Abstract
Flow property of pharmaceutical powders can be assessed by various flow testers and test methods. In this study, eight commercially available lactose grades were sourced and tested for angles of repose, tapping studies, shear cell measurements, stirred powder rheometry, and avalanching powder measurements. The relationships between various flow parameters and particle size were analyzed. Deviations from the general trend could be attributed to either the insensitivity of the test or differences in particle shape. The basic flowability energy of the powder rheometer was unable to reconcile the effects of shape and particle size on powder flowability. Avalanche time of the revolving drum powder analyzer and angle of repose exhibited good correlation with each other (r = 0.92) but experienced poor resolution for samples of smaller particle sizes due to powder cohesiveness and the propensity for agglomerative flow. Flow test parameters could be categorized into three broad types, based on their relationship with particle size: (i) linear relationship, (ii) test parameter more sensitive to smaller sized particles, and (iii) test parameter more sensitive to larger sized particles. Choice of test parameters used to represent powder flow should be dependent on the sensitivity of the selected flow test methods to the sample types.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Prescot J, Barnum R. On powder flowability. Pharm Technol. 2000;24:60–84.
Lindberg NO, Palsson M, Pihl AC, Freeman R, Freeman T, Zetzener H, et al. Flowability measurements of pharmaceutical powder mixtures with poor flow using five different techniques. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30(7):785–91.
Fitzpatrick JJ, Barringer SA, Iqbal T. Flow property measurement of food powders and sensitivity of Jenike’s hopper design methodology to the measured values. J Food Eng. 2004;61(3):399–405.
Sandler N, Wilson D. Prediction of granule packing and flow behavior based on particle size and shape analysis. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99(2):958–68.
Yu W, Muteki K, Zhang L, Kim G. Prediction of bulk powder flow performance using comprehensive particle size and particle shape distributions. J Pharm Sci. 2011;100(1):284–93.
Fu X, Huck D, Makein L, Armstrong B, Willen U, Freeman T. Effect of particle shape and size on flow properties of lactose powders. Particuology. 2012;10(2):203–8.
Kurz HP, Münz G. The influence of particle size distribution on the flow properties of limestone powders. Powder Technol. 1975;11(1):37–40.
Horio T, Yasuda M, Matsusaka S. Effect of particle shape on powder flowability of microcrystalline cellulose as determined using the vibration shear tube method. Int J Pharm. 2014;473(1–2):572–8.
Friedman SP, Robinson DA. Particle shape characterization using angle of repose measurements for predicting the effective permittivity and electrical conductivity of saturated granular media. Water Resour Res. 2002;38(11):18-1–18-11.
Ferrari F, Cocconi D, Bettini R, Giordano F, Santi P, Tobyn M, et al. The surface roughness of lactose particles can be modulated by wet-smoothing using a high-shear mixer. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2004;5(4):69–74.
Pohlman NA, Severson BL, Ottino JM, Lueptow RM. Surface roughness effects in granular matter: influence on angle of repose and the absence of segregation. Phys Rev E. 2006;73(3):031304.
Rios M. Developments in powder flow testing. Pharm Technol Eur. 2006;30(2):38–49.
Sandler N, Reiche K, Heinämäki J, Yliruusi J. Effect of moisture on powder flow properties of theophylline. Pharmaceutics. 2010;2(3):275–90.
Stoklosa AM, Lipasek RA, Taylor LS, Mauer LJ. Effects of storage conditions, formulation, and particle size on moisture sorption and flowability of powders: a study of deliquescent ingredient blends. Food Res Int. 2012;49(2):783–91.
Crouter A, Briens L. The effect of moisture on the flowability of pharmaceutical excipients. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;15(1):65–74.
Jallo LJ, Dave RN. Explaining electrostatic charging and flow of surface-modified acetaminophen powders as a function of relative humidity through surface energetics. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104(7):2225–32.
Matsusaka S, Maruyama H, Matsuyama T, Ghadiri M. Triboelectric charging of powders: a review. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65(22):5781–807.
Dave RN, Wu C-Y, Chaudhuri B, Watano S. Magnetically mediated flow enhancement for controlled powder discharge of cohesive powders. Powder Technol. 2000;112(1–2):111–25.
Ganesan V, Rosentrater KA, Muthukumarappan K. Flowability and handling characteristics of bulk solids and powders—a review with implications for DDGS. Biosyst Eng. 2008;101(4):425–35.
