Introduction
Glutamate, the most prevalent excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system, has long been associated with the excitotoxicity of alcohol withdrawal. Repeated episodes of alcohol withdrawal can generate aberrant behaviors such as hypermotility and increased seizures, which are classically thought to be related to an excitable state caused by increased glutamate action in the brain1–4. These hyperglutamatergic periods of alcohol deprivation between heavy drinking events may be kindled across time, in a process like electrophysiological kindling5. Since this hypothesis is generally well accepted in the field, many have explored glutamatergic targets for new alcohol use disorder medications6. However, since an acute injection of ethanol also increases glutamate in the nucleus accumbens (NAc)7, a site heavily associated with both reward and stress, it suggests that there is a continuum of engagement through the transition from low to heavy drinking regulated by glutamate signaling. We focus on circuits that become recruited among subcortical structures beyond the classic mesolimbic-centric perspective.
There are distinct pharmacological classes of glutamate receptors, including ionotropic (iGluR) and metabotropic (mGluR) glutamate receptors and glutamate transporters that have been linked to a wide variety of alcohol-related phenotypes. In brief, iGluRs encompass α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors with 1–4 subunits (GluA1–4), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors with two obligatory GluN1 subunits and combinations of GluN2(A–D) assemblies, and kainite receptors (GluK1–5). GluN receptors are more sensitive to alcohol than GluA and GluK8–10. Also, allosteric modulation of the GluN2B binding site can produce changes in alcohol-related behaviors. In contrast to the ligand-gated cation-selective ion channel iGluRs, mGluRs are G-protein-coupled and form three distinct classes: group I (mGluR1 and mGluR5), group II (mGluR2 and mGluR3), and group III (mGluR4, mGluR6, mGluR7, and mGluR8). Glutamate clearance in the synapse can be controlled by reuptake through transporters like excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) and adenosine transporters (equilibrative nucleoside transporter, or ENT) into glia and vesicular glutamate transporters into neurons. This review synthesizes the extant behavioral pharmacological findings for the role of glutamate, its receptors, and its circuitry throughout the brain in several stages of the transition to alcohol use disorder. In light of clinical literature, three general phases within alcohol use disorders are discussed: low-level drinking, binge drinking, and heavy drinking with withdrawal. We highlight specific animal behavior protocols in these three categories, but importantly these methods can be applied among all phases in the development of alcohol dependence.
Low-level drinking
Ethanol consumption that causes less than 0.08 g/dL (or 80 mg/dL) blood alcohol concentrations (BACs), less than 17 mM in the brain, is considered a low dose. Typical low-alcohol doses would be equivalent to a social drinker with BACs in the range of 0.015–0.025 g/dL (15–25 mg/dL). However, a BAC of 0.04 g/dL is classified as driving under the influence (DUI) for commercial drivers or previous DUI offenders (http://www.dmv.org/). With rodents that can readily metabolize alcohol, higher gram per kilogram (g/kg) alcohol concentrations may lead to BACs under 80 mg/dL.
Acute sub-intoxication doses of alcohol ingestion in humans can cause reduced strength of evoked field potentials in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), suggesting reduced excitability and functional connections11. This is concordant with a 0.375 g/kg ethanol injection inhibiting PFC firing rate by approximately 20% versus baseline in anesthetized rats12. In general, there is a paucity of clinical data for low-level alcohol consumption and glutamate activity because low-level drinkers are compared with heavy drinkers instead of abstinent people in clinical research.
Two-bottle choice
Two-bottle choice (2BC) involves offering the option to drink either a diluted ethanol-containing solution (concentrations range from 3 to 30%) or water for a fixed amount of time (Table 1). 2BC allows for the measurement of both voluntary consumption and ethanol preference over water and can be used as a single protocol or be combined with others to generate the desired level of drinking. In other words, first-day BACs may indicate low-level drinking, but weeks of 2BC could produce intoxicating BACs. This section focuses on 2BC studies that assess baseline ethanol preference, but daily limited-access studies that generate more binge-like drinking are discussed in the next section.
Table 1. Descriptions of alcohol-related protocols.
Method | Details | Ethanol g/kg achieved | Key references |
---|
Two-bottle choice (2BC) | 3–20% ethanol given in one bottle with a secondary bottle of water usually for 24 hours | ≤10 g/kg per 24 hours (mice) | McClearn and Rodgers183; Belknap, Crabbe, and Young184 |
Operant self-administration | 9–15% ethanol (some add 2% sucrose) reinforcements are self-administered with cue for 30–60 minutes | ≤90 mg/dL BAC (rats), ≤200 mg/dL BAC (mice); ≤1.5 g/kg per 30 minutes (rats), ≤3 g/kg per 1 hour (mice) | Elmer, Meisch, and George185; Melendez et al.186; Faccidomo et al.57 |
Cue-induced or stress- induced reinstatement | 10–15% ethanol reinforcements are self- administered with cue, then extinction after cue is no longer paired with delivery of ethanol, finally reinstatement of ethanol-seeking behavior (lever pressing) occurs after ethanol-related cue or stressor is given | ≤90 mg/dL BAC (rats), ≤200 mg/dL BAC (mice); ≤1.5 g/kg per 30 minutes (rats), ≤3 g/kg per 1 hour (mice) | Lê et al.187; Chaudhri et al.188; Shaham et al.46 |
Alcohol discrimination | Sucrose or food pellet reinforcement given upon pressing the correct response lever after ethanol or vehicle injection; test sessions involve injecting a novel drug and measuring lever selection | 0.5–2 g/kg injection, intraperitoneally or per os | Grant64; Kostowski and Bienkowski65 |
Drinking in the dark | 3 hours into the dark photoperiod, one bottle of 20% ethanol is given for 2–4 hours (mice) | ≤3 g/kg per 2 hours; ≤7 g/kg per 4 hours (mice) | Rhodes et al.90; Thiele, Crabbe, Boehm91 |
Scheduled high alcohol consumption | Water restriction for all but 90 minutes–10 hours, and every 3rd/4th day 5, 7, or 10% ethanol is substituted for 10–30 minutes followed by water | ≤2 g/kg per 30 minutes; ≤100 mg/dL BAC (mice) | Finn et al.104; Tanchuk et al.44 |
Multiple scheduled access | Four 1-hour access periods to 15% and 30% ethanol separated by 2 hours starting 1 hour into dark cycle, 5 consecutive days/week | ≤2 g/kg per 1 hour; ≤130 mg/dL BAC (rats) | Murphy et al.106; Bell et al.107; McBride et al.109 |
Alcohol deprivation effect | 5–20% ethanol given every day for 6–8 weeks with a 3- to 6-day deprivation then resumption of drinking | Additional 2 g/kg per 24 hours over baseline (rats); additional 4 g/kg per 24 hours over baseline (mice) | Sinclair et al.189; Spanagel et al.112; Melendez et al.190 |
Intermittent access to alcohol | Every other day, 2BC of 20% ethanol and water is given for 24 hours, repeated for 4+ weeks | ≤250 mg/dL BAC (rats), ≤200 mg/dL BAC (mice); ≤10 g/kg per 24 hours (rats); ≤25 g/kg per 24 hours (mice) | Wise131; Simms et al.132; Hwa et al.135; Carnicella, Ron, and Barak133 |
Chronic intermittent ethanol vapor | 14-hour ethanol vapor and 10-hour air (rats) or 16-hour/8-hour (mice), repeated for 4+ weeks | 150–250 mg/dL BAC during exposure; post-exposure, 6 g/kg per 24 hours (rats); ≤4 g/kg per 2 hours (mice) | Goldstein et al.191; O’Dell et al.192; Lopez and Becker193 |
The studies are unequivocal that NMDA and AMPA regulate 2BC drinking, and both competitive and non-competitive GluN antagonists reduce 2BC intake13–15. For example, NMDA and AMPA infused into the lateral hypothalamus can both increase 2BC consumption14. However, GluN antagonists and glycine B site blockade can importantly reduce motor coordination to achieve these effects13–16. Similarly, GluN2A knockout mice show alcohol-induced impairments in motor coordination from wild-types (WTs) but do not show differences in consumption17. Other glutamate-related knockout lines also do not differ in 2BC drinking compared with WTs (for example, AMPA GluR1, GluN1 glycine, and mGluR5)18–21. Pharmacological manipulations of mGluRs, specifically mGluR5 antagonists and mGluR7 agonists, are effective at reducing 2BC intake in rats22–24. In complementary experiments, blockade with mGluR7 antagonist MMPIP or shRNA in the NAc can increase low-dose alcohol intake and preference24,25. Since Homer2 knockout mice drink less than WTs in 2BC26, it suggests that downstream signaling molecules are also important beyond glutamate receptor binding and clearance. It is worth mentioning that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication for alcohol dependence, acamprosate, for which the glutamatergic mechanism of action is controversial, reduces 2BC drinking in rats27. There is a glaring gap in the literature for which glutamatergic circuits in the brain may govern low-dose ethanol drinking. We need this critical information for insight into higher-dose plasticity.
