Abstract
Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a pathogenic factor of severe hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). No vaccine or specific treatment is currently available for EV71 infection. Hence, we developed a buccal mucoadhesive gel containing matrine to protect against HFMD. Mucoadhesive gels were prepared by Carbopol 974P and were combined with Carbopol 971P, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-Na), or hydroxypropylmethy cellulose (HPMC K100M). The formulations were characterized in terms of tensile testing and continuous flow techniques for mucoadhesion. The rheological studies and in vitro drug release characteristics were also investigated. The results showed that combinations of two polymers significantly improved mucoadhesion, especially Carbopol 974P blended with HPMC. Carbopol 974P to HPMC blend ratios of 1:1 and 2:1 induced better mucoadhesion in the tensile test and continuous flow method, respectively. The most sustained release was obtained at a Carbopol 974P to HPMC ratio of 2.5:1. A predominantly non-Fickian diffusion release mechanism was obtained. The gel containing 2.5% Carbopol 974P combined with 1% HPMC showed good mucoadhesion properties and sustained drug release.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hearnden V, Sankar V, Hull K, Juras DV, Greenberg M, Kerr AR, et al. New developments and opportunities in oral mucosal drug delivery for local and systemic disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:16–28.
Karavana SY, Guneri P, Ertan G. Benzydamine hydrochloride buccal bioadhesive gels designed for oral ulcers: preparation, rheological, textural, mucoadhesive and release properties. Pharm Dev Technol. 2009;14:623–31.
Tiyaboonchai W, Rodleang I, Ounaroon A. Mucoadhesive polyethylenimine-dextran sulfate nanoparticles containing Punica granatum peel extract as a novel sustained-release antimicrobial. Pharm Dev Technol. 2015;20:426–32.
Philip AK, Srivastava M, Pathak K. Buccoadhesive gels of glibenclamide: a means for achieving enhanced bioavailability. Drug Deliv. 2009;16(7):405–15.
Perioli L, Nocchetti M, Giannelli P, Pagano C, Bastianini M. Hydrotalcite composites for an effective fluoride buccal administration: a new technological approach. Int J Pharm. 2013;454(1):259–68.
Kumria R, Nair AB, Al-Dhubiab BE. Loratidine buccal films for allergic rhinitis: development and evaluation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2014;40(5):625–31.
Suwannateep N, Banlunara W, Wanichwecharungruang SP, Chiablaem K, Lirdprapamongkol K, Svasti J. Mucoadhesive curcumin nanospheres: biological activity, adhesion to stomach mucosa and release of curcumin into the circulation. J Control Release. 2011;151(2):176–82.
Sakeer K, Al-Zein H, Hassan I, Martin GP, Nokhodchi A. Use of xanthan and its binary blends with synthetic polymers to design controlled release formulations of buccoadhesive nystatin tablets. Pharm Dev Technol. 2010;15(4):360–8.
Sinha P, Ubaidulla U, Nayak AK. Okra (Hibiscus esculentus) gum-alginate blend mucoadhesive beads for controlled glibenclamide release. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;72:1069–75.
Khutoryanskiy VV. Hydrogen-bonded interpolymer complexes as materials for pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm. 2007;334(1–2):15–26.
Wang M, Tao L, Xu H. Chinese herbal medicines as a source of molecules with anti-enterovirus 71 activity. Chin Med. 2016;11(2):2–26.
Yang Y, Xiu J, Zhang X, Zhang L, Yan K, Qin C, et al. Antiviral effect of matrine against human enterovirus 71. Molecules. 2012;17(9):10370–6.
Trujillo-Cayado LA, Alfaro MC, Raymundo A, Sousa I, Munoz J. Rheological behavior of aqueous dispersions containing blends of rhamsan and welan polysaccharides with an eco-friendly surfactant. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;145:430–7.
De Souza Ferreira SB, Moco TD, Borghi-Pangoni FB, Junqueira MV, Bruschi ML. Rheological, mucoadhesive and textural properties of thermoresponsive polymer blends for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;55:164–78.
