from petiole segments (Fig 3). Ahmed et al. also reported that the transformation efficiency of embryos dropped when inoculation of more than 10 min or co-cultivation with bacteria for more than 2 days was used [19]. This may explain the host/pathogen interaction between Agrobacterium and grape cells which leads to cell death and tissue necrosis [43]. Thus, in our experiment, a low concentration of bacteria (OD₆₀₀ = 0.5) with moderate infection and co-cultivation periods of 8 min and 2 days, respectively, were used to increase transformation efficiency.

Here, we established a quick and efficient system to obtain transformed calli of V. amurensis. In one transformation, more than 20 transgenic callus lines were obtained simultaneously during transformation using 100 petiole segments. Generation of sufficient materials from different transgenic callus lines were achieved within 3 months, which could be used for transcription, translation and metabolism-related studies in grapevines, especially in V. amurensis. This transformation system will be vital in studying the function of cold stress-related genes, where such transcription factors will accelerate the explanation of cold acclimation mechanisms in V. amurensis. In recent years, a large numbers of genes related to fruit quality and stress responses in grapevines have been widely identified courtesy of published genome sequences and powerful omics research platforms [44–46]. This petiole segment transformation system also provides an ideal assay platform for quickly identifying key genes in these biological processes.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The diagram of pSAK277-eGFP vector construction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179730.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Mengxiang Sun (Wuhan University) for critical review of this manuscript. We thank Professor Douglas D. Archbold (University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY) for revising this manuscript. Thanks for the help from Prof. Jinming Chen and Prof. Chunfeng Yang for the manipulation of fluorescence microscope.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: HX SL ZW TZ.
Formal analysis: TZ ZW.
Funding acquisition: HX.
Investigation: TZ ZW LS LZ XS JC SK.
Methodology: HX ZW XS JC.
Project administration: HX.
Resources: YH.
Supervision: HX.
Visualization: TZ ZW.
Writing – original draft: TZ ZW.
Writing – review & editing: HX.