Boonyai P, Bhandari B, Howes T. Stickiness measurement techniques for food powders: a review. Powder Technol. 2004;145(1):34–46.
Brech M, Pearce D, Bagga P, Nijdam JJ. Improved lactose powder properties by in-situ coating with additives during spray drying. J Med Bioeng. 2013;2(3):207–13.
Visser J. An invited review, van der Waals and other cohesive forces affecting powder fluidization. Powder Technol. 1989;58(1):1–10.
Castellanos A, Valverde JM, Pérez AT, Ramos A, Watson PK. Flow regimes in fine cohesive powders. Am Phys Soc. 1999;82:1156–9.
Bell TA. Industrial needs in solids flow for the 21st century. Powder Handling Process. 1999;11:9–12.
Nagel KM, Peck GE. Investigating the effects of excipients on the powder flow characteristics of theophylline anhydrous powder formulations. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2003;29(3):277–87.
Plinke MA, Leith D, Löffler RHF. Cohesion in granular materials. Bulk Solids Handling. 1994;14:101–6.
United States Pharmacopeia <1174 > Powder flow; USP 39/NF 34ed.; U.S. Pharmacopoeial Convention: Rockville, MD, 2016.
Jenike AW. Gravity flow of bulk solids. Engineering Experiment Station: University of Utah; 1961.
Shah RB, Tawakkul MA, Khan MA. Comparative evaluation of flow for pharmaceutical powders and granules. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(1):250–8.
Saw HY, Davies CE, Paterson AHJ, Jones JR. Correlation between powder flow properties measured by shear testing and Hausner ratio. Procedia Eng. 2015;102:218–25.
Haaker G. The influence of consolidation on shear test results. Powder Technol. 1987;51(3):231–6.
Freeman R, Fu X. Characterisation of powder bulk, dynamic flow and shear properties in relation to die filling. Powder Metall. 2008;51(3):196–201.
Leturia M, Benali M, Lagarde S, Ronga I, Saleh K. Characterization of flow properties of cohesive powders: a comparative study of traditional and new testing methods. Powder Technol. 2014;253:406–23.
Blott SJ, Pye K. Particle shape: a review and new methods of characterization and classification. Sedimentology. 2008;55(1):31–63.
Bodhmage A. Correlation between physical properties and flowability: Indicators for fine powders. Canada University of Saskatchewan 2006.
Emery E. Flow properties of selected pharmaceutical powders: University of Saskatchewan 2008.
Podczeck F. A shape factor to assess the shape of particles using image analysis. Powder Technol. 1997;93(1):47–53.
Carson JW, Wilms H. Development of an international standard for shear testing. Powder Technol. 2006;167(1):1–9.
Shaffer K, Paterson AHJ, Davies CE, Hebbink G. Stokes shape factor for lactose crystals. Adv Powder Technol. 2011;22(4):454–7.
Kleinhans MG, Markies H, de Vet SJ, in ‘t Veld AC, Postema FN. Static and dynamic angles of repose in loose granular materials under reduced gravity. J Geophys Res. 2011;116, E11004.
Soh JL, Liew CV, Heng PW. New indices to characterize powder flow based on their avalanching behavior. Pharm Dev Technol. 2006;11(1):93–102.
Thakur SC, Ahmadian H, Sun J, Ooi JY. An experimental and numerical study of packing, compression, and caking behaviour of detergent powders. Particuology. 2014;12:2–12.
Andrews G, Jones D, Hui Z, Diak OA, Walker G. Effects of grinding in pharmaceutical tablet production. In: Shayne CG, editor. Pharmaceutical manufacturing handbook: production and processes: Wiley; 2008.
Freeman R. Measuring the flow properties of consolidated, conditioned and aerated powders—a comparative study using a powder rheometer and a rotational shear cell. Powder Technol. 2007;174(1–2):25–33.
Bharadwaj R, Ketterhagen WR, Hancock BC. Discrete element simulation study of a Freeman powder rheometer. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65(21):5747–56.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the GEA-NUS PPRL fund (N-148-000-008-001). Justin Tay is a research scholar at the National University of Singapore pursuing his higher degree.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tay, J.Y.S., Liew, C.V. & Heng, P.W.S. Powder Flow Testing: Judicious Choice of Test Methods. AAPS PharmSciTech 18, 1843–1854 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-016-0655-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-016-0655-3