Skip to main content
Log in

Residual stresses in wires: Influence of wire length

  • Testing And Evaluation
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residual stresses are one of the causes of failures in structural components. These stresses may arise in the fabrication process from many causes. They cannot be easily accounted for because they are both difficult to predict and to measure. X-ray diffraction (XRD) is nowadays a widespread technique for measuring surface residual stresses in crystalline materials. Very small specimens are often used for this purpose due to geometrical restrictions of either the diffractometer sample holder or the component to be inspected. However, the cutting process itself may affect the residual stress state in these specimens, so measured stresses could be misleading. In this work, the influence of specimen length on residual stresses was investigated in cold-drawn ferritic and pearlitic steel wires by XRD measurements and finite element simulations. In the ferritic wires, numerical simulations coincide with experimentally measured stresses. However, in the pearlitic wires the effect of the stresses in cementite (which could not be measured by XRD) has to be taken into account to explain the observed behavior. The results obtained have shown that in both materials the cutting process affects residual stresses, so it is recommended that specimens larger than five times the wire diameter be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CUR: “Cases of Damage to Corrosion of Prestressing Steel,” Netherlands Committee for Concrete Research, Report 49, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1971.

  2. E. Philips: “Survey of Corrosion of Prestressing Concrete Water-Retaining Structures,” Australian Water Resources Council, Paper 9, Canberra, Australia, 1975.

  3. M. Elices, G. Maeder, and V. Sánchez-Gálvez: “Effect of Surface Residual Stress on Hydrogen Embrittlement of Prestressing Steels,” Brit. Corr. J., 1983, 18, pp. 80–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. LLorca and V. Sánchez-Gálvez: “Fatigue Limit and Fatigue Life Prediction in High Strength Cold Drawn Eutectoid Steel Wires,” Fatigue Frac. Eng. M., 1989, 12, pp. 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. LLorca and V. Sánchez-Gálvez: “Numerical Determination of the Influence of Residual Stresses on Fatigue” in Computational Plasticity, D.R.J. Owen, E. Hinton and E. Oñate ed., Pineridge Press, Swansea, UK, 1987, pp. 1123–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P.J. Webster and G. Mills: “Residual Stresses in a Steel Strand,” Physica B, 1997, 241–243, pp. 1270–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Katagiri, T. Sato, K. Kasaba, S. Sasaki, and H. Tashiro: “Effects of Post-Drawing Treatments on the Fatigue Strength of Eutectoid Steel Wires,” Fatigue Frac. Eng. M., 1999, 22, pp. 753–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Beretta and M. Boniardi: “Fatigue Strength and Surface Quality of Eutectoid Steel Wires,” Int. J. Fatigue, 1999, 21, pp. 329–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Ben Rhouma, C. Braham, M.E. Fitzpatrick, J. Lédion, and H. Sidhom: “Effects of Surface Preparation on Pitting Resistance, Residual Stress, and Stress Corrosion Cracking in Austenitic Stainless Steels,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2001, 10(5), pp. 507–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. I.C. Noyan and J.B. Cohen: Residual Stress: Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Van Acker: “Inwendige Spanningen in Koudvervordme Metalen en in Metaalmatrixcomposieten,” Ph.D. Thesis, K.U. Leuven, Belgium, 1996 (in English).

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Hauk and E. Macherauch: “A Useful Guide for X-Ray Stress Evaluation,” Adv. X Ray Anal., 1984, 27, pp. 81–99.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Masubushi: Analysis of Welded Structures. Residual Stress and Distortion and Their Consequences, Pergamon Press, Oxford-New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Peters, R. Snoeys and M. Mars: “Residual Stress in Grinding” in Advanced Fabrication Processes, Proc. Agard, Conference Proceedings, Neuilly Sur Seine, France, 1978, 256, pp. 2.1–2.15.

  15. E. Schneider and K. Goebbles: “Determination of Mechanical Stress by Polarized Shear Waves” in New Procedures in NDT, P. Holler ed., Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1983, pp. 551–60.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Sundström and K. Törrönen: “The Use of Barkhausen Noise Analysis in Nondestructive Testing,” Mater. Eval., 1979, 2, pp. 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Sharma, H. Mao, P. Bell and J. Xu: “Measurement of Stress in Diamond Anvils With Micro Raman Spectroscopy,” J. Raman Spectrosc., 1985, 16(5), pp. 350–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Carlsson and P.L. Larsson: “On the Determination of Residual Stress and Strain Fields by Sharp Indentation Testing. Part I: Theoretical and Numerical Analysis,” Acta Mater., 2001, 49, pp. 3179–91.

    Google Scholar 

  19. I.C. Noyan: “Effect of Gradients in Multi-Axial Stress States on Residual Stress Measurements With X-Rays,” Metall. Trans. A, 1983, 14A, pp. 249–58.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.W. Hertzberg, Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials, 9th ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1996, pp. 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.M. Atienza: “Tensiones Residuales en Alambres de Acero Trefilados,” Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain, 2001 (in Spanish).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen Inc.: ABAQUS Manual, version 5.8, Pawtucket, RI, 1998.

  23. T. Hamada, T. Hirouchi, and M. Akiyama: “A Numerical Study of Temperature in a Fine High Carbon Steel Wire Subjected to High Speed Drawing,” Wire J. Int., 2001, 34(5), pp. 86–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. O.C. Zienkiewicz and R.L. Taylor, The Finite Element Method, 9th ed., McGraw-Hill, London, UK, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.J.L. Crook and E. Hinton: “Comparison of 2d Quadrilateral Finite Elements for Plasticity Problems” in Computational Plasticity, D.R.J. Owen, E. Hinton and E. Oñate, ed., Pineridge Press, Swansea, UK, 1989, pp. 181–95.

    Google Scholar 

  26. K.J. Bathe, M. Kojic, and J. Walczak: “Developments in Methods for Large Strain Elasto-Plastic Problems” in Computational Plasticity, D.R.J. Owen, E. Hinton and E. Oñate, ed., Pineridge Press, Swansea, UK, 1989, pp. 263–75.

    Google Scholar 

  27. K. Van Acker, J. Root, P. Van Houtte, and E. Aernoudt: “Neutron Diffraction Measurement of the Residual Stress in the Cementite and Ferrite Phases of Cold Drawn Steel Wires,” Acta Metall. Mater., 1996, 44, pp. 4039–49.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Tomota, P. Lukás, D. Neov, S. Harjo, and Y.R. Abe: “In Situ Neutron Diffraction During Tensile Deformation of a Ferrite-Cementite Steel,” Acta Mater., 2003, 51(3), pp. 805–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruiz, J., Atienza, J.M. & Elices, M. Residual stresses in wires: Influence of wire length. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 12, 480–489 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1361/105994903770343042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1361/105994903770343042

Keywords

Navigation