Skip to main content
Log in

ASO Author Reflections: What Is the Future of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy?

  • ASO Author Reflections
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Yin S, Ma SN, Zhang YQ, et al. Surgical and oncological outcomes of an improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique: 6 years of experience at two centres. Surg Oncol. 2018;27:380–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hao M, Wang Z, Wei F, Wang J, Wang W, Ping Y. Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator in laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a pilot study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26:594–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu J, Ye T, Lv J, He Z, Zhu J. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and bladder dysfunction. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;26:417–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bogani G, Rossetti DO, Ditto A, et al. Nerve-sparing approach improves outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:402–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, Peters AA, Kenter GG. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11:180–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kato K, Suzuka K, Osaki T, Tanaka N. Unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique to preserve the pelvic autonomic nerves while increasing radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:1172–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oda Y, Todo Y, Hanley S, et al. Risk factors for persistent low bladder compliance after radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:167–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Contin P, Kulu Y, Bruckner T, et al. Comparative analysis of late functional outcome following preoperative radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery or surgery alone in rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:165–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li L, Ma S, Tan X, et al. The urodynamics and survival outcomes of different methods of dissecting the inferior hypogastric plexus in laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy of type C: a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:1560–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Wu MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This ASO Author Reflections is a brief invited commentary on the article “The Urodynamics and Survival Outcomes of Different Methods of Dissecting the Inferior Hypogastric Plexus in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy of Type C: a Randomized Controlled Study” Ann Surg Oncol. (2019) 26:1560–1568.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Wu, M. ASO Author Reflections: What Is the Future of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy?. Ann Surg Oncol 26 (Suppl 3), 662–663 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07661-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07661-9

Navigation