Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Infectious Prions in Pre-Clinical Deer and Transmission of Chronic Wasting Disease Solely by Environmental Exposure

  • Candace K. Mathiason,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America

  • Sheila A. Hays,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America

  • Jenny Powers,

    Affiliation National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America

  • Jeanette Hayes-Klug,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America

  • Julia Langenberg,

    Affiliation Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America

  • Sallie J. Dahmes,

    Affiliation WASCO Inc., Monroe, Georgia, United States of America

  • David A. Osborn,

    Affiliation Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America

  • Karl V. Miller,

    Affiliation Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America

  • Robert J. Warren,

    Affiliation Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America

  • Gary L. Mason,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America

  • Edward A. Hoover

    Edward.Hoover@ColoState.edu

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America

Abstract

Key to understanding the epidemiology and pathogenesis of prion diseases, including chronic wasting disease (CWD) of cervids, is determining the mode of transmission from one individual to another. We have previously reported that saliva and blood from CWD-infected deer contain sufficient infectious prions to transmit disease upon passage into naïve deer. Here we again use bioassays in deer to show that blood and saliva of pre-symptomatic deer contain infectious prions capable of infecting naïve deer and that naïve deer exposed only to environmental fomites from the suites of CWD-infected deer acquired CWD infection after a period of 15 months post initial exposure. These results help to further explain the basis for the facile transmission of CWD, highlight the complexities associated with CWD transmission among cervids in their natural environment, emphasize the potential utility of blood-based testing to detect pre-clinical CWD infection, and could augur similar transmission dynamics in other prion infections.

Introduction

Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a fatal transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE), or prion disease, marked by a high transmission efficiency among cervids. Since its identification in cervid populations of northern Colorado and southeastern Wyoming [1][3], CWD has now been identified in 15 states, 2 Canadian provinces, and one Asian country [4][6]. Captive deer studies and epidemiological models of CWD prevalence and risk, suggest that the facile transmission of CWD between cervids occurs primarily by horizontal/lateral means [7][10]. CWD in farmed and free-ranging cervids has caused substantial economic, ecological, trade, and cultural impact and carries with it the potential for human and domestic animal health risk [11][20]. The latter, while at present theoretical, is shaped by the occurrence of human variant Creutzfelt Jacob Disease (vCJD) arising from consumption of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) [21][23] contaminated beef [24]. As with BSE, humans appear to be separated from CWD by a demonstrable species barrier [25], [26]. Nevertheless, the presence of infectious prions in the saliva and blood of terminal CWD-infected deer [27] provide a possible mechanism for natural transmission among cervids and provide an exposure risk to humans and domestic livestock. Additionally, demonstrated CWD infectivity in saliva and blood raises questions regarding the potential for horizontal transmission of other prion infections, especially during the subclinical or pre-symptomatic phase of disease as has been reported with blood transfusion of human vCJD [28][30], sheep scrapie [31], [32], and BSE infection [33][35].

We undertook the present studies to confirm our earlier findings on prion excretion through bioassays in white-tailed deer, but also to determine: (a) whether CWD prions are present in body fluids and excretions during the pre-clinical phase of infection, and (b) whether repeated environmental fomite exposure alone, vs. direct animal-to-animal contact, was sufficient to transmit CWD in deer.

Results

Detection of CWD infection in exposed animals

Blood (cohort 1).

Each naïve deer received blood by the IV route from pre-clinical CWD+ source deer that were 10–12 months post inoculation (pi) (Tables 1, 2). Two of three recipient deer became PrPCWD tonsil biopsy positive at 12 months pi, but not at earlier sampling intervals (Fig. 1). At 19 months pi, when the cohort was necropsied, all three deer were CWD+, as indicated by detection of PrPCWD in the medulla oblongata at the level of the obex (medulla at obex) and in lymphoid tissue (Fig. 2).

thumbnail
Figure 1. PrPCWD detection by longitudinal tonsil biopsy and terminal necropsy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005916.g001

thumbnail
Figure 2. Immunohistochemistry results of deer exposed to body secretions and excreta from CWD+ deer.

PrPCWD demonstrated by immunohistochemistry in tonsil, brain (medulla oblongata at obex), and retropharyngeal lymph node of deer receiving saliva, blood, or environmental exposure from CWD-infected donors. CWD immunohistochemistry is shown in the medulla at obex (a–j) and either tonsil or retropharyngeal lymph node (k–t). Arrows indicate PrPCWD staining (red) within brain and lymphoid follicles. Arrow with * indicates lymphoid follicle negative for PrPCWD.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005916.g002

Saliva (cohort 2).

Each of the 3 deer in this cohort received saliva from pre-clinical CWD+ donors that were 6 to 13 months pi (Tables 1, 2). PrPCWD was detected in tonsil of 1 of the 3 inoculated deer at 12 months pi, but not at earlier time points. By 19 months pi, study termination, a second animal was CWD+, by detection of PrPCWD in brain and lymphoid tissue. The remaining deer was of necessity terminated at 16 months pi due to unmanageable aggressive behavior. This animal was CWD negative as determined by extensive western blot and IHC analysis (Figs. 1, 2).

