Keywords
Self-adhering, total-etch, bonding system, resin composite, gap distance, resin-dentin interface
Self-adhering, total-etch, bonding system, resin composite, gap distance, resin-dentin interface
Adhesive dentistry has seen a paradigm shift from the invasive to be minimally invasive, due to a revolution in bonding systems. There are great demands for simplified restorative materials. A new self-adhering flowable resin composite (Vertise™ Flow Self-Adhering Flowable Composite, Kerr Dental, USA), was recently introduced onto the market. Bonding is achieved by incorporation of an acidic adhesive monomer into the flowable composites1. It is still a big challenge to seal the resin-dentin interface, due to the heterogeneous nature of dentin, the wet tubular structure, composition and surface morphology and or improperly designed adhesives2,3.
The total-etch (etch and rinse) technique is a widely accepted technique to improve bonding of dental resins2. The dentin bonding mechanism is based on the micro-mechanical interlocking of the infiltrated resin monomers into porosities created by demineralized inorganic part of dentin4. Restoration debonding may arise from gap formation at the resin-dentin interface and hence recurrent caries, discoloration and tooth pain5. Thus sufficient marginal seal should be obtained. Recently, an innovative self-adhesive and flowable resin composite was developed. These materials are claimed to eliminate the need for a separate bonding application step, thus simplifying the restorative procedure. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the sealing performance of this new material.
After attaining written informed consent from each patient to use their extracted teeth in research, sixteen sound human posterior molar teeth were extracted in a private dental clinic (Dr. Tamer Hamdy Dental Clinic), which were randomly divided into two groups (eight specimens per group). Standard-shaped class V cavities (3x3 mm, 2 mm of depth) were prepared in the teeth using a #169L carbide bur (KG Sorensen, Brazil) on the buccal surface. One group’s (Group A) cavities were filled with Te-Econom Plus® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Africa) resin composite after etching and bonding application. The etching agent, Eco-Etch gel (Ivoclar Vivadent), was applied to dentine for 15 seconds, followed by rinsing and drying. A bonding agent (Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE, USA) was applied to the teeth for 20 seconds, then air-dried for 5 seconds, then light-cured for 10 seconds. Finally, the Te-Econom Plus resin composite was applied. The other group’s (Group B) cavities were filled with self-adhering resin composite (Vertise-Flow), which was applied without etch or bond. Curing was done for 20 seconds using a light emitting diode (LED) light curing unit (Satelec, Acteon, France).
All teeth were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C. Subsequently, the specimens were vertically sectioned with a diamond saw (Isomet, Buehler Ltd., USA) under water lubrication into approximately 1mm thick slabs. These were examined for marginal gap distance in μm using scanning electron microscope (SEM; Model Quanta 250 FEG; FEI, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA): accelerating voltage 30 K.V., magnification 14x up to 1000000 and resolution for Gun.1n, to ensure high brightness and resolution at low accelerating voltage.
Specimens slab were then placed in freshly prepared 50 weight/volume % ammoniacal silver nitrate solution for an additional 24 hours at 37°C in the dark. Ammoniacal silver nitrate solution (pH=9.5) was prepared according to the protocol of Tay et al. (2002)6. After 24 hours of storage in ammoniacal silver nitrate, the silver impregnated specimens were then rinsed thoroughly in distilled water and placed in photo-developing solution for 8 hours under a fluorescent light (200 Watt)3.
The specimens were then observed under environmental SEM Model Quanta 250 FEG attached with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX; Inspect S 50, FEI, Netherlands): accelerating voltage 30 K.V., magnification 4000x and resolution for Gun.1n. Backscattered electron mode was used for elemental analysis of the atomic silver %.
Numerical data were explored for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests, followed by Student’s t-test to compare between the two groups. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM®SPSS® Version 20 for Windows (SPSS Inc., IBM Corporation, USA).
Regarding marginal gap formation, Group A showed a significantly lower mean gap distance values than Group B (p<0.001), as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Group A | Group B | P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
0.0 | 0.0 | 5.2 | 0.3 | <0.001* |
The SEM with EDX analysis results revealed that Group A showed significantly lower mean silver atomic % values than Group B (p<0.001), as shown in Table 2 A. Selected SEM/EDX analysis is shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
Group A | Group B | P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
8.2 | 0.4 | 12.2 | 0.7 | <0.001* |
A proper marginal sealing is essential to improve the durability of resin composite/bonding systems7. Most of the clinical studies assessing the performance of an adhesive system use class V cavities8. EDX analysis permits identification of silver particles, thus giving an indication about the chemical analysis of the interface9.
From the present results, it was obvious that the multi-step etch and rinse technique provides better sealing regarding marginal gap formation and penetration of silver particles than that of self-etch “Vertise-Flow”. This may be attributed to the fact that phosphoric acid included in acid-etch step demineralized the smear layer, exposing the collagen fibers of superficially demineralized dentin. These could increase micromechanical interlocking of the bonding agent within the dentin surface10. The poorer sealing of Vertise-Flow may be due to the included adhesive monomer, which is called glycerol phosphate dimethacrylate “GPDM”, that etches instead of bonds to hydroxyapatite11.
Total-etch resin composite technique was more effective regarding marginal gap formation and penetration of silver particles as compared to a flowable resin composite (Vertise-Flow). Further studies for bond strength could be performed. It is important to emphasize that this study ignored the effect of oral condition, thus further clinical studies are suggested.
Dataset 1: Raw values for silver atomic % in teeth treated with total-etch technique (Group A) and self-adhering resin composite (Group B) (n=8/group/method). doi, 10.5256/f1000research.12306.d17706112
Dataset 2: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showing gap formation (raw values included on the images) and SEM/energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) at the resin-superficial dentin interface in teeth treated with total-etch technique (Group A) and self-adhering resin composite (Group B) (n=8/group/method). doi, 10.5256/f1000research.12306.d17706213
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Dental biomaterials
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 4 (revision) 23 Oct 18 |
||
Version 3 (revision) 23 Oct 17 |
read | read |
Version 2 (revision) 17 Oct 17 |
read | |
Version 1 14 Sep 17 |
read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)