Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Intersubtype Reassortments of H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses Isolated from Quail

  • Tinh Huu Nguyen,

    Affiliations Department of Microbiology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Central Vietnam Veterinary Institute, Nha Trang, Vietnam

  • Van Thai Than,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

  • Hien Dang Thanh,

    Affiliations Department of Microbiology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Central Vietnam Veterinary Institute, Nha Trang, Vietnam

  • Vu-Khac Hung,

    Affiliation Central Vietnam Veterinary Institute, Nha Trang, Vietnam

  • Duc Tan Nguyen,

    Affiliation Central Vietnam Veterinary Institute, Nha Trang, Vietnam

  • Wonyong Kim

    kimwy@cau.ac.kr

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Abstract

H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses are considered a threat to national animal industries, causing production losses and high mortality in domestic poultry. In recent years, quail has become a popular terrestrial poultry species raised for production of meat and eggs in Asia. In this study, to better understand the roles of quail in H5N1 viral evolution, two H5N1-positive samples, designated A/quail/Vietnam/CVVI-49/2010 (CVVI-49/2010) and A/quail/Vietnam/CVVI-50/2014 (CVVI-50/2014), were isolated from quail during H5N1 outbreaks in Vietnam, and their whole genome were analyzed. The phylogenetic analysis reveals new evolutionary variation in the worldwide H5N1 viruses. The quail HA genes were clustered into clades 1.1.1 (CVVI-49/2010) and clade 2.3.2.1c (CVVI-50/2014), which may have evolved from viruses circulating from chickens and/or ducks in Cambodia, mainland of China, Taiwan, Indonesia, and South Korea in recent years. Interestingly, the M2 gene of the CVVI-49/2010 strain contained amino acid substitutions at position 26L-I and 31S-N that are related to amantadine-resistance. In particular, the CVVI-50/2014 strain revealed evidence of multiple intersubtype reassortment events between virus clades 2.3.2.1c, 2.3.2.1b, and 2.3.2.1a. Data from this study supports the possible role of quail as an important intermediate host in avian influenza virus evolution. Therefore, additional surveillance is needed to monitor these HPAI viruses both serologically and virologically in quail.

Introduction

Avian influenza viruses (AIV) belong to the Orthomyxoviridae family. The viral genome consists of eight segments of single-stranded negative RNA, encoding at least 10 well-described functional proteins (PB1, PB2, PA, HA, NP, NA, M1, M2, NS1, and NS2), and five recently identified functional proteins (PB1-F2, PB1-N40, PA-X, PA-N155, and PA-N182) [1]. Hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) are surface antigenic proteins that play a major role in the host humoral immune response against these viruses [2]. Based on the presence of HA and NA antigens, influenza A viruses are divided into H and N subtypes. To date, 18 HA (H1–H18) and 11 NA (N1–N11) subtypes have been identified in aquatic fowls and bats [3]. This suggests the possibility of genetic reassortment containing different combinations of these genes are possible and result in generating new HN subtypes [1,3].

AIVs cause various pathologies in infected birds, ranging from clinically inapparent, to mild illness, to high fatality. Based on the pathogenicity, AIVs are classified into low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) and highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses [4]. Of these, only small number of subtypes H5 and H7 are considered HPAI viruses that cause high mortality in wild birds and domestic poultry worldwide [2,4].

An HPAI H5N1 virus was first identified in 1996 in domestic geese in Guangdong province, China [5]. Since then, the virus has spread rapidly to many other countries in Asia, Europe, and Africa, with major economic repercussions due to millions of poultry deaths, including those from culling procedures [6]. The HPAI H5N1 viruses have diversified into nine distinct clades (clades 0–9) and a large number of subclades. In 2008, clades 0, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, and several subclades from clade 2 were not detected [7]. By 2014, clades 1, subclades 2.1.3, 2.2, 2.2.1, 2.3.2, 2.3.4, and clade 7 had expanded worldwide, despite efforts to control the viruses [8]. Viruses from subclade 2.3.2 have emerged in parts of Asia, including mainland of China, Vietnam, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Laos, Bangladesh, Nepal, Mongolia, and the Tyva Republic; and in eastern Europe, particularly in Bulgaria and Romania [7].

Aquatic birds are known to be the natural reservoirs of influenza A viruses. The HA subtype H1–H16, and NA subtypes N1–N9, and most of their combinations have been identified from aquatic birds [9,10]. In addition, quail have been identified as the most important intermediate hosts of AIVs in recent years because they express both SAα-2,3-linked and SAα-2,6-linked receptors for mammalian and avian influenza A viruses on their epithelial cell surfaces [11,12]. In vivo experiments have shown that the respiratory tracts of quail can support the replication of a broad range of influenza viruses, including 14 HA subtypes (H1–H14) from aquatic birds, human-like H1N1 virus, and swine H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2 viruses [13]. In nature, quail can be infected with numerous influenza virus subtypes, including AIV subtypes H3 to H7, H9, and H10; human H1N1 virus; and swine H3N2 viruses [11,14]. HPAI H5N1 surveillance studies have shown that quail are infected with HPAI H5N1 viruses in many regions of Asia, including mainland of China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, South Korea, Thailand, and Vietnam, where quail are often found intermingling with other poultry in live bird markets [1520]. Whole genomic characterization of the three quail HPAI H5N1 clade 4 viruses identified in China indicated that quail may play a role in the evolution of AIVs, because of their ability to be infected by and to transmit H5N1 viruses among poultry, wild birds, and humans [21].

