http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7258-5090
Figures
Abstract
Porous starch granules (PSGs) with various pores and cavity sizes were prepared by amylolysis enzymes. The greatest hydrolysis rate on corn starch granule was observed with α-amylase, followed by gluco- and β-amylases. Temperature increase enhanced glucoamylase reaction rate more drastically than other enzyme treatments. Final hydrolysis level with glucoamylase reached to 66.9%, close to 67.5% of α-amylolysis. The α-amylase-treated PSGs displayed the greatest pore size and ratio of cavity-to-granule diameters. Gelatinization onset temperatures of PSGs increased to 72.1 (α-), 68.7 (β-), and 68.1°C (gluco-amylolysis) after 8 h; enthalpy changes of β- and gluco-amylase-treated PSGs increased to 13.4, and 13.1 J/g but α-amylase-treated one showed slightly reduced value of 8.5 J/g. Water holding capacities of PSGs were 209.7 (α-), 94.6 (β-), and 133.8% (gluco-amylolysis), and the untreated control had 89.1%; oil holding capacities of them showed 304.5, 182.7, and 211.5%, respectively, while the untreated control had 161.8%. Thus, enzyme types and their reaction conditions can be applied to generate desirable cavity and pore sizes in starch granules. This biocatalytic approach could contribute to develop tailor-made PSGs with distinct internal structure for specific uses in wide range of food, pharmaceutical and other industrial applications.
Citation: Jung Y-s, Lee B-H, Yoo S-H (2017) Physical structure and absorption properties of tailor-made porous starch granules produced by selected amylolytic enzymes. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0181372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181372
Editor: Diego F. Gomez-Casati, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, ARGENTINA
Received: March 26, 2017; Accepted: June 29, 2017; Published: July 20, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Jung et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (No. 2014M3A7B4051898). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Biopolymers are widely used as encapsulated agents and loading-carrier materials in food, agricultural, and pharmaceutical area. Among all natural available biopolymers, starch is the most commonly applied in the biomaterial fields due to its beneficial advantages such as low-cost, low-toxicity, biodegradability, and renewability [1]. Despite these properties of starch materials, the industrial applications of starch are often limited because of its poor rheological properties and limited surface areas [2, 3]. Therefore, many studies have been undertaken to extend the starch application by using physical, chemical, and enzymatic methods to obtain desired specific properties and larger surface areas [4–6].
Porous starch has been interested because it has high surface area and accessible inner empty space. These properties can be applied in food, cosmetics, and other related industries as absorbents as well controlled delivery materials [7]. Porous structure of native and partially-gelatinized starch materials has been conventionally produced by physical and chemical modifications through extrusion, jet cooking, solvent exchanging, and sonication treatment [8–12]. Furthermore, porous starch granules (PSGs) can be produced by amylolytic enzymes without disintegration of granular integrity. When native starch granules are treated with amylolytic enzymes, semi-crystalline granular structure is degraded, leaving behind porous or broken starch granule structure [13].
For the enzymatic production of porous starch granule, α-, β-, and gluco-amylases, are the most common enzymes for structural modification of starch granule. α-Amylase can hydrolyze the internal α-1,4-glucosidic bonds of starch molecules with endo-hydrolytic activities except for those near the α-1,6 branching points. Basically, α-amylolysis occurs at any α-1,4-linkages in a random manner, resulting in wide pores on starch granules. β-Amylase is an exo-type enzyme that removes maltose units sequentially from non-reducing ends and stop the reaction near the α-1,6 branching points [14, 15]. Glucoamylase is another exo-acting enzyme that catalyzes the both α-1,4-and α-1,6-linkage hydrolyses starting from the non-reducing ends of the starch molecule chains and is able to drill sharp and deep channels on starch granules [16, 17]. Structures of the PSGs may allow certain chemicals to enter the central cavity of granules through the pores generated enzymatically. PSGs have protecting capability of labile compounds against light or oxygen exposure [3, 18]. Also, it was reported that PSGs prepared by the combined treatments of gluco- and α-amylases retained more coffee flavor compared to native starch [19].
