Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of an SV40-Transformed Human Fibroblast (MRC5CVI) and Its Untransformed Counterpart (MRC-5) in Response to UVB Irradiation

  • Cheng-Wei Chang,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan

  • Chaang-Ray Chen,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan

  • Chao-Ying Huang,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan

  • Wun-Yi Shu,

    Affiliation Institute of Statistics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan

  • Chi-Shiun Chiang,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan

  • Ji-Hong Hong,

    Affiliations Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

  • Ian C. Hsu

    ichsu@mx.nthu.edu.tw

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan

Abstract

Simian virus 40 (SV40) transforms cells through the suppression of tumor-suppressive responses by large T and small t antigens; studies on the effects of these two oncoproteins have greatly improved our knowledge of tumorigenesis. Large T antigen promotes cellular transformation by binding and inactivating p53 and pRb tumor suppressor proteins. Previous studies have shown that not all of the tumor-suppressive responses were inactivated in SV40-transformed cells; however, the underlying cause is not fully studied. In this study, we investigated the UVB-responsive transcriptome of an SV40-transformed fibroblast (MRC5CVI) and that of its untransformed counterpart (MRC-5). We found that, in response to UVB irradiation, MRC-5 and MRC5CVI commonly up-regulated the expression of oxidative phosphorylation genes. MRC-5 up-regulated the expressions of chromosome condensation, DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, and apoptotic genes, but MRC5CVI did not. Further cell death assays indicated that MRC5CVI was more sensitive than MRC-5 to UVB-induced cell death with increased caspase-3 activation; combining with the transcriptomic results suggested that MRC5CVI may undergo UVB-induced cell death through mechanisms other than transcriptional regulation. Our study provides a further understanding of the effects of SV40 transformation on cellular stress responses, and emphasizes the value of SV40-transformed cells in the researches of sensitizing neoplastic cells to radiations.

Introduction

Simian virus 40 (SV40) is a polyomavirus that productively infects its natural host, Rhesus macaque, and more importantly, has the ability to neoplastically transform several types of nonpermissive cells and induce tumors in newborn hamsters [1]. Previous studies have established that the expressions of two SV40-encoded oncoproteins, the large T antigen and the small t antigen, are important for transformation by SV40. The large T antigen exerts its transformational ability by binding to p53 and pRb of host cells, thereby inhibiting p53-dependent tumor-suppressive responses and abrogating pRb-dependent cell cycle arrest at G1/S transition [2][3]. Recent studies have also shown still other factors that interact with the large T antigen and may play transformation roles [2], [4][5]. The small t antigen inhibits the protein phosphastase PP2A family members to perturb the PI3K/Akt pathway and c-Myc [6][7], and enhances the expression of miR-27A to facilitate malignant transformation [8]. These studies have significantly improved our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis.

The tumor suppressor gene p53 plays a crucial role in response to stresses to maintain genome stability and prevent tumorigenesis, mainly through regulating the transcription of its target genes to initiate various tumor-suppressive responses such as cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, apoptosis, and senescence [9][12]. Recent studies have suggested that the regulation of energy metabolism is an additional tumor-suppressive function of p53 [13][15]. Under oncogenic stress, p53 directs cells to utilize mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation rather than aerobic glycolysis that favors oncogenic process [16][17]. We previously showed that UVB irradiation induces the transactivation of genes functioning in oxidative phosphorylation in an untransformed human lung fibroblast [18]; other studies have also shown oxidative phosphorylation to be a major radiation-responsive pathway [19][21]. Because the large T antigen impedes p53 in SV40-transformed cells, and p53 regulates oxidative phosphorylation, this tumor-suppressive response might be considered inactive in SV40-transformed cells.

Although the binding of large T antigen to p53 suggests the subsequent abrogation of p53-dependent responses, previous studies have shown that SV40-transformed cells still have certain p53 responses [22][23]. In SV40-transformed cells, CDKN1A expression (which encodes protein p21) was induced in concert with the nuclear accumulation of active p53 in response to DNA damage [22]. Loss of p53 function contributes to chemoresistance in certain tumor types [10]; however, previous studies have reported that SV40-transformed cells are sensitive to DNA damage stresses. For example, SV40-transformed cells showed reduced expression of transcriptional target of p53, but these cells exhibited increased apoptosis to ionizing radiation relative to their untransformed counterparts [23], and the expression of SV40 large T antigen increased apoptosis and reduced clonogenic cell survival to UVC irradiation [24]. However the underlying cause of these observations is not fully studied.

In this study, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of an SV40-transformed human fibroblast (MRC5CVI) after UVB irradiation, as well as that of its untransformed counterpart (MRC-5). We applied cell cycle analysis and cell death assays to validate our findings of the trascriptomic study. Our investigations showed that MRC5CVI failed to regulate the expression of chromosome condensation, DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, and apoptotic genes, but not oxidative phosphorylation genes in response to UVB irradiation. Further cell death assays indicated that MRC5CVI was more sensitive than MRC-5 to UVB-induced cell death with increased caspase-3 activation; combining with the transcriptomic results suggested that MRC5CVI may undergo UVB-induced cell death through mechanisms other than transcriptional regulation.