References

1. Mullins MG, Srinivasan C. Somatic embryos and plantlets from an ancient clone of the grapevine (cv. Cabernet-Sauvignon) by apomixis in vitro. J Exp Bot. 1976; 27:1022–1030.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Gray DJ, Mortensen JA. Initiation and maintenance of long term somatic embryogenesis from anthers and ovaries of Vitis longii ‘Microsperma’. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 1987; 9:73–80.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Martinelli L, Bragagna P, Poletti V, Scienza A. Somatic embryogenesis from leaf and petiole derived callus of Vitis rupestris. Plant Cell Rep. 1993; 12:207–210. pmid:24197021
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Robacker C. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from muscadine grape leaf explants. Hortic Sci. 1993; 28:53–55.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Cheng ZM, Reisch BL. Shoot regeneration from petioles and leaves of Vitis × labruscana ‘Catawba’. Plant Cell Rep. 1989; 8:403–406. pmid:24233363
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Salunkhe CK, Rao PS, Mhatre M. Induction of somatic embryogenesis and plantlets in tendrils of Vitis vinifera L. Plant Cell Rep. 1997; 17:65–67.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Clog E, Bass P, Walter B. Plant regeneration by organogenesis in Vitis rootstock species. Plant Cell Rep. 1990; 8:726–728. pmid:24232927
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Stamp JA, Colby SM, Meredith CP. Direct shoot organogenesis and plant regeneration from leaves of grape Vitis spp. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 1990; 22:127–133.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Stamp JA, Colby SM, Meredith CP. Improved shoot organogenesis from leaves of grape. J Am Hortic Sci. 1990; 115:1038–1042.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Colby SM, Meredith CP. Kanamycin sensitivity of cultured tissues of Vitis. Plant Cell Rep. 1990; 9: 237–240. pmid:24226816
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Gray DJ. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature zygotic embryos of muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia) cultivars. Am J Bot. 1992; 542–546.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Franks T, He DG, Thomas M. Regeneration of transgenic shape Vitis vinifera L. Sultana plants: genotypic and phenotypic analysis. Mol Breeding. 1998; 4: 321–333.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Das D, Reddy M, Upadhyaya K, Sopory S. An efficient leaf-disc culture method for the regeneration via somatic embryogenesis and transformation of grape Vitis vinifera L. Plant Cell Rep. 2002; 20: 999–1005.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Torregrosa L, Iocco P, Thomas MR. Influence of Agrobacterium strain, culture medium, and cultivar on the transformation efficiency of Vitis vinifera L. Am J Enol Viticult. 2002; 53: 183–190.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Wang Q, Li P, Hanania U, Sahar N, Mawassi M, Gafny R, et al. Improvement of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation efficiency and transgenic plant regeneration of Vitis vinifera L. by optimizing selection regimes and utilizing cryopreserved cell suspensions. Plant Sci. 2005; 168: 565–571.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. López-Pérez AJ, Velasco L, Pazos-Navarro M, Dabauza M. Development of highly efficient genetic transformation protocols for table grape Sugraone and Crimson Seedless at low Agrobacterium density. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2008; 94: 189–199.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Li ZT, Dhekney SA, Dutt M, Gray D. An improved protocol for Agrobacterium- mediated transformation of grapevine Vitis vinifera L. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2008; 93: 311–321.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Zhou Q, Dai L, Cheng S, He J, Wang D, Zhang J, et al. A circulatory system useful both for long-term somatic embryogenesis and genetic transformation in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Thompson Seedless. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2014; 118: 157–168.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Ahmed M, Khan N, Hafiz IA, Abbasi NA, Anjum MA, et al. Effect of Various Factors on the Efficiency of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Grape Vitis vinifera L. Vegetos. 2015; 28:171–178.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Harst M, Bornhoff BA, Zyprian E, Töpfer R. Influence of culture technique and genotype on the efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of somatic embryos (Vitis vinifera) and their conversion to transgenic plants. Vitis. 2000; 39:99–102.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Agüero C B, Meredith C P, Dandekar A M. Genetic transformation of Vitis vinifera L. cvs Thompson Seedless and Chardonnay with the pear PGIP and GFP encoding genes. Vitis. 2015; 45: 1.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Vidal JR, Kikkert JR, Malnoy MA, Wallace PG, Barnard J, Reisch BI. Evaluation of transgenic 'Chardonnay' (Vitis vinifera) containing magainin genes for resistance to crown gall and powdery mildew. Transgenic Res. 2006; 15: 69–82. pmid:16475011
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Fan CH, Pu N, Wang XP, Wang YJ, Fang L, Xu WR, et al. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) with a novel stilbene synthase gene from Chinese wild Vitis pseudoreticulata. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2008; 92:197–206.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Tillet RL, Wheatley MD, Tattersall Elizabeth AR, Schlauch KA, Cramer GR, Cushman JC. The Vitis vinifera C-repeat binding protein 4 (VvCBF4) transcriptional factor enhances freezing tolerance in wine grape. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011; 10: 105–124. pmid:21914113
