Figures
Abstract
MoHrip2 Magnaporthe oryzae hypersensitive protein 2 is an elicitor protein of rice blast fungus M. oryzae. Rice seedlings treated with MoHrip2 have shown an induced resistance to rice blast. To elucidate the mechanism underlying this MoHrip2 elicitation in rice, we used differential-display 2-D gel electrophoresis and qRT-PCR to assess the differential expression among the total proteins extracted from rice leaves at 24 h after treatment with MoHrip2 and buffer as a control. Among ~1000 protein spots detected on each gel, 10 proteins were newly induced, 4 were up-regulated, and 3 were down-regulated in MoHrip2-treated samples compared with the buffer control. Seventeen differentially expressed proteins were detected using MS/MS analysis and categorized into six groups according to their putative function: defense-related transcriptional factors, signal transduction-related proteins, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, programmed cell death (PCD), defense-related proteins, and photosynthesis and energy-related proteins. The qPCR results (relative expression level of genes) further supported the differential expression of proteins in MoHrip2-treated rice leaves identified with 2D-gel, suggesting that MoHrip2 triggers an early defense response in rice leaves via stress-related pathways, and the results provide evidence for elicitor-induced resistance at the protein level.
Citation: Khan NU, Liu M, Yang X, Qiu D (2016) Fungal Elicitor MoHrip2 Induces Disease Resistance in Rice Leaves, Triggering Stress-Related Pathways. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0158112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158112
Editor: Zhengguang Zhang, Nanjing Agricultural University, CHINA
Received: March 13, 2016; Accepted: June 12, 2016; Published: June 27, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Khan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31371984).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Plants are exposed to various groups of pathogenic microorganisms at every stage of growth and have evolved effective defense mechanisms to cope with the encountered microorganisms. They have the ability to distinguish pathogen-derived compounds known as elicitors, mostly composed of lipids, proteins or glycoproteins [1]. Elicitors of the pathogen trigger plant defense responses such as a burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which results in a rapid and highly programmed cell death (PCD) [2], also known as the hypersensitive response (HR) [3], and the generation of nitric oxide (NO), all of which are considered as a signal of innate immunity in plants and the source of resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses [4–6]. Ultimately, elicitors of the pathogen activate plant basal responses, such as the biosynthesis of antimicrobial secondary metabolites (e.g. phytoalexins) and induce the expression of defense-related proteins including pathogenesis-related proteins (PR) [4,7,8]. Consequently, elucidating the mechanism underlying elicitor-induced plant responses is important for understanding plant–pathogen interactions and developing new disease control strategies.
Grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa) can be greatly decreased by abiotic and biotic stresses, including rice blast caused by the fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. The availability of rice genome and proteome databases has now enabled studies in the field of rice proteomics and biological processes including responses to abiotic and biotic stresses [9]. Differentially expressed proteins have been identified in rice leaves and suspension cells treated with blast fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae) and bacteria (Xanthomonas oryzae) [10,11]. Various proteins, including PR proteins (PR5 and PR10) are induced in rice leaves treated with chitosan and fungal or bacterial preparations [12]. Rice cells cultured in suspension containing crude extract of the blast fungus are induced to synthesize PR5, PR10 and the induced proteins that are also induced by salt stress [13]. Several studies have been conducted on elicitor-treated rice seedlings and identified proteins including ROS, PCD, signal transduction and energy-related proteins that are differentially expressed in fungal elicitor-treated rice leaves compared with controls [14,15].
Recently, various types of elicitors have been used to improve plant resistance to pathogens [16–18] by activating different types of defense responses such as signaling pathways, ROS, HR response, NO production, and PCD [19]. MoHrip2, an elicitor protein of the rice blast fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae), can induce HR and the production of NO and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in tobacco leaves. Moreover, rice seedlings treated with MoHrip2 have shown an induced resistance response to conidia of M. oryzae [18]. Defense-related genes, including transcription factors (TFs), salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and PR genes were induced within 24 h (hpt), also SA and JA synthesis was up-regulated in MoHrip2-treated rice seedlings indicating that MoHrip2 induced disease resistance in rice, while activating various stress-related pathways genes (Unpublished data). However, little is known about the mechanism of this induced resistance, which may provide another strategy for controlling rice blast. To begin to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the induction of resistance in rice plants by Mohrip2, analyzing proteins via differential-display 2-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) is therefore crucial.