Another important variable on the outcome of 2BC drinking and potential neuroadaptations is strain. Classic comparisons contrast between drinking behavior of C57BL/6J mice and DBA/2J mice, yet many inbred strains have been assessed for 2BC28. Although specific sucrose-fading procedures can be used to induce ethanol drinking in DBA/2J mice (for example, 29) or bypassing ethanol taste altogether (for example, 30), this mouse strain drinks much less than C57BL/6J mice. 2BC preference may be related to strain differences in the effect of glutamate and NMDA on the brain in vitro31,32 and differences in gene expression in response to acute ethanol33. Also, alcohol-preferring (P) rats, genetically selected for high alcohol drinking, have a loss of the mGluR2 receptors that may contribute to escalated alcohol intake34. Comparing high-drinking and low-drinking strains caused from trait selection or from inbred lines would increase the understanding of how glutamate-related genes influence drinking behavior.
Operant self-administration of alcohol
Operant self-administration is a powerful method for mice, rats, and monkeys to assess ethanol reinforcement. Via these methods, rodents will typically self-administer amounts ranging from 0.5 to 2 g/kg depending on factors such as session length, reinforcement schedule, and alcohol concentration by pressing a lever, spinning a wheel, or poking the nose into a receptacle (Table 1). Uncompetitive GluN antagonists ketamine and memantine reduce operant responding for ethanol with mechanistic target of rapamycin signaling, likely regulating the anti-alcohol effects of ketamine35. Both mGluR5 and mGluR1 blockade and mGluR7-positive allosteric modulation decrease alcohol self-administration in rats and mice36–40, particularly in the NAc41,42. As in 2BC studies, some have seen ethanol-induced sedation and hypnosis with mGluR5 antagonist MPEP and mGluR2/3 antagonist LY34149543 and non-specific reductions in sucrose self-administration39,44. This may be due in part to mGluR5 influencing D1 receptors in seeking behavior45.
Self-administration training techniques are also useful to investigate cue-induced reinstatement, or seeking behavior, following extinction of the alcohol-paired cues (Table 1). In operant self-administration protocols, cue-induced reinstatement or stress-induced reinstatement of alcohol seeking after a period of extinction training is also interpreted to be a form of relapse46 (Table 1). We discuss the literature here instead of the relapse section, as no alcohol is consumed during reinstatement tests. There have been mixed reports for the ability of competitive GluN antagonists to affect reinstatement47,48. For mGluRs, it is not surprising that mGluR5 antagonism and mGluR2/3 agonism reduce cue-induced reinstatement, alcohol seeking in Pavlovian spontaneous recovery, and enhanced sensitivity to the attenuation of conditioned reinstatement49–52, but there are varying reports for whether these compounds affect baseline self-administration. Gass et al.53 found evidence for increased glutamate transmission from the basolateral amygdala (BLA) to NAc core during cue-induced reinstatement of alcohol seeking. Glutamate transmission and transport may be mediated through adenosine ENT154 since N-acetylcysteine and ceftriaxone, which alter glial reuptake and release of glutamate, also alter alcohol self-administration55. Downstream signaling molecules such as PKCε, ERK, and CaMKII/AMPA in the PFC and amygdala have been well established in alcohol self-administration and cue-induced reinstatement56–59. Specifically, amygdalar CaMKII/AMPA activation promotes self-administration and drinking60–62, whereas inhibition of CaMKII in the PFC increases the positive reinforcing effects of alcohol63. Others have explored the activation of mGluR2 amygdala to hippocampus pathway in cue-induced alcohol seeking, where mGluR-mediated synaptic depression is impaired in the hippocampus34. It seems that subregions of the amygdala and also the PFC are recruited during this low-level drinking.
Alcohol-discriminative stimulus effects
Alcohol discrimination tasks are useful to assess the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the discriminative stimulus effects (for example, interoceptive effects) of low and high alcohol doses (Table 1). However, it is important to note that these tasks do not involve alcohol drinking but rather experimenter-administered alcohol. We have known for decades that the discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol are mediated by GluNs and GABAA64–66. Specifically, lower alcohol doses (for example, 0.5–1 g/kg) engage GABA receptor systems whereas higher doses (>2 g/kg) involve NMDA receptor systems. Rats and cynomolgus monkeys can discriminate alcohol from glutamate release inhibitors and NMDA ligands, showing that they have partial alcohol-like effects67,68. This is different from the discrimination of acamprosate, where acamprosate fails to substitute for an alcohol cue, suggesting that it is not a substitution drug69. Besheer et al. have shown that alcohol discrimination is co-regulated by mGluR5 in the NAc and the mGluR2/3 in the amygdala70–73 and that inhibition of MEK/ERK(1/2) in the amygdala, but not NAc, potentiates the effects of a low alcohol dose74. Recent work with stress hormone corticosterone links both mGluR5 and mGluR2/3 in the sensitivity to alcohol75,76, suggesting a role for neuropeptide modulation of glutamatergic circuits. Furthermore, in addition to the NAc, a functional role for the medial PFC (mPFC) in modulating sensitivity to low alcohol doses has been shown66,77. An interesting contribution from the Holmes lab shows that GluN2B in corticostriatal circuits governs choice learning and choice shifting78. Although this learning is not in the presence of alcohol, they show a dissociation between OFC GluN2B in choice shifting and dorsal striatum GluN2B in choice learning. These findings suggest it is possible that learning about alcohol through discrimination tasks recruits distinct populations of both iGluR and mGluR in subcortical sites, although more research is required to confirm how this contrasts from habitual learning in the striatum.
Overall, there is ample evidence demonstrating PFC plasticity in alcohol-seeking behavior and low-dose alcohol drinking at a stage engaging positive reinforcement and the euphoric effects of the drug. Although 2BC studies have tested several facets of the glutamate system using knockout mice, there is a gap of knowledge in iGluRs in alcohol self-administration studies. This may be confounded by the fact that competitive GluRN antagonists mimic the interoceptive properties of alcohol. More recent studies have implicated GluRA in the rostromedial tegmental nucleus in alcohol seeking79. Another behavioral outcome of low-dose acute, self-administered alcohol (1 g/kg) is an increase in inter-male aggression in a subset of mice80. Memantine, neramexane, and mGluR5 antagonist MTEP interacted with alcohol to further increase alcohol-heightened aggression in mice, whereas mGluR2/3 agonist LY379268 did not81. CRF type-1 receptors regulate serotonin function from the dorsal raphe nuclei (DRN)- mPFC to alter alcohol-heightened aggression82, so glutamate may influence the mPFC for the expression of low-dose alcohol-related behavior.
Episodic drinking through binges and relapse
Binge drinking, defined as BACs greater than 0.08 g/dL or 80 mg/dL within 2 hours, is common among most strata of US adults and leads to an increased susceptibility for developing chronic alcoholism83,84. This section focuses on hazardous, episodic, binge drinking. However, epidemiological reports have found that there are almost as many binge-drinking episodes among moderate drinkers as among heavy drinkers in the US83, so binge and relapse behavior represents the hazardous transition between moderate and heavy drinking. We focus on changes in glutamate plasticity to inform us on dramatic neurobiological events across species.
Binge alcohol drinkers have increased glutamate-to-creatine ratios and lower GABA concentrations in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) than do low alcohol drinkers85,86 presumably with glutamatergic perturbations. Repeated 2–3.4 g/kg alcohol injections increase accumbal and hippocampal glutamate compared with water-injected animals1,87,88. This confirms a study in which young adults with depression had a positive correlation between the level of alcohol use and glutamate in the hippocampus89.
Drinking in the dark
The prototypical procedure in mice to induce binge-like drinking is giving one bottle of alcohol, offered 3 hours into the active dark photoperiod for 2–4 hours, termed drinking in the dark (DID) (Table 1)90,91. C57BL/6J mice typically drink 2–5 g/kg in a session. Even two alcohol “binges” in adolescent rats are sufficient to abolish long-term synaptic depression in hippocampal slices and to evoke cognitive deficits via a short-lasting, repeated blockade of GluN, inducing a change in the receptor subunit composition92. An earlier DID study showed that both acamprosate and MPEP decreased DID intake without affecting sugar or water drinking93. Others have gone on to show that mGluR5 signaling affects PKCε in the NAc or central amgydala (CeA) to regulate DID94,95. Specifically, repeated DID for 30 days elevates CeA levels of glutamate-associated proteins of Homer2a/b, mGluR1a, GluN2B, and PLCε 24 hours after withdrawal from binge drinking95. Intra-CeA and intra-NAc mGluR1 negative allosteric modulator JNJ-16259685 also reduces DID intake96,97. More recent studies have isolated downstream factors after DID such as mGluRs affecting AMPA receptor trafficking proteins like eukaryotic elongation factor 2 or decreased amygdalar CaMKIIαT286 phosphorylation98,99. Importantly, this effect was isolated to the amygdala but not NAc or dorsal striatum. This may be related to the lack of difference in frequency and amplitude of spontaneous excitatory post-synaptic current (sEPSC) in dorsolateral striatum and dorsomedial striatum medium spiny neurons between 6 weeks’ DID and water-drinking mice100. Also, moving away from the classic mesolimbic pathway, others have identified a novel ventral tegmental area (VTA)–bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) CRF circuit in DID101. CRF-R1 antagonists can reduce DID through intact CRF-R2 signaling, and inhibiting VTA-projecting BNST CRF neurons reduces DID101. Repeated 2 g/kg alcohol injections result in enhanced GluN-mediated LTP in VTA dopamine neurons102, so it is likely that this VTA-BNST glutamate pathway is altered during binge drinking in DID in a similar fashion.
