Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Associations of lipid profiles with insulin resistance and β cell function in adults with normal glucose tolerance and different categories of impaired glucose regulation

  • Shuang Zheng ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Shuang Zheng, Hua Xu, Huan Zhou

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • Hua Xu ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Shuang Zheng, Hua Xu, Huan Zhou

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • Huan Zhou ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Shuang Zheng, Hua Xu, Huan Zhou

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • Xingxing Ren,

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • Tingting Han,

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • Yawen Chen,

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • Huiying Qiu,

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • Peihong Wu,

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • Jun Zheng,

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • Lihua Wang,

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • Wei Liu ,

    amin1031@hotmail.com (YH); sue_liuwei@163.com (WL)

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • Yaomin Hu

    amin1031@hotmail.com (YH); sue_liuwei@163.com (WL)

    Affiliation Department of Endocrinology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Aims

To investigate the associations of dyslipidemia with insulin resistance and β cell function in individuals with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and different categories of impaired glucose regulation (IGR).

Methods

544 subjects (365 with dyslipidemia and/or IGR and 179 with normal lipid and glucose tolerance) were enrolled in the study. All subjects underwent oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). HOMA-IR was used to evaluate insulin sensitivity. Disposition index (DI) was used to evaluate β cell function. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess correlations among lipid profiles, insulin resistance and β cell function.

Results

Among subjects with NGT, those with dyslipidemia had higher level of HOMA-IR but lower level of DI. While among subjects with different categories of IGR, those with dyslipidemia and CGI had significantly decreased DI. No obvious differences of insulin resistance or β cell function were found in IFG or IGT subjects with or without dyslipidemia. TG and HDL-C were correlated with HOMA-IR (β = 0.79, p <0.001; β = -0.38, p = 0.027, respectively, compared with subjects in the low level groups). Moreover, TG and TC were negatively correlated with DI (β = -2.17, p = 0.013; β = -2.01, p = 0.034 respectively, compared with subjects in the low level groups) after adjusting for confounding parameters.

Conclusions

Dyslipidemia induces insulin resistance and impaired β cell response to insulin resistance in individuals with NGT. Furthermore, dyslipidemia diminishes β cell function in subjects with CGI. TG and HDL-C were correlated with insulin resistance, and TG, TC were negatively correlated with β cell response to insulin resistance in non-diabetic individuals.

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), as one of the most common chronic diseases, causes serious morbidity and mortality and also imposes a heavy economic burden in the world [1]. Therefore, it is necessary to identify high-risk individuals and establish a useful primary prevention program for T2DM.

T2DM is frequently accompanied with dyslipidemia, which is known as an independent risk factor of T2DM [2]. However, one question is still partially unraveled: how does dyslipidemia affect diabetes development? In order to answer this question, we should investigate the role of dyslipidemia in β cells function in an early stage, namely non-diabetic subjects. Previous studies have demonstrated the phenomenon that impaired pancreatic β cells function caused by dyslipidemia precedes the manifestation of T2DM [37]. Additionally, the atherogenic lipid pattern is not only apparent in diabetic individuals but also in individuals with NGT [810]. However, few studies have clearly clarified the effects of dyslipidemia on insulin resistance and β cell function in subjects with NGT and different categories of IGR, including impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and combined glucose intolerance (CGI). Besides, the associations of different lipid indices with insulin resistance and β cell function need further investigation in those non-diabetic individuals, which could provide more evidence of the utilization of these lipid indices as potential clinical tools for screening of high-risk individuals.

Thus, the aims of the study were to investigate the effects of dyslipidemia on insulin resistance and β cell function in non-diabetic individuals including those with NGT and different categories of IGR. Subsequently, the correlations of different lipid indices with insulin resistance and β cell function were further explored among those individuals.

Subjects and methods

Subjects

All subjects in this cross-sectional study were recruited from the outpatient clinic of Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University from January 2008 to December 2014. Initially, a total of 724 self-reported non-diabetic subjects aged from 18 to 80 years old were invited to the study and finished structured questionnaires at the first visit. Next, 146 subjects were excluded relying on the exclusion criteria, including pregnancy, hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism, serious diseases like renal or hepatic insufficiency, heart disease, cancer, current history of cigarette smoking or alcohol drinking, taking regular medication for diabetes and/or dyslipidemia. Then, 34 subjects with newly diagnosed diabetes according to the results of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in our study were further excluded. Finally, a total of 544 subjects were enrolled to the recent study. Of these individuals, 365 were patients with dyslipidemia and/or IGR, and 179 were subjects with normal lipid and glucose tolerance.