Many researchers studied the formation of pores on starch granules by amylolytic enzymes and investigated application of PSGs products as encapsulation or carrier agent [3, 13, 20]. However, few attempts have been made regarding the preparation of granular starch with tailor-made pore size and its characteristics, especially of loading-carrier capacity of bioactive components. The optimal pore and cavity sizes of PSG may be different depending on the type and amount of targeted loading core materials. Also, the holding capacity in PSGs of loaded materials is another important parameter as an encapsulated or carrier agent. Thus, PSGs with tailor-made size of the pores and cavities by applying starch-active biocatalysts were prepared and their physicochemical properties and potentials as matrices for carrying lipophilic or hydrophilic bioactive chemicals were examined in this research.
Materials and methods
Materials and chemicals
Normal corn starch (NCS) was provided from Ingredion Inc. (Westchester, IL), and it was used as a granule starch to prepare PSGs. Three different types of starch hydrolyzing enzymes, glucoamylase from Aspergillus niger (Optidex L-400), β-amylase from barley (Optimalt® BBA), and α-amylase from Bacillus lichemiformis (Spezyme Xtra), were obtained from the Dupont™ Genencor® Science (Rochester, NY). Soybean oil was purchased from commercial products in a local market. Other reagent-grade chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Enzyme assay
One unit of hydrolyzing enzymes was determined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the production of 1 μmol of reducing sugars per minute. Individual enzyme assays were carried out in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (optimal pH of each enzymes; glucoamylase: pH 4.5, α-amylase: pH 5.8, and β-amylase: pH 5.2) containing 1 mg/mL of soluble starch (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) at 40°C for 10 min. After the reaction, the amount of released reducing sugar was measured by the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method, using glucose for glucoamylase activity or maltose as a standard for α- and β-amylases [21, 22].
Preparation of PSGs by enzymatic treatment
Enzymatic reaction for producing the PSGs was carried out in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (at optimal pHs of each enzyme) with 5% (w/v) of NCS. The individual hydrolyzing enzyme (800 U/g of starch) was added to the substrate mixture, and then the reaction was carried out at 30 or 40°C up to 8 h. After the reaction, 0.1 M NaOH was added to stop the enzyme activity. The dispersion was centrifuged (3,000 × g) at 4°C for 20 min, and the precipitated- modified starch pallet was washed twice with deionized water. The slurry was freeze-dried, and then the dried-sample was passed through a 100-mesh sieve. The sieved-product was stored in a desiccator at room temperature [18].
To determine the hydrolysis degree of PSGs, the diluted supernatant and DNS solution were mixed to ratio of 1:1. The mixture was kept in a boiling water bath for 5 min and was cooled in ice bath. The absorbance was measured at 575 nm using a UV/vis spectrophotometer (DU730, Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA). The degree of hydrolysis was determined using the following equation:
where V0 is the weight of raw starch sample; V1 is the weight of total released reducing ends equivalent to glucose; M is the molar mass of glucose in starch (anhydroglucose unit, 162 g/mol); and m is the molar mass of d-glucose in supernatant after hydrolysis reaction (180 g/mol), respectively
Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM)
The morphological properties of native corn starch and PSGs were observed by a field-emission scanning electron microscope (Supra 55 VP, Carl-Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The samples were coated with platinum by a sputter coater (SCD 005, BAL-TEC, Walluf, Germany) and were observed at 15,000× magnification under an accelerating voltage of 3 kV. Surface pore diameters of starch granule were measured, and the diameters of the longest axes in each of 5 pores within an image for a total of 5 images per sample were quantified by using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)
Merbromin-treated starch granules [23] were placed in immersion oil on a glass slide, overlaid with a glass cover slip, and observed with a TCS SP5 Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM, Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany) equipped with an argon laser. The excitation wavelength was 488 nm with 20% capacity and the light detected at the interval from 505 to 580 nm. During image acquisition, each line was scanned six times and averaged to reduce noise [24].