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Fennell A. Freezing tolerance and injury in grapevines. Journal of Crop Improvement. 2004; 10:201–235.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Xin HP, Zhu W, Wang LN, Xiang Y, Fang LC, Li GT, et al. Genome wide transcriptional profile analysis of Vitis amurensis and Vitis vinifera in response to cold stress. Plos One. 2013; 8: e58740. pmid:23516547
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Xu WR, Li RM, Zhang NB, Ma FL, Jiao YT, Wang ZP. Transcriptome profiling of Vitis amurensis, an extremely cold-tolerant Chinese wild Vitis species, reveals candidate genes and events that potentially connected to cold stress. Plant Mol Biol. 2014; 86: 527–541. pmid:25190283
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Xu WR, Zhang NB, Jiao YT, Li RM, Xiao DM, Wang ZP. The grapevine basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor positively modulates CBF-pathway and confers tolerance to cold-stress in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Rep. 2014; 41: 5329–5342. pmid:24859977
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Xu WR, Jiao YT, Li RM, Zhang NB, Xiao DM, Ding XL, et al. Chinese wild-growing Vitis amurensis ICE1 and ICE2 encode MYC-type bHLH transcription activators that regulate cold tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plos One. 2014; 9: e102303. pmid:25019620
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Fang LC, Su LY, Sun XM, Li XB, Sun MX, Karungo SK, et al. Expression of Vitis amurensis NAC26 in Arabidopsis enhances drought tolerance by modulating jasmonic acid synthesis. J Exp Bot. 2016; 67: 2829–2845. pmid:27162276
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Sun XM, Zhao TT, Gan SH, Ren XD, Fang LC, Karungo SK, et al. Ethylene positively regulates cold tolerance in grapevine by modulating the expression of ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 057. Sci Rep. 2016; 6.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Yuan YY, Fang LC, Karungo SK, Zhang LL, Gao YY, Li SH, et al. Overexpression of VaPAT1, a GRAS transcription factor from Vitis amurensis, confers abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2016; 35: 655–666. pmid:26687967
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plantarum. 1962; 15: 473–497.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Yoo S D, Cho Y H, Sheen J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc, 2007; 2: 1565–1572. pmid:17585298
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Wang HL, Wang W, Zhan JC, Huang WD, Xu HY. An efficient PEG-mediated transient gene expression system in grape protoplasts and its application in subcellular localization studies of flavonoids biosynthesis enzymes [J]. Sci Hortic, 2015; 191: 82–89.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Mezzetti B, Pandolfini T, Navacchi O, Landi L. Genetic transformation of Vitis vinifera via organogenesis. BMC Biotechnol. 2002; 2: 18. pmid:12354328
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Dhekney SA, Li ZT, Dutt M, Gray DJ. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic cultures and plant regeneration in Vitis rotundifolia Michx.(muscadine grape). Plant Cell Rep. 2008; 27: 865–872. pmid:18256837
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Li ZT, Dhekney S, Dutt M, Aman M, Tattersall J, et al. Optimizing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of grapevine. In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl. 2006; 42: 220–227.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Iocco P, Franks T, Thomas MR. Genetic transformation of major wine grape cultivars of Vitis vinifera L. Transgenic Res. 2001; 10: 105–112. pmid:11305357
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Zottini M, Barizza E, Costa A, Formentin E, Ruberti C, Carimi F, et al. Agroinfiltration of grapevine leaves for fast transient assays of gene expression and for long-term production of stable transformed cells. Plant Cell Rep. 2008; 27: 845–853. pmid:18256839
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Xie X, Agüero CB, Wang Y, Walker MA. Genetic transformation of grape varieties and rootstocks via organogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 2016; 126:541–552.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Zhao FX, Chen SW, Perl A, Dai R, Xu HY, Ma HQ. The Establishment of an Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Platform for the Non-Embryogenic Calli of Vitis vinifera L. Agr Sci China. 2011 10: 686–694.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Bolwell GP, Wojtaszek P. Mechanisms for the generation of reactive oxygen species in plant defence–a broad perspective. Physiol Mol Plant P. 1997; 51: 347–366.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Jaillon O, Aury JM, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature. 2007; 449: 463–467. pmid:17721507
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Troggio M, Cartwright DA, Cestaro A, Pruss D, et al. A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. Plos One. 2007; 2: e1326. pmid:18094749
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Mochida K, Shinozaki K. Advances in omics and bioinformatics tools for systems analyses of plant functions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011; 52:2017–38. pmid:22156726
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Mullins MG, Srinivasan C. Somatic embryos and plantlets from an ancient clone of the grapevine (cv. Cabernet-Sauvignon) by apomixis in vitro. J Exp Bot. 1976; 27:1022–1030.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Gray DJ, Mortensen JA. Initiation and maintenance of long term somatic embryogenesis from anthers and ovaries of Vitis longii ‘Microsperma’. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 1987; 9:73–80.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Martinelli L, Bragagna P, Poletti V, Scienza A. Somatic embryogenesis from leaf and petiole derived callus of Vitis rupestris. Plant Cell Rep. 1993; 12:207–210. pmid:24197021
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] PubMed/NCBI