Urine/feces (cohort 3).

Each of the 3 deer received repeated (90 daily) oral doses of urine and feces from CWD+ source deer ranging from pre-clinical to advanced clinical disease (Tables 1, 2). All of the recipient deer remained PrPCWD-negative throughout the 19-month study course (Table 1, Figs. 1, 2).

Environmental exposure (cohort 4).

The two animals in this cohort were exposed to daily introductions of feed buckets, water, and bedding removed from pens housing deer transitioning from pre-clinical to clinical phases of the disease (Table 1, 2). One of 2 exposed deer became tonsil biopsy PrPCWD-positive at 15 months pi. At study termination, 19 months pi, both animals were CWD+ (Figs. 1, 2).

Positive controls (cohort 5).

After oral inoculation with CWD+ brain homogenate, PrPCWD was detected in the tonsil of 4 of 4 inoculated deer at either 6 (n = 2), or 12 months (n = 2) pi (Figs. 1, 2 and Tables 1, 2).

Clinical signs of CWD

Project-dedicated caretakers intimately familiar with each animal observed the deer daily. Subtle clinical signs consistent with CWD were detected 12–20 months pi in 3 of 4 positive control animals (cohort 5), 2 of 3 animals receiving blood transfusion (cohort 1) and 1 of 3 deer orally inoculated with saliva (cohort 2). Clinical disease onset manifested primarily as perceived body muscle-mass reduction and gradual weight loss, which reached ≥20% of maximum body weight over 2 to 8 months. Other clinical signs included: rough hair coat due to piloerection and a body stance characterized by a low head position and wide leg stance. Changes in behavior included hyperphagia and polydipsia despite weight loss, and stereotypic movements including head tossing, repetitive and exaggerated lifting of the legs, diminished alertness, and occasionally aggressive behavior in the advanced stage of disease. Animals were euthanized when they displayed advanced clinical signs of CWD or at 19 months pi.

Detection of PrPCWD in tissues at necropsy

Nineteen months after inoculation, all animals testing CWD− by tonsil biopsy in cohorts 1–4 were euthanized and necropsied. Two of 4 cohort 5 (positive control) deer and 2 of 3 cohort 1 (blood) tonsil-biopsy-positive deer were euthanized due to advanced clinical signs of CWD at 13, 24, 26 and 29 months pi, respectively. Earlier studies established that medulla at obex, tonsil and retropharyngeal lymph node had highest frequency of PrPCWD deposition in infected deer [36]. Therefore, these tissues were rigorously examined in all animals. The results of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and western blot (WB) assays for PrPCWD correlated with each other and with previous positive tonsil-biopsy results in 10 of 13 animals (Fig. 1). In 3 animals, however, (one each in the blood, saliva and positive control inoculation cohorts) in which previous tonsil biopsies had been negative, PrPCWD was detected in tonsil, retropharyngeal lymphoid tissues and brain collected at necropsy (Fig. 1). Western blot analysis confirmed IHC results (Fig. 2) in all cases, and demonstrated the characteristic proteinase K-resistant 28–35 kd bands typical of PrPCWD (Fig. 3).

thumbnail
Figure 3. Western blot results of deer exposed to body secretions and excreta from CWD+ deer.

Western blot demonstration of the typical PK digestion band shift (28–35 kD) associated with prion infection in the brain (medulla oblongata at obex) of deer receiving blood, brain, saliva or environmental exposure, but not urine and feces from CWD-infected donors. Lanes 1–4 represent CWD+/− deer controls (10% brain homogenate of medulla at obex) without and with PK digestion at 25 µg/ml. Lanes 5–12, 10% brain homogenate of blood, brain, urine/feces or saliva inoculated deer without and with PK digestion at 25 µg/ml. Lanes 13–15, brain homogenate from deer environmentally exposed to CWD+ fomites without and with PK digestion at 25 and 50 µg/ml.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005916.g003

Discussion

Time interval to detection of CWD infection by tonsil biopsy

The high transmission rate of CWD among cervids in their natural environment sets CWD apart from other prion diseases. The results of this study help provide a plausible basis for this facile transmission and extend our earlier findings [27] (Fig. 4) in demonstrating infectious prions in blood and saliva of pre-clinical CWD+ donors. The time from exposure to first detection of PrPCWD by tonsil biopsy was variable—as short as 6 months but as long as 18 months. We assume that the time until appearance of PrPCWD in tonsil is an underestimate due to the inherent variability in prion deposition kinetics [36] and the logistical limitations of tonsil biopsies, which require general anesthesia. The incubation periods prior to clinical CWD in our study were similar to those observed previously in experimental and naturally acquired infections [27], [37], [38]. While we can not exclude horizontal transmission from the first positive deer in each cohort, the timeframe for detection in the remaining deer (3 months) is less than half that which we have historically observed in deer inoculated orally with a brain homogenate from terminal CWD-infected deer [27], suggesting much earlier exposure to infectious prions.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Summary of naïve deer exposed to inoculum from CWD+ deer—combined with our previous published findings

