Skip to main content
Log in

Relative Precision of Inhaler Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution (APSD) Metrics by Full Resolution and Abbreviated Andersen Cascade Impactors (ACIs): Part 2—Investigation of Bias in Extra-Fine Mass Fraction with AIM-HRT Impactor

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to resolve an anomalously high measure of extra-fine particle fraction (EPF) determined by the abbreviated cascade impactor possibly relevant for human respiratory tract (AIM-HRT) in the experiment described in Part 1 of this two-part series, in which the relative precision of abbreviated impactors was evaluated in comparison with a full resolution Andersen eight-stage cascade impactor (ACI). Evidence that the surface coating used to mitigate particle bounce was laterally displaced by the flow emerging from the jets of the lower stage was apparent upon microscopic examination of the associated collection plate of the AIM-HRT impactor whose cut point size defines EPF. A filter soaked in surfactant was floated on top of this collection plate, and further measurements were made using the same pressurized metered-dose inhaler-based formulation and following the same procedure as in Part 1. Measures of EPF, fine particle, and coarse particle fractions were comparable with those obtained with the ACI, indicating that the cause of the bias had been identified and removed. When working with abbreviated impactors, this precaution is advised whenever there is evidence that surface coating displacement has occurred, a task that can be readily accomplished by microscopic inspection of all collection plates after allowing the impactor to sample ambient air for a few minutes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitchell JP, Nagel MW, Doyle CC, Ali RS, Avvakoumova VI, Christopher JD, et al. Relative precision of inhaler aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) metrics by full resolution and abbreviated Andersen cascade impactors (ACIs): Part 1. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11:843–51. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-010-9452-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchell JP, Nagel MW, Avvakoumova V, MacKay H, Ali R. The abbreviated impactor measurement (AIM) concept: Part 1—Influence of particle bounce and re-entrainment—evaluation with a “dry” pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI)-based formulation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10(1):243–51. doi:10.1208/s12249-009-9202-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Christopher D, Curry P, Doub B, Furnkranz K, Lavery M, Lin K, et al. Considerations for the development and practice of cascade impaction testing including a mass balance failure investigation tree. J Aerosol Med. 2003;16:235–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. US Pharmacopeia 32/National Formulary 27, Rockville, MD. Monograph for albuterol.

  5. Dolovich M. Measurement of particle size characteristics of metered dose inhaler (MDI) aerosols. J Aerosol Med. 1991;4:251–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rao AK, Whitby KT. Non-ideal collection characteristics of inertial impactors—single stage impactors and solid particles. J Aerosol Sci. 1978;9:77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rao AK, Whitby KT. Non-ideal collection characteristics of inertial impactors—cascade impactors. J Aerosol Sci. 1978;9:87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. European Directorate for Quality in Medicines (EDQM). European pharmacopeia 6.8, monograph 2.9.18. Preparations for inhalations: aerodynamic assessment of fine particles. Strasburg: EDQM; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. US Pharmacopeial Convention. United States Pharmacopeia 33/National Formulary 28, Chapter <601> Aerosols, nasal sprays, metered-dose inhalers, and dry powder inhalers. Rockville, MD; 2010.

  10. Mitchell JP, Nagel MW. Cascade impactors for the size characterization of aerosols from medical inhalers: their uses and limitations. J Aerosol Med. 2003;16(4):341–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marple VA, Olson BA, Miller NC. The role of inertial particle collectors in evaluating pharmaceutical aerosol delivery systems. J Aerosol Med. 1998;11S1:S139–53.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marple VA, Liu BYH. Characteristics of laminar jet impactors. Environ Sci Technol. 1974;8:648–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang CP, Marple VA, Rubow KL. Influence of cross-flow on particle collection characteristics of multi-nozzle impactors. J Aerosol Sci. 1991;22:403–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang C-H, Lin Y-C. Influence of substrate porosity and thickness on the collection efficiency of an impactor stage. J Aerosol Sci. 2010;41(4):364–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sethuraman VV, Hickey AJ. Evaluation of pre-separator performance for the 8-stage nonviable Andersen impactor. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2001;2(1):article 4. Available at: http://www.aapspharmscitech.org/.

  16. Dunbar C, Kataya A, Tiangbe T. Reducing bounce effects in the Andersen cascade impactor. Int J Pharm. 2005;301(1–2):25–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge feedback received during the preparation of this manuscript from the other members of the IPAC-RS Cascade Impactor Working Group and also from discussions with members of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor Sub-Team. The helpful comments of the anonymous reviewers were also appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svetlana Lyapustina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell, J.P., Nagel, M.W., Doyle, C.C. et al. Relative Precision of Inhaler Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution (APSD) Metrics by Full Resolution and Abbreviated Andersen Cascade Impactors (ACIs): Part 2—Investigation of Bias in Extra-Fine Mass Fraction with AIM-HRT Impactor. AAPS PharmSciTech 11, 1115–1118 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-010-9473-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-010-9473-1

KEY WORDS

Navigation