Association of a Chromosomal Rearrangement Event with Mouse Posterior Polymorphous Corneal Dystrophy and Alterations in Csrp2bp, Dzank1, and Ovol2 Gene Expression

Anna L. Shen; Susan A. Moran; Edward A. Glover; Norman R. Drinkwater; Rebecca E. Swearingen; Leandro B. Teixeira; Christopher A. Bradfield

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157577

Abstract

We have previously described a mouse model of human posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD) and localized the causative mutation to a 6.2 Mbp region of chromosome 2, termed Ppcd1. We now show that the gene rearrangement linked to mouse Ppcd1 is a 3.9 Mbp chromosomal inversion flanked by 81 Kbp and 542 bp deletions. This recombination event leads to deletion of Csrp2bp Exons 8 through 11, Dzank1 Exons 20 and 21, and the pseudogene Znf133. In addition, we identified translocation of novel downstream sequences to positions adjacent to Csrp2bp Exon 7 and Dzank1 Exon 20. Twelve novel fusion transcripts involving Csrp2bp or Dzank1 linked to downstream sequences have been identified. Eight are expressed at detectable levels in PPCD1 but not wildtype eyes. Upregulation of two Csrp2bp fusion transcripts, as well as upregulation of the adjacent gene, Ovol2, was observed. Absence of the PPCD1 phenotype in animals haploinsufficient for Csrp2bp or both Csrp2bp and Dzank1 rules out haploinsufficiency of these genes as a cause of mouse PPCD1. Complementation experiments confirm that PPCD1 embryonic lethality is due to disruption of Csrp2bp expression. The ocular expression pattern of Csrp2bp is consistent with a role for this protein in corneal development and pathogenesis of PPCD1.

Citation: Shen AL, Moran SA, Glover EA, Drinkwater NR, Swearingen RE, Teixeira LB, et al. (2016) Association of a Chromosomal Rearrangement Event with Mouse Posterior Polymorphous Corneal Dystrophy and Alterations in Csrp2bp, Dzank1, and Ovol2 Gene Expression. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0157577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577

Editor: Michael G. Anderson, University of Iowa, UNITED STATES

Received: December 23, 2015; Accepted: June 1, 2016; Published: June 16, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Shen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The PPCD1 mouse is available from the Jackson Laboratory. Sequence data are available in Supplementary Information or in the NCBI GenBank database under the Accession number KU729003.

Funding: This study was funded by Grant EY021376 from the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH) (nei.nih.gov) to CAB. Portions of this study utilized shared resources supported by the Core Grant for Vision Research funded by the National Eye Institute, NIH, to the University of Wisconsin-Madison (P30 EY016665) and the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, funded by Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA014520 from the National Cancer Institute, NIH (www.cancer.gov). The authors thank the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Mouse Genetics Project, supported by the Wellcome Trust (www.wellcome.ac.uk). NIH grants to Velocigene at Regeneron Inc (U01HG004085) and the CSD Consortium (U01HG004080) funded the generation of gene-targeted ES cells for 8500 genes in the KOMP Program and archived and distributed by the KOMP Repository at UC Davis and Children’s Hospital of Oakland Research Institute (CHORI) (U42RR024244). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD, OMIM #122000) is a rare corneal endothelial dystrophy characterized by the presence of multilayered, metaplastic corneal endothelial cells which display proliferative capacity and epithelial features including microvilli and inappropriate cytokeratin expression [1–4]. Clinical outcomes vary from minimal visual impairment to development of corneal edema, retrocorneal membranes, corneal opacification requiring keratoplasty, and increased intraocular pressure and development of glaucoma as a result of blockage of the iridocorneal angle by proliferating corneal endothelial cells [5, 6]. Recently, PPCD has also been associated with development of astigmatism and steep corneal curvature [7, 8]. The sporadic condition, iridocorneal endothelial syndrome (ICE), bears phenotypic similarity to PPCD and is also associated with increased intraocular pressure and development of glaucoma [9].

Human PPCD has been linked to three chromosomal loci, 20p11.2 (PPCD1), 1p34.3-p32 (PPCD2, COL8A2), and 10p11 (PPCD3, ZEB1). The human PPCD3 locus is the best characterized, with truncating mutations in ZEB1 linked to 9–45% of all PPCD cases depending on the population studied [10–13]. Although Fuch’s corneal endothelial dystrophy (FECD) has not been formally linked to the PPCD3 locus, missense mutations in ZEB1 have been associated with this condition. COL8A2 has been linked to early-onset FECD [14, 15], but linkage of this gene to PPCD has been disputed [14]. Finally, Liskova et al. have proposed that, in the Czech Republic, which has an unusually high prevalence of PPCD, the PPCD1 locus on Chromosome 20 may account for the majority of PPCD cases [16]. Sequencing of coding regions of genes in the human PPCD1 interval as well as next-generation sequencing of the region between D20S48 and D20S190 from a single affected individual had not identified causative mutations [16–18]. However, a recent report has linked mutations in the promoter region of the gene OVOL2 to human PPCD1[19].

Our laboratory has previously described the PPCD1 mouse, which reproduces a hallmark feature of human PPCD, corneal endothelial metaplasia characterized by proliferation of corneal endothelial cells with epithelial features including ectopic pan-cytokeratin expression (cytokeratin AE1/AE3) [20]. Affected animals exhibit a visibly enlarged anterior chamber. The mouse Ppcd1 mutation has been localized to a region of mouse chromosome 2 that is syntenic to the human PPCD1 locus on chromosome 20. Other mouse models that reproduce one or more features of PPCD have also been described. Inactivation of both Col8A1 and Col8A2 produces a keratoglobus-like deep anterior chamber with a thin corneal stroma and decreased numbers of corneal endothelial cells.[21, 22]. Mice haploinsufficient for Zeb1 have been reported to exhibit corneal thickening, increased keratocyte number, and iridocorneal and corneolenticular adhesions [23]. Proliferation and epithelialization of corneal endothelial cells were not observed in either of these models.

We have previously demonstrated that expression of two genes, Csrp2bp and Dzank1, is disrupted in eyes of PPCD1 mice [20]. Now, we more thoroughly describe the chromosomal rearrangement of the mouse Ppcd1 locus, characterize expression of candidate genes in this region, and exclude the hypothesis that haploinsufficiency of Csrp2bp or Csrp2bp and Dzank1 is the cause of the PPCD1 eye abnormalities.

Materials and Methods

Animals

All procedures conformed to the principles embodied in the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research (www.arvo.org). Procedures were also approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison (Protocol Number M00578). Animals were housed in groups of two to four in plastic cages with corncob bedding, maintained on a 12-hour light:dark cycle, and provided with lab chow (Mouse diet 9F 5020; PMI Nutrition International) and water ad lib. DBA/2J (D2) and C57BL6/J (B6) mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor ME. B6N.129S4-Gt(ROSA)26Sor^tm1(FLP1)Dym/J (ROSA-flp, JAX 016226) and B6.C-Tg(CMV-cre)1Cgn/J, JAX 006054) were also obtained from the Jackson Laboratory. The PPCD1 mouse has been described previously [20] and is maintained on the D2 background. The Csrp2bp^{tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi} mouse was obtained from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (International Knockout Mouse Consortium). The Dzank1 ^{tm1a(KOMP)Mbp} mouse was obtained from the KOMP Repository (www.komp.org). The vector, ES cells, and mouse strain for this allele were generated by the trans-NIH Knock-Out Mouse Project (KOMP).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using the software programs Mstat (Dr. Norman Drinkwater, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, http://www.mcardle.wisc.edu/mstat/) and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla CA). P values were determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test (copy number, qPCR) or chi-squared test (complementation).

Isolation and sequencing of BAC clones

A BAC library was prepared and screened by the Clemson University Genomics Institute using PPCD1 liver DNA, as described [24]. Briefly, nuclei were isolated and resuspended in 0.75% Seaplaque low melting point agarose in phosphate buffered saline and dispensed into nuclei plug molds (Bio-Rad, Hercules CA). High molecular weight DNA isolation, Hind III partial digestion, DNA size selection, and preparation of the pIndigoBAC536 cloning vector were conducted according to the methods of Luo and Wing [25]. The size selected high molecular fragments were ligated to the vector and transformed into E. coli strain DH10B (Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA). Recombinant colonies (5,000 per pool) were selected on LB agar plates (22cm X 22cm) supplemented with 12.5 ug/mL chloramphenicol and grown for 14 hours. A total of 40 pools were created for PCR screening. Screening was carried out as described previously [24]. Primers used for PCR screening are shown in S1 Table. Probes used for hybridization are shown in S1 Table. BAC DNA was isolated by alkaline lysis, digested with DNase-free RNase A (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO) and RNase ONE (Promega, Madison WI), followed by phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation.

