J Korean Fract Soc. 2013 Oct;26(4):254-260. Korean.
Published online Oct 18, 2013.
Copyright © 2013 The Korean Fracture Society. All rights reserved.
Original Article

Posterior-Posterior Dual Plates Fixation for the Distal Humerus Fractures

Yoon-Min Lee, M.D., Seok-Whan Song, M.D., Ph.D., Ki-Bum Choi, M.D., Yoo-Joon Sur, M.D., Ph.D.,* and Sung-Eun Kim, M.D.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    • *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, Korea.
Received December 09, 2012; Revised February 21, 2013; Accepted July 14, 2013.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

Fractures of the distal humerus are one of the challenging injuries due to its complex anatomy and accompanied comminution. For dual plate fixation, orthogonal or parallel plating is widely used, but the better of the two is debatable. The purpose of this study was to report another fixation technique that yielded good clinical results with early bone union of distal humerus fracture, namely, posterior-posterior plate fixation.

Materials and Methods

From March 2003 to March 2012, 20 patients with distal humerus fractures were treated by posterior-posterior plate fixation. The triceps reflecting approach was used with anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve. The mean age at the time of injury was 45 years (range, 26 to 78 years). By AO classification of distal humerus fractures, there were one case of A2 and B3 respectively, two cases of each A3, C1 and C3, and twelve cases of C2.

Results

The mean period of complete bone union was 7.1 weeks (range, 4 to 11 weeks). The mean flexion-extension range of motion of the elbow joint at last follow-up was 116.2 degrees. The mean pronation was 81.2 degrees and supination was 83.1 degrees. Plates and screws were removed at about nine months after the initial surgery. No cases showed complications or required additional operation.

Conclusion

Posterior-posterior dual plates fixation resulted in stable bicortical screw fixation, and insertion of lag screws were possible without interference. Posterior-posterior plating could be an easy and stable fixation method that provides good clinical results.

Keywords
Distal humerus; Fracture; Posterior-posterior plate fixation

Figures

Fig. 1
(A) Initial radiographs show a distal humerus fracture with comminution (AO classification C2).

(B) Fracture site was well reduced and fixed with posterior-posterior dual plates.

(C) Last follow-up radiographs

Fig. 2
(A) Initial radiographs show fixation failure with anterior angulation and nonunion of the fracture site.

(B) At postoperation 12 weeks, union was achieved at the nonunion site.

Tables

Table 1
Summary of Cases

References

    1. Abzug JM, Dantuluri PK. Use of orthogonal or parallel plating techniques to treat distal humerus fractures. Hand Clin 2010;26:411–421.
    1. Arnander MW, Reeves A, MacLeod IA, Pinto TM, Khaleel A. A biomechanical comparison of plate configuration in distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:332–336.
    1. Jupiter JB, Neff U, Holzach P, Allgöwer M. Intercondylar fractures of the humerus. An operative approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:226–239.
    1. Koonce RC, Baldini TH, Morgan SJ. Are conventional reconstruction plates equivalent to precontoured locking plates for distal humerus fracture fixation? A biomechanics cadaver study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012;27:697–701.
    1. Korner J, Diederichs G, Arzdorf M, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of methods of distal humerus fracture fixation using locking compression plates versus conventional reconstruction plates. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:286–293.
    1. Korner J, Lill H, Müller LP, Rommens PM, Schneider E, Linke B. The LCP-concept in the operative treatment of distal humerus fractures-biological, biomechanical and surgical aspects. Injury 2003;34 Suppl 2:B20–B30.
    1. Muller ME. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. In: Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H, editors. Manual of internal fixation: techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1991. pp. 150-188.
    1. O'Driscoll SW. Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14:186S–194S.
    1. O'Driscoll SW. Parallel plate fixation of bicolumn distal humeral fractures. Instr Course Lect 2009;58:521–528.
    1. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Torchia ME, O'Driscoll SW. Complex distal humeral fractures: internal fixation with a principle-based parallel-plate technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:961–969.
    1. Schemitsch EH, Tencer AF, Henley MB. Biomechanical evaluation of methods of internal fixation of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 1994;8:468–475.
    1. Self J, Viegas SF, Buford WL Jr, Patterson RM. A comparison of double-plate fixation methods for complex distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995;4:10–16.
    1. Shin SJ, Sohn HS, Do NH. A clinical comparison of two different double plating methods for intraarticular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19:2–9.
    1. Stoffel K, Cunneen S, Morgan R, Nicholls R, Stachowiak G. Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Res 2008;26:778–784.
    1. Throckmorton TW, Zarkadas PC, Steinmann SP. Distal humerus fractures. Hand Clin 2007;23:457–469.
    1. Zalavras CG, Vercillo MT, Jun BJ, Otarodifard K, Itamura JM, Lee TQ. Biomechanical evaluation of parallel versus orthogonal plate fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20:12–20.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 2

Tables

1 / 1

PERMALINK