Keywords
NaV1.7, SVmab1, ion channel, antibody, electrophysiology
This article is included in the Antibody Validations gateway.
This article is included in the Preclinical Reproducibility and Robustness gateway.
NaV1.7, SVmab1, ion channel, antibody, electrophysiology
Ion channels are attractive drug targets and small molecule therapeutic drugs to this protein family generate worldwide sales of approximately $12 billion1. Despite this attraction and the demonstrated involvement of ion channel antibodies in diverse autoimmune diseases2, no antibody-based ion channel therapeutic has progressed to the clinic, due to challenges in developing both optimal immunogens and robust screening processes to identify channel modulators3.
The genetically validated pain target NaV1.7 functions as a voltage-gated sodium channel expressed in nociceptive neurons in the peripheral nervous system4. NaV1.7 is comprised of four domains (DI-DIV), each containing six transmembrane (TMD) helices, in which TMD helices S1–S4 contain the voltage sensor region and TMD helices S5–S6 contain the pore region. Upon membrane depolarization, the voltage sensor domains, in particular the voltage sensor paddle comprised of S3, the S3–S4 loop, and S4, move outward resulting in pore opening, influx of sodium into the cell, and action potential firing5. Recently, Lee et al. described a monoclonal antibody SVmab1 targeted to a peptide loop between DII S3-4 in the voltage sensor paddle region, which bound a NaV1.7 DII voltage-sensor domain protein by ELISA and blocked NaV1.7 function by electrophysiology6. In particular, SVmab1, purified from a hybridoma, was reported to block human NaV1.7 currents in a use-dependent manner, in which repeated channel opening events uncovered the epitope for antibody binding in the paddle region, akin to antibody blockade of potassium channels6,7. The antigen used to generate SVmab1 was peptide VELFLADVEG, located in the DII paddle region and the sequence of this antibody was previously reported8.
We generated recombinant SVmab1 (rSVmab1) protein based on the publically available sequence information and evaluated its ability to bind peptide VELFLADVEG, purified DII voltage sensor domain protein, and cells expressing NaV1.7, as well as block NaV1.7 sodium currents in heterologous cells.
The amino acid sequences for the heavy and light chains of rSVmab1 were obtained from Table 2 of a publication8. The variable region heavy chain sequence corresponds to SEQ ID NO 4 and the variable region light chain sequence corresponds to SEQ ID NO 8 of this publication. Synthetic, human codon-optimized, reverse translated DNA was generated by Genewiz, and subcloned into pTT5 expression vectors (National Research Council Canada), containing murine IgG1 heavy chain or kappa light chain constant regions. The coding regions from the resulting constructs were confirmed by sequencing to match the published sequences8. Plasmids were purified (Endofree Quanta Mega Kit; MDI Healthcare Services India) and re-confirmed by both sequencing and diagnostic restriction digest prior to transfection. Heavy and light chain DNA constructs for rSVmab1 were transiently co-transfected into 1.6L of HEK293 6E cells in an Erlenmeyer shake flask.