[27].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005916.g004

Infectious prions in saliva of CWD+ deer

The presence of infectious CWD prions in saliva suggests the potential for disease transmission via grooming interactions, shared water sources and communal feeding grounds—especially in high density cervid populations, such as those that exist for some cervid species during the breeding season, at baiting sites, in captivity, and in low predation situations. Other investigators have detected the presence of the aberrant misfolded prion protein (PrPRES) in alimentary tract tissue, and have suggested saliva as a possible vehicle for prion transmission [27], [37], [39], [40]. While the volume of saliva used in this study was large, the results nevertheless provide evidence to support the above premise. Salivary dissemination of prions may not be limited to CWD. Prions associated with transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) have been detected in the submandibular salivary gland of mink [41] and TME protease-resistant prion protein has been detected in the lamina propria of the oral cavity, taste buds and squamous epithelium of the tongue, and the vomeronasal organ and olfactory mucosa of infected hamsters [40]. Hamster-adapted scrapie agent has been found in the tongue and taste buds of prion-infected hamsters [42]. Vascellari et al reported the presence of the pathological prion protein in both major and minor salivary glands of naturally and experimentally infected sheep [43], and we have made similar observations in the olfactory mucosa of ferrets experimentally infected with CWD [44] and in the taste buds of deer (Haley, NJ, personal communication). The exact source of prions shed in saliva remains speculative; possible sources include centrifugal/retrograde passage from nerve fiber terminations in the oral–nasal mucosa, or from lymphoid cells emanating from infected tonsilar or other alimentary lymphoid tissues.

Infectious prions in blood of CWD+ deer

Blood-borne transmission of TSEs has long been feared, and the identification of a prion pathogen associated with blood-borne transmission has been pursued with disparate results [33], [45], [46]. Here we report the induction of CWD infection by a single blood transfusion from each of two pre-clinical CWD+ blood donors. This result is consistent with previous findings in substantiating the transmission of infectious prions by the blood of asymptomatic animal [27], [32] and human [28][30], [47], [48] donors, thus providing support for a subclinical hematogenous carrier state in TSE infections.

Direct detection of blood-borne PrPRES has been difficult. Saa et al were the first to use protein misfolding cyclic amplification assay (PMCA) [49], [50] to detect protease-resistant prion protein in the blood of asymptomatic scrapie-infected hamsters [51]. More recently, Thorne et al reported PMCA amplification of PrPSC from the blood of scrapie-infected sheep [52]. Continued efforts toward the development of sensitive, noninvasive, diagnostic tools are paramount. We are presently re-examining by serial PMCA the tissues of exposed but conventional PrPCWD test negative animals that may harbor infectious prions not manifested in the observation periods used in our CWD studies.

Hunter and colleagues [33], [34] provided the first evidence for blood-borne TSE transmission for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and scrapie by transfusion of whole blood [33], [34] and buffy-coat white blood cells [34] from infected donor sheep to naïve sheep. Sparse but compelling evidence has accumulated for blood transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD) [28][30], [48] and PrPRES has been found in peripheral organs of some sporadic CJD patients [53], raising the possibility that peripheral distribution of PrPRES is not limited to vCJD. In an ongoing study of sixty-six individuals who received blood products from asymptomatic blood donors who later developed vCJD [54], three of the 66 blood transfusion recipients developed vCJD 6.5 to 8.5 years after receiving blood [28], [30], [48] and a fourth blood recipient died of causes unrelated to vCJD five years after receiving the blood donation. Upon autopsy of this individual, PrPRES was detected in lymphoid tissue but not brain, thus providing presumptive evidence for a case of subclinical infection [29]. Our findings with CWD further support the tenet that blood products from subclinical prion-infected individuals may transmit disease.

Additional cases of subclinical human prion disease may exist. While in vitro conversion studies have indicated an inefficient conversion of human PrP into a protease-resistant form [26], [55] and no evidence exists of CWD transmission to non-cervid species cohabitating with or on CWD contaminated environments [24], [56][58], it is reasonable to surmise that cross-species transmission of prions may require extenuating circumstances, i.e. origin of specific strains [59], [60], prolonged incubation time [61], and permissive genotypes [62]. At least two studies provide information bearing on these concerns. The first study, an ongoing longitudinal study to closely monitor 81 Americans who inadvertently consumed, or were exposed to, CWD+ venison at an upstate New York sportsman's feast, will conduct health evaluations of these individuals over the next six years [63]. The second, a retrospective study using western blot analysis of human tonsil and appendix samples collected in the United Kingdom (UK) to investigate possible exposure to the BSE agent, reported the detection of abnormal prion protein in three of 12,674 samples [64]. Mathematical modeling based on the results of this study predicts a minimum estimate of 3000 BSE infected people in the UK between 10–30 years of age. If this model is accurate, it predicts that 93% of these individuals could develop long-term subclinical infection [65].