Results

Overview of Microarray Data Revealed Similar and Dissimilar Gene Expression Responses to UVB Irradiation between MRC-5 and MRC5CVI

We performed a loop-designed microarray experiment to examine the time series gene expressions of MRC5CVI after a 600 J/m2 UVB irradiation (detailed in Figure S1). We reanalyzed the microarray data of our previous study for comparison, which examined gene expressions of MRC-5 with the same dose of UVB irradiation and an identical microarray design [18]. The microarray experiments for both cell types were carried out by the same platform and with the same loop-design and data-processing procedures to minimize possible experimental and data-processing bias. We identified 489 and 739 UVB-regulated genes in MRC-5 and MRC5CVI respectively (Table 1). For each cell type, UVB-regulated genes were grouped by k-means clustering with k = 6 and 1,000 iterations. The k = 6 criterion was chosen based on the observation of six major clusters by applying hierarchical clustering methods. By hierarchical clustering methods, a few genes will occasionally be missed from the six major clusters during the functionally enrichment analysis. To have an overview of cellular responses according to all the significantly regulated genes, we chose k-means clustering with k = 6 to avoid missing any genes.

thumbnail
Table 1. Number of UVB-regulated genes in MRC-5 and MRC5CVI.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.t001

The gene groups were then examined by functional enrichment analysis. Significant functions of up-regulated gene groups common to MRC-5 and MRC5CVI are mainly related to two functional categories, translation and oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 1A, Groups 1 to 3 for MRC-5; Figure 1B, Group 1 for MRC5CVI). Examining the expression patterns of oxidative phosphorylation genes revealed excellent concordant regulation of these genes in MRC-5 and MRC5CVI (Figure S2). Significant functions of down-regulated gene groups common to both cell types includes transcription, regulation of transcription, cell cycle, and response to chemical stimulus (Figure 1A, Groups 5 and 6 for MRC-5; Figure 1B, Groups 3 and 4 for MRC5CVI). For the dissimilar part, MRC5CVI up-regulated the genes related to ligase activity (Figure 1B, Group 2) and down-regulated the genes related to chromosome organization, the MAPK signaling pathway, and the induction of apoptosis in response to UVB irradiation (Figure 1B, Group 3 to 5). The gene groups of MRC-5 did not significantly enrich these functions.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Clustering and functional enrichment analysis of UVB-regulated genes.

UVB irradiation altered the expression of 489 and 739 genes in untransformed human fibroblast MRC-5 and its SV40-transformed counterpart MRC5CVI, respectively (Table 1). Clustering the UVB-regulated genes by k-means resulted in (A) 3 up-regulated groups and 3 down-regulated groups for MRC-5; (B) 2 up-regulated groups and 4 down-regulated groups for MRC5CVI. The colored thick line in each group plot represents the mean expression of genes in the group, with yellow indicating up-regulation and blue indicating down-regulation. The x-axis represents the time points after UVB irradiation, and the y-axis represents the log2-transformed fold change of gene expression. Groups of genes were further examined with functional enrichment analysis with annotation of Gene Ontology and the KEGG pathway. Representatively enriched functions are listed next to group plots. Bold functions indicate functions common to MRC-5 and MRC5CVI, and italic functions indicate functions unique to MRC5CVI.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.g001

The Most Discrepant genes of MRC-5 and MRC5CVI Indicated their Regulatory Dissimilarities in Chromosome Condensation, DNA Repair, Cell Cycle Arrest, and Apoptosis

Combining 489 UVB-regulated genes in MRC-5 and 739 UVB-regulated genes in MRC5CVI resulted in 967 genes (Table 1). By filtering the expression patterns of the 967 genes between the two cell types with a criterion (Pearson correlation smaller than −0.519; detail in Materials and Methods - Identification of the most discrepant genes between the two cell types), 13 genes were identified as the most discrepant genes in response to UVB irradiation. The differential expression patterns of these 13 genes are shown in Figure 2. These 13 genes are related to chromosome condensation, DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis (Figure 3; related literatures are listed in Text S1). Previously we have validated our microarray system by RT-PCR with randomly selected genes, and the results were generally good (with R2 ranged from 0.86 to 0.94) [18], [25][26]. To verify the significant gene expression patterns in this study, we further performed RT-PCR analysis for certain UVB-regulated genes, including the transcriptional targets of p53 (GADD45A and CDKN1A), one antioxidant gene (GPX1), and three of the most discrepant genes (MEN1, NCAPH, and IL8). The RT-PCR results validated the microarray data of both cell types (R2 = 0.82 for MRC-5 and R2 = 0.88 for MRC5CVI; see Figure S3).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Expression patterns of the most discrepant genes between MRC-5 and MRC5CVI.

These 13 genes were identified as the most discrepant genes between two cell types in response to UVB irradiation. The title in each subplot indicates the Entrez gene ID and gene name; clones cannot be matched to any Entrez gene ID labeled with their clone ID. The green line with the open circle indicates the gene expression pattern of MRC-5, whereas the blue line with the open diamond indicates that of MRC5CVI. The x-axis represents the time points after UVB irradiation, and the y-axis represents the log2-transformed fold change of gene expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. A literature-based model of the most discrepant genes.

A literature search shows that the most discrepant genes are related to chromosome condensation, DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis (these studies are listed in Text S1). The p53/CDKN1A/pRb pathway and BAX are included to help clarify the results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.g003

UVB Induced G2/M Arrest in MRC-5, but Neither G1/S nor G2/M Arrest in MRC5CVI

The protein encoded by the gene NCAPH plays a role in chromosome condensation [27][28], and is important in regulating mitotic cell death [29]. Both NCAPH and GADD45A are important in regulating DNA repair [30][32], thus their discrepant expressions suggest the difference in repair capability between the two cell types (Figure 3). GADD45A also plays a crucial role in regulating G2/M arrest [32][34]. The RT-PCR results validated the discrepant regulation of GADD45A between the two cell types, as well as the consistent down-regulation of CDKN1A in both cell types (Figure S4). In addition to the regulation by p53, the expression of MEN1 [35][36] and TSPYL5 [37][38] may play superior roles in regulating GADD45A and CDKN1A expressions in MRC5CVI. The discrepant regulation of GADD45A between MRC-5 and MRC5CV1 suggests their differences in regulating G2/M arrest in response to UVB irradiation. We then performed cell cycle analysis and found the increments of G2/M population for MRC-5 (Figure 4A), whereas only a gradual decrease of G2/M cells for MRC5CVI after UVB irradiation (Figure 4B). The consistent down-regulation of CDKN1A implies that both cell types may not regulate G1/S arrest. The cell cycle result confirmed that G1/S arrest was abrogated in both cell types in response to UVB irradiation.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Cell cycle analysis of MRC-5 and MRC5CVI.

