ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Data Note

A revised method for measuring distraction by tactile stimulation

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 12 Aug 2014
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Data: Use and Reuse collection.

This article is included in the Tics collection.

Abstract

Sensory hypersensitivity (SH) refers to the tendency to attend to subtle stimuli, to persist in attending to them, and to find them noxious. SH is relatively common in several developmental disorders including Tourette Syndrome and Chronic Tic Disorder (TS/CTD). This study was an attempt to quantify the extent to which a mild tactile stimulus distracts one’s attention in TS/CTD. Fourteen adults with TS/CTD and 14 tic-free control subjects completed questionnaires regarding SH and ADHD, and TS/CTD subjects completed self-report measures of current and past tic disorder symptoms and of current obsessions and compulsions. All subjects performed a sustained attention choice reaction time task during alternating blocks in which a mildly annoying stimulus (von Frey hair) was applied to the ankle (“ON”) or was not applied (“OFF”). We present here the clinical and cognitive task data for each subject.

Introduction

Tourette Syndrome and Chronic Tic Disorder (TS/CTD) are complex neuropsychiatric disorders in which patients present with multiple motor or vocal tics. In many patients with TS/CTD, attentional problems are present and ADHD is the most common condition that co-occurs with TS/CTD, occurring in about 50% of patients (Greimel et al., 2011). These attentional problems can range from mild to severe and can impact the patient’s ability to complete tasks, sustain attention, and keep track of personal items. Sensory hypersensitivity (SH; the tendency to be sensitive to subtle stimuli that most people would no longer attend to after habitation has occurred) is also commonly present in patients with TS/CTD (Belluscio et al., 2011). Patients with sensory hypersensitivity have difficulty tuning out otherwise neutral stimuli such as the tag in their shirt or the voices of people around them. In addition, patients with TS/CTD often experience a premonitory urge before a tic which some patients describe as a feeling of itchiness, pressure, tenseness, or energy. These tics and premonitory urges can also be distracting (Kane, 1994).

The observation that SH can distract one from a cognitively demanding task suggested the approach we used in a small pilot study to attempt to quantify SH by examining the effects of a tactile stimulus on reaction time during a sustained attention task (Panagopoulos et al., 2013). The present study was designed to improve on some of the earlier methods and to compare subjects with TS/CTD to tic-free controls, with the goal of quantifying the extent to which sensory hypersensitivity in patients with TS/CTD affects sustained attention. To do this, participants with and without TS/CTD performed an attention task in the presence and absence of a subtle sensory stimulus.

Methods

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Washington University Human Research Protection Office (IRB), proposal # 201108081.

Participants

A convenience sample of 14 adults with TS/CTD and 14 tic-free adults participated in the study. Subjects completed a questionnaire that included age, sex, and the question, “Have you ever been diagnosed with any of the following,” with check boxes for ADHD (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder), learning disorder, atopic (allergic) dermatitis, OCD (Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder), Tourette syndrome, other tic disorder, and other neurological illness (to be specified by the respondent). All participants also completed the 26-item Adult Sensory Questionnaire (ASQ), developed to screen for sensory defensiveness in adults (Kinnealey et al., 1995), and the ADHD Rating Scale (Barkley, 1998; Magnusson et al., 2006). Subjects endorsing tics also rated symptom severity for the past week using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS; Leckman et al., 1989), the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Goodman et al., 1989a,b), and the Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS; Woods et al., 2005). These data were collected using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at Washington University (Harris et al., 2009). For tic subjects, the Diagnostic Confidence Index (DCI) was also completed; the DCI assesses typical historical features of TS (Robertson et al., 1999).

Choice reaction time task

The subjects were seated at a fixed distance in front of a laptop computer in a darkened room. All subjects then performed a 12-minute choice reaction time task consisting of pressing one key on a computer keyboard when the capital letter ‘S’ appeared on the screen and pressing another key when the numeral 5 appeared on the screen. They were instructed to respond as quickly and accurately as possible with the right hand. The task consisted of 11 blocks; the first was a 2-minute OFF condition and the remaining blocks were each 1 minute long alternating between the ON and the OFF condition. Throughout the ON condition, a 4.74N von Frey hair was held against a point previously marked on the subject’s ankle, with ~1 Hz mild increases of pressure to just bend the von Frey hair. During the OFF condition, the von Frey hair was absent. E-Prime® 2 software was used to present stimuli and to collect all task data (www.pstnet.com/eprime.cfm; Schneider et al., 2002a,b).