Environmental sources of CWD infection

Previous studies have confirmed direct animal-to-animal contact—horizontal transmission—as an efficient mode for prion disease transmission [9], [66]. Moreover, Miller and colleagues [9], [67], [68] have provided substantial evidence for environmental contamination as a source of CWD infection. Our bioassay study inocula doses (50 ml saliva/deer), while efficient in establishing the infectious nature of saliva, are likely unrealistic doses to be acquired in a natural setting. To emulate a more feasible natural environment-associated dose, while negating direct animal-to-animal contact, we exposed naïve deer to repeated exposures to fomites from the suites of CWD-infected deer. The study design was meant to mirror the daily habits and movements of a deer in its natural setting in which it may return to an area contaminated with small amounts of infectious prions over time. Here we provide the first report that under controlled indoor conditions CWD-naïve deer can acquire infection by exposure to fomites from the environment of CWD-infected deer, supporting the findings of Miller et al in the natural environment [9], [67], [68], in demonstrating that there are sufficient infectious prions in bedding and water to transmit CWD. Efficient transmission, as evidenced by tonsillar lymphoid PrPCWD detection, was seen in as little as 15 months post initial exposure. These results are also consistent with the findings of Georgsson [69] and Miller [67] as part of their attempts to decontaminate areas heavily contaminated with scrapie and CWD. Animals reintroduced to these areas after decontamination developed clinical signs of prion disease within two years. The presence of infectious CWD prions in the environment therefore strongly suggests that natural prion infection occurs by routes additional to direct animal-to-animal contact. Based on the present and our previous findings [27], we speculate that saliva may harbor the greatest concentration of CWD prions available for horizontal transmission and environmental contamination, but recognize that other routes of excretion at lower concentration and greater volume still remain plausible.

Lack of detectable infectious prions in the urine and feces of CWD+ deer

Previous studies have postulated that environmental contamination by excreta from infected cervids seems the most plausible explanation for the dissemination of CWD [70], yet at 19 months pi we were not able to detect PrPCWD in the three deer inoculated with urine and feces. Our earlier report [27] indicated that 2 of 2 deer expressing the prnp gene G/S polymorphism at codon 96 remained negative 19 mo. pi. In the present study all three deer inoculated with urine and feces expressed the G/G polymorphism at prnp codon 96, which is associated with susceptibility to CWD infection [71]. We report no detection of PrPCWD in the obex or lymphoid tissues of deer with either G/G or G/S polymorphisms at 19 mo pi. Although both of our bioassay studies in deer have failed to transmit CWD infection by oral exposure to urine and feces from CWD-infected deer, these results must still be interpreted with caution in light of ongoing PMCA and cervid transgenic mouse intracerebral bioassay studies which suggest that very low concentrations of prions may be present in urine and feces of CWD+ cervids [72][74]. Perhaps an incubation time longer than 19 months is necessary for a detectable accumulation of lymphoid PrPCWD, or a larger dose of inoculum by the oral route is necessary for efficient passage of prions across the alimentary mucosa.

In summary, the results reported here reconfirm that blood and saliva are sources of infectious CWD prions, consistent with previous findings [27], and further support a mechanism for efficient CWD transmission in nature. We also show that infectious prions shed into the environment by CWD+ deer are sufficient to transmit the disease to naïve deer in the absence of direct animal-to-animal contact. These observations reinforce the exposure risk associated with body fluids, excreta, and all tissues from CWD+ cervids and suggest that similar dynamics may exist in other prion infections.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

All animals were handled in strict accordance with good animal practice as defined by relevant national and/or local animal welfare bodies, and all animal work was approved by Colorado State University Animal and Care Use Committee (ACUC approval number 08-175A-01).

White-tailed deer

White-tailed deer fawns were provided by the Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens (UGA)—a region where CWD has not been detected. The deer fawns were hand-raised and human and indoor-adapted before overnight transport directly to the Colorado State University (CSU) CWD research indoor isolation facility without contact with the native Colorado environment. The 4-month-old fawns were adapted to the facility housing conditions and diet for 2 months before study start.

Genotyping

All white-tailed deer were genotyped to determine GG/GS (codon 96) status by the laboratory of Dr. Katherine O'Rourke, USDA-ARS, Pullman, WA.

Biocontainment protocols

Protocols to preclude extraneous exposure and cross-contamination between cohorts of animals as previously described [27] incorporated protective shower-in requirements, Tyvek™ clothing, masks, head covers, and footwear, while maintaining stringent husbandry. Tonsil biopsy and terminal sample collections were taken with animal-specific biopsy and sample collection instruments to minimize possibility of cross contamination. Bedding and liquid waste from each suite was either incinerated or collected in a dedicated outdoor underground holding tank and denatured by alkaline digestion.