Panel (A), results of MRC-5; panel (B), results of MRC5CVI. Pairwise statistical comparisons of the corresponding cell cycle phase between the time point and control were performed using Student’s t test (*, P<0.05; **, P<0.01). Error bars show the standard deviation (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.g004

MRC5CVI was more Sensitive to UVB-induced Cell Death than MRC-5

Among the most discrepant genes between MRC-5 and MRC5CVI, five are functionally involved in apoptotic regulation (Figure 3). According to their roles in regulating apoptosis, their expressions favor a UVB-induced apoptotic response in MRC-5 cells, whereas only the significant down-regulation of SPHK1 favors the pro-apoptotic status of MRC5CVI in response to UVB irradiation (detailed in the Discussion section). To examine the cell death response of both cell types after UVB irradiation, we performed two assays, as follows: estimating the percentage of cell detachment and active caspase-3 staining. Percent detachment was calculated as the number of cells in the medium compared to the total cells. Previous studies have used percent detachment as a quantitative estimate of cell death in fibroblasts [24], [39], and the activation of caspase-3 represents a major feature of apoptosis [40]. The results of cell death assays indicated that both cell types underwent cell death with activated caspase-3 after UVB irradiation, with MRC5CVI being more sensitive than MRC-5 (Figure 5A and 5B).

thumbnail
Figure 5. Examination of cell death after UVB irradiation by percent detachment and active caspase-3 staining.

Panel (A), results of percent detachment; panel (B), results of active caspase-3 staining. Pairwise statistical comparisons between the time point of two cell types were performed using Student’s t test (*, P<0.05). Error bars show the standard deviation (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.g005

Discussion

We investigated the UVB-responsive transcriptome of MRC5CVI and MRC-5. Based on the results of functional enrichment analysis, the literature review, cell cycle analysis, and cell death analysis, we summarized their responses to UVB irradiation into similar and dissimilar regulated functions (Figure 6A and 6B, respectively). In response to UVB irradiation, MRC5CVI was still able to up-regulate the expression of oxidative phosphorylation genes as MRC-5 was (Figure 6A and Figure S2). Furthermore, MRC5CVI failed to regulate the expression of chromosome condensation, DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, and apoptotic genes in human fibroblasts (Figure 6B). Our results of the cell death assays revealed that MRC5CVI was more sensitive to UVB-induced cell death than MRC-5, which is in agreement with the results of previous studies, which showed that SV40-transformed cells are more sensitive to radiation than their untransformed counterparts (see the following discussion) [23][24].

thumbnail
Figure 6. Summary of similar and dissimilar responses to UVB irradiation of MRC-5 and MRC5CVI.

The UVB-induced responses are represented by functions that are (A) similarly or (B) dissimilarly regulated in MRC-5 and MRC5CVI. For example, the regulation of oxidative phosphorylation is similar, whereas the regulation of cell cycle arrest is dissimilar in the two cell types. The transcriptomic results suggest that the apoptosis response is suppressed in MRC5CVI; however, the results of the cell death assays indicate that MRC5CVI is more sensitive to UVB-induced cell death (see the Discussion section).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.g006

As discussed in our previous study, after UVB irradiation, the up-regulation of genes related to translation and ribosomal proteins in human fibroblasts suggested the need to renew UVB-damaged ribosomal proteins [18]. This corresponds to the result by the Casati and Walbot study, which showed that UVB irradiation induced direct ribosomal damage by crosslinking ribosomal proteins to RNA [41]. Furthermore, UV irradiation inflicted UV photoproducts on DNA, which impedes RNA polymerase and suppresses global transcription [42]. Our microarray data indicated that gene expression related to transcription was also down-regulated in both cell types (Figure 1), which may suggest a feedback control that retards the transcriptional process for DNA repair. The suppression of cell cycle genes implies the slowdown of cell cycle progression because of UVB-induced cellular damage. In addition, the genes of functions related to the actin cytoskeleton, development, protein targeting/localization, and response to chemical stimulus were down-regulated in both cell types (Figure 1). Gene regulation concerning translation, transcription, cell cycle, and the functions common to MRC-5 and MRC5CVI represents general cellular responses to UVB irradiation.

The up-regulation of oxidative phosphorylation is a major radiation-responsive pathway [19][21], which implies the need for energy to sustain cellular damage responses [18]. The up-regulation of oxidative phosphorylation was recently proposed to be a tumor-suppressive response under the control of p53 to reduce the generation of reactive oxygen species in response to stress [13][15]. However, our microarray data showed that genes related to oxidative phosphorylation were up-regulated in MRC5CVI as they were in MRC-5 (Figure S2), which suggests that the regulation of this response is intact in MRC5CVI. Thus, the regulation of oxidative phosphorylation may either be p53-independent in response to UVB irradiation or p53-dependent if large T antigen-bound p53 is still able to exert this regulation, but may play a minor role in the SV40 transformation process.