According to the 1999 World Health Organization criteria [11], NGT was defined as fasting glucose <6.1mmol/L and 2-h glucose < 7.8mmol/L, IFG was defined as fasting glucose between 6.1mmol/L and 7.0mmol/L and 2-h glucose < 7.8mmol/L, IGT was defined as fasting glucose <6.1mmol/L and 2-h glucose between 7.8mmol/L and 11.1mmol/L, CGI was defined as fasting glucose between 6.1mmol/L and 7.0mmol/L and 2-h glucose between 7.8mmol/L and 11.1mmol/L. Dyslipidemia was considered when triglyceride (TG) levels were ≥ 1.7mmol/L and/or total cholesterol (TC) levels ≥ 5.2 mmol/L and/or high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels <1.04 mmol/L and/or low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥ 3.5mmol/L.

Subjects were categorized into normal lipid subgroups (NL) and dyslipidemia subgroups (DL) in both NGT and IGR groups. Additionally, subjects with IGR were further subdivided into IFG, IGT and CGI subgroups.

The study was carried out in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and the study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China. Before the participation, written informed consents were obtained from participants.

Data collection

Anthropometry measurements.

Body height, weight, waist circumference (WC), hip circumference and blood pressure (BP) were measured by trained survey personnel. Body height was measured once with a portable height scale to the nearest 0.1 cm. Weight was measured using a platform digital scale to the nearest 0.1kg. Both height and weight measurements were taken in light clothing without shoes. WC was measured as the midpoint circumference between the iliac crest and the lowest rib. Hip circumference was recorded as the largest gluteal circumference. Circumference measurements were taken twice by a single observer and the mean value was reported. Blood pressure was measured twice in each subject on the right arm after five minutes resting in a sitting position, and the mean of two measurements was considered.

Laboratory analysis.

After a more than 8-hour overnight fast, plasma sample was taken from each subject for the measurement of fasting plasma glucose, fasting insulin and lipids levels. Besides, the blood samples were also obtained at 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after 75 g glucose load (a dose of the standard OGTT) to measure the concentration of glucose and insulin.

Glucose and lipid levels were measured using fully automatic biochemistry analyzer (Hitachi 7600–110 and Hitachi 7020, respectively, Hitachi Co. Tokyo, Japan); insulin concentration was determined by immunoradiometric assay kit (Dainabot, Tokyo, Japan); Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography.

Calculation.

Body mass index (BMI) was defined as the body weight (kg) divided by the square of body height (m2). Waist to hip ratio (WHR) was calculated as waist circumference (cm) divided by hip circumference (cm). Index of insulin resistance (or sensitivity) was calculated from the OGTT data: homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) [HOMA-IR = fasting insulin (μU/ml) × fasting glucose (mmol/L) /22.5]. Disposition index (DI) was used to evaluate β cell function [DI = IGI/HOMA-IR, IGI = insulin in 30 min-fasting insulin (μU/ml)/ Glucose in 30min-fasting glucose (mmol/L)].

Statistical analysis.

All statistical analyses were conducted utilizing SPSS Version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Normality of data was tested applying the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed continuous variables and as median (Interquartile range 25–75%) for skewed variables. Group based differences were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) following SNK post hoc pairwise comparison for normality distributed data and Kruskal-Wallis H test following Mann–Whitney U test for skewed data. Adjusted means were calculated and compared with general linear models. Univariate liner regression analysis was applied to investigate the associations of demographic and clinical characteristics with insulin resistance and β cell function. Multiple liner regression analysis was further conducted to determine the correlations of different lipid indices with insulin resistance and β cell function after controlling potential confounding factors. In this part, all lipid indices were categorized into low level and high level groups according to the clinical diagnostic criteria. And for each indicator, the coefficient β and 95% CIs of the high level group was calculated and compared using the low level group as the reference. Statistical significance was defined as p value <0.05.