Beyond DID, there are other daily limited-access procedures that lead to binge drinking in rodents. Permutations of DID exist, such as 2-hour daily access for 14 days in C57BL/6J mice, to study other facets of binge-like drinking, such as tolerance103. The scheduled high alcohol consumption (SHAC) protocol involves water restriction for all but 90 minutes of water access, and every fourth day alcohol replaces water for 10–30 minutes104. Systemic administration of mGluR5 antagonist MPEP decreases SHAC intake but also sucrose self-administration44. Further studies have found a role for mGluR5-Homer2-PI3K signaling in the NAc in SHAC intake105, which can be replicated in the DID protocol94. Another limited-access protocol is multiple scheduled access (MSA), in which P rats are offered four 1-hour 2BC sessions separated by 2 hours across the dark cycle 5 days per week106. Changes in gene expression in the NAc and amygdala after weeks of MSA drinking in P rats have been extensively studied107–109, so what is needed is targeting how glutamate interacts between the sites through mGluRs and iGluRs110. MSA can lead to a transient increase in alcohol drinking after a weekend of deprivation107, an alcohol deprivation effect (ADE), so it incorporates episodic drinking in both limited-access binge drinking and relapse-like drinking.
Alcohol deprivation effect
Relapse is also episodic in nature, both in the clinic and modeled with animals. Relapse, a hallmark of alcohol use disorders, is the resumption of drinking following a prolonged period of abstinence. With animals, experimenters can model relapse through the expression of the ADE. In this method, alcohol-drinking animals are deprived of alcohol for a period of time (for example, days to weeks), and then following this deprivation period, an escalation in alcohol drinking is observed following re-exposure to alcohol (Table 1). Intra-PFC glutamate and acamprosate separately reduce the ADE111,112. However, many other glutamatergic compounds—GluN/glycine receptor antagonist L-701,324, GluN2B selective antagonist ifenprodil, GluN channel blocker neramexane, GluA/GluK antagonist CNQX, and Na+ channel blocker lamotrigine—attenuate the ADE similar to alcohol seeking during cue-induced reinstatement47,48. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports for the involvement of iGluR or mGluR circuitry in the ADE, but we hypothesize that it would be similar to plastic changes in DID or operant self-administration circuitry.
It appears that episodic drinking, the amorphous transition between low-dose and high-dose intake, engages both reward-related and stress-related glutamate brain processes. A single DID protocol is mGluR5 antagonist-responsive, whereas repeated DID for a month alters changes in downstream glutamate proteins. Multiple glutamatergic compounds reduce the ADE and cue-induced reinstatement, so perhaps these protocols in combination with others would be more apt for screening medications for the clinic.
Heavy drinking and withdrawal
Heavy drinking is defined as consuming five or more drinks on the same occasion on each of five or more days in the past month113. People who exhibit heavy drinking may or may not fall into the category of mild, moderate, or severe alcohol use disorder on the basis of the accompanying psychological symptoms114. As mentioned earlier, heavy drinking can be different across species. Most clinical literature focuses on alcoholics, whereas rodent studies do not have the commodity of an overarching term. For example, heavy drinking in outbred rats can be 6 g/kg per day, whereas in mice it may be 15 g/kg per day. The subsequent analysis considers heavy drinking and withdrawal for the particular species.
Tsai et al.115 originally reported that alcohol-dependent patients have increased glutamate and glycine in the cerebrospinal fluid during withdrawal, with accompanying reduced GABA concentrations. With proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, increased glutamate levels have been associated with more years spent drinking, loss-of-control alcohol use, and craving during detoxification in heavy drinkers or non-treatment-seeking alcoholics116–118. This glutamate dysfunction is localized to the NAc and the ACC with a positive correlation between craving and glutamate and glutamine in these regions118,119. GluN compounds like ketamine, memantine, and d-cycloserine mimic the subjective effects of alcohol in recovering alcoholics120–122. However, it is unfortunate that clinical trials with memantine or FDA-approved acamprosate did not prevent relapse compared with placebo in alcohol-dependent patients in large-scale double-blind experiments123–127. In a massive genetics study, Schumann et al.128 reported that genetic variations in GluN2A have the greatest relevance for human alcohol dependence among 10 glutamatergic probe genes, yet increased GluN2B expression and GluN2C in the ACC and dorsolateral PFC during withdrawal can indicate likelihood of alcohol craving and risk for relapse129,130. It appears that the ACC is a distinct site for glutamate plasticity in heavy drinking.
Intermittent access to alcohol
Cycles of binging and withdrawal occur in the transition to developing an alcohol use disorder. We can model voluntary alcohol drinking in between periods of abstinence, or alcohol deprivation, with 24-hour intermittent access to 2BC alcohol131–133. Weeks of intermittent alcohol access can lead to drinking despite adverse consequences134 and signs of withdrawal such as handling-induced convulsions and decreased social interactions135,136. Giving access to alcohol for a 24-hour period may cause variability in when animals choose to drink, so researchers can also measure fluid consumption during the initial 2-, 4-, and/or 6-hour access within the 24-hour period. With this, front-loading behavior may be observed accompanied by high BACs after 2-hour access (Table 1)135. Additionally, smaller segments within 24-hour access allow drug manipulations to be assessed137,138.
Acamprosate reduces intermittent alcohol drinking in rats but not continuous-access alcohol drinking132. Confirming clinical reports, outbred mice drinking on intermittent access to alcohol for 8 weeks show increased extracellular glutamate in the mPFC during withdrawal compared with 1 week of drinking and compared with water drinkers136. Early reports with intermittent-access drinking in rats, drinking 7 g/kg per day, have enhanced post-synaptic GluA function in VTA neurons in the absence of any change in pre-synaptic glutamate release139. Similarly, glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic transmission are altered in the striatum of non-human primates with extended access for 3 years140. Six months of continuous access and intermittent access to alcohol consumption in P rats produce selective increases in group 1 mGluR/Homer2/GluN2 expression within the NAc core and CeA141,142. Intermittent alcohol can produce short-term increases in Homer/glutamate receptor expression within both the NAc core and the CeA, which may increase the aversion of early alcohol withdrawal and consequently augment the negative reinforcing properties of alcohol. Modulators of the glutamate transporters reduce heavy drinking on a continuous-access schedule (15% and 30% ethanol) in P rats and the increased extracellular glutamate compared with water drinkers143. These P rats also have enhanced expression of glutamate transporters EAAT2/GLT1 and xCT in the NAc and PFC, suggesting a role for targeting glutamate uptake in heavy drinking144. Long-term intermittent alcohol recruits GABA and CRF neurons in the mPFC during withdrawal and disconnects the PFC–CeA pathway, suggesting that dysregulation of mPFC interneurons may be an early index of glutamate/GABA neuroadaptation in alcohol dependence145. Impaired executive control over motivated behavior accompanies negative reinforcement during withdrawal. Seif et al.146 show that cortical activation of NAc hyperpolarization-active GluN mediates aversion-resistant intermittent alcohol intake. Both the mPFC to NAc core and insula to NAc core mediate both quinine- and footshock-resistant alcohol drinking on an intermittent-access schedule. It appears that corticolimbic sites are integral to glutamate plasticity caused by chronic intermittent drinking.
Withdrawal from chronic intermittent ethanol vapor and other forced alcohol methods
There are several other protocols that forcibly induce a post-dependent state in animals, such as repeated high-dose alcohol injections, alcohol liquid diet, and chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) vapor exposure (Table 1). Studies on brain glutamate during alcohol withdrawal have been most extensively explored using these methods, since they surpass the aversive taste of alcohol drinking solutions to induce heavy BACs. However, it is important to note that CIE is used to render rodents ethanol-dependent to subsequently increase voluntary ethanol intake, not only to maintain high BACs147–149. Microdialysis studies have shown increased glutamate in the striatum150, NAc87,151–153, and hippocampus1,154 during withdrawal in alcohol-exposed rats and mice. These results are similar to 5 g/kg alcohol gavage injections for 2–4 weeks causing increased glutamate in striatum, hippocampus, and substantia nigra 8–12 hours after the last ingestion155. To counteract excitotoxicity, acamprosate and GluN antagonists have been used to decrease alcohol drinking and to alleviate symptoms of alcohol withdrawal, including increased glutamate tone and convulsive events112,151,156–158. It is important to note that pharmacologically increasing glutamate transmission in the NAc with TBOA, a glutamate reuptake inhibitor, can increase drinking in both non-dependent and CIE-dependent mice153. Alternatively, decreasing glutamate transmission in the NAc by activating group II mGluRs reduces drinking, although the effect was stronger in dependent mice. These results comparing glutamate in non-dependent and dependent animals have similar directionality with different magnitudes, so there may be separate but overlapping actions in the NAc for treating drinking versus withdrawal symptoms with glutamatergic compounds.
In accordance with clinical studies, the PFC is a large target of glutamate plasticity in alcohol dependence. CIE results in increased GluN-mediated activity in the mPFC and increased GluN1 and GluN2B subunit expression159,160. Mice that show “compulsive-like” behaviors after CIE exhibit increased NMDA currents in the orbitofrontal cortex compared with air-exposed controls160. Rescue of infralimbic PFC mGluR2 deficit restores control over alcohol-seeking behavior161. It appears that mGluR2 and mGluR5 can target symptoms of withdrawal (but see162). Acamprosate improved attention set-shifting of alcohol-exposed animals but did not alter the concurrent changes in synaptic transmission or membrane excitability of mPFC neurons, indicating that the changes are not the pharmacological targets of acamprosate in the recovery of mPFC functions163. Abulseoud et al.164 showed that attenuation of alcohol withdrawal by ceftriaxone induced upregulation of glutamate transporter EAAT2. Reduction of EAAT2 likely contributes to a hyperglutamatergic state in the ENT1 knockout mice54,165,166. Some have suggested that increasing glutamate uptake through transporters has a potential therapeutic role in the treatment of alcohol dependence167 (but see168). Aberrations in PFC function entangle reduced executive control and poor decision making in alcoholics169.