BAC clones were sequenced by Sanger and Ion Torrent sequencing. For Sanger sequencing, BigDye sequencing reagents were obtained from ThermoFisher (www.thermofisher.com) and used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Ion Torrent sequencing was carried out by the University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center. DNA sequences were visualized using Finch TV (Geospiza, www.geospiza.com). Ion Torrent sequence reads were first aligned to the mm10 reference using TMAP aligner from the Torrent Suite software. Samtools mpileup (http://samtools.sourceforge.net/) was used to generate consensus contigs from the re-sequencing alignments and the consensus contigs were then combined with the raw fastq reads and assembled using the Velvet assembler [26, 27]. Nextgen and Sanger sequences were aligned using the program Seqman (DNASTAR, Madison WI).

Genotyping and PCR

Tail DNA was isolated using the Puregene reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Gentra, Minneapolis MN) and stored in 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 0.1 mM EDTA. PCR primers were designed using Primer3 software [28, 29]. Oligonucleotides were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville IA). Genotyping was carried out by PCR. All primer sequences and their predicted product sizes are listed in S1 Table. All PCR reactions contained 10 mM Tris, pH 9, 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton X100, 1.25 mM MgCl₂, 0.1 mM dNTPs, 0.2 μM of each primer, 2.5 units Taq polymerase (Promega), and 25 ng tail DNA. Cycling conditions were 94°, 2 min; [94°, 30 sec; 58°, 40 sec; 72°, 1 min] for 40 cycles; 72°, 5 min. Products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. Predicted sizes for each genotype are listed in S1 Table. PPCD1 genotyping reactions contained the primers 6330Int19A and Sstr5, to amplify the mutant allele, and Csrp_6R and Csrp_7L, to amplify the wildtype allele. Csrp2bp ^{tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi} genotyping reactions contained the primers Csrp35277F,Csrp35277R, and Cas_R1_Term. Csrp2bp^Ex genotyping reactions contained the primers Csrp35277F, and mCsrpfxR. Genotyping of Dzank1 ^{tm1a(KOMP)Mbp} was carried out using the primers CSD-neoF and CSD-Dzank1-ttR, to amplify the floxed allele. The wildtype allele was amplified with the primers CSD-Dzank1-F and CSD-Dzank1-ttR. The Dzank1^Ex allele was genotyped with the primers CSD-Dzank1-F and CSD-Dzank1-R. Cycling conditions for Dzank1 genotyping were 94°, 5 min; [94°, 15 sec; 65°, 30 sec; 72°, 40 sec] for 10 cycles with 1° decrease/cycle; [94°, 15 sec; 55°, 30 sec; 72°, 40 sec] for 30 cycles; 72°, 5 min.

PCR amplification of sequences across the 5’-breakpoint was carried out using primers listed in S1 Table and the cycling conditions 94°, 2 min; [94°, 30 sec; 50°, 40 sec; 72°, 1 min] for 40 cycles; 72°, 5 min. PCR products were treated with Exonuclease I (Promega) and Shrimp Alkaline phosphatase (Promega) and sequenced by Sanger or cloned into pGEMTEasy (Promega, Madison WI). DNA from individual clones was isolated using the FastPlasmid Miniprep kit (5 Prime, www.5prime.com) and sequenced by Sanger sequencing.

Inverse PCR.

Inverse PCR was carried out as described by Williams et al [30], using Sau3A partial digestion of PPCD1 DNA followed by circularization and amplification with primers flanking the breakpoints identified by the prior Roche-Nimblegen CGH analysis. Briefly, 0.6 μg PPCD1 genomic DNA was partially digested with Sau3A (New England Biolabs, Ipswich MA) and ligated with T4 DNA ligase (Promega, Madison WI) at a concentration of 3 ng/μl. PCR primers were designed using Primer3 software. Oligonucleotides were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville IA). PCR was carried out with High Fidelity Polymerase (Roche, www.lifescience.roche.com) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Cycling conditions were 94°, 2 min; [94°, 30 sec; 62°, 40 sec; 72°, 1 min] for 40 cycles; 72°, 5 min. PCR products were cloned into pGEMTEasy (Promega, Madison WI). DNA from individual clones was isolated using the FastPlasmid Miniprep kit (5 Prime, www.5prime.com) and sequenced by Sanger sequencing. Breakpoints were identified by divergence from the wildtype genomic sequence at a position other than a Sau3A restriction site.

Copy number analysis

Taqman copy number analysis was carried out using the Taqman Copy Number Assays Mm0054041_cn and Mm0005227_cn, specific for Csrp2bp Exon 11 and Csrp2bp Exon 5, respectively, and the Taqman Copy Number Reference Assay (Life Technologies). Reactions were carried out in a final volume of 10 μl, containing 10 ng genomic DNA, 5 μl TaqMan Genotyping Master Mix, 0.5 μl Copy Number Assay (Mm0054041_cn or Mm0005227_cn), 0.5 μl Copy Number Reference Assay, and 2 μl distilled water. Reactions were carried out in quadruplicate. Reactions were carried out on an ABI 7900 realtime PCR machine according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Digital PCR was carried out using ddPCR Supermix for probes, no dUTP (Bio-Rad), in a Bio-Rad QX200 Droplet Digital PCR System, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with primer-probe sets specific for Dzank1 Exon 20 (FAM-labelled) or Vsx1 (HEX labelled). DNA was digested with Mse1 prior to PCR to ensure separation of the primer binding sites. Copy number analysis using the Quantstudio 3D digital PCR system (ThermoFisher, thermofisher.com) was carried out in a volume of 15 μl, containing 32 ng genomic DNA, 7.5 μl Genotyping Master Mix, 0.8 μl gene-specific primer-probe set (Taqman Copy Number Assays Mm0054041_cn or Mm0005227_cn) and 0.8 μl reference primer-probe set (Taqman Copy Number Reference Assay).

Gene expression

Immediately after CO₂ euthanasia, eyes were enucleated and placed in RNAlater. Total RNA was isolated using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, www.qiagen.com). First strand cDNA synthesis was carried out using the Bio-Rad Iscript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions and using the supplied mixture of oligo dT and random hexamer primers. 5’-nuclease primer pairs and probes for Csrp2bp and Dzank1 were designed and synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies. 5’-nuclease qPCR was carried out in a volume of 10 μl, containing 1 μl cDNA, 0.5 μl 20X probe, 5 μl Universal Master Mix (Life Technologies, www.lifetechnologies.com), and 3.5 μl distilled water. Ovol2 gene expression was assayed using the Mm00459038_m1 Taqman Gene Expression Assay and Taqman Gene Expression Master Mix (thermofisher.com), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. SYBR Green qPCR was carried out in a volume of 10 μl, containing 1 μl cDNA, 1 μM forward and reverse primers, 3 μl distilled water, and 5 μl Fast Start SYBR Green Master Mix (Roche, www.lifescience.roche.com). Reactions were carried out on an ABI 7900 realtime PCR machine. At the completion of each SYBR Green run, reaction products were analyzed on a 1% agarose gel to confirm the presence of a single reaction product of the expected size.

3’-RACE.

3’-RACE was carried out using the GeneRacer kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was carried out using Pfu Turbo polymerase (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara CA). Reverse and nested primers are listed in S1 Table. PCR products were cloned into the vector pGEMTEasy (Promega). DNA from individual clones was isolated using the FastPlasmid Miniprep kit and sequenced by Sanger sequencing. Electrophoresis was carried out at the DNA Sequencing Facility, University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center.

Histology

For histological characterization, animals were sacrificed by CO₂ inhalation and enucleated eyes fixed overnight in 10% (v/v) formalin in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.2, dehydrated in graded ethanol, and processed for routine paraffin embedded light microscopy. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or by immunohistochemistry. The primary antibody used was anti-human cytokeratin, clone AE1/AE3, (DAKO, Carpenteria CA), at a dilution of 1:750. Primary antibody was omitted from negative controls. Following incubations with primary antibodies, sections were incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody and avidin-biotinylated peroxidase complex using the Vectastain ABC kit and ImmPACT NovaRed or AMEC Red substrate according to the manufacturer’s instructions. (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame CA).

Eyes were stained for β-galactosidase activity as described by Hogan et al. [31] After staining, eyes were dehydrated in graded ethanol and processed for paraffin embedding. Sections were counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red. For preparation of frozen sections, newborn animals were sacrificed by CO₂ inhalation followed by cervical dislocation. Heads were frozen in OCT compound and sectioned in a cryostat, followed by β-galactosidase staining and photography.