Results

Basic characteristics

Anthropometric and metabolic characteristics of the study groups were presented in Table 1. Genders and age were equally represented across different groups. Subjects with dyslipidemia and/or IGR had significantly higher systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, BMI and WHR than those with normal lipid and glucose regulation. Moreover, IGR groups showed higher BMI than NGT groups.

thumbnail
Table 1. Characteristics of the subjects according to glucose tolerance and serum lipid status.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172221.t001

Subjects with dyslipidemia had higher TG, TC and LDL-C levels and lower HDL-C concentrations than those with normal lipid. Notably, IGR/DL group had the worst aforementioned lipid profiles in these groups.

Individuals with dyslipidemia and/or IGR had higher levels of fasting glucose and fasting insulin than NGT/NL group. IGR groups had higher 2-h postload glucose and insulin than NGT groups. Compared with other groups, IGR/DL group had the highest level of HbA1c.

Effects of dyslipidemia on insulin sensitivity and β cell function

Insulin resistance was evaluated by HOMA-IR, which was markedly elevated in patients with dyslipidemia in NGT group (Fig 1A). In addition, patients with dyslipidemia had lower levels of glucose disposition index (DI), especially in NGT and CGI groups (Fig 1B). Thus, subjects with NGT and dyslipidemia had higher insulin resistance and lower β cell function than those with normolipidemia. While subjects with CGI and dyslipidemia had lower β cell function than with normolipidemia.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Insulin resistance and β cell function evaluation in non-diabetic subjects with or without dyslipidemia.

HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance, DI: disposition index, NL: normal lipid, DL: dyslipidemia, NGT: normal glucose tolerance, IFG: impaired fasting glucose, IGT: impaired glucose tolerance, CGI: combined glucose intolerance. *P < 0.05 versus normal lipid (NL) group. Data were expressed as mean ± SD, which were calculated after adjusting for age, sex, SBP, DBP, BMI and WHR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172221.g001

Associations among different lipid indices, insulin sensitivity and β cell function

Correlations between clinical variables and indices of insulin resistance and β cell function, namely HOMA-IR and DI, were evaluated with univariate correlation analysis (Table 2). Age and HDL-C were found to have negative correlations, and SBP, DBP, BMI, WHR and other lipid profiles had positive correlations with HOMA-IR. The SBP, DBP, BMI, WHR and lipid profiles (excluding HDL-C) were negatively correlated with DI.

thumbnail
Table 2. Univariate correlation between HOMA-IR/DI and various parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172221.t002

Subsequently, multiple linear regression analysis was implemented to determine the influence of lipid profiles on HOMA-IR and DI. The results revealed that after adjusting for confounding factors, TG and HDL-C were correlated with HOMA-IR [For TG, adjusted β (95%CIs) of high level group was 0.79 (0.52, 1.06), p <0.001; for HDL-C, adjusted β (95%CIs) of high level group was -0.38 (-0.71, -0.05), p = 0.027] (Table 3). Moreover, TG and TC were negatively correlated with DI after adjusting for SBP, DBP, BMI and WHR [For TG, adjusted β (95%CIs) of high level group was -2.17 (-3.88, -0.46), p = 0.013; for TC, adjusted β (95%CIs) of high level group was -2.01 (-3.86, -0.15), p = 0.034] (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 3. Multiple regression analysis of lipid indices associated with HOMA-IR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172221.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Multiple regression analysis of lipid indices associated with DI.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172221.t004

Discussion

The present study has shown that normal glucose tolerance individuals with dyslipidemia had severe insulin resistance and impaired β cell function. Within IGR groups, dyslipidemia might diminish the compensatory insulin secretion to insulin resistance in subjects with CGI. TG and HDL-C were correlated with insulin resistance, while TG and TC were negatively correlated with pancreatic β cell response to insulin resistance in individuals with NGT and prediabetes.

T2DM has become a major public health problem affecting populations at all levels of socioeconomic development in the world [12, 13]. Dyslipidemia is known as an independent risk factor for the development of T2DM [14]. Chen et al. [15] have found that subjects with hyperlipidemia were more than 3 times higher at risk of developing T2DM compared with participants with normal lipid. However, the influence of dyslipidemia in the process from NGT to diabetes is still obscure.