Cells were grown in Freestyle F17 media supplemented with 4mM L-glutamine, 0.1% pluronic acid and 1x antibiotic solution (Freestyle F17: Invitrogen, #12338-026; L-glutamine: Himedia, #TC243-1Kg; Antibiotic-Antimycotic: Invitrogen, #15140-062; Pluronic F-68; Invitrogen, #24040032; Tryptone N1: TekniScience Inc, #19553). Transfections were performed using polyethylenimine (PEI; Polysciences, #23967), at a DNA–PEI MAX ratio of 1:2.88. At 24 hours post-transfection, the cells were supplemented with 0.5% Tryptone. Cells were harvested after 5 days of culture and the supernatant was used for antibody purification. Conditioned media was clarified and used for affinity chromatography using a MabSelect SuRe column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, #17-5199-01). Fractions containing antibody were pooled and further purified by ion exchange chromatography using SP-Sepharose Fast Flow resin (GE Healthcare). Protein purification and integrity were monitored throughout by SDS-PAGE using 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen, #NP0322), MES SDS Running Buffer (20X; Invitrogen, #NP0002), LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen, #NP0007) and stained with Simply Blue Safe (Invitrogen, #LC6065). Purified antibody was buffer exchanged via dialysis into 10mM sodium acetate (pH5.2), containing 9% sucrose and concentrated (30kD Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter unit; Millipore, #UFC801096). The concentration of the purified antibody was determined by the A280 method on a Nanodrop 2000c (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The final antibody sample was verified by analytical size exclusion chromatography-high performance liquid chromatography (SEC-HPLC) using a YMC-Pack Diol-200, 300 × 8 mm column (YMC Co. Ltd., ID: 0830002871 P/No. DL20S05-3008WT) equilibrated with 20mM sodium phosphate, 400mM sodium chloride, at a pH 7.2, maintaining a flow rate of 0.75ml/min. Finally, the rSVmab1 preparation was assayed for endotoxin levels using the Kinetic Endotoxin Assay (Charles River PTS Assay; 1.0-0.01 EU/ml Sensitivity PTS Cartridge, #PTS2001F) and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. The isotype-matched control antibody used for electrophysiology studies was a recombinant murine IgG1/kappa monoclonal derived from an unrelated immunization campaign. The positive control mouse monoclonal antibody, used for peptide and D2S domain binding ELISAs, was generated against the DII voltage sensor peptide sequence VELFLADVEG by Abmart, which corresponds to the exact sequence used to generate SVmab1.
Mass analysis of non-reduced rSVmab1 was performed on an Agilent TOF 6230 Mass Spectrometer coupled with an Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC system. HPLC Mobile phases A and B were 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and 90% n-propanol/0.1% TFA, respectively. The reverse-phase column was an Agilent Zorbax 300SB-C8, 3.5µm 2.1 × 50mm column (#865750-906), heated to 75°C. A 20µg aliquot of rSVmab1 was injected into the system. The sample was chromatographed at 0.2 ml/min with an 11 min gradient as follows: 20%B for 1 min; 20–70%B over 8 min; 70–100%B over 1 min; held at 100%B for 1 min. Mass spectrometer ionization and transmission settings were set as follows: Vcap, 5900V; fragmenter voltage, 460V; nebulizer gas, 25 psig; skimmer voltage, 95V; Oct RF Vpp voltage, 800V; and drying gas, 13 l/min.
DNA encoding human NaV1.7 amino acids 709–857 (GenScript; derived from sequence NM_002977.3; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NM_002977.3; NCBI Nucleotide RRID: SCR_004860) was cloned N-terminal to a 6x histidine affinity tag [D2S(709-857)-His6] in the pFastBac vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and a recombinant baculovirus was generated (Bac-to-Bac; Thermo Fisher Scientific). In total, 12L of Sf9 insect cells (3 × 106 cell/ml; Expression Systems) were infected with 5% (v/v) virus, incubated at 27°C for 48 h in spinner flasks, harvested by centrifugation and stored at -80°C until use. The remainder of the purification was conducted at 4°C. The frozen cell pellet (175 g wet weight) was resuspended in lysis buffer [25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 200 mM NaCl (TBS), containing 1% v/v protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., #P8340)], stirred until thawed and disrupted by passing the suspension through a high pressure homogenizer at 10,000 psi (Microfluidizer M110EHI; Microfluidics, Corp.). The crude lysate was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min and the resulting supernatant collected and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1.5 h in a 70 Ti rotor. The supernatant was decanted and the 100,000 × g pellet was collected, resuspended in lysis buffer and homogenized prior to solubilization. N-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM; Anatrace, Inc.) was added to the resuspended membranes to a final concentration of 40 mM, incubated for 1h on a rocker, followed by centrifugation at 100,000 × g to pellet insoluble material. The DDM soluble fraction (100ml) was decanted and used for purification. Preparative chromatography steps were performed on an AKTA Purifier (GE Lifesciences, Inc.) in TBS containing 1 mM DDM, unless noted. SDS-PAGE with Coomassie Blue staining was used to monitor purification.