Inoculation cohorts

Groups of n = 2 to 4 six-month-old fawns (Table 1) were housed in separate isolation suites throughout the study. Suite-dedicated protective clothing, utensils, and waste disposal were incorporated to exclude cross contamination by fomites, bedding, food, excretions, or contact.

Inocula (route of inoculation; volume of inocula; months pi of donor animals)

The following inocula were used: Blood (intravenous- IV; 1 transfusion of 225 ml; 10–12 mo pi), saliva (oral- PO; 10 ml/day for 5 days = 50 ml total; 6–13 mo pi) were obtained from serial sample collections of pre-clinical CWD-inoculated, tonsil biopsy positive deer, while urine and feces (PO; 90 daily doses totaling 85 ml urine+112.5 gr feces; 3–24 mo pi) were obtained from serial sample collections of pre-clinical and clinical CWD-inoculated, tonsil biopsy positive deer housed in the CSU CWD isolation facility[27]. Positive control brain (PO; 1 gr/day for 5 days = 5 gr total; terminal field samples) homogenates (medulla oblongata at the level of the obex) that were confirmed as CWD+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were from one of two sources– either free-ranging white-tailed deer collected by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) (n = 2) or a free-ranging mule deer utilized in a previous bioassay study[27] provided by the Colorado State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (CSVDL) (n = 2). For the environmental exposure study, water, feed buckets, and bedding were collected on a daily basis from CWD+ deer (3 to 24 months pi) that were part of ongoing studies in the CSU CWD research facility. The cohort of environmentally exposed deer was in uninterrupted contact with a continually refreshed supply of CWD+ fomites for 19 months (Table 2).

Monitoring and sample collection

All animals were monitored for evidence of CWD infection by serial tonsil biopsies taken at 3, 6, 12 months pi, and at study termination. Tonsil tissue was divided and equal portions either stored at −70°C or fixed in 10% formalin for 24 hours before processing for IHC. At the same sampling intervals, blood, saliva, feces, and urine were collected from each animal and stored at −70°C. At necropsy, palatine tonsils, brainstem (medulla at the obex) and retropharyngeal lymph nodes, as well as other tissues, were collected for examination by IHC and western blotting (WB) to identify the presence of the protease-resistant prion protein associated with CWD (PrPCWD).

Western blotting

Tissue homogenates were prepared from the obex region of the medulla oblongata encompassing the dorsal motor vagal nucleus (medulla at the obex). Twenty percent (20%) w/v homogenates were prepared in NP-40 buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 7.5, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) by Fastprep™ disruption at setting 6.5 for 45 seconds. Twenty-five µl of each homogenate was mixed with 5 µl proteinase K (PK) (Invitrogen) to a final concentration of 25 µg/ml and incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C with shaking. Proteinase K activity was stopped with 4 µl 200 mM Pefablock SC and an equivalent volume of each sample was mixed with 10 µl sample buffer (Invitrogen−20% Reducing agent 10×, 50% LDS Sample buffer 4×), 5 µl NP-40 buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 0.5% nonylphenoxylpolyethoxylethanol), heated to 95°C for 5 minutes and separated by 12% Bis-Tris precast polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) (Invitrogen) at 150 volts for 2.5 hours in 1× MOPS (Invitrogen). PAGE separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane for 1 hour at 100 volts in transfer buffer (0.025 M Trizma base, 0.2 M glycine, 20% methanol, pH 8.3). After the PVDF membranes were blocked overnight at room temperature in Pierce Blocker™ they were probed with the PrP specific antibody BAR224 (kindly supplied by Dr. J. Grassi) followed by horse radish peroxidase (HRP)-goat anti-mouse IgG diluted in Pierce Blocker™. Membranes were washed for 1 hour after blocking and between antibodies with wash buffer (0.1 M Tris, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.2% Tween 20 pH 8.0). To visualize PrP bands the PVDF membranes were developed with the Amersham™ ECL detection system and a digital GelDoc™ (Fuji Intelligent dark box) using LAS-3000 Lite ImageReader software.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed by employing protocols as described by Spraker et al [3]. Briefly, 3–5 mm sections of formalin fixed formic acid treated tissues were deparafinized at 60–70°C for 1 hour, rehydrated via a series of xylene/ethanol baths, and treated in formic acid a second time (5 minutes) prior to a 20 minute antigen retrieval (Dako Target Retrieval Solution 10×) cycle in a 2100 Retriever™ (PickCell Laboratories). Slides were further processed with the aid of a Ventana Discovery™ autostainer utilizing the Ventana Red Map™ stain kit, the PrPCWD specific primary antibody BAR224 and a biotinylated secondary goat anti mouse antibody (Ventana). After autostaining, the slides were quickly rinsed in a warm water detergent solution, passed through a series of dehydration baths and cover-slipped.

