Published online Jan 31, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2008.21.1.1
Comparison Study of Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric Fixation with a Standard vs a Mini-incision
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the radiographic, clinical results between who had intertrochnateric fracture, treated with ITST with a standard or a mini-incision.
Materials and Methods
We selected each 20 patients of intertrochanteric fracture which were treated with ITST with a standard incision or a mini-incision from June 2004 to July 2006. We compared of mean operative time, transfusion doses and postoperative VAS score between two groups. We evaluated the radiographic results by follow-up radiography and the clinical results with the mobility score of Parker and Palmer and Salvati and Wilson hip function scoring system.
Results
Mean operative time, transfusion doses and postoperative VAS score were significantly less in the mini-incision there were 87.8 min., 2.0 pints and 4.2 for the standard group versus 40.3 min., 1.1 pints and 3.3 for the mini group. The radiographic results were not significantly different. Decrease of mobility score of Parker and Palmer and Salvati and Wilson hip function scoring system were similar.
Conclusion
Mini-incision significantly reduces operative time, transfusion doses and postoperative pain for fixation intertrochanteric fracture treated with ITST.
Fig. 1
Gross photography of ITST (intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric) intermedullary nail.
Fig. 2
(A) Standard incision.
(B) Mini-incision.
Fig. 3
Postoperative pain.
Table 1
Intra-, postoperative data of the two groups
Table 2
Comparison of radiologic results between the two groups
Table 3
Comparison of clinical results between the two groups
References
-
Ahn SJ, Park JH. Proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of the femoral trochanteric fracture. J Korean Fract Soc 2004;17:7–12.
-
-
Cummings SR, Rubin SM, Black D. The fracture of hip fractures in the unitied states. NUmbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;252:163–166.
-
-
Dominique CR, Pierre Y. Use of an intramedullary HIp-Screw Compared with a Compression hip-Screw with a Plate for Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures. A Prospective, Randomized Study of One Hundred patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:618–630.
-
-
Jacobs RR, McClain O, Armstrong HJ. Internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a clinical and biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;146:62–70.
-
-
Jung PH, Hwang JS, Kang S, Kwak JY. Comparative study of between intramedullary hip screw fixation group in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture. J Korean Hip Soc 2004;16:63–70.
-
-
Kyle RF, Cabanela ME, Russell TA, et al. Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. Instr Course Lect 1995;44:227–253.
-
-
Lee SY, Park IH, Song KW, Shin SI, Lee JY, Cha JH. The result of proximal femoral nailing (PFN(R)) for unstable femoral peritrochanteric fracture. J Korean Soc Fract 2003;16:143–147.
-
-
Melton LJ 3rd, Ilstrup DM, Riggs BL, Beckenbaugh RD. Fifty-year trend in hip fracture incidence. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982;162:144–149.
-
-
Moon DH, Choi JS, Kim GB, Kim JW, Kim KT. Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture with the AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail. J Korean Soc Fract 2003;16:136–142.
-
-
Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:797–798.
-
-
Salvati EA, Wilson PD Jr. Long-term results of femoral-head replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973;55:516–524.
-
-
Sohn OJ, Kim SD, Kim IW, Byun SJ. A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the Intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric fixation or the proximal femoral nail. J Korean Fract Soc 2006;19:303–308.
-
-
Thorngren KG. Optimal treatment of hip fractures. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1991;241 Suppl:31–34.
-