Thermal properties of PSGs by differential scanning calorimeter
Thermal properties of PSGs were analyzed by using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC-200, Netzsch, Selb, Germany). The starch sample (5 mg) was exactly weighed in an aluminum pan, and deionized water (15 mg) was added. This starch dispersion was equilibrated at ambient temperature for 24 h. The sealed sample was scanned from 20 to 120°C at a heating rate of 5°C/min, using an empty pan as a reference [25].
Water holding capacity of PSGs
To measure the water holding capacity, starch (0.2 g, dry basis) was suspended in distilled water (4 mL) and shaken vigorously to fully disperse the starch. The suspended starch solution was allowed to stand for 10 min at ambient temperature. After the 10-min suspending period, the dispersion was centrifuged (1000 × g, 15 min), and the sediment was weighed. Water holding capacity of PSGs was calculated according to the following equation:
where W0 is the initial weight (g) of starch sample before treatment; W1 is the final weight (g) of starch sample after treatment. The analysis result was presented as the mean value of three replications [12].
Oil holding capacity of PSGs
To measure the oil holding capacity, soybean oil (6 mL) was added to sample (0.5 g) in a graduated 50 mL centrifuge tube. The tube was vortexed for 1 min, left for 30 min and centrifuged for 25 min at 3000 × g. After 25 min the supernatant was removed, and the sediment was weighed. Oil holding capacity was calculated as:
where W0 is the initial weight (g) of starch sample before treatment, and W1 is the is the final weight (g) of starch sample after treatment. The results presented are the mean values of three replications [26].
Results and discussion
Effects of selected amylolytic enzymes on the hydrolysis pattern of native starch granule
The hydrolysis rates of NCS granules by the amylolytic enzymes were analyzed at two different temperatures, 30 and 40°C. The greatest hydrolysis rate of starch granule was observed when the NCS was hydrolyzed by α-amylase, and followed by glucoamylase and β-amylase, respectively (Table 1). Among three different amylases, the initial hydrolysis rates (v0) of α-amylase (5.8×10−3 s-1) on native starch granule was faster than glucoamylase (1.1×10−3 s-1) and β-amylase (7.8×10−5 s-1) at 40°C (Fig 1).
Solid line, α-amylase; short-dashed line, β-amylase; long-dashed line, glucoamylase.
Thus, it was clearly observed that endo-activity of α-amylase can hydrolyze the starch granules more effectively than exo-types of glucoamylase and β-amylase. The total amount of released reducing sugars by α-amylase reaction increased as much as twice throughout whole reaction time period up to 12 h by increasing reaction temperature from 30 to 40°C. The degree of hydrolysis at 30°C for 12 h (33.8%) was similar to the resulted at 40°C within 2 h (33.0%) by α-amylase treatment.
The temperature effect on the hydrolysis level of glucoamylase was even greater, thus it produced more than three times larger amount of reducing sugars at 8 h and thereafter. As a result, the increase of the reaction temperature by 10°C enhanced the v0 of glucoamylase more drastically than other two enzymes, and eventually the degree of hydrolysis by glucoamylase reached the plateau (66.88%) of which the level was very close to that of α-amylase (67.46%) after 12 h. The amount of released glucose after 4-h α-amylase treatment was similar to that of 8-h glucoamylase treatment at 40°C. It was caused by the difference in reaction pattern between α-amylase and glucoamylase. α-Amylase is an endo-type enzyme that can randomly hydrolyzed α-1,4 glycosidic bonds of starch, and glucoamylase is an exo-type enzyme that can not only hydrolyze α-1,4 glycosidic bonds but also α-1,6 glycosidic bonds [27]. Thus, glucoamylase and α-amylase reached the same degree of hydrolysis under the extended reaction time period, even though the v0 of α-amylase was faster.
β-Amylolysis for 12 h showed that the starch granules were hydrolyzed in 1.7 and 2.8% of degrees at 30 and 40°C, respectively. Compared to these α-amylase and glucoamylase enzymes, β-amylase hydrolyzed the starch granules very slowly, and it was unable to destruct native starch granule effectively. Also, it was well reported that β-amylase hydrolyzed very slowly on all the starches over α-amylase [28]. Although both glucoamylase and β-amylase are exo-hydrolytic enzymes, glucoamylase can uniquely hydrolyze α-1,6 branched points and the action of this enzyme resulted in incomparably higher degree of hydrolysis than β-amylase reaction.
