Abstract
An investigation of wear and failure of babbit bushes was completed in this study. The results showed that wear at dry sliding of babbit obtained by plasma spraying was less than that of babbit in the as-cast state and after a deformation heat treatment. The failure of babbit bushes was caused by a simultaneous and interrelated exhibition of fatigue and wear processes that depend considerably on cohesion strength between the bush and the bearing base and accumulation of defects on the contact surface between the bush and the shaft.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.N. Garkunov: Tribology Engineering, Machinery, Moscow, 1989, pp. 120–33 (in Russian).
V.K. Petrichenko: Antifriction Materials and Sliding Bearings Reference Book, Mashgiz, Moscow, 1954, pp. 383 (in Russian).
M.M. Khrushchev: Fatigue of Babbits, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 1943, pp. 143 (in Russian).
M.M. Khrushchev and A. D. Kuritsyna: Friction and Wear in Machines, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow-Leningrad, 1950, pp. 76–82 (in Russian).
L.A. Sosnovsky: Statistical Mechanics of Fatigue Failure, Science and Engineering, Minsk, 1987, pp. 287 (in Russian).
A.J. Kennedy: Creep and Fatigue in Metals, Metallurgiya, Moscow, 1965, pp. 243–48 (in Russian).
I.M. Lyubarsky and L.S. Palatnik: Metal Physics of Friction, Metallurgiya, Moscow, 1976, pp. 162–78 (in Russian).
G.M. Sorokin: Friction Wear, 1992, vol. 13 (4), pp. 612–23 (in Russian).
O.A. Kaibyshev: Superplasticity of Industrial Alloys, Metallurgiya, Moscow, 1984, pp. 102–16 (in Russian).
J.P. Pathak and S.N. Tiwari: Wear, 1992, vol. 135, pp. 37–47.
F.A. Sadykov, V.A. Valitov, and N.P. Barykin: Mater. Eng. Performance, 1997, vol. 6 (1), pp. 73–76.
M.V. Zernin and A.V. Yakovlev: Plant Laboratory, 1997, No. 11, pp. 39–47 (in Russian).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barykin, N.P., Sadykov, F.A. & Aslanian, I.R. Wear and failure of babbit bushes in steam turbine sliding bearings. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 9, 110–115 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1361/105994900770346367
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1361/105994900770346367