The extended amygdala—composed of the BNST, BLA, and CeA—is particularly vulnerable to glutamate plasticity caused by CIE treatment. Chronic alcohol exposure produces neuroadaptations in glutamatergic transmission in the CeA170,171, and GluN2B-containing GluNs are most sensitive to CIE170,172,173. CIE, but not continuous vapor exposure, increases BNST GluN-mediated EPSCs, not from altered glutamate release but from an increase in GluN2-containing GluN174, suggesting that repeated cycles of exposure and withdrawal are necessary for these adaptations to occur. CIE enhances long-term potentiation formation in the BNST in GluN2B knockout mice through extrasynaptic GluN175. Stress-induced alterations in anxiety-like behavior were absent following bilateral infusion of GluK1 agonist ATPA into the BLA, which augmented BLA GABAergic neurotransmission, and stress increased the amplitude of sEPSC and miniature inhibitory post-synaptic current176. A regulatory stress neuropeptide could be nociceptin, since nociceptin application decreases glutamate transmission and blocks alcohol-induced effects in the CeA of naïve and CIE rats, but nociceptin antagonist revealed tonic inhibitory activity of nociceptin on evoked CeA glutamatergic transmission only in alcohol-dependent rats177. Changes in the extended amygdala indicate a transition from positive reinforcement to negative reinforcement as stress neuropeptides like nociceptin, CRF, and dynorphin are more engaged178.
Together, chronic forced or voluntary access to alcohol affects glutamate in multiple subcortical sites like the PFC and extended amygdala, and this agrees with the clinical literature. In addition to these sites, many others have examined the hippocampus as a crux of CIE-induced glutamatergic changes. Group I mGluRs and GluN2B-containing GluNs in CA1 and cortex impair LTD, reduce spine density, and disrupt learning179,180 (but see 138). This may be related to the enhanced stress systems recruited during repeated exposure to and withdrawal from alcohol. In line with this hypothesis, corticohippocampal GluN2B is engaged during repeated swim stress181. This circuitry is also recruited in other addictive disorders. Glutamate homeostasis is a mediator of long-term drug-seeking behavior, especially through disruptions of the cysteine/glutamate exchanger and EAAT2/GLT1182. Alterations in glutamate transmission after chronic alcohol exposure and withdrawal are evident, but some effects are also likely to be unique to withdrawal alone. Future research can tease apart these dynamic distinctions or suggest that they are interconnected.
Discussion
Across all phases of alcohol drinking, glutamate is a critical regulator of subcortical plasticity in the brain. We have mapped some relevant regions of interest according to their involvement in low, moderate, or heavy drinking (Figure 1), but more work can be done to study how these sites work on a circuit level. Downstream signaling factors like CaMKII are important in the PFC and amygdala in operant self-administration. Binge drinking in the DID protocol also affects mGluR5 in the CeA and CRF in the BNST in connection with mesolimbic targets. Glutamate in the ACC and PFC is heavily disrupted in alcoholics, which is supported by preclinical research using intermittent access to alcohol or CIE. Electrophysiological studies also reveal a role for GluN2 in the extended amygdala in alcohol withdrawal, related to negative affect. Furthermore, glutamate transmission in circuits stemming from the NAc represents an overlap in circuitry from light to episodic to heavy drinking in a limited-access model. The roles of glutamate transporters and the interaction with glia are better understood at both ends of the drinking spectrum (2BC and CIE), but more can be learned through intermediate protocols that reveal the transition to heavy drinking. Overall, there appears to be a shift from mGluR-dependent behaviors to GluN-related processes transitioning from lower-level alcohol drinking to heavy alcohol drinking. The efficacy of acamprosate in animal models of drinking is high, in sharp contrast to its ineffective treatment in the clinic. Therefore, research needs to focus on other promising glutamatergic compounds to reduce heavy drinking or mediate withdrawal symptoms or both.
Figure 1. A sagittal representation of subcortical structures and their circuitry related to different stages during the transition from low-level drinking to heavy alcohol use.
Regions of interest in red indicate involvement in heavy drinking, yellow in episodic drinking, and green in lower-level drinking. Known connections start with the black circle and finish with the black arrowhead. Animal drinking protocols are depicted in blue italics. ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; BLA, basolateral amygdala; BNST, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; CeA, central amygdala; HIPP, hippocampus; NAc, nucleus accumbens; PFC, prefrontal cortex; VTA, ventral tegmental area.
Author contributions
LSH conceptualized the review, wrote the first draft of the manuscript, edited the writing, and agreed to the final content. TLK conceptualized the review, edited the writing, and agreed to the final content. JB edited the writing and agreed to the final content.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Grant information
This work was funded in part by National Institutes of Health grants R01AA025582 (to TLK and JB), R01AA019454 and U01AA017668 (to TLK), and R01AA019682 (to JB) and the NARSAD Independent Award (to TLK) and T32AA007573 (to LSH).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Faculty Opinions recommendedReferences
- 1.
Chefer V, Meis J, Wang G, et al.:
Repeated exposure to moderate doses of ethanol augments hippocampal glutamate neurotransmission by increasing release.
Addict Biol.
2011; 16(2): 229–37. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 2.
Rossetti ZL, Carboni S, Fadda F:
Glutamate-induced increase of extracellular glutamate through N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in ethanol withdrawal.
Neuroscience.
1999; 93(3): 1135–40. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 3.
Poldrugo F, Snead OC 3rd:
Electroencephalographic and behavioral correlates in rats during repeated ethanol withdrawal syndromes.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
1984; 83(2): 140–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 4.
Becker HC, Hale RL:
Repeated episodes of ethanol withdrawal potentiate the severity of subsequent withdrawal seizures: an animal model of alcohol withdrawal "kindling".
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
1993; 17(1): 94–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 5.
Ballenger JC, Post RM:
Kindling as a model for alcohol withdrawal syndromes.
Br J Psychiatry.
1978; 133(1): 1–14. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 6.
Holmes A, Spanagel R, Krystal JH:
Glutamatergic targets for new alcohol medications.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2013; 229(3): 539–54. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 7.
Selim M, Bradberry CW:
Effect of ethanol on extracellular 5-HT and glutamate in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex: comparison between the Lewis and Fischer 344 rat strains.
Brain Res.
1996; 716(1–2): 157–64. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 8.
Allgaier C:
Ethanol sensitivity of NMDA receptors.
Neurochem Int.
2002; 41(6): 377–82. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 9.
Lovinger DM, White G, Weight FF:
Ethanol inhibits NMDA-activated ion current in hippocampal neurons.
Science.
1989; 243(4899): 1721–4. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 10.
Mirshahi T, Woodward JJ:
Ethanol sensitivity of heteromeric NMDA receptors: effects of subunit assembly, glycine and NMDAR1 Mg2+-insensitive mutants.
Neuropharmacology.
1995; 34(3): 347–55. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 11.
Kähkönen S, Wilenius J, Nikulin VV, et al.:
Alcohol reduces prefrontal cortical excitability in humans: a combined TMS and EEG study.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2003; 28(4): 747–54. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 12.
Tu Y, Kroener S, Abernathy K, et al.:
Ethanol inhibits persistent activity in prefrontal cortical neurons.
J Neurosci.
2007; 27(17): 4765–75. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 13.
McMillen BA, Joyner PW, Parmar CA, et al.:
Effects of NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist drugs on the volitional consumption of ethanol by a genetic drinking rat.
Brain Res Bull.
2004; 64(3): 279–84. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 14.
Chen YW, Barson JR, Chen A, et al.:
Glutamatergic input to the lateral hypothalamus stimulates ethanol intake: role of orexin and melanin-concentrating hormone.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2013; 37(1): 123–31. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 15.
Lockridge A, Romero G, Harrington J, et al.:
Timing-dependent reduction in ethanol sedation and drinking preference by NMDA receptor co-agonist d-serine.
Alcohol.
2012; 46(4): 389–400. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 16.
Debrouse L, Hurd B, Kiselycznyk C, et al.:
Probing the modulation of acute ethanol intoxication by pharmacological manipulation of the NMDAR glycine co-agonist site.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2013; 37(2): 223–33. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 17.
Boyce-Rustay JM, Holmes A:
Ethanol-related behaviors in mice lacking the NMDA receptor NR2A subunit.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2006; 187(4): 455–66. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 18.
Cowen MS, Schroff KC, Gass P, et al.:
Neurobehavioral effects of alcohol in AMPA receptor subunit (GluR1) deficient mice.
Neuropharmacology.
2003; 45(3): 325–33. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 19.
Kiefer F, Jahn H, Koester A, et al.:
Involvement of NMDA receptors in alcohol-mediated behavior: mice with reduced affinity of the NMDA R1 glycine binding site display an attenuated sensitivity to ethanol.
Biol Psychiatry.
2003; 53(4): 345–51. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 20.
Blednov YA, Harris RA:
Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) regulation of ethanol sedation, dependence and consumption: relationship to acamprosate actions.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol.