In the present study, rice cultivar Nipponbare (Oryza sativa spp. japonica) seedlings were treated with the elicitor protein MoHrip2, and then the proteins were analyzed using differential-display 2D-PAGE and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The selected genes that encode the differential-display proteins were also analyzed by qRT-PCR.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Elicitor MoHrip2 Preparation
The recombinant MoHrip2 protein elicitor (NCBI accession AFK29792) was purified as described before [18]. Briefly, E. coli (containing the MoHrip2 gene) was first grown in 50 mL LB broth for 5 to 6 h at 37°C, then 10 mL of this LB broth containing E. coli was transferred to 1 L fresh LB broth for 3 to 4 h of culture at 37°C. Synthesis of the elicitor protein was induced, adding 0.2 mM IPTG (isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside) to the culture, which was then grown overnight at 16°C. MoHrip2 was isolated from 1 L LB broth with a detergent washing method [20]. The MoHrip2 protein was purified on a His-Tag column (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) and desalted on a Millipore column (Merck, Germany). The purified MoHrip2 was quantified with a Bradford assay and confirmed by SDS-PAGE “Fig 1”.
The purified MoHrip2 was run on SDS-PAGE, stained with Coomassie brilliant blue, and shown to be 16 kDa in size compared with the marker (PageRuler Pierce 26616, Thermo Scientific).
2.2. Rice Growth Conditions and Samples Preparation
Sixteen rice (Oryza sativa spp. japonica cv. Nipponbare) plants per pot were grown as described before [20] to the three-leaf stage in a growth chamber at 28 ± 2°C, 75 ± 5% relative humidity, and 14 h light/10 h dark [21]. The plants were sprayed either with MoHrip2 (800 μg/mL of buffer) or with the buffer (50 mM Tris HCl) as a control. After 24 h, one sample (0.5 g leaves) was collected from each of three biological replicates to extract total proteins, and 100 mg leaf tissue was similarly collected after 0, 12, 24, and 48 h to extract total RNA. All samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until use.
2.3. Total Protein Extraction
The leaf sample (0.5 g) was ground to a powder in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle and then dissolved in pre-chilled 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and 0.07% (v/v) 2-mercapto-ethanol (2ME) in acetone, mixed well and incubated overnight at −20°C. After centrifugation (16,000 × g, 20 m at 4°C), the pellet was washed and centrifuged (16000 × g, 20 min at 4°C) three times with pre-chilled 80% (v/v) acetone. The pellet were dissolved with 1.5 mL lysis buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thio urea, 4% CHAPS, 20 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.5) and incubated overnight at room temperature with gentle shaking. After centrifugation (18,000 × g, 1 h at 4°C), the supernatant was transferred to a new tube, the pH was adjusted to 8.5, and the protein concentration was measured using the Bradford method [22]. The crude protein was stored at −80°C until use.
2.4. 2D-PAGE
The 2D-PAGE was done using a standard protocol [23]. The protein sample (1000 μg/mL) was purified using a 2-D gel clean up kit (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and subsequently dissolved in 450 μL loading buffer (8 M urea, 2% w/v CHAPS, 0.5% v/v IPG buffer, 40 mM dithiothreitol (DDT), and 0.002% bromophenol blue). Isoelectric focusing (IEF) was performed at (30 V for 6 h, 60 V for 6 h, 200 V for 1 h, 500 V for 1 h, 1000 V for 1 h, 8000 V for 2.30 h, 8000 V for 7 h, and 500 V for 5–20 h), at 20°C for a total of 65,000–70,000 VH, using linear 24 cm strips (pH 4–7) in an IPGphore system (GE Healthcare). Vertical SDS-PAGE (12%) was run at a constant wattage (2 W per strip for 45 m, 9 W per strip for 10 h) and was stained with Coomassie blue G-250 (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
2.5. Gel Scanning and Differential Display Protein Analysis
The gels were scanned using an image scanner II (GE Healthcare) at 300 dpi resolution, and the images were saved as TIF. The images were then analyzed with Image Master 5.0 software (GE Healthcare). Spots were detected, measured and the background was subtracted according to the software instructions (GE Healthcare). The spots were matched using an automatic method and were carefully edited using the software 5.0 users instructions (GE Healthcare). Subsequently, two groups were created as the control and treated gels of the corresponding three biological replicates. Spot volumes were quantitatively analyzed. The differential-display proteins were identified based on the criteria that (i) the differential spots were reproduced in three replicates and (ii) spot volumes differed at least two-folds.