Vietnam is a tropical country that is located on the eastern margin of the Indochinese Peninsula. Agriculture plays a critical role in the national economy, and animal production contributes about 32% to the total agricultural gross domestic product. Since their first detection in 2001, HPAI H5N1 viruses continue to be highly contagious, affecting a large number of wild birds and domestic poultry in this country in recent years [22,23]. HPAI H5N1 viruses in Vietnam have been classified into several genetic groups. Although some H5N1 clades disappear a short time after their emergence, two major clades, clade 1 and clade 2, are still in circulation. Many subclades of clades 1 and 2 have subsequently been identified in poultry [2427]. Studies have shown that, by 2012, clade 1.1 viruses were dominant among AIVs circulating in southern Vietnam, while viruses isolated from influenza cases in the northern and other regions belonged to clade 2.3.2.1 [28,29].

Quail is a popular terrestrial domestic poultry species raised for meat and eggs in Vietnam. HPAI H5N1 viruses were identified in infected quail in 2004–2005 in the Kien Giang and Tra Vinh provinces in the southern region of Vietnam [30]. However, they have not been fully genetically or phylogenetically characterized. Interestingly, in Vietnam, quails are usually maintained by natural poultry farming practices (e.g., backyard or grazing frame methods) that may contribute to the persistence and spread of influenza viruses throughout the country. In this study, the full genomes of two HPAI H5N1 virus strains isolated from H5N1 outbreaks on quail farms in Khanh Hoa province in 2010 and 2014, a south-central region of Vietnam were characterized in order to determine the genetic relatedness of these strains to reference AIV strains and to describe the possible role of quail in the evolution of AIVs in Vietnam.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Data in this study were obtained from case-investigation reports at the Central Vietnam Veterinary Institute (CVVI), Nha Trang, Vietnam and being reported to the authorities. The accurate poultry farm information was supplied by the owners with none of the field studies involve endangered or protected species. Ethics approval for the animal experiments was obtained from the National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR) Ethics Committee, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Sample collection

Two HPAI H5N1 virus strains, designated A/quail/Vietnam/CVVI-49/2010 (CVVI-49/2010) and A/quail/Vietnam/CVVI-50/2014 (CVVI-50/2014), were isolated from H5N1 outbreaks in quail in a passive surveillance program in Khanh Hoa province, a south-central region of Vietnam. These outbreaks occurred on quail farms in January 2010 and March 2014, and killed 476/2300 (20.7%) and 250/900 (27.8%) of the quail in each farm. The clinical signs in infected quail included depression, seizures, ataxia, neurological signs, and green, diarrheal feces. In most cases, two sick or dead quail from each farm were collected and transported to the Central Vietnam Veterinary Institute. Tissue samples from the brain, lung, spleen, bronchus, and intestine were collected and stored at −80°C for further examination. All handling tissue samples and viral cultures were carried in the Biosafety Level 3 laboratory.

Virus isolation in embryonated chicken eggs

The tissue samples were homogenized in phosphate buffer saline (PBS; pH 7.4) with antibiotics and clarified by centrifugation at 400 × g for 10 min. Supernatants were collected and filtered using a 0.45-μm sterile syringe filter (Corning Costar, Corning, NY, USA). Viruses were isolated using embryonated chicken eggs according to the World Health Organization (WHO) manual [31]. Briefly, 100 μl of each sample was inoculated into the amniotic cavity of three 10-day-old specific pathogen-free embryonated chicken eggs, and incubated at 37°C for 48 hrs. Virus was then harvested and stored at −80°C for further examinations.

RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR

The pooled tissue samples from each farm were homogenized in phosphate buffer saline (PBS; pH 7.4) and clarified by centrifugation at 400 × g for 10 min. Viral RNA was extracted using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted RNA was resuspended in RNase-free water and stored at −80°C until analysis. Real-time RT-PCR was performed according to the WHO manual [32]. Briefly, the QuantiTech Probe RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen) was used with 12.5 μl of Master Mix, 1.5 μl each of forward and reverse primers (10 μM), 0.5 μl of probe (5 μM), 0.25 μl of QuantiTect®RT Mix, 3.75 μl of RNAase free water, and 5.0 μl of RNA template in a 25-μl total volume. Using an ABI 7500 real-time thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), reverse transcription was carried out for 30 minutes at 50°C, followed by polymerase activation for 15 minutes at 95°C. Denaturation for 15 seconds at 94°C and annealing-extension for 1 minute at 56°C were performed for 45 cycles to obtain cycle threshold (Ct) values.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

The SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis Super Mix (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to prepare cDNA from the extracted RNA with Uni12 primer (5′-AGCRAAAGCAGG-3′). The reaction was carried out at 42°C for 60 min, followed by 72°C for 10 min. The full lengths of eight gene segments, HA, NA, PB2, PB1, PA, NP, M, and NS, were amplified as described previously [33,34] (S1 Table). Each PCR product was separated on a 1.2% SeaKem LE agarose gel (FMC, Rockland, ME, USA) and stained with ethidium bromide. The gels were viewed on a Gel Doc XR image analysis system (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Nucleotide sequencing and sequence analysis

The amplified PCR products were purified using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen). RT-PCR primers were used for direct sequencing of the HA, NA, PB2, PB1, PA, NP, M, and NS genes using a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit and an ABI 3730 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Walking sequencing primers were designed to obtain the sequences of the 5′ and 3′ ends of each gene (S1 Table). The resulting nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences were aligned using the Clustal_X 2.1 program [35] and Lasergene software (DNASTAR; Madison, WI, USA), with parameters set based on H5N1 viral sequences in the NCBI GenBank database. The nucleotide sequences obtained in this study were deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers KP872889–KP872904.

Phylogenetic analysis

The nucleotide sequences of the HA, NA, PB2, PB1, PA, NP, M, and NS genes obtained were compared against representative gene sequences from available HPAI H5N1 sequences in the GenBank database. The viral clades were defined follow the manual of the WHO⁄OIE⁄FAO H5N1 Evolution Working Group [7]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the neighbor-joining algorithm in the PHYLIP suite and the Kimura two-parameter model using MEGA 6.06 software [3638]. Evolutionary distances for the neighbor-joining analyses were based on the model described by Jukes and Cantor [39]. Tree topology was evaluated by a bootstrap re-sampling method, with 1000 replicates of the neighbor-joining dataset, using the SEQBOOT and CONSENSE programs in PHYLIP [38].

Results

Identification of HPAI H5N1 cases

The quail was dissected at CVVI to observe the clinical and pathological features of AIV infection. Quail with suspected AIV infections all displayed signs of acute phase disease. Internal organs, including the lung, liver, pancreas, and intestines, exhibited extreme swelling and hemorrhage. Viral RNA was extracted from pooled tissues. AIVs were identified by real-time RT-PCR of the M gene, showing Ct values between 17.6 and 22.6. The HA and NA genes of these two AIVs belonged to the H5 and N1 subtypes, respectively. The viruses were propagated in embryonated chicken eggs. The two H5N1 viruses that were isolated were given the strains designations of A/quail/Vietnam/CVVI-49/2010 (CVVI-49/2010) and A/quail/Vietnam/CVVI-50/2014 (CVVI-50/2014) (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Map of Vietnam showing the study areas.

The HPAI H5N1 outbreaks in quail were located in the highlighted provinces (red, green). Text on the right indicates specific HPAI H5N1 outbreaks and the HPAI H5N1 virus types circulating in northern, central, and southern regions of Vietnam between 2003 and 2014.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149608.g001

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic trees for all eights genes, including HA, NA, M, PB2, PB1, PA, NP, and NS, were constructed to examine genetic relatedness using sequences obtained in this study and available sequences in the GenBank database. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the HA genes of the CVVI-49/2010 and CVVI-50/2014 strains were clustered into clade 1.1.1 (A/chicken/Cambodia/TCL1/2009-like) and clade 2.3.2.1c (A/HongKong/6841/2010-like), respectively (Fig 2a). The CVVI-49/2010 strain was closely related to strains isolated in Cambodia and Vietnam between 2008 and 2012, with a nucleotide (nt) sequence identity to the A/chicken/Cambodia/TCL1/2009 strain of 99.2%. CVVI-50/2014 was closely related to strains isolated in mainland of China, Taiwan, Indonesia, and South Korea, with a nt sequence identity to the A/duck/Vietnam/QB1207/2012 strain of 99.2% (S2 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Phylogenetic trees from neighbor-joining analyses of the (a) HA genes, (b) NA genes, (c) PB1 genes, and (d) PB2 genes of the HPAI H5N1 study strains and reference strains available in the GenBank database.

The tree topology was constructed using the MEGA 6.06 program and bootstrap values were obtained from 1,000 resampled datasets. HPAI H5N1 virus clade names were determined based on specific criteria and reference strains, as described by the World Health Organization, World Organization for Animal Health, and Food and Agricultural Organization. The study strains are marked in bold and black squares.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149608.g002

Phylogenic analysis of the NA gene indicated that the CVVI-49/2010 and CVVI-50/2014 strains fall into two different genogroups, TCL1/2009-like (clade 1.1.1) and HK/1161-like (clade 2.3.2.1b), respectively (Fig 2b). This result may indicate that the NA gene of the CVVI-50/2014 (clade 2.3.2.1c) strain resulted from a reassortment event between clade 2.3.2.1c and 2.3.2.1b viruses (Fig 2a and 2b). Similar to the HA genes, the nt sequences of the NA genes of the CVVI-49/2010 and CVVI-50/2014 strains showed the highest identities to NA genes of the A/chicken/Cambodia/TCL1/2009 and A/duck/Vietnam/QB1207/2012 strains, sharing 99.0% and 99.7% of their nt sequences, respectively (S2 Table).