Results

Gene structure of the mouse Ppcd1 locus

The Ppcd1 allele has been backcrossed to DBA/2J (D2) for greater than 27 generations. Heterozygotes exhibit the mouse PPCD1 phenotype described previously [20] and homozygotes do not survive early gestation. Thus, characterization of genomic rearrangements was performed using DNA from viable heterozygous animals. Our previous mapping studies localized the mouse Ppcd1 locus to mouse Chromosome 2, between the markers D2Mit259 and D2Mit282, located at 142.8 Mbp and 148.9 Mbp, respectively on the GRCm38 reference genome. Roche Nimblegen Comparative Genome Hybridization (CGH) service had previously identified the endpoints of a putative 87 Kbp duplication in this region. We have now fully characterized the gene rearrangements in this region by a combination of PCR analysis and BAC cloning and show that the endpoints identified by CGH analysis are actually the breakpoints of a 3.9 Mbp chromosomal inversion and the putative duplication is actually a deletion. The wildtype and mutant Ppcd1 alleles are shown in Fig 1A.

Download:

Fig 1. Structure of the Ppcd1 gene rearrangement and alternative transcripts.

(A) Structure of the Ppcd1 mutant gene. The wildtype map, displaying the region from Ovol2 to Cd93, is shown on top and the mouse Ppcd1 map below. Coordinates are shown at the top. Solid boxes indicate genes (labelled) or sequence blocks. Arrows inside gene boxes indicate the direction of transcription. The heavy arrow and star at positions 144479015 and 148326011 indicate the end points of the inverted segment. The inverted region is indicated by a double line. Brackets indicate deletions. The endpoints of the 81121 bp deletion are shown on the wildtype chromosome as white asterisks, at positions 144397894 and 144479015, in the Csrp2bp and Dzank1 genes. Heavy dotted lines below each map indicate positions of BAC clones. Thin lines indicate splice patterns. Small horizontal arrows indicate the positions of primers. Arrows pointing away from each other indicate primers used for inverse PCR and arrows pointing toward each other indicate primers used to confirm deletion endpoints. (B) Csrp2bp fusion transcripts. Csrp2bp exons are indicated by dark blue solid blocks. Purple blocks indicate positions of downstream sequences spliced to Csrp2bp Exons 6 or 7. Striped blocks indicate intron sequences. Lines indicate splice patterns. Coordinates (GRCm38) are indicated at the top. Heavy black arrows indicate chromosomal orientation. The star indicates the breakpoint of the inversion. (C) Dzank1 fusion transcripts. Dzank1 exons are shown in green. Gray blocks indicate positions of genes. Yellow blocks indicate positions of downstream sequences spliced to Dzank1 Exons 18 or 19. Lines indicate splice patterns. Coordinates (GRCm38) are indicated at the top. Heavy black arrows indicate chromosomal orientation. The diamond indicates the breakpoint of the inversion.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.g001

The mutant Ppcd1 allele consists of a 3.9 Mbp inversion flanked by 81 Kbp and 542 bp deletions at the proximal (5’) and distal (3’) breakpoints (Fig 1A). Note that all coordinates in this manuscript refer to GRCm38 (the 87 Kbp deletion size previously reported is based on GRCm37). The Ppcd1 rearrangement leads to deletion of the 3’-termini of the genes Csrp2bp and Dzank1 and the entire Znf133 pseudogene, concomitant with introduction of novel downstream genomic sequences adjacent to Csrp2bp Exon 7 and Dzank1 Exon 19. The proximal breakpoint of the inversion is a fusion between Chr2:144397894 bp, located in Intron 7 of Csrp2bp, and Chr2:148326011 bp, located in an intergenic region 69366 bp upstream of the gene Sstr4. The distal breakpoint of the inversion is a fusion between Chr2:144479015 bp, located in Intron 19 of Dzank1, and Chr2:148326553 bp, located 68824 bp 5’ of the gene Sstr4. Sequences adjacent to each breakpoint, Chr2:144397894 to 144479015 and Chr2:148326011 to 148326553, are deleted. The endpoints of the larger, 81121 bp (i.e., 81 Kbp) deletion are located in Csrp2bp Intron7 and Dzank1 Intron 19; thus Exons 8 through 11 of Csrp2bp, Exons 20 and 21 of Dzank1, and the entire Znf133 gene are deleted.

The breakpoints of the gene rearrangement were identified by inverse PCR of PPCD1 genomic DNA. The distal breakpoint of the rearrangement was identified by inverse PCR with the primers INV20L/INV20R, which yielded two sequences, one corresponding to the expected wildtype sequence and one containing Dzank1 Intron 19 sequences, in the reverse orientation (Dzank1 is transcribed on the minus strand), followed by sequences located ~69 Kbp 5’ of the gene Sstr4, in the forward orientation. A 542 bp sequence between Chr2:148326011 and Chr2:148326553 is deleted. Fusion of Dzank1 Intron 19 sequences to downstream sequences was confirmed by PCR analysis using the primer pair 6330Int19/Sstr7, which amplified a 221 bp fragment in PPCD1 but not wildtype animals (S1 Fig). S2 Fig shows the alignment of sequences spanning the distal breakpoint with the mouse reference sequence (GRCm38).

The proximal breakpoint was also identified by inverse PCR. The primers INV_5L and INV_5R yielded an 830 bp fragment corresponding to the expected wildtype sequence, as well as an amplicon that contained Csrp2bp Intron 7 sequence in the forward orientation fused to a sequence located ~69 Kbp 5’ of the gene Sstr4, in the reverse orientation. PCR amplification of a 239 bp fragment with primers CRIT28854 and SSTR7 in DNA from PPCD1 but not wildtype animals confirmed fusion of Csrp2bp Intron 7 sequences to the predicted downstream sequences (S3 Fig). The location of the Csrp2bp Intron 7 breakpoint was further confirmed by PCR amplification with a series of primer pairs spanning the breakpoint (S4 Fig). S5 Fig shows alignment of the Ppcd1 assembly sequence spanning the proximal breakpoint with the genomic sequences from Csrp2bp Intron 7 from D2 (shown in S6 Fig) and the reference genome GRCm38.

Two Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements (SINE) are located near the breakpoints. A 181 bp B2_Mm1a element, present in wildtype D2 DNA and the Celera genome, but not B6, is located in Csrp2bp Intron 7, 111 bp 5’ of the proximal breakpoint. A PB1D9 SINE element is located in Dzank1 Intron 19, ~200 bp from the distal breakpoint, in both the D2 and B6 genomes.

Further confirmation of the distal breakpoint was obtained by isolation and sequencing of a BAC clone spanning the distal breakpoint (Fig 1A). Screening of a BAC library constructed from PPCD1 DNA with probes specific for Csrp2bp Exons 7, 9, or 11, or Dzank1 Exons 20 or 21 yielded overlapping clones spanning the wildtype chromosome from Ch2:144286355 to Chr2:14471022, containing the genes Ovol2, Csrp2bp, Znf133, Dzank1, Polr3f, Rbbp9, and Sec23B. Using a probe spanning the distal breakpoint, we obtained one wildtype clone, extending from Chr2:148286314 to Chr2:148444495 and containing the genes Sstr4 and Thbd, and two mutant clones spanning the distal breakpoint, containing Sec23B, Rbbp9, Polr3f, Dzank1 to the breakpoint, and sequences distal to the breakpoint. Sanger and Ion Torrent sequencing of the mutant clones confirmed that the breakpoint was indeed that identified by PCR and consistent with the gene structure shown in Fig 1A. The sequence of the mutant BAC clone has been deposited in GenBank with the accession number KU729003. Screening of the BAC library with probes spanning the proximal breakpoint or probes derived from Csrp2bp Exon 7 yielded only wildtype or nonspecific clones. No clones corresponding to any other rearrangements were found with any of the probes.

Alignment of the sequences spanning the breakpoints indicated that sequences adjacent to each breakpoint, Chr2:144397894 to 144479015 and Chr2:148326011 to 148326553, are deleted. Although the endpoints of the 81 Kbp deletion correspond very closely to the endpoints of the sequence previously identified as duplicated by Nimblegen CGH analysis, the data are consistent with hemizygous deletion, not duplication, of this sequence. To resolve the copy number discrepancy, the copy number of the 81 Kbp segment was confirmed by three independent copy number analyses (Table 1). Taqman copy number analysis was carried out using the probes from Csrp2bp Exon 5, located outside the 81 Kbp segment, and Csrp2bp Exon 11, located inside the segment. We found that two copies of Csrp2bp Exon 5 are present in both wildtype and PPCD1 DNA. However, the copy number of Csrp2bp Exon 11 is two in wildtype DNA and only one in PPCD1 DNA, consistent with deletion of sequences distal to Exon 7 of Csrp2bp. Similar results were obtained with digital PCR using probes for Vsx1, located just outside the mapped PPCD1 critical region, and Csrp2bp Exon 11 and Dzank1 Exon 20, both located inside the putative deletion. The copy numbers of both Csrp2bp Exon 11 and Dzank1 Exon 20 were found to be 2 in wildtype DNA and 1 in PPCD1 DNA using two different digital PCR platforms. The precision of the digital PCR is sufficient to distinguish between 1 and 1.5 copies and confirms that the 81 Kbp segment is indeed deleted rather than duplicated. The Nimblegen CGH service is no longer in existence and it is not possible to further examine the basis for the incorrect copy number assignment.