In the present study, we found that NGT individuals with dyslipidemia had higher HOMA-IR and lower DI levels, which indicated the existence of severe insulin resistance and impaired compensatory response of β cell to insulin resistance.

It is well known that the development of T2DM is characterized by the presence of insulin resistance and progressive decrease of β cell function that is not able to sufficiently compensate for glucose increase [16]. A previous study showed that the transition from NGT to IGR is associated with the deterioration of insulin sensitivity, but glucose tolerance in this process is only mildly impaired because of the compensatory increase in insulin secretion and resultant hyperinsulinemia [17]. However, blood insulin levels should not be equated with β cell function. In general, β cells respond to an incremental change in glucose with an incremental change in insulin, and this response moderated with the severity of insulin resistance. Therefore, disposition index (DI) [ΔI/ΔG ÷ IR] is sound to be more effective on β cell function evaluation. In addition, the DI has been regarded as an accurate assessment of β cell function in previous literature [18] and was used to investigate β cell function in many studies [1921]. In this study, we observed individuals with NGT and dyslipidemia had a significant decline of DI level, which means dyslipidemic patients, even with normal glucose tolerance, have already showed impaired glucose metabolism. Thus, for individuals with dyslipidemia, appropriate preventions should be carried out to prevent the progression from dyslipidemia to prediabetes and diabetes.

To further analyze and compare the effect of dyslipidemia on individuals with IGR, we divided these subjects into three subgroups, i.e. IFG, IGT and CGI. It is noteworthy that isolated IFG and IGT have different pathophysiologies, which have been discussed and still under discussion. In some studies, insulin resistance was the primary abnormity of IGT, while IFG was more associated with insulin secretion [22, 23]. However, other investigators have reported the opposite results [24]. In Japanese and Korean, impaired early-phase insulin secretion plays more important role in isolated IGT, whereas insulin resistance is dominant in isolated IFG subjects [25, 26]. In the present study, we found individuals with CGI had the highest level of insulin resistance, while subjects with IGT had better insulin sensitivity than with IFG. These findings were consistent with results from Novoa et al. [27], which indicated CGI group had the highest levels of insulin resistance, and other studies have also shown that subjects with IFG have increased insulin resistance when compared with IGT group [28, 29].

However, in our study, no significant difference of insulin resistance was found among IFG, IGT and CGI groups with or without dyslipidemia. These may because that HOMA-IR was calculated with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin (FINS). The CGI group had higher levels of fasting glucose and fasting insulin than IGT and IFG groups, and IFG group had higher level of fasting glucose than IGT group (data not shown). But no statistical differences of FPG and FINS were found among IFG, IGT, CGI groups with or without dyslipidemia. These results indicated that dyslipidemia might increase insulin resistance in normoglycemic individuals, while in individuals already have moderate to severe insulin resistance, dyslipidemia seems to have slight influence. A possible explanation is that longtime and severe insulin resistance could result in the decrease of insulin secretion, which may alleviate further deterioration of insulin resistance.

In the current study, we found that both IFG and CGI groups had lower levels of DI than IGT group, and the DI level in CGI subjects with dyslipidemia was significantly declined when compared to those with normal lipid level. These results suggest that IFG subjects have a more prominent defect in β cell function than IGT individuals, which were consistent with the findings from Hong et al. [30]. Moreover, dyslipidemia might injure β cell function of IGR groups, especially the CGI group.

Although it has been demonstrated that dyslipidemia plays a negative role in β cells functions of non-diabetic individuals, the concrete effects of different lipid profiles (TG, TC, HDL-C and LDL-C) on insulin sensitivity and β cell function are still unclear. After multiple linear regression analysis, we found that TG and HDL-C were correlated with insulin resistance, while TG and TC were negatively correlated with pancreatic β cell response to insulin resistance in non-diabetic individuals.