[10] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Robacker C. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from muscadine grape leaf explants. Hortic Sci. 1993; 28:53–55.
View Article
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Cheng ZM, Reisch BL. Shoot regeneration from petioles and leaves of Vitis × labruscana ‘Catawba’. Plant Cell Rep. 1989; 8:403–406. pmid:24233363
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Salunkhe CK, Rao PS, Mhatre M. Induction of somatic embryogenesis and plantlets in tendrils of Vitis vinifera L. Plant Cell Rep. 1997; 17:65–67.
View Article
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Clog E, Bass P, Walter B. Plant regeneration by organogenesis in Vitis rootstock species. Plant Cell Rep. 1990; 8:726–728. pmid:24232927
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Stamp JA, Colby SM, Meredith CP. Direct shoot organogenesis and plant regeneration from leaves of grape Vitis spp. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 1990; 22:127–133.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Stamp JA, Colby SM, Meredith CP. Improved shoot organogenesis from leaves of grape. J Am Hortic Sci. 1990; 115:1038–1042.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Colby SM, Meredith CP. Kanamycin sensitivity of cultured tissues of Vitis. Plant Cell Rep. 1990; 9: 237–240. pmid:24226816
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] PubMed/NCBI

[34] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Gray DJ. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature zygotic embryos of muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia) cultivars. Am J Bot. 1992; 542–546.
View Article
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Franks T, He DG, Thomas M. Regeneration of transgenic shape Vitis vinifera L. Sultana plants: genotypic and phenotypic analysis. Mol Breeding. 1998; 4: 321–333.
View Article
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Das D, Reddy M, Upadhyaya K, Sopory S. An efficient leaf-disc culture method for the regeneration via somatic embryogenesis and transformation of grape Vitis vinifera L. Plant Cell Rep. 2002; 20: 999–1005.
View Article
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Torregrosa L, Iocco P, Thomas MR. Influence of Agrobacterium strain, culture medium, and cultivar on the transformation efficiency of Vitis vinifera L. Am J Enol Viticult. 2002; 53: 183–190.
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Wang Q, Li P, Hanania U, Sahar N, Mawassi M, Gafny R, et al. Improvement of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation efficiency and transgenic plant regeneration of Vitis vinifera L. by optimizing selection regimes and utilizing cryopreserved cell suspensions. Plant Sci. 2005; 168: 565–571.
View Article
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. López-Pérez AJ, Velasco L, Pazos-Navarro M, Dabauza M. Development of highly efficient genetic transformation protocols for table grape Sugraone and Crimson Seedless at low Agrobacterium density. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2008; 94: 189–199.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Li ZT, Dhekney SA, Dutt M, Gray D. An improved protocol for Agrobacterium- mediated transformation of grapevine Vitis vinifera L. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2008; 93: 311–321.
View Article
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Zhou Q, Dai L, Cheng S, He J, Wang D, Zhang J, et al. A circulatory system useful both for long-term somatic embryogenesis and genetic transformation in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Thompson Seedless. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2014; 118: 157–168.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Ahmed M, Khan N, Hafiz IA, Abbasi NA, Anjum MA, et al. Effect of Various Factors on the Efficiency of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Grape Vitis vinifera L. Vegetos. 2015; 28:171–178.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Harst M, Bornhoff BA, Zyprian E, Töpfer R. Influence of culture technique and genotype on the efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of somatic embryos (Vitis vinifera) and their conversion to transgenic plants. Vitis. 2000; 39:99–102.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Agüero C B, Meredith C P, Dandekar A M. Genetic transformation of Vitis vinifera L. cvs Thompson Seedless and Chardonnay with the pear PGIP and GFP encoding genes. Vitis. 2015; 45: 1.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Vidal JR, Kikkert JR, Malnoy MA, Wallace PG, Barnard J, Reisch BI. Evaluation of transgenic 'Chardonnay' (Vitis vinifera) containing magainin genes for resistance to crown gall and powdery mildew. Transgenic Res. 2006; 15: 69–82. pmid:16475011
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Fan CH, Pu N, Wang XP, Wang YJ, Fang L, Xu WR, et al. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) with a novel stilbene synthase gene from Chinese wild Vitis pseudoreticulata. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2008; 92:197–206.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Tillet RL, Wheatley MD, Tattersall Elizabeth AR, Schlauch KA, Cramer GR, Cushman JC. The Vitis vinifera C-repeat binding protein 4 (VvCBF4) transcriptional factor enhances freezing tolerance in wine grape. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011; 10: 105–124. pmid:21914113
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] PubMed/NCBI

[78] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Fennell A. Freezing tolerance and injury in grapevines. Journal of Crop Improvement. 2004; 10:201–235.
View Article
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Xin HP, Zhu W, Wang LN, Xiang Y, Fang LC, Li GT, et al. Genome wide transcriptional profile analysis of Vitis amurensis and Vitis vinifera in response to cold stress. Plos One. 2013; 8: e58740. pmid:23516547
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] PubMed/NCBI