2008; 11(6): 775–93. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 21.
Bird MK, Kirchhoff J, Djouma E, et al.:
Metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors regulate sensitivity to ethanol in mice.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol.
2008; 11(6): 765–74. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 22.
McMillen BA, Crawford MS, Kulers CM, et al.:
Effects of a metabotropic, mglu5, glutamate receptor antagonist on ethanol consumption by genetic drinking rats.
Alcohol Alcohol.
2005; 40(6): 494–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 23.
Cowen MS, Djouma E, Lawrence AJ:
The metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor antagonist 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]-pyridine reduces ethanol self-administration in multiple strains of alcohol-preferring rats and regulates olfactory glutamatergic systems.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther.
2005; 315(2): 590–600. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 24.
Bahi A, Fizia K, Dietz M, et al.:
Pharmacological modulation of mGluR7 with AMN082 and MMPIP exerts specific influences on alcohol consumption and preference in rats.
Addict Biol.
2012; 17(2): 235–47. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 25.
Bahi A:
Viral-mediated knockdown of mGluR7 in the nucleus accumbens mediates excessive alcohol drinking and increased ethanol-elicited conditioned place preference in rats.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2013; 38(11): 2109–19. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 26.
Szumlinski KK, Lominac KD, Oleson EB, et al.:
Homer2 is necessary for EtOH-induced neuroplasticity.
J Neurosci.
2005; 25(30): 7054–61. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 27.
Boismare F, Daoust M, Moore N, et al.:
A homotaurine derivative reduces the voluntary intake of ethanol by rats: are cerebral GABA receptors involved?
Pharmacol Biochem Behav.
1984; 21(5): 787–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 28.
Yoneyama N, Crabbe JC, Ford MM, et al.:
Voluntary ethanol consumption in 22 inbred mouse strains.
Alcohol.
2008; 42(3): 149–60. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 29.
McCool BA, Chappell AM:
Persistent enhancement of ethanol drinking following a monosodium glutamate-substitution procedure in C57BL6/J and DBA/2J mice.
Alcohol.
2014; 48(1): 55–61. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 30.
Fidler TL, Dion AM, Powers MS, et al.:
Intragastric self-infusion of ethanol in high- and low-drinking mouse genotypes after passive ethanol exposure.
Genes Brain Behav.
2011; 10(3): 264–75. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 31.
Wang Z, Chow SY:
Effects of glutamate, N-methyl-D-aspartate, high potassium, and hypoxia on unit discharges in CA1 area of hippocampal slices of DBA and C57 mice.
Epilepsia.
1995; 36(2): 196–206. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 32.
Wanat MJ, Sparta DR, Hopf FW, et al.:
Strain specific synaptic modifications on ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons after ethanol exposure.
Biol Psychiatry.
2009; 65(8): 646–53. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 33.
Kerns RT, Ravindranathan A, Hassan S, et al.:
Ethanol-responsive brain region expression networks: implications for behavioral responses to acute ethanol in DBA/2J versus C57BL/6J mice.
J Neurosci.
2005; 25(9): 2255–66. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 34.
Zhou Z, Karlsson C, Liang T, et al.:
Loss of metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 escalates alcohol consumption.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2013; 110(42): 16963–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 35.
Sabino V, Narayan AR, Zeric T, et al.:
mTOR activation is required for the anti-alcohol effect of ketamine, but not memantine, in alcohol-preferring rats.
Behav Brain Res.
2013; 247: 9–16. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 36.
Hodge CW, Miles MF, Sharko AC, et al.:
The mGluR5 antagonist MPEP selectively inhibits the onset and maintenance of ethanol self-administration in C57BL/6J mice.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2006; 183(4): 429–38. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 37.
Schroeder JP, Overstreet DH, Hodge CW:
The mGluR5 antagonist MPEP decreases operant ethanol self-administration during maintenance and after repeated alcohol deprivations in alcohol-preferring (P) rats.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2005; 179(1): 262–70. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 38.
Cowen MS, Krstew E, Lawrence AJ:
Assessing appetitive and consummatory phases of ethanol self-administration in C57BL/6J mice under operant conditions: regulation by mGlu5 receptor antagonism.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2007; 190(1): 21–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 39.
Salling MC, Faccidomo S, Hodge CW:
Nonselective suppression of operant ethanol and sucrose self-administration by the mGluR7 positive allosteric modulator AMN082.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav.
2008; 91(1): 14–20. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 40.
Adams CL, Cowen MS, Short JL, et al.:
Combined antagonism of glutamate mGlu5 and adenosine A2A receptors interact to regulate alcohol-seeking in rats.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol.
2008; 11(2): 229–41. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 41.
Besheer J, Faccidomo S, Grondin JJ, et al.:
Regulation of motivation to self-administer ethanol by mGluR5 in alcohol-preferring (P) rats.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2008; 32(2): 209–21. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 42.
Besheer J, Grondin JJ, Cannady R, et al.:
Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 activity in the nucleus accumbens is required for the maintenance of ethanol self-administration in a rat genetic model of high alcohol intake.
Biol Psychiatry.
2010; 67(9): 812–22. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 43.
Sharko AC, Hodge CW:
Differential modulation of ethanol-induced sedation and hypnosis by metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists in C57BL/6J mice.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2008; 32(1): 67–76. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 44.
Tanchuck MA, Yoneyama N, Ford MM, et al.:
Assessment of GABA-B, metabotropic glutamate, and opioid receptor involvement in an animal model of binge drinking.
Alcohol.
2011; 45(1): 33–44. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 45.
Parkitna JR, Sikora M, Gołda S, et al.:
Novelty-seeking behaviors and the escalation of alcohol drinking after abstinence in mice are controlled by metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 on neurons expressing dopamine d1 receptors.
Biol Psychiatry.
2013; 73(3): 263–70. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 46.
Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, et al.:
The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2003; 168(1–2): 3–20. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 47.
Bäckström P, Hyytiä P:
Ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists modulate cue-induced reinstatement of ethanol-seeking behavior.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2004; 28(4): 558–65. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 48.
Vengeliene V, Bachteler D, Danysz W, et al.:
The role of the NMDA receptor in alcohol relapse: a pharmacological mapping study using the alcohol deprivation effect.
Neuropharmacology.
2005; 48(6): 822–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 49.
Bäckström P, Bachteler D, Koch S, et al.:
mGluR5 antagonist MPEP reduces ethanol-seeking and relapse behavior.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2004; 29(5): 921–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 50.
Bäckström P, Hyytiä P:
Suppression of alcohol self-administration and cue-induced reinstatement of alcohol seeking by the mGlu2/3 receptor agonist LY379268 and the mGlu8 receptor agonist (S)-3,4-DCPG.
Eur J Pharmacol.
2005; 528(1–3): 110–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 51.
Rodd ZA, McKinzie DL, Bell RL, et al.:
The metabotropic glutamate 2/3 receptor agonist LY404039 reduces alcohol-seeking but not alcohol self-administration in alcohol-preferring (P) rats.
Behav Brain Res.
2006; 171(2): 207–15. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 52.
Kufahl PR, Martin-Fardon R, Weiss F:
Enhanced sensitivity to attenuation of conditioned reinstatement by the mGluR2/3 agonist LY379268 and increased functional activity of mGluR2/3 in rats with a history of ethanol dependence.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2011; 36(13): 2762–73. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 53.
Gass JT, Sinclair CM, Cleva RM, et al.:
Alcohol-seeking behavior is associated with increased glutamate transmission in basolateral amygdala and nucleus accumbens as measured by glutamate-oxidase-coated biosensors.
Addict Biol.
2011; 16(2): 215–28. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 54.
Chen J, Nam HW, Lee MR, et al.:
Altered glutamatergic neurotransmission in the striatum regulates ethanol sensitivity and intake in mice lacking ENT1.
Behav Brain Res.
2010; 208(2): 636–42. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 55.
Weiland A, Garcia S, Knackstedt LA:
Ceftriaxone and cefazolin attenuate the cue-primed reinstatement of alcohol-seeking.
Front Pharmacol.
2015; 6: 44. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 56.
Olive MF, McGeehan AJ, Kinder JR, et al.:
The mGluR5 antagonist 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridine decreases ethanol consumption via a protein kinase C epsilon-dependent mechanism.
Mol Pharmacol.
2005; 67(2): 349–55. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 57.
Faccidomo S, Besheer J, Stanford PC, et al.:
Increased operant responding for ethanol in male C57BL/6J mice: specific regulation by the ERK1/2, but not JNK, MAP kinase pathway.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2009; 204(1): 135–47. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 58.
Faccidomo S, Salling MC, Galunas C, et al.:
Operant ethanol self-administration increases extracellular-signal regulated protein kinase (ERK) phosphorylation in reward-related brain regions: selective regulation of positive reinforcement in the prefrontal cortex of C57BL/6J mice.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2015; 232(18): 3417–30. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 59.
Schroeder JP, Spanos M, Stevenson JR, et al.:
Cue-induced reinstatement of alcohol-seeking behavior is associated with increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation in specific limbic brain regions: blockade by the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP.
Neuropharmacology.
2008; 55(4): 546–54. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 60.
Cannady R, Fisher KR, Durant B, et al.:
Enhanced AMPA receptor activity increases operant alcohol self-administration and cue-induced reinstatement.
Addict Biol.
2013; 18(1): 54–65. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 61.