2.6. MS/MS Detection and Database Search
Protein spots were cut from the gel, in-gel digested with trypsin, and protein was extracted as described previously [24]. Briefly, C18-ZipTips (Millipore Billerica MA, USA) were used for MALDI target preparation according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The peptides were desalted, concentrated and eluted onto the MALDI target using α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) solution (100 pmol/μL). The peptide mass fingerprint (PMF) was analyzed for each sample and processed using DataExplore software (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) provided with the equipment. The data were analyzed using the Mascot (http://proteometrics.com/protocol-cgi/profound.exe). The following mass spectrometry parameters were selected for the database search: the spectra were recorded in a mass range of 800 to 4000 Da; the error range of the apparent isoelectric point was 60.5 pH; the error range of the apparent molecular weight was 620%; fixed cysteine modification with carbamidomethyl; samples were derived from Oryza; allowed nonrestriction sites was 1; minimum matching peptide fragments was 5; trypsin fragments were run with a mass tolerance of 200 ppm; mass values were MH+. The proteins were identified based on the search results and the Ip and MW values in the gel.
2.7. Total RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from control and treated rice samples using an EasyPure Plant RNA Extraction Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of RNA was measured using an Eppendorf BioPhotometer plus. Approximately, 500 ng RNA for each sample was reverse transcribed using All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Super Mix for qPCR (TransGen Biotech). Primers were designed using the online NCBI primer blast software according to the gene sequences in the GeneBank database “Table 1”. OsActin was used as an internal control [25]. The qRT-PCR was performed in a Bio-Rad iCycler iQ5 using TransStart Green qPCR Mix UDG (TransGen Biotech), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, each 20 μL reaction volume contained 2 μL cDNA, 10 μL qPCR mix, 0.5 μL of each primer (10 mM) and 7 μL ddH2O. The following thermal conditions were used: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation (20 s at 94°C), annealing (30 s at 60°C) and extension (30 s at 72°C). The melt curves were run immediately after the last PCR cycle to measure the influence of induction. The qPCR was performed in three biological replicates. Induction of gene expression was assessed using delta–delta method [26]. The results were analyzed using the One-way ANOVA with Tukey post test using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego California USA, www.graphpad.com.
3. Results
3.1. Differential-Display Proteins after Treatment with MoHrip2
About 1000 protein spots were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 and detected using Image Master 5.0 software (GE Healthcare) on each gel for MoHrip2-treated or buffer-treated samples. Two representative gels “Fig 2” and one for each differential-display protein spot for newly induced, up- and down-regulated are shown “Fig 3”. Both gels are of high quality and suited for analyzing the differentially expressed proteins. Using the differential-display criteria, expression changes in 17 proteins were detected using Image Master 5.0 software (GE Healthcare) at 24 hpt: 10 (N1–N10) were newly induced “Fig 4A”, four (U1–U4) were up-regulated and three (D1–D3) were down-regulated “Fig 4B”.
Representative 2-DE patterns of proteins from rice leaves (2nd and 3rd leaves) inoculated with 50 mM Tris HCl as a control (C) or the elicitor MoHrip2 (800 μg/mL) (T). Total extracted proteins (1000 μg) were loaded on 24 cm IPG strip (GE Healthcare) with a linear gradient of pH 4–7 for IEF, following electrophoresis of 12% SDS-PAGE and Coomassie (G-250) staining. Arrows on the gel indicate the positions of newly induced (N1–N10), up-regulated (U1–U4) and down-regulated (D1–D3) proteins compared with proteins in the control. The H and L on the left indicate separation of proteins from high to low molecular weight.