Persistent DNA lesions caused by UV irradiation activate p53 and the subsequent tumor-suppressive responses, including DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis [43][46]. We showed that among three of the p53 transcriptional targets (GADD45A, CDKN1A, and BAX), only GADD45A was up-regulated in MRC-5 in response to UVB irradiation (Figure S4; BAX is not in the probe sets of our microarray platform). The suppressed expressions of CDKN1A and BAX can be perceived with the results of previous studies that longer genes suffered more UV photoproducts that inflicted transcriptional blockage [24], [47]. The length of GADD45A is relatively shorter (3.2 kb) than that of CDKN1A (10.8 kb) and BAX (6.9 kb). Thus in MRC-5, GADD45A expression persists as a secondary defense to activate G2/M arrest and the DNA repair process when the first defense genes, such as CDKN1A and BAX, fail to be expressed after UVB irradiation. In MRC5CVI, the down-regulation of GADD45A after UVB irradiation is consistent with the impediment of the p53 function by large T antigen, and is related to the reduced DNA repair capacity and impaired G2/M arrest in SV40-transformed cells [48][50]. The concurrent down-regulation of chromosome condensation, DNA repair, and cell cycle arrest genes may cause genomic instability and lead to mitotic cell death for MRC5CVI. Therefore, the gradual decrease of G2/M cells after UVB irradiation for MRC5CVI (Figure 4B) may be the result of genome-unstable-caused cell death during the G2/M phase.

Sensitizing tumor cells to radiation is a crucial issue for radiobiologists [51][53]. The SV40-transformed cells may represent a sensitized neoplastic model, which enable us to investigate factors and mechanisms for sensitizing tumor cells. For example, previous studies have shown that the introduction of the SV40 T/t common polypeptide increased the sensitivity of HER2-overexpressing cancer cells to chemotherapy drugs, and these reports have suggested that this is attributed to the inhibition of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and ERK by the polypeptide [54][56]. Our results of the cell death assays showed that MRC5CVI was more sensitive to UVB-induced cell death than MRC-5 (Figure 5), despite the functional enrichment analysis of microarray data having indicated that genes related to the induction of apoptosis were down-regulated in MRC5CVI in response to UVB irradiation (Figure 1). In addition, the regulation of the most discrepant genes did not favor the apoptotic status of MRC5CVI (Figure 3). The protein product of the AREG sequesters the BAX protein in the cytoplasm to suppress the apoptotic process [57]. The BCL2L2 of the Bcl-2 family is an important anti-apoptotic gene [58], and suppression of its expression sensitizes cells to anticancer drugs [59][60], whereas MT1F exerts its tumor-suppressive ability by inducing apoptosis [61]. Thus, the down-regulation of AREG, the early suppression of BCL2L2, and the up-regulation of MT1F expressions imply an early onset of apoptosis for MRC-5 in response to UVB irradiation, whereas all of these gene expressions do not suggest an apoptotic response in MRC5CVI (Figure 3). In addition, pro-apoptotic genes transactivated by p53 were either down-regulated (BAX) or not significantly regulated (APAF1, BID, BAK1, and PMAIP1) in MRC5CVI (Figure S4 and S5). Only the significant down-regulation of SPHK1, which is an anti-apoptotic gene that protects cells to UVB irradiation [62][63], may confer a pro-apoptotic phenotype to MRC5CVI in response to UVB irradiation. Thus, an overview of transcriptomic results suggests that the increased UVB-induced cell death of MRC5CVI is transcription-independent of the regulation of apoptotic genes. MRC5CVI may undergo cell death through mechanisms other than those in MRC-5. Several mechanisms might account for this possibility: (a) The large T antigen-bound p53 protein may still be able to induce cell death through a transcription-independent pathway. This hypothesis is supported by recent studies showing that physical interactions of p53 with various members of the Bcl-2 family provide a transcription-independent process of p53-mediated cell death (see reviews of [64][65]). (b) Down-regulation of chromosome condensation and the DNA repair genes after UVB irradiation in coordination with the lost control of cell cycle arrest may push MRC5CVI into a genome-unstable and pro-apoptotic status, which leads to mitotic cell death. The factor that initiates cell death progression under this status requires further exploration if it is not p53. (c) Down-regulation of SPHK1 may be sufficient to sensitize MRC5CVI to UVB-induced cell death. If this is true, how SV40 transformation alters the expression of SPHK1 is worth exploring, as well as whether this alternation applies to sensitivities in response to other genotoxic stresses. All of these hypotheses await further investigation, and the corresponding results may provide insights into the sensitization of neoplastic cells to radiation.

Our results may provide insights into the effects of SV40 transformation, and benefit further researches on those transformation-affected tumor-suppressive responses. We hope that this study could lead to more comprehensive investigations of the stress response of multiple independently derived SV40-transformed cell lines.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture and UVB Irradiation

Normal human fibroblasts MRC-5 (CCL-171, purchased from American Type Culture Collection, Manassas; and BCRC-60023, purchased from Bioresource Collection and Research Center, Taiwan) were grown as previously described [18]. SV40-transformed human lung fibroblast MRC5CVI was a kind gift from Dr. C. Arlett (MRC Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, UK; formerly the MRC Cell Mutation Unit) to Dr. J.H. Hong with related publications [66][67]. MRC5CVI were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT), 100 U/ml penicillin, 10 µg/ml streptomycin with 0.29 mg/ml glutamine (Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY) at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO2. The UVB-light source was a 6-W UVB fluorescent tube (model Spectroline EB-160C, Spectronics Corporation, Westbury, NY) and was set up as described previously [18]. The UVB dose was measured by a photometer (model IL 1400A, International Light Inc., Newburyport, MA). Cells were seeded in 10 cm cell culture dishes and let grow to 40% confluence. Before UVB irradiation, the growth medium for each dish was collected in a centrifuge tube; cells were washed twice with PBS and then irradiated with 600 J/m2 UVB in an uncovered dish with a thin layer of PBS. An accompanied control dish of cells was treated identically for each time point, except for UVB radiation. After UVB irradiation, cells were replenished with the previously collected growth medium and incubated for 4, 8, 16, or 24 h before harvest. The culture and the UVB irradiation procedure for both cell types were carried out simultaneously with the same incubator and UVB-irradiating system to minimize possible technical bias.