The internal genes of the CVVI-49/2010 strain were most closely related to the A/chicken/Cambodia/TLC1/2009 strain (clade 1.1.1), sharing nt sequence identities of 99.2%, 99.0%, 99.2%, 99.2%, 99.6%, and 98.9% for the PB1, PB2, PA, NP, M, and NS genes, respectively (Figs 2c, 2d and 3a–3d, S2 Table). Interestingly, for the CVVI-50/2014 strain (clade 2.3.2.1c), the majority of the internal genes (PB1, PB2, PA, NP, and M) were found to share a common ancestor with the A/Hubei/1/2010 prototype strain (clade 2.3.2.1a) (Figs 2c, 2d and 3a–3c), while the NS gene was found to share a common ancestor with the A/barn-swallow/Hong Kong/1161/2010 prototype strain (clade 2.3.2.1b) (Fig 3d). These results indicate that the CVVI-50/2014 strain may have resulted from multiple reassortment events between clade 2.3.2.1c, clade 2.3.2.1a, and clade 2.3.2.1b viruses.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Phylogenetic trees from neighbor-joining analyses of the (a) PA genes, (b) NP genes, (c) M genes, and (d) NS genes of the HPAI H5N1 study strains and reference strains available in the GenBank database.

The tree topology was constructed using the MEGA 6.06 program and bootstrap values were obtained from 1,000 resampled datasets. HPAI H5N1 virus clade names were determined based on specific criteria and reference strains, as described by the World Health Organization, World Organization for Animal Health, and Food and Agricultural Organization. The study strains are marked in bold and black squares.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149608.g003

Genetic analysis

Results obtained from molecular analysis of the HA genes are shown in Table 1. The HA cleavage site of the CVVI-49/2010 strain showed the REGRRKKR/G sequence, while the CVVI-50/2014 strain showed the RERRRKR/G sequence, indicating that an amino acid at position 329 was deleted. These results identified the CVVI-49/2010 and CVVI-50/2014 strains as H5N1 HPAI viruses. The receptor biding sites at positions 222 and 224 displayed a glutamine (Q) and glycine (G), respectively, suggesting that these viruses retain their affinities for avian cell surface receptors (SAα-2,3-linked receptor) [40]. Compared to the A/goose/Guangdong/1/1996 strain, the glycosylation sites in the CVVI-49/2010 and CVVI-50/2014 strains contain amino acid substitutions at positions 140R-K,N, 154N-D, 155S-N, and 156A-T (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Deduced amino acid sequences of the CVVI-49/2010 and CVVI-50/2014 strains relative to genetically related strains

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149608.t001

Mutations at amino acid positions 42P-S, 92D-E, and 149V-A of the NS1 protein have been reported to increase the virulence of the H5N1 viruses in different hosts [4144]. The CVVI-49/2010 and CVVI-50/2014 strains both displayed 42P-S and 149v-A mutations, and, additionally, the CVVI-50/2014 strain contained a 92D-E mutation (Table 1). In addition, five amino acid deletions at positions 80–84, an ESEV sequence at the NS1 C-terminal region, and a PDZ-domain motif were found that could indicate the study strains are highly virulent [44] (Table 1). No genetic marker associated with virulence in the PB2 protein (627E-K and 701D-N) in mammals was found in these two strains [45,46].

Compared to the A/goose/Guangdong/1/1996 reference strain, the NA sequences of CVVI-49/2010 and CVVI-50/2014 contain a 20-amino acid deletion at positions 49–68 in the NA stalk region (Table 2). These deletions have been related to AIV virulence and the ability of AIVs to be transmitted from water fowl to terrestrial poultry [47]. No amino acid substitutions were found in the NA region of the study strains. Interestingly, two amino acid mutations, 26L-I and 31S-N, were found in the M2 sequences that are known to be related to amantadine resistance [48] (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Antiviral resistance markers in the NA and M2 genes of the CVVI-49/2010 and CVVI-50/2014 strains relative to some genetically related strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149608.t002

Discussion

AIVs in land-based domestic poultry and mammalian species, including humans, can evolve rapidly [49]. The variety of viral reservoirs, especially aquatic birds and domestic poultry, may suggest why these viruses persist and are widespread in many countries. HPAI viruses, influenza virus subtypes H5 and H7, have caused high mortality in wild birds and domestic poultry around the world. In Vietnam, HPAI H5N1 viruses were first isolated in 2001; since then, these viruses have become endemic and caused devastating economic repercussions due to millions of poultry deaths, including those from culling [25,26]. The role of quail in the evolution of HPAI H5N1 viruses, and specifically, their ability to maintain and spread these viruses to difference species, was elucidated by several HPAI H5N1 surveillance studies, as well as in vivo and in vitro examinations [12,13,18,21,50]. Information on HPAI H5N1 outbreaks in quail in Vietnam is limited [30]. This study provides the first characterization of the viral genomes of two HPAI H5N1 viruses isolated from quail H5N1 outbreaks in 2010 and 2014 in Khanh Hoa province located in south-central Vietnam. The data reported here suggests a complex evolutionary picture of HPAI H5N1 viruses that have been circulating Vietnam in recent years, as well as indicate a likely role for quail in the evolution of HPAI viruses in the country.

