Keywords
Uniprot ID Q13148, TARDBP, TDP-43, antibody characterization, antibody validation, Western Blot, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence
This article is included in the Cell & Molecular Biology gateway.
This article is included in the YCharOS (Antibody Characterization through Open Science) gateway.
Uniprot ID Q13148, TARDBP, TDP-43, antibody characterization, antibody validation, Western Blot, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence
In this new version of the article, we have added the DOI to references 9,12 and 13. This is to make it easier for readers to access the citations. Thank you.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Makoto Urushitani
TDP-43, encoded by the TARDBP gene, is a DNA/RNA-binding protein implicated in RNA metabolism and processing.1 Belonging to the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) family of proteins that bind to RNA via highly conserved RNA recognition motifs, TDP-43 binds to UG-repeats with high specificity.1,2
Mutations in TARDBP that result in TDP-43 aggregation and neuropathology have been observed in distinct neurodegenerative diseases, known as TDP-43 proteinopathies.3,4 Various studies have identified a subset of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients that possess TARDBP mutations, suggesting that TDP-43 gain of toxic function or loss of function is a causative factor in sporadic and/or familial ALS.4–6 Mechanistic studies would be greatly facilitated by the availability of high-quality antibodies.
Here, we compared the performance of a range of commercially available antibodies for TDP-43 and characterized high-quality antibodies for Western blot, immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence, enabling biochemical and cellular assessment of TDP-43 properties and function.
Our standard protocol involved comparing readouts from wild-type (WT) and TARDBP knockout (KO) cells.7,8 The first step was to identify a cell line(s) that expresses sufficient levels of TDP-43 to generate a measurable signal. To this end, we examined the DepMap transcriptomics database to identify all cell lines that express the target at levels greater than 2.5 log2 (transcripts per million “TPM” +1), which we have found to be a suitable cut-off (Cancer Dependency Map Portal, RRID: SCR_017655). Commercially available HAP1 cells expressed the TARDBP transcript at RNA levels above the average range of cancer cells analyzed. Parental and TARDBP knockout HAP1 cells were obtained from Horizon Discovery (Table 1).
Institution | Catalog number | RRID (Cellosaurus) | Cell line | Genotype |
---|---|---|---|---|
Horizon Discovery | C631 | CVCL_Y019 | HAP1 | WT |
Horizon Discovery | HZGHC003730c001 | CVCL_TR64 | HAP1 | TADRBP KO |
For Western Blot experiments, we resolved proteins from WT and TARDBP KO cell extracts and probed them side-by-side with all antibodies in parallel (Figure 1).
For immunoprecipitation experiments, we used the antibodies to immunopurify TDP-43 from HAP1 cell extracts. The performance of each antibody was evaluated by detecting the TDP-43 protein in extracts, in the immunodepleted extracts and in the immunoprecipitates (Figure 2).
For immunofluorescence, as described previously, antibodies were screened using a mosaic strategy.9 In brief, we plated WT and KO cells together in the same well and imaged both cell types in the same field of view to reduce staining, imaging and image analysis bias (Figure 3).
In conclusion, we have screened TDP-43 commercial antibodies by Western Blot, immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence and identified several high-performing antibodies under our standardized experimental conditions.
All TDP-43 antibodies are listed in Table 2, together with their corresponding Research Resource Identifiers (RRID), to ensure the antibodies are cited properly.10 Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies are from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number 62-6520 and 65-6120). Alexa-555-conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies are from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number A21424 and A21429).