The relationship between high TG and/or low HDL-C levels and T2DM is well known and the American Diabetes Association recommends that adults of any age should be screened for diabetes mellitus if they have a TG levels >250 mg/dL and/or HDL-C levels <35 mg/dL[31]. Moreover, Giannini et al. [32] proposed that the TG to HDL-C ratio is correlated with insulin sensitivity and may be used to identify subjects at high risk of insulin resistance induced death. Several studies have shown that both hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesteromia diminish glucose stimulated insulin secretion by inhibiting glucose oxidation via reducing pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activity and elevating PDH kinase activity [3336]. Moreover, increased TG or TC levels trigger β cell apoptosis by increasing the production of ceramide and nitric oxide [3741]. Our data appear to provide further evidence that TG and TC were closely correlated with pancreatic β cell function in non-diabetic individuals.

Our study may have some limitations. First, although the euglycemic clamp and the intravenous glucose tolerance test are considered as the “gold standard” method to evaluate insulin resistance and pancreatic β cell function, these tests are expensive, time-consuming and not applicable in large epidemiological studies. So we used OGTT to instead of these tests. Second, the pathophysiological basis of impaired glucose regulation may vary in different ethnic study populations. Third, potential bias from daily diet or exercise may exist in the study.

Conclusions

TG and HDL-C were correlated with insulin resistance, and TG, TC were negatively correlated with pancreatic β cell response to insulin resistance in non-diabetic individuals. Subjects with dyslipidemia and NGT have impaired insulin sensitivity and β cell function. Dyslipidemia might diminish pancreatic β cell function in subjects with CGI. Therefore, an early and “aggressive” intervention based on lifestyle changes and insulin sensitizer drugs in subjects with dyslipidemia seems to be recommended because of the high risk of developing T2DM.

Supporting information

S1 File. Clinical datasets.

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172221.s001

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the staff of the Endocrinology and Metabolism Laboratory and the nursing staff for their dedicated assistance in patient sample collection.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: SZ HX HZ.
  2. Data curation: PW JZ LW WL.
  3. Formal analysis: SZ HX HZ.
  4. Funding acquisition: YH.
  5. Investigation: XR TH YC HQ.
  6. Methodology: SZ HX HZ.
  7. Project administration: YH WL.
  8. Resources: PW JZ LW WL.
  9. Software: XR TH YC HQ.
  10. Supervision: YH WL.
  11. Validation: XR TH YC HQ.
  12. Visualization: SZ HX HZ YH.
  13. Writing – original draft: SZ HX HZ.
  14. Writing – review & editing: SZ HX HZ.