Cannady R, Fisher KR, Graham C, et al.:
Potentiation of amygdala AMPA receptor activity selectively promotes escalated alcohol self-administration in a CaMKII-dependent manner.
Addict Biol.
2016. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 62.
Salling MC, Faccidomo SP, Li C, et al.:
Moderate Alcohol Drinking and the Amygdala Proteome: Identification and Validation of Calcium/Calmodulin Dependent Kinase II and AMPA Receptor Activity as Novel Molecular Mechanisms of the Positive Reinforcing Effects of Alcohol.
Biol Psychiatry.
2016; 79(6): 430–42. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 63.
Faccidomo S, Reid GT, Agoglia AE, et al.:
CaMKII inhibition in the prefrontal cortex specifically increases the positive reinforcing effects of sweetened alcohol in C57BL/6J mice.
Behav Brain Res.
2016; 298(Pt B): 286–90. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 64.
Grant KA:
Strategies for understanding the pharmacological effects of ethanol with drug discrimination procedures.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav.
1999; 64(2): 261–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 65.
Kostowski W, Bieńkowski P:
Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol: neuropharmacological characterization.
Alcohol.
1999; 17(1): 63–80. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 66.
Hodge CW, Cox AA:
The discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol are mediated by NMDA and GABA(A) receptors in specific limbic brain regions.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
1998; 139(1–2): 95–107. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 67.
Hundt W, Danysz W, Hölter SM, et al.:
Ethanol and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor complex interactions: a detailed drug discrimination study in the rat.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
1998; 135(1): 44–51. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 68.
Vivian JA, Waters CA, Szeliga KT, et al.:
Characterization of the discriminative stimulus effects of N-methyl- D-aspartate ligands under different ethanol training conditions in the cynomolgus monkey ( Macaca fascicularis).
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2002; 162(3): 273–81. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 69.
Spanagel R, Zieglgänsberger W, Hundt W:
Acamprosate and alcohol: III. Effects on alcohol discrimination in the rat.
Eur J Pharmacol.
1996; 305(1–3): 51–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 70.
Besheer J, Cox AA, Hodge CW:
Coregulation of ethanol discrimination by the nucleus accumbens and amygdala.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2003; 27(3): 450–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 71.
Besheer J, Stevenson RA, Hodge CW:
mGlu5 receptors are involved in the discriminative stimulus effects of self-administered ethanol in rats.
Eur J Pharmacol.
2006; 551(1–3): 71–5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 72.
Besheer J, Grondin JJ, Salling MC, et al.:
Interoceptive effects of alcohol require mGlu5 receptor activity in the nucleus accumbens.
J Neurosci.
2009; 29(30): 9582–91. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 73.
Cannady R, Grondin JJ, Fisher KR, et al.:
Activation of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors inhibits the discriminative stimulus effects of alcohol via selective activity within the amygdala.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2011; 36(11): 2328–38. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 74.
Besheer J, Fisher KR, Cannady R, et al.:
Intra-amygdala inhibition of ERK1/2 potentiates the discriminative stimulus effects of alcohol.
Behav Brain Res.
2012; 228(2): 398–405. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 75.
Besheer J, Fisher KR, Jaramillo AA, et al.:
Stress hormone exposure reduces mGluR5 expression in the nucleus accumbens: functional implications for interoceptive sensitivity to alcohol.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2014; 39(10): 2376–86. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 76.
Jaramillo AA, Randall PA, Frisbee S, et al.:
Activation of mGluR2/3 following stress hormone exposure restores sensitivity to alcohol in rats.
Alcohol.
2015; 49(6): 525–32. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 77.
Jaramillo AA, Randall PA, Frisbee S, et al.:
Modulation of sensitivity to alcohol by cortical and thalamic brain regions.
Eur J Neurosci.
2016; 44(8): 2569–80. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 78.
Brigman JL, Daut RA, Wright T, et al.:
GluN2B in corticostriatal circuits governs choice learning and choice shifting.
Nat Neurosci.
2013; 16(8): 1101–10. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 79.
Fu R, Zuo W, Gregor D, et al.:
Pharmacological Manipulation of the Rostromedial Tegmental Nucleus Changes Voluntary and Operant Ethanol Self-Administration in Rats.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2016; 40(3): 572–82. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 80.
Miczek KA, Barros HM, Sakoda L, et al.:
Alcohol and heightened aggression in individual mice.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
1998; 22(8): 1698–705. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 81.
Newman EL, Chu A, Bahamon B, et al.:
NMDA receptor antagonism: escalation of aggressive behavior in alcohol-drinking mice.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2012; 224(1): 167–77. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 82.
Quadros IM, Hwa LS, Shimamoto A, et al.:
Prevention of alcohol-heightened aggression by CRF-R1 antagonists in mice: critical role for DRN-PFC serotonin pathway.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2014; 39(12): 2874–83. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 83.
Naimi TS, Brewer RD, Mokdad A, et al.:
Binge drinking among US adults.
JAMA.
2003; 289(1): 70–5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 84.
Bates ME, Labouvie EW:
Adolescent risk factors and the prediction of persistent alcohol and drug use into adulthood.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
1997; 21(5): 944–50. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 85.
Lee E, Jang DP, Kim JJ, et al.:
Alteration of brain metabolites in young alcoholics without structural changes.
Neuroreport.
2007; 18(14): 1511–4. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 86.
Silveri MM, Cohen-Gilbert J, Crowley DJ, et al.:
Altered anterior cingulate neurochemistry in emerging adult binge drinkers with a history of alcohol-induced blackouts.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2014; 38(4): 969–79. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 87.
Kapasova Z, Szumlinski KK:
Strain differences in alcohol-induced neurochemical plasticity: a role for accumbens glutamate in alcohol intake.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2008; 32(4): 617–31. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 88.
Ward RJ, Colivicchi MA, Allen R, et al.:
Neuro-inflammation induced in the hippocampus of 'binge drinking' rats may be mediated by elevated extracellular glutamate content.
J Neurochem.
2009; 111(5): 1119–28. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 89.
Hermens DF, Chitty KM, Lee RS, et al.:
Hippocampal glutamate is increased and associated with risky drinking in young adults with major depression.
J Affect Disord.
2015; 186: 95–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 90.
Rhodes JS, Best K, Belknap JK, et al.:
Evaluation of a simple model of ethanol drinking to intoxication in C57BL/6J mice.
Physiol Behav.
2005; 84(1): 53–63. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 91.
Thiele TE, Crabbe JC, Boehm SL 2nd:
"Drinking in the Dark" (DID): a simple mouse model of binge-like alcohol intake.
Curr Protoc Neurosci.
2014; 68: 9.49.1–12. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 92.
Silvestre de Ferron B, Bennouar KE, Kervern M, et al.:
Two Binges of Ethanol a Day Keep the Memory Away in Adolescent Rats: Key Role for GLUN2B Subunit.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol.
2015; 19(1): pii: pyv087. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 93.
Gupta T, Syed YM, Revis AA, et al.:
Acute effects of acamprosate and MPEP on ethanol Drinking-in-the-Dark in male C57BL/6J mice.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2008; 32(11): 1992–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 94.
Cozzoli DK, Courson J, Caruana AL, et al.:
Nucleus accumbens mGluR5-associated signaling regulates binge alcohol drinking under drinking-in-the-dark procedures.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2012; 36(9): 1623–33. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 95.
Cozzoli DK, Courson J, Rostock C, et al.:
Protein Kinase C Epsilon Activity in the Nucleus Accumbens and Central Nucleus of the Amygdala Mediates Binge Alcohol Consumption.
Biol Psychiatry.
2016; 79(6): 443–51. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 96.
Cozzoli DK, Courson J, Wroten MG, et al.:
Binge alcohol drinking by mice requires intact group1 metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling within the central nucleus of the amygdala.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2014; 39(2): 435–44. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 97.
Lum EN, Campbell RR, Rostock C, et al.:
mGluR1 within the nucleus accumbens regulates alcohol intake in mice under limited-access conditions.
Neuropharmacology.
2014; 79: 679–87. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 98.
Meyers JL, Salling MC, Almli LM, et al.:
Frequency of alcohol consumption in humans; the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors and downstream signaling pathways.
Transl Psychiatry.
2015; 5(6): e586. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 99.
Agoglia AE, Holstein SE, Reid G, et al.:
CaMKIIalpha-GluA1 Activity Underlies Vulnerability to Adolescent Binge Alcohol Drinking.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2015; 39(9): 1680–90. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 100.
Wilcox MV, Cuzon Carlson VC, Sherazee N, et al.:
Repeated binge-like ethanol drinking alters ethanol drinking patterns and depresses striatal GABAergic transmission.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2014; 39(3): 579–94. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 101.
Rinker JA, Marshall SA, Mazzone CM, et al.:
Extended Amygdala to Ventral Tegmental Area Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Circuit Controls Binge Ethanol Intake.
Biol Psychiatry.
2016; pii: S0006-3223(16)30006-3. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 102.
Bernier BE, Whitaker LR, Morikawa H:
Previous ethanol experience enhances synaptic plasticity of NMDA receptors in the ventral tegmental area.
J Neurosci.
2011; 31(14): 5205–12. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 103.
Linsenbardt DN, Moore EM, Griffin KD, et al.:
Tolerance to ethanol's ataxic effects and alterations in ethanol-induced locomotion following repeated binge-like ethanol intake using the DID model.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2011; 35(7): 1246–55. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 104.