Morphological properties of amylase-treated starch granules
In the FE-SEM analysis, α-amylase-treated starch granules showed relatively fewer number of large pores with many cracks whereas glucoamylase-treated ones had lots of small pores under the same conditions (Fig 2). The size and number of surface pores on starch granules produced by starch hydrolyzing enzymes were presented at different reaction time and temperature in Tables 2 and 3. The range of pore diameters generated by α-amylase was more diverse and wider (600–1,200 nm) compared to that of glucoamylase (500–600 nm). The β-amylase-treated granules at 40°C had the large number of nano-size pores, of which diameters were less than 100 nm on the surface. The number of pores on the surface of α-amylase-treated granules decreased along with the hydrolysis time, because small pores produced initially became larger and then merged into bigger size of pores. As the reaction time and temperature increased, the average size of pores became larger by α-amylolysis and the number of broken PSGs with the pore diameter of over 1 μm were increased. Between two exo-type enzymes, only glucoamylase hydrolyzes 1,6-linkage, which can facilitate to enhance amylolytic capability toward raw starch granule. The other exo-type β-amylase consistently showed low hydrolytic efficiency on the starch granule, thus this enzymatic reaction never reached to the hydrolysis level of other two enzymes. Thus, the discrepancy in the reaction patterns on starch granule among these amylolytic enzymes were considered as the crucial reason to produce different patterns of surface pores.
C, control (NCS); A, α-amylase; B, β-amylase; G, glucoamylase. The numbers in the image panels mean the reaction time in hour scale. For example, A2 means that native starch granule was treated with α-amylase for 2 h. The magnification is 6,500 ×.
When the same degrees of starch hydrolysis were obtained from an enzyme treatment with different reaction temperatures and times, it was noticed that the size and morphology of pores on surface of starch granules were almost identical. Thus, amylolysis at 40°C for 2–4 h would be better applicable than the treatment at 30°C for 8 h. In this observation, it was affirmatively supported by the previous research [29] that the size of pores on starch granule could be manipulated by selecting proper type of amylase and by controlling its reaction condition
Internal structures of PSGs analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscope
The internal structure of enzyme-treated starch granules at 40°C during different reaction time internals was visualized by means of the confocal microscopic method (Fig 3). When starch granules were treated with α-amylase, internal cavity in the hilum and surface pore were enlarged simultaneously. After 8-h reaction of α-amylase at 40°C, the large proportion of PSGs were broken apart by excessive hydrolysis. It can be reasonably speculated that the endo-active α-amylase accessed to the internal structure of PSGs and then rather freely hydrolyzed amorphous and imperfect crystalline regions inside. Thus the enlarging rate of internal cavity and surface pores was relatively fast, and the broken particles were easily observed due to excessively expanded cavity and pores. Shrestha, Blazek [30] reported that by ‘inside out’ digestion, the surface pores merged together forming larger channels and resulting in hollow interiors. The β-amylase-treated PSGs showed unchanged size of central cavity inside compared to untreated corn starch granule and formed only deep and narrow pores, while the channel from surface to internal cavity became expand through continuous enzyme reaction. When glucoamylase was treated on starch granules, the cavity and pores became wider and pores were being connected to cavity along with reaction time. However, the enlarging rate of cavity and pore sizes never reached to the degrees obtained with α-amylase. As mentioned earlier, glucoamylase displayed lower hydrolysis rate than α-amylase, but made wide cavity, unlike β-amylase, resulting from the action of glucoamylase which can not only hydrolyze α-1,4 glycosidic bonds, but also α-1,6 glycosidic bonds.
C, control (NCS); A, α-amylase; B, β-amylase; and G, glucoamylase. The number means the reaction time. For example, A2 means that α-amylase was treated on starch granule for 2 h.