Download:

Table 1. Determination of PPCD1 copy number.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.t001

Fusion transcripts produced by the PPCD1 Inversion

The Ppcd1 inversion translocates sequences normally located in an intergenic region, approximately 3.9 Mbp 3’ of Csrp2bp and 70 Kbp 5’ of the gene Sstr4, to base 3748 of Csrp2bp Intron 7. In addition to wildtype Csrp2bp transcripts, 5 alternative fusion transcripts involving Csrp2bp were detected by 3’-RACE. Novel Csrp2bp fusion transcripts produced as a result of the Ppcd1 rearrangement are shown in Fig 1B. The Csrp2bp C1 transcript contains Exons 1 through 7 followed by Intron 7 bases 1 through 992. This sequence is then spliced to Intron 7, bases 3662 to 3748, in the forward orientation, followed by the sequence Chr2:148326011 to 148325790, in the inverse orientation. The Csrp2bp C2 transcript contains Exons 1 through 7 followed by 1209 bp of Intron 7 sequence spliced to the same downstream sequence found in the C1 transcript. No known coding sequences are located in this region. Termination codons are located 112 bp past Exon 7, leading to, at most, addition of 37 extra amino acids. These amino acids do not contain any known protein domain structure. Two transcripts where Exon 7 is directly spliced to downstream sequences (C3 and C5) and one where Exon 6 is spliced directly to downstream sequences (C4), were also identified.

The inversion event also fuses genomic sequence beginning at Chr2:144326553, 30487 bp 5’ of the gene Sstr4, to base 1966 of Dzank1 Intron 19. Fig 1C shows the structures of 7 Dzank1 fusion transcripts arising from the PPCD1 inversion. Splicing occurs from either Exon 18 or Exon 19 of Dzank1 to the downstream sequences. The Dzank1 D1 through D4 and D7 transcripts are each the product of a single splice event from Dzank1 Exon 18 or 19 to a single downstream sequence. In the case of Dzank1 D5 and D6 transcripts, two splice events were observed, to generate the equivalent of two additional exons fused to Dzank1. All the novel sequences originate upstream of the Sstr4 start site, or, in one case, in the intergenic region between the genes Thbd and Cd93.

Expression of normal and fusion transcripts.

Previous qPCR results [20] demonstrated decreased expression of Csrp2bp Exons 9 and 10 in PPCD1 eyes, which is consistent with the observed gene rearrangement. To investigate expression levels of fusion transcripts relative to expression levels of the wildtype transcript, qPCR primer pairs specific for the wildtype or the novel transcripts were designed (S1 Table). In agreement with previous qPCR results, levels of the wildtype Csrp2bp and Dzank1 transcripts (i.e., those containing Csrp2bp Exons 7 and 8 and Dzank1 Exons 19 and 20) in PPCD1 eyes are approximately half that observed in wildtype eyes (Fig 2A). In wildtype eyes, expression levels of Csrp2bp fusion transcripts ranges from undetectable to less than 0.1% of the wildtype transcript. In PPCD1 eyes, Csrp2bp transcripts C1, C2, C3, and C5 are expressed at levels readily detectable by qPCR. Fig 2B shows that the Csrp2bp C1 and C2 transcripts are expressed at levels nearly 4 times that of the wildtype Csrp2bp transcript. Csrp2bp C3 and C5 transcripts are also detectable at low levels (< 5% of wildtype) in PPCD1 eyes.

Download:

Fig 2. qPCR of Csrp2bp and Dzank1 transcripts.

(A) Expression levels of Csrp2bp and Dzank1 wildtype transcripts. Solid bars are wildtype and striped bars indicate PPCD1. Values are expressed relative to Gapdh. * indicates P < 0.05. (B) Expression of Csrp2bp fusion transcripts. Values are expressed relative to the expression level of the wildtype transcript. (C) Expression of Dzank1 fusion transcripts. Values are expressed relative to the expression level of the wildtype transcript. All values are mean ± SD, n = 3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.g002

Expression levels of Dzank1 fusion transcripts in wildtype eyes are also less than 0.1% of the wildtype Dzank1 transcript. Four Dzank1 fusion transcripts (D1, D3, D5, and D6) are detectable by qPCR. Fig 2C shows that these are expressed in PPCD1 eyes at levels ranging from 12% to 37% of the Dzank1 wildtype transcript. PCR amplification of the remaining transcripts (Csrp2bp C4 and Dzank1 D2, D4, and D7), in which much of the sequence fused to Csrp2bp or Dzank1 was repetitive, yielded nonspecific products and were not further evaluated.

Csrp2bp and Dzank1 expression patterns

To examine the sites of expression of Csrp2bp and Dzank1, we employed “Knockout First” mouse models, which carry a β-Gal-neo cassette [32] expressing β-galactosidase (LacZ) activity under control of either the Csrp2bp or Dzank1 promoter. The Csrp2bp ^{tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi} allele, generated by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and hereafter referred to as Csrp2bp^tm1a, carries a β-Gal-neo cassette in Intron 2 that disrupts the Csrp2bp coding sequence and allows identification of the Csrp2bp-expressing tissues, plus loxP sites flanking Exon 3 allowing Cre-mediated excision. For details, see http://www.mousephenotype.org/data/alleles/project_id?ikmc_project_id=38090. Similarly, the Dzank1 ^{tm1a(KOMP)Mbp} (Dzank1^tm1a) allele carries a β-Gal-neo cassette in Intron 3 and loxP sites flanking Exon 4 (https://www.komp.org/ProductSheet.php?cloneID=663824).

β-galactosidase staining of eyes from animals carrying the Csrp2b ^tm1a allele indicates that Csrp2bp is expressed at significant levels in the eye. In the adult eye, Csrp2bp expression was observed in the iris and ciliary body, corneal endothelium, trabecular meshwork, lens, retinal ganglion cells and retinal pigment epithelium (Fig 3A–3C). In neonatal animals, Csrp2bp expression was observed in the developing iridocorneal angle and corneal endothelium (Fig 3D). Ocular expression of Dzank1 is more restricted (Fig 4). Dzank1-driven β-galactosidase activity was observed only in the retinal ganglion cells and inner nuclear layer. Dzank1-driven β-galactosidase expression was not observed in the corneal endothelium or iridocorneal angle.

Download:

Fig 3. Expression of Csrp2bp in the eye.

Blue staining represents Csrp2bp expression. (A) Adult (3 months) iridocorneal angle, B6/albino background. ce, corneal epithelium; cn, corneal endothelium; Ir, iris; Cb, ciliary body. (B) Adult central cornea (B6/albino) (C) Retina (B6/albino). rgc, retinal ganglion cells; ONL, outer nuclear layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; rpe, retinal pigment epithelium. (D) Neonatal (P0) iridocorneal angle (B6). The arrow points to the developing iridocorneal angle.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.g003

Download:

Fig 4. Expression of Dzank1 in the eye.

Blue staining represents Dzank1 expression. Background is B6. Age, 1 month. (A) Iridocorneal angle. ce, corneal epithelium; cn, corneal endothelium; Ir, iris; Ret, retina. (B) Retina. rgc, retinal ganglion cell; INL, inner nuclear layer; ONL, outer nuclear layer; rpe, retinal pigment epithelium.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.g004

Ocular phenotypes associated with Csrp2bp and Dzank1 deficiency

To test the hypothesis that haploinsufficiency of Csrp2bp and Dzank1 is responsible for mouse PPCD1, the ocular phenotypes of animals heterozygous for both genes were examined. The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium has reported phenotypic changes for both Csrp2bp ^tm1a and Dzank1 ^tm1a homozygous null animals, consistent with effective disruption of gene expression by the β-Gal-neo cassette (http://www.mousephenotype.org) [33]. To remove any possibility of confounding results due to disruption of expression of neighboring genes by neo, Csrp2b ^tm1a/+ mice were crossed to B6N.129S4-Gt(ROSA)26Sor^tm1(FLP1)Dym/J (ROSA flp) mice to remove the β-Gal-neo cassette and to B6.C-Tg(CMV-cre)₁Cgn/J (CMV-cre) mice to delete the targeted exon. The resulting allele, in which both the β-Gal-neo cassette and Exon 3 of Csrp2bp are deleted, is designated Csrp2bp^Ex. The Csrp2b ^tm1a and Csrp2bp^Ex alleles were each backcrossed onto the D2 background for >7 generations. No phenotypic differences were observed between the Csrp2b ^tm1a and Csrp2bp^Ex alleles.

