Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Cost Analysis of Preoperative Breast MRI Use for Patients with Invasive Lobular Cancer

  • Healthcare Policy and Outcomes
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Whereas the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast on the surgical management of breast cancer patients is well documented, less is known about its effect on health care costs. This study aimed to evaluate whether MRI use for women with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) significantly changes the cost of care.

Methods

Patients with ILC were recruited to a prospective registry study of breast MRI. Women who met the same inclusion criteria but had not undergone breast MRI were retrospectively identified for comparison. A micro-costing analysis using institutional billing records was conducted. Nonparametric bootstrapping was used to compare the unadjusted cost differences between the patients receiving MRI and those receiving no MRI.

Results

Of the patients in this study, 51 had preoperative MRI, and 60 did not. Method of diagnostic biopsy, disease stage, oncologic procedure, and rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy were similar between the two groups. The patients in the MRI group were younger (median age 55 vs. 64 years; p = 0.01) and more likely to undergo reconstruction (45.1 vs. 25 %; p = 0.03). The median costs of care were significantly higher in the MRI group ($24,781 vs. $18,921; p < 0.01). After adjustment for clinical factors, MRI remained significantly associated with increased cost (p = 0.03). Other factors associated with increased cost included type of oncologic procedure (mastectomy vs. lumpectomy; p < 0.01), number of operations required to achieve negative margins (1 vs. >1; p < 0.01), and use of reconstruction (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Preoperative breast MRI increases the median total cost of care per patient. However, the contribution to the overall cost of care is modest compared with the cost of other interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58. 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1295–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:110–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62070-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, Boughey JC, Loprinzi C, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8. 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4225.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Frick KD. Microcosting quantity data collection methods. Med Care. 2009;47:S76–81. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819bc064.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Doshi JA, Glick HA, Polsky D. Analyses of cost data in economic evaluations conducted alongside randomized controlled trials. Value Health. 2006;9:334–40. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00122.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdel-Rahman S, Le-Petross H, Whitman G, Meric-Bernstam F, Babiera G, et al. Paper presented at the society of surgical oncology 64th annual cancer symposiun, San, Antonio, 2011.

  10. Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, Muller SH, Wesseling J, Peterse JL, et al. The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:161–9. 10.1007/s10549-008-0182-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Parker A, Schroen AT, Brenin DR. MRI utilization in newly diagnosed breast cancer: a survey of practicing surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2600–6. 10.1245/s10434-013-2934-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stout NK, Nekhlyudov L, Li L, Malin ES, Ross-Degnan D, et al. Rapid increase in breast magnetic resonance imaging use: trends from 2000 to 2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:114–21. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11958.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wernli KJ, DeMartini WB, Ichikawa L, Lehman CD, Onega T, et al. Breast cancer surveillance: patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:125–32. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW, Smith A, Drew PJ. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:32–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel S, Schnall M, Reynolds C, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003;98:468–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, et al. Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1209–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Isabelle Bedrosian serves on the Bayer Breast MRI Advisory Board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Bedrosian MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bedrosian, I., Xing, Y., Abdel Rahman, S. et al. A Cost Analysis of Preoperative Breast MRI Use for Patients with Invasive Lobular Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 23–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4710-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4710-1

Keywords

Navigation