Analytical tryptophan fluorescence size exclusion chromatography (Trp FSEC) was used to monitor the oligomerization state of D2S(709-857)-His6 during purification. Trp FSEC was performed on a Superose 6 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) equilibrated with DDM buffer, using an Agilent HPLC system equipped with a fluorescence detector (272 nm excitation/327 nm emission). Absorbance at 280nm was used to determine the protein concentration of purified D2S(709-857)-His6. N-terminal amino acid sequencing confirmed the identity of purified D2S(709-857)-His6. The DDM soluble fraction was incubated with 10ml Talon Superflow resin (Clontech) for 14–16h on a rocker. The resin was collected into an XK 16 column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and washed with stepwise increases in imidazole concentration (10 c.v., 5mM; 10 c.v., 7.5mM; 5 c.v., 15mM; and 2 c.v., 25mM) in DDM buffer until the A280nm reached a stable minimum. Talon-bound protein was eluted with 200mM imidazole in DDM buffer. Fractions containing D2S(709-857)-His6 were pooled, concentrated in Ultracel-30K MWCO ultrafiltration units (Millipore Corp., Inc.) and chromatographed on a Superdex 200 10/300 column (GE Lifesciences, Inc.) to remove contaminating proteins and imidazole. The monodispersity of fractions containing D2S(709-857)-His6 was confirmed by Trp FSEC9. Monodisperse, micellar D2S(709-857)-His6 migrates at an apparent MW of 70kDa, which is similar in size to DDM micelles. Thus, the detergent concentrates during ultrafiltration and cannot be separated well using size exclusion chromatography (SEC), necessitating another Talon affinity step. SEC fractions containing monodisperse D2S(709-857)-His6 were pooled, and incubated with 0.5ml Talon resin for 2h. The resin was collected in a 2ml gravity column, washed, and protein was eluted with 200mM imidazole in DDM buffer. The eluate was loaded into a 0.5–3ml 10K MWCO Slide-a-Lyzer cassette (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and imidazole was removed by dialysis against DDM buffer. The dialyzed D2S(709-857)-His6 was collected, aliquoted, and frozen at -80°C.
A recombinant BacMam baculovirus expressing human NaV1.7 was constructed as follows. A full-length cDNA clone of human NaV1.7 was obtained from Origene (pCMV6-XL4-NaV1.7) and codon optimized using synthetic DNAs (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to produce a cDNA that was stable during DNA propagation in E. coli strain HB101. The resulting cDNA was cloned into pENTR-D-Topo (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the sequence was confirmed. pENTR-D-Topo-NaV1.7 was used in an LR Gateway reaction with pHTBV1.1 to produce pHTBV1.1-NaV1.7. After DNA sequence confirmation, pHTBV1.1-NaV1.7 was used in a transposition reaction to generate recombinant full-length baculoviral genomic DNA carrying NaV1.7, with transcription driven by the immediate early promoter from cytomegalovirus (Bac-to-Bac; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Transfection into Sf9 insect cells (Expression Systems) using FuGENE HD (Roche) allowed production of replication competent baculovirus, pseudotyped with VSV-G protein. The resulting transfection supernatant (P0 virus) was amplified twice, titered by endpoint dilution, as measured by gp64 expression (Expression Systems), and used in cell based assays.
Human NaV1.7 HEK293 stably transfected cells were purchased from Eurofins Pharma Bioanalytics Services US, Inc., and human NaV1.7 CHO-K1 stably transfected, inducible cells were purchased from Chantest.
HEK293 complete media contained D-MEM/F-12 (1X) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; US origin), 1x non-essential amino acids (NEAA; 10mM, 100X), 1x penicillin-streptomycin-glutamine (100X), and 400ug/ml Geneticin® Selective Antibiotic (all Invitrogen; #11330-033, #16000-044, 11140-050, 10378–016 and 10131-027, respectively).
CHO-K1 complete media contained F12 HAM (1X; Sigma-Aldrich, #N6658) with 10% FBS (US origin; Sigma-Aldrich, #F2442), 1x L-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich, #G7513), 0.4mg/ml Zeocin (Invitrogen, #46-0509), and 0.01mg/ml blasticidin (Gibco, #A11139-03). CHO-K1 stable cells were seeded at 8×610 cells in 20ml media with 1ug/ml tetracycline (Sigma-Aldrich, #T7660) and 100uM sodium butyrate (Sigma-Aldrich, #303410) in a T-175 flask and incubated 18–24hr prior to FACS analysis.
