References
FDA. Guidance for industry: clinical pharmacology data to support a demonstration of biosimilarity to a reference product. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm397017.pdf. (Accessed 18 Nov 2017).
Schiestl M, Stangler T, Torella C, Cepeljnik T, et al. Acceptable changes in quality attributes of glycosylated biopharmaceuticals. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(4):310–2.
McCamish M, Woollett G. The state of the art in the development of biosimilars. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(3):405–17.
Smolen JS, Cohen SB, Tony H-P, Scheinberg M, et al. A randomised, double-blind trial to demonstrate bioequivalence of GP2013 and reference rituximab combined with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1598–602.
Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, Tanaka Y, Sakurai T, et al. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic equivalence and 54-week efficacy and safety of CT-P13 and innovator infliximab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(6):817–24.
Hyland E, Mant T, Vlachos P, Attkins N, et al. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of MSB11022, a biosimilar of adalimumab, with Humira(®) in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82(4):983–93.
Smith MR. Rituximab (monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody): mechanisms of action and resistance. Oncogene. 2003;22(47):7359–68.
Edwards JCW, Szczepański L, Szechiński J, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A, et al. Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(25):2572–81.
Katz R. Biomarkers and surrogate markers: an FDA perspective. NeuroRx. 2004;1(2):189–95.
Henry NL, Hayes DF. Cancer biomarkers. Mol Oncol. 2012;6(2):140–6.
FDA. Bioequivalence studies with pharmacokinetic endpoints for drugs submitted under an ANDA. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm377465.pdf. (Accessed 18 Nov 2017).
Zhu P, Sy SKB, Skerjanec A. Application of pharmacometric analysis in the design of clinical pharmacology studies for biosimilar development. AAPS J. 2018;20(2):40.
FDA. Non-inferiority clinical trials to establish effectiveness. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM202140.pdf. (Accessed 18 Nov 2017).
FDA. Briefing Document Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting: EP2006, a proposed biosimilar to Neupogen® (filgrastim) https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/OncologicDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM428782.pdf. (Accessed 18 Nov 2016).
Acknowledgements
We would like to give special thanks to Vincent Chow (Amgen Inc.) for providing invaluable insights and suggestions for this article. We also would like to acknowledge Sherwin K. B. Sy (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation), Stacey Ricci (FDA), Sue Limb (FDA), Rajnikanth Madabushi (FDA), and Sarah J Schrieber (FDA) for their thoughtful inputs and kind help in editing this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, P., Ji, P. & Wang, Y. Using Clinical PK/PD Studies to Support No Clinically Meaningful Differences Between a Proposed Biosimilar and the Reference Product. AAPS J 20, 89 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-018-0246-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-018-0246-1