Eyes of Csrp2bp^Ex/+ animals are of normal size as late as 8 months of age and the anterior chamber is not enlarged (Fig 5). Histologic examination of H&E-stained eyes did not reveal evidence of epithelized corneal endothelium at 3 or 8 months of age (Fig 6A and 6B). In contrast to the marked pan-cytokeratin immunoreactivity present as early as 3 weeks of age in PPCD1 animals on the D2 background [20], pan-cytokeratin immunoreactivity is absent in Csrp2bp ^tm1a/+ eyes (Fig 6C).

Download:

Fig 5. Lack of anterior chamber enlargement in Csrp2bp^Ex/+ and Csrp2bp^Ex/Dzank1^tm1a double heterozygous mice.

(A) PPCD1/D2 mouse, age 3 weeks. (B) Csrp2bp^Ex/+ mouse, age 8 months. (C) Csrp2bp^Ex/Dzank1^tm1a double heterozygote, (D2xB6 F1 background), age 5 months. (D) Wildtype B6 mouse, age 5 months. Magnification 12.5X.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.g005

Download:

Fig 6. Lack of corneal endothelial cell metaplasia in Csrp2bp haploinsufficient mice.

(A) Csrp2bp^tm1a/+, age 3 months, H &E. (B) Csrp2bp^Ex/+, age 8 months, H&E. (C) Csrp2bp^tm1a/+, age 2 months, pan-cytokeratin immunohistochemistry. Ir, iris; ce, corneal epithelium; cn, corneal endothelium; Cb, ciliary body.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.g006

To determine if combined haploinsufficiency of Csrp2bp and Dzank1 is responsible for mouse PPCD1, Csrp2bp^Ex/+ animals on the D2 background were crossed to Dzank1 ^tm1a/+ animals on the B6 background to generate Csrp2bp^Ex/Dzank ^tm1a double heterozygotes. Although development of visibly enlarged eyes is delayed on the B6 background, we have previously shown that 76% of PPCD1 animals on the D2 x B6 F1 genetic background exhibit grossly observable enlarged eyes at 3 months of age [20]. Visual examination of eyes from four 4–5 month old Csrp2bp^Ex/Dzank ^tm1a double heterozygotes did not reveal visibly enlarged eyes (P < .002 compared to PPCD1 D2 X B6 F1 animals). Lack of anterior chamber enlargement was confirmed by examination of histological sections (Fig 5C) and the iridocorneal angle appears normal (Fig 7).

Download:

Fig 7. Normal appearance of the iridocorneal angle of Csrp2bp^Ex/ Dzank1^tm1a double heterozygous mice.

Csrp2bp^Ex/ Dzank1^tm1a double heterozygote, age 5 months, H&E. ce, corneal epithelium; cn, corneal endothelium.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.g007

PPCD1-associated embryonic lethality is due to disruption of Csrp2bp

While heterozygosity of Ppcd1 leads to the PPCD1 ocular phenotype, homozygosity of Ppcd1 leads to embryonic lethality [20]. Crosses between Csrp2bp^tm1a heterozygotes yield only 10% of the expected number of Csrp2bp ^tm1a homozygous offspring, while Dzank1^tm1a homozygotes are viable (www.mousephenotyping.org) [33]. Evidence that homozygous disruption of Csrp2bp is responsible for embryonic lethality in PPCD1 animals comes from results of a complementation analysis. Table 2 presents the results of crosses between Csrp2bp^Ex/+ and Ppcd1/+ animals, showing that the combination of the Ppcd1 and Csrp2bp^Ex alleles results in embryonic lethality. Similar results were obtained using Csrp2bp ^tm1a/+ animals. In both cases, the presence of the wildtype Dzank1, Ovol2, and Znf133 alleles is unable to rescue the embryonic lethality associated with the Ppcd1 allele. In contrast, the presence of a wildtype Csrp2bp allele and a Dzank1 ^tm1a allele does rescue the embryonic lethality. Rescue by the wildtype Csrp2bp allele was incomplete, with approximately 50% of Ppcd1/Dzank1 ^tm1a double heterozygotes dying prior to birth.

Download:

Table 2. Complementation Analysis of PPCD1 Embryonic Lethality.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.t002

Ovol2 gene expression

Ovol2 transcripts are present at low but detectable levels in the eye. Fig 8 shows that Ovol2 is significantly upregulated in 14-day old but not 12-day old mouse eyes.

Download:

Fig 8. qPCR of Ovol2.

Expression levels of Ovol2 in wildtype and PPCD1 eyes at 12 and 14 days of age. Solid bars indicate wildtype and striped bars indicate PPCD1. Values are expressed relative to Gapdh. n = 6 for each genotype at 12 days and n = 3 for each genotype at 14 days. *, P = 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.g008

Discussion

We have now fully characterized the chromosomal rearrangement that causes the PPCD1 phenotype. In particular, we have now discovered that the Ppcd1 locus contains a 3.9 Mbp chromosomal inversion coupled to 81 Kbp and 549 bp deletions. We have identified novel transcripts arising from Csrp2bp and/or Dzank1, as well as upregulation of an adjacent gene, Ovol2 that may be responsible for corneal endothelial metaplasia. This potential disease mechanism is consistent with the Ppcd1 chromosomal rearrangement, the autosomal dominant inheritance of PPCD1, and the phenotypes of Csrp2bp1 and Csrp2bp1/Dzank1 haploinsufficient animal models. Evidence against a role for Znf133 haploinsufficiency includes the observations that this locus encodes a pseudogene with no associated protein product and that extensive sequencing of human PPCD1 DNA has not revealed mutation or deletion of this gene [16].

Evidence that simple haploinsufficiency of Csrp2bp does not cause mouse PPCD1 is the observation that our Csrp2bp ^tm1a/+ and Csrp2bp^Ex/+ mice do not present the mouse PPCD1 phenotype characterized by corneal endothelial cell epithelialization and proliferation and early enlargement of the anterior chamber. An enlarged anterior chamber has not been reported by the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (http://www.mousephenotype.org) in Csrp2bp^tm1a heterozygous or homozygous mice. No eye abnormalities were reported in a separate Csrp2bp-haploinsufficient mouse line [34]. However, phenotyping of Csrp2bp ^{tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi} homozygotes by the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium has identified a number of eye abnormalities, including corneal opacity, in a fraction of homozygotes. These abnormalities are distinct from those observed in mouse PPCD1, but are consistent with a role for Csrp2bp in corneal development. No eye abnormalities have been reported for Dzank1 null animals by the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium. Mice haploinsufficient for both Csrp2bp and Dzank1 also do not exhibit PPCD1. Although these double haploinsufficient results must be confirmed in animals lacking the β-Gal-neo cassette and crossed fully onto the D2 background, evidence to date suggests that haploinsufficiency of Csrp2bp, alone or in concert with Dzank1, does not produce the corneal phenotypes seen in the PPCD1 mouse.

The inability of Csrp2bp or Csrp2bp/Dzank1 combined haploinsufficiency to produce the mouse PPCD1 phenotype suggests a dominant effect of either the truncated gene product or a novel fusion gene product. In support of this potential mechanism, we have identified a total of 12 alternative transcripts produced as a result of the Ppcd1 gene rearrangement, one or more of which may act in a dominant manner to deregulate signalling pathways in corneal endothelial cells or precursors. Of particular interest are Csrp2bp transcripts C1 and C2, which are overexpressed in PPCD1 eyes.

While this manuscript was under review, Davidson et al. reported linkage of mutations in the promoter region of Ovol2 to human PPCD1 and proposed that human PPCD1 was caused by overexpression of Ovol2 [19]. Fig 8 provides evidence of upregulation of Ovol2 in 14-day old, but not 12-day old, PPCD1 mouse eyes. The Ovol2 gene is located adjacent to Csrp2bp, approximately 37 Kbp 5’ of Csrp2bp Exon 1 and 66 Kbp from the 5’-breakpoint of the mouse PPCD1 inversion. Transcription occurs in the reverse orientation. Chromosomal rearrangements are known to perturb expression of neighboring genes [35, 36]; the relatively close proximity and head-to-head orientation of Ovol2 and Csrp2bp are consistent with a direct effect of the PPCD1 chromosomal rearrangement on Ovol2 transcription. Alternatively, Csrp2bp and/or Dzank1 mutant transcripts may influence Ovol2 expression and/or function. Further studies on the localization and time course of expression of these three genes are underway to investigate their respective contributions to PPCD1 pathogenesis.