U-2 OS cells (ATCC; #HTB-96; RRID: CVCL_0042), cultured to 80% confluency, were rinsed with Ca and Mg-free DPBS (Gibco, #14190-144) and dissociated with Cell Dissociation Buffer (enzyme-free; Gibco, #13151-014) for 8–10 minutes in a 37°C incubator. Following addition of 5.0ml of complete growth medium, cells were dislodged with gentle pipetting, pelleted, and resuspended to 3×610 cells/5ml growth medium. Cells and human NaV1.7 BacMam virus added at 200 MOI were combined in a T-75 flask and incubated 18-24hr prior to FACS analysis.
U-2 OS complete media contains McCoy’s 5A with 10% FBS, 1x NEAA, 1x L-glutamine (200mM, 100X) and 1x penicillin-streptomycin (10,000U/ml, 100X) (all Gibco; #16600-082, #10099-141, #11140-050, #25030-081 and #15140-122, respectively).
The synthetic peptide VELFLADVEG (Abmart) was conjugated to maleimide-activated bovine serum albumin (BSA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, #PI-77116) through an N-terminal cysteine. The peptide was reconstituted to 10 mg/ml in DMSO and maleimide-activated BSA was made up to 10 mg/ml in dH2O. The BSA-conjugate was prepared by mixing 100ug of maleimide-activated BSA in 200uL PBS, 100ug synthetic peptide and 5mM TCEP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #PI-77720), and the reaction was incubated at room temperature overnight. BSA-conjugated synthetic peptide (VELFLADVEG) was coated at 1μg/ml on a Costar 384-well medium binding plate (#3702) using 40μL/well, in 1X PBS and incubated at 37°C for 1hr. The plate was washed three times with 90μL/well 1X PBS using a Biotek plate washer (ELx 405), blocked with 1% milk/1X PBS (90μl/well), and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Blocking buffer was aspirated and rSVmab1 or positive control mouse monoclonal antibody against the DII sensor peptide VELFLADVEG was titrated from 200nM using 40μL/well in 1X PBS/1% milk and incubated at room temperature for 1hr. Plates were washed three times with 90μL/well 1X PBS. Polyclonal goat anti-mouse Fc HRP (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, #115-035-164; RRID: AB_2338510) was added at 100ng/mL in 1X PBS/1% milk (40μL/well) and incubated at room temperature for 1hr. Plates were washed an additional four times and the HRP signal was detected with 1-Step TMB (40μL/well; Neogenm #308177) for 30min followed by quenching with 1N hydrochloric acid (40μL/well). Plates were read at OD450 (Thermo Multiskan Ascent).
Purified DIIS was coated at 2μg/ml on a 96-well NiNTA plate pre-blocked by the manufacturer with bovine serum albumin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #15442), (50μL/well), in 1X PBS/2mM n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM) detergent (Calbiochem, 324355), and then incubated at 37°C for 1hr. Plates were washed twice with 200μL/well of 1X PBS/2mM DDM. rSVmab1 or positive control mouse monoclonal antibody against the DII sensor peptide VELFLADVEG was titrated 1:2 from 13nM in 1% milk/1X PBS/2mM DDM (50μL/well) and then incubated at room temperature for 1hr. Following two washes with 200μL/well of 1X PBS/2mM DDM, polyclonal goat anti-mouse Fc HRP (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, #115-035-164; RRID: AB_2338510) was added at 400ng/mL in 1% milk/1X PBS/2mM DDM (50μL/well), and incubated at room temperature for 1hr. Plates were washed an additional four times and the HRP signal was detected with 1-step TMB (50μL/well), for 30min followed by quenching with 1N hydrochloric acid (50μL/well). Plates were read at OD450 (Thermo Multiskan Ascent).
