Strategies for Reducing Supplemental Medium Cost in Bioethanol Production from Waste House Wood Hydrolysate by Ethanologenic Escherichia coli: Inoculum Size Increase and Coculture with Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Section snippets
Microorganisms and media
Tryptone, yeast extract, and peptone were purchased from Becton, Dickinson and Company (Sparks, MD, USA). Chloramphenicol was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Other chemicals were purchased from Junsei Chemical (Tokyo). E. coli KO11, which was constructed by chromosomally integrating Zymomonas mobilis genes encoding pyruvate decarboxylase (pdc) and alcohol dehydrogenase II (adhB) and inactivating the pathway for succinate production (20), was supplied by Verenium Biofuel
Effect of CSL concentration on ethanol production by E. coli KO11
At first, to investigate the effect of CSL concentration on ethanol production by E. coli KO11 using the WHW hydrolysate medium, fermentation was conducted using the medium containing 1–4% CSL with 0.2 g-DCW/l E. coli KO11 as inoculum. As shown in Fig. 1, the xylose uptake ratio was 100%, and the overall ethanol yield reached 84% in the case of a CSL concentration of 4%. However, the xylose uptake ratio decreased to 40% when CSL concentration was 1%. The overall ethanol yield remained at 68% in
Discussion
Figure 5 shows the effect of generation number on volumetric ethanol production rate for various media containing E. coli KO11 and S. cerevisiae TJ1. For E. coli KO11 in 1%-CSL/hydrolysate medium, the volumetric ethanol production rate was approximately 0.4 g/(l·h) at the first generation; however, the rate decreased with an increase in the generation number, deteriorating to almost zero around the fifth to seventh generation. This indicates that treatment by overliming did not completely
References (22)
- et al.
Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates I: inhibition and detoxification
Bioresour. Technol.
(2000) - et al.
Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour
Technol.
(2000) - et al.
DNA microarray analysis of the expression of the genes encoding the major enzymes in ethanol production during glucose and xylose co-fermentation by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces yeast
Enzyme Microb. Technol.
(2003) - et al.
Kinetics of growth and ethanol production on different carbon substrates using genetically engineered xylose-fermenting yeast
Bioresour. Technol.
(2007) - et al.
Ethanol production from a mixture of glucose and xylose by co-culture of Pichia stipitis and a respiratory-deficient mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
(1997) - et al.
Ethanol production from a mixture of glucose and xylose by a novel co-culture system with two fermentors and two microfiltration modules
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
(1997) - et al.
Microaeration enhances productivity of bioethanol from hydrolysate of waste house wood using ethanologenic Escherichia coli KO11
J. Biosci. Bioeng.
(2007) - et al.
Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic enginneering and process integration
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
(2001) - et al.
Detoxification of dilute acid hydrolysates of lignocellulose with lime
Biotechnol. Prog.
(2001) - et al.
Relative rates of sugar utilization by an ethanologenic recombinant Escherichia coli using mixtures of glucose, mannose, and xylose
Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
(1994)
Fermentation of sugar mixtures using Escherichia coli catabolite repression mutants engineered for production of l-lactic acid
J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
Cited by (35)
Development of cell recycle technology incorporating nutrient supplementation for lignocellulosic ethanol fermentation using industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
2018, Biochemical Engineering JournalCitation Excerpt :In contrast, the addition of CSL significantly improved the performance of yeast cells during CRBF, probably owing to the supplementation of proteins, amino acids, minerals, and vitamins present in CSL [30]. Compared with the results of the estimation of Okuda et al. [29], where 1% CSL was the criterion for decreasing the production cost (i.e., setting the cost of CSL to less than 10 yen per liter of ethanol), the results in Fig. 3 further decreased the required CSL concentration (<0.125% CSL). However, in the case of the low CSL concentration, there are considerable differences in ethanol concentration among the lignocellulosic materials used.
Solid state fermentative lignocellulolytic enzymes production, characterization and its application in the saccharification of rice waste biomass for ethanol production: An integrated biotechnological approach
2017, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical EngineersCitation Excerpt :Yeast co-culture utilized glucose and xylose efficiently; however the utilization of arabinose from RWB hydrolysate still remains poor. Okuda et al. [32], reported increase in ethanol yield from waste-house wood hydrolysate fermenting with the co-cultures of Escherichia coli K011 and S. cerevisiae TJ1. Similarly co-cultures of S. cerevisiae VS3 and P. stipitis NCIM 3498 showed maximum ethanol yield from Saccharum spontaneum hydrolysates reported earlier [11].
In situ detoxification of dry dilute acid pretreated corn stover by co-culture of xylose-utilizing and inhibitor-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae increases ethanol production
2016, Bioresource TechnologyCitation Excerpt :Co-culture fermentation, which means the use of two or multiple microorganisms simultaneous in one single fermenter, was often applied to achieve efficient conversion of both glucose and xylose. These systems include co-culture of immobilized Z. mobilis and free cells of Scheffersomyces stipitis (Fu et al., 2009; Karagöz and Özkan, 2014), co-culture of ethanologenic E. coli KO11 with S. cerevisiae (Okuda et al., 2008), co-culture of Z. mobilis and Candida tropicalis for ethanol production from hydrolyzed agricultural wastes (Patle and Lal, 2007), and co-culture of S. cerevisiae and Pachysolen tannophilus (Sathesh-Prabu and Murugesan, 2011). Simultaneous consumption of glucose, xylose, and arabinose was achieved by a consortium of E. coli strains (Xia et al., 2012).
Development of sequential-co-culture system (Pichia stipitis and Zymomonas mobilis) for bioethanol production from Kans grass biomass
2014, Biochemical Engineering JournalCitation Excerpt :First approach relied on the use of recombinant microorganism developed with the aim to ferment both xylose and glucose to ethanol. These include genetically modified strains of S. cerevisiae, Z. mobilis, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella oxytoca [7–12]. Though the high yield could be achieved from these genetically modified organisms (GMO's), their developmental cost, narrow and neutral pH range, long term stability and the utilization of residual cell mass as animal feed [4] like other GRAS organisms are the main disadvantages which restrict the use of GMO's at industrial level.