Abstract
Background
Neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowel (SBNETs) are a rare but important subgroup of malignancies. Since 30 % of SBNETs present with metastatic disease, often with an occult primary, preoperative imaging is critical for determining who will benefit most from abdominal exploration. We set out to evaluate the usefulness of the two most commonly performed imaging modalities in predicting the extent of disease found at exploration in patients with SBNETs.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with SBNETs resected at 1 institution. Data from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed to determine whether the primary tumor, nodal, or liver metastases were seen, then compared with intraoperative findings. Results of preoperative somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) were similarly examined.
Results
A total of 62 patients with SBNETs were included. Of these patients, 42 of 62 (68 %) had distant metastases and 48 of 62 (77 %) had nodal metastases at exploration. A total of 56 patients had preoperative CT scans and 47 had SRS. Using CT, a primary tumor was localized to the small bowel in 27 of 56 (48 %) and nodal metastases seen in 33 of 56 (79 %) of cases. SRS found intra-abdominal uptake in 35 of 47 cases (74 %).
Conclusions
CT and SRS are complementary in making the diagnosis of SBNET, with CT giving more precise anatomical detail, while SRS helps to confirm that lesions are NETs and is useful for identifying occult extrahepatic sites of metastatic disease. However, 10–15 % of SBNETs were not identified by either test preoperatively, and therefore surgical exploration still plays an important role in making the diagnosis in these patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer. 2003;97:934–59.
Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, Dagohoy C, Leary C, Mares JE, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–72.
Modlin IM, Kidd M, Latich I, Zikusoka MN, Shapiro MD. Current status of gastrointestinal carcinoids. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1717–51.
Dahdaleh FS, Calva-Cerqueira D, Carr JC, Liao J, Mezhir JJ, O’Dorisio TM, et al. Comparison of clinicopathologic factors in 122 patients with resected pancreatic and ileal neuroendocrine tumors from a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:966–972.
Hellman P, Lundstrom T, Ohrvall U, Eriksson B, Skogseid B, Oberg K, et al. Effect of surgery on the outcome of midgut carcinoid disease with lymph node and liver metastases. World J Surg. 2002;26:991–7.
Givi B, Pommier SJ, Thompson AK, Diggs BS, Pommier RF. Operative resection of primary carcinoid neoplasms in patients with liver metastases yields significantly better survival. Surgery. 2006;140:891–7.
Boudreaux JP, Klimstra DS, Hassan MM, Woltering EA, Jensen RT, Goldsmith SJ, et al. The NANETS consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the jejunum, ileum, appendix, and cecum. Pancreas. 2010;39:753–66.
Reubi JC. Regulatory peptide receptors as molecular targets for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Q J Nucl Med. 1997;41:63–70.
Krenning EP, Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH, Breeman WA, Kooij PP, Oei HY, et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]- and [123I-Tyr3]-octreotide: the Rotterdam experience with more than 1000 patients. Eur J Nucl Med. 1993;20:716–31.
Horton KM, Kamel I, Hofmann L, Fishman EK. Carcinoid tumors of the small bowel: a multitechnique imaging approach. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:559–67.
Oberndorfer S. Karzinoide Tumoren des Dünndarms. Frankf Z Pathol. 1907;1:426–32.
Scholte A. Ein fall von angioma telangiectaticum cutis mit chronischer endocarditis und malignem dünndarmcarcinoid. Beitr Pathol Anat. 1931;86:440–3.
Page IH. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine). Physiol Rev. 1954;34:563–88.
Haverback BJ, Sjoerdsma A, Terry LL. Urinary excretion of the serotonin metabolite, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, in various clinical conditions. N Engl J Med. 1956;255:270–2.
Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol. 1973;46:1016–22.
Kwekkeboom DJ, Kam BL, van Essen M, Teunissen JJ, van Eijck CH, Valkema R, et al. Somatostatin-receptor-based imaging and therapy of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endoc Relat Cancer. 2010;17:R53–73.
Lugtenburg PJ, Krenning EP, Valkema R, Oei HY, Lamberts SW, Eijkemans MJ, et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy useful in stage I–II Hodgkin’s disease: more extended disease identified. Br J Haematol. 2001;112:936–44.
Raderer M, Kurtaran A, Leimer M, Angelberger P, Niederle B, Vierhapper H, et al. Value of peptide receptor scintigraphy using (123)I-vasoactive intestinal peptide and (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe1-octreotide in 194 carcinoid patients: Vienna University experience, 1993 to 1998. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1331–6.
Shi W, Johnston CF, Buchanan KD, Ferguson WR, Laird JD, Crothers JG, et al. Localization of neuroendocrine tumours with [111In] DTPA-octreotide scintigraphy (octreoscan): a comparative study with CT and MR imaging. Q J Math. 1998;91:295–301.
Chambers AJ, Pasieka JL, Dixon E, Rorstad O. Role of imaging in the preoperative staging of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:620–7.
Orlefors H, Sundin A, Garske U, Juhlin C, Oberg K, Skogseid B, et al. Whole-body (11)C-5-hydroxytryptophan positron emission tomography as a universal imaging technique for neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and computed tomography. J Clin Endocr Metab. 2005;90:3392–400.
Hofmann M, Maecke H, Borner R, Weckesser E, Schoffski P, Oei L, et al. Biokinetics and imaging with the somatostatin receptor PET radioligand (68)Ga-DOTATOC: preliminary data. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1751–7.
Kowalski J, Henze M, Schuhmacher J, Macke HR, Hofmann M, Haberkorn U. Evaluation of positron emission tomography imaging using [68Ga]-DOTA-D Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide in comparison to [111In]-DTPAOC SPECT. First results in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Mol Imaging Biol. 2003;5:42–8.
Gabriel M, Decristoforo C, Kendler D, Dobrozemsky G, Heute D, Uprimny C, et al. 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:508–18.
Naswa N, Sharma P, Kumar A, Nazar AH, Kumar R, Chumber S, et al. Gallium-68-DOTA-NOC PET/CT of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective single-center study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1221–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dahdaleh, F.S., Lorenzen, A., Rajput, M. et al. The Value of Preoperative Imaging in Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 1912–1917 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2836-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2836-y