Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patterns of Referral for Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Study

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Reasons for variable utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for colon cancer have not been well described. We report medical oncology (MO) referral patterns and subsequent use of ACT.

Methods

Treatment records were linked to the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry to describe MO referral and ACT use among 5289 patients with stage II–III colon cancer treated in 2002–2008. Modified Poisson regression was used to analyze factors associated with MO referral and ACT use. Multilevel modeling was used to explore the proportion of variation in practice attributable to providers.

Results

There was wide geographic variation in MO referral rates for stage II (range 37–80 %, p < 0.001) and stage III disease (range 77–98 %, p < 0.001). Use of ACT among referred patients varied across regions for stage II (range 12–49 %, p < 0.001) but not stage III (range 67–79 %, p = 0.353). For both stages, younger patients (p < 0.001) with less comorbidity (p < 0.010) were more likely to be referred to MO and treated with ACT. Applying the fitted regression model to nonreferred stage III patients suggests that 38 % had >50 % probability of having ACT if they had seen a MO. Among stage III patients, 15 % percent of the variance in MO referral rate and 6 % of the variance in ACT utilization rate is attributable to the surgeon and MO respectively.

Conclusions

A substantial proportion of non-referred patients with stage III colon cancer may have been offered ACT if they had seen MO. A small proportion of variance in referral rate and ACT treatment is attributable to providers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 65:5-29, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD, et al.: Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(Suppl 6):vi64–vi72, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Guidelines Colon Cancer, 2015.

  4. Jonker DJ, Spithoff K, Maroun J: Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for Stage II and III colon cancer after complete resection: an updated practice guideline. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 23:314–322, 2011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chagpar R, Xing Y, Chiang YJ, et al.: Adherence to stage-specific treatment guidelines for patients with colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:972–979, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanoff HK, Carpenter WR, Sturmer T, et al.: Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival of patients with stage III colon cancer diagnosed after age 75 years. J Clin Oncol 30:2624–2634, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Winget M, Hossain S, Yasui Y, et al.: Characteristics of patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma who fail to receive guideline-recommended treatment. Cancer 116:4849–4856, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy CC, Harlan LC, Lund JL, et al.: Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Care in the United States: 1990–2010. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(10):djv198, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo R, Giordano SH, Freeman JL, et al.: Referral to medical oncology: a crucial step in the treatment of older patients with stage III colon cancer. Oncologist 11:1025–1033, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Luo R, Giordano SH, Zhang DD, et al.: The role of the surgeon in whether patients with lymph node-positive colon cancer see a medical oncologist. Cancer 109:975–982, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rayson D, Urquhart R, Cox M, et al.: Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in a Canadian province: a population-based analysis. J Oncol Pract 8:253–259, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Baldwin LM, Dobie SA, Billingsley K, et al.: Explaining black-white differences in receipt of recommended colon cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1211–1220, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davidoff AJ, Rapp T, Onukwugha E, et al.: Trends in disparities in receipt of adjuvant therapy for elderly stage III colon cancer patients: the role of the medical oncologist evaluation. Med Care 47:1229–1236, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke EA, Marrett LD, Krieger N: Cancer registration in Ontario: A computer approach., in Jenson OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R (eds): Cancer Registration Principles and Methods. Lyon,France, IARC, 1991, pp 246–257.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li X, King C, deGara C, et al.: Validation of colorectal cancer surgery data from administrative data sources. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:97, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mackillop WJ, Zhang-Salomons J, Groome PA, et al.: Socioeconomic status and cancer survival in Ontario. J Clin Oncol 15:1680–1689, 1997.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA: Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619, 1992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kankesan J, Shepherd FA, Peng Y, et al.: Factors associated with referral to medical oncology and subsequent use of adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a population-based study. Curr Oncol 20:30–37, 2013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Snijders T.A.B, Bosker RJ: Multilevel Analysis: An introduction to basic and advacned multilevel modelling. 2 ed. London: Sage Publishers, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mackillop WJ: Health services research in radiation oncology. In: Gunderson LL, Tepper JE, editors. Clinical radiation oncology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2012, p. 203–222.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Krzyzanowska MK, Regan MM, Powell M, et al.: Impact of patient age and comorbidity on surgeon versus oncologist preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. J Am Coll Surg 208:202–209, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Booth CM, Mackillop WJ: Translating new medical therapies into societal benefit: the role of population-based outcome studies. JAMA 300:2177–2179, 2008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES or the Ontario MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. Dr. Booth had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Dr. Booth is supported as a Canada Research Chair in Population Cancer Care. This work was supported by the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Disclaimer

Parts of this material are based on data and information provided by Cancer Care Ontario. However, the analysis, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Cancer Care Ontario.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher M. Booth MD.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 157 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandhoke, G., Wei, X., Nanji, S. et al. Patterns of Referral for Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Study. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 2529–2538 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5181-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5181-8

Keywords

Navigation