Finn DA, Belknap JK, Cronise K, et al.:
A procedure to produce high alcohol intake in mice.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2005; 178(4): 471–80. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 105.
Cozzoli DK, Goulding SP, Zhang PW, et al.:
Binge drinking upregulates accumbens mGluR5-Homer2-PI3K signaling: functional implications for alcoholism.
J Neurosci.
2009; 29(27): 8655–68. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 106.
Murphy JM, Gatto GJ, Waller MB, et al.:
Effects of scheduled access on ethanol intake by the alcohol-preferring (P) line of rats.
Alcohol.
1986; 3(5): 331–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 107.
Bell RL, Kimpel MW, Rodd ZA, et al.:
Protein expression changes in the nucleus accumbens and amygdala of inbred alcohol-preferring rats given either continuous or scheduled access to ethanol.
Alcohol.
2006; 40(1): 3–17. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 108.
Bell RL, Kimpel MW, McClintick JN, et al.:
Gene expression changes in the nucleus accumbens of alcohol-preferring rats following chronic ethanol consumption.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav.
2009; 94(1): 131–47. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 109.
McBride WJ, Kimpel MW, Schultz JA, et al.:
Changes in gene expression in regions of the extended amygdala of alcohol-preferring rats after binge-like alcohol drinking.
Alcohol.
2010; 44(2): 171–83. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 110.
Bell RL, Hauser SR, McClintick J, et al.:
Ethanol-Associated Changes in Glutamate Reward Neurocircuitry: A Minireview of Clinical and Preclinical Genetic Findings.
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci.
2016; 137: 41–85. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 111.
Salimov RM, Salimova NB:
The alcohol-deprivation effect in hybrid mice.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
1993; 32(2): 187–91. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 112.
Spanagel R, Hölter SM, Allingham K, et al.:
Acamprosate and alcohol: I. Effects on alcohol intake following alcohol deprivation in the rat.
Eur J Pharmacol.
1996; 305(1–3): 39–44. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 113.
(SAMHSA), S. A. and M. H. S. A: 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH).2014. Reference Source
- 114.
Association A.P:
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.2013. Reference Source
- 115.
Tsai GE, Ragan P, Chang R, et al.:
Increased glutamatergic neurotransmission and oxidative stress after alcohol withdrawal.
Am J Psychiatry.
1998; 155(6): 726–32. PubMed Abstract
- 116.
Yeo RA, Thoma RJ, Gasparovic C, et al.:
Neurometabolite concentration and clinical features of chronic alcohol use: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.
Psychiatry Res.
2013; 211(2): 141–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 117.
Ende G, Hermann D, Demirakca T, et al.:
Loss of control of alcohol use and severity of alcohol dependence in non-treatment-seeking heavy drinkers are related to lower glutamate in frontal white matter.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2013; 37(10): 1643–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 118.
Bauer J, Pedersen A, Scherbaum N, et al.:
Craving in alcohol-dependent patients after detoxification is related to glutamatergic dysfunction in the nucleus accumbens and the anterior cingulate cortex.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2013; 38(8): 1401–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 119.
Mon A, Durazzo TC, Meyerhoff DJ:
Glutamate, GABA, and other cortical metabolite concentrations during early abstinence from alcohol and their associations with neurocognitive changes.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2012; 125(1–2): 27–36. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 120.
Krystal JH, Petrakis IL, Webb E, et al.:
Dose-related ethanol-like effects of the NMDA antagonist, ketamine, in recently detoxified alcoholics.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
1998; 55(4): 354–60. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 121.
Krystal JH, Petrakis IL, Limoncelli D, et al.:
Altered NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist response in recovering ethanol-dependent patients.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2003; 28(11): 2020–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 122.
Krystal JH, Petrakis IL, Limoncelli D, et al.:
Characterization of the interactive effects of glycine and D-cycloserine in men: further evidence for enhanced NMDA receptor function associated with human alcohol dependence.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2011; 36(3): 701–10. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 123.
Evans SM, Levin FR, Brooks DJ, et al.:
A pilot double-blind treatment trial of memantine for alcohol dependence.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2007; 31(5): 775–82. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 124.
Anton RF, O'Malley SS, Ciraulo DA, et al.:
Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence: the COMBINE study: a randomized controlled trial.
JAMA.
2006; 295(17): 2003–17. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 125.
Mann K, Lemenager T, Hoffmann S, et al.:
Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled pharmacotherapy trial in alcoholism conducted in Germany and comparison with the US COMBINE study.
Addict Biol.
2013; 18(6): 937–46. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 126.
Bisaga A, Evans SM:
Acute effects of memantine in combination with alcohol in moderate drinkers.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2004; 172(1): 16–24. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 127.
Krupitsky EM, Neznanova O, Masalov D, et al.:
Effect of memantine on cue-induced alcohol craving in recovering alcohol-dependent patients.
Am J Psychiatry.
2007; 164(3): 519–23. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 128.
Schumann G, Johann M, Frank J, et al.:
Systematic analysis of glutamatergic neurotransmission genes in alcohol dependence and adolescent risky drinking behavior.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
2008; 65(7): 826–38. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 129.
Biermann T, Reulbach U, Lenz B, et al.:
N-methyl-D-aspartate 2b receptor subtype (NR2B) promoter methylation in patients during alcohol withdrawal.
J Neural Transm (Vienna).
2009; 116(5): 615–22. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 130.
Bach P, Kirsch M, Hoffmann S, et al.:
The effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms in glutamatergic neurotransmission genes on neural response to alcohol cues and craving.
Addict Biol.
2015; 20(6): 1022–32. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 131.
Wise RA:
Voluntary ethanol intake in rats following exposure to ethanol on various schedules.
Psychopharmacologia.
1973; 29(3): 203–10. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 132.
Simms JA, Steensland P, Medina B, et al.:
Intermittent access to 20% ethanol induces high ethanol consumption in Long-Evans and Wistar rats.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2008; 32(10): 1816–23. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 133.
Carnicella S, Ron D, Barak S:
Intermittent ethanol access schedule in rats as a preclinical model of alcohol abuse.
Alcohol.
2014; 48(3): 243–52. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 134.
Hopf FW, Chang SJ, Sparta DR, et al.:
Motivation for alcohol becomes resistant to quinine adulteration after 3 to 4 months of intermittent alcohol self-administration.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2010; 34(9): 1565–73. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 135.
Hwa LS, Chu A, Levinson SA, et al.:
Persistent escalation of alcohol drinking in C57BL/6J mice with intermittent access to 20% ethanol.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2011; 35(11): 1938–47. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 136.
Hwa LS, Nathanson AJ, Shimamoto A, et al.:
Aggression and increased glutamate in the mPFC during withdrawal from intermittent alcohol in outbred mice.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2015; 232(16): 2889–902. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 137.
Hwa LS, Debold JF, Miczek KA:
Alcohol in excess: CRF1 receptors in the rat and mouse VTA and DRN.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2013; 225(2): 313–27. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 138.
McGuier NS, Padula AE, Lopez MF, et al.:
Withdrawal from chronic intermittent alcohol exposure increases dendritic spine density in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex of mice.
Alcohol.
2015; 49(1): 21–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 139.
Stuber GD, Hopf FW, Hahn J, et al.:
Voluntary ethanol intake enhances excitatory synaptic strength in the ventral tegmental area.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2008; 32(10): 1714–20. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 140.
Cuzon Carlson VC, Seabold GK, Helms CM, et al.:
Synaptic and morphological neuroadaptations in the putamen associated with long-term, relapsing alcohol drinking in primates.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2011; 36(12): 2513–28. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 141.
Obara I, Bell RL, Goulding SP, et al.:
Differential effects of chronic ethanol consumption and withdrawal on homer/glutamate receptor expression in subregions of the accumbens and amygdala of P rats.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2009; 33(11): 1924–34. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 142.
Szumlinski KK, Ary AW, Lominac KD, et al.:
Accumbens Homer2 overexpression facilitates alcohol-induced neuroplasticity in C57BL/6J mice.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2008; 33(6): 1365–78. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 143.
Das SC, Yamamoto BK, Hristov AM, et al.:
Ceftriaxone attenuates ethanol drinking and restores extracellular glutamate concentration through normalization of GLT-1 in nucleus accumbens of male alcohol-preferring rats.
Neuropharmacology.
2015; 97: 67–74. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 144.
Rao PS, Bell RL, Engleman EA, et al.:
Targeting glutamate uptake to treat alcohol use disorders.
Front Neurosci.
2015; 9: 144. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 145.
George O, Sanders C, Freiling J, et al.:
Recruitment of medial prefrontal cortex neurons during alcohol withdrawal predicts cognitive impairment and excessive alcohol drinking.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2012; 109(44): 18156–61. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 146.
Seif T, Chang SJ, Simms JA, et al.:
Cortical activation of accumbens hyperpolarization-active NMDARs mediates aversion-resistant alcohol intake.
Nat Neurosci.
2013; 16(8): 1094–100. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 147.
Griffin WC 3rd, Lopez MF, Becker HC:
Intensity and duration of chronic ethanol exposure is critical for subsequent escalation of voluntary ethanol drinking in mice.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2009; 33(11): 1893–900. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 148.
Griffin WC 3rd:
Alcohol dependence and free-choice drinking in mice.
Alcohol.
2014; 48(3): 287–93. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 149.