Microarray Analysis

Microarray fabrication, hybridization, and data preprocessing were performed as previously described [18]. Cells were harvested with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to extract total RNA according to manufacturer protocols at scheduled time points. The total RNA was further purified by RNeasy (Quiagen, Valencia, CA). The quality of total RNA was assessed using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer with the RNA 6000 Nano LabChip kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). Reverse transcription and microarray hybridization were conducted using SuperScript II (Invitrogen) and the 3DNA Array 50™ kit (Genisphere, Hatfield, PA) following manufacturer protocols. A total of 8 RNA samples (control and UVB irradiated samples at 4, 8, 16, or 24 h after treatment) were hybridized with 10 microarrays in a loop-design as previously described (Figure S1) [18]. Microarray data preprocessing, normalization, and statistical analysis were performed by a bioinformatics software suit: Tsing Hua Engine for Microarray Experiment (THEME [68]. Pin-wise lowess-normalized microarray data were further processed by using a log linear model as described previously [18], [68]. Differentially expressed cDNA clones for each time point were identified by applying criteria of the Bonferroni-adjusted F test P-value <0.05 and a fold change of at least 1.5. The microarray data of MRC5CVI was submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, Series accession number GSE41319), and the microarray data of MRC-5 from our previous study was reanalyzed for comparison (Series accession number GSE7589) [18].

Identification of the Most Discrepant genes between the two Cell Types

We identified 489 and 739 UVB-regulated genes in MRC-5 and MRC5CVI respectively (Table 1). Combining these genes resulted in 967 genes as the candidates for selecting the most discrepant genes between the two cell types in response to UVB irradiation. We first calculated the Pearson correlation of the expression patterns of each of the 967 genes between the two cell types. We then estimated the random correlation by randomly matching all of the genes in MRC-5 to the genes in MRC5CVI and calculated the random match correlations. After 100 iterations, the results converged toward a distribution of random correlation with a mean close to zero and a standard deviation of 0.519. Most of the Pearson correlations of the 967 genes are greater than 0.519 (583 out of 967 genes). By selecting genes with a Pearson correlation smaller than −0.519, 13 genes are identified as the most discrepant genes between the two cell types in response to UVB irradiation.

Functional Annotation and Functional Enrichment Analysis

Functional annotation and functional enrichment analysis was accessed through DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery) [69][70], which performed a modified Fisher’s exact test (with EASE score as the P-value) to select over-represented functions. The Entrez gene ID was used as the gene-specific identifier for bioinformatics analysis. KEGG pathways or GO terms containing more than 5 genes and with an EASE score smaller than 0.05 were considered significant.

Cell-cycle Analysis and Cell Death Assays

For cell-cycle analysis, 5×105 cells were seeded in 10 cm cell culture dishes and allowed to grow for 24 h. At 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 h after UVB irradiation, attached cells were trypsinized and collected with the cells in growth medium, washed in iced PBS, and then fixed with ethanol at −20°C overnight. Before analysis, cells were washed twice in iced PBS and stained with a 2 ml propidium iodide staining solution (20 µg/ml of propidium iodide, 200 µg/ml of RNase A, and 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS) at 37°C for 30 min. Cell cycle analysis was performed by FACScan (BD Biosciences), and the result was analyzed with Modfit LT 3.2 software (Verity Software House, Inc.). For active caspase-3 staining, cells were UVB irradiated, collected, and fixed with ethanol at −20°C overnight. After fixation, cells were washed twice in iced PBS, and then followed the instruction of the FITC Active Caspase-3 Apoptosis Kit (BD Biosciences, cat#550480). The results were analyzed with WinMDI 2.8 software (Scripps, La Jolla, CA). For cell detachment analysis, at 24 and 48 h after UVB irradiation, detached cells were collected from the growth medium by centrifugation, whereas attached cells were washed with PBS, trypsinized, and collected by centrifugation separately. Cells were resuspended in 1 ml cold PBS and the cell numbers of detached and attached cells were determined by hemocytometer counting. The percent detachment was calculated as the number of detached cells over the total number of detached and attached cells.

Real-Time PCR Assay

Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assay was performed using Power SYBR Green Master Mix and ABI Prism 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Gene specific primers were designed using the Primer-BLAST [71]; only primers without non-specific targets were used. All primers used in this study are provided in Table S1. Assays in triplicate were conducted using the following conditions: 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 95°C and then 40 cycles of amplification (95 °C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s). The quantity of target mRNAs was normalized to that of a reference gene, PPIA.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Flowchart of the design of UVB exposure and loop-designed microarray. 4UV, 8UV, 16UV and 24UV denote samples that were harvested at 4, 8, 16 and 24 h after 600 J/m2 of UVB irradiation respectively. 4C, 8C, 16C and 24C denote the accompanied control samples. Each arrow indicates a microarray hybridization experiment. The arrowheads represent samples that were labeled with Cy5, and the tails represent samples that were labeled with Cy3. The microarray data of MRC5CVI was submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, Series accession number GSE41319), and the microarray data of MRC-5 from our previous study was reanalyzed for comparison (Series accession number GSE7589).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.s001

(PDF)

Figure S2.