Phylogenetic analysis of the HA genes indicated that the two study strains, CVVI-49/2010 and CVVI-50/2014, were separated into two different clades, clade 1.1.1 and clade 2.3.2.1c, respectively. Six HA clades have been circulating in Vietnam since 2007, including clades 1.1, 2.3.2.1, 2.3.4.1, 2.3.4.2, 2.3.4.3, and 7.1 [26]. Clade 1 viruses were detected in the northern and central regions of Vietnam between 2003 and 2007, and were subsequently replaced by clade 2.3.4 viruses after 2005 [25]. Clades 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 have emerged as a result of the evolution of clade 1, with clade 1.1.2 viruses persistently circulating in southern Vietnam [51,52]. In 2010, viruses from clade 2.3.2.1 that further evolved into subclades 2.3.2.1 (a,b,c), were identified in the north and have since rapidly spread to the entire country [53]. Detection of clades 1.1.1 and 2.3.2.1c in quail in Khanh Hoa province indicate that quail are susceptible hosts and that they may play important roles in maintaining and spreading HPAI H5N1 viruses among poultry and wild birds, with the potential for human infections [21].

Viral mutation and reassortment are the major evolutionary strategies of influenza viruses in response to immune and environmental pressures, resulting in genetic divergence, the potential for virulence enhancement, and new HPAI outbreaks [54]. Whole genome analyses of AIVs provide an excellent platform for determining the interspecies evolutionary relationships of these viruses [55]. Genetic analysis of HPAI H5N1 viruses circulating in Hong Kong in 1997 (A/Hong Kong/156/97) suggested that this virus strain probably originated from reassortment events between H9N2 (A/quail/HK/G1/97-like), H5N1 (A/goose/Guangdong/1/1996-like), and H6N1 (A/teal/HK/W312/97-like) viruses [56]. In this study, strain CVVI-50/2014 revealed evidence of intersubtype reassortment events between virus clades 2.3.2.1c, 2.3.2.1b, and 2.3.2.1a. The HA gene clustered with clade 2.3.2.1c (A/HongKong/6841/2010-like), while the NA and NS genes clustered with clade 2.3.2.1b (HK/1161-like), while the PB1, PB2, PA, NP, and M genes clustered with clade 2.3.2.1a (A/Hubei/1/2010). In contrast, the CVVI-49/2010 strain shared a common ancestor with the original clade 1.1.1 circulating in Cambodia and Vietnamese. Analysis of the amino acid (aa) sequence revealed that the two study strains shared high identity to the duck and chicken HPAI H5N1 viruses isolated in recently years, rather than with quail HPAI H5N1 viruses, suggesting that the study strains were spread from chickens or ducks to quail. These results support the idea that quail may play an important role in the evolution of HPAI H5N1 viruses in Vietnam [57, 58]. Further analyses will be needed to understand whether or not these strains can be transmitted to other adapted species.

Further analysis revealed that the quail were infected with HPAI H5N1 viruses with common motifs of multiple dibasic amino acids at cleavage sites that have been associated with high pathogenicity and that may be related to the high mortality rates seen at these farms. Quail are terrestrial poultry that should be considered potential intermediate hosts for influenza viruses because of their susceptibility to both mammalian and AIV subtypes [13]. Substitutions at aa positions 42A-S and 92D-E in the NS1 protein that are associated with increased virulence of AIVs in chickens and mice as well as inhibition of host immune responses were found in the study strains [42]. In addition, quails are usually raised in close contact with humans and their population is increasing in Vietnam, posing a concern for public health in areas where HPAI H5N1 viruses are circulating.

Humans infected by HPAI H5N1 viruses are of global public health concern. Worldwide, approximately 667 laboratory-confirmed human cases of H5N1 virus infections were reported during the 2003–2014 transmission season, resulting in 393 deaths [59]. Vietnam is among the countries with the highest rates of human H5N1 infections, with a reported 127 laboratory-confirmed human cases; of these cases, 62 were fatal [60]. Recent human HPAI pandemics have been associated with resistance to anti-influenza drugs, including adamantanes and neuraminidase inhibitors [61]. Resistance to adamantanes, including amantadine and rimantadine, are likely related to specific amino acid substitutions in the M2 protein at positions 26, 27, 30, 31, and 34, and resistance remains high among circulating influenza A viruses [62]. Four types of neuraminidase inhibitors have been developed, including oseltamivir (Tamiflu), zanamivir (Relenza), peramivir (Rapiacta), and laninamivir (Inavir) [63]. Resistance to neuraminidases are likely related to the amino acid substitutions at positions 275 (275H-Y) and 295 (295N-S) [63,64]. In strains from this study, no amino acid substitutions that are known to be related to oseltamivir resistance were found. However, the M2 gene of the CVVI-49/2010 strain contained amino acid substitutions at positions 26L-I and 31S-N, which may cause amantadine resistance [48]. To maintain treatment options, continued antiviral susceptibility monitoring in H5N1 viruses is needed [48].

