Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling of Bounded Outcome Scores with Data on the Boundaries: Application to Disability Assessment for Dementia Scores in Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Research Article
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mixed-effects beta regression (BR), boundary-inflated beta regression (ZOI), and coarsening model (CO) were investigated for analyzing bounded outcome scores with data at the boundaries in the context of Alzheimer’s disease. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to simulate disability assessment for dementia (DAD) scores using these three models, and each set of simulated data were analyzed by the original simulation model. One thousand trials were simulated, and each trial contained 250 subjects. For each subject, DAD scores were simulated at baseline, 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, and 78 weeks. The simulation-reestimation exercise showed that all the three models could reasonably recover their true parameter values. The bias of the parameter estimates of the ZOI model was generally less than 1%, while the bias of the CO model was mainly within 5%. The bias of the BR model was slightly higher, i.e., less than or in the order of 20%. In the application to real-world DAD data from clinical studies, examination of prediction error and visual predictive check (VPC) plots suggested that both BR and ZOI models had similar predictive performance and described the longitudinal progression of DAD slightly better than the CO model. In conclusion, the investigated three modeling approaches may be sensible choices for bounded outcome scores with data on the edges. Prediction error and VPC plots can be used to identify the model with best predictive performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141(11):1356–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gelinas I et al. Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer's disease: the disability assessment for dementia. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53(5):471–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tekin S et al. Activities of daily living in Alzheimer's disease: neuropsychiatric, cognitive, and medical illness influences. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001;9(1):81–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13(4):227–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Swearingen CJ, Melguizo Castro MS, Bursac Z. Modeling percentage outcomes: the %beta_regression macro. SAS®Global Forum Proceedings. 2011;335:1–12.

  7. Smithson M, Verkuilen J. A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychol Methods. 2006;11(1):54–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cribari-Neto F, Zeileis A. Beta Regression in R. J Stat Softw. 2010;34(2):1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrari SP, Cribari-Neto F. Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. J Appl Stat. 2004;31(7):799–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ospina R, Ferrari SP. Inflated beta distributions. Stat Pap. 2010;51:111–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ospina R, Ferrari SP. A general class of zero-or-one inflated beta regression models. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2011;56(6):1609–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ospina R, Ferrari SP. A general class of zero-or-one inflated beta regression models. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2012;56(6):1609–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Verkuilen J, Smithson M. Mixed and mixture regression models for continuous bounded responses using the beta distribution. J Educ Behav Stat. 2012;37(1):82–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Molas M, Lesaffre E. A comparison of three random effects approaches to analyze repeated bounded outcome scores with an application in a stroke revalidation study. Stat Med. 2008;27(30):6612–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ito K, Hutmacher M, Corrigan B. Modeling of Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ) as continuous bounded data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database [Poster]. American Conference on Pharmacometrics. In American Conference on Pharmacometrics. San Diego; 2011.

  16. Ito K, Hutmacher MM, Corrigan BW. Modeling of Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ) as continuous bounded data from the ADNI database. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2012;39(6):601–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutmacher MM et al. Estimating transformations for repeated measures modeling of continuous bounded outcome data. Stat Med. 2012;30(9):935–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu C et al. Bounded outcome score modeling: application to treating psoriasis with ustekinumab. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2011;38(4):497–517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ito K et al. Disease progression meta-analysis model in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2010;6(1):39–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Holford NH, Peace KE. Results and validation of a population pharmacodynamic model for cognitive effects in Alzheimer patients treated with tacrine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(23):11471–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Holford NH, Peace KE. Methodologic aspects of a population pharmacodynamic model for cognitive effects in Alzheimer patients treated with tacrine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(23):11466–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kieschnick R, McCullough BD. Regression analysis of variates observed on (0, 1): percentages, proportions and fractions. Stat Model. 2003;3:193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Albert JM, Wang W, Nelson S. Estimating overall exposure effects for zero-inflated regression models with application to dental caries. Stat Methods Med Res. 2011

  24. Feldman H, Sauter A, Donald A, Gelinas I, Gauthier S, Torfs KA, et al. The disability assessment for dementia scale: a 12-month study of functional ability in mild to moderate severity Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2001;15(2):89–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Salloway S, Sperling R, Fox NC, et al. Two phase 3 trials of bapineuzumab in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:322–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Salloway S, Sperling R, Gilman S, Fox NC, Blennow K, Raskind M, et al. A phase 2 multiple ascending dose trial of bapineuzumab in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2009;73(24):2061–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Suh GH, Ju YS, Yeon BK, Shah A. A longitudinal study of Alzheimer's disease: rates of cognitive and functional decline. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr. 2004;19(9):817–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu XS, Samtani MN, Dunne A, Nandy P, Vermeulen A, Ridder F. Mixed-effects beta regression for modeling continuous bounded outcome scores using NONMEM when data are not on the boundaries. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2013;1–8

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

There is no conflict of interest. Steven Xu, Mahesh Samtani, and Partha Nandy are employees of Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development. Min Yuan is an associate professor at University of Science and Technology of China and is partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC), grant no. 11201452 and no. 11271346.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Steven Xu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Fig. 1

(DOCX 20 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

(DOCX 21 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

(DOCX 17.4 kb)

Appendices

APPENDIX 1

Table VII A Sample NONMEM Code for the Mixed-Effects Boundary-Inflated Beta Regression Model Is Presented Below

APPENDIX 2

Table VIII A Sample NONMEM Code for the Mixed-Effects Coarsening Model Is Presented Below

APPENDIX 3

Table IX A Sample NONMEM Code (28) for the Beta Regression Model is Presented Below

APPENDIX 4

Nine hundred (900) random data were sampled from a beta distribution, beta(95, 5). Then, 100 of 1’s were added to the data as boundary data. BR was performed to re-estimate the parameters of the beta distribution based on the combined data after rescaling with a small δ. The density of the original data, rescaled data, and re-estimated distribution are shown in Supplementary Figs. 1 (δ = 1e−8) and 2 (δ = 1e−2).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, X.S., Samtani, M., Yuan, M. et al. Modeling of Bounded Outcome Scores with Data on the Boundaries: Application to Disability Assessment for Dementia Scores in Alzheimer’s Disease. AAPS J 16, 1271–1281 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-014-9655-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-014-9655-y

KEY WORDS

Navigation