Although Csrp2bp haploinsufficiency does not produce the ocular PPCD1 phenotype, our results are consistent with the conclusion that PPCD1 embryonic lethality is due to homozygous disruption of Csrp2bp. Wildtype Dzank1, Ovol2, and Znf133 alleles are completely unable to rescue embryonic lethality, while introduction of the wildtype Csrp2bp does rescue Ppcd1-associated embryonic lethality. Rescue is incomplete, which may be due to (1) the presence of neo in the Dzank1^Tm1a allele that interferes with Csrp2bp expression, (2) the ability of wildtype Dzank1 to partially compensate for loss of Csrp2bp function, or (3) the inability of wildtype Csrp2bp to completely compensate for effects of the mutant alternative transcripts. Partial compensation by Dzank1 and inability of wildtype Csrp2bp to compensate for the Ppcd1 mutation are both consistent with the observation of complete embryonic lethality in Ppcd1 homozygotes [20] versus partial embryonic lethality of the Csrp2bp knockout mouse.

The Ppcd1 gene rearrangement is expected to alter the functional properties of both the CSRP2BP and DZANK1 proteins, while human PPCD1 OVOL2 mutations are associated with overexpression rather than a protein structural change. CSRP2BP is a component of the “Ada two A containing” (ATAC) histone acetyltransferase complex, components of which include p300 and P/CAF, transcriptional coactivators involved in Zeb1 signaling [34, 37–42]. Deletion of Csrp2bp Exons 8–11 removes the catalytic histone acetyltransferase domain while leaving intact the amino terminus of the protein, which has the potential to disrupt ATAC function in a dominant negative manner. Although the function of Dzank1 is unknown, its structure also suggests that it may act as a transcription factor. The PPCD1 chromosomal rearrangement deletes carboxy terminal ankyrin repeats capable of mediating of protein-protein interactions, while leaving the double zinc ribbon DNA-binding domain intact. Finally, overexpression of a wildtype OVOL2 protein may cause PPCD1 via increased repression of Zeb1 transcription [19, 43].

In conclusion, we have fully characterized the chromosomal rearrangement that causes the PPCD1 phenotype and provide further evidence that disruption of Csrp2bp, Dzank1, and/or Ovol2, singly or in concert, is responsible for the corneal endothelial metaplasia. A number of factors favor Csrp2bp disruption as causative for mouse PPCD1. These include Csrp2bp gene expression in the corneal endothelium, upregulation of Csrp2bp alternative transcripts in affected eyes, inability of the Csrp2bp null allele to complement Ppcd1-mediated embryonic lethality, and the presence of corneal abnormalities in Csrp2bp null animals. The reported associations of CSRP2BP and OVOL2 with Zeb1 signaling [34, 40–43], known to be disrupted in human PPCD [12, 13], support a role for either or both of these proteins in PPCD1.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. PCR of distal (3’) breakpoint.

Genotypes are indicated at the top and sizes are indicated at the right. +/+denotes wildtype; +/- denotes PPCD1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Alignment of PPCD1 sequence spanning the distal (3’) breakpoint with GRCm38.

The sequence begins in Dzank1 Intron 19 and spans the breakpoint. The top sequence is that of BAC PL2195, corresponding to the PPCD1 mutant allele. The lower sequence is GRCm38. The PB1D9 SINE element is indicated in bold.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. PCR of proximal (5’) breakpoint.

Genotypes are indicated at the top and sizes are indicated at the left. +/+denotes wildtype; +/- denotes PPCD1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. PCR amplification of sequences spanning the proximal breakpoint.

Genotypes are indicated at the top and sizes (bp) at the left. +/+denotes wildtype; +/- denotes PPCD1. Primers used were: A, CRIT28854/Sstr7; B, OL8139/CRIT28854; C, OL8140/CRIT28854; D, OL8141/CRIT28854; E, Sstr7/OL8128; F, OL8139/OL8128; G, OL8140/OL8128; H, OL8141/OL8128; I, Sstr7/OL8129; J, OL8139/OL8129; K, OL8140/OL8129; L, OL8141/8129; M, Sstr7OL/8130; N, OL8139/OL8130; O, OL8140/OL8130.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Alignment of PPCD1 sequence spanning the proximal (5’) breakpoint with Csrp2bp Intron 7 and GRCm38.

The top sequence is that of PPCD1, derived from sequencing of PCR amplicons shown in S1D Fig. The lower sequence is that of Csrp2bp Intron 7 sequence (labelled Int_7), obtained from the wildtype BAC clone, PL2173 (shown in S1E Fig), or GRCm38. The B2_Mm1a SINE element, present in D2 but not B6, is shown in bold. Positions of oligonucleotides used for determination of the sequence spanning the breakpoint are indicated by arrows.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.s005

(DOCX)

S6 Fig. Sequence of D2 Csrp2bp Intron 7.

Sequence derived from the wildtype BAC clone, PL2173.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.s006

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Primers used in this study.

Primers are arranged in pairs. Amplicon sizes, if applicable, and the usage of each primer or primer pair are indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157577.s007

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Satoshi Kinoshita and Rochely V. Luna Serrano for assistance with histology and immunohistochemistry, Devon Hunter-Schlichting and Mele Avila for assistance with genotyping, Dr. Raymond Miller of Bio-Rad Laboratories for assistance with copy number determination by digital PCR, Dr. Derek Pavelec of the University of Wisconsin Bioinformatics Resource Center with assistance with Nextgen sequence analysis, Dr. Christopher Saski of Clemson University Genomics Institute for construction of the BAC library, and Dr. Jacqui White of Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute for helpful discussions on the Csrp2bp ^{tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi} mouse. We thank the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Mouse Genetics Project (Sanger MGP) and the KOMP Repository (www.komp.org) for the Csrp2bp ^{tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi} and Dzank1 ^{tm1a(KOMP)Mbp} mouse strains.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CAB ALS SAM NRD. Performed the experiments: ALS SAM EAG RES. Analyzed the data: ALS SAM NRD LBT CAB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NRD. Wrote the paper: ALS SAM CAB.