In conclusion, this study provided the full genomic characterization of HPAI H5N1 subtype viruses in quail in Vietnam. The results indicate the possibility of multiple genetic reassortment events among HPAI H5N1 virus clades 2.3.2.1c, 2.3.2.1b, and 2.3.2.1a. In addition, markers of resistance to anti-influenza drugs, the adamantanes, were identified. These data provide support for the role of quail as an important intermediate host in AIV evolution. Therefore, additional surveillance is needed to monitor AIVs, serologically and virologically, in quail in Vietnam.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Primers used for amplifying and sequencing of the eight gene segments in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149608.s001

(DOC)

S2 Table. Nucleotide sequence identity of the eight gene segments of the CVVI-49/2010 and CVVI-50/2014 strains relative to some genetically related strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149608.s002

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (2013R1A1A2A10012148).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WK. Performed the experiments: THN. Analyzed the data: THN VTT HDT WK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: VKH, DTN, WK. Wrote the paper: THN VTT WK.

References

  1. 1. Sonnberg S, Webby RJ, Webster RG. Natural history of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1. Virus Res. 2013; 178: 63–77. pmid:23735535
  2. 2. de Jong MD, Hien TT. Avian influenza A (H5N1). J Clin Virol. 2006; 35: 2–13. pmid:16213784
  3. 3. Tong S, Zhu X, Li Y, Shi M, Zhang J, Bourgeois M, et al. New world bats harbor diverse influenza A viruses. PLoS Pathogens. 2013; 9: e1003657. pmid:24130481
  4. 4. Alexander DJ. A review of avian influenza in different bird species. Vet Microbiol. 2000; 74: 3–13. pmid:10799774
  5. 5. Xu X, Subbarao K, Cox NJ, Guo Y. Genetic characterization of the pathogenic influenza A/Goose/Guangdong/1/96 (H5N1) virus: similarity of its hemagglutinin gene to those of H5N1 viruses from the 1997 outbreaks in Hong Kong. Virology 1999; 261: 15–19. pmid:10484749
  6. 6. WHO. Avian influenza Fact sheet. Updated March 2014. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/avian_influenza/en/. Accessed 11 November 2014.
  7. 7. WHO/OIE/FAO. Continued evolution of highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1): updated nomenclature. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2012; 6: 1–5. pmid:22035148
  8. 8. WHO/OIE/FAO. Revised and updated nomenclature for highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2014; 8: 384–388. pmid:24483237
  9. 9. Webster RG, Sharp GB, Claas EC. Interspecies transmission of influenza viruses. Am J Resp Crit Care 1995; 152: S25.
  10. 10. Hulse-Post D, Sturm-Ramirez K, Humberd J, Seiler P, Govorkova E, Krauss S, et al. Role of domestic ducks in the propagation and biological evolution of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses in Asia. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 10682–10687.
  11. 11. Thontiravong A, Kitikoon P, Wannaratana S, Tantilertcharoen R, Tuanudom R, Pakpinyo S, et al. Quail as a potential mixing vessel for the generation of new reassortant influenza A viruses. Vet Microbiol. 2012; 160: 305–313. pmid:22763173
  12. 12. Wan H, Perez DR. Quail carry sialic acid receptors compatible with binding of avian and human influenza viruses. Virology 2006; 346: 278–286. pmid:16325879
  13. 13. Makarova NV, Ozaki H, Kida H, Webster RG, Perez DR. Replication and transmission of influenza viruses in Japanese quail. Virology 2003; 310: 8–15. pmid:12788625
  14. 14. Lee YJ, Choi YK, Kim YJ, Song MS, Jeong OM, Lee EK, et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) in domestic poultry and relationship with migratory birds, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008; 14: 487. pmid:18325269
  15. 15. Chen H, Smith G, Li K, Wang J, Fan X, Rayner JM, et al. Establishment of multiple sublineages of H5N1 influenza virus in Asia: implications for pandemic control. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 2845–2850.
  16. 16. Wang J, Vijaykrishna D, Duan L, Bahl J, Zhang JX, Webster RG, et al. Identification of the progenitors of Indonesian and Vietnamese avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses from southern China. J Virol. 2008; 82: 3405–3414. pmid:18216109
  17. 17. Uchida Y, Chaichoune K, Wiriyarat W, Watanabe C, Hayashi T, Patchimasiri T, et al. Molecular epidemiological analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 subtype isolated from poultry and wild bird in Thailand. Virus Res. 2008; 138: 70–80. pmid:18801394
  18. 18. Saito T, Watanabe C, Takemae N, Chaisingh A, Uchida Y, Buranathai C, et al. Pathogenicity of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses of H5N1 subtype isolated in Thailand for different poultry species. Vet Microbiol. 2009; 133: 65–74. pmid:18675524