Mirza MA, Ahmad S, Mallick MN, Manzoor N, Talegaonkar S, Iqbal Z. Development of a novel synergistic thermosensitive gel for vaginal candidiasis: an in vitro, in vivo evaluation. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;103:275–82.
Choi HG, Kim CK. Development of omeprazole buccal adhesive tablets with stability enhancement in human saliva. J Control Release. 2000;68:397–404.
Donnelly R, Shaikh R, Raj Singh T, Garland M, Woolfson A. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2011;3(1):89–100.
Kassem MA, ElMeshad AN, Fares AR. Lyophilized sustained release mucoadhesive chitosan sponges for buccal buspirone hydrochloride delivery: formulation and in vitro evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2015;16(3):537–47.
Hombach JB-S, Andreas. Handbook of experimental pharmacology. In: Schafer-Korting M, editor. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Berlin Heidelberg: Drug Delivery; 2010.
Khutoryanskiy VV. Advances in mucoadhesion and mucoadhesive polymers. Macromol Biosci. 2011;11(6):748–64.
Davidovich-Pinhas M, Bianco-Peled H. Mucoadhesion: a review of characterization techniques. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010;7(2):259–71.
Ivarsson D, Wahlgren M. Comparison of in vitro methods of measuring mucoadhesion: ellipsometry, tensile strength and rheological measurements. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces. 2012;92:353–9.
Grabovac V, Guggi D, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Comparison of the mucoadhesive properties of various polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1713–23.
Agarwal V, Mishra B. Design, development, and biopharmaceutical properties of buccoadhesive compacts of pentazocine. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1999;25(6):701–9.
Qi H, Chen W, Huang C, Li L, Chen C, Li W, et al. Development of a poloxamer analogs/carbopol-based in situ gelling and mucoadhesive ophthalmic delivery system for puerarin. Int J Pharm. 2007;337(1–2):178–87.
Galgatte UC, Kumbhar AB, Chaudhari PD. Development of in situ gel for nasal delivery: design, optimization, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Drug Deliv. 2014;21(1):62–73.
Rao KVRB, P. A novel in situ method to test polymers and coated microparticles for bioadhesion. Int J Pharm. 1989;22(3):265–72.
Dong L, Liu C, Cun D, Fang L. The effect of rheological behavior and microstructure of the emulgels on the release and permeation profiles of Terpinen-4-ol. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;78:140–50.
Vueba ML, de Batista Carvalho LA, Veiga F, Sousa JJ, Pina ME. In vitro release of ketoprofen from hydrophilic matrix tablets containing cellulose polymer mixtures. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2013;39(11):1651–62.
Sauri J, Millan D, Sune-Negre JM, Colom H, Tico JR, Minarro M, et al. Quality by design approach to understand the physicochemical phenomena involved in controlled release of captopril SR matrix tablets. Int J Pharm. 2014;477(1–2):431–41.
Ghosal KC, Chandra A, Rajabalaya R, Chakraborty S, Nanda A. Mathematical modeling of drug release profiles for modified hydrophobic HPMC based gels. Pharmazie. 2012;67:147–55.
Costa PSL, Manuel J. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;13(2):123–33.
Lin CC, Metters AT. Hydrogels in controlled release formulations: network design and mathematical modeling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58(12–13):1379–408.
Villanova JC, Ayres E, Orefice RL. Design, characterization and preliminary in vitro evaluation of a mucoadhesive polymer based on modified pectin and acrylic monomers with potential use as a pharmaceutical excipient. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;121:372–81.
Mouftah S, Abdel-Mottaleb MM, Lamprecht A. Buccal delivery of low molecular weight heparin by cationic polymethacrylate nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2016;515:565–74.
Shin SC, Kim JY, Oh IJ. Mucoadhesive and physicochemical characterization of Carbopol-Poloxamer gels containing triamcinolone acetonide. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2000;26(3):307–12.
Hauptstein S, Hintzen F, Muller C, Ohm M, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Development and in vitro evaluation of a buccal drug delivery system based on preactivated thiolated pectin. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2014;40(11):1530–7.
Asane GS, Nirmal SA, Rasal KB, Naik AA, Mahadik MS, Rao YM. Polymers for Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: a current status. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2008;34(11):1246–66.