Close-up views of the proteins spots of the 2-DE gels that show significant differences in protein expression between controls (C) and treated (T) rice leaves. Proteins (1000 μg) were loaded on 24 cm IPG strip with a linear gradient of pH 4–7 for IEF, following electrophoresis of 12% SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining for data analysis. Spots were detected using software 7.0 (GE Healthcare) in three replicated gels.
Changes in protein spots were calculated using Image-Master 5.0 software (GE Healthcare) and plotted as the relative spot volume of 17 spots indicated in Fig 2. Values are the actual volumes of the proteins spots from three independent experiments. Unshaded (control) and shaded bars (treated) represent variation in spots volume, up- (U) and downregulated (D) spots (Fig 4A) and newly induced (N) proteins (Fig 4B). Error bars indicate ±SEM; essentially identical results were obtained for each spot in three independent experiments. The asterisks *, ** and *** indicate significant difference at (p = 0.05, p = 0.01 and p = 0.001, t-test), respectively as compared to controls (4A). The newly induced proteins (4B) are significant as the control values are zero.
3.2. Identification of Differential-Display Proteins by MS/MS Analysis
The differential-display proteins from the gels with MoHrip2-treated proteins were excised and analyzed by MS/MS. These 17 differential-display proteins “Table 2”, with the exception of two uncharacterized proteins (N1 and N3), were allotted to six groups according to their putative function: (i) defense-related transcriptional factor (N2), (ii) signal transduction-related proteins (N4, N7, N9), (iii) reactive oxygen species (ROS) (N5, D1, D2, D3), (iv) programmed cell death (PCD) (N6), (v) defense-related proteins (N10 and U4), and (vi) photosynthesis and energy-related proteins (N8, U1, U2, U3).
3.3. qRT-PCR Analysis of Differential-Display Proteins
Four proteins, two newly induced (N5 and N10) and one up-regulated (U4) and one down-regulated (D3), were analyzed with qRT-PCR over time (0–48 h after treatment, hpt). Expression levels of genes encoding the associated proteins were changed within 12 hpt “Fig 5A–5D”, which further supported the differential-display proteins identified with the 2-D gel.
Relative expression (±SEM) is the fold-change at the given hours post treatment (hpt) compared with the control. Relative expression was analyzed by using quantitative RT-PCR, and expression levels were normalized to those of the actin gene as a housekeeping gene. OsGLP (5A) and OsPR5 (5B) represent newly induced, OsPR10 (5C) upregulated and OsDnK (5D) represent downregulated proteins. Error bars indicate ±SEM; essentially identical results were obtained for each gene in three independent experiments. The asterisks * and ** indicate significance (p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, ANOVA), respectively.
4. Discussion
To answer the immediate need to protect rice production by deploying durable resistance and novel strategies against various diseases, a variety of transgenic rice cultivars and pathogen elicitors have been developed [1,27–29]. Several PR plant defense proteins have been identified that are induced in response to pathogen attack and treatment with an elicitor protein [30]. Our results here suggest that the expression of defense-related proteins including PR proteins can be modulated in rice leaves by treatment with the elicitor protein MoHrip2.
4.1. ROS and PCD-Related Proteins
In our study ROS and PCD-related proteins such as germin like protein (GLP) (N5), senescence activated gene 12 (SAG12) (N6) were newly induced, and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (D1), protein disulfide isomerase (D2), and dnaK (D3) proteins were downregulated in MoHrip2-treated samples compared with the control. GLPs have superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and protect plants from oxidative stresses induced by abiotic and biotic factors [31] by breaking down superoxide anions, thus generating H2O2, which acts as an early signaling molecule for downstream defense responses and a defense response molecule against invading pathogens [32]. After exogenous treatment with H2O2, rice seedlings accumulated proteins relating to redox homeostasis, which maintain the redox status of the plant cell by activating defense reactions or overcoming the deleterious effects of oxidative stresses, and some of these redox enzymes might be repressed to maintain the concentration of H2O2 [33,34]. In our study, the dnaK heat shock proteins and isomerases were down-regulated in elicitor-treated plants compared with the buffer controls, which might account for H2O2 accumulation in rice leaves treated with MoHrip2. Besides, isomerases and dnaK proteins regulate protein folding and prevent protein denaturation [35]. The dnaK-type chaperones also known as heat shock proteins that play an important role in refolding of proteins that are denatured during stresses [36].