  19. 19. Kim HR, Lee YJ, Park CK, Oem JK, Lee OS, Kang HM, et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1) outbreaks in wild birds and poultry, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012; 18: 480–483. pmid:22377052
  20. 20. Lee EK, Kang HM, Kim KI, Choi JG, To TL, Nguyen TD, et al. Genetic evolution of H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in domestic poultry in Vietnam between 2011 and 2013. Poult Sci. 2015; 94: 650–661. pmid:25743422
  21. 21. Dong G, Luo J, Zhou K, Wu B, Peng C, Ji G, et al. Characterization of the amantadine-resistant H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza variants isolated from quails in Southern China. Virus Genes 2014; 49: 223–232. pmid:24993865
  22. 22. Nguyen DC, Uyeki TM, Jadhao S, Maines T, Shaw M, Matsuoka Y, et al. Isolation and characterization of avian influenza viruses, including highly pathogenic H5N1, from poultry in live bird markets in Hanoi, Vietnam, in 2001. J Virol. 2005; 79: 4201–4212. pmid:15767421
  23. 23. WHO. H5N1 avian influenza: Timeline of major events. Available: http://www.who.int/influenza/human_animal_interface/H5N1_avian_influenza_update200412.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2014.
  24. 24. Dung Nguyen T, Vinh Nguyen T, Vijaykrishna D, Webster RG, Guan Y, Malik Peiris JS, et al. Multiple sublineages of influenza A virus (H5N1), Vietnam, 2005–2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008; 14: 632–636. pmid:18394281
  25. 25. Wan XF, Nguyen T, Davis CT, Smith CB, Zhao ZM, Carrel M, et al. Evolution of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses in Vietnam between 2001 and 2007. PLoS One 2008; 3: e3462. pmid:18941631
  26. 26. Nguyen T, Rivailler P, Davis CT, Hoa do T, Balish A, Dang NH, et al. Evolution of highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1) virus populations in Vietnam between 2007 and 2010. Virology 2012; 432: 405–416. pmid:22818871
  27. 27. Muramoto Y, Le TQ, Phuong LS, Nguyen T, Nguyen TH, Sakai-Tagawa Y, et al. Molecular characterization of the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase genes of H5N1 influenza A viruses isolated from poultry in Vietnam from 2004 to 2005. J Vet Med Sci. 2006; 68: 527–531. pmid:16757902
  28. 28. Okamatsu M, Nishi T, Nomura N, Yamamoto N, Sakoda Y, Sakurai K, et al. The genetic and antigenic diversity of avian influenza viruses isolated from domestic ducks, muscovy ducks, and chickens in northern and southern Vietnam, 2010–2012. Virus Genes 2013; 47: 317–329. pmid:23861018
  29. 29. Creanga A, Thi Nguyen D, Gerloff N, Thi Do H, Balish A, Dang Nguyen H et al. Emergence of multiple clade 2.3. 2.1 influenza A (H5N1) virus subgroups in Vietnam and detection of novel reassortants. Virology 2013; 444: 12–20. pmid:23849789
  30. 30. Smith G, Naipospos T, Nguyen T, De Jong M, Vijaykrishna D, Usman TB, et al. Evolution and adaptation of H5N1 influenza virus in avian and human hosts in Indonesia and Vietnam. Virology 2006; 350: 258–268. pmid:16713612
  31. 31. WHO. WHO manual on animal influenza diagnosis and surveillance. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.
  32. 32. WHO. Recommendations and laboratory procedures for detection of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus in specimens from suspected human cases. Available: http://www.who.int/influenza/resources/documents/RecAIlabtestsAug07.pdf. Revised August 2007.
  33. 33. Hoffmann E, Stech J, Guan Y, Webster RG, Perez DR. Universal primer set for the full-length amplification of all influenza A viruses. Arch Virol. 2001; 146: 2275–2289. pmid:11811679
  34. 34. Li OT, Barr I, Leung CY, Chen H, Guan Y, Peiris JS, et al. Reliable universal RT-PCR assays for studying influenza polymerase subunit gene sequences from all 16 haemagglutinin subtypes. J Virol Methods 2007; 142: 218–222. pmid:17324474
  35. 35. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown N, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 2947–2948. pmid:17846036
  36. 36. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4: 406–425. pmid:3447015
  37. 37. Gascuel O, Steel M. Neighbor-joining revealed. Mol Biol Evol. 2006; 23: 1997–2000. pmid:16877499
  38. 38. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP: phylogenetic inference package, version 3.5c, 1993.
  39. 39. Jukes TH, Canter CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro HN, editor, Mammalian Protein Metabolism, pp. 21–132, Academic Press, New York, 1969.
  40. 40. Ha Y, Stevens DJ, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. X-ray structures of H5 avian and H9 swine influenza virus hemagglutinins bound to avian and human receptor analogs. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 11181–11186.
  41. 41. Jiao P, Tian G, Li Y, Deng G, Jiang Y, Liu C, et al. A single-amino-acid substitution in the NS1 protein changes the pathogenicity of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in mice. J Virol. 2008; 82: 1146–1154. pmid:18032512
  42. 42. Long J-X, Peng D-X, Liu Y-L, Wu Y-T, Liu X-F. Virulence of H5N1 avian influenza virus enhanced by a 15-nucleotide deletion in the viral nonstructural gene. Virus Genes 2008; 36: 471–478. pmid:18317917
