Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nodal Skip Metastasis is not a Predictor of Survival in Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The presence of nodal skip metastasis (NSM) has been found to be of clinical importance in non-small cell lung cancer, but the study of this phenomenon in esophageal carcinoma is relatively rare. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors influencing NSM and to assess its prognostic value in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

A total of 207 patients with thoracic ESCC who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy and who had lymph node metastasis were reviewed. Associations of NSM occurrence with the clinicopathological characteristics of patients and primary tumors were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. The influence of NSM on the overall survival (OS) was assessed by log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis.

Results

NSM were present in 58 (26 %) patients. No factor was significantly associated with the incidence of NSM except for the location of primary tumor. There were no NSMs in the 29 patients from our study with upper thoracic ESCC, and the rates of tumors occurrence in the middle and lower third of the esophagus were 38.9 and 14.9 %, respectively. The median OS was 30 months, and no significant difference in OS was found between the patients with or without NSM (p = 0.767). Only N status was found to be the independent risk factor for OS by Cox multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

NSM is common in thoracic ESCC, especially in patients with tumors located in the middle and lower third of the esophagus. However, the presence of NSM did not predict prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. American joint committee on cancer (AJCC) cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Chicago: Springer; 2010:67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Hirahara N, Yoshimura H. Lymph node classification of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:427–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Riquet M, Assouad J, Bagan P, Foucault C, Le Pimpec Barthes F, Dujon A, Danel C. Skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis and lung cancer: a particular N2 subgroup with a better prognosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:225–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakagiri T, Sawabata N, Funaki S, Inoue M, Kadota Y, Shintani Y, Okumura M. Validation of pN2 sub-classifications in patients with pathological stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:733–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim YC, Koo BS. Predictive factors of skip metastases to lateral neck compartment leaping central neck compartment in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2012;4:262–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee SE, Lee JH, Ryu KW, et al. Sentinel node mapping and skip metastases in patients with early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:603–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keskek M, Balas S, Gokoz A, Sayek I. Re-evaluation of axillary skip metastases in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Surg Today. 2006;36:1047–1052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li H, Zhang Y, Cai H, Xiang J. Pattern of lymph node metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy. Eur Surg Res. 2007;39:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li H, Yang S, Zhang Y, Xiang J, Chen H. Thoracic recurrent laryngeal lymph node metastases predict cervical node metastases and benefit from three-field dissection in selected patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:548–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases: Guidelines for the clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus. Jpn J Surg. 1976;6:69–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Prenzel KL, Bollschweiler E, Schröder W, Mönig SP, Drebber U, Vallboehmer D, Hölscher AH. Prognostic relevance of skip metastases in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1662–1667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hosch SB, Stoecklein NH, Pichlmeier U, et al. Esophageal cancer: the mode of lymphatic tumor cell spread and its prognostic significance. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1970–1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu QR, Zhuge XP, Zhang HL, Ping YM, Chen LQ. The N-classification for esophageal cancer staging: should it be based on number, distance, or extent of the lymph node metastasis? World J Surg. 2011;35:1303–1310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Skandalakis JE, Ellis H. Embryologic and anatomic basis of esophageal surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80:85–155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Takeuchi H, Fujii H, Ando N, et al. Validation study of radio-guided sentinel lymph node navigation in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249:757–763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim HK, Kim S, Park JJ, Jeong JM, Mok YJ, Choi YH. Sentinel node identification using technetium-99m neomannosyl human serum albumin in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1517–1522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen J, Liu S, Pan J, et al. The pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:480–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Groth SS, Virnig BA, Whitson BA, DeFor TE, Li ZZ, Tuttle TM, Maddaus MA. Determination of the minimum number of LNs to examine to maximize survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:612–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Esophageal Cancer Version v.2.2012. Available: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/esophageal.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2012.

  22. Gusterson B, Ott R. Occult axillary lymph-node micrometastases in breast cancer. Lancet. 1990;336:434–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yekebas EF, Schurr PG, Kaifi JT, et al. Effectiveness of radical en bloc esophagectomy compared to transhiatal esophagectomy in squamous cell cancer of the esophagus is influenced by nodal micrometastases. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:541–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Izbicki JR, Hosch SB, Pichlmeier U, et al. Prognostic value of immunohistochemically identifiable tumor cells in LNs of patients with completely resected esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1188–1194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Financial Support

There’s no specific funding support this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiaqing Xiang MD or Xiaolong Fu MD.

Additional information

Zhengfei Zhu and Weiwei Yu contributed equally to this study and both should be considered first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, Z., Yu, W., Li, H. et al. Nodal Skip Metastasis is not a Predictor of Survival in Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 3052–3058 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2987-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2987-5

Keywords

Navigation