Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Evidence for separate pathways for color and luminance detection mechanisms

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

We measure threshold versus contrast (TvC) functions for chromatic (red–green) and luminance sine-wave-grating stimuli for (1) the detection of luminance in the presence of color contrast and (2) the detection of color in the presence of luminance contrast. We find that, although these crossed TvC functions both display a dipperlike shape, their facilitation differs from that found for standard uncrossed dipper functions (luminance on luminance or color on color contrast). Their facilitation disappears (cross condition 1) or is reduced (cross condition 2) by randomized presentation of the phase of the test and the mask, and the remaining facilitation (cross condition 2) displays no spatial tuning. We argue that these crossed facilitatory interactions cannot be explained by detection mechanisms with common inputs from color and luminance contrast (a nonindependence of transduction), and we present evidence that instead they reflect the use of local cues in the stimuli. We also measure the luminance–luminance TvC function in the presence of a fixed suprathreshold color contrast. The results demonstrate that, even when the color contrast produces a masking of the luminance thresholds luminance–luminance facilitation still occurs. Thus the opposing effects of masking and facilitation can occur simultaneously. Furthermore, while luminance–luminance facilitation occurs independently of color contrast, masking can be produced by either contrast. This suggests that masking and facilitation have different underlying origins. Similar results are found for the color detection thresholds in the presences of a luminance pedestal. We conclude that there are separate pathways for the detection of color and luminance contrast, each with no input from the other contrast. We suggest that the cross masking reflects divisive interactions between these pathways that is restricted to high contrasts.

© 1994 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Visual interactions with luminance and chromatic stimuli

G. R. Cole, C. F. Stromeyer, and R. E. Kronauer
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7(1) 128-140 (1990)

Contrast dependence and mechanisms of masking interactions among chromatic and luminance gratings

Eugene Switkes, Arthur Bradley, and Karen K. De Valois
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5(7) 1149-1162 (1988)

Color–luminance interaction: data produced by oblique cross masking

Ram L. Pandey Vimal
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15(7) 1756-1766 (1998)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (15)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (12)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.