Human NaV1.7 stably transfected HEK293 cells, human NaV1.7 stably transfected, inducible CHO-K1 cells, human NaV1.7 BacMam transduced U-2 OS and parental cells were treated with non-enzymatic dissociation buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, #C5914) to remove cells from the flask prior to FACS assays. In 96-well V-bottom plates (Costar, #3897), 50,000 cells/well were incubated with 33nM rSVmab1 or isotype control (R&D Systems, #MAB002; RRID: AB_357344; monoclonal mouse IgG1 isotype control) or positive control antibodies (Millipore, #MABN41; RRID: AB_10808664; monoclonal mouse anti-human NaV1.7 antibody10) in 50ul of FACS buffer (1X PBS+2% FBS; PBS: Hyclone, #SH30256.02; FBS: Sigma-Aldrich, #F2442, 500mL), and then incubated at 4°C for 1hr. Cells were isolated by centrifugation at 2500 RPM (664xg) for 2 min, the supernatant was removed and the cells were washed twice with 200ul/well FACS buffer. Cells were resuspended in 50ul (5ug/ml) polyclonal goat-anti-mouse IgG Fc Alexa 647 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, #115-605-071; RRID: AB_2338909) and 2.5ug/ml 7-aminoactinomycin D (7AAD; Sigma, #A9400) and incubated at 4°C for 15min. Cells were then washed once, resuspended in 50ul FACS buffer and read on a Becton Dickenson Accuri Flow Cytometer using the Intellicyt Hypercyt Autosampler. Single cells were gated and geometric means (GeoMean) of 7AAD-negative cells were analyzed using the Intellicyte Forecyt 3.1 software (Intellicyt; http://intellicyt.com/products/software/). A minimum of 350 live cell events were collected per well.
Human NaV1.7 stably transfected HEK293 cells, plated on glass coverslips (Warner Instruments, CS-8R, #64-0701) for 18–28 hr before recording, were voltage clamped using the whole cell patch clamp configuration at room temperature (21–24°C), using a MultiClamp 700B amplifier and DIGIDATA 1322A with pCLAMP 10.2 software (Molecular Devices; https://www.moleculardevices.com/systems/conventional-patch-clamp/pclamp-10-software; RRID: SCR_011323). Pipettes, pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries (World Precision Instruments), had resistances between 1.5 and 2.0MΩ. Whole cell capacitance was uncompensated and leak subtraction was not used. Currents were digitized at 50kHz and filtered (4-pole Bessel) at 10kHz using pClamp10.2. Cells were positioned directly in front of a micropipette connected to a solution exchange manifold for antibody perfusion. The external solution consisted of 140mM NaCl, 5.0mM KCl, 2.0mM CaCl2, 1.0mM MgCl2, 10mM HEPES, and 11mM glucose, with a pH 7.4 by NaOH. The internal solution consisted of 62.5mM CsCl, 75mM CsF, 2.5mM MgCl2, 5mM EGTA, and 10mM HEPES, with a pH 7.25 by CsOH. To record from closed/resting channels, cells were held at -120mV and pulsed to -10mV for 30msec at 0.1Hz. To record from partially inactivated channels, cells were held at -120mV initially and then switched to a voltage that yielded 20% channel inactivation. 30msec pulses to -10 mV were delivered every 10 sec, and peak inward currents were recorded before and after antibody addition. To record from slow inactivated NaV1.7 channels (P1) and following a train of depolarizing stimuli (P26), cells were voltage clamped to -110 mV for 3 sec and sodium currents were elicited by a train of 26 depolarizations of 150msec duration to -10 mV at a frequency of 5Hz. Cells were then clamped to -20mV while 500 nM rSVmab1, isotype-matched murine IgG1/kappa monoclonal antibody derived from an unrelated immunization campaign or 0.3% BSA control was added. At the 5 and 15 minute time points post-antibody addition, cells were reclamped to -110 mV for 3sec and put through the same 26 pulse voltage protocol as above. Peak inward current during the 1st (slow inactivated) or 26th (use-dependent) pulse to -10 mV in the presence of antibody was divided by the peak inward current evoked by the 1st or 26th pulse to -10 mV in the absence of antibody to determine percent inhibition. A separate use-dependent protocol was also employed that replicated conditions used by Lee et al.6, where cells were held at -120mV and sodium currents were elicited by a train of depolarizations of 30msec duration to -10mV at a frequency of 10Hz. All testing solutions had 0.3% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, #A2058) to prevent non-specific adhesion of proteins to tubing and recording chamber components, and solutions were perfused over cells at 1ml/min. The pore blocker tetrodotoxin (TTX; 500 nM; Alomone Labs, #T-550) was added at the end of experiments as a positive control for robust NaV1.7 inhibition. Data were analyzed with pCLAMP and all figures were plotted using Origin Pro8 (OriginLab Corp).