References

1. Brandt JD. Specific types of glaucoma—congenital glaucoma. In: Yanoff SMPaM, editor. Ophthalmology, 1st Edition. Philadelphia: Mosby; 1999. p. 12.0.2.
2. Anderson NJ, Badawi DY, Grossniklaus HE, Stulting RD. Posterior polymorphous membranous dystrophy with overlapping features of iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(4):624–5. pmid:11296040.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Cockerham GC, Laver NV, Hidayat AA, McCoy DL. An immunohistochemical analysis and comparison of posterior polymorphous dystrophy with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Cornea. 2002;21(8):787–91. pmid:12410038.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Schmedt T, Silva MM, Ziaei A, Jurkunas U. Molecular bases of corneal endothelial dystrophies. Exp Eye Res. 2012;95(1):24–34. Epub 2011/08/23. pmid:21855542; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3273549.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Cibis G, Krachmer J, Phelps C, Weingest T. Clinical spectrum of posterior polymorphous dystrophy. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1977;95:1529–37.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Heon E, Mathers WD, Alward WL, Weisenthal RW, Sunden SL, Fishbaugh JA, et al. Linkage of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy to 20q11. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4(3):485–8. Epub 1995/03/01. pmid:7795607.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Evans CJ, Liskova P, Dudakova L, Hrabcikova P, Horinek A, Jirsova K, et al. Identification of six novel mutations in ZEB1 and description of the associated phenotypes in patients with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 3. Annals of human genetics. 2015;79(1):1–9. Epub 2014/12/03. pmid:25441224.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Aldave AJ, Ann LB, Frausto RF, Nguyen CK, Yu F, Raber IM. Classification of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy as a corneal ectatic disorder following confirmation of associated significant corneal steepening. JAMA ophthalmology. 2013;131(12):1583–90. Epub 2013/10/12. pmid:24113819; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3888803.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Howell D, Damms T, Burchette JL, Green WR. Endothelial metaplasia in the iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(9):1896–901. pmid:9286281
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Liskova P, Palos M, Hardcastle AJ, Vincent AL. Further genetic and clinical insights of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 3. JAMA ophthalmology. 2013;131(10):1296–303. Epub 2013/06/29. pmid:23807282.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Liskova P, Tuft SJ, Gwilliam R, Ebenezer ND, Jirsova K, Prescott Q, et al. Novel mutations in the ZEB1 gene identified in Czech and British patients with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. Hum Mutat. 2007;28(6):638. Epub 2007/04/18. pmid:17437275; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2696796.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Aldave AJ, Yellore VS, Yu F, Bourla N, Sonmez B, Salem AK, et al. Posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy is associated with TCF8 gene mutations and abdominal hernia. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143(21):2549–56. pmid:17935237.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Krafchak CM, Pawar H, Moroi SE, Sugar A, Lichter PR, Mackey DA, et al. Mutations in TCF8 cause posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy and ectopic expression of COL4A3 by corneal endothelial cells. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77(5):694–708. Epub 2005/10/28. S0002-9297(07)63355-2 [pii] pmid:16252232; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1271382.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Aldave AJ, Han J, Frausto RF. Genetics of the corneal endothelial dystrophies: an evidence-based review. Clin Genet. 2013;84(2):109–19. Epub 2013/05/15. pmid:23662738; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3885339.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Biswas S, Munier FL, Yardley J, Hart-Holden N, Perveen R, Cousin P, et al. Missense mutations in COL8A2, the gene encoding the alpha2 chain of type VIII collagen, cause two forms of corneal endothelial dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(21):2415–23. pmid:11689488.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Liskova P, Gwilliam R, Filipec M, Jirsova K, Reinstein Merjava S, Deloukas P, et al. High prevalence of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in the Czech Republic; linkage disequilibrium mapping and dating an ancestral mutation. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45495. Epub 2012/10/11. pmid:23049806; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3458081.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Aldave AJ, Yellore VS, Vo RC, Kamal KM, Rayner SA, Plaisier CL, et al. Exclusion of positional candidate gene coding region mutations in the common posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1 candidate gene interval. Cornea. 2009;28(7):801–7. Epub 2009/07/04. pmid:19574904; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2714875.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Lai IN, Yellore VS, Rayner SA, D'Silva NC, Nguyen CK, Aldave AJ. The utility of next-generation sequencing in the evaluation of the posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1 locus. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2829–38. Epub 2011/01/05. pmid:21203404; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3012649.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Davidson AE, Liskova P, Evans CJ, Dudakova L, Noskova L, Pontikos N, et al. Autosomal-Dominant Corneal Endothelial Dystrophies CHED1 and PPCD1 Are Allelic Disorders Caused by Non-coding Mutations in the Promoter of OVOL2. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(1):75–89. pmid:26749309.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Shen AL, O'Leary KA, Dubielzig RR, Drinkwater N, Murphy CJ, Kasper CB, et al. The PPCD1 mouse: characterization of a mouse model for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy and identification of a candidate gene. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12213. Epub 2010/09/03. pmid:20808945; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2922377.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Hopfer U, Fukai N, Hopfer H, Wolf G, Joyce N, Li E, et al. Targeted disruption of Col8a1 and Col8a2 genes in mice leads to anterior segment abnormalities in the eye. Faseb J. 2005;19(10):1232–44. pmid:16051690.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Adiguzel E, Hou G, Mulholland D, Hopfer U, Fukai N, Olsen B, et al. Migration and growth are attenuated in vascular smooth muscle cells with type VIII collagen-null alleles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26(1):56–61. pmid:16269661.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Liu Y, Peng X, Tan J, Darling DS, Kaplan HJ, Dean DC. Zeb1 mutant mice as a model of posterior corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(5):1843–9. Epub 2008/04/26. 49/5/1843 [pii] pmid:18436818; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2504018.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Hickner PV, Debruyn B, Lovin DD, Mori A, Saski CA, Severson DW. Enhancing genome investigations in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus via BAC library construction and characterization. BMC research notes. 2011;4:358. Epub 2011/09/15. pmid:21914202; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3180476.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Luo M, Wing RA. An improved method for plant BAC library construction. Methods Mol Biol. 2003;236:3–20. Epub 2003/09/23. pmid:14501055.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18(5):821–9. Epub 2008/03/20. pmid:18349386; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2336801.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e11147. Epub 2010/07/02. pmid:20593022; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2892488.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, et al. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(15):e115. Epub 2012/06/26. pmid:22730293; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3424584.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Koressaar T, Remm M. Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(10):1289–91. Epub 2007/03/24. pmid:17379693.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Williams M, Rainville IR, Nicklas JA. Use of inverse PCR to amplify and sequence breakpoints of HPRT deletion and translocation mutations. environmental and molecular mutagenesis. 2002;39(1):22–32. pmid:11813293
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Brigid H. Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual: 2nd ed. Plainview, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1994.; 1994.
32. Skarnes WC, Rosen B, West AP, Koutsourakis M, Bushell W, Iyer V, et al. A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature. 2011;474(7351):337–42. Epub 2011/06/17. pmid:21677750; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3572410.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. White JK, Gerdin AK, Karp NA, Ryder E, Buljan M, Bussell JN, et al. Genome-wide generation and systematic phenotyping of knockout mice reveals new roles for many genes. Cell. 2013;154(2):452–64. Epub 2013/07/23. pmid:23870131; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3717207.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Guelman S, Kozuka K, Mao Y, Pham V, Solloway MJ, Wang J, et al. The Double-Histone-Acetyltransferase Complex ATAC Is Essential for Mammalian Development. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29(5):1176–88. pmid:19103755
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Henrichsen CN, Vinckenbosch N, Zollner S, Chaignat E, Pradervand S, Schutz F, et al. Segmental copy number variation shapes tissue transcriptomes. Nat Genet. 2009;41(4):424–9. Epub 2009/03/10. pmid:19270705.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Harewood L, Fraser P. The impact of chromosomal rearrangements on regulation of gene expression. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(R1):R76–82. Epub 2014/06/08. pmid:24907073.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Postigo AA. Opposing functions of ZEB proteins in the regulation of the TGFbeta/BMP signaling pathway. Embo J. 2003;22(10):2443–52. pmid:12743038.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Suganuma T, Mushegian A, Swanson SK, Abmayr SM, Florens L, Washburn MP, et al. The ATAC acetyltransferase complex coordinates MAP kinases to regulate JNK target genes. Cell. 2010;142(5):726–36. Epub 2010/09/04. pmid:20813260.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Krebs AR, Karmodiya K, Lindahl-Allen M, Struhl K, Tora L. SAGA and ATAC histone acetyl transferase complexes regulate distinct sets of genes and ATAC defines a class of p300-independent enhancers. Mol Cell. 2011;44(3):410–23. Epub 2011/11/08. pmid:22055187.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Peinado H, Olmeda D, Cano A. Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype? Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(6):415–28. pmid:17508028.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Wang Y-L, Faiola F, Xu M, Pan S, Martinez E. Human ATAC Is a GCN5/PCAF-containing Acetylase Complex with a Novel NC2-like Histone Fold Module That Interacts with the TATA-binding Protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283(49):33808–15. pmid:18838386
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Gheldof A, Hulpiau P, van Roy F, De Craene B, Berx G. Evolutionary functional analysis and molecular regulation of the ZEB transcription factors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(15):2527–41. Epub 2012/02/22. pmid:22349261.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Roca H, Hernandez J, Weidner S, McEachin RC, Fuller D, Sud S, et al. Transcription factors OVOL1 and OVOL2 induce the mesenchymal to epithelial transition in human cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76773. Epub 2013/10/15. pmid:24124593; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3790720.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Brandt JD. Specific types of glaucoma—congenital glaucoma. In: Yanoff SMPaM, editor. Ophthalmology, 1st Edition. Philadelphia: Mosby; 1999. p. 12.0.2.

[ref2] 2. Anderson NJ, Badawi DY, Grossniklaus HE, Stulting RD. Posterior polymorphous membranous dystrophy with overlapping features of iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(4):624–5. pmid:11296040.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] PubMed/NCBI

[5] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Cockerham GC, Laver NV, Hidayat AA, McCoy DL. An immunohistochemical analysis and comparison of posterior polymorphous dystrophy with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Cornea. 2002;21(8):787–91. pmid:12410038.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] PubMed/NCBI