Acknowledgments

We thank Katrina Albarado, Danyahl Robison, Jennifer Finn and Heidi Kinsell for their dedication to the PRRL project, Nathaniel Denkers, Davis Seelig and Nicholas Haley for their necropsy expertise, and Katherine O'Rourke and Linda Hamburg for generously genotyping the deer.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CKM EAH. Performed the experiments: CKM SAH JGP JHK. Analyzed the data: CKM GLM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JL SJD DAO KVM RJW. Wrote the paper: CKM. Paper editing: EAH JGP JL.

References

  1. 1. Williams ES, Young S (1980) Chronic wasting disease of captive mule deer: a spongiform encephalopathy. J Wildl Dis 16: 89–98.
  2. 2. Williams ES, Young S (1992) Spongiform encephalopathies in Cervidae. Rev Sci Tech 11: 551–567.
  3. 3. Spraker TR, Miller MW, Williams ES, Getzy DM, Adrian WJ, et al. (1997) Spongiform encephalopathy in free-ranging mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) in northcentral Colorado. J Wildl Dis 33: 1–6.
  4. 4. United States Geographical Survey NWHC (2009) Map of Chronic Wasting Disease in North America. 〈http://www.nwhc.usgs.gov/disease_information/chronic_wasting_disease/index.jsp〉. Accessed.
  5. 5. Sohn HJ, Kim JH, Choi KS, Nah JJ, Joo YS, et al. (2002) A case of chronic wasting disease in an elk imported to Korea from Canada. J Vet Med Sci 64: 855–858.
  6. 6. Kim TY, Shon HJ, Joo YS, Mun UK, Kang KS, et al. (2005) Additional cases of Chronic Wasting Disease in imported deer in Korea. J Vet Med Sci 67: 753–759.
  7. 7. Miller MW, Wild MA, Williams ES (1998) Epidemiology of chronic wasting disease in captive Rocky Mountain elk. J Wildl Dis 34: 532–538.
  8. 8. Miller MW, Williams ES, McCarty CW, Spraker TR, Kreeger TJ, et al. (2000) Epizootiology of chronic wasting disease in free-ranging cervids in Colorado and Wyoming. J Wildl Dis 36: 676–690.
  9. 9. Miller MW, Williams ES (2003) Prion disease: horizontal prion transmission in mule deer. Nature 425: 35–36.
  10. 10. Williams ES, Miller MW (2002) Chronic wasting disease in deer and elk in North America. Rev Sci Tech 21: 305–316.
  11. 11. Belay ED, Maddox RA, Williams ES, Miller MW, Gambetti P, et al. (2004) Chronic wasting disease and potential transmission to humans. Emerg Infect Dis 10: 977–984.
  12. 12. Joly DO, Samuel MD, Langenberg JA, Blanchong JA, Batha CA, et al. (2006) Spatial epidemiology of chronic wasting disease in Wisconsin white-tailed deer. J Wildl Dis 42: 578–588.
  13. 13. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2008) A Plan for Managing Chronic Wasting Disease in Wisconsin: The Next 10 Years.
  14. 14. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission A (2007) Chronic Wasting Disease Response Plan.
  15. 15. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation NY (2009) Chronic Wasting Disease.
  16. 16. The Texas Animal Health Commission and The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department T (2003) Texas Chronic Wasting Disease Management Plan.
  17. 17. Pennsylvania Inter-agency CWD task force; Govenor's Office PGC, the state Department of Agriculture, the US Department of Agriculture, the state Department of Health, the state Department of Environmental Protection and the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (2007) Pennsylvania's Chronic Wasting Disease Response Plan.
  18. 18. Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Wildlife Division MDoA-AID (2002) Michigan Surveillance and Response Plan for Chronic Wasting Disease of Free-Ranging and Privately-Owned/Captive Cervids.
  19. 19. Michigan Department of Natural Resources MDoA (2008) Chronic Wasting Disease in Michigan.
  20. 20. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources O (2008) Ontario's CWD Surveillance and Response Plan.
  21. 21. Will RG, Ironside JW, Zeidler M, Cousens SN, Estibeiro K, et al. (1996) A new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the UK. Lancet 347: 921–925.
  22. 22. Bruce ME, Will RG, Ironside JW, McConnell I, Drummond D, et al. (1997) Transmissions to mice indicate that ‘new variant’ CJD is caused by the BSE agent. Nature 389: 498–501.
  23. 23. Hill AF, Desbruslais M, Joiner S, Sidle KC, Gowland I, et al. (1997) The same prion strain causes vCJD and BSE. Nature 389: 448–450.526
  24. 24. Bosque PJ (2002) Bovine spongiform encephalopathy, chronic wasting disease, scrapie, and the threat to humans from prion disease epizootics. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2: 488–495.