  43. 43. Li Z, Jiang Y, Jiao P, Wang A, Zhao F, Tian G, et al. The NS1 gene contributes to the virulence of H5N1 avian influenza viruses. J Virol. 2006; 80: 11115–11123. pmid:16971424
  44. 44. Obenauer JC, Denson J, Mehta PK, Su X, Mukatira S, Finkelstein DB et al. Large-scale sequence analysis of avian influenza isolates. Science 2006; 311: 1576–1580. pmid:16439620
  45. 45. Hatta M, Gao P, Halfmann P, Kawaoka Y. Molecular basis for high virulence of Hong Kong H5N1 influenza A viruses. Science 2001; 293: 1840–1842. pmid:11546875
  46. 46. Li Z, Chen H, Jiao P, Deng G, Tian G, Li Y, et al. Molecular basis of replication of duck H5N1 influenza viruses in a mammalian mouse model. J Virol. 2005; 79: 12058–12064. pmid:16140781
  47. 47. Zhou H, Yu Z, Hu Y, Tu J, Zou W, Peng Y, et al. The special neuraminidase stalk-motif responsible for increased virulence and pathogenesis of H5N1 influenza A virus. PloS One 2009; 4: e6277. pmid:19609439
  48. 48. Govorkova EA, Baranovich T, Seiler P, Armstrong J, Burnham A, Guan Y et al. Antiviral resistance among highly pathogenic influenza A (H5N1) viruses isolated worldwide in 2002–2012 shows need for continued monitoring. Antivir Res. 2013; 98: 297–304. pmid:23458714
  49. 49. Zhou NN, Shortridge KF, Claas EC, Krauss SL, Webster RG. Rapid evolution of H5N1 influenza viruses in chickens in Hong Kong. J Virol. 1999; 73: 3366–3374. pmid:10074191
  50. 50. Uno Y, Usui T, Soda K, Fujimoto Y, Takeuchi T, Ito H et al. The pathogenicity and host immune response associated with H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in quail. J Vet Med Sci. 2013; 75: 451–457. pmid:23182866
  51. 51. Long NT, Thanh TT, van Doorn HR, Vu PP, Dung PT, Dung TT et al. Recent avian influenza virus A/H5N1 evolution in vaccinated and unvaccinated poultry from farms in Southern Vietnam, January-March 2010. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2011; 58: 537–543. pmid:21586098
  52. 52. WHO (2014) Candidate vaccine viruses and potency testing reagents for influenza A (H5N1). Available: http://www.who.int/influenza/vaccines/virus/201402_h5h7h9h10_vaccinevirusupdate.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 12 July 2014.
  53. 53. Le TH, Nguyen NT. Evolutionary dynamics of highly pathogenic avian influenza A/H5N1 HA clades and vaccine implementation in Vietnam. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2014; 3: 117–127. pmid:25003084
  54. 54. Wei K, Chen Y, Xie D. Genome-scale evolution and phylodynamics of H5N1 influenza virus in China during 1996–2012. Vet Microbiol. 2013; 167: 383–393. pmid:24161594
  55. 55. Bao Y, Bolotov P, Dernovoy D, Kiryutin B, Zaslavsky L, Tatusova T, et al. The influenza virus resource at the National Center for Biotechnology Information. J Virol. 2008; 82: 596–601. pmid:17942553
  56. 56. Guan Y, Shortridge KF, Krauss S, Webster RG. Molecular characterization of H9N2 influenza viruses: were they the donors of the “internal” genes of H5N1 viruses in Hong Kong? P Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 9363–9367.
  57. 57. Perez DR, Lim W, Seiler JP, Yi G, Peiris M, Shortridge KF et al. Role of quail in the interspecies transmission of H9 influenza A viruses: molecular changes on HA that correspond to adaptation from ducks to chickens. J Virol. 2003; 77: 3148–3156. pmid:12584339
  58. 58. Thontiravong A, Wannaratana S, Tantilertcharoen R, Prakairungnamthip D, Tuanudom R, Sasipreeyajan J, et al. Comparative study of pandemic (H1N1) 2009, swine H1N1, and avian H3N2 influenza viral infections in quails. J Vet Sci. 2012; 13: 395–403. pmid:23271181
  59. 59. WHO. Influenza at the human-animal interface. Available: http://www.who.int/influenza/human_animal_interface/Influenza_Summary_IRA_HA_interface_27June14.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2014.
  60. 60. WHO. Cumulative number of confirmed human cases for avian influenza A (H5N1) reported to WHO, 2003–2014. Available: http://www.who.int/influenza/human_animal_interface/EN_GIP_20140124CumulativeNumberH5N1cases.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2014.
  61. 61. Hurt AC, Ho HT, Barr I. Resistance to anti-influenza drugs: adamantanes and neuraminidase inhibitors. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2006; 4: 795–805. pmid:17140356
  62. 62. Fiore AE, Fry A, Shay D, Gubareva L, Bresee JS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Antiviral agents for the treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza–recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2011; 60: 1–24.
  63. 63. Leang SK, Kwok S, Sullivan SG, Maurer-Stroh S, Kelso A, Barr IG, et al. Peramivir and laninamivir susceptibility of circulating influenza A and B viruses. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2014; 8: 135–139. pmid:24734292
  64. 64. Le QM, Kiso M, Someya K, Sakai YT, Nguyen TH, Nguyen KH, et al. Avian flu: isolation of drug-resistant H5N1 virus. Nature 2005; 437: 1108–1108. pmid:16228009