Company | Catalog number | Lot number | RRID (Antibody Registry) | Clonality | Clone ID | Host | Concentration (μg/μl) | Vendors recommended applications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proteintech | 10782-2-AP | 97534 | AB_615042 | polyclonal | - | rabbit | 0.60 | Wb, IF |
Proteintech | 12892-1-AP | 94163 | AB_2200505 | polyclonal | - | rabbit | 0.65 | Wb, IP, IF |
Proteintech | 80001-1-RR** | 23000002 | AB_2882933 | recombinant-mono | 11N20 | rabbit | 0.25 | Wb |
Proteintech | 80002-1-RR** | 23000003 | AB_2882934 | recombinant-mono | 16A22 | rabbit | 0.25 | IF |
Bio-Techne | MAB7778* | CHGW0121061 | AB_29205731 | monoclonal | 671834 | mouse | 0.50 | Wb |
Bio-Techne | NBP1-92695* | 122117 | AB_11005586 | monoclonal | 3H8 | mouse | 1.00 | Wb, IF |
Thermo Fisher Scientific | 711051** | 2352341 | AB_2633110 | recombinant-poly | 1HCLC | rabbit | 0.50 | Wb, IP, IF |
Thermo Fisher Scientific | MA5-27828* | XB3501489 | AB_2735390 | monoclonal | GT733 | mouse | 1.00 | Wb, IF |
Thermo Fisher Scientific | MA5-32627** | XB3501035 | AB_2809904 | recombinant-mono | JM51-10 | rabbit | 1.00 | Wb, IP, IF |
ABclonal | A19123** | 4000000492 | AB_2862616 | recombinant-mono | ARC0492 | rabbit | 0.93 | Wb, IF |
Cell Signaling Technology | 89789** | 1 | AB_2800143 | recombinant-mono | D9R3L | rabbit | 0.003 | Wb, IF |
Cell Signaling Technology | 89718** | 1 | AB_29205721 | recombinant-mono | E2G6G | rabbit | 0.014 | Wb |
GeneTex | GTX630196* | 41505 | AB_2888198 | monoclonal | GT225 | mouse | 1.00 | Wb, IF |
GeneTex | GTX630197* | 41505 | AB_2888199 | monoclonal | GT733 | mouse | 1.00 | Wb, IF |
Abcam | ab109535** | GR3324454-4 | AB_10859634 | recombinant-mono | EPR5810 | rabbit | 0.03 | Wb, IF-Methanol |
Abcam | ab133547** | GR3345629-4 | AB_29206211 | recombinant-mono | EPR5811 | rabbit | 0.67 | Wb, IF |
Abcam | ab190963** | GR233962-6 | AB_29206221 | recombinant-mono | EPR18554 | rabbit | 0.79 | Wb, IP, IF |
Abcam | ab254166** | GR3316998-3 | AB_29206201 | recombinant-mono | DB9 | mouse | 0.47 | Wb |
Both HAP1 WT and TARDBP KO cell lines used are listed in Table 1, together with their corresponding RRID, to ensure the cell lines are cited properly.11 Cells were cultured in DMEM high glucose (GE Healthcare cat. number SH30081.01) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Wisent, cat. number 080450), 2 mM L-glutamate (Wisent, cat. number 609065), 100 IU penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Wisent cat. number 450201).
Western blots were performed as described in our standard operating procedure.12 HAP1 WT and TARDBP KO were collected in RIPA buffer (25mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 150mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number 0089901), supplemented with protease inhibitor from MilliporeSigma (cat. number P8340). Lysates were sonicated briefly and incubated for 30 min on ice. Lysates were spun at ~110,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C and equal protein aliquots of the supernatants were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot. BLUelf prestained protein ladder from GeneDireX (cat. number PM008-0500) was used.
Western blots were performed with precast midi 4-20% Tris-Glycine polyacrylamide gels from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number WXP42012BOX) and transferred on nitrocellulose membranes. Proteins on the blots were visualized with Ponceau staining which is scanned to show together with individual Western blots. Blots were blocked with 5% milk for 1 hr, and antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Wisent, cat number 800-095) in TBS with 0,1% Tween 20 (TBST) (Cell Signaling Technology, cat. number 9997). Following three washes with TBST, the peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody was incubated at a dilution of ~0.2 μg/ml in TBST with 5% milk for 1 hr at room temperature followed by three washes with TBST. Membranes were incubated with ECL (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. number 32106) prior to detection with the iBright™ CL1500 Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. number A44240).
Immunoprecipitation was performed as described in our standard operating procedure.13 Antibody-bead conjugates were prepared by adding 2 μg to 500 μl of Pierce IP Lysis Buffer from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number 87788) in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube, together with 30 μl of Dynabeads protein A- (for rabbit antibodies) or protein G- (for mouse antibodies) from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number 10002D and 10004D, respectively). Tubes were rocked for ~2 hrs at 4°C followed by two washes to remove unbound antibodies.