  25. 25. Kong Q, Huang S, Zou W, Vanegas D, Wang M, et al. (2005) Chronic wasting disease of elk: transmissibility to humans examined by transgenic mouse models. J Neurosci 25: 7944–7949.
  26. 26. Raymond GJ, Bossers A, Raymond LD, O'Rourke KI, McHolland LE, et al. (2000) Evidence of a molecular barrier limiting susceptibility of humans, cattle and sheep to chronic wasting disease. Embo J 19: 4425–4430.
  27. 27. Mathiason CK, Powers JG, Dahmes SJ, Osborn DA, Miller KV, et al. (2006) Infectious prions in the saliva and blood of deer with chronic wasting disease. Science 314: 133–136.
  28. 28. Llewelyn CA, Hewitt PE, Knight RS, Amar K, Cousens S, et al. (2004) Possible transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by blood transfusion. Lancet 363: 417–421.
  29. 29. Peden AH, Head MW, Ritchie DL, Bell JE, Ironside JW (2004) Preclinical vCJD after blood transfusion in a PRNP codon 129 heterozygous patient. Lancet 364: 527–529.
  30. 30. Wroe SJ, Pal S, Siddique D, Hyare H, Macfarlane R, et al. (2006) Clinical presentation and pre-mortem diagnosis of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease associated with blood transfusion: a case report. Lancet 368: 2061–2067.
  31. 31. Hunter N (2003) Scrapie and experimental BSE in sheep. Br Med Bull 66: 171–183.
  32. 32. Houston F, McCutcheon S, Goldmann W, Chong A, Foster J, et al. (2008) Prion diseases are efficiently transmitted by blood transfusion in sheep. Blood 112: 4739–4745.
  33. 33. Houston F, Foster JD, Chong A, Hunter N, Bostock CJ (2000) Transmission of BSE by blood transfusion in sheep. Lancet 356: 999–1000.
  34. 34. Hunter N, Foster J, Chong A, McCutcheon S, Parnham D, et al. (2002) Transmission of prion diseases by blood transfusion. J Gen Virol 83: 2897–2905.
  35. 35. Peden AH, Ritchie D, Ironside JW (2005) Risks of transmission of variant Creutzfeld-Jakob disease by blood transfusion. Folia Neuropathol 43: 271–278.
  36. 36. Sigurdson CJ, Barillas-Mury C, Miller MW, Oesch B, van Keulen LJ, et al. (2002) PrP(CWD) lymphoid cell targets in early and advanced chronic wasting disease of mule deer. J Gen Virol 83: 2617–2628.
  37. 37. Miller MW, Williams ES (2004) Chronic wasting disease of cervids. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 284: 193–214.
  38. 38. Williams ES (2005) Chronic wasting disease. Vet Pathol 42: 530–549.
  39. 39. Hadlow WJ, Eklund CM, Kennedy RC, Jackson TA, Whitford HW, et al. (1974) Course of experimental scrapie virus infection in the goat. J Infect Dis 129: 559–567.
  40. 40. DeJoia C, Moreaux B, O'Connell K, Bessen RA (2006) Prion infection of oral and nasal mucosa. J Virol 80: 4546–4556.
  41. 41. Hadlow WJ, Race RE, Kennedy RC (1987) Temporal distribution of transmissible mink encephalopathy virus in mink inoculated subcutaneously. J Virol 61: 3235–3240.
  42. 42. Bartz JC, Dejoia C, Tucker T, Kincaid AE, Bessen RA (2005) Extraneural prion neuroinvasion without lymphoreticular system infection. J Virol 79: 11858–11863.
  43. 43. Vascellari M, Nonno R, Mutinelli F, Bigolaro M, Di Bari MA, et al. (2007) PrPSc in salivary glands of scrapie-affected sheep. J Virol 81: 4872–4876.
  44. 44. Sigurdson CJ, Mathiason CK, Perrott MR, Eliason GA, Spraker TR, et al. (2008) Experimental chronic wasting disease (CWD) in the ferret. J Comp Pathol 138: 189–196.
  45. 45. Eklund CM, Kennedy RC, Hadlow WJ (1967) Pathogenesis of scrapie virus infection in the mouse. J Infect Dis 117: 15–22.
  46. 46. Clarke MC, Haig DA (1976) The effect of homogenisation on the level of scrapie activity detected in cells from spleens of scrapie affected mice. Res Vet Sci 20: 106–107.
  47. 47. Cervenakova L, Yakovleva O, McKenzie C, Kolchinsky S, McShane L, et al. (2003) Similar levels of infectivity in the blood of mice infected with human-derived vCJD and GSS strains of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy. Transfusion 43: 1687–1694.
  48. 48. EuroSurveill (2007) Fourth case of transfusion-associated vCJD infection in the United Kingdom. Euro Surveill 12: E070118 070114.
  49. 49. Soto C, Saborio GP, Anderes L (2002) Cyclic amplification of protein misfolding: application to prion-related disorders and beyond. Trends Neurosci 25: 390–394.
  50. 50. Saborio GP, Permanne B, Soto C (2001) Sensitive detection of pathological prion protein by cyclic amplification of protein misfolding. Nature 411: 810–813.