Salamatmiller N, Chittchang M, Johnston T. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1666–91.
Shinkar DM, Dhake AS, Setty CM. Drug delivery from the oral cavity: a focus on mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery systems. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2012;66(5):466–500.
Suknuntha K, Tantishaiyakul V, Worakul N, Taweepreda W. Characterization of muco- and bioadhesive properties of chitosan, PVP, and chitosan/PVP blends and release of amoxicillin from alginate beads coated with chitosan/PVP. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2011;37(4):408–18.
Khutoryanskaya OV, Morrison PW, Seilkhanov SK, Mussin MN, Ozhmukhametova EK, Rakhypbekov TK, et al. Hydrogen-bonded complexes and blends of poly(acrylic acid) and methylcellulose: nanoparticles and mucoadhesive films for ocular delivery of riboflavin. Macromol Biosci. 2014;14(2):225–34.
Vo AQ, Feng X, Pimparade M, Ye X, Kim DW, Martin ST, et al. Dual-mechanism gastroretentive drug delivery system loaded with an amorphous solid dispersion prepared by hot-melt extrusion. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;102:71–84.
Accili D, Menghi G, Bonacucina G, Martino PD, Palmieri GF. Mucoadhesion dependence of pharmaceutical polymers on mucosa characteristics. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;22(4):225–34.
Piao J, Lee JE, Weon KY, Kim DW, Lee JS, Park JD, et al. Development of novel mucoadhesive pellets of metformin hydrochloride. Arch Pharm Res. 2009;32(3):391–7.
Hennink WEN, Van CF. Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54(1):13–36.
Perioli L, Pagano C. Preformulation studies of mucoadhesive tablets for carbamazepine sublingual administration. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;102:915–22.
Artem V, ZS N, GA M, VV K. Design of mucoadhesive polymeric films based on blends of poly(acrylic acid) and (hydroxypropyl)cellulose. Biomicromolecules. 2007;7(7):1637–43.
Mohammadi-Samani S, Bahri-Najafi R, Yousefi G. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of prednisolone buccoadhesive tablets. Farmaco. 2005;60(4):339–44.
Efentakis M, Pagoni I, Vlachou M, Avgoustakis K. Dimensional changes, gel layer evolution and drug release studies in hydrophilic matrices loaded with drugs of different solubility. Int J Pharm. 2007;339(1–2):66–75.
Labib GS, Farid RM. Osteogenic effect of locally applied pentoxyfilline gel: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Drug Deliv. 2015;22(8):1094–102.
Ruan J, Liu J, Zhu D, Gong T, Yang F, Hao X, et al. Preparation and evaluation of self-nanoemulsified drug delivery systems (SNEDDSs) of matrine based on drug–phospholipid complex technique. Int J Pharm. 2010;386(1–2):282–90.
Yusif RM, Hashim I, Mohamed EA, et al. Investigation and evaluation of an in situ interpolymer complex of carbopol with polyvinylpyrrolidone as a matrix for gastro tablets. Chem Pharm Bull. 2016;64:42–51.
Liu J, Lin S, Li L, Liu E. Release of theophylline from polymer blend hydrogels. Int J Pharm. 2005;298(1):117–25.
Mortazavi SA, Jaffariazar Z, Damercheli E. Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of ocular ciprofloxacin-containing minitablets prepared with different combinations of Carbopol 974P and various cellulose derivatives. Iran J Pharm Res. 2010;9(2):107–14.
Baloglu E, Karavana SY, Hyusein IY, Kose T. Design and formulation of mebeverine HCl semisolid formulations for intraorally administration. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11(1):181–8.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Commission of Hangzhou under Grant Number. 20130633B18, and we like to thank Shanghai Chineway Pharm., Tech., Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Shenmei Pharmaceutical Tech., Co., Ltd. for separately providing gift samples of HPMC K100 M, CMC-Na, and Carbopol 974P/971P.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Yan, J., Yu, S. et al. Formulation and In Vitro Release Kinetics of Mucoadhesive Blend Gels Containing Matrine for Buccal Administration. AAPS PharmSciTech 19, 470–480 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-017-0853-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-017-0853-7