The ratio of internal cavity diameter (Dc) over granule diameter (Dg) of PSGs produced by amylolytic enzymes at 40°C was determined from different reaction time points (Table 4). After 2 h of α-amylase treatment, this Dc/Dg ratio increased to 0.54, which was 57% greater than 0.31 of untreated NCS. Meanwhile, the Dc/Dg ratio after β-amylase treatment kept constant to 0.37, which was very similar with that of NCS. Because β-amylase had very low hydrolysis efficiency on raw starch granules, it was expected that internal cavity may not be significantly enlarged. In case of another exo-type glucoamylase that harbors α-1,6 linkage hydrolytic activity, the ratio of Dc/Dg was 0.52 after 8-h incubation at 40°C, which was equivalent to the value of the PSGs treated with α-amylase for 2 h implying more efficient hydrolysis of starch granule than did β-amylase.
Thermal transition properties of PSGs
Gelatinization temperature (Tgel) of starch granule in the presence of water has been known to be affected by the structure of crystalline region, which corresponds to the external chain of amylopectin molecules formed with the double helical structure [31, 32]. Compared to the gelatinization onset temperature (To = 66.7°C) and enthalpy change (ΔHgel = 10.6 J/g) of NCS, enzymatic digestion of native starch granule caused to increase To by at least 0.7°C from 2-h gluco-amylolysis and up to 5.3°C from 8-h α-amylolysis (Table 5). Previous research showed that corn starch granules treated with amylolytic enzymes displayed higher gelatinization temperature [3]. By α-amylase hydrolysis, it was also reported that the significant increases in To and Tp were observed from waxy rice and barley starch, respectively [33, 34].
From our enzymatic hydrolysis study, it was shown that endo-type α-amylase increased the To of starch granule gelatinization much greater, then followed by the other two exo-type β-amylase and glucoamylase, respectively. Slight increase in the Tgel range (ΔT; Tc-To) of starch granules was also observed by all the enzyme treatments in this melting phenomenon but there was no significant difference among the enzyme-treated samples. The endo-type enzyme might be much easier to access and hydrolyze both amorphous and imperfect crystalline regions inside starch granule in the diffusive mode, once the enzyme made complete holes in the centripetal mode [35]. As a result, this endo-amylolysis led to slow but steady decrease in ΔHgel over the reaction time [33]. Because exo-type amylolytic enzymes preferentially degraded the amorphous regions mostly from outer layers of starch granule without attacking weak crystalline region, the increase in proportion of crystalline region was expected from the PSGs produced exo-catalytically [36], and thus resulted in significant increases in ΔHgel within initial 2 h of exo-amylolysis.
Water and oil holding capacity of PSGs
In an effort to utilize the porous structure of starch granule as a delivery system of nutrients or drugs, its loading capacity was evaluated by applying two different liquids, water and oil. When enzymatic hydrolysis was pursued at 40°C, the reaction time influenced on water holding capacity (WHC) of starch granules (Table 6). As the enzymatic reaction time increased, the WHC of α-amylase-treated PSGs increased from 148.9 to 225.6% at 4 h, then decreased to 209.7% after 8 h. As a control, the enzyme-untreated NCS granule displayed 89.0% of WHC. This value of glucoamylase-treated PSGs increased steadily to 133.8% after 8 h while β-amylase treatment on starch granule did not change it significantly up to 8-h reaction. It was previously shown that the starch granules structure was disintegrated and led to decrease in the holding capacity of water by excess treatment of enzymes [3], which was in good agreement with our result that the WHC decreased in 8-h α-amylase-treated PSGs.
Oil holding capacity (OHC) of starch granules was also affected by enzymatic hydrolysis at 40°C (Table 6). As a control, the OHC of NCS was determined to be 161.8%. As the reaction time increased, the OHC of α-amylase- and glucoamylase-treated PSGs increased from 233.1 and 185.5% to 304.5 and 211.5%, respectively, whereas the OHC of β-amylase-treated PSGs increased slightly at 2 h but did not show any significant change thereafter. Previous study showed that that the maximum holding capacity of PSGs did not appear at the maximum hydrolysis due to the decrease in surface area resulting from an increase in pore size [37]. Furthermore, they also reported that water and oil holding capacity decreased as the pore size was over-enlarged.