  51. 51. Saa P, Castilla J, Soto C (2006) Ultra-efficient replication of infectious prions by automated protein misfolding cyclic amplification. J Biol Chem 281: 35245–35252.
  52. 52. Thorne L, Terry LA (2008) In vitro amplification of PrPSc derived from the brain and blood of sheep infected with scrapie. J Gen Virol 89: 3177–3184.
  53. 53. Glatzel M, Abela E, Maissen M, Aguzzi A (2003) Extraneural pathologic prion protein in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. N Engl J Med 349: 1812–1820.
  54. 54. Hewitt P (2006) vCJD and blood transfusion in the United Kingdom. Transfus Clin Biol Nov;13: 312–316.
  55. 55. Raymond GJ, Hope J, Kocisko DA, Priola SA, Raymond LD, et al. (1997) Molecular assessment of the potential transmissibilities of BSE and scrapie to humans. Nature 388: 285–288.
  56. 56. Gould DH, Voss JL, Miller MW, Bachand AM, Cummings BA, et al. (2003) Survey of cattle in northeast Colorado for evidence of chronic wasting disease: geographical and high-risk targeted sample. J Vet Diagn Invest 15: 274–277.
  57. 57. Anderson CA, Bosque P, Filley CM, Arciniegas DB, Kleinschmidt-Demasters BK, et al. (2007) Colorado surveillance program for chronic wasting disease transmission to humans: lessons from 2 highly suspicious but negative cases. Arch Neurol 64: 439–441.
  58. 58. Mawhinney S, Pape WJ, Forster JE, Anderson CA, Bosque P, et al. (2006) Human prion disease and relative risk associated with chronic wasting disease. Emerg Infect Dis 12: 1527–1535.
  59. 59. Benestad SL, Sarradin P, Thu B, Schonheit J, Tranulis MA, et al. (2003) Cases of scrapie with unusual features in Norway and designation of a new type, Nor98. Vet Rec 153: 202–208.
  60. 60. Manuelidis L, Fritch W, Xi YG (1997) Evolution of a strain of CJD that induces BSE-like plaques. Science 277: 94–98.
  61. 61. Manson JC, Cancellotti E, Hart P, Bishop MT, Barron RM (2006) The transmissible spongiform encephalopathies: emerging and declining epidemics. Biochem Soc Trans 34: 1155–1158.
  62. 62. Mead S, Poulter M, Uphill J, Beck J, Whitfield J, et al. (2009) Genetic risk factors for variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a genome-wide association study. Lancet Neurol 8: 57–66.
  63. 63. Garruto RM, Reiber C, Alfonso MP, Gastrich H, Needham K, et al. (2008) Risk behaviors in a rural community with a known point-source exposure to chronic wasting disease. Environ Health 7: 31.
  64. 64. Hilton DA, Ghani AC, Conyers L, Edwards P, McCardle L, et al. (2004) Prevalence of lymphoreticular prion protein accumulation in UK tissue samples. J Pathol 203: 733–739.
  65. 65. Clarke P, Ghani AC (2005) Projections of the future course of the primary vCJD epidemic in the UK: inclusion of subclinical infection and the possibility of wider genetic susceptibility. J R Soc Interface 2: 19–31.
  66. 66. Ryder S, Dexter G, Bellworthy S, Tongue S (2004) Demonstration of lateral transmission of scrapie between sheep kept under natural conditions using lymphoid tissue biopsy. Res Vet Sci 76: 211–217.
  67. 67. Miller MW, Williams ES, Hobbs NT, Wolfe LL (2004) Environmental sources of prion transmission in mule deer. Emerg Infect Dis June;10: 1003–1006.
  68. 68. Dickinson AG, Young GB, Stamp JT, Renwick CC (1965) An analysis of natural scrapie in Suffolk sheep. Heredity 20: 485–503.
  69. 69. Georgsson G, Sigurdarson S, Brown P (2006) Infectious agent of sheep scrapie may persist in the environment for at least 16 years. J Gen Virol 87: 3737–3740.
  70. 70. Miller MW, Wild MA (2004) Epidemiology of chronic wasting disease in captive white-tailed and mule deer. J Wildl Dis 40: 320–327.
  71. 71. O'Rourke K, Spraker R, Hamburg K, Besser T, Brayton K, Knowles D (2004) Polymorphisms in the prion precursor functional gene but not the psuedogene are associated with susceptibility of chronic wasting disease in white-tailed deer. J Gen Virol May;85: 1339–1346.
  72. 72. Gonzalez-Romero D, Barria MA, Leon P, Morales R, Soto C (2008) Detection of infectious prions in urine. FEBS Lett 582: 3161–3166.
  73. 73. Murayama Y, Yoshioka M, Okada H, Takata M, Yokoyama T, et al. (2007) Urinary excretion and blood level of prions in scrapie-infected hamsters. J Gen Virol 88: 2890–2898.
  74. 74. Safar JG, Lessard P, Tamguney G, Freyman Y, Deering C, et al. (2008) Transmission and detection of prions in feces. J Infect Dis 198: 81–89.