References

  1. 1. Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, Xiao J, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1090–101. pmid:20335585
  2. 2. Masters Pedersen J, Hulvej Rod N, Andersen I, Lange T, Poulsen G, Prescott E, et al. Accumulation of Major Life Events in Childhood and Adult Life and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138654. pmid:26394040
  3. 3. Fryirs M, Barter PJ, Rye KA. Cholesterol metabolism and pancreatic beta-cell function. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2009;20(3):159–64. pmid:19417651
  4. 4. von Eckardstein A, Sibler RA. Possible contributions of lipoproteins and cholesterol to the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus type 2. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2011;22(1):26–32. pmid:21102330
  5. 5. Zheng S, Zhou H, Han T, Li Y, Zhang Y, Liu W, et al. Clinical characteristics and beta cell function in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus with different levels of serum triglyceride. BMC Endocr Disord. 2015;15:21. pmid:25924608
  6. 6. Brunisholz KD, Joy EA, Hashibe M, Gren LH, Savitz LA, Hamilton S, et al. Incidental Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus among Patients with Confirmed and Unconfirmed Prediabetes. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0157729. pmid:27427913
  7. 7. Zheng S, Shi S, Ren X, Han T, Li Y, Chen Y, et al. Triglyceride glucose-waist circumference, a novel and effective predictor of diabetes in first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetes patients: cross-sectional and prospective cohort study. J Transl Med. 2016;14:260. pmid:27604550
  8. 8. Sosenko JM, Kato M, Soto R, Goldberg RB. Plasma lipid levels at diagnosis in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 1993;10(9):814–9. pmid:8281725
  9. 9. Baralla A, Sotgiu E, Deiana M, Pasella S, Pinna S, Mannu A, et al. Plasma Clusterin and Lipid Profile: A Link with Aging and Cardiovascular Diseases in a Population with a Consistent Number of Centenarians. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128029. pmid:26076476
  10. 10. Ren L, Cai J, Liang J, Li W, Sun Z. Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Degree of Severity: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144182. pmid:26636669
  11. 11. Colman PG, Thomas DW, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, Garcia-Webb P, Moore MP. New classification and criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The Australasian Working Party on Diagnostic Criteria for Diabetes Mellitus. N Z Med J. 1999;112(1086):139–41. pmid:10340693
  12. 12. Okwechime IO, Roberson S, Odoi A. Prevalence and Predictors of Pre-Diabetes and Diabetes among Adults 18 Years or Older in Florida: A Multinomial Logistic Modeling Approach. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145781. pmid:26714019
  13. 13. Kong X, Zhang X, Xing X, Zhang B, Hong J, Yang W. The Association of Type 2 Diabetes Loci Identified in Genome-Wide Association Studies with Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components in a Chinese Population with Type 2 Diabetes. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143607. pmid:26599349
  14. 14. Deng J, Wu G, Yang C, Li Y, Jing Q, Han Y. Rosuvastatin attenuates contrast-induced nephropathy through modulation of nitric oxide, inflammatory responses, oxidative stress and apoptosis in diabetic male rats. J Transl Med. 2015;13:53. pmid:25880311
  15. 15. Chen GY, Li L, Dai F, Li XJ, Xu XX, Fan JG. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Hyperlipidemia in China. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:2476–84. pmid:26297334
  16. 16. Ohashi K, Komada H, Uda S, Kubota H, Iwaki T, Fukuzawa H, et al. Glucose Homeostatic Law: Insulin Clearance Predicts the Progression of Glucose Intolerance in Humans. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0143880. pmid:26623647
  17. 17. DeFronzo RA, Abdul-Ghani M. Assessment and treatment of cardiovascular risk in prediabetes: impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(3 Suppl):3B–24B. pmid:21802577
  18. 18. Bergman RN, Ader M, Huecking K, Van Citters G. Accurate assessment of beta-cell function: the hyperbolic correction. Diabetes. 2002;51 Suppl 1:S212–20.
  19. 19. Utzschneider KM, Prigeon RL, Faulenbach MV, Tong J, Carr DB, Boyko EJ, et al. Oral disposition index predicts the development of future diabetes above and beyond fasting and 2-h glucose levels. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(2):335–41. pmid:18957530
  20. 20. Retnakaran R, Shen S, Hanley AJ, Vuksan V, Hamilton JK, Zinman B. Hyperbolic relationship between insulin secretion and sensitivity on oral glucose tolerance test. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(8):1901–7.
  21. 21. Chen G, Liu C, Yao J, Jiang Q, Chen N, Huang H, et al. Overweight, obesity, and their associations with insulin resistance and beta-cell function among Chinese: a cross-sectional study in China. Metabolism. 2010;59(12):1823–32. pmid:20655552
  22. 22. Weyer C, Bogardus C, Pratley RE. Metabolic characteristics of individuals with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes. 1999;48(11):2197–203. pmid:10535454