The expression patterns of genes related to oxidative phosphorylation. The title in each subplot indicates the Entrez gene ID and gene name. The green line with the open circle indicates the gene expression pattern of MRC-5, whereas the blue line with the open diamond indicates that of MRC5CVI. The x-axis represents the time points after UVB irradiation, and the y-axis represents the log2-transformed fold change of gene expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.s002

(PDF)

Figure S3.

Validation of microarray data by RT-PCR. RT-PCR was performed to verify the microarray data across all time points. The genes selected were GADD45A, CDKN1A, GPX1, and IL8 for MRC-5; GADD45A, CDKN1A, GPX1, MEN1, and NCAPH for MRC5CVI. The expression levels of a reference gene, PPIA, were used to normalize that of target genes. RT-PCR analysis of these genes verified the microarray data, with (A) R2 = 0.82 for MRC-5 and (B) R2 = 0.88 for MRC5CVI. The x-axis represents the log2-transformed fold change of gene expression of microarray data, and the y-axis represents that of RT-PCR data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.s003

(PDF)

Figure S4.

Results of RT-PCR for three transcriptional targets of p53. By applying RT-PCR, we examined the expressions of 3 genes (GADD45A, CDKN1A, and BAX; BAX is not in the probe sets of our microarray platform), which are transcriptionally regulated by p53. The title in each subplot indicates the Entrez gene ID and gene name. The green line with the open circle indicates the gene expression pattern of MRC-5, whereas the blue line with the open diamond indicates that of MRC5CVI. The solid line indicates the result of microarray, whereas the dashed line indicates the result of RT-PCR. The x-axis represents the time points after UVB irradiation, and the y-axis represents the log2-transformed fold change of gene expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.s004

(PDF)

Figure S5.

The expression patterns of TP53 and the genes related to regulation of apoptosis. The title in each subplot indicates the Entrez gene ID and gene name. The green line with the open circle indicates the gene expression pattern of MRC-5, whereas the blue line with the open diamond indicates that of MRC5CVI. The x-axis represents the time points after UVB irradiation, and the y-axis represents the log2-transformed fold change of gene expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.s005

(PDF)

Text S1.

Literature review of the most discrepant genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073311.s007

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. D.C. Chang (National Chun Cheng University, Taiwan) for inspirational discussion. We thank Wallace Academic Editing Ltd. for providing scientific editing service.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CWC CYH. Performed the experiments: CWC CYH. Analyzed the data: CWC CRC WYS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ICH CSC WYS JHH. Wrote the paper: CWC ICH CRC CSC.

