J Korean Fract Soc. 2014 Oct;27(4):332-337. Korean.
Published online Oct 20, 2014.
Copyright © 2014 The Korean Fracture Society. All rights reserved.
Review

Authorship, Another Research Misconduct

Dong Soo Han, M.D., Ph.D.
    • Department of Gastroenterology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Notes

Financial support: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

References

    1. Kakuk P. The legacy of the Hwang case: research misconduct in biosciences. Sci Eng Ethics 2009;15:545–562.
    1. Hvistendahl M. Science for sale: inflated collaboration claims--response. Science 2014;343:612.
    1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The new ICMJE recommendations (August 2013) [Internet]. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; 2013 [cited 2014 Aug 20].
    1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ethical considerations in the conduct andreporting of research. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication [Internet]. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; 2008 [cited 2014 Aug 20].
    1. Shaw D. The ICMJE's definition of authorship is illogical and unethical. BMJ 2011;343:d7192.
    1. Stephenson J. In: JAMA. 310. 2013. ICMJE: all authors of medical journal articles have "responsibility to stand by the integrity of the entire work"; pp. 1216.
    1. Albert T, Wager L. How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers [Internet]. Committee on Publication Ethics; 2003
      Available from: The COPE Report 2003http://publicationethics.org/files/2003pdf12.pdf/.
    1. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. Good publication practice guidelines for medical journals. 2nd ed. Seoul: KAMJE; 2013.
    1. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Kulkarni AV, et al. Perceptions of authors' contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:1049–1054.
    1. Brennan PM, Jubb A, Baillie JK, Partridge RW. Deciding authorship order. BMJ 2013;347:f7182.
    1. Ebrahimpour M, Putniņš TJ, Berryman MJ, Allison A, Ng BW, Abbott D. Automated authorship attribution using advanced signal classification techniques. PLoS One 2013;8:e54998.
    1. Marušić A, Bošnjak L, Jerončić A. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS One 2011;6:e23477.
    1. Slone RM. Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:571–579.
    1. Mowatt G, Shirran L, Grimshaw JM, et al. Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews. JAMA 2002;287:2769–2771.
    1. Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA 1998;280:222–224.
    1. Bonekamp S, Halappa VG, Corona-Villalobos CP, et al. Prevalence of honorary coauthorship in the American Journal of Roentgenology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:1247–1255.
    1. Greenland P, Fontanarosa PB. Ending honorary authorship. Science 2012;337:1019.
    1. Abbasi K. Transparency and trust. BMJ 2004;329
    1. Collier R. Prevalence of ghostwriting spurs calls for transparency. CMAJ 2009;181:E161–E162.
    1. Healy D, Cattell D. Interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeutics. Br J Psychiatry 2003;183:22–27.
    1. PLoS Medicine Editors. Ghostwriting: the dirty little secret of medical publishing that just got bigger. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000156.
    1. Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Deangelis CD. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ 2011;343:d6128.
    1. Matheson A. How industry uses the ICMJE guidelines to manipulate authorship--and how they should be revised. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1001072.
    1. Stretton S. Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004777.
    1. McDonald RJ, Neff KL, Rethlefsen ML, Kallmes DF. Effects of author contribution disclosures and numeric limitations on authorship trends. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:920–927.
    1. Lok AS. Authorship: who should be included and how should it be determined? Gastroenterology 2011;141:786–788.
    1. Eggert LD. Best practices for allocating appropriate credit and responsibility to authors of multi-authored articles. Front Psychol 2011;2:196.
    1. Dance A. Authorship: who's on first? Nature 2012;489:591–593.
    1. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. Flowcharts: what to do if you suspect redundant (duplicate) publication [Internet]. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors; 2013 [cited 2014 Aug 19].
    1. Committee on Publication Ethics. Flowcharts: what to do if you suspect redundant (duplicate) publication [Internet]. Committee on Publication Ethics; 2008 [cited 2014 Aug 19].
    1. ORCID Inc.. ORCID connecting research and researchers. What is ORCID? [Internet]. Bethesda: ORCID inc.; [cited 2014 Aug 12].

Metrics
Share
PERMALINK