Abstract
Twenty chiral isochromene derivatives have been chromatographed on native and derivatized cyclodextrin stationary phases using HPLC. The most effective CSPs for the enantioresolution of these analytes in the reverse phase mode are the hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (Cyclobond RSP), the 2,3-dimethyl-β-cyclodextrin (Cyclobond DM), and the γ-cyclodextrin (Cyclobond II) stationary phases. The α-cyclodextrin (Cyclobond III), β-cyclodextrin (Cyclobond I), acetyl-β-cyclodextrin (Cyclobond AC), S-1-naphthylethyl carbamate-β-cyclodextrin (Cyclobond SN), and 3,5-dimethylphenyl carbamate-β-cyclodextrin (Cyclobond DMP) stationary phases also show enantioselectivities for some analytes. No enantioseparations were observed in the polar organic mode and only a few separations were found in the normal phase mode. The Cyclobond RSP CSP provided the best overall separations of these analytes in the reverse phase mode. The pH of the mobile phase and the nature of organic modifiers have little effect on the enantioresolution. The substituents on the isochromene ring greatly affect the chiral recognition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mo S, Wang S, Zhou G, Yang Y, Li Y, Chen X, Shi J (2004) J Nat Prod 67:823–828
Suzuki T, Okada C, Arai K, Awaji A, Shimizu T, Tanemura K, Horaguchi T (2001) J Heterocyc Chem 38:1409–1418
Isaka M, Kongsaeree P, Thebtaranonth Y (2001) J Antibiot 54:36–43
Potterat O, Zahner H, Volkmann C, Zeeck A (1993) J Antibiot 46:346–349
Poch GK, Gloer JB (1989) Tetrahedron Lett 30:3483–3486
Ali S, Read RW, Sotheeswaran S (1994) Phytochemistry 35:1029–1032
Hari L, De Buyck LF, De Pooter HL (1991) Phytochemistry 30:1726–1727
Mondal S, Nogami T, Asao N, Yamamoto Y (2003) J Org Chem 68:9496–9498
Wang W, Li T, Milburn R, Yates J, Hinnant E, Luzzio MJ, Noble SA, Attardo G (1998) Bioorg Med Chem Lett 8:1579–1584
Thines E, Anke H, Sterner O (1998) J Nat Prod 61:306–308
Yue D, Della Cà N, Larock RC (2004) Org Lett 6:1581–1584
United States Food and Drug Administration (1992) Chirality 4:338–340.
Armstrong DW, DeMond W (1984) J Chromatogr Sci 22:411–415
Armstrong DW, Ward TJ, Armstrong RD, Beesley TE (1986) Science 232:1132–1135
Stalcup AM, Williams KL (1992) J Liq Chromatogr 15:29–37
Camilleri P, Reid CA, Manallack DT (1994) Chromatographia 38:771–775
Risley DS, Strege MA (2000) Anal Chem 72:1736–1739
Armstrong DW US Patent (1985) 4539399
Mitchell CR, Armstrong DW (2004) In: Methods in Molecular Biology, Gübitz G, Schmid MG (Ed) Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ, USA, Vol. 243, pp. 61–112
Armstrong DW, DeMond W, Czech BP (1985) Anal Chem 57:481–484
Armstrong DW, Ward TJ, Czech A, Czech BP, Bartsch RA (1985) J Org Chem 50:5556–5559
Armstrong DW, Zukowski J (1994) J Chromatogr A 666:445–448
Armstrong DW, Chang LW, Chang SC, Wang X, Ibrahim H, Reid GR, Beesley TE (1997) J Liq Chromatogr Rel Technol 20:3279–3295
Mitchell CR, Desai M, McCulla R, Jenks W, Armstrong DW (2002) Chromatographia 56:127–135
Schumacher DD, Mitchell CR, Xiao TL, Rozhkov RV, Larock RC, Armstrong DW (2003) J Chromatogr A 1011:37–47
Cyclobond Handbook, Advanced Separation Technologies Inc, Whippany, NJ, USA, 2002
Acknowledgments.
We gratefully acknowledge the support of this work by the National Institutes of Health, NIH RO1 GM53825-08.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, X., Zhong, Q., Yue, D. et al. Separation of Enantiomers of Isochromene Derivatives by HPLC Using Cyclodextrin-Based Stationary Phases. Chroma 61, 205–211 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-004-0478-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-004-0478-3