Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Microsatellite-Unstable Colorectal Carcinomas Depend on L1 Methylation Level

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The prognostic significance of microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancers (CRCs) has been addressed in many studies since the initial description of better survival rates in MSI-positive (MSI+) tumors than in MSI-negative (MSI−) tumors. Recent studies have demonstrated that a higher degree of hypomethylation of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (L1) is related to poor prognosis of CRCs and that a wide variation of L1 methylation levels exist within MSI+ CRCs. Our aim was to identify whether L1 and Alu methylation status could predict clinical outcomes within MSI+ CRCs.

Methods

We analyzed 207 MSI+ CRCs for their methylation levels in L1 and Alu repetitive DNA elements using pyrosequencing and correlated them with clinicopathological information including survival data.

Results

Univariate survival analysis showed that low Alu methylation status (<18.60 %) and low L1 methylation status (<53.00 %) were significantly associated with shorter overall survival time (log-rank test, P = 0.009 and P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis using nine parameters (Alu methylation status, L1 methylation status, patient’s age, disease stage [tumor, node, metastasis staging system], differentiation, Crohn-like lymphoid reaction, KRAS/BRAF mutation status, CpG island methylator phenotype [CIMP] status, and peritumoral lymphocytic infiltration), which were significantly prognostic in MSI+ CRCs, revealed that low L1 methylation status was an independent prognostic factor of MSI+ CRCs (P = 0.009), whereas low Alu methylation status was not.

Conclusions

Clinical outcomes of MSI+ CRCs depend on L1 methylation status, suggesting that lower L1 methylation status serves as a significant prognostic parameter of adverse prognosis in MSI+ CRCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sung JJ, Lau JY, Goh KL, Leung WK. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Asia: implications for screening. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:871–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boland CR, Goel A. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2073–87, e2073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Poynter JN, Siegmund KD, Weisenberger DJ, et al. Molecular characterization of MSI-H colorectal cancer by MLHI promoter methylation, immunohistochemistry, and mismatch repair germline mutation screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:3208–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Samowitz WS, Curtin K, Ma KN, et al. Microsatellite instability in sporadic colon cancer is associated with an improved prognosis at the population level. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:917–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bae JM, Kim MJ, Kim JH, et al. Differential clinicopathological features in microsatellite instability–positive colorectal cancers depending on CIMP status. Virchows Arch. 2011;459:55–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JH, Shin SH, Kwon HJ, Cho NY, Kang GH. Prognostic implications of CpG island hypermethylator phenotype in colorectal cancers. Virchows Arch. 2009;455:485–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahn JB, Chung WB, Maeda O, et al. DNA methylation predicts recurrence from resected stage III proximal colon cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:1847–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang GH. Four molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer and their precursor lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:698–703.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Soreide K, Janssen EA, Soiland H, Korner H, Baak JP. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:395–406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thibodeau SN, Bren G, Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science. 1993;260:816–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Benatti P, Gafa R, Barana D, et al. Microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:8332–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guidoboni M, Gafa R, Viel A, et al. Microsatellite instability and high content of activated cytotoxic lymphocytes identify colon cancer patients with a favorable prognosis. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:297–304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Popat S, Hubner R, Houlston RS. Systematic review of microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:609–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guastadisegni C, Colafranceschi M, Ottini L, Dogliotti E. Microsatellite instability as a marker of prognosis and response to therapy: a meta-analysis of colorectal cancer survival data. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:2788–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boland CR. Clinical uses of microsatellite instability testing in colorectal cancer: an ongoing challenge. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:754–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim GP, Colangelo LH, Wieand HS, et al. Prognostic and predictive roles of high-degree microsatellite instability in colon cancer: a National Cancer Institute–National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Collaborative Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:767–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001;409:860–921.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cordaux R, Batzer MA. The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:691–703.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoder JA, Walsh CP, Bestor TH. Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet. 1997;13:335–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ehrlich M. DNA methylation in cancer: too much, but also too little. Oncogene. 2002;21:5400–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weisenberger DJ, Campan M, Long TI, et al. Analysis of repetitive element DNA methylation by MethyLight. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:6823–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Baba Y, Huttenhower C, Nosho K, et al. Epigenomic diversity of colorectal cancer indicated by LINE-1 methylation in a database of 869 tumors. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ogino S, Nosho K, Kirkner GJ, et al. A cohort study of tumoral LINE-1 hypomethylation and prognosis in colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1734–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Nosho K, et al. LINE-1 hypomethylation is inversely associated with microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:2767–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Estecio MR, Gharibyan V, Shen L, et al. LINE-1 hypomethylation in cancer is highly variable and inversely correlated with microsatellite instability. PLoS One. 2007;2:e399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee S, Cho NY, Choi M, Yoo EJ, Kim JH, Kang GH. Clinicopathological features of CpG island methylator phenotype–positive colorectal cancer and its adverse prognosis in relation to KRAS/BRAF mutation. Pathol Int. 2008;58:104–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee S, Cho NY, Yoo EJ, Kim JH, Kang GH. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancers: comparison of the new and classic CpG island methylator phenotype marker panels. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:1657–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tellez CS, Shen L, Estecio MR, Jelinek J, Gershenwald JE, Issa JP. CpG island methylation profiling in human melanoma cell lines. Melanoma Res. 2009;19:146–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pobsook T, Subbalekha K, Sannikorn P, Mutirangura A. Improved measurement of LINE-1 sequence methylation for cancer detection. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:314–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kitkumthorn N, Mutirangura A. Long interspersed nuclear element-1 hypomethylation in cancer: biology and clinical applications. Clin Epigenet. 2011;1–16.

  31. Brena RM, Auer H, Kornacker K, et al. Accurate quantification of DNA methylation using combined bisulfite restriction analysis coupled with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:e17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Irahara N, Nosho K, Baba Y, et al. Precision of pyrosequencing assay to measure LINE-1 methylation in colon cancer, normal colonic mucosa, and peripheral blood cells. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12:177–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sunami E, de Maat M, Vu A, Turner RR, Hoon DS. LINE-1 hypomethylation during primary colon cancer progression. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18884.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by a grant from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (0720540), by a grant from the Seoul National University Hospital Research Fund (0320110220), by A3 Foresight Program from National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), and by a Mid-career Researcher Program through NRF grant funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (2011-0015646).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyeong Hoon Kang MD.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rhee, YY., Kim, M.J., Bae, J.M. et al. Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Microsatellite-Unstable Colorectal Carcinomas Depend on L1 Methylation Level. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 3441–3448 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2410-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2410-7

Keywords

Navigation