Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Quarterly
pISSN 1225-1682
eISSN 2287-9293
    J Korean Fract Soc. 2011 Jan;24(1):60-66. Korean.
    Published online Jan 21, 2011.
    https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2011.24.1.60
    Copyright © 2011 The Korean Fracture Society
    Original Article

    Comparison of Early Fixation and Late Fusion of 4, 5th Carpometacarpal Joint in the Intra-Articular Fractures of 4th and 5th Metacarpal Base

    Chang Ho Yi, M.D. and Jin Rok Oh, M.D.
      • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.
    • Address reprint requests to: Jin Rok Oh, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 162, Ilsan-dong, Wonju 220-701, Korea. Tel: 82-33-741-1355·Fax: 82-33-746-7326, Email: jroh@yonsei.ac.kr
    Received July 24, 2010; Revised December 17, 2010; Accepted December 29, 2010.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Purpose

    To evaluate clinical results between early fixation group and delayed fusion group in treatment of intraarticular fracture of 4th, 5th metacarpal base.

    Materials and Methods

    From March 2002 to December 2006, 21 cases of early fusion and 11 cases of delayed fusion of 4, 5th carpometacarpal joint were reviewed retrospectively or were included in this study. Average follow up period is 39.9 months. Bony union was checked by plain films at follow up. DASH-questionnaire, VAS pain scale, grip power and range of motion of 4th, 5th metacarpophalangeal joint were also checked at last follow up.

    Results

    In radiologic study, bony union was confirmed in all cases of two groups. Early fixation group showed better outcomes than delayed fusion group in range of motion, DASH-questionnaire and VAS pain scale with statistical significant (p<0.004).

    Conclusion

    Because early fixation group showed better clinical outcomes than delayed fusion group, early diagnosis and proper surgical treatment are important for better outcomes in treatment of intraarticular fracture of 4th, 5th metacarpal base.

    Keywords
    4th, 5th metacarpal base; Early fixation; Delayed fusion

    Figures

    Fig. 1
    Three-dimensional reconstruction image of computed tomography shows the intraarticular fractures occurred simultaneously in the fourth and fifth metacarpal base.

    Fig. 2
    24 year-old patient came with fractures in the fourth and fifth metacarpal base by traffic accident (A).

    He diagnosed immediately at emergency department, so he was taken surgery at two day after trauma (B).

    At postoperative 9 months, bony union was confirmed in plain film (C).

    Fig. 3
    18 year-old patient came with fractures in the fourth metacarpal base and hamate with dislocation of 4th, 5th carpometacarpal joint by traffic accident (A).

    For firm fixation of hamate, 4th metacarpal bone and hamate were tied up together by hand mini plate & screws (B).

    At postoperative 12 months, bony union was confirmed in plain film (C).

    Fig. 4
    54 year-old female came to outpatient department complained prolonged pain at the fourth and fifth metacarpal base area after fall down injury 2 months ago (A).

    Because of non-union, she was taken arthrodesis with autoiliac bone graft with hand-mini plate and screws (B).

    At postoperative 11 months, fused fourth and fifth carpometacarpal joint was confirmed in plain film (C).

    Tables

    Table 1
    Comparison of results between immediate fixation group and delayed reconstruction group of intra-articular metacarpal base fractures of the fourth through fifth metacarpals

    References

      1. Bushnell BD, Draeger RW, Crosby CG, Bynum DK. Management of intra-articular metacarpal base fractures of the second through fifth metacarpals. J Hand Surg Am 2008;33:573–583.
      1. Cain JE Jr, Shepler TR, Wilson MR. Hamatometacarpal fracture-dislocation: classification and treatment. J Hand Surg Am 1987;12:762–767.
      1. Choi JY, Shin HK, Son KM, Ko CS. Operative treatment in fracture-dislocations of carpometacarpal joints. J Korean Fract Soc 2005;18:443–451.
      1. Clendenin MB, Smith RJ. Fifth metacarpal/hamate arthrodesis for posttraumatic osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am 1984;9:374–378.
      1. El-Shennawy M, Nakamura K, Patterson RM, Viegas SF. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the second through fifth carpometacarpal joints. J Hand Surg Am 2001;26:1030–1035.
      1. Lane CS. Detecting occult fractures of the metacarpal head: the Brewerton view. J Hand Surg Am 1977;2:131–133.
      1. Liaw Y, Kalnins G, Kirsh G, Meakin I. Combined fourth and fifth metacarpal fracture and fifth carpometacarpal joint dislocation. J Hand Surg Br 1995;20:249–252.
      1. Lundeen JM, Shin AY. Clinical results of intraarticular fractures of the base of the fifth metacarpal treated by closed reduction and cast immobilization. J Hand Surg Br 2000;25:258–261.
      1. Niechajev I. Dislocated intra-articular fracture of the base of the fifth metacarpal: a clinical study of 23 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:406–410.
      1. Petrie PW, Lamb DW. Fracture-subluxation of base of fifth metacarpal. Hand 1974;6:82–86.
      1. Raven EE, Kerkhoffs GM, Rutten S, Marsman AJ, Marti RK, Albers GH. Long term results of surgical intervention for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint: comparison of resection arthroplasty, trapeziectomy with tendon interposition and trapezio-metacarpal arthrodesis. Int Orthop 2007;31:547–554.
      1. Schortinghuis J, Klasen HJ. Open reduction and internal fixation of combined fourth and fifth carpometacarpal (fracture) dislocations. J Trauma 1997;42:1052–1055.
      1. Viegas SF, Crossley M, Marzke M, Wullstein K. The fourth carpometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Am 1991;16:525–533.
      1. Yoon SW, Hwang TS, Park BG, Kim SD. Operative treatment of the tibial pilon fractures. J Korean Soc Fract 1999;12:621–631.
      1. Yoshida R, Shah MA, Patterson RM, Buford WL Jr, Knighten J, Viegas SF. Anatomy and pathomechanics of ring and small finger carpometacarpal joint injuries. J Hand Surg Am 2003;28:1035–1043.
    Cited by
    Crossref 1
    Google Scholar 
    MeSH Terms
    Carpometacarpal Joints
    Early Diagnosis
    Follow-Up Studies
    Hand Strength
    Intra-Articular Fractures
    Metacarpophalangeal Joint
    Range of Motion, Articular
    Retrospective Studies
    Metrics
    Share
    Figures
    slide
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 4

    Tables
    slide

    1 / 1

    PERMALINK