Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic hepatic artery infusion pump (LHAIP) placement is a novel treatment option for patients with colorectal liver metastases. This study investigates technical difficulties with regard to variant hepatic arteries and the preliminary outcomes for patients treated with LHAIP placement.
Methods
Between March 1998 and January 2003, 38 patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver, 35 (92%) of who had prior systemic chemotherapy that failed, were treated with LHAIP.
Results
Twelve patients (32%) had LHAIP placement only, and 26 (68%) had pump placement combined with laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA; 24 patients) and/or liver resection (2 patients). Variant hepatic arterial (HA) anatomy was present in 18 patients (47%). The presence of a variant HA did not increase pump complications, operative time, or blood loss (P ≥ .20) or decrease the functional time of pump use (P = .91) in comparison with normal anatomy. In all patients with a variant HA, laparoscopic ligation of the variant vessel and/or cannulation of nongastroduodenal artery resulted in complete hepatic perfusion. Three misperfusions identified intraoperatively with use of methylene blue injection were corrected by laparoscopic ligation (two) or postoperative angioembolization (one). Postoperative pump radionuclide flow studies confirmed isolated hepatic artery infusion in all cases. There was a 13% pump-related complication rate. During a median follow-up of 11 months (0.5 to 35.5 months), the actuarial rate of overall survival was 47% and the estimated median survival time was 17.5 months.
Conclusions
LHAIP placement is technically feasible, and variant HA is not associated with increased pump complications or decreased pump functional time.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Stratmann SL. Hepatic artery chemotherapy in the management of colorectal metastases. BUMC Proceedings 2002;15:376–9.
Kemeny N, Fata F. Hepatic-arterial chemotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2001;2:418–28.
Ackerman N. The blood supply of experimental liver metastases. IV. Changes in vascularity with increasing tumor growth. Surgery 1974;75:589–96.
Kemeny NE, Ron IG. Hepatic arterial chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal patients. Seminars Oncol 1999;26:524–35.
Campbell KA, Burns RC, Sitzmann JV, Lipsett PA, Grochow L, Niederhuber JE. Regional chemotherapy devices: effect of experience and anatomy on complications. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:822–6.
Kemeny N, Gones M, Sullivan D, et al. Phase I study of hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine and dexamethasone with systemic irinotecan for unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;10:2687–95.
Curley SA, Chase JL, Roh MS, Hohn DC. Technical considerations and complications associated with the placement of 180 implantable hepatic artery infusion devices. Surgery 1993;114:928–35.
Daly JM, Kemeny N, Oderman P, Botet J. Long-term hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy: anatomic considerations, operative technique, and treatment morbidity. Arch Surg 1984;119:936–41.
Heinrich S, Petrowsky H, Schwinnen I, et al. Technical complications of continuous intra-arterial chemotherapy with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine and 5-fluorouracil for colorectal liver metastases. Surgery 2003;133:40–8.
Urbach DV, Herron DM, Khajanchee YS, Swanstrom LL, Hansen PD. Laparoscopic hepatic artery infusion pump placement. Arch Surg 2001;136:700–4.
Cheng J, Glasgow RE, O’Rourke RW, Swanstrom LL, Hansen PD. Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and hepatic artery infusion pump placement in the evolving treatment of colorectal hepatic metastases. Surg Endosc 2003;17:61–7.
Franklin ME, Gonzalez JJ. Laparoscopic placement of hepatic artery catheter for regional chemotherapy infusion: technique, benefits and complications. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:398–407.
Rougier PR, Laplanche A, Huguier M, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine in patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1112–8.
Harmantas A, Rotstein LE, Langer. Regional versus systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver: is there a survival difference? Meta-analysis of the published literature. Cancer 1996;78:1639–45.
Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Reappraisal of hepatic arterial infusion in the treatment of nonresectable liver metastases from colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:252–7.
Kemeny N, Huang Y, Cohen AM, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;341:2039–48.
Vauthey JN, Marsh DW, Cendan JC, Chu NM, Copeland EM. Arterial therapy of hepatic colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 1996;83:447–55.
Watkins E, Khazei AM, Nahra KS. Surgical basis for arterial infusion chemotherapy of disseminated carcinoma of the liver. Surg Gyn Oncol 1970;130:581–605.
Feliciotti F, Paganini A, Guerrieri M, Chan R, Campagnacci R, Lzoche E. Laparoscopic intra-arterial catheter implantation for regional chemotherapy of liver metastasis. Surg Endosc 1996;10:449–52.
Bloom AI, Gordon RL, Ahl KH, et al. Transcatheter embolization for the treatment of misperfusion after hepatic artery chemoinfusion pump implantation. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:350–8.
Allen PJ, Stojadinovic A, Ben-Porat L, et al. The management of variant arterial anatomy during hepatic arterial infusion pump placement. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:875–80.
Barbot DJ, Marks JH, Feld RI, Liu J, Rosato FE. Improved staging of liver tumors using laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasound. J Surgical Oncol 1997;64:63–7.
Kohoe S, Endo K, Yamamoto M, et al. Protracted hepatic arterial infusion with low-dose cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Surgery 2002;131:S128–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, J., Hong, D., Zhu, G. et al. Laparoscopic Placement of Hepatic Artery Infusion Pumps: Technical Considerations and Early Results. Ann Surg Oncol 11, 589–597 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.05.013
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.05.013