Recombinant SVmab1 (rSVmab1) was purified from transiently transfected HEK293 6E cells and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Figure 1A) and SEC-HPLC (Figure 1B). rSVmab1 migrated at an observed molecular weight of ~150kDa in non-reducing SDS-PAGE, comprised distinct and appropriately sized heavy chain and light chain bands in reducing SDS-PAGE, and eluted as a single sharp peak in SEC-HPLC. Collectively, these findings are consistent with the production of an intact antibody. Mass spectrometry analysis of non-reduced rSVmab1 revealed the major peak mass to be 147,938Da, which closely matched the theoretical mass of 147,936Da for an agalactosylated/fucosylated bi-antennary glycoprotein (Figure 2).
rSVmab1 binding to antigenic peptide was evaluated in an ELISA assay using peptide VELFLADVEG conjugated to BSA via an N-terminal cysteine residue. At 200nM rSVmab1, no peptide binding was observed, whereas binding of a positive control monoclonal antibody generated against this exact same peptide sequence was detected at a concentration as low as 2nM (Figure 3; Dataset 1). Next, purified DII voltage sensor domain protein, housing the SVmab1 epitope, was prepared as a detergent micelle in DDM and tested for rSVmab1 binding in an ELISA assay. At 13nM rSVmab1, no DIIS binding was observed, whereas binding of the positive control antibody, described above, was detected at concentrations <1nM (Figure 4; Dataset 2). Finally, FACS was used to assess rSVmab1 binding to HEK293, CHO-K1, and U-2 OS cells expressing human NaV1.7 protein. At 33nM rSVmab1, no cell binding was observed, whereas binding of a positive control NaV1.7 Ab was detected in all three cell lines (Figure 5; Dataset 3).
rSVmab1 was evaluated for functional inhibition of human NaV1.7 currents in HEK293 cells using whole cell manual patch clamp electrophysiology. Protocols that mimic conditions reported by Lee et al.6, as well as protocols that interrogate diverse NaV1.7 gating states, were employed. NaV channels exist in resting/closed states where the pore is shut, open states where sodium ions can permeate the pore, and one or more inactivated states where channels are recalcitrant to opening5. When 100nM rSVmab1 was applied to cells which were voltage clamped to a holding potential of -120mV with a 0.1Hz stimulation frequency, where NaV1.7 channels are in the closed/resting state, no reduction of sodium current was detected following 20min of antibody treatment (Figure 6; Dataset 4; p>0.05 comparing BSA control to rSVmab1). Notably, the pore blocker tetrodotoxin (TTX) robustly inhibited currents under these conditions. For comparison, 100 nM SVmab1 was reported to block closed/resting NaV1.7 by ~40% at 0.1Hz (Figure 3D of the study by Lee et al.6). Increasing the concentration of rSVmab1 to 500nM for 20min resulted in reductions of NaV1.7 current by 40% compared to reductions of 20% with an IgG1 isotype control (p=0.05 comparing rSVmab1 to IgG1 isotype control). rSVmab1 and IgG1 isotype control both yielded significantly larger current reductions compared to a BSA vehicle control group (Figure 7; Dataset 5; p<0.01 for BSA compared to IgG1 isotype control and p<0.01 for BSA compared to rSVmab1). Conductance-voltage relationships (Figure 7; Dataset 5) and steady-state fast inactivation curves (Figure 8; Dataset 6) demonstrated that rSVmab1 did not affect NaV1.7 gating properties. rSVmab1 was next evaluated in a use-dependent protocol using a 10Hz train of depolarizing stimuli (as per Lee et al.6) to repeatedly cycle NaV1.7 through open and inactive conformations in order to expose the SVmab1 epitope in the DII voltage sensor paddle region. Both 500nM rSVmab1 and an isotype control IgG1 antibody reduced tonic NaV1.7 current 30–35% in the first pulse of the train with nominal evidence of use-dependent block in later pulses of the train (Figure 9; Dataset 7; p>0.05 for all group comparisons). In all these studies, antibodies were incubated on cells for 20min with constant perfusion to accommodate a potentially slow on-rate. For comparison, 100nM SVmab1 was reported to block NaV1.7 current over 80% within 10sec (Figure 3C of the study by Lee et al.6), using this 10Hz protocol.