References

  1. 1. Pipas JM (2009) SV40: Cell transformation and tumorigenesis. Virology 384: 294–303.
  2. 2. Ahuja D, Saenz-Robles MT, Pipas JM (2005) SV40 large T antigen targets multiple cellular pathways to elicit cellular transformation. Oncogene 24: 7729–7745.
  3. 3. DeCaprio JA (2009) How the Rb tumor suppressor structure and function was revealed by the study of Adenovirus and SV40. Virology 384: 274–284.
  4. 4. Cantalupo PG, Saenz-Robles MT, Rathi AV, Beerman RW, Patterson WH, et al. (2009) Cell-type specific regulation of gene expression by simian virus 40 T antigens. Virology 386: 183–191.
  5. 5. Hein J, Boichuk S, Wu J, Cheng Y, Freire R, et al. (2009) Simian virus 40 large T antigen disrupts genome integrity and activates a DNA damage response via Bub1 binding. J Virol 83: 117–127.
  6. 6. Arroyo JD, Hahn WC (2005) Involvement of PP2A in viral and cellular transformation. Oncogene 24: 7746–7755.
  7. 7. Sablina AA, Hahn WC (2008) SV40 small T antigen and PP2A phosphatase in cell transformation. Cancer Metastasis Rev 27: 137–146.
  8. 8. Wang Q, Li DC, Li ZF, Liu CX, Xiao YM, et al.. (2011) Upregulation of miR-27a contributes to the malignant transformation of human bronchial epithelial cells induced by SV40 small T antigen. Oncogene.
  9. 9. Smith ML, Seo YR (2002) p53 regulation of DNA excision repair pathways. Mutagenesis 17: 149–156.
  10. 10. Fridman JS, Lowe SW (2003) Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene 22: 9030–9040.
  11. 11. Vazquez A, Bond EE, Levine AJ, Bond GL (2008) The genetics of the p53 pathway, apoptosis and cancer therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7: 979–987.
  12. 12. Vousden KH, Prives C (2009) Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53. Cell 137: 413–431.
  13. 13. Bensaad K, Tsuruta A, Selak MA, Vidal MN, Nakano K, et al. (2006) TIGAR, a p53-inducible regulator of glycolysis and apoptosis. Cell 126: 107–120.
  14. 14. Matoba S, Kang JG, Patino WD, Wragg A, Boehm M, et al. (2006) p53 regulates mitochondrial respiration. Science 312: 1650–1653.
  15. 15. Hu W, Zhang C, Wu R, Sun Y, Levine A, et al. (2010) Glutaminase 2, a novel p53 target gene regulating energy metabolism and antioxidant function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 7455–7460.
  16. 16. Vousden KH, Ryan KM (2009) p53 and metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 691–700.
  17. 17. Feng Z, Levine AJ (2010) The regulation of energy metabolism and the IGF-1/mTOR pathways by the p53 protein. Trends Cell Biol 20: 427–434.
  18. 18. Tsai ML, Chang KY, Chiang CS, Shu WY, Weng TC, et al. (2009) UVB radiation induces persistent activation of ribosome and oxidative phosphorylation pathways. Radiat Res 171: 716–724.
  19. 19. Sriharshan A, Boldt K, Sarioglu H, Barjaktarovic Z, Azimzadeh O, et al. (2012) Proteomic analysis by SILAC and 2D-DIGE reveals radiation-induced endothelial response: four key pathways. J Proteomics 75: 2319–2330.
  20. 20. Azimzadeh O, Scherthan H, Sarioglu H, Barjaktarovic Z, Conrad M, et al. (2011) Rapid proteomic remodeling of cardiac tissue caused by total body ionizing radiation. Proteomics 11: 3299–3311.
  21. 21. Barjaktarovic Z, Schmaltz D, Shyla A, Azimzadeh O, Schulz S, et al. (2011) Radiation-induced signaling results in mitochondrial impairment in mouse heart at 4 weeks after exposure to X-rays. PLoS One 6: e27811.
  22. 22. Hess RD, Brandner G (1997) DNA-damage-inducible p53 activity in SV40-transformed cells. Oncogene 15: 2501–2504.
  23. 23. Kohli M, Jorgensen TJ (1999) The influence of SV40 immortalization of human fibroblasts on p53-dependent radiation responses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 257: 168–176.
  24. 24. McKay BC, Ljungman M, Rainbow AJ (1998) Persistent DNA damage induced by ultraviolet light inhibits p21waf1 and bax expression: implications for DNA repair, UV sensitivity and the induction of apoptosis. Oncogene 17: 545–555.
  25. 25. Huang CL, Shu WY, Tsai ML, Chiang CS, Chang CW, et al. (2011) Repeated small perturbation approach reveals transcriptomic steady states. PLoS One 6: e29241.
  26. 26. Li CY, Chiang CS, Cheng WC, Wang SC, Cheng HT, et al. (2012) Gene expression profiling of dendritic cells in different physiological stages under Cordyceps sinensis treatment. PLoS One 7: e40824.
  27. 27. Ono T, Losada A, Hirano M, Myers MP, Neuwald AF, et al. (2003) Differential contributions of condensin I and condensin II to mitotic chromosome architecture in vertebrate cells. Cell 115: 109–121.
  28. 28. Tada K, Susumu H, Sakuno T, Watanabe Y (2011) Condensin association with histone H2A shapes mitotic chromosomes. Nature 474: 477–483.
  29. 29. Lai SK, Wong CH, Lee YP, Li HY (2011) Caspase-3-mediated degradation of condensin Cap-H regulates mitotic cell death. Cell Death Differ 18: 996–1004.
  30. 30. Heale JT, Ball AR Jr, Schmiesing JA, Kim JS, Kong X, et al. (2006) Condensin I interacts with the PARP-1-XRCC1 complex and functions in DNA single-strand break repair. Mol Cell 21: 837–848.
  31. 31. Smith ML, Ford JM, Hollander MC, Bortnick RA, Amundson SA, et al. (2000) p53-mediated DNA repair responses to UV radiation: studies of mouse cells lacking p53, p21, and/or gadd45 genes. Mol Cell Biol 20: 3705–3714.
  32. 32. Maeda T, Hanna AN, Sim AB, Chua PP, Chong MT, et al. (2002) GADD45 regulates G2/M arrest, DNA repair, and cell death in keratinocytes following ultraviolet exposure. J Invest Dermatol 119: 22–26.
  33. 33. Hollander MC, Sheikh MS, Bulavin DV, Lundgren K, Augeri-Henmueller L, et al. (1999) Genomic instability in Gadd45a-deficient mice. Nat Genet 23: 176–184.
  34. 34. Jin S, Tong T, Fan W, Fan F, Antinore MJ, et al. (2002) GADD45-induced cell cycle G2-M arrest associates with altered subcellular distribution of cyclin B1 and is independent of p38 kinase activity. Oncogene 21: 8696–8704.
  35. 35. Francis J, Lin W, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Meyerson M (2011) The menin tumor suppressor protein is phosphorylated in response to DNA damage. PLoS One 6: e16119.
  36. 36. Kottemann MC, Bale AE (2009) Characterization of DNA damage-dependent cell cycle checkpoints in a menin-deficient model. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 944–952.
  37. 37. Epping MT, Meijer LA, Krijgsman O, Bos JL, Pandolfi PP, et al. (2011) TSPYL5 suppresses p53 levels and function by physical interaction with USP7. Nat Cell Biol 13: 102–108.