Conclusion
In this study, different types of PSGs were prepared by amylolytic enzymes such as α-amylase, β-amylase and glucoamylase which were able to generate various pores and cavity sizes on the surface. Unique structural and biochemical properties of PSGs can be designed and produced by different amylolytic enzyme treatments. When we utilized the internal cavity and expended surface area of PSGs, generated by these enzyme treatments, the holding capacity of water and oil was significantly increased with optimal porous structure production. Thus, different types of α-amylolytic enzymes and their various reaction conditions can be applied to produce desirable cavity and pore sizes in raw starch granules. This biocatalytic approach could apply to design tailor-made PSGs with distinct internal structure for specific uses as a novel carbohydrate-based delivery system or encapsulant in wide range of food, pharmaceutical and other industrial applications.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (No. 2014M3A7B4051898).
References
- 1. Qian J, Chen X, Ying X, Lv B. Optimisation of porous starch preparation by ultrasonic pretreatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2011;46(1):179–85.
- 2. Dura A, Błaszczak W, Rosell CM. Functionality of porous starch obtained by amylase or amyloglucosidase treatments. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;101:837–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.013. pmid:24299846
- 3. Zhang B, Cui D, Liu M, Gong H, Huang Y, Han F. Corn porous starch: Preparation, characterization and adsorption property. Int J Biol Macromol. 2012;50(1):250–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.11.002. pmid:22100869
- 4.
Donald AM. Understanding starch structure and functionality. In: Eliasson A-C, editor. Starch in Food: Structure, Function and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2004. p. 156–84.
- 5. Te Wierik GHP, Bergsma J, Arends-Scholte AW, Boersma T, Eissens AC, Lerk CF. A new generation of starch products as excipient in pharmaceutical tablets. I. Preparation and binding properties of high surface area potato starch products. Int J Pharm. 1996;134(1):27–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(95)04383-7.
- 6.
Yuryev V, Tomasik P, Bertoft E. Starch: Achievements in Understanding of Structure and Functionality. Huntington, NY: Nova Publishers; 2006.
- 7. Li H, Jiao A, Wei B, Wang Y, Wu C, Jin Z, et al. Porous starch extracted from Chinese rice wine vinasse: Characterization and adsorption properties. Int J Biol Macromolec. 2013;61:156–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.07.004.
- 8. Chang PR, Yu J, Ma X. Preparation of porous starch and its use as a structure-directing agent for production of porous zinc oxide. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83(2):1016–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.076.
- 9. Glenn GM, Klamczynski AP, Woods DF, Chiou B, Orts WJ, Imam SH. Encapsulation of plant oils in porous starch microspheres. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(7):4180–4. pmid:20196603
- 10. Luo Z, Fu X, He X, Luo F, Gao Q, Yu S. Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the physicochemical properties of maize starches differing in amylose content. Starch-Starke. 2008;60(11):646–53.
- 11. Yan H, Zhengbiao GU. Morphology of modified starches prepared by different methods. Food Res Int. 2010;43(3):767–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.11.013.
- 12. Kim J-Y, Huber KC. Corn starch granules with enhanced load-carrying capacity via citric acid treatment. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;91(1):39–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.049. pmid:23044103
- 13. Chen G, Zhang B. Hydrolysis of granular corn starch with controlled pore size. J Cereal Sci 2012;56(2):316–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2012.01.011.
- 14. Miao M, Li R, Huang C, Jiang B, Zhang T. Impact of β-amylase degradation on properties of sugary maize soluble starch particles. Food Chem. 2015;177:1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.101. pmid:25660850
- 15. Svensson B. Protein engineering in the α-amylase family: catalytic mechanism, substrate specificity, and stability. Plant Mol Biol. 1994;25(2):141–57. pmid:8018865
- 16. Shariffa YN, Karim AA, Fazilah A, Zaidul ISM. Enzymatic hydrolysis of granular native and mildly heat-treated tapioca and sweet potato starches at sub-gelatinization temperature. Food Hydrocoll. 2009;23(2):434–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.03.009.
