Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Value of Preoperative Imaging in Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

  • Endocrine Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowel (SBNETs) are a rare but important subgroup of malignancies. Since 30 % of SBNETs present with metastatic disease, often with an occult primary, preoperative imaging is critical for determining who will benefit most from abdominal exploration. We set out to evaluate the usefulness of the two most commonly performed imaging modalities in predicting the extent of disease found at exploration in patients with SBNETs.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with SBNETs resected at 1 institution. Data from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed to determine whether the primary tumor, nodal, or liver metastases were seen, then compared with intraoperative findings. Results of preoperative somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) were similarly examined.

Results

A total of 62 patients with SBNETs were included. Of these patients, 42 of 62 (68 %) had distant metastases and 48 of 62 (77 %) had nodal metastases at exploration. A total of 56 patients had preoperative CT scans and 47 had SRS. Using CT, a primary tumor was localized to the small bowel in 27 of 56 (48 %) and nodal metastases seen in 33 of 56 (79 %) of cases. SRS found intra-abdominal uptake in 35 of 47 cases (74 %).

Conclusions

CT and SRS are complementary in making the diagnosis of SBNET, with CT giving more precise anatomical detail, while SRS helps to confirm that lesions are NETs and is useful for identifying occult extrahepatic sites of metastatic disease. However, 10–15 % of SBNETs were not identified by either test preoperatively, and therefore surgical exploration still plays an important role in making the diagnosis in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer. 2003;97:934–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, Dagohoy C, Leary C, Mares JE, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Modlin IM, Kidd M, Latich I, Zikusoka MN, Shapiro MD. Current status of gastrointestinal carcinoids. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1717–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dahdaleh FS, Calva-Cerqueira D, Carr JC, Liao J, Mezhir JJ, O’Dorisio TM, et al. Comparison of clinicopathologic factors in 122 patients with resected pancreatic and ileal neuroendocrine tumors from a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:966–972.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hellman P, Lundstrom T, Ohrvall U, Eriksson B, Skogseid B, Oberg K, et al. Effect of surgery on the outcome of midgut carcinoid disease with lymph node and liver metastases. World J Surg. 2002;26:991–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Givi B, Pommier SJ, Thompson AK, Diggs BS, Pommier RF. Operative resection of primary carcinoid neoplasms in patients with liver metastases yields significantly better survival. Surgery. 2006;140:891–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boudreaux JP, Klimstra DS, Hassan MM, Woltering EA, Jensen RT, Goldsmith SJ, et al. The NANETS consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the jejunum, ileum, appendix, and cecum. Pancreas. 2010;39:753–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reubi JC. Regulatory peptide receptors as molecular targets for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Q J Nucl Med. 1997;41:63–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Krenning EP, Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH, Breeman WA, Kooij PP, Oei HY, et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]- and [123I-Tyr3]-octreotide: the Rotterdam experience with more than 1000 patients. Eur J Nucl Med. 1993;20:716–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Horton KM, Kamel I, Hofmann L, Fishman EK. Carcinoid tumors of the small bowel: a multitechnique imaging approach. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:559–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oberndorfer S. Karzinoide Tumoren des Dünndarms. Frankf Z Pathol. 1907;1:426–32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scholte A. Ein fall von angioma telangiectaticum cutis mit chronischer endocarditis und malignem dünndarmcarcinoid. Beitr Pathol Anat. 1931;86:440–3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Page IH. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine). Physiol Rev. 1954;34:563–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Haverback BJ, Sjoerdsma A, Terry LL. Urinary excretion of the serotonin metabolite, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, in various clinical conditions. N Engl J Med. 1956;255:270–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol. 1973;46:1016–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwekkeboom DJ, Kam BL, van Essen M, Teunissen JJ, van Eijck CH, Valkema R, et al. Somatostatin-receptor-based imaging and therapy of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endoc Relat Cancer. 2010;17:R53–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lugtenburg PJ, Krenning EP, Valkema R, Oei HY, Lamberts SW, Eijkemans MJ, et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy useful in stage I–II Hodgkin’s disease: more extended disease identified. Br J Haematol. 2001;112:936–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Raderer M, Kurtaran A, Leimer M, Angelberger P, Niederle B, Vierhapper H, et al. Value of peptide receptor scintigraphy using (123)I-vasoactive intestinal peptide and (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe1-octreotide in 194 carcinoid patients: Vienna University experience, 1993 to 1998. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1331–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi W, Johnston CF, Buchanan KD, Ferguson WR, Laird JD, Crothers JG, et al. Localization of neuroendocrine tumours with [111In] DTPA-octreotide scintigraphy (octreoscan): a comparative study with CT and MR imaging. Q J Math. 1998;91:295–301.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chambers AJ, Pasieka JL, Dixon E, Rorstad O. Role of imaging in the preoperative staging of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:620–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Orlefors H, Sundin A, Garske U, Juhlin C, Oberg K, Skogseid B, et al. Whole-body (11)C-5-hydroxytryptophan positron emission tomography as a universal imaging technique for neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and computed tomography. J Clin Endocr Metab. 2005;90:3392–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hofmann M, Maecke H, Borner R, Weckesser E, Schoffski P, Oei L, et al. Biokinetics and imaging with the somatostatin receptor PET radioligand (68)Ga-DOTATOC: preliminary data. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1751–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kowalski J, Henze M, Schuhmacher J, Macke HR, Hofmann M, Haberkorn U. Evaluation of positron emission tomography imaging using [68Ga]-DOTA-D Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide in comparison to [111In]-DTPAOC SPECT. First results in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Mol Imaging Biol. 2003;5:42–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gabriel M, Decristoforo C, Kendler D, Dobrozemsky G, Heute D, Uprimny C, et al. 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:508–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Naswa N, Sharma P, Kumar A, Nazar AH, Kumar R, Chumber S, et al. Gallium-68-DOTA-NOC PET/CT of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective single-center study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1221–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James R. Howe MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahdaleh, F.S., Lorenzen, A., Rajput, M. et al. The Value of Preoperative Imaging in Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 1912–1917 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2836-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2836-y

Keywords

Navigation