4.2. Transcriptional and Signal Transduction-Related Proteins
The zinc finger protein (ZFP) (N2), associated with defense-related transcriptional factor, and tricin synthase 1 (N4), SP3D (N7), and farnesyl transferase (N9), that are linked with signal transduction pathways, were newly induced in treated plants but not in the controls. Tricin synthase 1 catalyzes the methylation of tricitin, an important flavonoid, and binds to S-adenosyl-l-methionine, important steps in the synthesis of SA, JA and other polyamines [37]. ZFPs are cold- and drought-responsive proteins in plants [38]. Overexpression of ZFP245 enhances the activity of ROS-related enzymes and rice seedling resistance to oxidative stress [39]. SP3D and farnesyl transferase proteins negatively regulate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and the abscisic acid (ABA) pathway, respectively [16,40]. The MAPK pathway regulates the activity of various transcription factors, such as WRKY, and enzymes such as protein kinases, and ultimately regulates the induction of PR proteins [16]. The ABA pathway is mostly related to developmental processes and abiotic resistance in plants [41]. Exogenous application of ABA, however, can also enhance plant susceptibility to fungal and bacterial diseases, while a mutation that causes ABA deficiency induces an enhanced resistance in tomato and Arabidopsis [42,43]. ABA has also been confirmed to interact antagonistically with the salicylic acid (SA) pathway [44]. Recently, we identified some marker genes related to the SA and JA pathways that were induced in MoHrip2-treated rice seedling (Unpublished data), suggesting that MoHrip2 might induce disease resistance in rice via the SA- or JA-related pathway. Further confirmation is needed to prove that MoHrip2-induced resistance in rice is a consequence of these defense-related pathways.
4.3. PR Proteins
PR proteins are distinguishing entities for system acquired resistance (SAR) in plants [45]. In our study, thaumatin-like protein (TLP, PR5) (N10) and PR10 (U4) proteins were induced in treated rice seedlings but not in the control. PR5 and PR10 are biomarkers of resistance against abiotic and biotic stresses [46]. Overexpression of PR5 proteins in susceptible rice cultivar enhances disease resistance against the bacterium Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and the fungus Rhizoctonia solani [47,48]. PR5 and PR10 proteins are also up-regulated in rice leaves treated with M. oryzae, X. oryzae, chitosan, and fungal elicitor [13–15,47].
4.4. Photosynthesis and Energy-Related Proteins
Four additional proteins that were identified “Table 2” in MoHrip2-treated samples were associated with photosynthesis and energy-related proteins, including the large subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBisCO) (U1), magnesium binding proteins (U2 and U3) and ATP binding protein 4-coumaroyl-CoA synthase 5 (N8). ATP binding protein 4-coumaroyl-CoA synthase 5 is a nitrogen-responsive protein and also induced by wounding [49]. Several reports described the effect of nitrogen concentrations (low or high) on the proteome of rice roots and leaves [49,50], and several energy-related proteins, including 4-coumaroyl-CoA synthase 5, are induced in response to nitrogen levels [35].
The level of the crucial photosynthetic enzyme RuBisCO is reduced in rice leaves treated with M. oryzae, and X. oryzae, because pathogen infection degrades the chloroplast [51]. Changes in the concentration Mg+2, the central atom of chlorophyll, in chloroplasts regulate the function of photosynthetic enzymes [52]. In our study, RuBisCO and magnesium ion (Mg+2) binding proteins were induced in elicitor-treated rice seedlings and might be strengthening the resistance induced by MoHrip2 in rice leaves against M. oryzae.
