Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of the Biopharmaceutical Classification System in Early Drug Development

  • Research Article
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) is not only a useful tool for obtaining waivers for in-vivo bioequivalence studies but also for decision making in the discovery and early development of new drugs. Measurement of solubility and permeability in the discovery/development settings is described. These data can be utilized for the preliminary BCS classification of pipeline compounds. A decision tree is described in the prioritization of salt and polymorph screening studies prior to in vivo studies in animals. For BCS class 1 and 3 compounds, polymorphism is less likely to impact on bioavailability. The polymorph screening study may be postponed after animal studies. The BCS classification can also be used in the design of animal and human formulations. A BCS-based animal formulation development decision tree is presented. A compound is triaged based on a series of decision points into one of the five formulation strategies. Human formulation has different requirements than animal formulation. A comparison between animal and human formulation strategies is presented. In conclusion, for non-BCS 1 compounds, the right-first-time polymorph and formulation selection ensures consistent pharmacokinetic performance and avoids bridging BA/BE studies. It is in line with FDA’s initiative to reduce R&D cycle time through quality by design for pharmaceutical products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Scheme 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. L. Amidon, H. Lennernas, V. P. Shah, and J. R. Crison. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutics drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm. Res. 12:413–420 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Chi-Yuan, and L. Z. Benet. Predicting drug disposition via application of BCS: transport/absorption/elimination interplay and development of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system. Pharm. Res. 22:11–23 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. H. Kerns, and L. Di. Multivariate pharmaceutical profiling for drug discovery. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2:87–98 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry, waiver of in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms based on a biopharmaceutics classification system, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, 2000. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm.

  5. World Health Organization. Proposal to waive in vivo bioequivalence requirements for WHO model list of essential medicines immediate-release, solid oral dosage forms. World Health Organization, Technical Report Series no. 937 (2006). Available at http://www.who.int/prequal/info_general/documents/TRS937/WHO_TRS_937__annex8_eng.pdf

  6. M. S. Ku. An oral formulation decision tree based on the biopharmaceutical classification system for first in human clinical trials. Bull. Tech. Gattefosse. 99:89 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Baldoni. Role of BCS in drug development. AAPS/FDA workshop on BE, BCS and Beyond, May 21–23, 2007.

  8. C. A. Lipiniski, F. Lombardo, B. W. Dominy, and P. J. Feeney. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 23:3–25 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Bevan, and R. S. Lloyd. A high-throughput screening method for the determination of aqueous drug solubility using laser nephelometry in microtiter plates. Anal. Chem. 72:1781–1787 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Avdeef. High throughput measurements of solubility profiles. In B. Testa, H. van de Waterbeemd, G. Folkers, R. Guy (eds.) Pharmacokinetic Optimization in Drug Research: Biological, Physiological, and Computational Strategies, Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta, Zurich, 2001, pp 305–326.

  11. P. Artursson, K. Palm, and K. Luthman. Caco-2 monolayers in experimental and theoretical predictions of drug transport. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 22:67–84 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. P. V. Balimane, Y. Han, and S. Chong. Current industrial practices of assessing permeability and p-glycoprotein interaction. The AAPS Journal 8(1) Article 1, E1-E13 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. T. Doluisio, N. F. Billups, L. W. Dittert, E. T. Sugita, and J. V. Swintosky. Drug absorption. I. An in situ rat gut technique yielding realistic absorption rates. J. Pharm. Sci. 58:1196–1200 (1969).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. D. Irvine, L. Takahashi, K. Lockhart, J. Cheong, J. W. Tolan, H. E. Selick, and J. R. Grove. MDCK (Madin–Darby canine kidney) cells: a tool for membrane permeability screening. J. Pharm. Sci. 88:28–33 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Byrn et al. Pharmaceutical solids: a strategic approach to regulatory considerations. Pharm. Res. 12(7):945–954 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guidance for industry, ANDAs: pharmaceutical solid polymorphism. Draft, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, 2007. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/7590fnl.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Sherry Ku.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ku, M.S. Use of the Biopharmaceutical Classification System in Early Drug Development. AAPS J 10, 208–212 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-008-9020-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-008-9020-0

Key words

Navigation