- 17. Sujka M, Jamroz J. Starch granule porosity and its changes by means of amylolysis. Int Agrophys. 2007;21(1):107–13.
- 18. Wu Y, Du X, Ge H, Lv Z. Preparation of microporous starch by glucoamylase and ultrasound. Starch-Starke. 2011;63(4):217–25.
- 19. WeiRong Y, HuiYuan Y. Adsorbent characteristics of porous starch. Starch-Starke. 2002;54(6):260–3.
- 20. Sujka M, Jamroz J. α-Amylolysis of native potato and corn starches—SEM, AFM, nitrogen and iodine sorption investigations. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2009;42(7):1219–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.01.016.
- 21. Sengupta S, Jana ML, Sengupta D, Naskar AK. A note on the estimation of microbial glycosidase activities by dinitrosalicylic acid reagent. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;53:732–5. pmid:10919335
- 22. Sumner JB, Howell SF. A method for determination of saccharase activity. J Biol Chem. 1935;108(1):51–4.
- 23. Huber KC, BeMiller JN. Visualization of channels and cavities of corn and sorghum starch granules. Cereal Chem. 1997;74(5):537–41.
- 24. Chung Y-L, Lai H-M. Molecular and granular characteristics of corn starch modified by HCl-methanol at different temperatures. Carbohydr Polym. 2006;63(4):527–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.10.031.
- 25. Zhou X, Baik B-K, Wang R, Lim S-T. Retrogradation of waxy and normal corn starch gels by temperature cycling. J Cereal Sci 2010;51(1):57–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2009.09.005.
- 26. Lazou A, Krokida M. Functional properties of corn and corn–lentil extrudates. Food Res Int. 2010;43(2):609–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.017.
- 27. Tester RF, Qi X, Karkalas J. Hydrolysis of native starches with amylases. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2006;130:39–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.01.016.
- 28. Sarikaya E, Higasa T, Adachi M, Mikami B. Comparison of degradation abilities of α- and β-amylases on raw starch granules. Process Biochem. 2000;35(7):711–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(99)00133-8.
- 29. Benavent-Gil Y, Rosell CM. Comparison of porous starches obtained from different enzyme types and levels. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;157:533–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.047. pmid:27987959
- 30. Shrestha AK, Blazek J, Flanagan BM, Dhital S, Larroque O, Morell MK, et al. Molecular, mesoscopic and microscopic structure evolution during amylase digestion of maize starch granules. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;90(1):23–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.041. pmid:24751006
- 31. Bertoft E, Annor GA, Shen X, Rumpagaporn P, Seetharaman K, Hamaker BR. Small differences in amylopectin fine structure may explain large functional differences of starch. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;140:113–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.025. pmid:26876834
- 32. Genkina NK, Wikman J, Bertoft E, Yuryev VP. Effects of structural imperfection on gelatinization characteristics of amylopectin starches with A- and B-type crystallinity. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8(7):2329–35. pmid:17579479
- 33. Lauro M, Forsell PM, Suortti MT, Hulleman SHD, Poutanen KS. α-Amylolysis of large barley starch granules. Cereal Chem. 1999;76(6):925–30.
- 34. Li H, Zhu Y, Jiao A, Zhao J, Chen X, Wei B, et al. Impact of α-amylase combined with hydrochloric acid hydrolysis on structure and digestion of waxy rice starch. Int J Biol Macromolec. 2013;55:276–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.01.021.
- 35. Helbert W, Schülein M, Henrissat B. Electron microscopic investigation of the diffusion of Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase into corn starch granules. Int J Biol Macromol. 1996;19(3):165–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0141-8130(96)01123-3. pmid:8910056
- 36. Uthumporn U, Karim AA, Fazilah A. Defatting improves the hydrolysis of granular starch using a mixture of fungal amylolytic enzymes. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;43:441–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.07.060.
- 37. Chen Y, Huang S, Tang Z, Chen X, Zhang Z. Structural changes of cassava starch granules hydrolyzed by a mixture of α-amylase and glucoamylase. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;85(1):272–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.01.047.