4.5. Conclusion
Using a proteomics approach to elucidate the effects of MoHrip2 in triggering the rice defense system, we identified differentially expressed proteins in rice leaves at 24 h after treatment with the elicitor MoHrip2. MoHrip2 induced rice basal defense responses such as ROS, PCD and defense-related proteins. ROS serves as an early precursor during biotic and abiotic stresses, while triggering defense-related pathways downstream in plants. Moreover, the up-regulation of photosynthesis and energy-related proteins further supports MoHrip2-induced defense in rice, which might be helpful in stress relief. Studies are now needed to identify a host receptor for MoHrip2 in rice leaves to elucidate the mechanism of MoHrip2-induced resistance in rice.
Acknowledgments
We thank Beth E. Hazen for carefully reviewing the manuscript and editing the English. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31371984).
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: DWQ XFY. Performed the experiments: NUK. Analyzed the data: NUK DWQ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MJL. Wrote the paper: NUK DWQ.
References
- 1. Garcia-Brugger A, Lamotte O, Vandelle E, Bourque S, Lecourieux D, Poinssot B, et al. Early signaling events induced by elicitors of plant defenses. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19: 711–724. pmid:16838784
- 2. Lam E, Kato N, Lawton M. Programmed cell death, mitochondria and the plant hypersensitive response. Nature. 2001;411: 848–853. pmid:11459068
- 3. Greenberg JT, Yao N. The role and regulation of programmed cell death in plant-pathogen interactions. Cell Microbiol. 2004;6: 201–211. pmid:14764104
- 4. Zhao J, Davis LC, Verpoorte R. Elicitor signal transduction leading to production of plant secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv. 2005;23: 283–333. pmid:15848039
- 5. Bright J, Desikan R, Hancock JT, Weir IS, Neill SJ. ABA-induced NO generation and stomatal closure in Arabidopsis are dependent on H2O2 synthesis. Plant J. 2006;45: 113–22. pmid:16367958
- 6. Grün S, Lindermayr C, Sell S, Durner J. Nitric oxide and gene regulation in plants. J Exp Bot. 2006;57: 507–516. pmid:16396997
- 7. Jwa N-S, Agrawal GK, Tamogami S, Yonekura M, Han O, Iwahashi H, et al. Role of defense/stress-related marker genes, proteins and secondary metabolites in defining rice self-defense mechanisms. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2006;44: 261–273. pmid:16806959
- 8. Wei T, Ou B, Li J, Zhao Y, Guo D, Zhu Y, et al. Transcriptional Profiling of Rice Early Response to Magnaporthe oryzae Identified OsWRKYs as Important Regulators in Rice Blast Resistance. Xu M, editor. PLoS One. 2013;8: e59720. pmid:23544090
- 9. Martin GB, Bogdanove AJ, Sessa G. Understanding the functions of plant disease resistance proteins. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54: 23–61. pmid:14502984
- 10. Sun TK, Sang GK, Du HH, Sun YK, Han JK, Byung HL, et al. Proteomic analysis of pathogen-responsive proteins from rice leaves induced by rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe grisea. Proteomics. 2004;4: 3569–3578. pmid:15478215
- 11. Hou M, Xu W, Bai H, Liu Y, Li L, Liu L, et al. Characteristic expression of rice pathogenesis-related proteins in rice leaves during interactions with Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Plant Cell Rep. 2012;31: 895–904. pmid:22187088
- 12. Rakwal R, Tamogami S, Agrawal GK, Iwahashi H. Octadecanoid signaling component “burst” in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling leaves upon wounding by cut and treatment with fungal elicitor chitosan. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;295: 1041–5. S0006291X02007799. pmid:12135598
- 13. Koga H, Dohi K, Nishiuchi T, Kato T, Takahara H, Mori M, et al. Proteomic analysis of susceptible rice plants expressing the whole plant-specific resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae: Involvement of a thaumatin-like protein. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. Elsevier Ltd; 2012;77: 60–66.
- 14. Kim ST, Cho KS, Yu S, Kim SG, Hong JC, Han CD, et al. Proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins induced by rice blast fungus and elicitor in suspension-cultured rice cells. Proteomics. 2003;3: 2368–2378. pmid:14673787
- 15. Liao M, Li Y, Wang Z. Identification of elicitor-responsive proteins in rice leaves by a proteomic approach. Proteomics. 2009;9: 2809–2819. pmid:19405028
- 16. Dodds PN, Rathjen JP. Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant-pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Genet. Nature Publishing Group; 2010;11: 539–548.
