Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Can Breast MRI Predict Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Women Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Axillary lymph node status provides important staging information. We sought to evaluate the predictive value of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting axillary lymph node metastases prior to initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and in detecting residual lymph node metastases after NAC in women found to be node positive prior to NAC.

Methods

Women underwent breast MRI with axillary evaluation prior to initiation of NAC and again after completion of NAC. Pathologic confirmation of lymph node status was confirmed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), image-guided axillary fine-needle aspiration (FNA)/core biopsy, or axillary lymph node dissection. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of MRI in detecting axillary node involvement.

Results

Seventy-four women completed NAC and underwent surgery. Sensitivity of MRI in detecting axillary node involvement prior to NAC was 64.7% and specificity was 100%, with positive and negative predictive values of MRI of 100% and 77.8%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI to identify residual pathologic axillary lymph node disease following NAC were 85.7% and 89%, respectively, while the positive and negative predictive values were 92% and 80.9%, respectively.

Conclusion

Breast MRI has moderate sensitivity and high specificity for predicting axillary lymph node status prior to NAC. In patients found to be node positive prior to NAC, MRI was able to predict with moderate sensitivity and specificity whether residual nodal disease was present. The accuracy of MRI is not adequate to obviate either the need for staging by sentinel node biopsy or the need for completion axillary dissection in women determined to be node positive prior to NAC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:546–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin RC 2nd, Chagpar A, Scoggins CR, Edwards MJ, Hagendoorn L, Stromberg AJ, et al.; University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study. Clinicopathologic factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph-node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2005;241:1005–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Purushotham AD, Upponi S, Klevesath MB, et al. Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4312–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crane-Okada R, Wascher RA, Elashoff D, Giuliano AE. Long-term morbidity of sentinel node biopsy versus complete axillary dissection for unilateral breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1996–2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Del Bianco P, Zavagno G, Burelli P, et al. Morbidity comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus conventional axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients: results of the setinella-GIVOM Italian randomized clinical trial. EJSO. 2007;34:508–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Olson JA Jr, McCall LM, Beitsch P, et al. Impact of immediate versus delayed axillary node dissection on surgical outcomes in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel nodes: results from American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trials Z0010 and Z0011. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3530–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ueda S, Tsuda H, Asakawa H, Omata J, Fukatsu K, Kondo N, et al. Utility of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in combination with ultrasonography for axillary staging in primary breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahoo S, Sanders MA, Roland L, Pile N, Chagpar AB. A strategic approach to the evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients: analysis of 168 patients at a single institution. Am J Surg. 2007;194:524–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alvarez S, Añorbe E, Alcorta P, López F, Alonso I, Cortés J. Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a systematic review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1342–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Specht MC, Fey JV, Borgen PI, Cody HS 3rd. Is the clinically positive axilla in breast cancer really a contraindication to sentinel lymph node biopsy? J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:10–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilke LG, McCall LM, Posther KE, Whitworth PW, Reintgen DS, Leitch AM, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:491–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xing Y, Foy M, Cox DD, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, Cormier JN. Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:539–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buchholz TA, Lehman CD, Harris JR, Pockaj BA, Khouri N, Hylton NF, et al. Statement of the science concerning locoregional treatments after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer: a National Cancer Institute conference. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:791–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;112:461–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhattacharyya M, Ryan D, Carpenter R, Vinnicombe S, Gallagher CJ. Using MRI to plan breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:289–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rieber A, Brambs HJ, Gabelmann A, Heilmann V, Kreienberg R, Kuhn T. Breast MRI for monitoring response of primary breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1711–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martincich L, Montemurro F, De Rosa G, et al. Monitoring response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;83:67–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeh E, Slanetz P, Kopans DB, et al. Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:868–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Segara D, Krop IE, Garber JE, Winer E, Harris L, Bellon JR, et al. Does MRI predict pathologic tumor response in women with breast cancer undergoing preoperative chemotherapy? J Surg Oncol. 2007;96(6):474–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsiang DJ, Yamamoto M, Mehta RS, Su MY, Baick CH, Lane KT, et al. Predicting nodal status using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with and without sequential trastuzumab. Arch Surg. 2007;142(9):855–61; discussion 860–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harada T, Tanigawa N, Matsuki M, Nohara T, Narabayashi I. Evaluation of lymph node metastases of breast cancer using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2007;63:401–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T, et al. Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR. 1997;169:417–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Luciani A, Ha Dao, T, Lapeyre M, Schwarzinger M, Debaecque C, Lantieri L, et al. Simultaneous bilateral breast and high-resolution axillary MRI of patients with breast cancer: preliminary results. AJR. 2004;182:1059–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mortellaro VE, Marshall J, Singer L, Hochwald SN, Chang M, Copeland EM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for axillary staging in patients with breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:309–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Krishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Bedi DG, Edieken BS, Fornage BD, Kuerer HM, et al. Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;95(5):982–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. de Boer M, van Deurzen CH, van Dijck JA, Borm GF, van Diest PJ, Adang EM, et al. Micrometastases or isolated tumor cells and the outcome of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(7):653–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Michel SC, Keller TM, Frohlich JM, Fink D, Caduff R, Seifert B, et al. Preoperative breast cancer staging: MR imaging of the axilla with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide enhancement. Radiology. 2002;225:527–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

    Sara Javid, Davendra Segara & Mehra Golshan

  2. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Faulkner Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

    Parisa Lotfi

  3. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

    Sughra Raza

Authors
  1. Sara Javid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Davendra Segara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Parisa Lotfi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sughra Raza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mehra Golshan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehra Golshan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Javid, S., Segara, D., Lotfi, P. et al. Can Breast MRI Predict Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Women Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 17, 1841–1846 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0934-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0934-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation