Abstarct
Background
Hemipelvectomy has high wound complication rates. This study aimed to determine variables that may influence hemipelvectomy wound morbidity.
Methods
The records of 160 consecutive hemipelvectomy patients were reviewed with a focus on demographics, treatment, and surgical techniques. Multivariate analysis was used to determine risk factors for postoperative hemipelvectomy wound infection and flap necrosis.
Results
There were 31 standard, 62 modified, and 67 extended hemipelvectomy patients in whom 19 contiguous visceral, 62 spinal, 4 contralateral pelvic resections, and 1 contralateral hemipelvectomy were performed. Hospital mortality rate was 5%, and overall morbidity was 54%. Wound complications such as infection (39%) and flap necrosis (26%) were the most common. For modified, standard, and extended hemipelvectomies, rates of wound infection were 29%, 34%, and 51% (P = .036) and rates of flap necrosis were 16%, 25%, and 35% (P = .046), respectively. Longer operative time and increased complexity were associated with higher wound infection and flap necrosis rates. The hemipelvectomy flap design did not influence the frequency of wound infection (P = .173) or flap necrosis (P = .098). Common iliac vessel ligation was the most statistically significant predictor of flap necrosis and was associated with the 2.7-fold increase in flap necrosis rate (P = .001) in patients undergoing posterior flap hemipelvectomy.
Conclusions
External hemipelvectomy has low mortality but high morbidity. Postoperative wound infection and flap necrosis are multifactorial events related to length and extent of operation. Level of vascular ligation strongly influenced flap necrosis rate for posterior flap hemipelvectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Higinbotham NL, Marcove RC, Casson P. Hemipelvectomy: a clinical study of 100 cases with five-year-follow-up on 60 patients. Surgery 1966; 59:706–8
Douglass HO Jr, Razack M, Holyoke ED. Hemipelvectomy. Arch Surg 1975; 110:82–5
American Society of Anesthesiologist. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963; 24:111
Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978; 49:239–43
Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991; 91:152S–7S
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159–74
Miller TR. 100 cases of hemipelvectomy: a personal experience. Surg Clin North Am 1974; 54:905–13
Karakousis CP, Emrich LJ, Driscoll DL. Variants of hemipelvectomy and their complications. Am J Surg 1989; 158:404–8
Prewitt TW, Alexander HR, Sindelar WF. Hemipelvectomy for soft tissue sarcoma: clinical results in fifty-three patients. Surg Oncol 1995; 4:261–9
King D, Steelquist J. Transiliac amputation. J Bone Joint Surg 1943; 25:352–67
Temple WJ, Mnaymneh W, Ketcham AS. The total thigh and rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for closure of extensive hemipelvectomy defects. Cancer 1982; 50:2524–8
Malawer MM, Sugarbaker PH. Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery. Vol 1. Dordrecht: luwer Academic Publishers, 2001
Bowden L, Booher RJ. Surgical considerations in the treatment of sarcoma of the buttock. Cancer 1953; 6:89–99
Frey C, Matthews LS, Benjamin H, Fidler WJ. A new technique for hemipelvectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976; 143:753–6
Mnaymneh W, Temple W. Modified hemipelvectomy utilizing a long vascular myocutaneous thigh flap. Case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62:1013–5
Georgiade N, Pickrell K, Maguire C. Total thigh flaps for extensive decubitus ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg 1956; 17:220–5
Kulaylat MN, Froix A, Karakousis CP. Blood supply of hemipelvectomy flaps: the anterior flap hemipelvectomy. Arch Surg 2001; 136:828–31
Karakousis CP, Vezeridis MP. Variants of hemipelvectomy. Am J Surg 1983; 145:273–7
Apffelstaedt JP, Zhang PJ, Driscoll DL, Karakousis CP. Various types of hemipelvectomy for soft tissue sarcomas: complications, survival and prognostic factors. Surg Oncol 1995; 4:217–22
Apffelstaedt JP, Driscoll DL, Spellman JE, et al. Complications and outcome of external hemipelvectomy in the management of pelvic tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 1996; 3:304–9
Karakousis CP. The abdominoinguinal incision: the equivalent of thoracoabdominal incision for the lower quadrants of the abdomen. J Surg Oncol 1998; 69:249–57
Karakousis CP. Abdominoinguinal incision and other incisions in the resection of pelvic tumors. Surg Oncol 2000; 9:83–90
Caceres E, Leon L. Modified hemipelvectomy. J Surg Oncol 1999; 71:66–7
Workman ML, Bailey DF, Cunningham BL. Popliteal-based filleted lower leg musculocutaneous free-flap coverage of a hemipelvectomy defect. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89:326–9
Yamamoto Y, Minakawa H, Takeda N. Pelvic reconstruction with a free fillet lower leg flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99:1439–41
Butzelaar RM, Fortner JG. Results of hemipelvectomy for soft tissue sarcoma. Neth J Surg 1981; 33:79–82
Capanna R, Manfrini M, Pignatti G, et al. Hemipelvectomy in malignant neoplasms of the hip region. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1990; 16:425–37
Sugarbaker PH, Chretien PA. Hemipelvectomy. In: Sugarbaker PH, Nicholson TH, eds. Atlas of Extremity Sarcoma Surgery. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1984:45–67
Dunn DL, Beilman GJ. Surgical infections. In: Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, et al, eds. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005:108–28
National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. Postoperative wound infections: the influence of ultraviolet irradiation of the operating room and of various other factors. Ann Surg 1964; 160(Suppl 2):1–132
Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections. The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America; The Association for Practitioners in Infection Control; The Centers for Disease Control; The Surgical Infection Society. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992; 13:599–605
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system report, data summary from January 1992–April 2000, issued June 2000. Am J Infect Control 2000; 28:429–48
Acknowledgments
Supported by a Mayo Clinic Department of Surgery Institutional Research Grant. We thank Jeanine Ransom for her assistance in processing the statistical data; and Alissa Baumgartner and John Hedlund for their assistance in preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Senchenkov, A., Moran, S.L., Petty, P.M. et al. Predictors of Complications and Outcomes of External Hemipelvectomy Wounds: Account of 160 Consecutive Cases. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 355–363 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9672-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9672-5