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Schmedt T, Silva MM, Ziaei A, Jurkunas U. Molecular bases of corneal endothelial dystrophies. Exp Eye Res. 2012;95(1):24–34. Epub 2011/08/23. pmid:21855542; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3273549.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Cibis G, Krachmer J, Phelps C, Weingest T. Clinical spectrum of posterior polymorphous dystrophy. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1977;95:1529–37.
View Article
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Heon E, Mathers WD, Alward WL, Weisenthal RW, Sunden SL, Fishbaugh JA, et al. Linkage of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy to 20q11. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4(3):485–8. Epub 1995/03/01. pmid:7795607.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Evans CJ, Liskova P, Dudakova L, Hrabcikova P, Horinek A, Jirsova K, et al. Identification of six novel mutations in ZEB1 and description of the associated phenotypes in patients with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 3. Annals of human genetics. 2015;79(1):1–9. Epub 2014/12/03. pmid:25441224.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Aldave AJ, Ann LB, Frausto RF, Nguyen CK, Yu F, Raber IM. Classification of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy as a corneal ectatic disorder following confirmation of associated significant corneal steepening. JAMA ophthalmology. 2013;131(12):1583–90. Epub 2013/10/12. pmid:24113819; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3888803.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Howell D, Damms T, Burchette JL, Green WR. Endothelial metaplasia in the iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(9):1896–901. pmid:9286281
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Liskova P, Palos M, Hardcastle AJ, Vincent AL. Further genetic and clinical insights of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 3. JAMA ophthalmology. 2013;131(10):1296–303. Epub 2013/06/29. pmid:23807282.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Liskova P, Tuft SJ, Gwilliam R, Ebenezer ND, Jirsova K, Prescott Q, et al. Novel mutations in the ZEB1 gene identified in Czech and British patients with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. Hum Mutat. 2007;28(6):638. Epub 2007/04/18. pmid:17437275; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2696796.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Aldave AJ, Yellore VS, Yu F, Bourla N, Sonmez B, Salem AK, et al. Posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy is associated with TCF8 gene mutations and abdominal hernia. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143(21):2549–56. pmid:17935237.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Krafchak CM, Pawar H, Moroi SE, Sugar A, Lichter PR, Mackey DA, et al. Mutations in TCF8 cause posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy and ectopic expression of COL4A3 by corneal endothelial cells. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77(5):694–708. Epub 2005/10/28. S0002-9297(07)63355-2 [pii] pmid:16252232; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1271382.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Aldave AJ, Han J, Frausto RF. Genetics of the corneal endothelial dystrophies: an evidence-based review. Clin Genet. 2013;84(2):109–19. Epub 2013/05/15. pmid:23662738; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3885339.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Biswas S, Munier FL, Yardley J, Hart-Holden N, Perveen R, Cousin P, et al. Missense mutations in COL8A2, the gene encoding the alpha2 chain of type VIII collagen, cause two forms of corneal endothelial dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(21):2415–23. pmid:11689488.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Liskova P, Gwilliam R, Filipec M, Jirsova K, Reinstein Merjava S, Deloukas P, et al. High prevalence of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in the Czech Republic; linkage disequilibrium mapping and dating an ancestral mutation. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45495. Epub 2012/10/11. pmid:23049806; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3458081.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Aldave AJ, Yellore VS, Vo RC, Kamal KM, Rayner SA, Plaisier CL, et al. Exclusion of positional candidate gene coding region mutations in the common posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1 candidate gene interval. Cornea. 2009;28(7):801–7. Epub 2009/07/04. pmid:19574904; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2714875.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Lai IN, Yellore VS, Rayner SA, D'Silva NC, Nguyen CK, Aldave AJ. The utility of next-generation sequencing in the evaluation of the posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1 locus. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2829–38. Epub 2011/01/05. pmid:21203404; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3012649.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Davidson AE, Liskova P, Evans CJ, Dudakova L, Noskova L, Pontikos N, et al. Autosomal-Dominant Corneal Endothelial Dystrophies CHED1 and PPCD1 Are Allelic Disorders Caused by Non-coding Mutations in the Promoter of OVOL2. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(1):75–89. pmid:26749309.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Shen AL, O'Leary KA, Dubielzig RR, Drinkwater N, Murphy CJ, Kasper CB, et al. The PPCD1 mouse: characterization of a mouse model for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy and identification of a candidate gene. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12213. Epub 2010/09/03. pmid:20808945; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2922377.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Hopfer U, Fukai N, Hopfer H, Wolf G, Joyce N, Li E, et al. Targeted disruption of Col8a1 and Col8a2 genes in mice leads to anterior segment abnormalities in the eye. Faseb J. 2005;19(10):1232–44. pmid:16051690.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Adiguzel E, Hou G, Mulholland D, Hopfer U, Fukai N, Olsen B, et al. Migration and growth are attenuated in vascular smooth muscle cells with type VIII collagen-null alleles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26(1):56–61. pmid:16269661.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Liu Y, Peng X, Tan J, Darling DS, Kaplan HJ, Dean DC. Zeb1 mutant mice as a model of posterior corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(5):1843–9. Epub 2008/04/26. 49/5/1843 [pii] pmid:18436818; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2504018.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Hickner PV, Debruyn B, Lovin DD, Mori A, Saski CA, Severson DW. Enhancing genome investigations in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus via BAC library construction and characterization. BMC research notes. 2011;4:358. Epub 2011/09/15. pmid:21914202; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3180476.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Luo M, Wing RA. An improved method for plant BAC library construction. Methods Mol Biol. 2003;236:3–20. Epub 2003/09/23. pmid:14501055.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18(5):821–9. Epub 2008/03/20. pmid:18349386; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2336801.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e11147. Epub 2010/07/02. pmid:20593022; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2892488.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, et al. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(15):e115. Epub 2012/06/26. pmid:22730293; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3424584.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Koressaar T, Remm M. Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(10):1289–91. Epub 2007/03/24. pmid:17379693.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Williams M, Rainville IR, Nicklas JA. Use of inverse PCR to amplify and sequence breakpoints of HPRT deletion and translocation mutations. environmental and molecular mutagenesis. 2002;39(1):22–32. pmid:11813293
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Brigid H. Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual: 2nd ed. Plainview, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1994.; 1994.

[ref32] 32. Skarnes WC, Rosen B, West AP, Koutsourakis M, Bushell W, Iyer V, et al. A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature. 2011;474(7351):337–42. Epub 2011/06/17. pmid:21677750; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3572410.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. White JK, Gerdin AK, Karp NA, Ryder E, Buljan M, Bussell JN, et al. Genome-wide generation and systematic phenotyping of knockout mice reveals new roles for many genes. Cell. 2013;154(2):452–64. Epub 2013/07/23. pmid:23870131; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3717207.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Guelman S, Kozuka K, Mao Y, Pham V, Solloway MJ, Wang J, et al. The Double-Histone-Acetyltransferase Complex ATAC Is Essential for Mammalian Development. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29(5):1176–88. pmid:19103755
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Henrichsen CN, Vinckenbosch N, Zollner S, Chaignat E, Pradervand S, Schutz F, et al. Segmental copy number variation shapes tissue transcriptomes. Nat Genet. 2009;41(4):424–9. Epub 2009/03/10. pmid:19270705.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Harewood L, Fraser P. The impact of chromosomal rearrangements on regulation of gene expression. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(R1):R76–82. Epub 2014/06/08. pmid:24907073.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Postigo AA. Opposing functions of ZEB proteins in the regulation of the TGFbeta/BMP signaling pathway. Embo J. 2003;22(10):2443–52. pmid:12743038.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Suganuma T, Mushegian A, Swanson SK, Abmayr SM, Florens L, Washburn MP, et al. The ATAC acetyltransferase complex coordinates MAP kinases to regulate JNK target genes. Cell. 2010;142(5):726–36. Epub 2010/09/04. pmid:20813260.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Krebs AR, Karmodiya K, Lindahl-Allen M, Struhl K, Tora L. SAGA and ATAC histone acetyl transferase complexes regulate distinct sets of genes and ATAC defines a class of p300-independent enhancers. Mol Cell. 2011;44(3):410–23. Epub 2011/11/08. pmid:22055187.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Peinado H, Olmeda D, Cano A. Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype? Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(6):415–28. pmid:17508028.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Wang Y-L, Faiola F, Xu M, Pan S, Martinez E. Human ATAC Is a GCN5/PCAF-containing Acetylase Complex with a Novel NC2-like Histone Fold Module That Interacts with the TATA-binding Protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283(49):33808–15. pmid:18838386
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Gheldof A, Hulpiau P, van Roy F, De Craene B, Berx G. Evolutionary functional analysis and molecular regulation of the ZEB transcription factors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(15):2527–41. Epub 2012/02/22. pmid:22349261.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Roca H, Hernandez J, Weidner S, McEachin RC, Fuller D, Sud S, et al. Transcription factors OVOL1 and OVOL2 induce the mesenchymal to epithelial transition in human cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76773. Epub 2013/10/15. pmid:24124593; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3790720.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] PubMed/NCBI

[165] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Animals

Statistical Analysis

Isolation and sequencing of BAC clones

Genotyping and PCR

Inverse PCR.

Copy number analysis

Gene expression

3’-RACE.

Histology

Results

Gene structure of the mouse Ppcd1 locus

Fusion transcripts produced by the PPCD1 Inversion

Expression of normal and fusion transcripts.

Csrp2bp and Dzank1 expression patterns

Ocular phenotypes associated with Csrp2bp and Dzank1 deficiency

PPCD1-associated embryonic lethality is due to disruption of Csrp2bp

Ovol2 gene expression

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. PCR of distal (3’) breakpoint.

S2 Fig. Alignment of PPCD1 sequence spanning the distal (3’) breakpoint with GRCm38.

S3 Fig. PCR of proximal (5’) breakpoint.

S4 Fig. PCR amplification of sequences spanning the proximal breakpoint.

S5 Fig. Alignment of PPCD1 sequence spanning the proximal (5’) breakpoint with Csrp2bp Intron 7 and GRCm38.

S6 Fig. Sequence of D2 Csrp2bp Intron 7.

S1 Table. Primers used in this study.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References