  38. 38. Kim EJ, Lee SY, Kim TR, Choi SI, Cho EW, et al. (2010) TSPYL5 is involved in cell growth and the resistance to radiation in A549 cells via the regulation of p21(WAF1/Cip1) and PTEN/AKT pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 392: 448–453.
  39. 39. de Feraudy S, Revet I, Bezrookove V, Feeney L, Cleaver JE (2010) A minority of foci or pan-nuclear apoptotic staining of gammaH2AX in the S phase after UV damage contain DNA double-strand breaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 6870–6875.
  40. 40. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Abrams JM, Alnemri ES, Baehrecke EH, et al. (2012) Molecular definitions of cell death subroutines: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2012. Cell Death Differ 19: 107–120.
  41. 41. Casati P, Walbot V (2004) Crosslinking of ribosomal proteins to RNA in maize ribosomes by UV-B and its effects on translation. Plant Physiol 136: 3319–3332.
  42. 42. Tornaletti S, Hanawalt PC (1999) Effect of DNA lesions on transcription elongation. Biochimie 81: 139–146.
  43. 43. Brash DE, Ziegler A, Jonason AS, Simon JA, Kunala S, et al. (1996) Sunlight and sunburn in human skin cancer: p53, apoptosis, and tumor promotion. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 1: 136–142.
  44. 44. Ford JM, Hanawalt PC (1997) Expression of wild-type p53 is required for efficient global genomic nucleotide excision repair in UV-irradiated human fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 272: 28073–28080.
  45. 45. Maeda T, Sim AB, Leedel DA, Chua PP, Chomey EG, et al. (2003) UV induces GADD45 in a p53-dependent and -independent manner in human keratinocytes. J Cutan Med Surg 7: 119–123.
  46. 46. Latonen L, Laiho M (2005) Cellular UV damage responses–functions of tumor suppressor p53. Biochim Biophys Acta 1755: 71–89.
  47. 47. McKay BC, Stubbert LJ, Fowler CC, Smith JM, Cardamore RA, et al. (2004) Regulation of ultraviolet light-induced gene expression by gene size. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 6582–6586.
  48. 48. McKay BC, Winrow C, Rainbow AJ (1997) Capacity of UV-irradiated human fibroblasts to support adenovirus DNA synthesis correlates with transcription-coupled repair and is reduced in SV40-transformed cells and cells expressing mutant p53. Photochem Photobiol 66: 659–664.
  49. 49. Chang TH, Ray FA, Thompson DA, Schlegel R (1997) Disregulation of mitotic checkpoints and regulatory proteins following acute expression of SV40 large T antigen in diploid human cells. Oncogene 14: 2383–2393.
  50. 50. Taylor WR, Stark GR (2001) Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53. Oncogene 20: 1803–1815.
  51. 51. Gerweck LE, Vijayappa S, Kurimasa A, Ogawa K, Chen DJ (2006) Tumor cell radiosensitivity is a major determinant of tumor response to radiation. Cancer Res 66: 8352–8355.
  52. 52. Eschrich SA, Pramana J, Zhang H, Zhao H, Boulware D, et al. (2009) A gene expression model of intrinsic tumor radiosensitivity: prediction of response and prognosis after chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75: 489–496.
  53. 53. Kim HS, Kim SC, Kim SJ, Park CH, Jeung HC, et al. (2012) Identification of a radiosensitivity signature using integrative metaanalysis of published microarray data for NCI-60 cancer cells. BMC Genomics 13: 348.
  54. 54. Lin YC, Peng JM, Wang WB (2000) The N-terminal common domain of simian virus 40 large T and small t antigens acts as a transformation suppressor of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Oncogene 19: 2704–2713.
  55. 55. Wen CC, Cheng SA, Hsuen SP, Huang YL, Kuo ZK, et al. (2006) SV40 T/t-common polypeptide specifically induces apoptosis in human cancer cells that overexpress HER2/neu. Cancer Res 66: 5847–5857.
  56. 56. Hsueh SP, Du JL, Hsu WB, Fang CA, Liu H, et al. (2012) SV40 T/t-common polypeptide enhances the sensitivity of HER2-overexpressing human cancer cells to anticancer drugs cisplatin and doxorubicin. Cancer Lett 324: 48–57.
  57. 57. Busser B, Sancey L, Josserand V, Niang C, Favrot MC, et al. (2010) Amphiregulin promotes BAX inhibition and resistance to gefitinib in non-small-cell lung cancers. Mol Ther 18: 528–535.
  58. 58. Uittenbogaard M, Baxter KK, Chiaramello A (2009) Cloning and characterization of the 5′UTR of the rat anti-apoptotic Bcl-w gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 389: 657–662.
  59. 59. Crawford M, Batte K, Yu L, Wu X, Nuovo GJ, et al. (2009) MicroRNA 133B targets pro-survival molecules MCL-1 and BCL2L2 in lung cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 388: 483–489.
  60. 60. Yang X, Yin J, Yu J, Xiang Q, Liu Y, et al. (2012) miRNA-195 sensitizes human hepatocellular carcinoma cells to 5-FU by targeting BCL-w. Oncol Rep 27: 250–257.
  61. 61. Yan DW, Fan JW, Yu ZH, Li MX, Wen YG, et al. (2012) Downregulation of Metallothionein 1F, a putative oncosuppressor, by loss of heterozygosity in colon cancer tissue. Biochim Biophys Acta 1822: 918–926.
  62. 62. Uchida Y, Houben E, Park K, Douangpanya S, Lee YM, et al. (2010) Hydrolytic pathway protects against ceramide-induced apoptosis in keratinocytes exposed to UVB. J Invest Dermatol 130: 2472–2480.
  63. 63. Song L, Xiong H, Li J, Liao W, Wang L, et al. (2011) Sphingosine kinase-1 enhances resistance to apoptosis through activation of PI3K/Akt/NF-kappaB pathway in human non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17: 1839–1849.
  64. 64. Speidel D (2010) Transcription-independent p53 apoptosis: an alternative route to death. Trends Cell Biol 20: 14–24.
  65. 65. Moll UM, Wolff S, Speidel D, Deppert W (2005) Transcription-independent pro-apoptotic functions of p53. Curr Opin Cell Biol 17: 631–636.
  66. 66. Smith PJ, Nakeff A, Watson JV (1985) Flow-cytometric detection of changes in the fluorescence emission spectrum of a vital DNA-specific dye in human tumour cells. Exp Cell Res 159: 37–46.
  67. 67. Hong JH, Gatti RA, Huo YK, Chiang CS, McBride WH (1994) G2/M-phase arrest and release in ataxia telangiectasia and normal cells after exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 140: 17–23.
  68. 68. Chen CR, Shu WY, Tsai ML, Cheng WC, Hsu IC (2012) THEME: a web tool for loop-design microarray data analysis. Comput Biol Med 42: 228–234.
  69. 69. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 1–13.
  70. 70. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44–57.
  71. 71. Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, et al. (2012) Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics 13: 134.