References
Hall C, Krishnamurthy S, Lodhi A, et al. Disseminated tumor cells in biologic subtypes of stage I-III breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-1160-7.
Listrom MB, and Dalton LW. Comparison of keratin monoclonal antibodies MAK-6, AE1: AE3 and CAM5.2. Am J Clin Pathol. 1987;88(3):297–300.
Aden C, Reynold SC, Adlakha H, et al. Wide spectrum screening keratins as a marker of metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma of the breast: an immunohistochemical study of 24 patients. Histopathology. 2002;40(6):556–62.
Namikawa T, Kobayashi M, Iwabu J, et al. Primary undifferentiated carcinoma of small intestine: an immunohistochemical study and review of the literature. Med Mol Morphol. 2010;42(2):91–5.
Tamas EF, Epstein JI. Detection of residual tumor cells in bladder biopsy specimen: pitfalls in the interpretation of cytokeratin stain. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(3):390–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krishnamurthy, S., Lucci, A. Anti-cytokeratin CAM5.2 (BD Sciences) and CK8 Give No Remarkable Advantages to the Pancytokeratin Cocktail of Antibodies (AE1/AE3, CAM5.2, MNF116, CK8, and CK18) in Detecting Disseminated Tumor Cells in Biologic Subtypes of Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 18 (Suppl 3), 263–264 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1421-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1421-5