  23. 23. Festa A, D'Agostino R Jr., Hanley AJ, Karter AJ, Saad MF, Haffner SM. Differences in insulin resistance in nondiabetic subjects with isolated impaired glucose tolerance or isolated impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes. 2004;53(6):1549–55. pmid:15161760
  24. 24. Hanefeld M, Koehler C, Fuecker K, Henkel E, Schaper F, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T. Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity pattern is different in isolated impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose: the risk factor in Impaired Glucose Tolerance for Atherosclerosis and Diabetes study. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):868–74. pmid:12610051
  25. 25. Rhee SY, Woo JT, Chon S, Hwang YC, Oh S, Ahn KJ, et al. Characteristics of insulin resistance and insulin secretory capacity in Korean subjects with IFG and IGT. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;89(3):250–5. pmid:20605249
  26. 26. Aoyama-Sasabe S, Fukushima M, Xin X, Taniguchi A, Nakai Y, Mitsui R, et al. Insulin Secretory Defect and Insulin Resistance in Isolated Impaired Fasting Glucose and Isolated Impaired Glucose Tolerance. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:1298601. pmid:26788515
  27. 27. Novoa FJ, Boronat M, Saavedra P, Diaz-Cremades JM, Varillas VF, La Roche F, et al. Differences in cardiovascular risk factors, insulin resistance, and insulin secretion in individuals with normal glucose tolerance and in subjects with impaired glucose regulation: the Telde Study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(10):2388–93. pmid:16186268
  28. 28. Tripathy D, Carlsson M, Almgren P, Isomaa B, Taskinen MR, Tuomi T, et al. Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in relation to glucose tolerance: lessons from the Botnia Study. Diabetes. 2000;49(6):975–80. pmid:10866050
  29. 29. Abdul-Ghani MA, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA. Contributions of beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance to the pathogenesis of impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(5):1130–9. pmid:16644654
  30. 30. Hong J, Gui MH, Gu WQ, Zhang YF, Xu M, Chi ZN, et al. Differences in insulin resistance and pancreatic B-cell function in obese subjects with isolated impaired glucose tolerance and isolated impaired fasting glucose. Diabet Med. 2008;25(1):73–9. pmid:18199133
  31. 31. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33 Suppl 1:S62–9.
  32. 32. Giannini C, Santoro N, Caprio S, Kim G, Lartaud D, Shaw M, et al. The triglyceride-to-HDL cholesterol ratio: association with insulin resistance in obese youths of different ethnic backgrounds. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(8):1869–74. pmid:21730284
  33. 33. Man ZW, Zhu M, Noma Y, Toide K, Sato T, Asahi Y, et al. Impaired beta-cell function and deposition of fat droplets in the pancreas as a consequence of hypertriglyceridemia in OLETF rat, a model of spontaneous NIDDM. Diabetes. 1997;46(11):1718–24. pmid:9356017
  34. 34. Zhou YP, Berggren PO, Grill V. A fatty acid-induced decrease in pyruvate dehydrogenase activity is an important determinant of beta-cell dysfunction in the obese diabetic db/db mouse. Diabetes. 1996;45(5):580–6. pmid:8621007
  35. 35. Hao M, Head WS, Gunawardana SC, Hasty AH, Piston DW. Direct effect of cholesterol on insulin secretion: a novel mechanism for pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction. Diabetes. 2007;56(9):2328–38. pmid:17575085
  36. 36. Li XY, Zhao ZX, Huang M, Feng R, He CY, Ma C, et al. Effect of Berberine on promoting the excretion of cholesterol in high-fat diet-induced hyperlipidemic hamsters. J Transl Med. 2015;13:278. pmid:26310319
  37. 37. Oyadomari S, Takeda K, Takiguchi M, Gotoh T, Matsumoto M, Wada I, et al. Nitric oxide-induced apoptosis in pancreatic beta cells is mediated by the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(19):10845–50. pmid:11526215
  38. 38. Zhang L, Qiao Q, Tuomilehto J, Hammar N, Alberti KG, Eliasson M, et al. Blood lipid levels in relation to glucose status in European men and women without a prior history of diabetes: the DECODE Study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;82(3):364–77. pmid:18922596
  39. 39. Downing LE, Heidker RM, Caiozzi GC, Wong BS, Rodriguez K, Del Rey F, et al. A Grape Seed Procyanidin Extract Ameliorates Fructose-Induced Hypertriglyceridemia in Rats via Enhanced Fecal Bile Acid and Cholesterol Excretion and Inhibition of Hepatic Lipogenesis. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140267. pmid:26458107
  40. 40. De Ita JR, Castilla-Cortazar I, Aguirre GA, Sanchez-Yago C, Santos-Ruiz MO, Guerra-Menendez L, et al. Altered liver expression of genes involved in lipid and glucose metabolism in mice with partial IGF-1 deficiency: an experimental approach to metabolic syndrome. J Transl Med. 2015;13:326. pmid:26467524
  41. 41. Xu F, Liu Y, Shi L, Liu W, Zhang L, Cai H, et al. NADPH oxidase p47phox siRNA attenuates adventitial fibroblasts proliferation and migration in apoE(-/-) mouse. J Transl Med. 2015;13:38. pmid:25628043