Gilpin NW, Smith AD, Cole M, et al.:
Operant behavior and alcohol levels in blood and brain of alcohol-dependent rats.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2009; 33(12): 2113–23. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 150.
Rossetti ZL, Carboni S:
Ethanol withdrawal is associated with increased extracellular glutamate in the rat striatum.
Eur J Pharmacol.
1995; 283(1–3): 177–83. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 151.
Dahchour A, De Witte P, Bolo N, et al.:
Central effects of acamprosate: part 1. Acamprosate blocks the glutamate increase in the nucleus accumbens microdialysate in ethanol withdrawn rats.
Psychiatry Res.
1998; 82(2): 107–14. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 152.
Melendez RI, Hicks MP, Cagle SS, et al.:
Ethanol exposure decreases glutamate uptake in the nucleus accumbens.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2005; 29(3): 326–33. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 153.
Griffin WC 3rd, Haun HL, Hazelbaker CL, et al.:
Increased extracellular glutamate in the nucleus accumbens promotes excessive ethanol drinking in ethanol dependent mice.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2014; 39(3): 707–17. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 154.
Dahchour A, De Witte P:
Effect of repeated ethanol withdrawal on glutamate microdialysate in the hippocampus.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
1999; 23(10): 1698–703. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 155.
Claus D, Kim JS, Kornhuber ME, et al.:
[Effect of ethanol on the neurotransmitters glutamate and GABA].
Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970).
1982; 232(2): 183–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 156.
Erden BF, Ozdemirci S, Yildiran G, et al.:
Dextromethorphan attenuates ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav.
1999; 62(3): 537–41. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 157.
Grant KA, Valverius P, Hudspith M, et al.:
Ethanol withdrawal seizures and the NMDA receptor complex.
Eur J Pharmacol.
1990; 176(3): 289–96. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 158.
Stepanyan TD, Farook JM, Kowalski A, et al.:
Alcohol withdrawal-induced hippocampal neurotoxicity in vitro and seizures in vivo are both reduced by memantine.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2008; 32(12): 2128–35. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 159.
Kroener S, Mulholland PJ, New NN, et al.:
Chronic alcohol exposure alters behavioral and synaptic plasticity of the rodent prefrontal cortex.
PLoS One.
2012; 7(5): e37541. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 160.
Radke AK, Jury NJ, Kocharian A, et al.:
Chronic EtOH effects on putative measures of compulsive behavior in mice.
Addict Biol.
2017; 22(2): 423–434. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 161.
Meinhardt MW, Hansson AC, Perreau-Lenz S, et al.:
Rescue of infralimbic mGluR2 deficit restores control over drug-seeking behavior in alcohol dependence.
J Neurosci.
2013; 33(7): 2794–806. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 162.
Olive MF, Becker HC:
Effects of the mGluR2/3 agonist LY379268 and the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP on handling-induced convulsions during ethanol withdrawal in mice.
Alcohol.
2008; 42(3): 191–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 163.
Hu W, Morris B, Carrasco A, et al.:
Effects of acamprosate on attentional set-shifting and cellular function in the prefrontal cortex of chronic alcohol-exposed mice.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2015; 39(6): 953–61. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 164.
Abulseoud OA, Camsari UM, Ruby CL, et al.:
Attenuation of ethanol withdrawal by ceftriaxone-induced upregulation of glutamate transporter EAAT2.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2014; 39(7): 1674–84. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 165.
Lee MR, Hinton DJ, Wu J, et al.:
Acamprosate reduces ethanol drinking behaviors and alters the metabolite profile in mice lacking ENT1.
Neurosci Lett.
2011; 490(2): 90–5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 166.
Nam HW, Lee MR, Zhu Y, et al.:
Type 1 equilibrative nucleoside transporter regulates ethanol drinking through accumbal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor signaling.
Biol Psychiatry.
2011; 69(11): 1043–51. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 167.
Sari Y:
Potential therapeutic role of glutamate transporter 1 for the treatment of alcohol dependence.
OA Alcohol.
2013; 1(1): 6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 168.
Griffin WC, Ramachandra VS, Knackstedt LA, et al.:
Repeated cycles of chronic intermittent ethanol exposure increases basal glutamate in the nucleus accumbens of mice without affecting glutamate transport.
Front Pharmacol.
2015; 6: 27. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 169.
George O, Koob GF:
Individual differences in prefrontal cortex function and the transition from drug use to drug dependence.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev.
2010; 35(2): 232–47. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 170.
Roberto M, Schweitzer P, Madamba SG, et al.:
Acute and chronic ethanol alter glutamatergic transmission in rat central amygdala: an in vitro and in vivo analysis.
J Neurosci.
2004; 24(7): 1594–603. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 171.
Freeman K, Staehle MM, Vadigepalli R, et al.:
Coordinated dynamic gene expression changes in the central nucleus of the amygdala during alcohol withdrawal.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2013; 37(Suppl 1): E88–100. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 172.
Floyd DW, Jung KY, McCool BA:
Chronic ethanol ingestion facilitates N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function and expression in rat lateral/basolateral amygdala neurons.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther.
2003; 307(3): 1020–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 173.
Carpenter-Hyland EP, Woodward JJ, Chandler LJ:
Chronic ethanol induces synaptic but not extrasynaptic targeting of NMDA receptors.
J Neurosci.
2004; 24(36): 7859–68. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 174.
Kash TL, Baucum AJ 2nd, Conrad KL, et al.:
Alcohol exposure alters NMDAR function in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2009; 34(11): 2420–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 175.
Wills TA, Klug JR, Silberman Y, et al.:
GluN2B subunit deletion reveals key role in acute and chronic ethanol sensitivity of glutamate synapses in bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2012; 109(5): E278–87. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 176.
Masneuf S, Lowery-Gionta E, Colacicco G, et al.:
Glutamatergic mechanisms associated with stress-induced amygdala excitability and anxiety-related behavior.
Neuropharmacology.
2014; 85: 190–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 177.
Kallupi M, Varodayan FP, Oleata CS, et al.:
Nociceptin/orphanin FQ decreases glutamate transmission and blocks ethanol-induced effects in the central amygdala of naive and ethanol-dependent rats.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2014; 39(5): 1081–92. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| Faculty Opinions Recommendation
- 178.
Koob GF:
A role for brain stress systems in addiction.
Neuron.
2008; 59(1): 11–34. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 179.
Reynolds AR, Berry JN, Sharrett-Field L, et al.:
Ethanol withdrawal is required to produce persisting N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-dependent hippocampal cytotoxicity during chronic intermittent ethanol exposure.
Alcohol.
2015; 49(3): 219–27. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 180.
Brigman JL, Wright T, Talani G, et al.:
Loss of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors in CA1 hippocampus and cortex impairs long-term depression, reduces dendritic spine density, and disrupts learning.
J Neurosci.
2010; 30(13): 4590–600. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 181.
Kiselycznyk C, Svenningsson P, Delpire E, et al.:
Genetic, pharmacological and lesion analyses reveal a selective role for corticohippocampal GLUN2B in a novel repeated swim stress paradigm.
Neuroscience.
2011; 193: 259–68. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 182.
Reissner KJ, Kalivas PW:
Using glutamate homeostasis as a target for treating addictive disorders.
Behav Pharmacol.
2010; 21(5–6): 514–22. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 183.
McClearn GE, Rodgers DA:
Genetic factors in alcohol preference of laboratory mice.
J Comp Physiol Psychol.
1961; 54: 116–9. Publisher Full Text
- 184.
Belknap JK, Crabbe JC, Young ER:
Voluntary consumption of ethanol in 15 inbred mouse strains.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
1993; 112(4): 503–10. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 185.
Elmer GI, Meisch RA, George FR:
Mouse strain differences in operant self-administration of ethanol.
Behav Genet.
1987; 17(5): 439–51. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 186.
Melendez RI, Rodd-Henricks ZA, Engleman EA, et al.:
Microdialysis of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens of alcohol-preferring (P) rats during anticipation and operant self-administration of ethanol.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2002; 26(3): 318–25. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 187.
Lê AD, Quan B, Juzytch W, et al.:
Reinstatement of alcohol-seeking by priming injections of alcohol and exposure to stress in rats.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
1998; 135(2): 169–74. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 188.
Chaudhri N, Sahuque LL, Schairer WW, et al.:
Separable roles of the nucleus accumbens core and shell in context- and cue-induced alcohol-seeking.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2010; 35(3): 783–91. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 189.
Sinclair JD, Walker S, Jordan W:
Behavioral and physiological changes associated with various durations of alcohol deprivation in rats.
Q J Stud Alcohol.
1973; 34(3): 744–57. PubMed Abstract
- 190.
Melendez RI, Middaugh LD, Kalivas PW:
Development of an alcohol deprivation and escalation effect in C57BL/6J mice.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2006; 30(12): 2017–25. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 191.
Goldstein DB:
Relationship of alcohol dose to intensity of withdrawal signs in mice.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther.
1972; 180(2): 203–15. PubMed Abstract
- 192.
O'Dell LE, Roberts AJ, Smith RT, et al.:
Enhanced alcohol self-administration after intermittent versus continuous alcohol vapor exposure.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2004; 28(11): 1676–82. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 193.
Lopez MF, Becker HC:
Effect of pattern and number of chronic ethanol exposures on subsequent voluntary ethanol intake in C57BL/6J mice.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2005; 181(4): 688–96. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
Comments on this article Comments (0)