- 17. Xie K, Chen J, Wang Q, Yang Y. Direct Phosphorylation and Activation of a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase by a Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase in Rice. Plant Cell. 2014;26: 3077–3089. pmid:25035404
- 18. Chen M, Zhang C, Zi Q, Qiu D, Liu W, Zeng H. A novel elicitor identified from Magnaporthe oryzae triggers defense responses in tobacco and rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2014;33: 1865–1879. pmid:25056480
- 19. Kuroda K, Sasaki K, Iwai T, Yazaki Y, Hiraga S, Seo S, et al. Rapid defense gene expression in both resistant and susceptible rice cultivars by elicitor(s) originating from conidia of blast fungus-Basal resistance response before fungal penetration into host cells. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2006;69: 13–25.
- 20. Chen M, Zeng H, Qiu D, Guo L, Yang X, Shi H, et al. Purification and Characterization of a Novel Hypersensitive Response-Inducing Elicitor from Magnaporthe oryzae that Triggers Defense Response in Rice. Lee Y-H, editor. PLoS One. 2012;7: e37654. pmid:22624059
- 21. Kuwagata T, Ishikawa-Sakurai J, Hayashi H, Nagasuga K, Fukushi K, Ahamed A, et al. Influence of low air humidity and low root temperature on water uptake, growth and aquaporin expression in rice plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53: 1418–1431. pmid:22685088
- 22. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72: 248–254. pmid:942051
- 23. Görg a. 2-D electrophoresis: Principles and Methods. GE Healthcare Handbook. 2004; 27–32.
- 24. Patel PS, Telang SD, Rawal RM, Shah MH. A review of proteomics in cancer research. Asian Pacific J cancer Prev. 2005;6: 113–117.
- 25. Ruan W, Lai M. Actin, a reliable marker of internal control? Clinica Chimica Acta. 2007. pp. 1–5.
- 26. Sharma N, Rahman MH, Strelkov S, Thiagarajah M, Bansal VK, Kav NN V. Proteome-level changes in two Brassica napus lines exhibiting differential responses to the fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicae. Plant Sci. 2007;172: 95–110.
- 27. Li W, Zhong S, Li G, Li Q, Mao B, Deng Y, et al. Rice RING protein OsBBI1 with E3 ligase activity confers broad-spectrum resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae by modifying the cell wall defence. Cell Res. Nature Publishing Group; 2011;21: 835–848.
- 28. Liu Y, Liu B, Zhu X, Yang J, Bordeos A, Wang G, et al. Fine-mapping and molecular marker development for Pi56(t), a NBS-LRR gene conferring broad-spectrum resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae in rice. Theor Appl Genet. 2013;126: 985–998. pmid:23400829
- 29. Obara N, Hasegawa M, Kodama O. Induced volatiles in elicitor-treated and rice blast fungus-inoculated rice leaves. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2002;66: 2549–2559. pmid:12596847
- 30. Van Loon LC, Rep M, Pieterse CMJ. Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2006;44: 135–162. pmid:16602946
- 31. Breen J, Bellgard M. Germin-like proteins (GLPs) in cereal genomes: Gene clustering and dynamic roles in plant defence. Funct Integr Genomics. 2010;10: 463–476. pmid:20683632
- 32. Woo EJ, Dunwell JM, Goodenough PW, Marvier AC, Pickersgill RW. Germin is a manganese containing homohexamer with oxalate oxidase and superoxide dismutase activities. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7: 1036–1040. pmid:11062559
- 33. Delaunois B, Jeandet P, Clément C, Baillieul F, Dorey S, Cordelier S. Uncovering plant-pathogen crosstalk through apoplastic proteomic studies. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5: 249. pmid:24917874
- 34. Wan X-Y, Liu J-Y. Comparative proteomics analysis reveals an intimate protein network provoked by hydrogen peroxide stress in rice seedling leaves. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7: 1469–1488. pmid:18407957
- 35. Kim ST, Kim SG, Agrawal GK, Kikuchi S, Rakwal R. Rice proteomics: A model system for crop improvement and food security. Proteomics. 2014;14: 593–610. pmid:24323464
- 36. Zang X, Komatsu S. A proteomics approach for identifying osmotic-stress-related proteins in rice. Phytochemistry. 2007;68: 426–437. pmid:17169384
- 37. Baldrich P, Campo S, Wu M-T, Liu T-T, Hsing Y-IC, Segundo BS. MicroRNA-mediated regulation of gene expression in the response of rice plants to fungal elicitors. RNA Biol. 2015; 00–00.