Dataset 1.A revised method for measuring distraction by tactile stimulation: Subject characteristics and task data.
Subject_data2.csv: This file includes demographic and diagnostic data for each subject. Legend: Group = self-reported diagnosis (1=TS/CTD, 2=control). ADHD hx = self-reported history of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. OCD hx = self-reported history of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. ASQ = total score on the Adult Sensory Questionnaire. ASQ Pure = score from a subset of ASQ items (#1, 2, 4–14, 17, 23) that the authors felt were less likely to be affected by psychiatric comorbidity. See Methods for remaining abbreviations. task_data.7z: This file contains a text file for each subject with output from ePrime® including accuracy and reaction time data for the attention task session for each subject. The file can be opened by 7-Zip, free and open source archiving software (http://www.7-zip.org/).

Data availability

F1000Research: Dataset 1. A revised method for measuring distraction by tactile stimulation: Subject characteristics and task data, 10.5256/f1000research.4944.d34156 (Schechter et al., 2014).

Comments on this article Comments (2)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 12 Aug 2014
  • Author Response 19 Sep 2014
    Kevin J Black, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
    19 Sep 2014
    Author Response
    A preliminary analysis of these data was presented at a student research symposium:
    Schechter JR, Greene DJ, Koller JM, Black KJ: The effects of tactile stimulation on the attentional performance of ... Continue reading
  • Author Response 15 Sep 2014
    Kevin J Black, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
    15 Sep 2014
    Author Response
    The following was omitted from the reference list:

    Paul A. Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert Thielke, Jonathon Payne, Nathaniel Gonzalez, Jose G. Conde, Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – A metadata-driven methodology ... Continue reading
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Schechter JR, Greene DJ, Koller JM and Black KJ. A revised method for measuring distraction by tactile stimulation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] F1000Research 2014, 3:188 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.4944.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 12 Aug 2014
Views
39
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Sep 2014
Euripedes Constantino Miguel, Department of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil 
Marcelo Hoexter, Department of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil 
Approved
VIEWS 39
This is an interesting and relevant study that examines the effects of a tactile stimulus on reaction time during a sustained attention task in patients with Tourette syndrome/chronic tic disorder (TS/CTD) vs. non-TS/CTD subjects in order to quantify the extent ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Miguel EC and Hoexter M. Reviewer Report For: A revised method for measuring distraction by tactile stimulation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2014, 3:188 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.5280.r6165)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 18 Sep 2014
    Kevin J Black, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
    18 Sep 2014
    Author Response
    We thank Drs. Miguel and Hoexter for their thoughtful, forward-looking commentary, and appreciate their suggestions on phenomenology and characterizing comorbidity. I have followed earlier reports on the USP-SPS with great interest, but was ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 18 Sep 2014
    Kevin J Black, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
    18 Sep 2014
    Author Response
    We thank Drs. Miguel and Hoexter for their thoughtful, forward-looking commentary, and appreciate their suggestions on phenomenology and characterizing comorbidity. I have followed earlier reports on the USP-SPS with great interest, but was ... Continue reading
Views
37
Cite
Reviewer Report 08 Sep 2014
Andrea Cavanna, Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK 
Approved
VIEWS 37
This is an interesting and original research project. The methodology ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Cavanna A. Reviewer Report For: A revised method for measuring distraction by tactile stimulation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2014, 3:188 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.5280.r6060)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 08 Sep 2014
    Kevin J Black, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
    08 Sep 2014
    Author Response
    We appreciate Prof. Cavanna's assessment.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 08 Sep 2014
    Kevin J Black, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
    08 Sep 2014
    Author Response
    We appreciate Prof. Cavanna's assessment.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Comments on this article Comments (2)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 12 Aug 2014
  • Author Response 19 Sep 2014
    Kevin J Black, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
    19 Sep 2014
    Author Response
    A preliminary analysis of these data was presented at a student research symposium:
    Schechter JR, Greene DJ, Koller JM, Black KJ: The effects of tactile stimulation on the attentional performance of ... Continue reading
  • Author Response 15 Sep 2014
    Kevin J Black, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
    15 Sep 2014
    Author Response
    The following was omitted from the reference list:

    Paul A. Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert Thielke, Jonathon Payne, Nathaniel Gonzalez, Jose G. Conde, Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – A metadata-driven methodology ... Continue reading
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.