[85] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Xu WR, Li RM, Zhang NB, Ma FL, Jiao YT, Wang ZP. Transcriptome profiling of Vitis amurensis, an extremely cold-tolerant Chinese wild Vitis species, reveals candidate genes and events that potentially connected to cold stress. Plant Mol Biol. 2014; 86: 527–541. pmid:25190283
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Xu WR, Zhang NB, Jiao YT, Li RM, Xiao DM, Wang ZP. The grapevine basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor positively modulates CBF-pathway and confers tolerance to cold-stress in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Rep. 2014; 41: 5329–5342. pmid:24859977
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Xu WR, Jiao YT, Li RM, Zhang NB, Xiao DM, Ding XL, et al. Chinese wild-growing Vitis amurensis ICE1 and ICE2 encode MYC-type bHLH transcription activators that regulate cold tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plos One. 2014; 9: e102303. pmid:25019620
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Fang LC, Su LY, Sun XM, Li XB, Sun MX, Karungo SK, et al. Expression of Vitis amurensis NAC26 in Arabidopsis enhances drought tolerance by modulating jasmonic acid synthesis. J Exp Bot. 2016; 67: 2829–2845. pmid:27162276
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Sun XM, Zhao TT, Gan SH, Ren XD, Fang LC, Karungo SK, et al. Ethylene positively regulates cold tolerance in grapevine by modulating the expression of ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 057. Sci Rep. 2016; 6.
View Article
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Yuan YY, Fang LC, Karungo SK, Zhang LL, Gao YY, Li SH, et al. Overexpression of VaPAT1, a GRAS transcription factor from Vitis amurensis, confers abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2016; 35: 655–666. pmid:26687967
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plantarum. 1962; 15: 473–497.
View Article
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Yoo S D, Cho Y H, Sheen J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc, 2007; 2: 1565–1572. pmid:17585298
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Wang HL, Wang W, Zhan JC, Huang WD, Xu HY. An efficient PEG-mediated transient gene expression system in grape protoplasts and its application in subcellular localization studies of flavonoids biosynthesis enzymes [J]. Sci Hortic, 2015; 191: 82–89.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Mezzetti B, Pandolfini T, Navacchi O, Landi L. Genetic transformation of Vitis vinifera via organogenesis. BMC Biotechnol. 2002; 2: 18. pmid:12354328
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Dhekney SA, Li ZT, Dutt M, Gray DJ. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic cultures and plant regeneration in Vitis rotundifolia Michx.(muscadine grape). Plant Cell Rep. 2008; 27: 865–872. pmid:18256837
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Li ZT, Dhekney S, Dutt M, Aman M, Tattersall J, et al. Optimizing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of grapevine. In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl. 2006; 42: 220–227.
View Article
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Iocco P, Franks T, Thomas MR. Genetic transformation of major wine grape cultivars of Vitis vinifera L. Transgenic Res. 2001; 10: 105–112. pmid:11305357
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Zottini M, Barizza E, Costa A, Formentin E, Ruberti C, Carimi F, et al. Agroinfiltration of grapevine leaves for fast transient assays of gene expression and for long-term production of stable transformed cells. Plant Cell Rep. 2008; 27: 845–853. pmid:18256839
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Xie X, Agüero CB, Wang Y, Walker MA. Genetic transformation of grape varieties and rootstocks via organogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 2016; 126:541–552.
View Article
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Zhao FX, Chen SW, Perl A, Dai R, Xu HY, Ma HQ. The Establishment of an Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Platform for the Non-Embryogenic Calli of Vitis vinifera L. Agr Sci China. 2011 10: 686–694.
View Article
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Bolwell GP, Wojtaszek P. Mechanisms for the generation of reactive oxygen species in plant defence–a broad perspective. Physiol Mol Plant P. 1997; 51: 347–366.
View Article
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Jaillon O, Aury JM, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature. 2007; 449: 463–467. pmid:17721507
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Troggio M, Cartwright DA, Cestaro A, Pruss D, et al. A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. Plos One. 2007; 2: e1326. pmid:18094749
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Mochida K, Shinozaki K. Advances in omics and bioinformatics tools for systems analyses of plant functions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011; 52:2017–38. pmid:22156726
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Plant material and growth conditions

Selection of suitable explants and kanamycin concentration for transformation

Vector construction

Transformation and generation of transgenic callus from petiole segments

eGFP fluorescence observation

Molecular analysis of transgenic callus lines

Statistical analysis

Results

Selection of suitable types of explants for transformation

Optimal kanamycin concentration of callus formation

Agrobacterium strain

Optimized procedure for Agrobacterium-mediated petiole segment transformation in V. amurensis

Bacterial density.

Infection time.

Co-cultivation.

The eGFP fluorescence observation and molecular analysis of transformants

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The diagram of pSAK277-eGFP vector construction.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References