rSVmab1 was further evaluated using voltage protocols that place NaV1.7 channels in various inactivated states. When cells were voltage clamped at a potential that yielded 20% NaV1.7 inactivation, in which 20% of NaV1.7 channels are unavailable for opening and 80% of NaV1.7 channels are closed/resting, 500nM rSVmab1 and isotype control antibody decreased currents similarly around 30% after 15min of antibody treatment (p>0.05 for BSA, IgG1, and rSVmab1 comparisons), whereas TTX robustly blocked currents within seconds of application (Figure 10; Dataset 8). When cells were evaluated using a protocol that promotes transition of NaV1.7 into a slow inactivated state, by maintaining cells at a resting potential of -20mV during antibody addition and between voltage measurements, 500nM rSVmab1 and isotype control IgG1 Ab both decreased currents ~35% after 15 min, whereas TTX again robustly blocked currents (Figure 11, P1 tonic measurements; Dataset 9; p>0.05 for BSA, IgG1, and rSVmab1 group comparisons). Layering on a 5 Hz use-dependent protocol with 150msec depolarizing pulses following induction of slow inactivation resulted in current reduction by ~65% for rSVmab1 and isotype control IgG1 groups after 15min of antibody treatment (Figure 11, P26 use measurements; Dataset 9; p<0.01 for BSA compared to IgG1, p<0.05 for BSA compared to rSVmab1, p>0.05 for IgG1 compared to rSVmab1). In these experiments, effects of rSVmab1 were similar to those of the isotype control IgG1 antibody.
At the concentrations tested, recombinant monoclonal antibody SVmab1, generated from published sequence information8, did not bind to the following target sources: NaV1.7 peptide VELFLADVEG, NaV1.7 DII voltage sensor protein, and NaV1.7 expressing mammalian cells (HEK293, CHO-K1, U-2 OS). Recombinant SVmab1 also did not specifically block NaV1.7 currents in HEK293 cells, as assessed by whole cell manual patch clamp electrophysiology when channels were closed/resting, inactivated, or cycled through states to expose the voltage sensor paddle region using a train of depolarizing stimuli. Reductions in NaV1.7 current were comparable when using an isotype control IgG1 or recombinant SVmab1 at 500nM. It is unknown why both isotype control IgG1 and recombinant SVmab1 produced current reductions larger than BSA vehicle control in some voltage protocols. In the absence of positive binding data or specific NaV1.7 block, our results indicate that recombinant SVmab1 is not a robust large molecule NaV1.7 antagonist. It should be noted that Lee et al.6 utilized SVmab1 purified from a hybridoma, whereas the studies reported here employed recombinant SVmab1 purified from HEK293 6E cells. Differences in heavy and/or light chain antibody sequences from these sources could account for the observed differences in NaV1.7 binding and block. In addition, it is conceivable that differences in NaV1.7 glycosylation or beta subunit expression in HEK293 cells could impact epitope accessibility to SVmab1 in cell-based experiments; beta subunits have been reported to partially mask interactions between peptide toxins and NaV1.211,12. Other groups evaluating SVmab1 are encouraged to share their findings on NaV1.7 binding and block to inform the research community on the utility of this reagent.
Open Science Framework: Dataset: Evaluation of recombinant monoclonal antibody SVmab1 binding to NaV1.7 target sequences and block of human NaV1.7 currents, doi 10.17605/osf.io/4jbz713.
BC, LE, LG, DLim, DLiu, CMM, OP, BS, and MT conducted all experiments. DLiu, BC, CMM, CK and BDM conceived the experimental design. BC, CMM and BDM wrote the article.
All authors were full-time employees at Amgen, Inc. at the time the experiments were conducted.
This research was funded by Amgen, Inc.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
We would like to thank Carolyn Chu for assistance with antibody preparation, Emily Fogarty for assistance with ELISA screening, Joe Ligutti and Shanti Amagasu for assistance with cell preparation, Tina Meng, Paul Wang, Mukta Vazir and Fen-Fen Lin for BacMam NaV1.7 generation, and Zaven Kaprielian for critical review of the manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
References
1. Lee JH, Park CK, Chen G, Han Q, et al.: A monoclonal antibody that targets a NaV1.7 channel voltage sensor for pain and itch relief.Cell. 2014; 157 (6): 1393-404 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 25 Nov 16 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)