- 38. Xu D-Q, Huang J, Guo S-Q, Yang X, Bao Y-M, Tang H-J, et al. Overexpression of a TFIIIA-type zinc finger protein gene ZFP252 enhances drought and salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). FEBS Lett. 2008;582: 1037–1043. pmid:18325341
- 39. Huang J, Sun SJ, Xu DQ, Yang X, Bao YM, Wang ZF, et al. Increased tolerance of rice to cold, drought and oxidative stresses mediated by the overexpression of a gene that encodes the zinc finger protein ZFP245. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;389: 556–561.
- 40. Manavalan LP, Chen X, Clarke J, Salmeron J, Nguyen HT. RNAi-mediated disruption of squalene synthase improves drought tolerance and yield in rice. J Exp Bot. 2012;63: 163–175. pmid:21926092
- 41. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57: 781–803. pmid:16669782
- 42. Achuo EA, Prinsen E, Höfte M. Influence of drought, salt stress and abscisic acid on the resistance of tomato to Botrytis cinerea and Oidium neolycopersici. Plant Pathol. 2006;55: 178–186.
- 43. de Torres-Zabala M, Truman W, Bennett MH, Lafforgue G, Mansfield JW, Rodriguez Egea P, et al. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato hijacks the Arabidopsis abscisic acid signalling pathway to cause disease. EMBO J. 2007;26: 1434–43. pmid:17304219
- 44. Jiang C-J, Shimono M, Sugano S, Kojima M, Yazawa K, Yoshida R, et al. Abscisic acid interacts antagonistically with salicylic acid signaling pathway in rice-Magnaporthe grisea interaction. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010;23: 791–798. pmid:20459318
- 45. Edreva A. Pathogenesis-Related Proteins : Research progress in the last 15 years. Gen Appl Plant Physiol. 2005;31: 105–124.
- 46. Agrawal GK, Rakwal R. Rice proteomics: A cornerstone for cereal food crop prqteqmes. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2006;25: 1–53.
- 47. Mahmood T, Jan A, Komatsu S. Proteomic analysis of bacterial blight defence signalling pathway using transgenic rice overexpressing thaumatin-like protein. Biol Plant. 2009;53: 285–293.
- 48. Datta K, Velazhahan R, Oliva N, Ona I, Mew T, Khush GS, et al. Over-expression of the cloned rice thaumatin-like protein (PR-5) gene in transgenic rice plants enhances environmental friendly resistance to Rhizoctonia solani causing sheath blight disease. Theor Appl Genet. 1999;98: 1138–1145.
- 49. Ding C, You J, Liu Z, Rehmani MIA, Wang S, Li G, et al. Proteomic Analysis of Low Nitrogen Stress-Responsive Proteins in Roots of Rice. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2011;29: 618–625.
- 50. Hakeem KR, Chandna R, Ahmad A, Qureshi MI, Iqbal M. Proteomic analysis for low and high nitrogen-responsive proteins in the leaves of rice genotypes grown at three nitrogen levels. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;168: 834–850. pmid:22903322
- 51. Fan W, Cui W, Li X, Chen S, Liu G, Shen S. Proteomics analysis of rice seedling responses to ovine saliva. J Plant Physiol. Elsevier GmbH.; 2011;168: 500–509.
- 52. Shaul O. Magnesium transport and function in plants: the tip of the iceberg. Biometals. 2002;15: 309–323. pmid:12206396