HAP1 WT were collected in Pierce IP buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40 and 5% glycerol) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. number 87788), supplemented with protease inhibitor (Millipore Sigma, cat. number P8340). Lysates were rocked for 30 min at 4°C and spun at 110,000× g for 15 min at 4°C. 0.5 ml aliquots at 2.0 mg/ml of lysate were incubated with an antibody-bead conjugate for ~2 hrs at 4°C. The unbound fractions were collected, and beads were subsequently washed three times with 1.0 ml of IP lysis buffer and processed for SDS-PAGE and Western blot on precast midi 4-20% Tris-Glycine polyacrylamide gels. Prot-A: HRP (MilliporeSigma, cat. number P8651) was used as a secondary detection system at a dilution of 0.4 μg/ml for an experiment where a rabbit antibody was used for both immunoprecipitation and its corresponding Western blot.
Immunofluorescence was performed as described in our standard operating procedure.9 HAP1 WT and TARDBP KO were labelled with CellTrackerTM green (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. number C2925) or CellTrackerTM deep red (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. number C34565) fluorescence dye, respectively. The nuclei were labelled with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. number D3571) fluorescent stain. WT and KO cells were plated on glass coverslips as a mosaic and incubated for 24 hrs in a cell culture incubator at 37°C, 5% CO2. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Beantown chemical, cat. number 140770-10 ml) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Wisent, cat. number 311-010-CL) for 15 min at room temperature and then washed 3 times with PBS. Cells were permeabilized in PBS with 0,1% Triton X-100 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. number BP151-500) for 10 min at room temperature and blocked with PBS with 5% BSA, 5% goat serum (Gibco, cat. no 16210-064) and 0.01% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were incubated with IF buffer (PBS, 5% BSA, 0,01% Triton X-100) containing the primary TDP-43 antibodies overnight at 4°C. Cells were then washed 3 × 10 min with IF buffer and incubated with corresponding Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated secondary antibodies in IF buffer at a dilution of 1.0 μg/ml for 1 hr at room temperature with DAPI. Cells were washed 3 × 10 min with IF buffer and once with PBS.
Images were acquired on an ImageXpress micro widefield high-content microscopy system (Molecular Devices), using a 20×/0.45 NA air objective lens and scientific CMOS camera (16-bit, 1.97 mm field of view), equipped with 395, 475, 555 and 635 nm solid state LED lights (Lumencor Aura III light engine) and bandpass emission filters (432/36 nm, 520/35 nm, 600/37 nm and 692/40 nm) to excite and capture fluorescence emission for DAPI, CellTrackerTM Green, Alexa fluor 555 and CellTrackerTM Red, respectively. Images had pixel sizes of 0.68 × 0.68 microns. Exposure time was set with maximal (relevant) pixel intensity ~80% of dynamic range and verified on multiple wells before acquisition. Since the IF staining varied depending on the primary antibody used, the exposure time was set using the most intensely stained well as reference. Frequently, the focal plane varied slightly within a single field of view. To remedy this issue, a stack of three images per channel was acquired at a z-interval of 4 microns per field and best focus projections were generated during the acquisition (MetaExpress v6.7.1, Molecular Devices). Segmentation was carried out on the projections of CellTrackerTM channels using CellPose v1.0 on green (WT) and far-red (KO) channels, using as parameters the ‘cyto’ model to detect whole cells, and using an estimated diameter tested for each cell type, between 15 and 20 microns.14 Masks were used to generate cell outlines for intensity quantification. Figures were assembled with Adobe Illustrator.
Zenodo: Antibody Characterization Report for TDP-43, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7249802. 15
Zenodo: Dataset for the TDP-43 antibody screening study, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7665963. 16
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
We would like to thank the NeuroSGC/YCharOS/EDDU collaborative group for their important contribution to the creation of an open scientific ecosystem of antibody manufacturers and knockout cell line suppliers, for the development of community-agreed protocols, and for their shared ideas, resources and collaboration. We would also like to thank the Advanced BioImaging Facility (ABIF) consortium for their image analysis pipeline development and conduction (RRID:SCR_017697). Members of each group can be found below.
NeuroSGC/YCharOS/EDDU collaborative group: Riham Ayoubi, Thomas M. Durcan, Aled M. Edwards, Carl Laflamme, Peter S. McPherson, Chetan Raina, Wolfgang Reintsch, Kathleen Southern and Donovan Worrall.
ABIF consortium: Claire M. Brown and Joel Ryan.
An earlier version of this article can be found on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7249802).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?
Yes
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Protein Aggregation, Organelle Contact
Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?
Yes
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Motor neuron disease, protein misfolding, antibody generation
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 20 Jun 23 |
||
Version 1 14 Mar 23 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)